Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 22, 2024, 11:28:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228098 Posts in 43259 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Guns N' Roses
| | |-+  How tight are 'New' GNR going to be together musically after all this time?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: How tight are 'New' GNR going to be together musically after all this time?  (Read 2788 times)
GNFNR_UK
Rocker
***

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 392

I want to believe...


« Reply #20 on: December 27, 2005, 08:59:14 PM »


 Finck? was a disaster.

I wouldn't say Finck was a complete disaster but he did fuck up a few of the solos. All the new songs were fine and I liked his Sweet Child solo (On Albany DVD) but on some of the others he sounded a bit sloppy, like he was missing strings.? People say Guns don't need Bucket either, well if they don't they do need a suitable replacement cos if Finck has trouble pulling off Slash's solos he will have an either harder time pulling off Buckets.? BH has a very distinctive style, one that I would imagine being very hard to replicate and that shredding is unbelievable, Axl had BH there for a reason people.
Quote
Quote
« Last Edit: December 27, 2005, 09:01:49 PM by GNFNR_UK » Logged

'This is just a horrible divorce, now he (Axl) is looking for a new wife.  His ex wife, Duff and Slash, are remarried and happy' - Smoking Guns on the break up of the original GNR.
chinesedemocracy05
Banned
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 263


SPRECHMAN!


« Reply #21 on: December 27, 2005, 09:10:17 PM »

Rock IN Rio wasnt a good show, was like seeing a gnr cover band, but the new songs were great.

Thank you Rock In Rio wasn't a good show at all. There were alot of sound problems, but that doesn't make up for the fact that Axl was just bad that night. If he sings like MSG every nite and the band plays like that every nite we'll be in for a hell of a ride if/when they tour
Logged

They just thought Id know better. Better.
Carlos_f_Rose
Guest
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2005, 12:54:12 AM »

Man, sadly Axl has lost a part of his voice, he sounds way different from those golden days. And the old songs sound kind of funny. I wanted to believe he did that porpousely to return with an excellent voice, only compared with the old days. Now that would be a great strategy, cancelling tours, having bad voice, only to create more expectation, now, thats another dream.
Logged
DunkinDave
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1407

Here Today...


« Reply #23 on: December 28, 2005, 02:14:13 AM »

Rock IN Rio wasnt a good show, was like seeing a gnr cover band, but the new songs were great.

Thank you Rock In Rio wasn't a good show at all. There were alot of sound problems, but that doesn't make up for the fact that Axl was just bad that night. If he sings like MSG every nite and the band plays like that every nite we'll be in for a hell of a ride if/when they tour

If we ever get a soundboard of MSG, it's safe to say his voice will sound just like it did at any other 2002 concert.

Axl's voice was better at Vegas 01 and Rio than it was at any 2002 show.

That's probably because he was in better shape in 2001, and compared to the 2002 shows he didn't run around as much.

So Vegas 01 is the best example of his post-2000 voice because there was less stage space and he was focused more on his vocals than his movement.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2005, 02:25:21 AM by DunkinDave » Logged
Kaybee
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 243


Here Today...


« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2005, 02:25:12 AM »

I didn't think Axl's voice sounded that bad. It didn't blow me away, but it certainly wasn't awful.
Logged
GNFNR_UK
Rocker
***

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 392

I want to believe...


« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2005, 04:13:56 AM »

Rock IN Rio wasnt a good show, was like seeing a gnr cover band, but the new songs were great.

Thank you Rock In Rio wasn't a good show at all. There were alot of sound problems, but that doesn't make up for the fact that Axl was just bad that night. If he sings like MSG every nite and the band plays like that every nite we'll be in for a hell of a ride if/when they tour

If we ever get a soundboard of MSG, it's safe to say his voice will sound just like it did at any other 2002 concert.

Axl's voice was better at Vegas 01 and Rio than it was at any 2002 show.

That's probably because he was in better shape in 2001, and compared to the 2002 shows he didn't run around as much.

So Vegas 01 is the best example of his post-2000 voice because there was less stage space and he was focused more on his vocals than his movement.

I don't think Axl was in better shape in 2001, he looks like he's in worse shape if anything, look at his gut on Rio 2001! I don;t think his voice was better in 01 either except for maybe at the start of 'The Blues' in Rio, I liked it when he did the higher 'You know I tried so hard to make you...' as aposed to his 2002 growl. He was running around too much at Rio, a perfect example of how the running can fuck his singing up is on Maddy Rio, the ahhhhhh part sounds awful cos he's running around.
Logged

'This is just a horrible divorce, now he (Axl) is looking for a new wife.  His ex wife, Duff and Slash, are remarried and happy' - Smoking Guns on the break up of the original GNR.
DunkinDave
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1407

Here Today...


« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2005, 04:21:22 AM »

Rock IN Rio wasnt a good show, was like seeing a gnr cover band, but the new songs were great.

Thank you Rock In Rio wasn't a good show at all. There were alot of sound problems, but that doesn't make up for the fact that Axl was just bad that night. If he sings like MSG every nite and the band plays like that every nite we'll be in for a hell of a ride if/when they tour

If we ever get a soundboard of MSG, it's safe to say his voice will sound just like it did at any other 2002 concert.

Axl's voice was better at Vegas 01 and Rio than it was at any 2002 show.

That's probably because he was in better shape in 2001, and compared to the 2002 shows he didn't run around as much.

So Vegas 01 is the best example of his post-2000 voice because there was less stage space and he was focused more on his vocals than his movement.

I don't think Axl was in better shape in 2001, he looks like he's in worse shape if anything, look at his gut on Rio 2001!

At least he exposed his stomach in 2001, in 2002 he had jerseys on all the time.

What was he hiding?

And his face was fatter in 2002 than it was in 2001.

People forget that between Rio and the North American tour there was almost a 2 year layoff.

Plenty of time for one to gain weight.
Logged
badapple81
Guest
« Reply #27 on: December 28, 2005, 04:31:58 AM »

How surprising..

The thread has turned into a discussion about Axl's weight and 'Robin is a disaster'   Roll Eyes
Logged
Mikkamakka
Daddy Cool
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2242


Half man, half beast


« Reply #28 on: December 28, 2005, 07:58:01 AM »

Quote
Finck and Brain, who is a good drummer, was a disaster.

Brain a disaster?? Huh
are you kidding? His drums was awesome!
Robin wasn't a disaster either, he was really good at rythm, but he fucked-up lots of guitar solos. He seemed very nervous when he had to fill Slash shoes on Lead...it's like if it was the Himalaya for him sometimes (November Rain...)

When they confused the rhythm, it was mostly caused by Brain. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a very good drummer, but didn't take enough time to learn the songs.

Robin's rhythm playing was OK, I would hardly criticize him as a rhythm guitarist, but he played more lead than BH, and if Nu-GN'R ever comes back it's likely that he'll be the first guitarist. And he fails as a lead guitarist. Sometimes he plays good (I like how he plays the Brownstone solo), but more often he makes mistakes he mustn't. It's Guns N' Roses, a guitar band, not NIN, an industrial band where fuck-ups can turn out to be 'good'.

Rehearsals, rehearsals, rehearsals...
Logged

'Once there was this Rock 'N' Roll band
Rollin' on the streets
Time went by and it became a joke'
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3371


Richard Fortus, the phenomenon


« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2005, 08:10:55 AM »

Quote
but he played more lead than BH, and if Nu-GN'R ever comes back it's likely that he'll be the first guitarist.
No, I think it will be 50/50 with Fortus. They will share the guitar parts (rythm + solos)? Cool
Expect Richard to be a world class guitar player once the tour starts.

Quote
Sometimes he plays good (I like how he plays the Brownstone solo), but more often he makes mistakes he mustn't. It's Guns N' Roses, a guitar band, not NIN, an industrial band where fuck-ups can turn out to be 'good'.
I think we will see a different Robin next time. More generally, I do believe a lot of thing will be different. I'm sure we will see a more "Classic-Rock" band next time than the one in 2002. Maybe they will change a few things.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2005, 11:42:13 AM by nesquick » Logged

Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.052 seconds with 19 queries.