of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 25, 2024, 10:26:59 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228746
Posts in
43282
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Guns N' Roses
Guns N' Roses
Guns N' Roses' current record company
0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
...
8
Author
Topic: Guns N' Roses' current record company (Read 37449 times)
Josh
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 142
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #40 on:
June 26, 2017, 08:13:52 PM »
Seems like this has been answered but I actually asked the man himself:
"Universal has Guns under contract but I own the name"
This was from a Dexter chat from December 2008 (so after the CD release) on another fan site. I'm not going to post a link but am sure the full Q&A can be found without too much digging if anyone is interested in the source. I was totally shocked that he answered me, and I believe it was one of the last questions he took that night. Anyway, hope that helps!
Logged
TheBaconman
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 2951
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #41 on:
June 26, 2017, 09:05:24 PM »
Obviously they have a record and distribution deal
This band. With there 4 albums of original material would have no problem ever picking up a deal
I think there is still some unsaid issues with who owns the rest of the CD era recordings
Label or Axl
Logged
allwaystired
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 2455
Here Today...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #42 on:
June 27, 2017, 05:53:15 AM »
Definitely would have no problem getting another deal if they're out of contract. They'd probably go for a one album deal though I think- would make sense for them. Even though record sales aren't what they would be, it would still be a large seller, surely.
Logged
"Beyond the realms of dedication, venturing worryingly deep sometimes into obsessional delusion"
Spirit
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7627
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #43 on:
June 27, 2017, 11:08:02 AM »
Axl himself said at the China Exchange that if there was one thing he regretted from back in the day, it was the band not forming their own label.
It seems to me he'd rather not be under contract with a record label if he could choose.
Logged
Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
D-GenerationX
Legend
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 9814
Just A Monkey In The Wrench
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #44 on:
June 27, 2017, 11:29:21 AM »
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 11:08:02 AM
Axl himself said at the China Exchange that if there was one thing he regretted from back in the day, it was the band not forming their own label.
It seems to me he'd rather not be under contract with a record label if he could choose.
I question that. It gives him a convenient boogeyman.
Logged
I Can Finally Say I Saw Guns N' Roses Without Any Caveats, Qualifiers, Or Preambles. And It Was GLORIOUS. Best Concert Of My Life.
Spirit
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7627
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #45 on:
June 27, 2017, 11:51:32 AM »
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 27, 2017, 11:29:21 AM
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 11:08:02 AM
Axl himself said at the China Exchange that if there was one thing he regretted from back in the day, it was the band not forming their own label.
It seems to me he'd rather not be under contract with a record label if he could choose.
I question that. It gives him a convenient boogeyman.
Maybe. But if the things said by both Stinson and Axl about the process leading up to Chinese Democracy are true, it's more of a frustrating situation for them rather than a convenient part to blame.
It's true, if the public knows that you are the 100% sole responsible for what happens, there are few excuses to use, but we can only speculate to what would've happened. If they had their own label, maybe the record would've come out in 2002?
As for today, I can't recall Axl directly laying any blame on the label for the lack of output since Chinese.
Logged
Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
allwaystired
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 2455
Here Today...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #46 on:
June 27, 2017, 11:57:02 AM »
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 11:51:32 AM
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 27, 2017, 11:29:21 AM
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 11:08:02 AM
Axl himself said at the China Exchange that if there was one thing he regretted from back in the day, it was the band not forming their own label.
It seems to me he'd rather not be under contract with a record label if he could choose.
I question that. It gives him a convenient boogeyman.
Maybe. But if the things said by both Stinson and Axl about the process leading up to Chinese Democracy are true, it's more of a frustrating situation for them rather than a convenient part to blame.
It's true, if the public knows that you are the 100% sole responsible for what happens, there are few excuses to use, but we can only speculate to what would've happened. If they had their own label, maybe the record would've come out in 2002?
As for today, I can't recall Axl directly laying any blame on the label for the lack of output since Chinese.
I just can't envisage a scenario where a label would possibly HINDER any music coming out from GNR at all. Even studio offcuts, poorly recorded would surely be welcomed at this point. They'd sell to a certain element of the fanbase. Anything Axl wanted to release, he could release.
Logged
"Beyond the realms of dedication, venturing worryingly deep sometimes into obsessional delusion"
Spirit
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7627
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #47 on:
June 27, 2017, 12:15:42 PM »
Quote from: allwaystired on June 27, 2017, 11:57:02 AM
I just can't envisage a scenario where a label would possibly HINDER any music coming out from GNR at all. Even studio offcuts, poorly recorded would surely be welcomed at this point. They'd sell to a certain element of the fanbase. Anything Axl wanted to release, he could release.
Not hinder directly, but it's plausible there were measures to slow down the process leading up to Chinese. The label might not have been
that
enthusiastic about Axl continuing the brand on his own.
Logged
Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
TheBaconman
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 2951
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #48 on:
June 27, 2017, 12:18:13 PM »
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 12:15:42 PM
Quote from: allwaystired on June 27, 2017, 11:57:02 AM
I just can't envisage a scenario where a label would possibly HINDER any music coming out from GNR at all. Even studio offcuts, poorly recorded would surely be welcomed at this point. They'd sell to a certain element of the fanbase. Anything Axl wanted to release, he could release.
Not hinder directly, but it's plausible there were measures to slow down the process leading up to Chinese. The label might not have been
that
enthusiastic about Axl continuing the brand on his own.
If the material is already recorded, there is really no cost to the label. Get the music out.
I think the problem is, who owns the recordings. After the label sunk 10 million into the first CD album, do they own all the other associated recordings as well? I think Axl dump some money into the recordings as well, does he own a percentage?
Logged
allwaystired
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 2455
Here Today...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #49 on:
June 27, 2017, 12:55:54 PM »
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 12:15:42 PM
Quote from: allwaystired on June 27, 2017, 11:57:02 AM
I just can't envisage a scenario where a label would possibly HINDER any music coming out from GNR at all. Even studio offcuts, poorly recorded would surely be welcomed at this point. They'd sell to a certain element of the fanbase. Anything Axl wanted to release, he could release.
Not hinder directly, but it's plausible there were measures to slow down the process leading up to Chinese. The label might not have been
that
enthusiastic about Axl continuing the brand on his own.
Surely though it's more likely the label wanted to speed up the process? Doesn't everything point towards the label becoming increasingly impatient about getting CD out, and recouping some of their investment?
Logged
"Beyond the realms of dedication, venturing worryingly deep sometimes into obsessional delusion"
Spirit
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7627
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #50 on:
June 27, 2017, 02:46:04 PM »
Quote from: allwaystired on June 27, 2017, 12:55:54 PM
Quote from: Spirit on June 27, 2017, 12:15:42 PM
Quote from: allwaystired on June 27, 2017, 11:57:02 AM
I just can't envisage a scenario where a label would possibly HINDER any music coming out from GNR at all. Even studio offcuts, poorly recorded would surely be welcomed at this point. They'd sell to a certain element of the fanbase. Anything Axl wanted to release, he could release.
Not hinder directly, but it's plausible there were measures to slow down the process leading up to Chinese. The label might not have been
that
enthusiastic about Axl continuing the brand on his own.
Surely though it's more likely the label wanted to speed up the process? Doesn't everything point towards the label becoming increasingly impatient about getting CD out, and recouping some of their investment?
The final 2-3 years yes. The beginning of the 2000s was different I think.
Logged
Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
zombux
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1686
watching the sky moves sideways...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #51 on:
June 27, 2017, 03:10:22 PM »
what's the point of having a record company, if you're not going to actually release anything at all?
Logged
>>
CHINESE WHISPERS - THE MOST COMPLETE GNR HISTORY 1993 - 2008
<<
D-GenerationX
Legend
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 9814
Just A Monkey In The Wrench
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #52 on:
June 28, 2017, 08:47:01 AM »
Quote from: zombux on June 27, 2017, 03:10:22 PM
what's the point of having a record company, if you're not going to actually release anything at all?
True.
And it's why I think they are a convenient boogeyman. Look how many people around here swallow that wholesale.
Why is nothing happening? Well, it must be those bastard covered bastards with bastard filling at that evil record company. Thwarting that hardest working man in show business, Axl Rose, at every opportunity. If only those pricks would get out of the way, we'd be swimming in albums!
That's easier for some to say without giving it too much of a critical thought, then having to concede Axl just doesn't really care about that end of the operation anymore. And hasn't for years.
Logged
I Can Finally Say I Saw Guns N' Roses Without Any Caveats, Qualifiers, Or Preambles. And It Was GLORIOUS. Best Concert Of My Life.
JAEBALL
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3439
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #53 on:
June 28, 2017, 08:58:41 AM »
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 28, 2017, 08:47:01 AM
Quote from: zombux on June 27, 2017, 03:10:22 PM
what's the point of having a record company, if you're not going to actually release anything at all?
True.
And it's why I think they are a convenient boogeyman. Look how many people around here swallow that wholesale.
Why is nothing happening? Well, it must be those bastard covered bastards with bastard filling at that evil record company. Thwarting that hardest working man in show business, Axl Rose, at every opportunity. If only those pricks would get out of the way, we'd be swimming in albums!
That's easier for some to say without giving it too much of a critical thought, then having to concede Axl just doesn't really care about that end of the operation anymore. And hasn't for years.
Both sides to the coin take it to the extreme in my opinion. Saying Axl doesn't care is probably foolish.
IMO the label was only willing to go far with Axl and eventually got fed up with him... and in return... his take is that they were not supportive.
..and then there's just probably some part of him that doesn't feel the need to release what he has. Especially at this point...
Frustrating for us...but understandable.
Logged
Axl Rose IS Skeletor
allwaystired
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 2455
Here Today...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #54 on:
June 28, 2017, 09:01:50 AM »
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 28, 2017, 08:47:01 AM
Quote from: zombux on June 27, 2017, 03:10:22 PM
what's the point of having a record company, if you're not going to actually release anything at all?
True.
And it's why I think they are a convenient boogeyman. Look how many people around here swallow that wholesale.
Why is nothing happening? Well, it must be those bastard covered bastards with bastard filling at that evil record company. Thwarting that hardest working man in show business, Axl Rose, at every opportunity. If only those pricks would get out of the way, we'd be swimming in albums!
That's easier for some to say without giving it too much of a critical thought, then having to concede Axl just doesn't really care about that end of the operation anymore. And hasn't for years.
Perhaps he cares too much though. He got a bit of a mualing for CD, and maybe that's thrown him totally, confidence wise. He knows he can't be criticised for something people haven't heard. It could easily be fear.
Logged
"Beyond the realms of dedication, venturing worryingly deep sometimes into obsessional delusion"
D-GenerationX
Legend
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 9814
Just A Monkey In The Wrench
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #55 on:
June 28, 2017, 09:05:36 AM »
Quote from: JAEBALL on June 28, 2017, 08:58:41 AM
Both sides to the coin take it to the extreme in my opinion. Saying Axl doesn't care is probably foolish.
IMO the label was only willing to go far with Axl and eventually got fed up with him... and in return... his take is that they were not supportive.
I think this is the right read. I'm sure the label was none too pleased at the whole CD release debacle. And then Axl, in turn, wasn't happy with them.
Both sides basiclaly retreated to mutual state of
"fuck me? no...fuck you"
and nothing else got done.
The reason I say Axl doesn't care is that Universal is hardly sitting on pins and needles waiting on what Axl Rose may or may not ever do for them. And he certainly has a phone that dials out. If he were to make that move, I can't imagine it makes much sense for Universal to stay mad at him from what happened in 2008.
But I see no evidence that call has been made. And just thinking about it logicallly, I can't see what Universal would have to gain telling him to go fuck himself, if and when he ever does. All the more so since he has a band now that most people would be willing to accept as Guns N' Roses, thus making it a more attractive product in the marketplace.
Logged
I Can Finally Say I Saw Guns N' Roses Without Any Caveats, Qualifiers, Or Preambles. And It Was GLORIOUS. Best Concert Of My Life.
D-GenerationX
Legend
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 9814
Just A Monkey In The Wrench
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #56 on:
June 28, 2017, 09:08:39 AM »
Quote from: allwaystired on June 28, 2017, 09:01:50 AM
Perhaps he cares too much though. He got a bit of a mualing for CD, and maybe that's thrown him totally, confidence wise. He knows he can't be criticised for something people haven't heard. It could easily be fear.
Oh, I totally agree.
That whole Magical Mystery Vault has enough baggage to fill a 747. Which is why I think he should just set it all on fucking fire and start over with his current line-up.
If there is one killer riff or two worth saving, fine. Bring it to the new guys and let them put a spin on it. But otherwise, free yourself of all that stuff and start fresh.
He looks so happy now. Build on that. Don't start looking backwards to bad memories and drama.
Logged
I Can Finally Say I Saw Guns N' Roses Without Any Caveats, Qualifiers, Or Preambles. And It Was GLORIOUS. Best Concert Of My Life.
allwaystired
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 2455
Here Today...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #57 on:
June 28, 2017, 09:14:09 AM »
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 28, 2017, 09:08:39 AM
Quote from: allwaystired on June 28, 2017, 09:01:50 AM
Perhaps he cares too much though. He got a bit of a mualing for CD, and maybe that's thrown him totally, confidence wise. He knows he can't be criticised for something people haven't heard. It could easily be fear.
Oh, I totally agree.
That whole Magical Mystery Vault has enough baggage to fill a 747. Which is why I think he should just set it all on fucking fire and start over with his current line-up.
If there is one killer riff or two worth saving, fine. Bring it to the new guys and let them put a spin on it. But otherwise, free yourself of all that stuff and start fresh.
He looks so happy now. Build on that. Don't start looking backwards to bad memories and drama.
I agree. I's speculate that his confidence is building on a live basis again, but I think we've got a while to go yet before he feels like letting anyone into anything new music wise. Wild speculation of course.
Logged
"Beyond the realms of dedication, venturing worryingly deep sometimes into obsessional delusion"
TheBaconman
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 2951
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #58 on:
June 28, 2017, 09:22:53 AM »
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 28, 2017, 08:47:01 AM
Quote from: zombux on June 27, 2017, 03:10:22 PM
what's the point of having a record company, if you're not going to actually release anything at all?
True.
And it's why I think they are a convenient boogeyman. Look how many people around here swallow that wholesale.
Why is nothing happening? Well, it must be those bastard covered bastards with bastard filling at that evil record company. Thwarting that hardest working man in show business, Axl Rose, at every opportunity. If only those pricks would get out of the way, we'd be swimming in albums!
That's easier for some to say without giving it too much of a critical thought, then having to concede Axl just doesn't really care about that end of the operation anymore. And hasn't for years.
I havnt seen one of these pro Axl anti label doom and gloom posts in a very long time
What I do see all the time is
"They are on a world tour. Wait till everyone in the world has had the chance to see them, in there individual city many times, in multiple venues. Or if 2021 comes sooner then we can ask for new music"
I honestly think the general public couldn care less about a new gnr record If it comes out. Cool. If it never comes out. Oh well.
I honestly think the hard core fans have just given up talking about it. No more blame the label. No more speculating on what may happen. Just look at the huge lack of posts around here
Logged
Ginger King
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1209
Now we all know better...
Re: Guns N' Roses' current record company
«
Reply #59 on:
June 28, 2017, 09:23:25 AM »
Quote from: allwaystired on June 28, 2017, 09:01:50 AM
Quote from: D-GenerationX on June 28, 2017, 08:47:01 AM
Quote from: zombux on June 27, 2017, 03:10:22 PM
what's the point of having a record company, if you're not going to actually release anything at all?
True.
And it's why I think they are a convenient boogeyman. Look how many people around here swallow that wholesale.
Why is nothing happening? Well, it must be those bastard covered bastards with bastard filling at that evil record company. Thwarting that hardest working man in show business, Axl Rose, at every opportunity. If only those pricks would get out of the way, we'd be swimming in albums!
That's easier for some to say without giving it too much of a critical thought, then having to concede Axl just doesn't really care about that end of the operation anymore. And hasn't for years.
Perhaps he cares too much though. He got a bit of a mualing for CD, and maybe that's thrown him totally, confidence wise. He knows he can't be criticised for something people haven't heard. It could easily be fear.
That's what I never really understood. If I recall, the reviews for CD when it came out were good. The "media" wasn't trashing it. Now, that didn't translate well to album sales (although I think some here think the album sold just fine) so maybe that's why he checked out. It can't be because the artwork wasn't finished...right?
Logged
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
...
8
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...