Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 29, 2024, 08:03:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228810 Posts in 43285 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Guns N' Roses
| | |-+  Izzy's "demotion"
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 16 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Izzy's "demotion"  (Read 63996 times)
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #120 on: November 08, 2015, 08:33:48 PM »

My issue with it... is that you guys are so hung up on the name and not the entity..

Same thing with the evolution of "Guns N Roses" ... GNR didn't evolve ... it completely changed.. there's a big difference. It just used the same band name on the concert tickets. Axl... he evolved his sound... the band...they left...and then the band that changed the sound... they left too ! (which is truly unfortunate)


Let me re phrase... I don't have an issue with it, I could care less what a handful of you think about what the "original" band consisted of. I just don't understand why the name of the band seems to be so confusing. It's all moot doe.





You are wrong, Guns N' Roses did Evolve-

e?volve
ēˈv?lv/
verb
1.
develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
"the company has evolved into a major chemical manufacturer"
synonyms:   develop, progress, advance
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
Virolec
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 198


« Reply #121 on: November 08, 2015, 08:53:47 PM »

Decay is also a gradual change, of course...  Tongue

Logged

Nargle them.  Fargle them.  Nargle-fargle them.
TheBaconman
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2951


« Reply #122 on: November 08, 2015, 09:15:44 PM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR
Logged
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #123 on: November 08, 2015, 10:52:47 PM »

Decay is also a gradual change, of course...  Tongue



And trolling is a form of decayed thinking Cheesy
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #124 on: November 08, 2015, 10:56:29 PM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
Spirit
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7637



« Reply #125 on: November 08, 2015, 11:02:22 PM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

According to Axl himself he thinks of it as "Old Guns" and "Guns".
Logged

Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #126 on: November 08, 2015, 11:05:16 PM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

According to Axl himself he thinks of it as "Old Guns" and "Guns".

Right, from the 08 chats Smiley
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
Spirit
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7637



« Reply #127 on: November 08, 2015, 11:07:41 PM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

According to Axl himself he thinks of it as "Old Guns" and "Guns".

Right, from the 08 chats Smiley

Yes, so it seems he thinks there's some divide there.
Logged

Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #128 on: November 08, 2015, 11:12:05 PM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

According to Axl himself he thinks of it as "Old Guns" and "Guns".

Right, from the 08 chats Smiley

Yes, so it seems he thinks there's some divide there.

I wasn't debating the need to differentiate line ups, I was more remarking on some peoples' (Trolls) tendencies to use the term "new GNR" or "NuGNR" as another way to disrespect the band and demean the lineup and insinuate that it is inferior or not fully GNR.

All my tickets, merch, albums say Guns N' Roses-period.

I generally differentiate between the lineups by using a year, like GNR circa 2011, but that's just me.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2015, 11:18:51 PM by EmilyGNR » Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
Spirit
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7637



« Reply #129 on: November 08, 2015, 11:24:15 PM »

Is Axl disrespecting the old line-up by calling them "Old Guns" then? Just using the same logic the other way around.

For the record, I don't think either Axl or the fans calling the line-ups Old- or New-GNR are doing so in disrespect, it's generally to differantiate between pre- and post-1995 Guns I think.
Logged

Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #130 on: November 08, 2015, 11:31:26 PM »

Is Axl disrespecting the old line-up by calling them "Old Guns" then? Just using the same logic the other way around.

For the record, I don't think either Axl or the fans calling the line-ups Old- or New-GNR are doing so in disrespect, it's generally to differantiate between pre- and post-1995 Guns I think.

That is totally different and I disagree-not the same logic nor a valid comparison in the least.

If you visit other online forums you can clearly see many trolls and haters labelling the band as "NuGNR" or "Axl's band" as a show of disrespect and an attempt at demeaning newer lineups - it is a common occurrence.

It is GNR, whether some like it or don't, they don't get to decide what GNR is and what it isn't.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2015, 11:35:19 PM by EmilyGNR » Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
raindogs70
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 475


« Reply #131 on: November 08, 2015, 11:53:50 PM »

Izzy was a crucial part of Guns N' Roses for the first 4-5 years, but then it just seemed like he showed disinterest in even being there. He probably should have just left after AFD and just contributed as a songwriter. Duff never stopped working with Izzy so maybe some new GNR songs could come out of them writing with Axl. Whether those songs would ever see the light of day is another story.
Logged
TheBaconman
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2951


« Reply #132 on: November 09, 2015, 11:27:29 AM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

Again

I wasn't talking about the line ups changing.   

Guns lineup has changed from 85-2015...   Yes..  I don't know why you keep bringing this up, as it has nothing to do with what I am talking about

Logged
Wooody
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2155

Here Today...


« Reply #133 on: November 09, 2015, 11:37:37 AM »

There is a different between New GNR and NUGNR.

NUGNR comes from the period NUMETAL was in the radio and everyone with a bit of good taste hated it.

NUGNR is derogatory. New GNR is not.

Logged

Just use your head and in the end you'll find your inspiration.
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #134 on: November 09, 2015, 11:40:52 AM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

Again

I wasn't talking about the line ups changing.   

Guns lineup has changed from 85-2015...   Yes..  I don't know why you keep bringing this up, as it has nothing to do with what I am talking about



You said you believed the evolution began in 95, I disagree and think it has been going on longer.
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
TheBaconman
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2951


« Reply #135 on: November 09, 2015, 11:43:49 AM »

And there is a difference between talking about how the business structure worked in guns apposed to how the lineups are

I refer to old gnr, as 1995 and prior.  When there was actual full time band members with equal say.  (was!, not all)

I refer to new gnr, as 1995 to present.  After Axl quit, started the business fresh, tried to make everyone employees and gone where the full time band members with equal say..
Logged
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #136 on: November 09, 2015, 11:45:39 AM »

There is a different between New GNR and NUGNR.

NUGNR comes from the period NUMETAL was in the radio and everyone with a bit of good taste hated it.

NUGNR is derogatory. New GNR is not.



I find that various disgruntled fans, bitter little haters, and trolls of all kinds actually employ both of those terms to attempt to disparage and discredit the later lineups.

I'm sure some fans don't mean it that way.

It is GNR, my tickets, my Albums, and all my memorabilia says Guns N' Roses- not New or NU.
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
Wooody
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2155

Here Today...


« Reply #137 on: November 09, 2015, 11:46:08 AM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

that's where you and me disagree in our point of view. You consider GNR to be GNR when it got the name. I consider GNR to be GNR when it got an identity. You seem to consider evolution as the revolving door of musicians, I consider evolution the sound of the band. One band member leaving may not impact the sound of the band, but deciding to drastically change the sound of the band does. However I don't think Axl actually achieved it. Adding little farts to better doesnt make it industrial. To me Chinese Democracy does sound like a GNR album. That's why I say there's not much evolution.
UYI evolved much more from AFD, not because it had Matt Sorum, but because Axl and Slash drove their sound in uncharted territory
Logged

Just use your head and in the end you'll find your inspiration.
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #138 on: November 09, 2015, 11:47:58 AM »

And there is a difference between talking about how the business structure worked in guns apposed to how the lineups are

I refer to old gnr, as 1995 and prior.  When there was actual full time band members with equal say.  (was!, not all)

I refer to new gnr, as 1995 to present.  After Axl quit, started the business fresh, tried to make everyone employees and gone where the full time band members with equal say..


I don't make the division there and most certainly don't employ your questionable and debatable constraints and descriptions.
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
EmilyGNR
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2512


GNR Loyalty


« Reply #139 on: November 09, 2015, 11:51:45 AM »

I think there were two evolutions of guns n roses

You have the original one up until 1995

Then you have the version that Axl started over again.  Once he quit the original

No, the original lineup did not last until 1995.

This might come in handy for you Cheesy
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/history/index.html

Disclaimer: By knowing and acknowledging the actual history of GNR does not in any way mean I dislike,or discredit any member of any lineup.

I wasn't talking about the line-up.

I was talking about the business structure of Guns.

From all accounts is was pretty straight forward up until 1995 (regardless of the lineups)   People came and went

But

It was only in 1995, when Axl quit.  That the evolution began.  Were all full time members were asked to become employees under Axls new GNR

No, I disagree- GNR has been evolving since Tracii and Rob and Ole were replaced by Slash, Duff, and Steven.

It continued when Steven was replaced by Matt, Dizzy was added, and again when Izzy was replaced by Gilby and so on.

There is no such thing as "new GNR" it is GNR.

that's where you and me disagree in our point of view. You consider GNR to be GNR when it got the name. I consider GNR to be GNR when it got an identity. You seem to consider evolution as the revolving door of musicians, I consider evolution the sound of the band. One band member leaving may not impact the sound of the band, but deciding to drastically change the sound of the band does. However I don't think Axl actually achieved it. Adding little farts to better doesnt make it industrial. To me Chinese Democracy does sound like a GNR album. That's why I say there's not much evolution.
UYI evolved much more from AFD, not because it had Matt Sorum, but because Axl and Slash drove their sound in uncharted territory


Nobody added "little farts" to the music. It's very clear what your direction and agenda is here.

I personally think Chinese Democracy was an evolution from the UYIs much like they were from Appetite.
Logged

"Shut the fuck up."
Unknown famous philosopher and guru
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 16 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 18 queries.