Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 22, 2024, 11:07:13 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228098 Posts in 43259 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
| |-+  Solo & side projects + Ex-members
| | |-+  Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
| | | |-+  Slash Says Guns N' Roses Purists Take His Music 'Too Seriously'
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: Slash Says Guns N' Roses Purists Take His Music 'Too Seriously'  (Read 8721 times)
FunkyMonkey
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 11085



« on: April 27, 2010, 03:15:59 PM »

Slash Says Guns N' Roses Purists Take His Music 'Too Seriously'

Apr 27th 2010

When it came time to decide on a bonus track for his eponymous debut album, former Guns N' Roses guitarist Slash decided to include a slowed-down, hip-hop version of his former band's 1988 Top 10 single 'Paradise City' featuring the unexpected tandem of Cypress Hill and Fergie of the Black Eyed Peas.

"I've been playing 'Paradise City' with Cypress Hill since 2002 -- I just love the way they do the verses -- and we always have somebody come up and do the chorus," Slash explains to Spinner of the collaboration's genesis. "I always said, 'one of these days, we've got to record this' and here we were, seven years later.

"I had the Cypress Hill guys come down [to the studio] and I'd just done 'Beautiful Dangerous' with Fergie so I said, 'why don't you sing the chorus?' just for the hell of it."

Before releasing the track in North America, the guitar god decided to give it a test run with Japanese audiences.

"I put it out as a B-side of a Japanese single and, of course, it cruised around the internet," he recalls. "I had all the Guns N' Roses purists that were really pissed off about it and I had all these other people that really liked it."

Despite the mixed reaction, the guitarist ultimately decided to include the new 'Paradise City' on the deluxe edition because, as he says with a smirk, "I just figured some people are taking it a little too seriously."

http://www.spinner.com/2010/04/27/slash-guns-n-roses/
Logged

Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
oldgunsfan
Legend
*****

Karma: -4
Offline Offline

Posts: 2264

Here Today...


« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2010, 03:22:59 PM »

reading the quotes on this board and this quote is poved every day
Logged
faldor
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7700


I'm Ron Burgundy?


WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2010, 03:27:27 PM »

I don't necessarily have a problem with him re-making Paradise City, but I absolutely HATED the version with Cypress Hill from the first time I heard it 9 years ago.  It's just not my style.  It doesn't quite have the same touch as Run DMC and Aerosmith did with "Walk This Way".  I notice Cypress Hill is playing with some other rock group on some song that's out now.
Logged

If you're waiting...don't. Live your life. That's your responsibility not mine. If it were not to happen you won't have missed a thing. If in fact it does you might get something that works for you.
svdv22
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 811


This is not a piano falling out of the sky


WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2010, 04:10:54 PM »

I guess I'm one of those people who take that song too serious.
It just sucks.
Ass.
Tongue
I like the rest of the album though
Logged

chineseblues
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3209


23/11/08


WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2010, 04:18:47 PM »

Of course people are going to take it serious when he makes a shitty version of it. Did he really think people would be ok with him re-recording this song with cypress hill and fergie of all people?
Logged
sleeper
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 309



« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2010, 04:41:03 PM »

I liked it. Smiley
Logged
lynn1961
Jaded Cupcake
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1814



« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2010, 12:01:23 AM »

I liked it. Smiley

Me too..... Wink
Logged
Smoking Guns
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3392


War Damn Eagle


« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2010, 12:04:27 AM »

as did i....
Logged
Bodhi
Legend
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2885


« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2010, 01:01:54 AM »

I liked the Fergie parts, but could have done without Cypress Hill.  I would have preferred it if she sang the whole thing.  YES he is totally right about people taking it too seriously. It was done as a "jam" with a few friends, not as a piece of art that needs to be critiqued. 
Logged
Bridge
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1703


We play rock n roll to kick your ass.


« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2010, 03:37:27 AM »

I would've preferred the whole thing with Fergie as well.  But Slash is correct, people will always take it too seriously.  But I can't say I fault everyone for doing that, as I myself hated Axl's 1999 cover of "Sweet Child o Mine" with other musicians.
Logged
AxlsMainMan
Dazed & Confused
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7631



WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2010, 04:05:41 AM »

Of course people are going to take it serious when he makes a shitty version of it. Did he really think people would be ok with him re-recording this song with cypress hill and fergie of all people?

Hilariously, the people who actually liked this horrific rendition of a classic also disliked Chinese Democracy. Maybe they took it "too seriously." hihi
Logged

5.12.06
9.20 & 21.06
9.23.06
11.15.06
11.17.06
11.25.06
1.16 & 17.10
1.24 & 25.10
1.28.10
1.31.10
11.28.11
10.31.12
11.02 & 03.12
7.12.13
7.16.16
8.21.17
10.29 & 30.17
FunkyMonkey
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 11085



« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2010, 01:23:27 PM »

Some more "comments" here:

SLASH Says GUNS N' ROSES 'Purists' Took 'Paradise City' Re-Recording 'A Little Too Seriously' - Apr. 28, 2010

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=139280

Logged

Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
LunsJail
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2058


Mark it zero!!!


« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2010, 01:42:26 PM »

It was done as a "jam" with a few friends, not as a piece of art that needs to be critiqued. 

Then play it live all you want instead of recording and releasing it as part of your album.
Logged

You should have seen the cover they wanted to do. It wasn't a glove, believe me.
svdv22
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 811


This is not a piano falling out of the sky


WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2010, 01:46:23 PM »

It was done as a "jam" with a few friends, not as a piece of art that needs to be critiqued. 

Then play it live all you want instead of recording and releasing it as part of your album.

Exactly.
Logged

Bodhi
Legend
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2885


« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2010, 01:51:46 PM »

It was done as a "jam" with a few friends, not as a piece of art that needs to be critiqued. 

Then play it live all you want instead of recording and releasing it as part of your album.

Exactly.

couldnt agree more.  I was happy it was not on the U.S release.  Its not a bad idea for a b-side, but I dont like it being attached to the Slash album, cause that brings the whole GNR thing into play and Slash's album really has nothing to do with GNR.  Like I said I didnt mind the Fergie parts but its not something im really going to listen to.  I heard it once or twice and that was about all I need for the rest of my life.
Logged
D
Deliverance Banjo Player
Legend
*****

Karma: -5
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 22289


I am Back!!!!!!


WWW
« Reply #15 on: April 28, 2010, 07:04:06 PM »

I dont like it but i do agree with what he said

i mean Paradise city isnt the deepest GNR song ever made.. its been played and commercialized to death anyway


if he redid NR or Estranged or something, yeah, id be leading the pitchforks.. but PC.. who cares.

i think it sucks but i really dont care either way
Logged

Who Says You Can't Go Home to HTGTH?
One.In.A.Million
Guest
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2010, 08:08:41 PM »

I don't think Slash realised how much a vocal change would affect the song. I think Slash thought as long as his playing the guitar parts, no one will care what's on top.

As someone's already said, in a live environment, it's a bit of fun, like a jam. But I think it was a step too far to think about including it on an official release, especially when the vocals are less than desirable.  hihi

Logged
Bridge
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1703


We play rock n roll to kick your ass.


« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2010, 12:47:20 AM »

Hilariously, the people who actually liked this horrific rendition of a classic also disliked Chinese Democracy. Maybe they took it "too seriously." hihi

Really, you studied statistics and determined that ALL (or even most) of those who liked the new version all hated Axl's album?  Quite the researcher there!

I don't care for either the new "Paradise City" or most of Chinese Democracy.  I guess I take it ALL too seriously!
Logged
kukol1978
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 271


« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2010, 03:52:45 AM »

im sure that if Slash would hear a bad cover of wild horses(for ex),played with britney spears and keith richars would though WTF?.

We can think this too.
Logged
AxlsMainMan
Dazed & Confused
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7631



WWW
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2010, 05:40:47 AM »

Hilariously, the people who actually liked this horrific rendition of a classic also disliked Chinese Democracy. Maybe they took it "too seriously." hihi

Really, you studied statistics and determined that ALL (or even most) of those who liked the new version all hated Axl's album?  Quite the researcher there!

Yeah, checking half a dozen post histories really ate up my evening hihi

I don't care for either the new "Paradise City" or most of Chinese Democracy.  I guess I take it ALL too seriously!

Or maybe have a calendar for 1987 still on the wall Shocked

Logged

5.12.06
9.20 & 21.06
9.23.06
11.15.06
11.17.06
11.25.06
1.16 & 17.10
1.24 & 25.10
1.28.10
1.31.10
11.28.11
10.31.12
11.02 & 03.12
7.12.13
7.16.16
8.21.17
10.29 & 30.17
Pages: [1] 2  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 19 queries.