Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 28, 2024, 07:37:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228806 Posts in 43285 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
| |-+  Solo & side projects + Ex-members
| | |-+  Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
| | | |-+  Paradise Taken from Slash
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Paradise Taken from Slash  (Read 2558 times)
BumbleBuzz
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 335


Guns N' Roses Strong Since 1999!


« on: March 20, 2010, 06:55:02 AM »

Due to legal reasons, Slash's collaboration with BLACK EYED PEAS singer Fergie (a.k.a. Stacy Ann Ferguson) on a new recording of the GUNS N' ROSES classic "Paradise City", also featuring CYPRESS HILL, has had to be withdrawn from the limited-edition deluxe version of Slash's upcoming self-titled solo debut.

Fans should note that a brand new track, "Back From Cali" (featuring Myles Kennedy) has now been added and that the exclusive "Baby Can't Drive" (featuring Alice Cooper and Nicole Scherzinger) still remains.

I'd like to say that I agree with this personally because I personally hate this version of the track
« Last Edit: March 20, 2010, 06:58:06 AM by BumbleBuzz » Logged

2006.06.09 - Dublin, Ireland
2006.07.29 - London, England
2010.09.01 - Dublin, Ireland
2012.05.17 - Dublin, Ireland
2012.05.23 - Newcastle, England
2017.07.17 - London, England
Ashba Rocks
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 98


All things are possible, I am unstopable


« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2010, 07:36:26 AM »

I wonder what the legal reason is. It was released on the single Huh
Logged

"No one can make you, do what they want to"
Halo69
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1191


Here Today...


« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2010, 09:21:10 AM »

well probably same to do with Guitar Hero. Slash is still presenting himself as a GNR member instead of GNR former member, and keeps playing songs from GUNS like he's still in the band.
As for the playing, he can play them all he wants... Recording though... requires authorization, which it would have to come from Axl and Universal... so we all know what happened from there hihi
Logged

Oh My God i cant deny this...
gnrjanus
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1092

Here Today...


« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2010, 11:08:31 AM »

They have authorization they don't need it cause all band members have the rights to the songs from AFD...  but not UYI
Logged
One.In.A.Million
Guest
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2010, 12:13:18 PM »

I have no problem with Slash, but some of the stuff he has done live recently has been questionable in my view. I have no idea why he would want to put a re-recorded version of paradise city on his new record. There is obviously a problem with the legal side of this, whether it's to do with the rights to the song or anything else is anybodys guess.


Lee
Logged
D
Deliverance Banjo Player
Legend
*****

Karma: -5
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 22289


I am Back!!!!!!


WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 12:17:09 PM »

I don't know... I tend to lean towards Slash realizing how much the hardcore fanbase hates it and this is an easy way to take it off the album without having to admit it was a bad idea

if it were a legal issue, he'd be sued for putting it on the Sahara single which to my knowledge he hasnt been sued...



It is a brilliant idea IMO. Kinda the Run Dmc/Aerosmith walk this way

its just it needs Axl to do it with an awesome current big time rapper.. like an Axl,Eminem,50 cent kinda collab which would be off the charts with Axl singing the chorus.
Logged

Who Says You Can't Go Home to HTGTH?
Bill 213
Legend
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1954

The buck stops here!


« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2010, 06:29:19 PM »

I don't know... I tend to lean towards Slash realizing how much the hardcore fanbase hates it and this is an easy way to take it off the album without having to admit it was a bad idea

if it were a legal issue, he'd be sued for putting it on the Sahara single which to my knowledge he hasnt been sued...



It is a brilliant idea IMO. Kinda the Run Dmc/Aerosmith walk this way

its just it needs Axl to do it with an awesome current big time rapper.. like an Axl,Eminem,50 cent kinda collab which would be off the charts with Axl singing the chorus.

Or not disgrace the song at all like Slash's version did.  Leave it be I say.  It was horrible.
Logged

There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
gnrjanus
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1092

Here Today...


« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2010, 06:32:11 PM »

come on, it wasn't that bad..
it was just a version he did... and I think all the musicians did a great job.

Logged
m_rated96
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 269


slash slash slash


WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2010, 03:06:14 AM »

yeah i dont hate the version that much; i think mainstream fans would dig it.

problem is, only hardcore fans would be the ones hearing it unless he released it as a single.

as for legal problems, while all the band members have ROYALTIES, i believe paradise is the intellectual property of only slash, axl and duff. It probably can't be released without the express permission of the 3 of them.

 furthermore, use of the guns n roses name for record sales; could be an issue there
Logged
AxlReznor
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1428


Alternative Monkey


« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2010, 05:04:13 AM »

http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=59358.0
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.035 seconds with 19 queries.