Batman "The Dark Knight"

[Lisa]

I just saw it tonight! finally!
all I can say is R.I.P Heath Ledger

[D]

I have the greatest Avatar ever

[LeftToDecay]

I have the greatest Avatar ever

!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=52741.0 !!!!!!!!!!!!

[Izzy]

yeah he did ... someone really should have seen the movie before posting.

two face isnt dead...the coin landed heads up when he fell....ive heard from multiple places that he is in the next one..

Was Two Face's dead body, Batman checking the body for life and the subsequent funeral not proof enough he's dead?

Two Face should return - but Nolan ain't clever enough for that so instead we'll get a small battalion of lesser villians squeezed into a running time now exceeding 4 hrs

Possible storylines for Batman 3 could include:

Why direct hits from RPG's dent police cars but destroy Batmobiles

How a man with broken ankles walks within hours of the event

Where a fugitive gets a trendy half burnt suit in just a couple of hours

How Commissoner Gordon's maths is shot to hell

How 30 million phones have built in sonar devices

...they got plenty to work with, and if thats not enough they could tie in with the first film and address things like how a ''microwave gun'' vaporises water in pipes but in the human body

Why so serious?!

You don't enjoy movies much, do you?

No, not really

But I did enjoy the Dark Knight - i saw it before any of you did via an advanced screening and then saw it again straight after.

I cant help that I pay attention, ya know not everyone is this world is some brain dead republican voting trailer park urchin

The Dark Knight was a stupid, overlong and very poorly written film

...but i enjoyed it for its daftness (wrecked tumbler can still ''transform'' into Batpod) and Heath Ledger's performance

[Izzy]

He only likes Michael Bay movies, here's the script he was hoping for:

Actually i dont like any Michael Bay film and thought Transformers was pretty dreadful

I did like the transformation effects though

[Jim]

But I did enjoy the Dark Knight - i saw it before any of you did via an advanced screening and then saw it again straight after.

You're a laugh a minute. You saw, err,

Just saw it

... You saw it on the 23rd? Wow, a full... (2, 3, 4...) week after the Aussie and US release dates. Big man.

If you saw it on the 23rd, I could have seen it then too!, via an advanced screening. Well, I couldn't have, or I would have done. I was working.

Speaking of which, if you were working with British release dates, then I saw Transformers about three weeks before it got its release over here. Via an advanced screening!, no less. And you're right. It was shit. Anyway. Testicles away for the time being.

I loved his character and the depth it showed - most villians have some very obvious back story, with the Joker we got to know him in a far more intresting way

He was also a commentary on the world we live in - the rules we are bound by, the Joker was the only one in the film  truly 'free' - but at what cost does freeom come? For all the rules, and red tape we wade through in our lives - isnt it chilling to see what true freedom looks like?

People need merely read this thread through to see what a joke you can be! Lets face it... You just cannot bear to bring yourself to side with the masses.

And I don't blame you. But for all your intellectual bravado, why can you not just accept that it was two and a half hours well spent? That is all everything boils down to; wasted time. And rightly so. But when you don't feel that it has been wasted there should be absolutely no problem. But there usually is. Why does there have to be a footnote to everything with you!

[D]

Gotta agree with Jim.

why would u sit through a 2 and a half movie TWICE if it sucks so bad?

[Robman?]

He only likes Michael Bay movies, here's the script he was hoping for:

Actually i dont like any Michael Bay film and thought Transformers was pretty dreadful

I did like the transformation effects though

What about the tits? 

[w.axl.rose]

TDK is #1 again in the box office 

here are the top two

1 The Dark Knight             Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution    $26,030,000    $441,541,000
2 Pineapple Express    Sony Pictures Releasing                    $22,400,000    $40,474,000    

ill give it about a month before it reaches 500 million

[AxlsMainMan]

Danny Devito as a villain Equals Horrible idea. Who the fuck can take him seriously?

Thats like Corey Feldman being a tough guy. just unbelievable.

I don't know, I thought Jim Carrey transitioned to serious roles pretty well in The Truman Show, Man on the Moon, and The Majestic.

[St_Jimmyuk]

someone in the UK paper "the sun" reviewed it saying that heath ledger was nothing special and that anyone could do the role in future films if needed.
However i do not agree at all, i thought he was fantastic and anyone else doing the role will have a very hard time trying to do it in the same way

Views people?

oh and for uk members i do not buy the sun im a times man

[$$$$]

i dunno i found it slightly boring. the joker was entertaining though, if it weren't for Heath i probably would have fallen asleep

[The Dog]

FINALLY saw this movie.

VERY entertaining. I'll prob see it again in the theaters (IMAX next time) and I rarely do that.  The ending was great, can't wait to see how the 3rd one goes with Bats on the run...

I've heard there are talks of Johnny Depp playing the Riddler.  I pray its just talk.

I personally feel they should go a new route and show someone we haven't seen yet.  Clayface would be great.  But it seems they want to keep the newer Batmans more realistic.

Great movie. 

[Chief]

I am planning to see it again this week, i can't wait!!!

must see IMAX again....!

btw, i think Heath's joker is pretty much untouchable!

[jazjme]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080812/film_nm/darkknight_dc;_ylt=AnP.WZoZZ4ZSprnQgc34jP1xFb8C

[tim_m]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080812/film_nm/darkknight_dc;_ylt=AnP.WZoZZ4ZSprnQgc34jP1xFb8C

I don't put much stock in what the studio "predicts" its opening weekend far exceeded what they "predicted".

[jazjme]

I agree actually, I think this could potentially break the record, by sheer fact that people want to see it broke. IF it keeps at this pace , fans will want to keep goin to if for nothing else to break titanic record. , and I think enough die hards are out there as it gets closer and closer will make the push for this record to be broken. jmo

[tim_m]

Yeah i think people knowing it has the potential to break the record will make people want to break it and really try.

[cotis]

saw it in IMAX yesterday, and boy was it greatt!

[Genesis]

I agree actually, I think this could potentially break the record, by sheer fact that people want to see it broke. IF it keeps at this pace , fans will want to keep goin to if for nothing else to break titanic record. , and I think enough die hards are out there as it gets closer and closer will make the push for this record to be broken. jmo

Yeah i think people knowing it has the potential to break the record will make people want to break it and really try.

I really doubt people will go and the see the movie more than once just to break a record. This is not like the internet and online voting. Your ticket cost is like a drop in the ocean. That being said, a lot of people are going (myself included) to watch the movie a second time, simply to see Ledger's performance once again and to understand the story in full, now that some of the more confusing plot details are known. (a.k.a the whole Ramirez thing).