Is the old GNR lineup on the new RS cover?

[ppbebe]

No one is putting the old band down to support the new one. we just can't help loving the band for how it is.
Have you seen them?
I might add that in the past it often seemed to me that old fans tend to put the new band down to support the old one.

[jarmo]

I'm relaxed dude... It's not because I wrote it with passion that I'm pissed or something. Sorry, next time I'll put the "Parental Advisory" stick before I write a post. I don't want to offend any 14 years old girl with my bad mouth. Now, I gotta get goin' to work.

Umm, sure. That's what I was talking about. 




/jarmo

[AxlCorey]

Any good exposure for GN'R's, old or new, is good in my book.  Can't wait to pick up that issue.

[Axl4Prez2004]

Ahhh!  I just picked up the new Rolling Stone at the store today.  Day off from work so I got to go to story-time with my wife and kids and then we hit the grocery store where I picked it up!  I was very gentle with it and my wife was making fun of me asking if I needed a seatbelt for it in the cart.    The check-out lady even went along and individually wrapped it as I handed it to her instead of putting it on the conveyor belt.   

It's like a Christmas present for me.     I can't imagine when CD is actually in my hands.   

[freddiebrph]

yes it is a great honor to get the cover and yes AFD is a great album worth a 20 year celebration.? That is no question.

But putting the AFD lineup on the cover and stamping it as "Guns N' Roses" is completely fucked up and undermining what Axl is trying to do with the album.? ?If they wanted to keep it in good taste, the cover should have just been a shot of Axl, or the album cover.

Yeah and you constantly undermine what those original guys did for this band.? Newsflash mate you wouldnt even know about your "Greatest Rockn Roll Band of 2007" if it werent for those guys.

not true, i just do not really care about taking trips back to 1987, I'd prefer to live in 2007 and I'm only concerned with what the current lineup is doing.? ?Fuck a reunion.

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

[ppbebe]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

where does the number come from? Have you seen a gnr show recently?

[saint seiya]

the best band in the world is fall out boy

[jarmo]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

[RageNirvanaNIN]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

[Ali]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:  If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

[ShotgunBlues1978]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!

/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

Maybe you should go read the Rolling Stone article.  There's a good quote in there from Izzy, when he was talking to Tracii Guns and explaining to him they were keeping the name Guns N' Roses even though Tracii had been replaced by Slash.  "It's just the name of the band, man"   

[DunkinDave]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

[Ali]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

Jesus Christ, did you not read the part where I said NOT YOU PERSONALLY?  I was asking a general question.  Let me be more precise since you completely missed my point:  Why would you want to come to a board that is for supporting the new Guns N' Roses if you don't consider them Guns N' Roses?

Ali

[stolat]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

If you were in a room full of concentration camp survivors do you think it would be wise to express something along the lines of: "you know that Hitler, I think he was doing a good thing"......

[DunkinDave]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

Jesus Christ, did you not read the part where I said NOT YOU PERSONALLY?

I'm not taking it personally - I'm defending RageNirvanaNIN against your comments.

[jarmo]

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

Those fans should not bother coming here then.




/jarmo

[Ali]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

Jesus Christ, did you not read the part where I said NOT YOU PERSONALLY?

I'm not taking it personally - I'm defending RageNirvanaNIN against your comments.

Again, what part of NOT YOU PERSONALLY do you not understand? ?I wasn't referring to HIM or YOU! ?I was asking a general question saying if you, the general you, don't want to support the new GN'R, then why would you post on a board that is about supporting the new GN'R?

Ali

[DunkinDave]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

If you were in a room full of concentration camp survivors do you think it would be wise to express something along the lines of: "you know that Hitler, I think he was doing a good thing"......

Holocaust analogy - wonderful.

Axl is the sole reason why the original band broke up, no one can dispute that.

He fired Slash, fired Matt, and then Duff left him.

All we're talking about is the prospect of a reunion.

[jarmo]

Wrong.

A poster with several warning should be very careful about spreading lies.


Bye.




/jarmo

[DunkinDave]

I give you an update on what the "new band" is doing. Playing concerts where 85% of music is from 1987. Maybe you should tell Axl what year it is.

Guns N' Roses playing Guns N' Roses songs that the fans enjoy hearing. What's the world coming to? The horror!





/jarmo

Just because a band keeps the name , doesn't make it true in the hearts of a lot of fans.

That's true, but it also begs a question:? If you (not you personally) feel that sentiment is true, then what are you doing posting here?

Ali

Expressing an opinion?

Just like you did by raiding the Rolling Stone blog and defending Axl for hours upon end.

Jesus Christ, did you not read the part where I said NOT YOU PERSONALLY?

I'm not taking it personally - I'm defending RageNirvanaNIN against your comments.

Again, what part of NOT YOU PERSONALLY do you not understand? ?I wasn't referring to HIM or YOU! ?I was asking a general question saying if you, the general you, don't want to support the new GN'R, then why would you post on a board that is about supporting the new GN'R?

Ali

Because this thread isn't about the new GN'R.