Why was my thread about the Rollingstone article deleted?

[novrain91]

Seems odd to me that this wouldn't be discussed. What's the point in pretending like it doesn't exist?

[D]

That article was obviously biased and written from someone who just hates Guns N Roses and has no business being a writer.

No professional would review a fuckin Demo.


I have the Original Desecration Smile from the Chili Peppers and it is horrible compared to the real version.

[estebanf]

Seems odd to me that this wouldn't be discussed. What's the point in pretending like it doesn't exist?

I dont know if this the reason, but if you look at the comments below the article, there are links to the leaked demos.

The article itself says where you can find the mp3s...

[stolat]

Seems odd to me that this wouldn't be discussed. What's the point in pretending like it doesn't exist?

I dont know if this the reason, but if you look at the comments below the article, there are links to the leaked demos.

The article itself says where you can find the mp3s...

Full marks! 

[norway]

I think GunsN'Roses don't wan't to be reviewed from unfinished material, or that the existence of leaks being promoted.
It sucks a lot, guess it's about respecting the bands wishes

Edit: Or the leaks being linked themselfs

[novrain91]

Well if Rollingstone can post the leaks, and supposedly not get into trouble (I'm assuming they talked to their attorneys before posting that). Why wouldn't we be able to atleast talk about it?  Sure the article is obviously slanted and bullshit in my opinon, but it still more relevant than many discussions on this board!

No professional would review a fuckin Demo.

That may be true, but no professional would take over a decade to....

[Timothy]

D dude the were reviewed in the download this section .

hell their is even reviews of bootlegged live show in that area.