awhellzno05
Headliner
Karma: 0
 Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 103
Oh no! Oh no! "Oh Yeah!" - Kool Aid Man
|
 |
« Reply #1960 on: February 20, 2007, 09:09:32 PM » |
|
I really wish the middle still had the punch that the first leak had, other than that I love it.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 20, 2007, 09:14:30 PM by awhellzno05 »
|
Logged
|
The Devil hates a loser
|
|
|
Bandita
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 3619
unbanned
|
|
« Reply #1961 on: February 20, 2007, 09:10:47 PM » |
|
Maybe its just me, but Robin's solo at the end sounds different as well.
The whole end sounds entirely different. I've listened to it like 15 times in a row now, every time believing more this is for real! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brock
Banned
Rocker
Karma: -2
Offline
Posts: 299
|
|
« Reply #1962 on: February 20, 2007, 09:11:29 PM » |
|
Slower, meaner...i LIKE it!!!!!
This is a good sign, that album is ready to drop on us!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
micfac
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 86
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #1963 on: February 20, 2007, 09:11:44 PM » |
|
guys this sounds far to clean to be a demo - this is the final version- were now on the home straight enjoy the ride
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BD888
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 187
I'm a llama!
|
|
« Reply #1964 on: February 20, 2007, 09:11:49 PM » |
|
I imagine there will some sort of press statement concerning this soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CheapJon
spam egg spam spam bacon and spam, spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 11087
lstn mfx 2 diz song dat shud b hurd
|
|
« Reply #1965 on: February 20, 2007, 09:13:22 PM » |
|
Maybe its just me, but Robin's solo at the end sounds different as well.
The whole end sounds entirely different. I've listened to it like 15 times in a row now, every time believing more this is for real! i'm at 25 on itunes  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
killingvector
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 3207
Bitches leave
|
|
« Reply #1966 on: February 20, 2007, 09:13:47 PM » |
|
I really need that riff accompanying the second stanza.....this version has no balls. Bucket's solo has been declawed an almost seems like background to the keyboards. The strange change in pitch on the 'na na na na' is troubling. Why exactly was this necessary?
I dunno guys, this has not met expectations.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I find that i'm far more powerful and effective when i can celebrate another's way, rather than to wish to own it.
|
|
|
|
EFISH
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1967 on: February 20, 2007, 09:13:56 PM » |
|
Maybe its just me, but Robin's solo at the end sounds different as well.
It's not just you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jackamo!
Banned
VIP
Karma: -5
Offline
Posts: 722
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #1968 on: February 20, 2007, 09:15:13 PM » |
|
Pitman and Tommy make this song better than the previous version.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BD888
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 187
I'm a llama!
|
|
« Reply #1969 on: February 20, 2007, 09:15:25 PM » |
|
I really need that riff accompanying the second stanza.....this version has no balls. Bucket's solo has been declawed an almost seems like background to the keyboards. The strange change in pitch on the 'na na na na' is troubling. Why exactly was this necessary?
I dunno guys, this has not met expectations.
Axl's gonna read that comment and decided to remix it tonight...lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Loaded NightraiN
17.5% Alcohol By Volume
Legend
Karma: -2
Offline
Posts: 3827
|
|
« Reply #1970 on: February 20, 2007, 09:15:52 PM » |
|
I really need that riff accompanying the second stanza.....this version has no balls. Bucket's solo has been declawed an almost seems like background to the keyboards. The strange change in pitch on the 'na na na na' is troubling. Why exactly was this necessary?
I dunno guys, this has not met expectations.
I agree with you there!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EFISH
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1971 on: February 20, 2007, 09:16:27 PM » |
|
I have too much to say so I won't even bother.
Anyway, if you look at the ID tags or whatever the hell you call it, it's listed as Track 1 of 11.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brock
Banned
Rocker
Karma: -2
Offline
Posts: 299
|
|
« Reply #1972 on: February 20, 2007, 09:16:47 PM » |
|
This was without a doubt the best version to date, i love it!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brock
Banned
Rocker
Karma: -2
Offline
Posts: 299
|
|
« Reply #1973 on: February 20, 2007, 09:17:36 PM » |
|
I have too much to say so I won't even bother.
Anyway, if you look at the ID tags or whatever the hell you call it, it's listed as Track 1 of 11.
Some motherfucker has the whole album!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bandita
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3619
unbanned
|
|
« Reply #1974 on: February 20, 2007, 09:17:47 PM » |
|
I have too much to say so I won't even bother.
Anyway, if you look at the ID tags or whatever the hell you call it, it's listed as Track 1 of 11.
Interesting, can't wait to hear 2-11!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Loaded NightraiN
17.5% Alcohol By Volume
Legend
Karma: -2
Offline
Posts: 3827
|
|
« Reply #1975 on: February 20, 2007, 09:17:59 PM » |
|
I have too much to say so I won't even bother.
Anyway, if you look at the ID tags or whatever the hell you call it, it's listed as Track 1 of 11.
ok so someone was smart enough to edit that in...so?? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
micfac
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 86
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #1976 on: February 20, 2007, 09:19:01 PM » |
|
i like this version top 5 on the way you heard it here first - if its track 1 of 11 does that mean the rest is leaked does anyone know what board this first appeared on tonight
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BD888
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 187
I'm a llama!
|
|
« Reply #1977 on: February 20, 2007, 09:19:36 PM » |
|
I'd have thought the album would have been atleast 12, 11 seems like a strange number.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Naupis
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 1733
I'm a llama!
|
|
« Reply #1978 on: February 20, 2007, 09:20:26 PM » |
|
I really need that riff accompanying the second stanza.....this version has no balls. Bucket's solo has been declawed an almost seems like background to the keyboards. The strange change in pitch on the 'na na na na' is troubling. Why exactly was this necessary?
By taking the balls out of the song he is trying to make it more mobile across radio formats. The demo version was too rough sounding to make it on some of the more contemporary stations that might consider the toned down softer version in this new mix. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spirit
|
|
« Reply #1979 on: February 20, 2007, 09:20:36 PM » |
|
This has certainly met my expectations!! Fucking great, that's all I have to say for now ?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
|
|
|
|
Author