I want UYI I and II re recorded

[dungbeetle]

Yah was it your idea to remake Hitchcocks Pyscho?

[ibelieveinaxl]

sure, no prob. i'll tell axl to get right on it...

[LeftToDecay]

I myself would love to see George Lucas remaking the remakes of the original Star Wars trilogy remakes.There are BETTER CGI gimmicks available now so surely they'd turn even better!

[dungbeetle]

Christ how did this become a thread, does AXL get shit done fast??? No then why and the fuck would he re record and album?? Christ I am already wondering how long it will take an album to come out after chinese democracy?? ?He lost vital younger years making this album.? I love it, its gonna be great but come the fuck on.? This could be it for AXL after CD enjoy it when it comes out

[Robman?]

Christ how did this become a thread, does AXL get shit done fast??  No then why and the fuck would he re record and album?  Christ I am already wondering how long it will take an album to come out after chinese democracy?   He lost vital younger years making this album.  I love it, its gonna be great but come the fuck on.  This could be it for AXL after CD enjoy it when it comes out

once GNR gets over that hump, it will be smooth sailing 

[phasetrak]

what the hell is wrong with you?? so you want to re-record over the REAL band???

No, he wants the NEW band to re-record over the OLD band.

[luciano]

************
You mean AXL's new band? 

Because the band that recorded Appetite for Destruction and stormed the world from 1986 to 1991 is Guns n' Roses, wheter you like it or not. There is nothing you can do to change it.

And this "new" band is just Axl's band playing GNR songs, and then again there is just nothing you can do to change it.
 

Luciano
************

[BangoSkank]

************
You mean AXL's new band??

Because the band that recorded Appetite for Destruction and stormed the world from 1986 to 1991 is Guns n' Roses, wheter you like it or not. There is nothing you can do to change it.

And this "new" band is just Axl's band playing GNR songs, and then again there is just nothing you can do to change it.
 

Luciano
************

that's just so beyond stupid i can barely comment on it.


also - i don't want them to re-record anything, because the Use Your Illusions are complete works of art, as is Appetite.  Re-recording them, erasing what past members have done changes it into something else - not the albums we love.  It's as bad as George lucas going back and digitally altering Star Wars to make it better, it's a work of art that, once completed, really shouldn't be tampered with.

plus it would take SO GODDAMN LONG, i want new material, ass-kicking, beautiful new material - which is nicely on it's way, so I'm very happy with the state of the Guns right now.

[russtcb]

************
You mean AXL's new band??

Because the band that recorded Appetite for Destruction and stormed the world from 1986 to 1991 is Guns n' Roses, wheter you like it or not. There is nothing you can do to change it.

And this "new" band is just Axl's band playing GNR songs, and then again there is just nothing you can do to change it.
 

Luciano
************

Wow. How completely original! To post something about how the current members of the band aren't really Guns N' Roses!

[BangoSkank]

************
You mean AXL's new band??

Because the band that recorded Appetite for Destruction and stormed the world from 1986 to 1991 is Guns n' Roses, wheter you like it or not. There is nothing you can do to change it.

And this "new" band is just Axl's band playing GNR songs, and then again there is just nothing you can do to change it.
 

Luciano
************

Wow. How completely original! To post something about how the current members of the band aren't really Guns N' Roses!

My thoughts exactly.

[luciano]

***********
My thoughts, there is nothing original about it.

Oh, and I was not answering/talking to any of you guys, I was answering the guy who wrote this:

No, he wants the NEW band to re-record over the OLD band.

Luciano
***********

[The Legend]

************
You mean AXL's new band??

Because the band that recorded Appetite for Destruction and stormed the world from 1986 to 1991 is Guns n' Roses, wheter you like it or not. There is nothing you can do to change it.

And this "new" band is just Axl's band playing GNR songs, and then again there is just nothing you can do to change it.
 

Luciano
************

Just as much the same you can't get over that the entity that is Guns N' Roses is moving on without the guys from the 1986-91 days.

Although Izzy is being welcomed for the ride!

[freedom78]

***********
My thoughts, there is nothing original about it.

Oh, and I was not answering/talking to any of you guys, I was answering the guy who wrote this:

No, he wants the NEW band to re-record over the OLD band.

Luciano
***********

When you post something idiotic in public, you can expect a public response.

[luciano]

Just as much the same you can't get over that the entity that is Guns N' Roses is moving on without the guys from the 1986-91 days!

*******
Oh, this is brand new to me.
Guns n' Roses is an entity now?
Wow. 
Or maybe I understood it wrong. Maybe you just were trying to say that GNR is like Menudo. New guys replace the old ones and the "entity" moves on. Is that right?
 
No, I guess not.
I guess you just think that Guns n' Roses is Axl, right?
Got ya! 
*******

When you post something idiotic in public, you can expect a public response.

*******
Thanks for the idiotic word! I was missing felling 11 years old! It was so cool back then! I wish I could be like you. I guess you are having a great time, huh?
*******

Luciano

[freedom78]

Just as much the same you can't get over that the entity that is Guns N' Roses is moving on without the guys from the 1986-91 days!

*******
Oh, this is brand new to me.
Guns n' Roses is an entity now?
Wow. 
Or maybe I understood it wrong. Maybe you just were trying to say that GNR is like Menudo. New guys replace the old ones and the "entity" moves on. Is that right?
 
No, I guess not.
I guess you just think that Guns n' Roses is Axl, right?
Got ya! 
*******

Guns N' Roses was Axl, Slash, Izzy, Duff, and Steven.
Then Axl, Slash, Izzy, Duff, and Matt.
Then Axl, Slash, Duff, Matt, and Gilby...and so on.  If you can't accept change, then don't listen to the new stuff (or the Illusion albums, for that matter).  Based on your profile text (Axl-Izzy-Slash-Duff-Steven!), I'm guessing you cannot accept change. 

Do we think GNR is just Axl? 

No.

Most of us think it was all of the iterations I listed above (and those I didn't list, as well).  Most of us think GNR IS Axl, Tommy, Ron, Robin, Richard, Dizzy, Chris, and Bryan.  This is dependent on the idea that time only moves in one direction.  If it moves in both, GNR simultaneously is the current lineup, all previous lineups, and all future lineups.     

When you post something idiotic in public, you can expect a public response.

*******
Thanks for the idiotic word! I was missing felling 11 years old! It was so cool back then! I wish I could be like you. I guess you are having a great time, huh?
*******

Luciano

I truly have no idea what you're talking about.  However, I do support your efforts to be like me.  I am having a great time, thanks.   

[The Legend]

Just as much the same you can't get over that the entity that is Guns N' Roses is moving on without the guys from the 1986-91 days!

*******
Oh, this is brand new to me.
Guns n' Roses is an entity now?
Wow.?
Or maybe I understood it wrong. Maybe you just were trying to say that GNR is like Menudo. New guys replace the old ones and the "entity" moves on. Is that right?
 
No, I guess not.
I guess you just think that Guns n' Roses is Axl, right?
Got ya!?
*******

When you post something idiotic in public, you can expect a public response.

*******
Thanks for the idiotic word! I was missing felling 11 years old! It was so cool back then! I wish I could be like you. I guess you are having a great time, huh?
*******

Luciano

Guns N' Roses WAS Axl, Slash, Duff, Izzy, Steven/Matt & Dizzy

Guns N' Roses IS Axl, Robin, Ron, Richard, Tommy, Frank, Dizzy, Chris, and sometimes Izzy (kind of like A-E-I-O-U and sometimes Y, with vowels. That's GN'R 2006 baby!)

[luciano]

**********

Do you like to change?
How about replacing your mother by the nicest woman in the world?
How about replacing your brother by the coolest guy?
Some people are just not replaceable. Specially when it comes to musicians. Izzy, Slash and Duff fill in that category.
So, as you can see, it is not about "accepting change" or not.

Guns n' Roses was the best band in the world.
Axl's band (NEW GNR) is just a good/great band (as you like), and it is good/great BECAUSE of Axl.
If Axl Rose was not singing on it, I am SURE 90% of the people here on this very board wouldn't bother to listen to it.
I am sure I wouldn't!
But I am always be listening to whatever Axl does.
Because he is so good.
But that don't make the other people around him just as good.
And that does not blind my judgment over the music that he is singing.
Because he has set the highest possible bar in Guns n' Roses.

*****************


**********

[freedom78]

Some people are just not replaceable. Specially when it comes to musicians. Izzy, Slash and Duff fill in that category.
So, as you can see, it is not about "accepting change" or not.

Apparently neither Steven nor Matt are irreplaceable...I'd be interested in knowing how you make that distinction.  Is it because Steven was replaced, but you like UYI, so it's ok that he was replaced?  Why can you accept that change, and not others? 

Also, regarding the idea that this applies especially to musicians, should AC/DC have not added Brian Johnson, after Bon's death?  I mean, Bon was a musician, right?  So he's irreplaceable.  And Back in Black should have never been recorded.  Correct?  If you truly believe so, then that's fine, but that opinion is destined for the trash bin of history.  I'm sure a reasonable number of people thought so at the time, but they have long since been silenced. 

Musicians are replaceable.  Whether the replacements are better than the original members is a matter of opinion.  The extent to which replacements are valid pieces of a band's history is decided after the fact, by the quality of the music they produce and the willingness of fans to accept them, rather than by hastily conceived ideas that this member or that is "irreplaceable."     

[Czr]

I can't believe I just spent the last 14 minutes reading this!

[cotis]

So you would rather move backwards than forwards?

Hear old songs re-recorded, rather than hear new great songs GNR are going to putout on 'Chinese Democracy'?

...some people on this board are crazzzzzzy