They needn't look like GNR
They needn't sound like GNR
They needn't act like GNR.
They are GNR. they just need to be themselves.
I agree and disagree.
If it was Axl and the whatevers or someother band name fine, but it is not it is GNR and GNR means something, it is more then one man, it is a way of life, a statement, it is a livin breathen beast. I always supported GNR but during that brief 2002 era I did not 100%, because it hurt to much. Like when someone dies a horrific death you remember them for the good times and the high points. The 2006 lineup is a close to perfect as you can get
So now that I'm way off topic let me just say. GNR is the best band in the world once again and they are here to stay.
I don't get your point.
What way of life and what statement are you seeing there? A Fashion statement? that bad boy attitude?
I don't think they have to try to meet other's idea of perfection. IMO that would make them anything but GNR.
I never see a band as a person. To me it's the spirit of the band.
The spirit also grows.
It always says not to pigeonhole things and yourself.
You are free to change. Don't be afraid of the changes and accept yourself.
That's my take.
like Axl's old friend photographer put it,
"Human nature wants what's familiar and if you stay there, you're stuck. Keep yourself open and you'll be amazed. Change is good. And yes, even Axl has changed".
The world changes. People change. all living things change. Why shouldn't a band change?
GNR in 2002 needn't be the 20th century version. Or rather, shouldn't be. Neither does the 2006 version.