of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 25, 2024, 09:56:10 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228746
Posts in
43282
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Guns N' Roses
Dead Horse
Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
All
Author
Topic: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"? (Read 16635 times)
Bono
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #20 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:04:45 PM »
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 08:57:56 PM
Axl fighting with security guards is a mellow Axl is it?
No. It just lame that's all.
Logged
PrettyTiedUp763
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 284
Here Today...
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #21 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:08:46 PM »
Quote from: miss bomb on September 29, 2006, 08:16:36 PM
Quote from: Mandy. on September 29, 2006, 08:07:29 PM
Only Tommy. Fear the flying bass......
Yes. That will go down in history for me.
Logged
fixintodie
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #22 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:11:56 PM »
Quote from: jaypayton on September 29, 2006, 07:59:25 PM
VR isnt dangerous..they are just trying to capitalize on the GNR? rep....although weiland is dangerous if u put a rig and some smack near him.......GNR USED to be dangerous around 1986-1988......after 1989 they kinda became a corporate rock band..you cant be dangerous when u have private jets and limos........
Allow me to introduce you to Michael Jackson.
Logged
kyrie
Legend
Karma: 1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1629
Eden has enough to go around
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #23 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:12:32 PM »
Quote from: Bono on September 29, 2006, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 08:57:56 PM
Axl fighting with security guards is a mellow Axl is it?
No. It just lame that's all.
Lame is what the rest of the music scene is. Fred Durst leaving angry messages on answering machines. (F)eminem fighting with hand puppets. Lars spending more time talking about his painting collection than music (at least the little troll got pissed on). A bunch of so-called rock stars hiring a singer on live TV. A million cookie-cutter clones following the script for "success" by doing exactly what they're told. Tom Morello (who I do respect) pre-arranging his arrest this week to ensure he wouldn't be detained too long.
A drunken scuffle in a hotel room I can live with.
Logged
madagas
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #24 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:16:33 PM »
This is a dangerous band.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e-s86wXOY4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2-RJuIRAaw&mode=related&search=
watch that second one first! The anthem of the 80's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1gdRQ_N3PU&NR?
? ?
It's too late to take pills here we go!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBVLrc62X-U&mode=related&search=?
? ?
the best of the bunch-Tommy at 15
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hksTHvTk3Pg&mode=related&search=
«
Last Edit: September 29, 2006, 09:39:06 PM by madagas
»
Logged
Axl_GNR
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 111
Here Today...
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #25 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:28:17 PM »
Axl has always been volatile and reactionary. He does and says what he wants, when he wants, despite the possible repercussions, which can lead others to believe Axl and Guns N' Roses as "dangerous".
Logged
www.myspace.com/gnfnr
Bono
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #26 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:31:29 PM »
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 09:12:32 PM
Quote from: Bono on September 29, 2006, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 08:57:56 PM
Axl fighting with security guards is a mellow Axl is it?
No. It just lame that's all.
Lame is what the rest of the music scene is. Fred Durst leaving angry messages on answering machines. (F)eminem fighting with hand puppets. Lars spending more time talking about his painting collection than music (at least the little troll got pissed on). A bunch of so-called rock stars hiring a singer on live TV. A million cookie-cutter clones following the script for "success" by doing exactly what they're told. Tom Morello (who I do respect) pre-arranging his arrest this week to ensure he wouldn't be detained too long.
A drunken scuffle in a hotel room I can live with.
Whatever. Axl biting a guy on the leg isn't gonna change the mainstrem music scene and as bad as anyone thinks the mainstreme music scene is, Axl biting a guy is lame. there's no way around it. It's lame.
Logged
Scree
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 654
Waiting
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #27 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:35:58 PM »
Thats just a tag line... Kerrang (UK) called them the most dangerous band in the world in 86 or 87 and they've pretty much used it ever since.
Logged
Life is a strange thing. Just when you think you've learnt how to use it it's gone.
phi_kai_phi
Banned
Headliner
Karma: -3
Offline
Posts: 139
Here Today...
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #28 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:36:32 PM »
Dangerous??? the biggest incidents the band itself has had was attacking the security gaurd, and Tommy Hillfinger punching him in the arm.
No, i wouldn't mind seeing any of them in a dark alley. Even drunk or on drugs. Axl has been living the high life and gone soft.
Logged
kyrie
Legend
Karma: 1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1629
Eden has enough to go around
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #29 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:37:19 PM »
Quote from: Bono on September 29, 2006, 09:31:29 PM
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 09:12:32 PM
Quote from: Bono on September 29, 2006, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 08:57:56 PM
Axl fighting with security guards is a mellow Axl is it?
No. It just lame that's all.
Lame is what the rest of the music scene is. Fred Durst leaving angry messages on answering machines. (F)eminem fighting with hand puppets. Lars spending more time talking about his painting collection than music (at least the little troll got pissed on). A bunch of so-called rock stars hiring a singer on live TV. A million cookie-cutter clones following the script for "success" by doing exactly what they're told. Tom Morello (who I do respect) pre-arranging his arrest this week to ensure he wouldn't be detained too long.
A drunken scuffle in a hotel room I can live with.
Whatever. Axl biting a guy on the leg isn't gonna change the mainstrem music scene and as bad as anyone thinks the mainstreme music scene is, Axl biting a guy is lame. there's no way around it. It's lame.
Not my point. It's far less lame than the rest of the industry, and unlike those I mentioned (with the exception of Morello), Axl has talent as a songwriter.
Logged
Satapher
Wings Of Redemption
VIP
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 580
GODS N' ROSES
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #30 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:38:39 PM »
Beware the next BITE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
1992.11.29 Bogota, COL
2001.12.31 Las Vegas, USA
2002.12.05 New York City, USA
2010.03.30 Bogota, COL
2016.07.27 Atlanta, USA
2016.11.23 Medellin, COL
2022.06.15 Stavanger, NOR
2023.06.21 Oslo,
Bono
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #31 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:54:21 PM »
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 09:37:19 PM
Not my point. It's far less lame than the rest of the industry, and unlike those I mentioned (with the exception of Morello), Axl has talent as a songwriter.
I agree with you about the mainstreme music scene for the most part but in my opinion there's not too many things in life more lame than biteing someone. personally of all the things Axl has ever done that one kinda made me roll my eyes and think "My God" more than any of them.? Anyways "The Bite" is old news, I'm getting off topic.?
«
Last Edit: September 29, 2006, 09:56:03 PM by Bono
»
Logged
Scree
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 654
Waiting
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #32 on:
September 29, 2006, 09:58:08 PM »
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 09:37:19 PM
Quote from: Bono on September 29, 2006, 09:31:29 PM
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 09:12:32 PM
Quote from: Bono on September 29, 2006, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: kyrie on September 29, 2006, 08:57:56 PM
Axl fighting with security guards is a mellow Axl is it?
No. It just lame that's all.
Lame is what the rest of the music scene is. Fred Durst leaving angry messages on answering machines. (F)eminem fighting with hand puppets. Lars spending more time talking about his painting collection than music (at least the little troll got pissed on). A bunch of so-called rock stars hiring a singer on live TV. A million cookie-cutter clones following the script for "success" by doing exactly what they're told. Tom Morello (who I do respect) pre-arranging his arrest this week to ensure he wouldn't be detained too long.
A drunken scuffle in a hotel room I can live with.
Whatever. Axl biting a guy on the leg isn't gonna change the mainstrem music scene and as bad as anyone thinks the mainstreme music scene is, Axl biting a guy is lame. there's no way around it. It's lame.
Not my point. It's far less lame than the rest of the industry, and unlike those I mentioned (with the exception of Morello), Axl has talent as a songwriter.
Lame or not, the bite was fucking funny to hear about.
"Hey Axl got into a fight with a security guard"
"Did Axl fuck him up?"
"Naw, he bit him on the leg though"
"That'll learn him"
Amusing stuff.
Logged
Life is a strange thing. Just when you think you've learnt how to use it it's gone.
HamsterDemocracy
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #33 on:
September 29, 2006, 10:01:02 PM »
Quote from: jarmo on September 29, 2006, 07:43:26 PM
Dangerous? No, I wouldn't use that word.
Unpredictable and not doing stuff the way everybody else does them? Definitely.
I think that makes them more unpredictable than VR. That's why I thought it was amusing how they tried to use that angle when marketing the band.
/jarmo
I'm surprised you would mention VR.
Logged
25
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #34 on:
September 29, 2006, 11:59:46 PM »
GNR - Most Dangerous Band In The World . . . .
. . . . if you're a UMG stockholder.
Logged
jaypayton
Banned
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 262
Here Today...
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #35 on:
September 30, 2006, 12:10:24 AM »
i think Pantera was a far more dangerous band...
Logged
25
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #36 on:
September 30, 2006, 12:22:50 AM »
Quote from: jaypayton on September 30, 2006, 12:10:24 AM
i think Pantera was a far more dangerous band...
Maybe they would have been, if they'd ever acheived a remotely similar level of success across the globe. Or been able to complete a sentence between them.
Logged
BLS-Pride
Jack Daniel's drinkin'
Banned
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1849
Roses of Velvet Mother Fuckers.
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #37 on:
September 30, 2006, 12:30:46 AM »
Quote from: 25 on September 30, 2006, 12:22:50 AM
Quote from: jaypayton on September 30, 2006, 12:10:24 AM
i think Pantera was a far more dangerous band...
Maybe they would have been, if they'd ever acheived a remotely similar level of success across the globe. Or been able to complete a sentence between them.
Uhhh.. Pantera carried the heavy metal tourch through the 90's.. Metal woukd not have survuved wuth out them. Pantera is showed the same if not more respect in their field of music, metal.. as gnR is if not more.
Logged
www.rosesofvelvet.com
[BLS-Pride] 10:16 pm: ron - lemmy is god.. agreed?
[Bumblefoot] 10:16 pm: Lemmy created God.
25
Guest
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #38 on:
September 30, 2006, 12:43:54 AM »
Quote from: BLS-Pride on September 30, 2006, 12:30:46 AM
Uhhh.. Pantera carried the heavy metal tourch through the 90's.. Metal woukd not have survuved wuth out them. Pantera is showed the same if not more respect in their field of music, metal.. as gnR is if not more.
Maybe true in the U.S. but I know that in Europe/UK Pantera never really took off. At least not enough that I'd notice. I don't have any idea if they were big anywhere else, and I wouldn't want to throw the question to the rest of the board and derail the thread. But, in parting, I have to say that metal would have probably made it through the 90's just fine without Pantera. I'm not saying they're a terrible band or anything, I just think that their fanbase is a lot more marginal than a GNR, or a Metallica for that matter.
Logged
asstvp1009
Banned
Headliner
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 91
Here Today...
Re: Is GnR "DANGEROUS"?
«
Reply #39 on:
September 30, 2006, 12:47:19 AM »
no. not dangerous. child-like yes.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
All
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...