Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 23, 2024, 03:41:02 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228739 Posts in 43282 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Guns N' Roses
| | |-+  CITR was leaked into the wrong pitch/speed
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: CITR was leaked into the wrong pitch/speed  (Read 10771 times)
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3371


Richard Fortus, the phenomenon


« on: August 10, 2006, 10:07:39 AM »

I'm 99,9999% sure that the real version of "Catcher in the Rye" is:
1) a little bit faster
2) played higher

The leaked version was not representative of what we will hear on the record. I've heard a re-done version with a faster tempo and a higher pitch and it sounds absolutely better. More natural. This is a fucking great track.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 10:12:07 AM by nesquick » Logged

Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
Neemo
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 6118



« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2006, 10:10:26 AM »

i think the slow plodding pace of the orig leak suits the song more...gives it a feeling of depression...so i think that the orig speed we heard is correct...

but who knows really untill we hear the final version
Logged

COMAMOTIVE
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1799

At least there's a reaction


« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2006, 10:18:39 AM »

I find the one we have heard to be boring and missing something. Hopefully this change you're speaking of will add a little something
Logged
agropolus
Rocker
***

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 378


Here Today...


« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2006, 10:21:45 AM »

where did you hear this re-done version?
Logged
Neemo
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 6118



« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2006, 10:26:44 AM »

IMO the change is minimal....like 6 seconds over the whole song...i think it was just a fan version of the track...condensing it to the point where Axl is on the brink of sounding like Mickey Mouse...the faster one is like only 98% faster than the orig one
Logged

Miggy
Banned
Headliner
**

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 107



« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2006, 10:34:15 AM »

98?  Shocked   You must mean 2!   Wink
Logged
Neemo
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 6118



« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2006, 10:35:50 AM »

98?? Shocked? ?You must mean 2!? ?Wink

doh!! yeah lol what he said
Logged

Steel_Angel
Guest
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2006, 10:38:19 AM »

go to youtube, type in just "frozeninferno" and look 4 "imsorrys" version of citr. it sounds pretty sweet. he changed teh tempo too.
Logged
Evolution
Guest
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2006, 10:40:35 AM »

It sounds good. A little brighter than the original leak.
Logged
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3371


Richard Fortus, the phenomenon


« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2006, 10:43:32 AM »

The version i heard was not the one of frozen inferno. Basically, a very few people heard it. It's higher and faster. Like Jungle demo 86 and Jungle on Appetite... do you see what I mean? There's a kind of "breakdown" (the song) feel to it. Not as fast though, but there is something like "breakdown" of UYI 2 in the pitch/speed. Mid-tempo. Not the slow tempo that was leaked. It just sounds more natural.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 10:50:53 AM by nesquick » Logged

Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
Steel_Angel
Guest
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2006, 10:45:48 AM »

weird. never heard that one. must sound crazy. does he sound like a chipmunk?
Logged
duga
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1099


If you're not a rock star - at least act like one


« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2006, 10:51:02 AM »

The version i heard was not the one of frozen inferno. Basically, a very few people heard it. It's higher and faster. Like Jungle demo 86 and Jungle on Appetite... do you see what I mean? There's a kind of "breakdown" feel to it. Not as fast though, but there is something like "breakdown" of UYI 2. Mid-tempo. Not the slow tempo that was leaked.

Jungle demo 86 sounds awful.  no
Logged

Stockholm 2006, Oslo 2010, Maryland 2016, Stockholm 2017, Gothenburg 2018


Power to the people, peace out and blame Canada
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3371


Richard Fortus, the phenomenon


« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2006, 10:52:27 AM »

weird. never heard that one. must sound crazy. does he sound like a chipmunk?

No, Axl sounds great.
Logged

Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
codenameninja
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 820


Here Today...


« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2006, 10:53:47 AM »

I'm 99,9999% sure that the real version of "Catcher in the Rye" is:
1) a little bit faster
2) played higher

The leaked version was not representative of what we will hear on the record. I've heard a re-done version with a faster tempo and a higher pitch and it sounds absolutely better. More natural. This is a fucking great track.

So your not 100% sure and you think the song will bit played a little faster. Well thanks for your insight  hihi
Logged
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3371


Richard Fortus, the phenomenon


« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2006, 10:56:29 AM »

So frozen inferno, what do you think now?? Smiley
Logged

Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
Steel_Angel
Guest
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2006, 11:00:16 AM »

its really good lol. soo you're pretty much right.
 Tongue
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 11:11:51 AM by frozen inferno » Logged
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3286



« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2006, 11:02:55 AM »

i listened to his one as well a while ago.... i`m pretty sure it was fan made...   


well of course it`s fanmade hihi
Logged

Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
makane
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1518



« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2006, 11:11:19 AM »

More natural? Did you even listen to the instrumental parts?
 I think this sounds very off-balanced. (the faster one)
Logged

YagetoutonyourownAndyoutakeallthatyouownAndyouforgetaboutyourhomeAndthenyou'rejustfuckin'gone!
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3371


Richard Fortus, the phenomenon


« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2006, 11:14:34 AM »

The "faster one" is the one I have wich you haven't listened to yet? Wink
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 11:19:35 AM by nesquick » Logged

Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
agropolus
Rocker
***

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 378


Here Today...


« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2006, 11:29:39 AM »

where can I find this faster one?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 19 queries.