of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 25, 2024, 05:04:05 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228762
Posts in
43283
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Guns N' Roses
Dead Horse
New Band
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: New Band (Read 2396 times)
GNVR
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 71
Here Today...
New Band
«
on:
June 19, 2006, 07:44:57 AM »
Don't worry, this is not a new band vs. old band thread.
What I'd like to know is, who here thinks that the new band really represents Guns N' Roses?? What I mean by that is: Do all the new members have the style, stage present, attitude and look needed to be in GNR?? Axl Rose decided to rebuild this band and get a fresh start.? In 2002, they were referred to as a circus emsemble (or whatever the term) and people mocked them non stop (especially BH).? Today, they all pretty much have the same rockstar look as Axl does, and to me, feel and look more and more like a real band rather than a cast of hired guns like in 2002.? My question is:? Which new members truly fits the embodiment of the new GNR?? In? MY opinion, Tommy Stintson, Richard Fortus, Dizzy Reed and Ron Thal all have IT.? Robin Finck (even with the new look), Brain and Chris Pittman do not look the part.? Any thoughts?
«
Last Edit: June 19, 2006, 07:48:21 AM by GNVR
»
Logged
Tomorrows
VIP
Karma: -6
Offline
Posts: 1384
Stick to your guns
Re: New Band
«
Reply #1 on:
June 19, 2006, 07:47:34 AM »
Bullshit, this is the very essence of a new band v. old band thread.
Logged
anythinggoes
Guest
Re: New Band
«
Reply #2 on:
June 19, 2006, 07:48:05 AM »
and what are you comparing the look of nugnr too exactly the way they look is what nugnr looks like any comparrison turns this into a OLD vs New thread
Logged
GNVR
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 71
Here Today...
Re: New Band
«
Reply #3 on:
June 19, 2006, 08:02:42 AM »
Compare GNR in 2001-2002 to today.? Back then, it was Axl Rose and the replacement.? In my opinion, it was hard to support them cause it didn't feel real.? Players like BH, Paul Toabias and others didn't fit.? It was a hired cast except Tommy. I've always felt like he was perfect in GNR. Today, I look at what Axl's done and I think that he's succeeded in rebuilding this band.? These guys really gel and are exciting to watch.? Again, I'm not talking about the old band here...
«
Last Edit: June 19, 2006, 08:05:29 AM by GNVR
»
Logged
slashisvr
D.T.U.D.
VIP
Karma: -4
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1231
A Rock N' Roll bash where everybody's smashed
Re: New Band
«
Reply #4 on:
June 19, 2006, 12:16:16 PM »
now is the first time GnR look like a band sine 92, even at some shows there they didnt look like a band
Logged
Hammersmith - london 7th june G N' F' R
NEC - Birmingham 25th july G N' F' R
monkeychow
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 580
How's that for provocation?
Re: New Band
«
Reply #5 on:
June 20, 2006, 04:54:17 AM »
Quote from: GNVR on June 19, 2006, 07:44:57 AM
Don't worry, this is not a new band vs. old band thread.
What I'd like to know is, who here thinks that the new band really represents Guns N' Roses? What I mean by that is: Do all the new members have the style, stage present, attitude and look needed to be in GNR? Axl Rose decided to rebuild this band and get a fresh start. In 2002, they were referred to as a circus emsemble (or whatever the term) and people mocked them non stop (especially BH). Today, they all pretty much have the same rockstar look as Axl does, and to me, feel and look more and more like a real band rather than a cast of hired guns like in 2002. My question is: Which new members truly fits the embodiment of the new GNR? In MY opinion, Tommy Stintson, Richard Fortus, Dizzy Reed and Ron Thal all have IT. Robin Finck (even with the new look), Brain and Chris Pittman do not look the part. Any thoughts?
I disagree...I think Fink looks spot on now.
His 02 goth look just didn't suit the rest of the band. I mean it should be about the music not looks anyway...but if we're going on looks then 2006 is major improvement on 2002.
I think the new band looks ok as a band together now. Although i've never seen the need for 3 guitars really, it doesn't seem like theres that many places where a 3rd guitar part adds a lot to the songs.
Logged
oldgunsfan
Legend
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 2264
Here Today...
Re: New Band
«
Reply #6 on:
June 21, 2006, 09:13:07 PM »
Quote from: anythinggoes on June 19, 2006, 07:48:05 AM
and what are you comparing the look of nugnr too exactly the way they look is what nugnr looks like any comparrison turns this into a OLD vs New thread
v2002 vs v2006 (sounds like a Version of Windows Software
)
v2006 looks much more like a rock band, v2002 lookd like a circus freakshow
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...