Propaganda

[GNRLived]

Hi,

Just wondering why the Weiland Statement was originally added to the HTGTH news section and then removed.
Why is Axl's statement still part of the news section and Scotts removed.

My view on Weiland is:
-- False rockstar attitude that made a show of VR at Live 8. They have become the joke of the event and Scott Weiland played a major part.
-- Dresses like an 80's AXL.
-- Pretends to be an intellect and rants about rockin roll rebellions in his live gigs. I was at the Dublin VR gig and Weiland was a pratt. His rants are like a 10 year old trying to be cool.

My view on removing Weilands comments from HTGTH news section:
-- Biased.
-- Propaganda.
-- Lick arse site. Heads can be found up Axls/Sanctuary?s ass.

I mean why when there is news sections added for every little Axl and GNR mention and then when suddenly one that "Will tick Axl off" arrives it gets removed.

I dont understand.......

[jarmo]

My view on removing Weilands comments from HTGTH news section:
-- Biased.
-- Propaganda.
-- Lick arse site. Heads can be found up Axls/Sanctuary?s ass.

Ok. Thanks for your opinion.

I value it as much as Weiland's. 




/jarmo

[Gaymo, the Hobbit]

Because Scott doesn't need more attention. This is a GNR page, and Scott can stick his stupid statement up his bum bum

[T_Roxie]

My view on removing Weilands comments from HTGTH news section:
-- Biased.
-- Propaganda.
-- Lick arse site. Heads can be found up Axls/Sanctuary?s ass.

Ok. Thanks for your opinion.

I value it as much as Weiland's.?




/jarmo

Owned!

[younggunner]

Will tick Axl off"

actually i think it iwll make Axl laugh

[NickNasty]

My view on removing Weilands comments from HTGTH news section:
-- Biased.
-- Propaganda.
-- Lick arse site. Heads can be found up Axls/Sanctuary?s ass.

Ok. Thanks for your opinion.

I value it as much as Weiland's. 




/jarmo

Smackdown!

[Siliconmessiah]

Ok. Thanks for your opinion.

I value it as much as Weiland's. 

   




And by the way, great first post "gnrlived". Welcome to this place. This is a Guns N Roses forum.        

[GNRLived]

Dont get me wrong Jarmo. I read this site all the time and think its great. Super infact. Been reading for years. Great job.

I dont rate Weilands statement either, however, I find it stupid to ignore it. I mean some banged up cockstar that even mentions Axl you post on the news section. Then Weiland responds you ignore.

Come on folks. We cant complain about Magazines and Journalists for being biased and then be biased ourselves. Democracy. Most magazines have already written their biased CD review before even hearing the album and that pisses me off. But that does not mean that we need to be biased aswell. I mean if I stick my head up Axls arse I expect shit to be on my head. Right??

Just because the site is hosted by sanctuary doesnt mean we have to act like sanctuary!!!

[saint seiya]

only way axl can defend himself now is by releasing the album

[rv62900]

Hi,

Just wondering why the Weiland Statement was originally added to the HTGTH news section and then removed.
Why is Axl's statement still part of the news section and Scotts removed.

My view on Weiland is:
-- False rockstar attitude that made a show of VR at Live 8. They have become the joke of the event and Scott Weiland played a major part.
-- Dresses like an 80's AXL.
-- Pretends to be an intellect and rants about rockin roll rebellions in his live gigs. I was at the Dublin VR gig and Weiland was a pratt. His rants are like a 10 year old trying to be cool.

My view on removing Weilands comments from HTGTH news section:
-- Biased.
-- Propaganda.
-- Lick arse site. Heads can be found up Axls/Sanctuary?s ass.

I mean why when there is news sections added for every little Axl and GNR mention and then when suddenly one that "Will tick Axl off" arrives it gets removed.

I dont understand.......

besides the last part, i actually think ur first post is quit good, u seem like u r pro Axl

Rock on

[jmrgnr]

Its a fair question that Jarmo has not answered. Give an answer instead of a sarcastic reponse would have been a better approach.

[makane]

Its a fair question that Jarmo has not answered. Give an answer instead of a sarcastic reponse would have been a better approach.

Add 1 to 1, what do ya get?

[jarmo]

Just wondering why the Weiland Statement was originally added to the HTGTH news section and then removed.

First I wanted people to see how low somebody can go, then I realized, why give this guy the exposure he seems to crave?

He's got nothing to do with the court case between Axl and Duff and Slash.

Why is Axl's statement still part of the news section and Scotts removed.

Axl released a legal press release as a response to the lawsuit that's going on, Weiland released something else...

Its a fair question that Jarmo has not answered. Give an answer instead of a sarcastic reponse would have been a better approach.

Happy now?



/jarmo

[GNRLived]

Sorry about the sarcasm. Its an Irish thing. I dont mean anything harsh by it.

[jimb0]

Just wondering why the Weiland Statement was originally added to the HTGTH news section and then removed.

First I wanted people to see how low somebody can go, then I realized, why give this guy the exposure he seems to crave?

He's got nothing to do with the court case between Axl and Duff and Slash.

Why is Axl's statement still part of the news section and Scotts removed.

Axl released a legal press release as a response to the lawsuit that's going on, Weiland released something else...

Its a fair question that Jarmo has not answered. Give an answer instead of a sarcastic reponse would have been a better approach.

Happy now?



/jarmo

Completely agree, plus we have this forum for crap like that to be read.  I was surprised when I seen it on the front page and I'm glad Jarmo removed it.

[pasnow]

Just wondering why the Weiland Statement was originally added to the HTGTH news section and then removed.

First I wanted people to see how low somebody can go, then I realized, why give this guy the exposure he seems to crave?

He's got nothing to do with the court case between Axl and Duff and Slash.

Why is Axl's statement still part of the news section and Scotts removed.

Axl released a legal press release as a response to the lawsuit that's going on, Weiland released something else...

Its a fair question that Jarmo has not answered. Give an answer instead of a sarcastic reponse would have been a better approach.

Happy now?



/jarmo

Thanks for clearing this up. ? Some people in the other forum for Scotts reaction were beginning to assume maybe it turned out to be false.

[GNRLived]

Thanks for the reply at least I can see your reasons. ?

Ahh feck it. I dont care. Maybe we could have simply changed the title of the news section from 'Weiland responds' to 'Weiland mentions Axl to seek attention'.

I just think that if we add comments about Axl (even negative) from other rock stars we should do the same for Weiland even if he is a pratt that annoys me. Just wouldnt want this site to become known as a pack of Axl worshipers who destory anything negative. Sounds too like the American government.

[WAR41]

Just wondering why the Weiland Statement was originally added to the HTGTH news section and then removed.

First I wanted people to see how low somebody can go, then I realized, why give this guy the exposure he seems to crave?

He's got nothing to do with the court case between Axl and Duff and Slash.

Why is Axl's statement still part of the news section and Scotts removed.

Axl released a legal press release as a response to the lawsuit that's going on, Weiland released something else...

Its a fair question that Jarmo has not answered. Give an answer instead of a sarcastic reponse would have been a better approach.

Happy now?



/jarmo

Well Jarmo, my only response to what you said is that you post MENTIONS of Axl/GNR/ex members from newspapers or online articles in the news section.  This is certainly a MENTION of Axl and other ex GNR members isnt it?

[jarmo]

It's a mention all right.

But is it worth mentioning? 


/jarmo

[Mutherfunker]

Does anybody not think that to Guns N' Roses (You remember the band don't you - the one this site is about), Weiland's comments are totally irrelevant, and about as useful as a comment by any other random person that has nothing to do with Guns N' Roses.

If it's irrelevant to Guns N' Roses, why should it be news on a Guns N' Roses site?

@#$%Funker