of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 22, 2024, 11:21:01 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228736
Posts in
43282
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Off Topic
Bad Obsession
Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
Author
Topic: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things. (Read 34825 times)
SOLGER
Rocker
Karma: -2
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 293
LIVE N? LET DIE
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #100 on:
March 15, 2006, 01:48:11 PM »
Quote from: Skeletor on March 15, 2006, 04:14:35 AM
Quote from: SOLGER on March 15, 2006, 01:43:37 AM
Quote from: Skeletor on March 12, 2006, 04:41:42 PM
Quote from: SOLGER on March 12, 2006, 04:03:43 PM
u2 has no talent..? case closed.? ?
I'm no U2 fan either, but your posts are just fucking worthless.
you know whats worthless...even more worthless than u2..? your mothers blowjobs...
Way to prove my point...
oh you`ve had them too..? thats nasty....
Logged
Live N' Let Die
supaplex
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 770
just another lazy prick
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #101 on:
March 16, 2006, 08:37:42 AM »
hey bono, seems that your thread went down really bad. you're the only one defending u2 and the others bash them saying they make crap music. so much for an intelligent discussion
Logged
www.gnrevolution.com
-Jack-
Kickin' it old school
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2044
DT imba
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #102 on:
March 16, 2006, 08:15:46 PM »
Quote from: supaplex on March 16, 2006, 08:37:42 AM
hey bono, seems that your thread went down really bad. you're the only one defending u2 and the others bash them saying they make crap music. so much for an intelligent discussion
No ones bashing. You just generalize because you like U2 and you aren't "winning."
Who is more remembered in the grand scheme of things isn't important at all. It's cool sure, but who cares? Doesn't mean one band is better than the other.
Im not bashing the idea of the thread, cause I get it... but at the same time.. why? Its like.. U2 vs. The Beatles.. whos gonna be remembered more?! I just don't see the point.
Logged
gnrevolution.com
supaplex
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 770
just another lazy prick
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #103 on:
March 17, 2006, 01:58:25 AM »
i never said i like u2. and it's not about winning.
i just think that it could've been a nice discussion. but if u look one post above mine u'll see what i mean. u2 sucks and u2 have no talent, u2 are worthless. so much for intelligent arguments.
oh and i think the fact that they're still together after so many years and people still come to their shows means they make crap music.
don't get me wrong. i like gnr a lot more than u2 and if you go to the first or second page u'll see that.
Logged
www.gnrevolution.com
Backslash
\
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1296
Use Your Allusion
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #104 on:
March 17, 2006, 07:48:21 AM »
I've been a GNR fan since I was 6 years old, and I've been a U2 fan since I was 17. haha... I never used to like U2. When you look at it in the grand scheme of things, Bono is such a humanist. What a great guy! He does all these things for starving kids in Africa. Meanwhile, Axl hasn't done a hell of a lot of good for the world, drawing no attention to social and world issues, especially over the past 10 years. The similarity is, I guess that we all know where Axl and Bono are, whenever they go anywhere. Also, U2 is tight; The Edge and Bono will never split. GNR on the other hand? psssh... U2 has had hit after hit after hit since they've been around. GNR? A few in the late 80s early 90s. I'll probably always like GNR's music more, but I think that U2 may be the better band, especially on a global level. Of course, things may change when GNR releases more material and Axl starts touring again.
Logged
GNRevolution... the missing
link
.
Eduardo
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 928
Its just that demon life has got him in its sway
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #105 on:
March 18, 2006, 12:06:38 AM »
Quote from: Garry on March 17, 2006, 10:23:16 PM
Besides, those starving kids are still gonna die...
OMG I cant believe I?m reading this! So, if they?re going to die anyway, there?s no point in helping them right?
Logged
Layne Staley's Sunglasses
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8171
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #106 on:
March 18, 2006, 12:12:30 AM »
It's nice and everything, but come on, let's be realistic (notice i put the cry smiley next to that)
Logged
-Jack-
Kickin' it old school
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2044
DT imba
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #107 on:
March 18, 2006, 01:22:33 AM »
Quote from: Eduardo on March 18, 2006, 12:06:38 AM
Quote from: Garry on March 17, 2006, 10:23:16 PM
Besides, those starving kids are still gonna die...
OMG I cant believe I?m reading this! So, if they?re going to die anyway, there?s no point in helping them right?
Peter Griffin: "Man this is almost as bad as the time I got stranded on that island with Bono!"
"Eye, Peter its for the starvin' kids"
Logged
gnrevolution.com
Backslash
\
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1296
Use Your Allusion
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #108 on:
March 18, 2006, 01:53:57 AM »
Quote from: Garry on March 17, 2006, 10:23:16 PM
Maybe Axl DOES do good things, but isn't a publicity whore like Bono.? Besides, those starving kids are still gonna die...
Wow dude... they are, but they wouldn't if everyone was like Bono!
Logged
GNRevolution... the missing
link
.
The Dog
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2131
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #109 on:
March 18, 2006, 02:49:30 AM »
I feel U2 peaked with Joshua Tree/Achtung baby - yes they are still popular, still sell out shows, but musically they aren't doing anything amazing - its kinda paint by numbers at this point.
Guns will ALWAYS be big b/c they had that element of danger, a bad boy front man, a dirt bag looking but extremely talented guitarist and were the last big band to personify sex drugs and rock n' roll.
I think they'll both be rememberd equally, but just in different conversations. You can't compare the two...one is thinking man/emotional rock the other one is the most dangerous band in the world.
I don't really think of U2 as a kick ass rock band - but they do create some beautiful songs. I think if todays rock was actually good, U2 wouldn't be nearly as popular, the sad thing is there is just nothing else to listen too besides the big bands from the 80s/early 90s who are still recording/touring.
Logged
"You're the worst character ever Towelie."
Bono
Guest
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #110 on:
March 18, 2006, 07:06:21 PM »
Quote from: Garry on March 17, 2006, 10:23:16 PM
Maybe Axl DOES do good things, but isn't a publicity whore like Bono.? Besides, those starving kids are still gonna die...
Bono aknowledges the fact that he's a publicity whore. He makes no bones about it because he knows he has a platform to draw attention to this. It's funny how so many people seem to think that helping behind closed doors is better than helping in the public eye. Sure maybe Axl does help out but what impact has he had? on you or me in terms of influenceing or inspireing us to help out? Absoluetly ZERO. Bono on the other hand has in fact inspired millions of people to join his cause and help fight the injustice of thousands of African kids dying every day because of dirty water or mosquito bites or AIDS or what have you. You do realies that the death toll equivalent to 9/11 is happening every day in Africa.
And saying that those kids are gonna die anyways is such a terrible attitude. Yes they're gonna die if we don't help them but if we do they won't. Or at least future children won't.? Here's a quote from Bono:
"I know I can't save the world, but
we
can alright."
?
Something to think about.
«
Last Edit: March 18, 2006, 07:09:19 PM by Bono
»
Logged
Backslash
\
VIP
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1296
Use Your Allusion
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #111 on:
March 19, 2006, 01:47:18 AM »
Quote from: Garry on March 18, 2006, 09:21:32 PM
Hell, we can give them all the food and water we want, but as long as it doesn't rain there and they don't have their own reliable food source to count on, THEY"RE GONNA DIE.? Not everything comes up roses in this world, I know it you know it.? We can't sugarcoat everything.? So and so is helping, big deal.? Heck yeah its nice, I do my part too, but unless Africans get some good luck on their side, they're going to keep dying.?
Of course, being helped by everyone else in the world, isn't good luck....
It's funny though, I eat a lot of foods that aren't grown locally... does that mean that me, and everyone else around me are going to die because we don't produce our own food... no, it's because of global cooperation that I get my oranges, bananas, chickens, and Vanilla Coke. I don't have to survive solely on fish and potatoes....
Logged
GNRevolution... the missing
link
.
Megaguns
Guest
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #112 on:
March 19, 2006, 02:00:14 AM »
I think U2 have got their own thing going on.... Completely different to GnR, Anyone who has seen them live here will agree that they can really connect with a crowd better than most other bands. That concert was almost life changing... When i left, something just made me want to be a better person, I dont know.... its so hard to explain... Thats U2 i guess.
Logged
Layne Staley's Sunglasses
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8171
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #113 on:
March 19, 2006, 02:10:11 AM »
Backslash, you PURCHASE those foods. And Megaguns, good for you that U2 made you want to be a better person.
Logged
Danny Top Hat
Guest
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #114 on:
March 19, 2006, 11:17:50 AM »
Garry, Africans will keep dying young as long as they are living in poverty, but with charity work INDIVIDUALS survive. You're talking about the people there as if they don't matter.
Logged
Layne Staley's Sunglasses
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8171
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #115 on:
March 19, 2006, 12:39:37 PM »
Of course they matter Danny. I'm just saying that unless it rains there, the MASSES will keep on dying. They've had droughts for years now. Sure, it's nice that maybe a few people survive in a village, but what about all their unlucky friends and family members whose bodies are lying there with flies and maggots buzzing around? Besides, the point was that Axl perhaps helps out anonymously, we can't just assume that cuz he starts riots he's not generous. What about the regular folks who chip in, I'm sure they don't gloat and glee about it.
Logged
SOLGER
Rocker
Karma: -2
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 293
LIVE N? LET DIE
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #116 on:
March 19, 2006, 01:16:55 PM »
Yeah and I guess spendig 40 grand a week in a spa in France is a great way to help....he?s a fuckin oportunist and a F A K E
Logged
Live N' Let Die
Layne Staley's Sunglasses
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8171
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #117 on:
March 19, 2006, 02:18:53 PM »
Axl or Bono?
Logged
SOLGER
Rocker
Karma: -2
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 293
LIVE N? LET DIE
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #118 on:
March 19, 2006, 04:10:24 PM »
tree feeding bono..
Axl rules
Logged
Live N' Let Die
Layne Staley's Sunglasses
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8171
Re: Guns N' Roses vs U2 in the grand scheme of things.
«
Reply #119 on:
March 19, 2006, 04:12:27 PM »
Ooohh, how do you like them green apples now!
Logged
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...