of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 24, 2024, 06:01:51 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228741
Posts in
43282
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Off Topic
Bad Obsession
Jane's Addiction
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
8
9
Author
Topic: Jane's Addiction (Read 52827 times)
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #100 on:
December 10, 2009, 02:23:32 PM »
A short interview with Dave Navarro before the LAYN event where his gives advise to upcoming artists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb_uu9l85c0
«
Last Edit: December 10, 2009, 02:29:19 PM by FunkyMonkey
»
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #101 on:
January 19, 2010, 01:33:21 PM »
JANE'S ADDICTION Heads Into Studio - Jan. 19, 2010
According to The Pulse of Radio, the original lineup of JANE'S ADDICTION headed into the studio on Monday (January 18) to begin writing new material, although it's too early to say whether this will result in the band recording its fourth full-length studio album. According to Stereokill.net, singer Perry Farrell revealed the news by responding to a fan's question about whether the group would write new songs at the band's Facebook page, writing, "Monday we get together to write new music and craft a future."
This is the second time since reuniting in the fall of 2008 that JANE'S ADDICTION has attempted to begin work on a new project. The band entered a studio last spring, but Farrell told The Pulse of Radio that it didn't work out too well that time. "You know, I'll be honest with you," he said. "We started to record and things got kind of ugly (laughs). You know, it's one of those things where the headbutting really came out when we tried to write and people were like, 'Well, I don't like that . . . ' But you know what? I'm very patient, because it's only been, what, 18 years, so I can't expect things overnight to be perfect."
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=133693
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #102 on:
January 19, 2010, 03:42:05 PM »
Brilliant news!!!!
Im so glad they are giving it another go.
Logged
html sucks
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #103 on:
January 21, 2010, 07:38:46 AM »
fuck
quote from Erics twitter.
Quote
ericavery
fyi, to answer the question directly, i am not writing with janes addiction.
sucks
Logged
html sucks
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #104 on:
January 23, 2010, 03:08:36 PM »
From Perry Farrell:
David, Stephen, and I with new writing partner, went into the garage. Felt like old days, except no cassette recorder. Crafting w/Protools.
We are working on getting Jane's to S. America my friends. In discussion now w/ promoters
We have a different lineup than Coachella it is true. It won't be revealed for a while remember; we are in August.
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #105 on:
January 23, 2010, 07:53:25 PM »
fuck. sorry, as much as i enjoyed the third album. if Janes do new material, i want original line up!
Logged
html sucks
faldor
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7700
I'm Ron Burgundy?
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #106 on:
January 23, 2010, 08:40:04 PM »
Saw this over at
www.gnrevolution.com
http://xiola.org/
wow, so it's been an active 3 days or so.
duff mckagan
might be the mysterious writing partner/bassist, that perry spoke about. Jane's Addiction got together in perry farrell's garage on monday without eric avery, but with a new writing partner. we assumed the writing partner would also be a bassist to fill in where eric is leaving.
if yr not familiar with duff mckagan, he was the original bassist for guns n roses. i personally haven't kept up with him beyond that, but i've always thought he was a great bassist and his song writing is also decent for rock/punk genres. i personally like duff, he seems like a nice guy and he just may be a good fit with dave and stephen's metal/rock roots. so i'm not completely opposed to this.
here's what i am opposed to: calling it jane's addiction. i realize jane's addiction carries more weight than any band the 3 core members have ever been in and it will definitely bring in the cash. the truth is though, with duff on board, this is gonna be even more rock sounding than strays was and maybe that's the point. i realize bob ezrin was brought in to make jane's addiction rock. what seperated jane's addiction from guns n roses, motely crue, bon jovi, was the fact that there was a softer artistic, feminine touch. perry's and eric's influences merged with dave and stephen's influences made the band unique.
so go ahead abandon yr roots, abandon the very thing that made jane's addiction a once mighty band. rock yr arse off, but drop jane's addiction off and resist relying on nostalgia to sell tickets and downloads. do the right thing by all of yr loyal fans and stop raping the jane's addiction name.
but then again, does it matter? perry farrell's twitter: "I have to remember: Those that matter don't mind, and those that mind don't matter." my suggestion, stop quoting drivel and write something brilliant, or none of it's gonna matter.
Logged
If you're waiting...don't. Live your life. That's your responsibility not mine. If it were not to happen you won't have missed a thing. If in fact it does you might get something that works for you.
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #107 on:
January 24, 2010, 11:20:55 AM »
guns n roses are on a completely different page to motley crue
motley crue are on a completely different page to bon jovi.
To be fair, Duff is probably the better pick of a songwriter, gnr n janes came out together in the late 80s, and they rehersed next door to each other, and all knew each other.
Logged
html sucks
faldor
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7700
I'm Ron Burgundy?
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #108 on:
January 24, 2010, 01:02:48 PM »
Quote from: mrlee on January 24, 2010, 11:20:55 AM
guns n roses are on a completely different page to motley crue
motley crue are on a completely different page to bon jovi.
To be fair, Duff is probably the better pick of a songwriter, gnr n janes came out together in the late 80s, and they rehersed next door to each other, and all knew each other.
Yeah I don't think the guy is making a very fair comparison between GNR and other 80's bands. Doesn't seem that he's too well versed in Guns N' Roses. I think Duff would be a fine choice for them.
Logged
If you're waiting...don't. Live your life. That's your responsibility not mine. If it were not to happen you won't have missed a thing. If in fact it does you might get something that works for you.
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #109 on:
January 24, 2010, 06:36:13 PM »
Quote from: faldor on January 24, 2010, 01:02:48 PM
Quote from: mrlee on January 24, 2010, 11:20:55 AM
guns n roses are on a completely different page to motley crue
motley crue are on a completely different page to bon jovi.
To be fair, Duff is probably the better pick of a songwriter, gnr n janes came out together in the late 80s, and they rehersed next door to each other, and all knew each other.
Yeah I don't think the guy is making a very fair comparison between GNR and other 80's bands. Doesn't seem that he's too well versed in Guns N' Roses. I think Duff would be a fine choice for them.
i can understand his anger at the guys for again, fuckin Eric over, i wanted a true Janes Addiction album this time around.
But its hardly the guy they picks fault.
And plus, he says Janes were softer than Bon Jovi? The fuck!?!
Logged
html sucks
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #110 on:
January 31, 2010, 12:26:47 PM »
From Perry Farrell:
This year we have a stack of music for release. One of the tracks is Underground. Look for it to drop in the fall.
about 16 hours ago from web
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #111 on:
February 11, 2010, 11:49:33 AM »
Smashing Pumpkins to tour with Jane?s Addiction?
According to Mike Gentile, general manager at the First Niagara Pavilion, tours that may be headed to town include those featuring Maroon Five, Iron Maiden, the Jonas Brothers and a double bill with Smashing Pumpkins and Jane's Addiction.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/ae/music/s_666225.html
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #112 on:
February 11, 2010, 06:02:37 PM »
id go see that if they came to the UK.
Janes rule, loved them with NIN.
And Smashing Pumpkins are a misunderstood, and under-rated band.
Logged
html sucks
makane
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1518
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #113 on:
February 11, 2010, 09:25:51 PM »
Quote from: mrlee on February 11, 2010, 06:02:37 PM
id go see that if they came to the UK.
Janes rule, loved them with NIN.
And Smashing Pumpkins are a misunderstood, and under-rated band.
I don't think so. They definitely had their day, and to be honest they've done nothing recently to be praised for.
Logged
YagetoutonyourownAndyoutakeallthatyouownAndyouforgetaboutyourhomeAndthenyou'rejustfuckin'gone!
Butch Français
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4511
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #114 on:
February 27, 2010, 01:32:50 AM »
Quote from: faldor on January 23, 2010, 08:40:04 PM
Saw this over at
www.gnrevolution.com
http://xiola.org/
wow, so it's been an active 3 days or so.
duff mckagan
might be the mysterious writing partner/bassist, that perry spoke about. Jane's Addiction got together in perry farrell's garage on monday without eric avery, but with a new writing partner. we assumed the writing partner would also be a bassist to fill in where eric is leaving.
if yr not familiar with duff mckagan, he was the original bassist for guns n roses. i personally haven't kept up with him beyond that, but i've always thought he was a great bassist and his song writing is also decent for rock/punk genres. i personally like duff, he seems like a nice guy and he just may be a good fit with dave and stephen's metal/rock roots. so i'm not completely opposed to this.
here's what i am opposed to: calling it jane's addiction. i realize jane's addiction carries more weight than any band the 3 core members have ever been in and it will definitely bring in the cash. the truth is though, with duff on board, this is gonna be even more rock sounding than strays was and maybe that's the point. i realize bob ezrin was brought in to make jane's addiction rock. what seperated jane's addiction from guns n roses, motely crue, bon jovi, was the fact that there was a softer artistic, feminine touch. perry's and eric's influences merged with dave and stephen's influences made the band unique.
so go ahead abandon yr roots, abandon the very thing that made jane's addiction a once mighty band. rock yr arse off, but drop jane's addiction off and resist relying on nostalgia to sell tickets and downloads. do the right thing by all of yr loyal fans and stop raping the jane's addiction name.
but then again, does it matter? perry farrell's twitter: "I have to remember: Those that matter don't mind, and those that mind don't matter." my suggestion, stop quoting drivel and write something brilliant, or none of it's gonna matter.
Im really fucking excited about this!
if there's anyone that could fill the void of Eric Avery, it would be Duff or Flea.
Im speaking in terms of groove and creativity, here....this could be huge! not expecting Duff to stay in JA and tour with them (though it would be fucking awesome if he did), but I hope he writes and records their entire next album with them. I think that would be really huge for both JA and Duff.
gigantic fan of both of them!
Logged
of course there is no us and them, but them they do not think the same
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6677
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #115 on:
February 27, 2010, 08:18:55 AM »
Quote from: makane on February 11, 2010, 09:25:51 PM
Quote from: mrlee on February 11, 2010, 06:02:37 PM
id go see that if they came to the UK.
Janes rule, loved them with NIN.
And Smashing Pumpkins are a misunderstood, and under-rated band.
I don't think so. They definitely had their day, and to be honest they've done nothing recently to be praised for.
Sure, they are of the time. But their peak material is great stuff!
i could say the same about NIN! Havent liked anything theyve done since With Teeth-uh.
Logged
html sucks
Halo69
Banned
VIP
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 1191
Here Today...
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #116 on:
February 27, 2010, 08:39:50 AM »
Can't get into them for some reason
Logged
Oh My God i cant deny this...
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #117 on:
March 01, 2010, 05:04:27 PM »
It's official, Eric Avery has quit Jane's Addiction.
thats it. with equal parts regret and relief, the janes addiction experiment is at an end.
about 10 hours ago via TweetDeck
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
FunkyMonkey
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 11085
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #118 on:
March 03, 2010, 04:31:40 PM »
Here is Dave Navarro's Peta Ad, poster and video at the link:
Rocker Dave Navarro Bares It All for Animals
Dave Navarro rocks. Whether he's touring with Jane's Addiction, hosting his radio show Dark Matter, or posing nude for PETA, he does it with the style and intensity fitting of a rock star. Dave's latest gig is helping animals by baring it all in an ad for PETA's "Ink, Not Mink" series. Helping animals has never looked so good!
https://secure.peta.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=2949
Logged
Shut the fuck up. Yes, you. Ha!
Halo69
Banned
VIP
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 1191
Here Today...
Re: Jane's Addiction
«
Reply #119 on:
March 16, 2010, 03:25:32 PM »
Im trying to give a second opportunity to this band, and im listening to their greatest hits "Up from the Catacombs", i love the sounds, they-re really modern and cool, however im still not catching the frontman's voice.... Its quite irritating to be honest, just the way sings and his voice
Its a shame though cause i really love the guitars, drums and bass. Its so sad when the only thing u dont like is the vocals on a band.
Logged
Oh My God i cant deny this...
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
8
9
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...