Merck Has 21 Days Left

[ARC]

21 days (3 weeks) until 2005 is officially over.

Merck indicated that 2005 would be "the year for GNR"...

Time running out Merck.

[DunkinDave]

Merck has proven he has no credibility with regards to release dates.

Anything he says regarding Guns N' Roses is propaganda used to generate interest and make money.

[Luigi]

Sorry but Merck don't know Dick How can something that was, be, I don't know if thats possible

[jameslofton29]

21 days (3 weeks) until 2005 is officially over.

Merck indicated that 2005 would be "the year for GNR"...

Time running out Merck.

Merck and others telling us to speculate about the Da Vinci Code rumor was there way out of the 'year of GNR' comment. They knew people would get excited over it, and forget about his past lame comments. I also think this Amazon shit was intentionally put out there to keep people excited. Forget about 2005. Its over. Start dreaming of 2006. If nothing concrete happens by June, start the speculation for 2007.

[Pinball Wizard]

21 days (3 weeks) until 2005 is officially over.

Merck indicated that 2005 would be "the year for GNR"...

Time running out Merck.

Merck and others telling us to speculate about the Da Vinci Code rumor was there way out of the 'year of GNR' comment. They knew people would get excited over it, and forget about his past lame comments. I also think this Amazon shit was intentionally put out there to keep people excited. Forget about 2005. Its over. Start dreaming of 2006. If nothing concrete happens by June, start the speculation for 2007.

And then for 2008, 2009, 2010...this shit will never end!

[providman]

Merck has proven he has no credibility with regards to release dates.

Anything he says regarding Guns N' Roses is propaganda used to generate interest and make money.

And that most certainly goes for his "reply" to the Jeff Leeds article, too.

[-Jack-]

It will be intresting to see if the man even apologizes.. or if there will be a press release concerning the album by the end of the year. Who knows?

[Eternal Flaming Sword of Death...]

why break precedence?

[Jonx]

Who Cares, the 2005 comment was made in passing where alot of other bands were also mentioned. At the end of the day Merck is on Axls payroll so he does what Axl says. As we all know from experience Axls plans change alot. Its not Mercks fault, he is meerly doing his job, serving as Axls manager.

Leave the guy alone, he has enough problems

Jonx

[Judge Dredd]

'Engage brain before opening mouth.'

Maybe Merck hasn't got this particular fortune cookie from his local Chinese takeaway.

[Where is Hassan Nasrallah ?]

21 days (3 weeks) until 2005 is officially over.

Merck indicated that 2005 would be "the year for GNR"...

Time running out Merck.

he didnt say it'd be the year of GNR for WHO ? maybe it' was the year of GNR  for him and axl
and, well, technically, for us, every year is the year of gnr

[jarmo]

Didn't he make the statement in March? Maybe things have changed since then....

Of course, things aren't allowed to change in the GN'R world. 



/jarmo

[ARC]

he didnt say it'd be the year of GNR for WHO ?

"His (Axls) only interest is making the best ALBUM he is capable of so that IT CAN HAVE a positive affect in 2005 on people who are enthusiasts of music and interested in Guns N' Roses..."

Merck's exact comment. I've highlighted the key words.

[Where is Hassan Nasrallah ?]

he didnt say it'd be the year of GNR for WHO ?

"His (Axls) only interest is making the best ALBUM he is capable of so that IT CAN HAVE a positive affect in 2005 on people who are enthusiasts of music and interested in Guns N' Roses..."

Merck's exact comment. I've highlighted the key words.

well the making of the album is interesting enough

[ARC]

well the making of the album is interesting enough

Not enough for me, I'd rather hear the thing.

[Mikkamakka]

Sorry but Merck don't know Dick How can something that was, be, I don't know if thats possible

It's interesting. Didn't Caram Constanzo say something like only three people know the state of the album: Axl, Merck and him? Or he mentioned only himself and Uncle Axl?

BTW I don't believe anything they say about the album's status. All of them were proved wrong for multiple times.

[jameslofton29]

Of course, things aren't allowed to change in the GN'R world.?



/jarmo

And whose fault is that?

[ppbebe]

Yours?

he didnt say it'd be the year of GNR for WHO ?

"His (Axls) only interest is making the best ALBUM he is capable of so that IT CAN HAVE a positive affect in 2005 on people who are enthusiasts of music and interested in Guns N' Roses..."

Merck's exact comment. I've highlighted the key words.

well the making of the album is interesting enough

And Surely he and his band mates have had a positive affect throughout the year on those who are enthusiasts of music and interested in Guns N' Roses, e. g. ME!
We were accidentally treated to another new tune which loveliness was even beyond our expectation.

Good posts WAT-EVER. It's been a long time since I saw your post as considerate as these last.

[jameslofton29]

I would love to know why its my fault.

[killingvector]

If the situation did change in the GnR world,  a statement regarding a change in intent would be greatly appreciated. Simply eating your words in silence doesn't lend the man much credibility.