of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 28, 2024, 10:17:53 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228806
Posts in
43285
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Guns N' Roses
Guns N' Roses
3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
All
Author
Topic: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world (Read 10752 times)
ppbebe
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 10203
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #20 on:
October 12, 2005, 02:43:42 PM »
a few hits for an album might have been a mid 80s thingy, don't you think?
Logged
Neemo
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 6118
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #21 on:
October 12, 2005, 02:47:13 PM »
Quote from: ppbebe on October 12, 2005, 02:43:42 PM
a few hits for an album might have been a mid 80s thingy, don't you think?
TOTALLY, it never happens anymore, it seems (to me) that bands and record companies just want 1 or 2 singles to get famous and sell records the rest is usually all filler.
That certainly wasn't always the case though, AFD and UYI's are prime examples
Logged
GNR
evol
ution
Carlos_f_Rose
Guest
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #22 on:
October 12, 2005, 08:02:08 PM »
Quote from: nesquick on October 12, 2005, 06:14:24 AM
I was listening to "Thriller" of Michael jackson, all the legend around this album is about the? successive Top 3: Beat it- Billie jean- Thriller. Those 3 consecutive songs blow everything away. You can't resist, it's genius. The rest of the album is good, but what makes this album so legendary is definitelly this Top 3. It may be something to think about for the Chinese Democracy record. 3 consecutive songs that would blow everything away, just 3.
well good post man, but I think at this pace, Chinese Democracy needs 100% of excellent songs, anyway it is gonna fail ...
Logged
Axl4Prez2004
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4387
2007 AND 2011 HTGTH Fantasy Football Champ!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #23 on:
October 12, 2005, 08:59:47 PM »
Carlos GMS said, "anyway, it will fail." I don't agree with that opinion. For God's sake, we have heard no studio tracks, none, zero, nada.
3 good songs? Trust me, the music will kick ass which makes this whole thing a success in my eyes.
I'm currently drooling over the prospects of clean studio versions of Maddy, IRS, and The Blues, that's 3 right there. Don't even fuck with me saying those aren't great songs. The music will be great...the marketing of this thing will be difficult. Will the record-buying public forgive Axl for the lost years and the perceived Axl-caused break-up of the old band? Will the record-stealing internet pirates screw with figures? It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. I have confidence in W. Axl Rose.
Logged
7-14-16 Philadelphia, PA
5-13-14 Bethlehem, PA
2-24-12 Atlantic City, NJ
11-26-11 Camden, NJ
11-5-06 Meadowlands, NJ
5-12-06 Hammerstein, NY, NY
12-2-02 Boston, MA
7-25-92 Buffalo,
mikegiuliana
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7571
I'm a llama!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #24 on:
October 13, 2005, 08:22:20 AM »
Quote from: madagas on October 12, 2005, 07:51:28 AM
You mean 3 succesive singles like Jungle, SCOM, and PC. That is why AFD did so well-think about it. Three incredibly perfect radio rock songs. Great singles drive album sales.
there really aren't three songs like that since.. Not only classics but awesome music from a debut album..
As far as CD goes I have no idea what's on it. or what the big guns were and may be now so I say lets just wait and see before we start using thriller in refrence to CD. I also don't think rock songs are going to have the power that R&B or rap will as singles these days.. I doubt cd will be like an usher album from last year.. rock crosses very few but pop rnb or rap crosses many fans .. In america a rap album or single gets big in the c;lubs and every nationality buys these.. Look at how hollaback girl is doing.. 1,000,000 downloads(legal) That's because gwen has the marketing ability to cross over to every kind of music fan.. Rock usually doesn't have that same affect where blacks whites and spanish are all buying albums/singles.
Logged
BD888
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 187
I'm a llama!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #25 on:
October 13, 2005, 08:34:06 AM »
Quote from: mikegiuliana on October 13, 2005, 08:22:20 AM
Quote from: madagas on October 12, 2005, 07:51:28 AM
You mean 3 succesive singles like Jungle, SCOM, and PC. That is why AFD did so well-think about it. Three incredibly perfect radio rock songs. Great singles drive album sales.
there really aren't three songs like that since.. Not only classics but awesome music from a debut album..
As far as CD goes I have no idea what's on it. or what the big guns were and may be now so I say lets just wait and see before we start using thriller in refrence to CD. I also don't think rock songs are going to have the power that R&B or rap will as singles these days.. I doubt cd will be like an usher album from last year.. rock crosses very few but pop rnb or rap crosses many fans .. In america a rap album or single gets big in the c;lubs and every nationality buys these.. Look at how hollaback girl is doing.. 1,000,000 downloads(legal) That's because gwen has the marketing ability to cross over to every kind of music fan.. Rock usually doesn't have that same affect where blacks whites and spanish are all buying albums/singles.
Maybe Axl should duet with Enrique Iglesias...
Logged
mikegiuliana
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7571
I'm a llama!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #26 on:
October 13, 2005, 08:35:28 AM »
Quote from: BD888 on October 13, 2005, 08:34:06 AM
Quote from: mikegiuliana on October 13, 2005, 08:22:20 AM
Quote from: madagas on October 12, 2005, 07:51:28 AM
You mean 3 succesive singles like Jungle, SCOM, and PC. That is why AFD did so well-think about it. Three incredibly perfect radio rock songs. Great singles drive album sales.
there really aren't three songs like that since.. Not only classics but awesome music from a debut album..
As far as CD goes I have no idea what's on it. or what the big guns were and may be now so I say lets just wait and see before we start using thriller in refrence to CD. I also don't think rock songs are going to have the power that R&B or rap will as singles these days.. I doubt cd will be like an usher album from last year.. rock crosses very few but pop rnb or rap crosses many fans .. In america a rap album or single gets big in the c;lubs and every nationality buys these.. Look at how hollaback girl is doing.. 1,000,000 downloads(legal) That's because gwen has the marketing ability to cross over to every kind of music fan.. Rock usually doesn't have that same affect where blacks whites and spanish are all buying albums/singles.
Maybe Axl should duet with Enrique Iglesias...
no ricky martin.. hell run dmc helped aerosmith get back on their feet.. Nothing like J-Z n linkin park though.. Well didn't axl sing with shaq back in the day
Logged
BD888
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 187
I'm a llama!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #27 on:
October 13, 2005, 08:37:52 AM »
Quote from: mikegiuliana on October 13, 2005, 08:35:28 AM
Quote from: BD888 on October 13, 2005, 08:34:06 AM
Quote from: mikegiuliana on October 13, 2005, 08:22:20 AM
Quote from: madagas on October 12, 2005, 07:51:28 AM
You mean 3 succesive singles like Jungle, SCOM, and PC. That is why AFD did so well-think about it. Three incredibly perfect radio rock songs. Great singles drive album sales.
there really aren't three songs like that since.. Not only classics but awesome music from a debut album..
As far as CD goes I have no idea what's on it. or what the big guns were and may be now so I say lets just wait and see before we start using thriller in refrence to CD. I also don't think rock songs are going to have the power that R&B or rap will as singles these days.. I doubt cd will be like an usher album from last year.. rock crosses very few but pop rnb or rap crosses many fans .. In america a rap album or single gets big in the c;lubs and every nationality buys these.. Look at how hollaback girl is doing.. 1,000,000 downloads(legal) That's because gwen has the marketing ability to cross over to every kind of music fan.. Rock usually doesn't have that same affect where blacks whites and spanish are all buying albums/singles.
Maybe Axl should duet with Enrique Iglesias...
no ricky martin.. hell run dmc helped aerosmith get back on their feet.. Nothing like J-Z n linkin park though.. Well didn't axl sing with shaq back in the day
Axl should let Pharrell Williams produce the album. That would gurantee multi-platinum status, as everything Pharell has touched has gone platinum.
Logged
mikegiuliana
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7571
I'm a llama!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #28 on:
October 13, 2005, 08:50:55 AM »
Quote from: BD888 on October 13, 2005, 08:37:52 AM
Quote from: mikegiuliana on October 13, 2005, 08:35:28 AM
Quote from: BD888 on October 13, 2005, 08:34:06 AM
Quote from: mikegiuliana on October 13, 2005, 08:22:20 AM
Quote from: madagas on October 12, 2005, 07:51:28 AM
You mean 3 succesive singles like Jungle, SCOM, and PC. That is why AFD did so well-think about it. Three incredibly perfect radio rock songs. Great singles drive album sales.
there really aren't three songs like that since.. Not only classics but awesome music from a debut album..
As far as CD goes I have no idea what's on it. or what the big guns were and may be now so I say lets just wait and see before we start using thriller in refrence to CD. I also don't think rock songs are going to have the power that R&B or rap will as singles these days.. I doubt cd will be like an usher album from last year.. rock crosses very few but pop rnb or rap crosses many fans .. In america a rap album or single gets big in the c;lubs and every nationality buys these.. Look at how hollaback girl is doing.. 1,000,000 downloads(legal) That's because gwen has the marketing ability to cross over to every kind of music fan.. Rock usually doesn't have that same affect where blacks whites and spanish are all buying albums/singles.
Maybe Axl should duet with Enrique Iglesias...
no ricky martin.. hell run dmc helped aerosmith get back on their feet.. Nothing like J-Z n linkin park though.. Well didn't axl sing with shaq back in the day
Axl should let Pharrell Williams produce the album. That would gurantee multi-platinum status, as everything Pharell has touched has gone platinum.
the name gnr is very well respected today.. No more of the back lash of grunge saying gnr was some 80's hairband so I think the name itself should get them back into it.. I wouldn't be suprised if a day of mtv was dedicated to guns n roses of old to introduce anyone who was in a coma.. This album should do really good just because of the name and how people view them as classic rockers..
Logged
pilferk
The Riddler
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 11724
Marmite Militia, taking over one piece of toast at a time!!!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #29 on:
October 13, 2005, 09:52:53 AM »
Quote from: madagas on October 12, 2005, 07:51:28 AM
You mean 3 succesive singles like Jungle, SCOM, and PC. That is why AFD did so well-think about it. Three incredibly perfect radio rock songs. Great singles drive album sales.
Funny, I instantly thought the same thing.
The "triad" thing really does seem to be an overwhelming constant to "great" albums.
Think of any classic album and you almost instantly think of 3 great songs..boom, boom, boom.
Logged
Together again,
Gee, it's good to be together again,
I just can't imagine that you've ever been gone
It's not starting over, it's just going on
madagas
Guest
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #30 on:
October 13, 2005, 10:24:03 AM »
Not that I'm a big Green Day fan, but their first three singles for American Idiot were pretty damn catchy. That is why it was so successful in relation to other recent rock albums. I'm not sure Axl has those radio friendly songs in him. He seems to prefer longer songs or songs with some form of profanity where radio won't play it. I thought the Illusion singles (I consider the Illusions more heavily Axl influenced) were weak in comparison to the other great album tracks such as Estranged, Locomotive, and Coma. Estranged made it to Mtv but not radio due to it's length (and the fact that Nov Rain already was on the radio). Whereas AFD'S three best tracks are the singles and were perfect for radio. Now, when I hear Merck mention "challenging and epic", radio friendly does not come to mind.
Logged
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3286
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #31 on:
October 13, 2005, 11:30:11 AM »
well, we know almost for sure that IRS for example is ca. 4-5 minutes long. chinese democracy, rhyiad and oh my god are about 3 minutes long. maddy and the blues are ....5 minutes long (i`m not sure at the moment) and songs like prostitute will probably be around 5 minutes long ,too.
so there probably won`t be that much songs on CD that are more than 5 minutes long.
and i consider IRS very radio friendly. from what we`ve heard prostitute will be a killer song, too.
i don`t think the succes of chinese democracy will basically depend on the quality of the music, because i think that it will be killer without a doubt, but on the promotion and how the press reacts because of the long time it took to come out and the new band.
Logged
Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
Neemo
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 6118
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #32 on:
October 13, 2005, 11:54:51 AM »
Quote from: WARose on October 13, 2005, 11:30:11 AM
from what we`ve heard prostitute will be a killer song, too.
i don`t think the succes of chinese democracy will basically depend on the quality of the music, because i think that it will be killer without a doubt, but on the promotion and how the press reacts because of the long time it took to come out and the new band.
But it's thinking like that, that will make CD a letdown. We have NO idea how prostitute sounds, we haven't
HEARD
shit.
Personally, I really don't give a shit how well it sells, I want to music to be good. Some of my favorite CDs aren't #1 sellers or even close, I love Days of the New & Candlebox just to name a couple. To me those 2 bands were fucking amazing, (and I personally think Weiland is great but if Travis Meeks would've sang for VR it would've been incredible) but with the exception of one single each both bands are virtually unknown (and broken up now i believe), but both bands have 3 albums each and I think they are all great. As long as the music is fulfilling to me personally, that's all I care about. I don't buy all the hype shit, "oh, CD will be the best album ever, it's challenging and epic" I'll buy the album and judge it for myself and I'll decide for myself about the
EPICNESS
of it. I like the music I like cuz I like it, not cuz you like it, or merck likes it, or 5 million who-the-fuck-evers like it. ya know what i'm sayin'
If a CD sells a bazzillion copies but it sucks balls, who cares, you will never listen to it again (eg i wish i would've never bought St Anger). I'd rather have a band with a small fanbase and amazing tunes then a band like Blink182 with shitloads of album sales but crappy music (of course its just IMHO)
It's all about the music not the money..... to me anyway
«
Last Edit: October 13, 2005, 12:01:04 PM by Neemo
»
Logged
GNR
evol
ution
ppbebe
Legend
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 10203
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #33 on:
October 13, 2005, 12:22:22 PM »
You're not alone Neemo. To me music is all about me! ie how I like it.
Quote from: WARose on October 13, 2005, 11:30:11 AM
well, we know almost for sure that IRS for example is ca. 4-5 minutes long. chinese democracy, rhyiad and oh my god are about 3 minutes long. maddy and the blues are ....5 minutes long (i`m not sure at the moment) and songs like prostitute will probably be around 5 minutes long ,too.
so there probably won`t be that much songs on CD that are more than 5 minutes long.
and i consider IRS very radio friendly. from what we`ve heard prostitute will be a killer song, too.
I beg to differ. I said this in the other thread,
I gather from what Tommy said, (he didn't get a chance to hear all of the mixed songs cos he was pressed for time) The 6 the of pretty epics Tommy hadn't heard finished till then and managed to hear might be indeed quite long. (Then again You don't just have one go to check out the mind-blowing pieces you worked on.) Maybe they are the orchestral ones. He says A few of the songs are pretty epic in length and all the six are fucking huge epics.
Assuming NR is a regular epic in length,
how huge you think they are?
Quote
i don`t think the succes of chinese democracy will basically depend on the quality of the music, because i think that it will be killer without a doubt, but on the promotion and how the press reacts
Amen to that.
Logged
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3286
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #34 on:
October 13, 2005, 12:35:11 PM »
well you missunderstood me i think. i don`t care if CD sells well or not. the only reason why the sales are important is that axl probably won`t release another album if CD flops and i think he needs "satisfaction".
i just wanted to say that CD will most likely feature a bunch of short and maybe even radio friendly songs.
but i don`t care if it sells well or not. just like to you , the music is the important part to me, but i think that the music AND the sales will be great.
and do you think i listen to gnr because it`s popular and 5 million " who-the-fuck-ever`s" listen to it, too??
Logged
Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
sandman
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3448
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #35 on:
October 13, 2005, 12:56:57 PM »
interesting topic. here's some random thoughts...
1. creating three "classic" songs is much easier said than done. it involves luck and some things that are out of the artists control.
2. i'm guessing the direction axl is going will not produce mega-hits on the radio. just my guess. i could be wrong. ?
3. i think it takes more than three songs for an album to be considered classic. there were some hugely successful albums throughout the 90's (pearl jam, nirvana, no doubt, alanis morrissette, hooty, etc.). each of those had more than 3 hits on the radio.
4. AND most classic albums contain songs that, although never offical hits on the radio, are cult classics. (for example, i think it's so easy is one of the greatest songs ever made.) ?
Logged
"We're from Philly, fuckin' Philly. No one likes us, we don't care."
(Jason Kelce, Philadelphia Eagles, February 8, 2018
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3286
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #36 on:
October 13, 2005, 01:05:28 PM »
Quote from: sandman on October 13, 2005, 12:56:57 PM
interesting topic. here's some random thoughts...
1. creating three "classic" songs is much easier said than done. it involves luck and some things that are out of the artists control.
2. i'm guessing the direction axl is going will not produce mega-hits on the radio. just my guess. i could be wrong.
3. i think it takes more than three songs for an album to be considered classic. there were some hugely successful albums throughout the 90's (pearl jam, nirvana, no doubt, alanis morrissette, hooty, etc.). each of those had more than 3 hits on the radio.
4. AND most classic albums contain songs that, although never offical hits on the radio, are cult classics. (for example, i think it's so easy is one of the greatest songs ever made.)
it`s so easy was actually released as a single if i`m not wrong.... but you`re definitely right
Logged
Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
Neemo
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 6118
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #37 on:
October 13, 2005, 01:18:52 PM »
Quote from: WARose on October 13, 2005, 12:35:11 PM
well? ? ?you missunderstood me i think. i don`t care if CD sells well or not. the only reason why the sales are important is that axl probably won`t release another album if CD flops and i think he needs "satisfaction".
i just wanted to say that CD will most likely feature a bunch of short and maybe even radio friendly songs.
but i don`t care if it sells well or not. just like to you , the music is the important part to me, but i think that the music AND the sales will be great.
and do you think i listen to gnr because it`s popular and 5 million " who-the-fuck-ever`s" listen to it, too??
No i didn't mean that and i didn't mean to sound angry on my post so i hope you didn't take it that way. ?
I'm just saying that everyone (well not everyone but alot of people) on here seems to think that the whole GnR Machine is based on money:
"the optimum time to release the album" (ie 2nd week of November)
"That they need a popular "image" to gather "new" fans"
"Radio Friendly songs"
"worrying about how well GH is selling, cuz apparently the success of that Piece of Trash is integral to the sales figures of the "impending" release CD"
"What songs they
should
play
IF
they ever tour again"
"How much Promotion time is neccesary to
make it
sell big"
"He needs (and wants) the best first day sales and 1st week sales of all time"
the list goes on and on and its quite rediculous, the more expectations you put on it the more disappointed you'll be.
If Axl wanted GnR to be just a money grab, I doubt he would wait this long to release something. (I would think more along the lines of an album every 2 or 3 years if it ws all about the money) that's all I'm saying.
With a time frame like we have been subjected to, I think, Axl wants this thing to be perfect (to him anyway) and when it's done I think he'll drop it whether It falls in november or january or on easter or on labour day. If it's good it'll sell, if it's not it'll flop, but I think all Axl cares about is that he's happy with it (I'm not saying that he won't want record sales mind you, I'm sure the more the better, but i don't think it's his #1 priority). and I also think he wants to show Slash, Duff, Steven & Izzy that he doesn't need them to make good music.
(This are my opinions only, not meant to be read as fact or like i know whats in Axl's head or anything like that, For all i know i could be totally fucking wrong about everything)
«
Last Edit: October 13, 2005, 01:28:32 PM by Neemo
»
Logged
GNR
evol
ution
mikegiuliana
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7571
I'm a llama!
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #38 on:
October 13, 2005, 01:54:10 PM »
Quote
i don`t think the succes of chinese democracy will basically depend on the quality of the music,
Iwould love to see how many albums of this album sell purely on the fact it is a new gnr album probably going to be marketed as first new work in 14 years or however many years it will be by the time it comes out?? This puppy can sell a million with a blank CD
Logged
gilld1
Banned
VIP
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1047
Spiraling up through the crack in the skye...
Re: 3 successive classics are enough to embrase the world
«
Reply #39 on:
October 13, 2005, 05:17:36 PM »
The strength of an album is not in the singles, it's in the other songs that you don't here on the radio. Look at how many hidden gems the Stones have or Zepplin.
From what I have heard and seen at 2 New GNR shows, the new stuff had better get better. The Blues, Mad, etc. are decent songs but not classic. I don't think they will capture the attention of the masses. I think we've all made ourselves believe that these new songs are great because it's all we've had for son long. OMG, CD, and Silkworms are weak at best.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
All
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...