I have no doubt the band amassed a great deal of material during the first few years of writing, although that doesn't mean a lot of it will ever be released. It's not unusual for bands to have 50 or so songs for contention for an album. Comments made by Dizzy that there are several versions of the selected songs and the comments by Tommy that the final mixes he heard recently were stuff that he hadn't heard for a "long time" makes me think that the track listings that originally were floating around a few years ago are going to be a hell of a lot closer to what will actually appear on the album than people think, with maybe one or two new titles. Thats if Axl ever releases anything at all again.? ?
true, you get alot of brainstorming n riffs for songs and then work on them and you'll have to chose what makes the final cut..
I wonder if there is an album besides cd that is mastered and ready to go if needed, meaning the mass production of the master cd is the only thing needed for sales..? I seriously doubt we'll get a album per year deal which I've read about so much on the forums.. The idea so many songs were mentioned to be old by dizzy shows the album was supposed to be much sooner and shows the possibility that the old songs might have a few versions that can be counted as more then one song..
So we might just be getting one large album, nothing indicates anything but one album, those old interviews are useless as a refrence because everything changes.. If there was a master plan of several albums it would be mentioned more often, the weight of cd would be lifted, it would be mentioned cd might not be done but we have two other albums completly done either way.. It's ther worst marketing ever if they have so much material.. The (some) material could possibly be dated, meaning maybe axl tried doing industrial songs and now that era has passed...
Author