Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 26, 2024, 04:36:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228775 Posts in 43283 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
| |-+  Solo & side projects + Ex-members
| | |-+  Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
| | | |-+  A 3rd album in early '09?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: A 3rd album in early '09?  (Read 7243 times)
CheapJon
spam egg spam spam bacon and spam, spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam
Legend
*****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 11087


lstn mfx 2 diz song dat shud b hurd


« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2007, 05:32:30 PM »


slash, duff and izzy should start a new band (not reunite with Axl, but maybe put their shit behind)

oh yes, with bon jovi? hihi

i'd rather have scott then bon jovi rofl
Logged
ibelieveinaxl
It's a bad obsession...
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 782


Ain't goin' down.....


« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2007, 08:26:24 PM »

The lack of solos on Contraband was because Slash felt restricted. He wanted to save money and ended up recording guitars in some small studio where he didn't feel comfortable (according to his book).

Then Libertad was done with Brendan and everybody seemed happy because the band had played together longer.

So if Libertad was the best they can do, why would the next album be that different?


Rick Rubin wanted them to write more songs, they didn't want that. They wanted to record the stuff they had.

Considering 2009 is about 14 months away and they have some tours to finish, it doesn't seem like they'll have much time to work on an album if they wanna get it out in early 2009.




/jarmo



actually, they have time to do another album and tour. these guys dont need years to record.
Logged

Where does it come from? All this hatred.

1988-Today: 71 shows and counting....
jarmo
If you're reading this, you've just wasted valuable time!
Administrator
Legend
*****

Karma: 9
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 38952


"You're an idiot"


WWW
« Reply #22 on: November 07, 2007, 08:53:26 PM »

actually, they have time to do another album and tour. these guys dont need years to record.


Yeah, exactly. They have time to repeat the same thing they did with Contraband and Libertad.

My point was that if they want to try something new, there might not be enough time....





/jarmo
Logged

Disclaimer: My posts are my personal opinion. I do not speak on behalf of anybody else unless I say so. If you are looking for hidden meanings in my posts, you are wasting your time...
leatherebel
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 873

Facts are the enemy of truth.


« Reply #23 on: November 07, 2007, 08:57:00 PM »

Yeah, release the B-sides of Libertad and when it doesn't go so well, blame it on the first single chosen again.... ok

Or hire Desmond Child to write some of the songs on the next album.... confused

Logged

"Asking Axl Rose what he thinks about critics is like asking a lamp post how it feels about dogs."
metallex78
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3281


vicarious existance is a fucking waste of time


« Reply #24 on: November 08, 2007, 03:31:42 AM »

I haven't listened to Libertad since I bought it, I'd much rather Slash went back to his solo thing so we can hear some good guitar riffing and soloing, rather than have him play watered-down STP sounding stuff like what's on Libertad.

I half agree.? Contraband was a good record, and if they went back to playing that sort of thing, I'd be satisfied.? I think that album is better than Slash's solo stuff.? But I wholeheartedly agree that Libertad was much too tame, much too STP sounding for my liking.? I also can't seem to muster up the desire to play Libertad over and over.

Yeah, and what I said isn't a dig at STP either. I love STP, but Slash on Libertad just sounds so uninspired on most of it.
At least on Contraband the guitars jumped out of the speakers and kicked you in the face, even if the mix was bad.
Logged

Guns N' Fuckin Roses - Aussie Tour 2007!!!
23 June Sydney @ Acer Arena
24 June Sydney @ Acer Arena

Guns N' Fuckin Roses - Aussie Tour 2013!!!
17 March Melbourne @ Sidney Myer Music Bowl
Eclipsed107
VIP
****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 701


Fucked over in Philly - 12/06/02


« Reply #25 on: November 09, 2007, 09:57:38 PM »

Quote
The lack of solos on Contraband was because Slash felt restricted. He wanted to save money and ended up recording guitars in some small studio where he didn't feel comfortable (according to his book).

Then Libertad was done with Brendan and everybody seemed happy because the band had played together longer.

So if Libertad was the best they can do, why would the next album be that different?


Rick Rubin wanted them to write more songs, they didn't want that. They wanted to record the stuff they had.

Considering 2009 is about 14 months away and they have some tours to finish, it doesn't seem like they'll have much time to work on an album if they wanna get it out in early 2009.

First off Slash said that there weren't as many solos as there could have been on Contraband because he felt restricted in the studio and wasn't as comfortable playing.  Saying "the lack" makes it sound like there's hardly any, which isn't true.  He also said he was happy with his work on Contraband.

Also your quote about Libertad being the best they can do is pure nonsense.  Show me one quote where anyone ever said Libertad is the best they can do.  I'm sure you'll have a ton of trouble finding one.  They said they wanted to make the best album they ever made, and they also said that they were happy with the way it came out. 

Also, they have plenty of time to get working on a new album if they want it out by "early 2009".  Early 2009 would be anytime before April (splitting the year into four quarters), which is 17 months away.   If you think that it'll take Velvet Revolver 17 months to do some touring, write a new record and put it out you're insane.  If they wanted too they could have it out sometime in 2008, but the band probably doesn't want to commit to that constant of a work schedule.
Logged

If I said you had a beautiful body, would you take your pants off and dance around a little?
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.042 seconds with 20 queries.