Axl Rose and Paul Mc Cartney

[MJRoses23]

Axl Rose is more talented than Pauk,and more himself!!1
Ok paul is bigger name in the world of music than axl,but axl is more talented,and
AXL Rose isn't ser

I love Axl and all but I can admit when people are better than him, and not too many are, but Paul??? Come on now.? This is my view on the Beatles, It's like Michael Jordan in basketball, you can hate the guy or whatever, but how can you not admit he is the greatest of all time???

Gotta agree about the MJ thing.  Thats partly what my sn is about..but i dont have the beatles as the other part of my sn i got guns so im gonna have to take Axl over paul.  However i will never deny how big the Beatles were or what they did for music.  I dont know enough about them to say antyhing about their talent. 

[MJRoses23]

Axl Rose is more talented than Pauk,and more himself!!1
Ok paul is bigger name in the world of music than axl,but axl is more talented,and
AXL Rose isn't ser

 
talk about ball washing.....

Axl more talented that Paul?

Take look at who wrote the most #1 songs, who has the most #1 albums, and who's band is ALWAYS ranked #1.
I love Axl, but Jesus let's not get carried away here?

Not to disagree with you but the amount of #1 songs has little to do with talent.  The backstreet boys, britney spears, and a whole slew of other undertalented performers have more #1s than Guns but that hardly means there more talented. 

[Kujo]

Paul was great with the Beatles but in my opinion his work post-Beatles kind of blew. Lennon was the only one who put out a solo catalogue worth a damn. Axl was great with the early GnR stuff and by all early indications he appears to be on the same track 20 years later. I have no problem that saying for me Axl is better than Paul, but I cant put GnR infront of The Beatles as a band.

[Carlos_f_Rose]

Besides why to compare Axl with Paul?  its easy, but if you compare him with Lennon, its a big trouble...

[Annie]

Besides why to compare Axl with Paul?? its easy, but if you compare him with Lennon, its a big trouble...

Because Paul was the cutest Beatle!

[JDA]

I love Axl but he isn't in Paul's league yet.  This is not an insult.  I think there are probably only a hand full of musicians that are in that league.  Doesn't mean he can't get there one day but he's not there now.

[michaelvincent]

Axl is better than Paul? That's about one of the stupidest things I've ever heard on this board.

Paul's contribution to music (as well as the rest of the Beatles) is not only in songwriting but also in innovation. The Beatles did things in the context of 'rock and roll' that were new, exciting and innovative the forwarded the genre light years. Everything from strings to indian influences, new technology (ie: the moog that is all over Abbey Road), 20th century composition (Revolution 9, the circus section of Mr. Kite), innovative recording techniques....I could go on forever. Rock music wouldn't be anywhere near where it is now had it not been for theses things.

Once Axl does something to truly innovate rock then no dice.

[johnnythunders24]

i hate wings...at least compare axl to lennon or harrisons solo stuff

[BD888]

What an embarassing thread.

[Buddha_Master]

Always happy to see Beatles fans. I think its obviously right on the dude who said Axl has better showmanship then Paul. Paul is still a great singer at his mid 60s. We will see if Axl's voice holds up as well as Pauls has. Pauls concerts o this day kick a lot of ass too. I saw his final show from this past tour and when he did Helter Skelter...my god that was ownage embodied. He handed everyone there ass.

I love Paul and I love Axl. But to those who talk shit about Paul can suck it. Really...suck a dick.