Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 30, 2024, 03:06:30 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228138 Posts in 43262 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Off Topic
| |-+  The Jungle
| | |-+  Judge delivers fast smackdown to RIAA on P2P counterclaim
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Judge delivers fast smackdown to RIAA on P2P counterclaim  (Read 2490 times)
fuckin crazy
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2270


Social Democracy Now!!!


« on: May 09, 2008, 08:11:45 PM »

Judge delivers fast smackdown to RIAA on P2P counterclaim

By Eric Bangeman | Published: May 08, 2008 - 04:00AM CT

A federal judge in Florida has made short work of a 30-page motion by the RIAA to dismiss a P2P defendant's counterclaims. The action comes in Atlantic v. Boyer, a Florida woman accused of copyright infringement by the RIAA earlier this year.
Related Stories

As has become typical in contested file-sharing cases, Eva Boyer has submitted a list of counterclaims along with her answer to the copyright infringement charges. Boyer accuses the RIAA of computer fraud and abuse, abuse of process, deceptive and unfair trade practices, and civil conspiracy—in short, claims similar to those made by Tanya Andersen, who is now pursuing a malicious prosecution lawsuit against the record labels.

The RIAA customarily moves to dismiss the counterclaims, with mixed results. In Atlantic v. Boyer, the judge's rejection of the RIAA's motion came stunningly fast. It was filed on May 5, and Judge Richard A. Lazzara dismissed it in a brief, two-page order. Judge Lazzara notes that Boyer's counterclaims were nearly identical to those in another Florida case involving the same two sets of attorneys, UMG v. Del Cid, and that the court allowed the counterclaims to stand.

In its motion to dismiss the Boyer's counterclaims, the RIAA argued that they were "heavy on hyperbole" and that the judge's decision in UMG v. Del Cid was incorrect. The labels also said that her computer fraud and abuse claim was improperly filed.

With the counterclaims upheld, the RIAA appears to be in for a bit of a tussle in this case. It's impossible to predict whether this case will head to trial, if Boyer will settle, or if the RIAA will ultimately drop the case. One thing is certain: Judge Lazzara seems disinclined to green light the RIAA's customary legal maneuvers, making the group's customary steamrolling of the legal process a bit more difficult.

Wherever the case ends up, it won't be handled by the same man who argued the RIAA's case in the Jammie Thomas trial. The record industry's lead counsel, Richard Gabriel, will be leaving private practice for an appointment to the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Link HERE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




It is a start against this thuggish organization.
Logged

i got lit last night, and I got lit the night before ... I'm drinkin' heavily and I will git lit some more
Axl4Prez2004
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4387


2007 AND 2011 HTGTH Fantasy Football Champ!


« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2008, 10:49:53 PM »

call me crazy, but I kind of agree with RIAA on this issue.  if I had talent, I sure wouldn't want my product devalued.
just sayin'.
Logged

7-14-16  Philadelphia, PA
5-13-14  Bethlehem, PA
2-24-12  Atlantic City, NJ
11-26-11  Camden, NJ
11-5-06   Meadowlands, NJ
5-12-06   Hammerstein, NY, NY
12-2-02   Boston, MA
7-25-92   Buffalo,
freedom78
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1688



WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2008, 12:54:00 AM »

call me crazy, but I kind of agree with RIAA on this issue.  if I had talent, I sure wouldn't want my product devalued.
just sayin'.

Fascist.  hihi

In all seriousness, this is what happens when you put out a shitty product and stores have the policy that you cannot return an item that has been opened. 

I personally believe that you have a right to know exactly what you are buying.  But there is often no legal way to do that with music.  Artists/labels need to do more to be consumer friendly.  How many times have you bought an album based on a song or two and it turns out to be complete crap?  Many times for me!  But not anymore.  I insist on hearing an album in full.  If I like it, I buy it.  If not, I delete it.  Simple as that. 

AND, downloading has actually led me to buy MORE music than I did before!  Artists/genres that aren't common on the airwaves never got any attention from me, but now I look much deeper and buy more because of it.
Logged

SEXUAL CHOCOLATE!
mrlee
I'm Your Sun King, Baby
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6677



« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2008, 05:30:05 AM »

totally agree and stand by freedom78's argument on the matter.

I feel the same way
Logged

html sucks
Genesis
The Reincarnation of Morpheus
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4104


Aieeeee!


« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2008, 05:43:08 AM »

The RIAA and MPAA suck ass. Luckily, only Americans have to deal with them. Grin
Logged

Fuck 'Em All.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.036 seconds with 19 queries.