Ancient Egypt

[stolat]

I would be very skeptical unless something has been published in a peer review journal

Well, peer medical reviews have published about " parental alienation" when they never researched wether the guy that talked about it was serious or not.
Turns out he is a convincted pedophile who had natural reasons to want his own child back and who invented a medical reason to brand within courts of justice.
The actual medical state of parental alienation was never proven medically, and yet, it was published everywhere.

What i'm getting at is that peer reviews are nothing but another magazine, in which you will find utter truths and utter bollocks.

And seeing the discovery channel are pretty serious, i wouldn't disclose it myself.

Hey Jesssica - I started this thread to have 'intellectual discussions' about the wonders of ancient Egypt. Feel free to start your very own thread dedicated to pedophiles elsewhere.

[Jessica]

No stolat, i am talking peer reviews, i was just illustrating the remark on egypt with one that was inside a medical peer review and that was utter bollocks..

As if truths always had to come out of peer reviews...

Plus, the plateau site used to have aforum full of proper well known if not extremely famous archeologists and it was available to everyone then.

The " i don't believe infos unless they come from there" kind of annoyed me a little bit.

I wasn't thread napping stolat.

[stolat]

Now UFOs really should have a thread of their own!

[fuckin crazy]

I would be very skeptical unless something has been published in a peer review journal

Well, peer medical reviews have published about " parental alienation" when they never researched wether the guy that talked about it was serious or not.
Turns out he is a convincted pedophile who had natural reasons to want his own child back and who invented a medical reason to brand within courts of justice.
The actual medical state of parental alienation was never proven medically, and yet, it was published everywhere.

What i'm getting at is that peer reviews are nothing but another magazine, in which you will find utter truths and utter bollocks.

And seeing the discovery channel are pretty serious, i wouldn't disclose it myself.

Peer Review is the ONLY CREDIBLE source for scientific information , otherwise one ends up with a bunch of stupid shit theories to explain things that could be explained rationally w/o resorting to myth and an absence of logic. (I.E: astrology , UFO abductions , ID , Homeopathy , ect. , ect. , ect.)

[fuckin crazy]

Flaws in the peer review process are discovered relatively quickly , hence your example ; they are however very rare .

[fuckin crazy]

I would be very skeptical unless something has been published in a peer review journal

ask Elmo

Yes , a great , and well respected teacher of the truth .