Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 30, 2024, 01:23:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228530 Posts in 43274 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Dead Horse
| | |-+  New Band
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: New Band  (Read 2201 times)
GNVR
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 71


Here Today...


« on: June 19, 2006, 07:44:57 AM »

Don't worry, this is not a new band vs. old band thread.

What I'd like to know is, who here thinks that the new band really represents Guns N' Roses?? What I mean by that is: Do all the new members have the style, stage present, attitude and look needed to be in GNR?? Axl Rose decided to rebuild this band and get a fresh start.? In 2002, they were referred to as a circus emsemble (or whatever the term) and people mocked them non stop (especially BH).? Today, they all pretty much have the same rockstar look as Axl does, and to me, feel and look more and more like a real band rather than a cast of hired guns like in 2002.? My question is:? Which new members truly fits the embodiment of the new GNR?? In? MY opinion, Tommy Stintson, Richard Fortus, Dizzy Reed and Ron Thal all have IT.? Robin Finck (even with the new look), Brain and Chris Pittman do not look the part.? Any thoughts?
« Last Edit: June 19, 2006, 07:48:21 AM by GNVR » Logged
Tomorrows
VIP
****

Karma: -6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1384


Stick to your guns


« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2006, 07:47:34 AM »

Bullshit, this is the very essence of a new band v. old band thread.
Logged
anythinggoes
Guest
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2006, 07:48:05 AM »

and what are you comparing the look of nugnr too exactly the way they look is what nugnr looks like any comparrison turns this into a OLD vs New thread
Logged
GNVR
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 71


Here Today...


« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2006, 08:02:42 AM »

Compare GNR in 2001-2002 to today.? Back then, it was Axl Rose and the replacement.? In my opinion, it was hard to support them cause it didn't feel real.? Players like BH, Paul Toabias and others didn't fit.? It was a hired cast except Tommy.  I've always felt like he was perfect in GNR.  Today, I look at what Axl's done and I think that he's succeeded in rebuilding this band.? These guys really gel and are exciting to watch.? Again, I'm not talking about the old band here...
« Last Edit: June 19, 2006, 08:05:29 AM by GNVR » Logged
slashisvr
D.T.U.D.
VIP
****

Karma: -4
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1231


A Rock N' Roll bash where everybody's smashed


« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2006, 12:16:16 PM »

now is the first time GnR look like a band sine 92, even at some shows there they didnt look like a band
Logged

Hammersmith - london 7th june G N' F' R
NEC - Birmingham 25th july G N' F' R
monkeychow
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 580


How's that for provocation?


WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2006, 04:54:17 AM »

Don't worry, this is not a new band vs. old band thread.

What I'd like to know is, who here thinks that the new band really represents Guns N' Roses?  What I mean by that is: Do all the new members have the style, stage present, attitude and look needed to be in GNR?  Axl Rose decided to rebuild this band and get a fresh start.  In 2002, they were referred to as a circus emsemble (or whatever the term) and people mocked them non stop (especially BH).  Today, they all pretty much have the same rockstar look as Axl does, and to me, feel and look more and more like a real band rather than a cast of hired guns like in 2002.  My question is:  Which new members truly fits the embodiment of the new GNR?  In  MY opinion, Tommy Stintson, Richard Fortus, Dizzy Reed and Ron Thal all have IT.  Robin Finck (even with the new look), Brain and Chris Pittman do not look the part.  Any thoughts?

I disagree...I think Fink looks spot on now.

His 02 goth look just didn't suit the rest of the band. I mean it should be about the music not looks anyway...but if we're going on looks then 2006 is major improvement on 2002.

I think the new band looks ok as a band together now. Although i've never seen the need for 3 guitars really, it doesn't seem like theres that many places where a 3rd guitar part adds a lot to the songs.

Logged
oldgunsfan
Legend
*****

Karma: -4
Offline Offline

Posts: 2264

Here Today...


« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2006, 09:13:07 PM »

and what are you comparing the look of nugnr too exactly the way they look is what nugnr looks like any comparrison turns this into a OLD vs New thread

v2002 vs v2006 (sounds like a Version of Windows Software hihi)

v2006 looks much more like a rock band, v2002 lookd like a circus freakshow Embarrassed
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.036 seconds with 18 queries.