Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 26, 2024, 08:49:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228781 Posts in 43283 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Dead Horse
| | |-+  Axl Rose: 2002 vs. 2006
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: Axl Rose: 2002 vs. 2006  (Read 6578 times)
bazgnr
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2215


« Reply #20 on: June 06, 2006, 10:07:46 PM »

Axl wasnt fat fat in 2001/2002 but he was definately bulkier than we have ever seen him. Which isnt that big a deal because he was skinny as back in the day and hes trim now.

But he looked about 100x fatter because of what he wore. Now it looks like he is taking his fashion advice from someone other than Chris Pittman and we are the better for it.

That's funny stuff.  When I saw them at the Hammerstein, I loved the fact that they "looked" the part of a bad-ass rock band once again (*so* glad Robin dropped the Goth / shaved head /etc. look), but Pitman looked a bit...dated and silly.

A question for those who saw the '02 tour...how do they compare to now in terms of performance, stamina, chemistry, etc.?  I loved what I saw in NYC, but have no real point of reference, as the last GnR show I saw prior to that was in '92...
Logged
Tomorrows
VIP
****

Karma: -6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1384


Stick to your guns


« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2006, 10:45:24 PM »

Axl wasnt fat fat in 2001/2002 but he was definately bulkier than we have ever seen him. Which isnt that big a deal because he was skinny as back in the day and hes trim now.

But he looked about 100x fatter because of what he wore. Now it looks like he is taking his fashion advice from someone other than Chris Pittman and we are the better for it.

That's funny stuff.  When I saw them at the Hammerstein, I loved the fact that they "looked" the part of a bad-ass rock band once again (*so* glad Robin dropped the Goth / shaved head /etc. look), but Pitman looked a bit...dated and silly.

A question for those who saw the '02 tour...how do they compare to now in terms of performance, stamina, chemistry, etc.?  I loved what I saw in NYC, but have no real point of reference, as the last GnR show I saw prior to that was in '92...

I quite liked Robin's image in RiR3 - I thought he looked really cool. Except other times on the 2002 tour he looked like shit. Especially in Boston when he wore that white jumpsuit thing with that ascot tie!

The band were just everywhere with their image then though. At least there is a shared theme going on with all their dress now.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 18 queries.