I agree the image of a student standing in front of a tank at Tiananmen Square has great symbolic meaning of the fight for democracy since many students lost their lives in that protest. The image no longer represents a Chinese student defying a tank. Instead, it represents the ongoing struggle for democracy and this meaning is universal, even though it was created in a different culture, time and place. It has the power to evoke similar responses across all cultures and all viewers. However, this CD cover is not the proper conduit nor Axl the right spokesperson. How much political and cultural factors is Axl really incorporating into his work? Is Axl ready to associate with a revolutionary movement? Is he creating an urgency for change? I doubt it. The choice of communication channel transmits meaning beyond the message content. Where else do you envision this image in terms of campaingability? On T-shirts?, bandanas?, keychains?, tour programs? How about a wall clock or zippo lighter? In doing so you trivialize it, taking over others' meanings to one's own ends. Cultural appropriation is the process of "borrowing" and changing the meaning of commodities, cultural products, slogans, images, or elements of fashion. The GN'R brand is not a good lens to understand the Tiananmen Square massacre because it betrays the
truthfulness of representation.jameslofton29, your intentions are
sincere, but this image, or related graphic image, should not be used to promote album sales to a popular audience.
As an aside, the record companies didn't really start to get so involved with cover art until Prince's original Controversy cover and bold musical statements got so much mainstream attention. Before that, things were much more interesting. Today, mass marketization of music has led to a sameness/blandness without distinguishing qualities, and the rules governing cover art are more rigidly enforced. Guns N' Roses rely on controversy and attention grabbing antics; I hope they do stir things up with imagination to represent the band.
"Personally, I like the "red" artistic picture. I "see" a lot of layers in that picture that could be interpreted (consciously, sub-consciously, or un-consciously) in many, many ways. For example, the US flag going down in flames, in the upper right-hand corner an "image" that could be interpreted as christ-like, etc...
Careful now, to
"see" is a nature process of observing and identification to the world around us. Seeing is something we do everyday in our daily lives.
Looking is an activity that involves a greater sense of purpose and direction. To look is an act of choice.
Meaning happens in the act of interpretation and you have negotiated an interpretation from the image. As your negotiation is a kind of bargaining over meanings, I disagree and view this work and explanation as imprecise. I still maintain the oppositional reading of too many PhotoShop filters without any real concept.
Plus, the overall image, to me anyways, seems to convey upheaval, war, destruction, those kinds of things. I like it!"
Is this the desired response? Axl's new worldview suggests healthful intentions. The overreaching arch of these next album(s) is about building something positive. We saw glimpses of this in SCOM which searches for the root of innocence, and I expect more growth and development in this direction.
But, many of us uncouth, ruffian(ly) GnR fans might not be sophisticated enough to think on that level, no matter the psychological impact that type of picture MIGHT carry. Plus, I'm not sure if that particular picture is 'universal' enough to carry such a message (to a wider audience).
Rather like being multilingual, the ability to "read" the
visual landscape is of
primary importance. You must develop a critical awareness. Ask yourself: what are the central aspects of commodity culture and consumer societies?
Images.
Images are
central to the construction of cultural ideas about lifestyle, self-image, self-improvement, and glamour. This is not to be pretentious; you have to have the prerequisite information to understand the signs you are presented with.
Of course, I cannot offer an objective analysis on the
actual cover until I properly view it. My understanding is that it is a b+w photograph Axl received, so I assume it is not contrived or manipulated, but raw and untouched using existing lighting. Found photography.
and so it was said...
amen (*cough*)