Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 20, 2024, 07:01:17 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228473 Posts in 43274 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Guns N' Roses
| | |-+  Stinson talks to LA Times
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: Stinson talks to LA Times  (Read 12392 times)
Mikkamakka
Daddy Cool
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2242


Half man, half beast


« Reply #60 on: March 04, 2005, 02:42:14 PM »

Agree with Jarmo!
It is rather we that owe`s Axl, and GNR!!

I'd like to pay for him some money but he has to release CD to get my donation  Wink
Logged

'Once there was this Rock 'N' Roll band
Rollin' on the streets
Time went by and it became a joke'
Booker Floyd
Groupie
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2309



« Reply #61 on: March 04, 2005, 03:48:20 PM »

Yeah, by that logic work on the Use Your Illusion albums started in the early to mid-80s. Before GN'R even existed.

No.

When Axl was working on "Dont Cry," "November Rain," and "Back Off Bitch," it wasnt for the Appetite For Destruction follow-up.? Any material written after UYI was written for a follow-up to that album.? Thats the difference.? Do you really question that any material worked on after 1993 wasnt meant for the next GNR record?

And do you believe that work on the album ceased in 2002?

Quote
Would you say it took GN'R six or seven years to finish UYI? Some of the material is that old.....

I think youve missed my point.

Im not going by how old a song is, Im going by how much time material has been worked on for an album, between abums.? Therefore, Use Your Illusions would have been worked on for about 3 years.

I'm sure they have worked on songs before 1998, but Tommy wasn't even in the band before 1998. I think once they got a band together, after all the members leaving, things got a bit more serious.

Probably...that doesnt mean the album wasnt being worked on prior to that.



« Last Edit: March 04, 2005, 03:59:00 PM by Booker Floyd » Logged
jarmo
If you're reading this, you've just wasted valuable time!
Administrator
Legend
*****

Karma: 9
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 38913


"You're an idiot"


WWW
« Reply #62 on: March 04, 2005, 04:47:19 PM »

So you think if they wrote "dozens of tracks" that those are all for the follow up album?

I believe artists can write songs just because they have something to say. Not because they have to write songs for a follow-up album. Then maybe after completing a bunch of songs he/she can decided that "ok, these 15 could be on the new album".

To me it seems like Axl would write songs, and then later decide which ones would be worked on further for a possible inclusion on an album.



/jarmo
Logged

Disclaimer: My posts are my personal opinion. I do not speak on behalf of anybody else unless I say so. If you are looking for hidden meanings in my posts, you are wasting your time...
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 18 queries.