errr.. sorry Your name just looked a little bit feminine, like Phoebe or something. why did you point out
unlike real love and
until the object of your affection tells you to either FUCK OFF or actually decides to love you backreal love is the simbiotic relationship I explained later on. and I see nothing wrong with "
until the object of your affection tells you to either FUCK OFF or actually decides to love you back"
Again, I did not misused my words. Maybe you ran a google search on platonic love and the "no sex" thing came up, well it's a little more than than. Read what Eva wrote. She got it. Don't blame your lack of comprehension on me.?
Then you are mixed up. Firstly I never said platonic love can't exist in sexual relationship.
Also comprehension wise, You're wrong again. I said I was not discussing your point.
without giving a boring lecture on Plato and Socrates, I just tell you how it's a little more than that.
1) platonic love doesn't oppose to real love. It's real love in the metaphysical way.? e.g. True friendship is a kind of platonic love.
2) platonic love doesn't mean one-sided love at all.
Funny the term is related to "The School of Athens". And it was around the release of Illusion twins when Axl talked his attaching greater weight to the friendship with his the then girlfriend than the romance in an interview.?
OK, now I understand why we are not in the same page.
For ME platonic love is indeed opposed to real love because real love depends in sex.
and that is why we are not understanding eachother. Because we have a different perception of what true love is. Or at least that's why you are not understanding me or my use of words.
But I've grown tired of this conversation.
Over and out.
Author