of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
October 31, 2024, 09:30:53 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
1228659
Posts in
43279
Topics by
9264
Members
Latest Member:
EllaGNR
Here Today... Gone To Hell!
Off Topic
Bad Obsession
50 Year Copyright Law
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: 50 Year Copyright Law (Read 3607 times)
Chris Misfit
Guest
50 Year Copyright Law
«
on:
October 08, 2004, 12:21:58 AM »
Well, the major companies are getting shaky, as the Beatles, Elvis records are nearing public domain ownership.
They have applied for a 95 year ownership law, so they can reap the benefits of 1000 more compilation albums.
Obviously, these companies have promoted, and released the artists music(or in most cases, bought the rights), but after 50 years, should they still have the right to keep 95% of these artists earnings? Should it become public domain? Or should the rights be passed on to the decendants of the artists? I mean after 50 years of drawing 95% of the profits, don't you think they've had enough?
The problem with becoming public domain is every fucker out there is going to barage us with covers, not that the record companys don't already do this, but just think what would happen if just anyone could release Beatles music without even asking.
The problem with record companys owning the music, is that they're greedy fuckers. No contract that was signed, in a time very different to now half a century ago, can possibly be reinvoked. Seriously. The Beatles spoke out many times, about not being paid. They've made their money, surely the time has come for the families of the artists to gain financial wealth for what their loved ones did, those years ago.
The way I see it, the record companies are their to promote a service, and they've been fully paid for that. I really hope the familys gain the rights, but the record companys will have lawyers, and money to win their case, and power and wealth always win.
Discuss...
Logged
Izzy
Whine, moan, complain... Repeat
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8688
More than meets the eye
Re: 50 Year Copyright Law
«
Reply #1 on:
October 08, 2004, 05:14:04 AM »
Lol - in 30 years time when GNR's copyright expires we will have Welcome to the jungle on every advert u can imagine - horrifying thought
Logged
Quick! To the bandwagon!
Walk
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 1526
I'm a llama!
Re: 50 Year Copyright Law
«
Reply #2 on:
October 09, 2004, 04:03:12 AM »
If it still sells, then copyright should still apply. Money from old Beatles records can be used to sign new bands with actual talent.
The Beatles are one band where a Greatest Hits collection puts almost all of their good songs on a single cd. Most of their early albums, and of course the White Album, were loaded with filler songs. Same goes with Elvis. So many new, fresh bands with new ideas need signing. Let the old guys buy their Beatles so we can get us some new rock!
Logged
axls_locomotive
Guest
Re: 50 Year Copyright Law
«
Reply #3 on:
October 11, 2004, 05:05:18 PM »
Quote from: Chris Misfit on October 08, 2004, 12:21:58 AM
Elvis records are nearing public domain ownership.
Discuss...
just to let you know that elvis songs pre 1973 are all owned by numerous dodgy companies and not the elvis estate..thats why there has been so many compilation albums...in some ways im actually keen to see them go into public ownership because im tired of all these companies taking advantage and selling so many albums...but on the other hand there are plenty of companies who would love the chance to get at these songs and use them in their adverts...i certainly dont think there should be any more than a 50 year copyright on any song...although the music industry has help within governments so they will probably get their way
Logged
AdZ
It's LiberAdZe, bitch!
HTGTH Crew
Legend
Karma: 3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5336
Re: 50 Year Copyright Law
«
Reply #4 on:
October 11, 2004, 06:22:57 PM »
I've always been of the belief that
the artist
should hold an infinite copyright over the song.
Logged
MadmanDan
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1517
When yu're talkin' to yourself,and nobody's home...
Re: 50 Year Copyright Law
«
Reply #5 on:
October 12, 2004, 04:15:48 PM »
Quote from: AdZ on October 11, 2004, 06:22:57 PM
I've always been of the belief that
the artist
should hold an infinite copyright over the song.
Yeah,the artists are fucked by the record companies all theur careers.Maybe after 50 years they or their families should get full rights to their work. Then again,50 years is a loooong time to get fucked...
Logged
"There's only one Return, and it ain't of the king, it's of the Jedi !"
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Guns N' Roses
-----------------------------
=> Guns N' Roses
=> GNN - GN'R News Network
=> Dead Horse
=> GN'R On Tour!
===> 2020 - 2022 Tours
===> Not In This Lifetime 2016-2019
===> World Tour 2009-14
===> Past tours
===> Europe 2006
===> North America 2006
===> World Tour 2007
-----------------------------
The Perils Of Rock N' Roll Decadence
-----------------------------
=> Solo & side projects + Ex-members
===> Duff, Slash & Velvet Revolver
=====> Spectacle - VR on tour
-----------------------------
Wake up, it's time to play!
-----------------------------
=> Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll
=> Appetite For Collection
=> BUY Product
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Jungle
=> Bad Obsession
=> Fun N' Games
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Administrative, Feedback & Help
Loading...