Title: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Princess Leia on November 30, 2013, 12:40:13 PM I found it on paradisecity.com
It doesn?t sound good. I mean he is not a happy camper. That?s what it seems http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/bumblefoot-if-i-have-to-choose-between-guns-n-roses-and-the-rest-of-my-life-im-out/ Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: sofine11 on November 30, 2013, 03:48:17 PM Shit. Yeah, he's definitely not happy at all.
And he's right. It's way shitty of them to have him cancel/reschedule his tour for plans that don't even come to fruition. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: GnR-NOW on November 30, 2013, 04:28:57 PM What's GNR without a little tension?!
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: draguns on November 30, 2013, 04:45:43 PM This came up on my FB feed since I have "Ultimate Classic Rock" magazine as a like. This isn't surprising at all. If GNR loses Bumblefoot, it's a major blow to the band. Axl needs to get things going with a new album otherwise he'll be facing more issues with otter members of the band.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on November 30, 2013, 05:03:51 PM This came up on my FB feed since I have "Ultimate Classic Rock" magazine as a like. This isn't surprising at all. If GNR loses Bumblefoot, it's a major blow to the band. Axl needs to get things going with a new album otherwise he'll be facing more issues with otter members of the band. It doesn't sound like this is a new album issue. This sounds like a communication and alignment issue within the GN'R camp. Regardless, I'll never understand why Ron chooses to air his grievances publicly like he does. I have no doubts that there have been issues with the band and its management before, yet Ron seems to be the only one that we hear about because he deals with this publicly. I also don't understand how it is that GN'R were able to accomodate Richard's prior commitments to the Dead Daisies, yet working out something with Ron is apparently an issue. Strange, but I'm sure things will work out one way or another. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on November 30, 2013, 05:04:46 PM I mean I dont see why he would quit now...its always the same thing with these guys
but id be mighty pissed off too if they made him cancel dates for no apparent reason.... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: damnthehaters on November 30, 2013, 05:07:55 PM A few people on this board should respond to Bumble like they do to those of us who question, complain, or suggest...."GNR aren't like other bands, if you don't like it, get out!" .. ::) Or they will come up with some excuse about how it's difficult because of the record company.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: GNR2014 on November 30, 2013, 05:25:17 PM I don't claim to know what goes on behind the scenes, but my take on it is that Ron knows the media love to pounce on any stories that paint Axl in a negative light.
Ron obviously craves e attention. He is rusting away in GN'R, and he wants to remain in the spotlight. He is promoting a new project, BlowoutNYC, and putting a negative spin on Axl Rose/ Guns N' Roses makes anything he says newsworthy. I don't know if Axl minds or not, maybe he's cool with it. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on November 30, 2013, 06:36:11 PM Didn't he have to cancel solo shows when he joined GN'R? So, what's new?
/jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JeffK on November 30, 2013, 06:41:04 PM He also said in a recent interview that he kind of feels like an outsider in the band and doesn't get asked to hang out and do stuff by the other band members. Made it seem like all of the other members hang out together and don't include him. I hate to say this because I love Ron but it seems like he's been doing a lot of whining lately. It would suck if he ended up leaving the band but I'm sure Dj and Richard could handle everything just fine. It seems like Dj is really the only one excited to be in GNR. Ron seems to be more into his solo stuff, Richard seems to like to bounce around from band to band and play with as many musicians as possible, Tommy has seemed unhappy for quite a while. In richard's case it helps that he's really good friends with Dizzy and Frank...so I don't think he'll go anywhere. But I think the reason I like Dj so much is because he's 100% GNR...he has sixx am which is a bigger side project than any other member has, a clothing company, media company that has a contract with all of the cirque de soleil shows in vegas, he produces other bands and singers but he's still all about Guns N' Roses! It seems like Dj loves being in GNR and for everyone else it's just a job.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: sofine11 on November 30, 2013, 06:59:31 PM Didn't he have to cancel solo shows when he joined GN'R? So, what's new? /jarmo Difference is, those shows happened. This time around he was forced to cancel shows for plans that ended up being cancelled anyway. Who wouldn't be irritated in that scenario? Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Dr. Blutarsky on November 30, 2013, 08:28:27 PM Ron tends to vent his frustrations from time to time. It'll get worked out like it usually does, don't see him quitting this far into it.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JDA on November 30, 2013, 11:52:16 PM I wonder who the next guitar will be? Ron, I think you just got fired from the band and I think it was your goal. Robin, come back!
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Gunsguy on December 01, 2013, 01:35:47 AM Didn't he have to cancel solo shows when he joined GN'R? So, what's new? /jarmo True enough, I think the lack of communication is part of the problem as well in listening to the interview. I am sure they will, like always work it all out : ok: Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Gunsguy on December 01, 2013, 01:36:09 AM I wonder who the next guitar will be? Ron, I think you just got fired from the band and I think it was your goal. Robin, come back! no one said he was fired, relax! Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JeffK on December 01, 2013, 01:45:14 AM I wonder who the next guitar will be? Ron, I think you just got fired from the band and I think it was your goal. Robin, come back! god no! The last thing GNR needs is to bring Robin or buckethead back. I really don't think Ron's going anywhere...people get frustrated. On the tiny chance he does leave they should just use 2 guitar players. Dj and Richard could easily handle the job!Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: One.In.A.Million on December 01, 2013, 03:35:56 AM Ron maybe has had enough of the constant uncertainty with what GN'R is doing at any one time, including future plans. I am kind of expecting Ron to be the next one out, I don't think he needs or craves the celebrity status being in the band brings anymore. He's lived the dream and he has been "A Rockstar For A Day", as his song goes.
And I can't blame the guy one bit to be honest, maybe it is time for him to get off the Nightrain. Like Robin and Bucket, Ron seems to be happy to do his own thing on a smaller scale, just because it means it's "certain" and "straight forward", which is something Guns will never be. And as people have said, Ron knows that the press will jump on this like they have. And that's another cause for concern, because I don't think he cares whether he gets fired or not by the GN'R camp... it's like he's daring them to make a move, and he's seeing how far he can go in his criticisms... shame really. :-\ Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: westcoast_junkie on December 01, 2013, 04:46:40 AM Interview is interview. If Ron's dissappointed that only show he's human. I'm a bit dissapointed myself, because I wanted to catch one of them European dates. On the positive side, he think it's likely that something is happening in 2014. Let's focus on that : ok:
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 01, 2013, 12:25:14 PM danke, was an intresting listen :) Bumble is teh pwn. At rio in 06 it was basicly him and axl that stood out 4 me. What's GNR without a little tension?! whats rock w/o drama. :P it's not like rockers doesn't have it miserable. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ginger King on December 01, 2013, 12:31:57 PM So what's the consensus from this glass half full website? Normal stuff that all bands go through (sarcasm intended)? The disconnect b/t Bumble and management/the rest of the band is very disheartening.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 01, 2013, 12:36:15 PM Ron seems to be more into his solo stuff, Yeah, he is like Buckethead in that regard. The last thing GNR needs is to bring Robin or buckethead back If I ever get 2 attend a guns-show I always wanted 2 shout 'where's buckethead!' to troll back to the reunionists :hihi: seriously, I love Buckethead and that guns-era/style. Since then and atm they are doing a more classic rock-style. would be sad 2 c b-foot leave cause he plays so much 'out of the box' and has this punk-element with him musicly. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: sexkitten on December 01, 2013, 02:33:04 PM Didn't he have to cancel solo shows when he joined GN'R? So, what's new? /jarmo True enough, I think the lack of communication is part of the problem as well in listening to the interview. I am sure they will, like always work it all out : ok: I agree. I think there's def. a lack of communication and Ron is def. using the interview as a platform to communicate with the band and band management. Although, I feel sympathy towards ron's frustrations, truth of the matter is, no one would know who Ron is if it weren't for guns...as talented as he is. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: cotis on December 01, 2013, 03:27:38 PM people always read too much into stuff.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ginger King on December 01, 2013, 04:15:38 PM people always read too much into stuff. Ok so what's your take on it? Just some good old fashioned clowning around? It's not hard to see Ron's frustrated. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: cotis on December 01, 2013, 11:17:48 PM people always read too much into stuff. Ok so what's your take on it? Just some good old fashioned clowning around? It's not hard to see Ron's frustrated. I heard the interview, read the transcript, etc. I just think there's some stuff going on, as there always is, and it's part of life. Decisions come up in life for everyone. and no matter what decision is made, someone will always be pissed off. Hope it all gets sorted out soon - for Ron as well as GNR. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: spgunner on December 02, 2013, 08:23:23 AM I just wish Ron would think twice before saying things like that. The bad press and the old band fans love this kind of thing to bother/trash/judge/blame Axl and the band.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 02, 2013, 10:37:25 AM Well if he was told that he has to or should cancel his tour dates.... and then GNR doesnt tour... he loses out on that income...and then cant get an explanation or an answer about what the plan is....
doesnt he have the right to be angry? wouldnt you be angry? do you think he cares if it makes them look bad in some peoples eyes? they did wrong by him if this is true...which... sounds like it is they are all just at Axl's beckon call....and since his earning power isnt anything on his own... he has to ride it out...hes in a tough spot Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: spgunner on December 02, 2013, 11:03:52 AM We're nobody to judge what happens inside the GN'R camp - we are not there to know, you just hear from here and there and make your own little judgements. You're just supposing, guessing. Doesn't matter who's right or wrong - if he's inside the band and loves what he does inside (even if there are reasons for him to be angry at something) I don't think it's cool to go to the press to talk about it.
I have a band (a shitty garage band). I don't go talk to my family about issues in the band. I talk to the guys in the band. I work at a place. If I have issues with my boss, I don't complain to my girl. I go talk to my boss and if I'm not happy, I'll leave. Point is: doesn't matter if you see this as a band thing, as a employer / emloyee thing or whatever. It's useless to complain about it to the press. I really don't believe this kind of thing makes things better. But I do believe it makes things worse. Seems like he likes Axl. So if he does (and I do believe he does) maybe he should realize this kind of behavior ends up demaging even more Axl's image because he looks like a villain - again. If I"m in a band, I don't want people to say shit about my band even though I might not be totally happy about it. If I'm working at a place, I don't want people to say shit about the place that gives me ways to live my life, even though I might not be so happy about it. No one put a gun on Ron's head to be there. I love the guy. I hope things are ok between the band and him. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 02, 2013, 11:36:27 AM i am not supposing or guessing about anything....
Ron had scheduled solo shows didn't he? which were then cancelled because it would conflict with his employer.... these are facts no? and my point is... id be pretty pissed off too but I do understand what you are saying youd prefer to not air dirty laundry in public... but hey GNR is a public thing or whatever you want to call it...rons a public figure...he was asked a question and answered it Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: BangoSkank on December 02, 2013, 12:00:28 PM Fuck, I sense we might lose Ron soon...
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: spgunner on December 02, 2013, 12:42:03 PM i am not supposing or guessing about anything.... Ron had scheduled solo shows didn't he? which were then cancelled because it would conflict with his employer.... these are facts no? and my point is... id be pretty pissed off too but I do understand what you are saying youd prefer to not air dirty laundry in public... but hey GNR is a public thing or whatever you want to call it...rons a public figure...he was asked a question and answered it Yeah, these are facts. But that's what we know. We don't know if there's more behind the scenes. Anyway yes, I don't think it's nice for both sides (the band and Ron) to air dirty laundry in public. And above all, it's not nice to the fans. Ron has all the right in the world to do whatever he wants, but is it right to go public? I don't think any positive thing can come out from acts like this. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 01:57:07 PM Regardless, I'll never understand why Ron chooses to air his grievances publicly like he does. I have no doubts that there have been issues with the band and its management before, yet Ron seems to be the only one that we hear about because he deals with this publicly. Perhaps he really hates to do this on stage...but he's tried every other fucking way. You know, to coin a phrase. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 01:58:54 PM Well if he was told that he has to or should cancel his tour dates.... and then GNR doesnt tour... he loses out on that income...and then cant get an explanation or an answer about what the plan is.... doesnt he have the right to be angry? wouldnt you be angry? do you think he cares if it makes them look bad in some peoples eyes? they did wrong by him if this is true...which... sounds like it is they are all just at Axl's beckon call....and since his earning power isnt anything on his own... he has to ride it out...hes in a tough spot I don't think the issue is whether or not he has a right to be angry or whether or not we wouldn't be angry. I think the issue is the same as when Ron vented on Twitter about the scheduling of the additional private show towards the tail end of the 2012 Euro tour. It's about HOW he handles the anger. I don't see what there is to gain by airing dirty laundry in public. If he has a problem with something or someone, he should deal with it with that someone or that group of people. Venting publicly doesn't bring a solution to the problem any closer to fruition. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 02:01:31 PM Regardless, I'll never understand why Ron chooses to air his grievances publicly like he does. I have no doubts that there have been issues with the band and its management before, yet Ron seems to be the only one that we hear about because he deals with this publicly. Perhaps he really hates to do this on stage...but he's tried every other fucking way. You know, to coin a phrase. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 02:11:43 PM The one you mentioned about complaining about the private show was out of line. I'm sure they were well compensated for that.
As for general frustration with this dysfunctional operation, I sure don't blame him. He can't get an answer from his own band in weeks? That's unacceptable. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 02:19:27 PM The one you mentioned about complaining about the private show was out of line. I'm sure they were well compensated for that. Don't get me wrong, if there is a plan for the upcoming year, and it has not been communicated to BBF, that is not acceptable. I'm not questioning that.As for general frustration with this dysfunctional operation, I sure don't blame him. He can't get an answer from his own band in weeks? That's unacceptable. As I stated earlier, I'm not questioning his frustration or right to be frustrated, either. What I'm questioning is the public manner in which he chooses to express his frustration. I'm also questioning the theory I've read, that you mentioned, that he did this because he had no other alternative to get management's attention. That theory is based upon the premise that he did this out of necessity as demanded by the particular situation. My position is that given that he has done this before and there has been fallout from it (let's not forget the "fuck Axl's band" comment that lead to the utter disaster of a chat session on MyGNR), that this was not done deliberately as demanded by the situation. This was done out of habit. It's a pattern. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: IKnowWhereIAM on December 02, 2013, 02:21:48 PM I can only imagine the frustration he feels. Fans often do not think of the sacrifice Ron has made for this band already - putting his health on the line by touring immediately following a serious and painful injury. He rescheduled and cancelled personal commitments, to meet his GnR commitment - with a loss of personal income and 'honor'. Failure of any employer to recognize/reward that type of commitment can result in a damaged relationship. He wants to make GnR music - but it just isn't happening as he expected/wants. It is unfortunate that he is airing this publicly, but we foamers are always digging for more info, aren't we? Now there is unhappiness about the info we have received.
Relax and enjoy the ride. GnR is what it is. Axl is what he is. I hope we get new music some day, and I hope Ron is a part of it (not in the former member Buckethead sense). Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: LongGoneDay on December 02, 2013, 02:59:56 PM I would generally subscribe to the theory it's best not to air dirty laundry in public. Maybe this is a last ditch effort on his part.
I don't know where the problem lies, but the fact of the matter is, this band falls far short of productive, and Thai has expressed frustration with it before. Seems he's reached his boiling point. Who could blame him? He's an artist who's job is to create. It's bad enough GN'R can't manage to create new music of it's own, but on top of it they are holding him back from his side projects. He knows what the public perception of GN'R today is, and seems to genuinely want to be a part of the solution, but it comes down to how much he's willing to sacrifice. GN'R has undoubtedly afforded him opportunities he wouldn't otherwise have had, but at some point his desire to create could outweigh the artistically barren existence GN'R offers these days, despite the financial stability that comes along with it. Maybe it turns out to be a good thing and Axl and GN'R view Thai as enough of an asset to appease and get the ball rolling on a creative level. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: The Wight Gunner on December 02, 2013, 03:10:06 PM My guess would be that he also had to pay a non-returnable deposit on these venues, so as well as dipping out on ticket sales he has lost money on setting these things up. Again a guess, but I'd imagine that the GnR fees would dwarf these gigs IF GnR shows go ahead, but then again maybe they don't. :-\
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Princess Leia on December 02, 2013, 04:18:16 PM We're nobody to judge what happens inside the GN'R camp - we are not there to know, you just hear from here and there and make your own little judgements. You're just supposing, guessing. Doesn't matter who's right or wrong - if he's inside the band and loves what he does inside (even if there are reasons for him to be angry at something) I don't think it's cool to go to the press to talk about it. I have a band (a shitty garage band). I don't go talk to my family about issues in the band. I talk to the guys in the band. I work at a place. If I have issues with my boss, I don't complain to my girl. I go talk to my boss and if I'm not happy, I'll leave. Point is: doesn't matter if you see this as a band thing, as a employer / emloyee thing or whatever. It's useless to complain about it to the press. I really don't believe this kind of thing makes things better. But I do believe it makes things worse. Seems like he likes Axl. So if he does (and I do believe he does) maybe he should realize this kind of behavior ends up demaging even more Axl's image because he looks like a villain - again. If I"m in a band, I don't want people to say shit about my band even though I might not be totally happy about it. If I'm working at a place, I don't want people to say shit about the place that gives me ways to live my life, even though I might not be so happy about it. No one put a gun on Ron's head to be there. I love the guy. I hope things are ok between the band and him. Sometimes extreme meassures are necessary. Axl did it in 1989 when he called out his then band mates because they were dancing with Mr Brownstone. Axl never meant that it was their last show. He just meant to reach out to them or to get their attention and reaction. Because he was frustrated and tired. My guess is Ron meant something similar not just air dirty laundry for the hell of it. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Dead N' Bloated on December 02, 2013, 04:23:00 PM My guess would be that he also had to pay a non-returnable deposit on these venues, so as well as dipping out on ticket sales he has lost money on setting these things up. Again a guess, but I'd imagine that the GnR fees would dwarf these gigs IF GnR shows go ahead, but then again maybe they don't. :-\ The promoter would have lost money on this, not Bumble, more than likely. Which is why he is pissed. Cancelling a show for "no good reason" can put a bad taste in a promoter's mouth because they have to back the show financially. :peace: Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: GeetarMikey on December 02, 2013, 04:46:05 PM Ron's a creative dude so he must get pretty frustrated with the lack of creative activity in GN'R. Even when he releases his own stuff, tries to tour it then has to cancel for yet another tour of GN'R hits it must get even doubly frustrating.
As far as the " Ron airing dirty laundry in public" goes, wasn't that the main thing Axl was doing on the UYI tour when he ranted at the audience about things in his life that were on his mind? I know it's technically *his* band, but let's not call Ron out for it, especially when it's something like this and not an attack on Warren Beatty or whoever was annoying Axl that day... That said, I hope BBF can carry on playing with them as he's probably one of the only guitarists in the world at his technical level and it's awesome to see him play with them at such a high level. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 05:54:15 PM Ron's a creative dude so he must get pretty frustrated with the lack of creative activity in GN'R. Even when he releases his own stuff, tries to tour it then has to cancel for yet another tour of GN'R hits it must get even doubly frustrating. I'm sorry, but that is a poor analogy. Venting about your own personal life on stage is one thing, venting about internal matters publicly is another. Axl has done that before, and it was a poor choice then, just as Ron's continual decision to do that now is a poor choice as it serves no constructive purpose towards the resolution of whatever issues there are.As far as the " Ron airing dirty laundry in public" goes, wasn't that the main thing Axl was doing on the UYI tour when he ranted at the audience about things in his life that were on his mind? I know it's technically *his* band, but let's not call Ron out for it, especially when it's something like this and not an attack on Warren Beatty or whoever was annoying Axl that day... That said, I hope BBF can carry on playing with them as he's probably one of the only guitarists in the world at his technical level and it's awesome to see him play with them at such a high level. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 06:27:09 PM I have always gotten the impression he's really the only one that questions the way things are done.
I don't know if the others are just beaten down, or cowed, or whatever. But Ron seems to be the only one that does not fall in line. And perhaps the lone voice asking "Does this sound nuts to anyone else?" You need that guy sometimes. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 06:37:12 PM I have always gotten the impression he's really the only one that questions the way things are done. Is that really the case? Or is it that Ron is the only one who raises questions publicly?I don't know if the others are just beaten down, or cowed, or whatever. But Ron seems to be the only one that does not fall in line. And perhaps the lone voice asking "Does this sound nuts to anyone else?" You need that guy sometimes. No offense, but how would you or I know if Tommy or Richard or Dizzy raised questions internally? Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: NaturalLight on December 02, 2013, 06:47:38 PM Here's my two cents for what it's worth:
Ron said he told management about his issues. Then he was asked a question during an interview and he answered it. It's not like there's going to be some bombshell surprise for the management peeps when/if they see the interview. Now, would he have answered the question publicly if he hadn't talked to management first? Who knows. Course that's not the issue. The other thing a bunch of people on here seem to forget is that these dudes have been here before. So public complaints are not anything new. Band members fight, people fight, whatever. Course some of the fans/speculators/whatever just like to create drama after they read a fucking interview. Also, as someone else said, it's not like Axl hasn't publicly bitched about something. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 06:54:39 PM Is that really the case? Or is it that Ron is the only one who raises questions publicly? No offense, but how would you or I know if Tommy or Richard or Dizzy raised questions internally? What's the difference? We work with what we have. I have these sorts of comments from him and nothing like that from the others. That's the issue. We always seem to run into this trap in the GNRverse, don't we? Can't ever just talk about what's in front of us. Because...hey, we don't know what happened "behind the scenes". Oh, but we can probably assume its the complete opposite thing, almost always. All that does is shut down the conversation. A band possibly the least entitled to the benefit of the doubt gets it in spades from certain segments of the fanbase. And its always exonerating, isn't it? What good fortune. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 07:09:03 PM Is that really the case? Or is it that Ron is the only one who raises questions publicly? No offense, but how would you or I know if Tommy or Richard or Dizzy raised questions internally? What's the difference? We work with what we have. I have these sorts of comments from him and nothing like that from the others. That's the issue. We always seem to run into this trap in the GNRverse, don't we? Can't ever just talk about what's in front of us. Because...hey, we don't know what happened "behind the scenes". Oh, but we can probably assume its the complete opposite thing, almost always. All that does is shut down the conversation. A band possibly the least entitled to the benefit of the doubt gets it in spades from certain segments of the fanbase. And its always exonerating, isn't it? What good fortune. There's a huge difference. Making a statement that Ron is the only way who questions how things are done is an assumption that may or may not be true. The fact is that if the other band members question things, but don't do it publicly, that doesn't mean that they aren't questioning things. It just means that aren't doing so publicly. I think you have to acknowledge that we cannot know what goes on behind the scenes with this band, because, for no other reason, it's the truth. That doesn't mean that there is complete incongruity between what the public sees and what the situation is in its totality (public and private). It's just acknowledging that there is a possibility. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 07:25:00 PM I think you have to acknowledge that we cannot know what goes on behind the scenes with this band, because, for no other reason, it's the truth. That doesn't mean that there is complete incongruity between what the public sees and what the situation is in its totality (public and private). It's just acknowledging that there is a possibility. Tell me this, Ali. Tell me if you either are this person, or if you at least accept the argument. We have 25 years of public behavior from Axl Rose to draw from, right? And while he is my favorite singer ever, always will be, the fact remains that he can act like an unprofessional jackass a lot of the time. Late start times, flying off the handle with rants, burning many bridges all around. We all see that. But I have seen people say "oh, so you KNOW him, personally?" And then we go into that since I didn't go to summer camp with him nor live in the same apartment complex, I can't possibly make an informed judgment on the man's behavior. Yeah? Bullshit. Is it *possible* he's a prince of a guy out of the public eye, at complete odds with the person he's presented in public for 25 years? I suppose. Is it likely? I'd argue no. And I'd take it even further and say I'm not even arguing that, because you can't disprove a negative. But I know what I see, and what I have seen since I stared following this guy at 12 years old. He can be a little off. Would you be a person that supports that concept? Or do I not have the basis to make such an assessment? Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: IKnowWhereIAM on December 02, 2013, 08:17:03 PM "...the man's a genius!" (Dennis Hopper/Apocalypse Now)
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 08:23:08 PM "...the man's a genius!" (Dennis Hopper/Apocalypse Now) Hahahaha. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 08:36:38 PM I think you have to acknowledge that we cannot know what goes on behind the scenes with this band, because, for no other reason, it's the truth. That doesn't mean that there is complete incongruity between what the public sees and what the situation is in its totality (public and private). It's just acknowledging that there is a possibility. Tell me this, Ali. Tell me if you either are this person, or if you at least accept the argument. We have 25 years of public behavior from Axl Rose to draw from, right? And while he is my favorite singer ever, always will be, the fact remains that he can act like an unprofessional jackass a lot of the time. Late start times, flying off the handle with rants, burning many bridges all around. We all see that. But I have seen people say "oh, so you KNOW him, personally?" And then we go into that since I didn't go to summer camp with him nor live in the same apartment complex, I can't possibly make an informed judgment on the man's behavior. Yeah? Bullshit. Is it *possible* he's a prince of a guy out of the public eye, at complete odds with the person he's presented in public for 25 years? I suppose. Is it likely? I'd argue no. And I'd take it even further and say I'm not even arguing that, because you can't disprove a negative. But I know what I see, and what I have seen since I stared following this guy at 12 years old. He can be a little off. Would you be a person that supports that concept? Or do I not have the basis to make such an assessment? But, certainly, one can look at Axl's behavior and say that he can behave like a jackass sometimes. Can we say that's the whole story when it comes to him? I wouldn't go there. Not unless I knew him personally, IMO. I think there's a difference between judging his behavior and judging the person. You making a call on his behavior is totally understandable, though. But, to be fair, the reality is we don't have 25 years of public behavior from him. We have bursts of a few years here and there of public behavior ('87-'93, 2000-2002, 2006-2007, 2009-2010, 2011-2012). Truthfully, there have been many years of complete and utter public silence from him. In other words, he really hasn't been in the public eye for a period of 25 years continuously. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 02, 2013, 09:09:32 PM But, to be fair, the reality is we don't have 25 years of public behavior from him. We have bursts of a few years here and there of public behavior ('87-'93, 2000-2002, 2006-2007, 2009-2010, 2011-2012). Truthfully, there have been many years of complete and utter public silence from him. In other words, he really hasn't been in the public eye for a period of 25 years continuously. Always with the semantics. The point is that we have a big enough body of work to form an opinion. We don't have to be blood brothers. But how it relates to Bumble's interview is that we go with what we know. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 02, 2013, 10:12:21 PM But, to be fair, the reality is we don't have 25 years of public behavior from him. We have bursts of a few years here and there of public behavior ('87-'93, 2000-2002, 2006-2007, 2009-2010, 2011-2012). Truthfully, there have been many years of complete and utter public silence from him. In other words, he really hasn't been in the public eye for a period of 25 years continuously. Always with the semantics. The point is that we have a big enough body of work to form an opinion. We don't have to be blood brothers. But how it relates to Bumble's interview is that we go with what we know. Not really semantics so much as a clarification, but be that as it may, yes, there is a large enough body of work to form the opinion that Axl can act like a jackass. No, you don't have to be blood brothers to form that opinion. But, there may be more to him than what we've seen, just like there may be more behind the scenes disagreements and questioning that we may be privy to. I'm not saying there is, just that it is certainly possible. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: One.In.A.Million on December 03, 2013, 03:36:17 AM You know what, when Ron joined GN'R in 2006. He WAS that guy who would sugar coat interviews to make it seem like "all is well and dandy", with the inner workings of GN'R. He would say that the band hang together all the time, he would say Axl's lateness was not an issue, and he would always make it seem like Chinese Democracy's release was right around the corner when asked.
BUT, now Ron has a totally different attitude, and he doesn't give a shit anymore about twisting the truth to give the "team Axl" answer. He has publicity criticised Axl's tardiness at arriving on time for shows, and has also let his frustrations be known about tour plans, recording, and a number of other things. Fact is, no matter if Richard, Dizzy or Tommy raise issues behind the scenes. They know it's a no go area, to publibily speak negatively of Axl or management. Because they know how the press will jump on it, like a fish on a hook. But Ron has got to the point where he is almost daring Axl to make a move, and he just doesn't care because he can see that nothing has/or ever will change in relation to Guns lack of structure and common sense. And lastly, no point in debating with Ali. He's one of those who wants to be seen as being the "Axl police", and he won't see the negative in anything and the things... The rest of us clearly are frustrated about. He would still be sitting behind his keyboard telling us to stop being negative, if we was still waiting for Chinese Democracy. :hihi: (and I'm not joking either) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jacdaniel on December 03, 2013, 06:21:35 AM Could have sworn I read this interview before but it was an interview with Slash and it was 1995 / 6.
Sick of the late starts. No communication. Not knowing when or if they would be starting work for a new album. What knowing what the future plans are. Not sure whether to commit to Guns or solo music. Pure frustration in general. I don't know what it is with Guns to be honest. Is it management, is it Axl, is it legal issues? What actually makes it so difficult to get together and record music and get it out there. Its really sad at this point and I get the feeling we will never actually know what the answer is. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: nick6sic6 on December 03, 2013, 07:53:21 AM Well,there goes the tight and problem-free line up it once was.
I wish I'll be wrong but I can see the avalanche coming down. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 08:34:59 AM Seems like he's upset because he can't just book shows to the left and right, he has that band's plans to consider. And sometimes they collide.
I guess he asked management something and got an answer. Then made new plans according to the answer he got, but then plans changed again. And now he's upset because he can't get an answer? Maybe nothing is set in stone so there's no real answer, yet? /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 09:22:04 AM Could have sworn I read this interview before but it was an interview with Slash and it was 1995 / 6. Sick of the late starts. No communication. Not knowing when or if they would be starting work for a new album. What knowing what the future plans are. Not sure whether to commit to Guns or solo music. Pure frustration in general. I don't know what it is with Guns to be honest. Is it management, is it Axl, is it legal issues? What actually makes it so difficult to get together and record music and get it out there. Its really sad at this point and I get the feeling we will never actually know what the answer is. Oh, I think we know. The common denominator for the same complaints over 2 decades is always one man. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: snead hearn on December 03, 2013, 09:23:12 AM "...the man's a genius!" (Dennis Hopper/Apocalypse Now) Hahahaha. "He's a prankster. Think about it. He gives man instincts. He gives you this extraordinary gift, and then what does He do, I swear for His own amusement, his own private, cosmic gag reel, He sets the rules in opposition. It's the goof of all time. Look but don't touch. Touch, but don't taste. Taste, don't swallow. Ahaha. And while you're jumpin' from one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's laughin' His sick, fuckin' ass off! He's a tight-ass! He's a SADIST! He's an absentee landlord! Worship that? NEVER!" - John Milton (Al Pacino) in "Devil's Advocate" Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 10:07:32 AM Could have sworn I read this interview before but it was an interview with Slash and it was 1995 / 6. Sick of the late starts. No communication. Not knowing when or if they would be starting work for a new album. What knowing what the future plans are. Not sure whether to commit to Guns or solo music. Pure frustration in general. I don't know what it is with Guns to be honest. Is it management, is it Axl, is it legal issues? What actually makes it so difficult to get together and record music and get it out there. Its really sad at this point and I get the feeling we will never actually know what the answer is. Oh, I think we know. The common denominator for the same complaints over 2 decades is always one man. You didn't mention VR. They weren't exactly one happy united "gang" there at the end and it had nothing to do with that one man. : ok: /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 03, 2013, 10:32:12 AM You know what, when Ron joined GN'R in 2006. He WAS that guy who would sugar coat interviews to make it seem like "all is well and dandy", with the inner workings of GN'R. He would say that the band hang together all the time, he would say Axl's lateness was not an issue, and he would always make it seem like Chinese Democracy's release was right around the corner when asked. What an idiotic comment. I see the negatives and realize the band hasn't realized it's full potential. I wish the live DVD was out and there was more new music. But, I also know that I have no control over any of that, so getting frustrated and needing to vent about it continually does me or anyone else no good. I will voice a disagreement or dissenting opinion with someone, though, no matter if that seems incomprehensibly optimistic to some or not.BUT, now Ron has a totally different attitude, and he doesn't give a shit anymore about twisting the truth to give the "team Axl" answer. He has publicity criticised Axl's tardiness at arriving on time for shows, and has also let his frustrations be known about tour plans, recording, and a number of other things. Fact is, no matter if Richard, Dizzy or Tommy raise issues behind the scenes. They know it's a no go area, to publibily speak negatively of Axl or management. Because they know how the press will jump on it, like a fish on a hook. But Ron has got to the point where he is almost daring Axl to make a move, and he just doesn't care because he can see that nothing has/or ever will change in relation to Guns lack of structure and common sense. And lastly, no point in debating with Ali. He's one of those who wants to be seen as being the "Axl police", and he won't see the negative in anything and the things... The rest of us clearly are frustrated about. He would still be sitting behind his keyboard telling us to stop being negative, if we was still waiting for Chinese Democracy. :hihi: (and I'm not joking either) And I've never told you or anyone else not to be negative. So, go ahead, be negative and vent your frustration and complain all you want. I know from history it won't change anything. : ok: Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: sofine11 on December 03, 2013, 10:41:59 AM Anyone notice DJ's latest tweet?
"If you bite the hand that feeds you.....you will go hungry" Hmm... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 10:53:00 AM Could have sworn I read this interview before but it was an interview with Slash and it was 1995 / 6. Sick of the late starts. No communication. Not knowing when or if they would be starting work for a new album. What knowing what the future plans are. Not sure whether to commit to Guns or solo music. Pure frustration in general. I don't know what it is with Guns to be honest. Is it management, is it Axl, is it legal issues? What actually makes it so difficult to get together and record music and get it out there. Its really sad at this point and I get the feeling we will never actually know what the answer is. Oh, I think we know. The common denominator for the same complaints over 2 decades is always one man. You didn't mention VR. They weren't exactly one happy united "gang" there at the end and it had nothing to do with that one man. : ok: Is that applicable though? If the conversation is about how every incarnation of GNR over 20 years has been plagued by the same problems, and Axl is the lone common denominator, does it really matter what some other band did? Axl hasn't been taking the stage late for over 20 years and being standoffish and reclusive because Scott Weiland can be a dick. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 11:17:19 AM The simple point is: Bands can have "issues" like any relationship. Professional or otherwise.
Even a "professional" band like Metallica! The difference is that with GN'R, Axl gets the blame. Even when we only hear one side of the story. Ron knows what he's doing. I'm sure he's aware of what his comments will cause among fans. A band that's given him all kinds of opportunities, and the focus is often on single issues like in the past when every other interview was about Axl going on late. Now that the shows start earlier, it's another issue. The media loves this kind of single sentences which they can use for headlines. He says something nice in the interview, but obviously it's not as interesting as something that can further the Axl the asshole myth. The same guy who's let every guitarist play their own song at the shows. In front of huge crowds.... /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 11:19:28 AM He says something nice in the interview, but obviously it's not as interesting as something that can further the Axl the asshole myth. The same guy who's let every guitarist play their own song at the shows. In front of huge crowds.... Yeah, because he likes leaving the stage a lot. Do you dispute that? Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: sofine11 on December 03, 2013, 11:21:17 AM The simple point is: Bands can have "issues" like any relationship. Professional or otherwise. Even a "professional" band like Metallica! The difference is that with GN'R, Axl gets the blame. Even when we only hear one side of the story. Ron knows what he's doing. I'm sure he's aware of what his comments will cause among fans. A band that's given him all kinds of opportunities, and the the focus is often on single issues like in the past when every other interview was about Axl going on late. Now that the shows start earlier, it's another issue. He says something nice in the interview, but obviously it's not as interesting as something that can further the Axl the asshole myth. The same guy who's let every guitarist play their own song at the shows. In front of huge crowds.... /jarmo Jarmo, do you think Ron's nearing the end of the road with GNR? I mean, I know people can read into things, but it's very hard not to take what he's saying here as a very public calling out of Team Brazil... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN´R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 11:28:38 AM Yeah, because he likes leaving the stage a lot. Do you dispute that? No. But are you aware that they could've easily done something else instead of guitar solos? Do you dispute that? Jarmo, do you think Ron's nearing the end of the road with GNR? I mean, I know people can read into things, but it's very hard not to take what he's saying here as a very public calling out of Team Brazil... No, I don't think so. I think it's just frustration that he should've kept between himself and those he thinks need to know about it. I don't buy all the doom and gloom scenarios some fans paint. Edited to add: Certain people, including the media, like to create all kinds of stories and "scenarios" based on one single sentence. If the interview hadn't had that part in it, would this discussion be this active? I don't think so.... If he hadn't mentioned his frustration in the interview, this interview would be "another BBF interview" instead of this "it's over" thing that some portray it as now. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 11:35:20 AM Yeah, because he likes leaving the stage a lot. Do you dispute that? No. But are you aware that they could've easily done something else instead of guitar solos? Do you dispute that? I think this argument is stronger if Axl stayed on stage during their songs, did some back up vocals, or whatever. I think the reasons for the multiple solos and letting Bumble or Tommy sing a song are to feature them a bit, yes. But it also gives Axl a breather, so everyone wins. Well, except us. The solos are the worst part of every bootleg I own, and I usually cut them out of the playlists. Thankfully, he spared us the drum solo since Matt's time. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Rainfox on December 03, 2013, 12:24:33 PM Scott Weiland's firing in Velvet Revolver is Axl Rose's fault. Why don't people get this?!? >:( ;) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: ITARocker on December 03, 2013, 12:48:18 PM Bumble has all my support, I always knew he was that kind of guy, love him. But at the same time he should have known that gnr actually is anything but a "band". A bRand at most. Get it...if you don't, just leave ... as many others did and as many others will. Being out or in gnr it doesn't really matter, there's just 1 person who fans care about...again...get it or leave. The owner owns, the employee always complain :yes:
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 03, 2013, 12:58:40 PM Could have sworn I read this interview before but it was an interview with Slash and it was 1995 / 6. Sick of the late starts. No communication. Not knowing when or if they would be starting work for a new album. What knowing what the future plans are. Not sure whether to commit to Guns or solo music. Pure frustration in general. I don't know what it is with Guns to be honest. Is it management, is it Axl, is it legal issues? What actually makes it so difficult to get together and record music and get it out there. Its really sad at this point and I get the feeling we will never actually know what the answer is. Oh, I think we know. The common denominator for the same complaints over 2 decades is always one man. You didn't mention VR. They weren't exactly one happy united "gang" there at the end and it had nothing to do with that one man. : ok: Is that applicable though? If the conversation is about how every incarnation of GNR over 20 years has been plagued by the same problems, and Axl is the lone common denominator, does it really matter what some other band did? Axl hasn't been taking the stage late for over 20 years and being standoffish and reclusive because Scott Weiland can be a dick. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 01:05:16 PM To GN'R? No, obviously not. It was just an extension of your argument, though. At least as I see it. The 2nd incarnation of Snakepit and Velvet Revolver had issues with the lead guitarist and the lead singer clashing. Using your argument, the common denominator would be the root cause of the issue. That's all. I have joked for years I would never get in a band with Slash at this point given his buzzard's luck with unpredictable frontmen. Haha. But no, its not an extension of my argument. Slash eventually left because he tired of Axl's bullshit with late times and inactivity. Years later Bucket left and Robin left for the same reasons. The common denominator is Axl Rose. And whether VR was a trainwreck or the greatest rock success story of alltime is irrelevant. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 03, 2013, 01:22:08 PM To GN'R? No, obviously not. It was just an extension of your argument, though. At least as I see it. The 2nd incarnation of Snakepit and Velvet Revolver had issues with the lead guitarist and the lead singer clashing. Using your argument, the common denominator would be the root cause of the issue. That's all. I have joked for years I would never get in a band with Slash at this point given his buzzard's luck with unpredictable frontmen. Haha. But no, its not an extension of my argument. Slash eventually left because he tired of Axl's bullshit with late times and inactivity. Years later Bucket left and Robin left for the same reasons. The common denominator is Axl Rose. And whether VR was a trainwreck or the greatest rock success story of alltime is irrelevant. For the record, I don't think that Slash was at fault for the demise of his bands, but I suspect that it is not as black and white as those situations have been portrayed from his perspective either. There are usually shades of gray in interpersonal conflicts. Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 01:31:10 PM For the record, I don't think that Slash was at fault for the demise of his bands, but I suspect that it is not as black and white as those situations have been portrayed from his perspective either. There are usually shades of gray in interpersonal conflicts. Oh, no doubt. That's why I said I say that in jest. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 03, 2013, 03:31:37 PM http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/bumblefoot-didnt-want-to-betray-axl-rose-by-jamming-with-slash/
more from ron on its ok to be friends with all former GNR guys except slash lol and more of the aforementioned about his solo tour and all things gnr Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 03, 2013, 03:34:15 PM and to me this is the part that has the most juice and the most conflict
Bumblefoot: "The future is completely unpredictable; you all should know that. It's just trying to say, 'Alright, what direction is the tornado gonna turn?' Anything can be. I'm sure that 2014? Actually, I shouldn't say 'sure,' because it's unpredictable. But I can assume, but when we assume, we make an ass out of? Probably there will be some shows in the future, and I'm hoping that there will be some completed recordings in the future. I would like to see the band write as a band from the ground up and put some music out there. I've been saying for years that we shouldn't even tackle an entire album because it's too big a bite to take. It's too much ? it takes too much time, too much of an investment of life that just doesn't exist. Not in this day and age, and not where things are with the band. We'd be better off just doing a song at a time and putting that out. What I've always wanted to do was, before each time we go out and do a leg of touring, that we get together for a week in the studio, we write a song, we finish that song no matter what it takes, we finish it and we put it out and we play it on that leg, we give it to radio. Every single time we go out and play, we have a new song that we're doing. And if we did that, it would be an album worth of material done that would be done by this band right now. Yeah, if I was master of the universe, that's what would have happened. I mean, you're dealing with seven other people and everybody's gotta be on board and everyone has to agree on a strategy. And it has to coincide with any existing, or preexisting business agreements that are there as well. I mean, it's complicated." Read more at http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/bumblefoot-didnt-want-to-betray-axl-rose-by-jamming-with-slash/#jaQKoow85u9Gdpc4.99 its verrrrry clear that he thinks its ridiculous to put out another record of material from buckethead and robin finck...and its very clear Axl has zero interest of writing new songs as a "band" or "group" ... and quite frankly... that fucking sucks Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Princess Leia on December 03, 2013, 04:01:28 PM Bullshit!!!! Slash recorded a song with The Dead Daisies. So if Richard didn?t betray Axl, then why BBF would if he team up with Slash?
Anyway, BBF has said management made contact with him. So everthing seems ok... at least for now Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Ali on December 03, 2013, 04:10:49 PM Bullshit!!!! Slash recorded a song with The Dead Daisies. So if Richard didn?t betray Axl, then why BBF would if he team up with Slash? Richard was not on that recording of the Dead Daisies song. He was not in the band for the recording of the first album. He joined for the subsequent tour and future recordings.Anyway, BBF has said management made contact with him. So everthing seems ok... at least for now Ali Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: LunsJail on December 03, 2013, 04:14:28 PM Wow, it's sad that he has to take to the media to get "management" to respond.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 04:34:52 PM its verrrrry clear that he thinks its ridiculous to put out another record of material from buckethead and robin finck...and its very clear Axl has zero interest of writing new songs as a "band" or "group" ... and quite frankly... that fucking sucks Where do you get that he thinks it's ridiculous? And where do you get the number on how interested Axl is in writing/recording with the band? /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 05:41:30 PM and to me this is the part that has the most juice and the most conflict Bumblefoot: "The future is completely unpredictable; you all should know that. It's just trying to say, 'Alright, what direction is the tornado gonna turn?' Anything can be. I'm sure that 2014? Actually, I shouldn't say 'sure,' because it's unpredictable. But I can assume, but when we assume, we make an ass out of? Probably there will be some shows in the future, and I'm hoping that there will be some completed recordings in the future. I would like to see the band write as a band from the ground up and put some music out there. I've been saying for years that we shouldn't even tackle an entire album because it's too big a bite to take. It's too much ? it takes too much time, too much of an investment of life that just doesn't exist. Not in this day and age, and not where things are with the band. We'd be better off just doing a song at a time and putting that out. What I've always wanted to do was, before each time we go out and do a leg of touring, that we get together for a week in the studio, we write a song, we finish that song no matter what it takes, we finish it and we put it out and we play it on that leg, we give it to radio. Every single time we go out and play, we have a new song that we're doing. And if we did that, it would be an album worth of material done that would be done by this band right now. Yeah, if I was master of the universe, that's what would have happened. I mean, you're dealing with seven other people and everybody's gotta be on board and everyone has to agree on a strategy. And it has to coincide with any existing, or preexisting business agreements that are there as well. I mean, it's complicated." Read more at http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/bumblefoot-didnt-want-to-betray-axl-rose-by-jamming-with-slash/#jaQKoow85u9Gdpc4.99 its verrrrry clear that he thinks its ridiculous to put out another record of material from buckethead and robin finck...and its very clear Axl has zero interest of writing new songs as a "band" or "group" ... and quite frankly... that fucking sucks Agree 100%. How excited can you get about being given a basically finished song and asked to cut and paste some riffs over top of it, then have it called "collaboration"? I see no reason to release any more Buckethead and Robin stuff. Minimize it at least. I'd ideally like some new stuff form people actually IN THE DAMN BAND. Back-up plan, maybe re-record some of the older CD era songs if you think the song itself is too strong to waste. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 05:44:04 PM Where do you get that he thinks it's ridiculous? And where do you get the number on how interested Axl is in writing/recording with the band? How about a years long track record? How's that grab you? Ron has said they have yet to be in a room all together to write a note. Nada. Zip. Zilch. He's been in the band 7 years now. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 05:54:22 PM Where do you get that he thinks it's ridiculous? And where do you get the number on how interested Axl is in writing/recording with the band? How about a years long track record? How's that grab you? Ron has said they have yet to be in a room all together to write a note. Nada. Zip. Zilch. He's been in the band 7 years now. And this means he can't be interested in recording with the band in the future? Nice try. Read the whole quote. :) /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 06:10:13 PM And this means he can't be interested in recording with the band in the future? Nice try. Read the whole quote. :) Seven years, Jarmo. Seven years is a long god damn time. You want to me to believe this all part of the plan. Fine. I could make a more convincing argument the band is little more than a touring band and nothing else. I wouldn't make that case, but I make that easier than you would trying to tell us that after the seven year lull...he's ready to pounce!! Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 03, 2013, 06:18:35 PM Seven years? This current line up didn't exist seven years ago. Just saying...
I don't think I need to break down the years since Dj joined because we all know what the band has done during that time. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 03, 2013, 06:21:39 PM Seven years? This current line up didn't exist seven years ago. Just saying... I don't think I need to break down the years since Dj joined because we all know what the band has done during that time. Ron's first show was 5/12/2006. Since that time, they have yet to write a note. 5/12/2006 right through...12/3/2013, Rolex time. Frankly, I rounded down. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Siamese Democracy on December 03, 2013, 08:13:10 PM Seven years? This current line up didn't exist seven years ago. Just saying... I don't think I need to break down the years since Dj joined because we all know what the band has done during that time. /jarmo That didn't hold Axl back from releasing Chinese Democracy 2 years after BBF joined. Axl can do anything he puts his mind to Jarmo you know that. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 04, 2013, 01:40:47 AM Read more at http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/bumblefoot-didnt-want-to-betray-axl-rose-by-jamming-with-slash/#jaQKoow85u9Gdpc4.99 when we had the big management fight, before joining the band, I remember hanging out with him and he liked the fact that I went after his team of lawyers that the manager sent after me to try to take me down, and I just came out swinging at them. what is this Frankly, I rounded down. lol @ this ;D #daily jarmo vs D :coffee: :hihi: Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jacdaniel on December 04, 2013, 07:31:33 AM Based on that interview, I think its safe to assume that a new album with the current line up is not something thats even on the cards.
Sounds like any potential new album is far down the road. This is the most confusing situation ever... a band that spent years making an album. Did nothing to promote it. Do a few tours but don't seem to have any real desire to write new music or put anything out. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 04, 2013, 08:45:01 AM This is the most confusing situation ever... a band that spent years making an album. Did nothing to promote it. Didn't Axl sue Azoff (or the company) for lack of promotion? Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jacdaniel on December 04, 2013, 09:04:07 AM This is the most confusing situation ever... a band that spent years making an album. Did nothing to promote it. Didn't Axl sue Azoff (or the company) for lack of promotion? Thats not really the point I'm making. It just baffles me... whose to blame? Why didn't they promote the album? Why didn't the Better video get released? Why don't they write or record together? Will there ever be a new album? If its all management, haven't they been through quite a few changes of management already? Is it just a coincidence that every management team has failed? As fans of a band, the least you deserve to know is whether the band plans on releasing new music and if so, a rough idea of a timeframe. 2 years, 5 years, longer than that? Its always the same with Guns. Never any answers. Even the members of the band don't seem to know what the plans are. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 04, 2013, 09:47:59 AM It just baffles me... whose to blame? Why didn't they promote the album? The media and the company desire a reunion of the original band I guess. I would assume that is (was) the economical intrest of the company, and the demand from 'the public'. Is it just a coincidence that every management team has failed? Can be all kinds of things. It's not really our buisness and I am sure he is very professional to work with, but Axl has been open about having personal problems due to childhoodstuff. 'leave axl alone!' :'( As fans of a band, the least you deserve to know is whether the band plans on releasing new music and if so, a rough idea of a timeframe. 2 years, 5 years, longer than that? Yeah, but...idkwtf :-X Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jacdaniel on December 04, 2013, 10:52:34 AM At the end of the day, I'm not going to knock Axl, management or anyone in the band. I genuinely don't know what the reasons are. They could be all very valid reasons.
The only thing I do know is that they don't seem to be in any way organised, productive or offer any kind of indication of what we might expect in the future in terms of new music etc. This band just doesn't seem capable of any sustained productivity. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 04, 2013, 11:25:38 AM This band just doesn't seem capable of any sustained productivity. lol fail! (http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?board=22.0) :P Not that I don't want more releases badly tho. Maybe Axl isn't satisfied with external terms/conditions (promo), dunno. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: axlrosegnr on December 04, 2013, 05:58:02 PM People have bad days and vent. I do. Everyone does. Simple as that.
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 05, 2013, 08:55:37 AM Maybe Axl isn't satisfied with external terms/conditions (promo), dunno. Yeah, but his little tantrum after the least release, how is that going help him? You can't go on walkabout for a year after your album comes out and then express surprise they don't want to really invest in promoting you going forward. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 05, 2013, 10:00:14 AM You can't go on walkabout for a year after your album comes out and then express surprise they don't want to really invest in promoting you going forward. Aren't you rewriting history by stating something like that? Quote What are your thoughts on how Universal has handled the album? Unfortunately I have no information for me to believe [that] there was any real involvement or effort from Interscope. I'm not saying there wasn't. But in my opinion, without [Interscope Geffen A&M chairman] Jimmy Iovine's involvement, it doesn't matter who anyone talks to or what they say -- virtually nothing will happen from their end. I do know [that] I've been asking for a marketing plan for over five years and still haven't got anything. We've asked for a complete breakdown of promotion expenses and efforts from all parties but unfortunately I've received very little information, if anything, so far. On another note, the draft booklet leaking and, I believe, the early shipping of preorders and the inclusion of the early draft booklet for the release was through involvement with Interscope, which was a mess. That's not to say they don't work for other artists and make things happen. I feel they work very hard for whatever it is they truly want to sell, whether it's good or ... I can say how the band feels, and that is that to a man they hate the record company other than Universal International with a passion. And that's with me talking with them about the record company negatively hardly ever, if at all. They're not blind: They hear the talk and see the results. Our involvement with Interscope has been more than frustrating for them. It's not like anyone here wants to have any negative views, impressions or opinions. They don't go around bitching about things all the time and they don't let it get in the way of whatever they're supposed to do here, but it is what it is. Here's how things worked until they were no longer involved-that is, until recently. Jimmy [Iovine] and whoever would come down to the studio. Things would be good for a month. Then, according to whoever was involved at the time from their side, someone above Jimmy would start putting pressure regarding us on him, Jimmy would start pressuring others at his label [and they] would begin doing the same with us. We get that it's just how business -- and perhaps especially this business -- tends to work, but after a month of this the whole thing would get ugly and extensively interfere with getting anything productive done, and near the middle of the third month we'd arrange for Jimmy to come down again. They'd go away happy and the entire process would repeat itself over and over and over. [Former Interscope Geffen A&M president] Tom Whalley brought in Roy Thomas Baker to produce and [A&R executive] Mark Williams suggested Marco Beltrami, among others, to play strings on the album. And Jimmy had an idea for low guitar in a track and the EQ on a drum part. That's it as far as I'm aware. They were all good things, but in all sincerity, that's it. Now, what efforts were made to help keep Universal or Vivendi off us for as long as possible could very well have been extensive, and in that regard either would have been or would be most appreciated. I like Jimmy, but I've never understood him in regard to us or this album. Everything's always been, "That's easy," or "We can fix that, no problem," but unfortunately rarely added up to any kind of reality for us until [he found] Bob Ludwig for mastering. We'd love to have their and Jimmy's support after this. But to continue at this juncture feeling as we do, keeping things so behind the scenes, unfortunately feels like the same 'ol same 'ol for all of us and, at least momentarily, a bit much to digest. Jimmy did point us in the right direction for mastering, and I believe he's sincere in his appreciation of our record but still for whatever reasons gave up pretty early in those areas. We feel that, unfortunately, we've never been really anything all that much more other than a throw it at the wall, see if it sticks, no real ground work, something to take advantage of, last quarter, cook the books, write-off, fuck this headache, hoping to get lucky scam. And, unfortunately, for all their nice words and assurances, nothing that's happened since the week or so before the release has shown us much of anything to the contrary. So at least in regard to the U.S., for the most part I don't look at it like we have a record company -- I look at it for the most part like we have friendly but otherwise cutthroat loan sharks, and we were lucky to get what we got but feel we could have done more if they were at least, especially with some of their backgrounds, a bit more involved creatively. So in light of pirating and the mess the major labels are in, I have no sympathy for the record companies, based on our experiences in the U.S. The Billboard Q&A: Axl Rose - Billboard February 14, 2009 issue (http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/articles/showarticle.php?articleid=169) Interview was hardly done a year after the album's release. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 05, 2013, 11:41:43 AM You can't go on walkabout for a year after your album comes out and then express surprise they don't want to really invest in promoting you going forward. Aren't you rewriting history by stating something like that? No, I am not. For starters, I am talking about the future. Really just trying to get ahead of the usual storyline where Axl can't get a break as explanation for why things don't happen. I think its completely dishonest to not put some blame on him for that sort of thing. As for the thing you quoted, its from February 2009? Well...what did he do from mid 2008 to February 2009 to improve the situation? He didn't like how things were handled, fine. But then it becomes cut your nose to spite your face time with him going MIA. Reports were that he was incommunicado from about September 2008 onward. Who did that help? Guess he showed them though, right? What a righteous warrior for truth and justice. Even if you think the label done you wrong, at what point do you take some personal responsibility for your own operation? In no rational universe does it make sense that since you aren't happy with the label's approach that you, the artist, does nothing. What is that accomplishing? He's on the cover of the Rolling Stone with a phone call. But he'd rather be mad and show them. The result? A band with no real relevance outside diehards on the internet and ticket buyers wanting to hear the classic songs. Which is unfortunate. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 05, 2013, 12:50:57 PM What is he supposed to do? It's his and the band's record. He can do what he wants! :hihi:
Yeah yeah yeah, I know you love that answer. But at the end of the day, it's his choice. Even though you can scold him for it for years because he didn't do what you wanted him to. I know you're still "upset" about the events around the album's release over five years ago. What did he do? He gave interviews, wanted to put out the album with its proper artwork.... It seems like it was a all or nothing thing. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 05, 2013, 01:16:43 PM What is he supposed to do? It's his and the band's record. He can do what he wants! :hihi: Yeah yeah yeah, I know you love that answer. But at the end of the day, it's his choice. Even though you can scold him for it for years because he didn't do what you wanted him to. I don't have to scold anyone. Simply point to the results. They are self evident. Its only at this particular site its been deemed a screaming success. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 05, 2013, 01:56:48 PM It came out, I can listen to it. That's all I care about as a fan.
A bunch of the music I listen to doesn't sell millions of copies and get promoted with appearances on day time talk shows. I can live with that. :) /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: westcoast_junkie on December 05, 2013, 02:12:11 PM How did this turn into a business-discussion, when CDs promoting wasn't even mentioned in the interview?
Maybe it's only here CD is considered a success. Maybe because the members here cares more for art than business? Or quality over quantity? We should appreciate Bumblefoots honesty. Interviews always make the board come to live 👍 Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 05, 2013, 02:50:43 PM Maybe it's only here CD is considered a success. Maybe because the members here cares more for art than business? Or quality over quantity? Haha. Well, I suppose that's one spin. I think the more general assessment of the gang here would be...well, I hesitate to use the word "apologist", due to its overly negative implications. So let's just leave it that around here, rarely is heard a discouraging word. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 05, 2013, 03:12:17 PM Maybe it's only here CD is considered a success. Maybe because the members here cares more for art than business? Or quality over quantity? Haha. Well, I suppose that's one spin. I think the more general assessment of the gang here would be...well, I hesitate to use the word "apologist", due to its overly negative implications. So let's just leave it that around here, rarely is heard a discouraging word. As far as the music goes... I would expect most to be very supportive of it around here...we are all fans of Axl it's when people see no fault in the way things are handled aside from the music...that is what I will never understand Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Limulus on December 05, 2013, 03:20:08 PM Bumbles's book about all this could be a great seller ;D
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 05, 2013, 03:28:45 PM As far as the music goes... I would expect most to be very supportive of it around here...we are all fans of Axl it's when people see no fault in the way things are handled aside from the music...that is what I will never understand Agree with you 100%. I liked the album. I think at least half of the songs stand up with anything the old band ever did. Some really strong stuff on there. On that, I have no real qualms. But the other bit, yeah, that's where I feel like pulling my hair out sometimes. At this level of band, music is a business. Viewed through that prism, the operation needs some work. But, to be fair, with the fan club seeming to have their shit together, to the band taking the stage closer to on time, there is some hope. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 05, 2013, 03:44:02 PM Bumbles's book about all this could be a great seller ;D are you kidding? it would be epic...lol Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 05, 2013, 03:49:02 PM As far as the music goes... I would expect most to be very supportive of it around here...we are all fans of Axl it's when people see no fault in the way things are handled aside from the music...that is what I will never understand Agree with you 100%. I liked the album. I think at least half of the songs stand up with anything the old band ever did. Some really strong stuff on there. On that, I have no real qualms. But the other bit, yeah, that's where I feel like pulling my hair out sometimes. At this level of band, music is a business. Viewed through that prism, the operation needs some work. But, to be fair, with the fan club seeming to have their shit together, to the band taking the stage closer to on time, there is some hope. personally the fan club is of very little interest to me... so are the start times.... would i rather the show not start at midnight? yeah...but it doesnt deter me from going its the fact that theres all these songs we know about from 10 years ago... that still have no release in sight, its this DVD that appears no closer to under my xmas tree than ever before, it's the Better video being scrapped, its the fact that his inner circle are just glorified "yes" men who have more say over GNR matters than actual band members.... (which leads back to original topic...ron says he really doesnt know wahts happening with plans until last minute...his words...not mine) and when you are trying to fight the never going away shadow of these enormous personalities that used to be in band ...... you need to get this shit out there and be more on point... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 05, 2013, 04:00:37 PM its verrrrry clear that he thinks its ridiculous to put out another record of material from buckethead and robin finck...and its very clear Axl has zero interest of writing new songs as a "band" or "group" ... and quite frankly... that fucking sucks Where do you get that he thinks it's ridiculous? And where do you get the number on how interested Axl is in writing/recording with the band? /jarmo these are the thoughts I take from reading his interview.... maybe im very wrong? but i dont think so... that is my belief Ron has been in the band for 7 years ago...and they havent written one song together.... unless its top secret... ron has said its never happened...so I take his word for it... if there was interest by Axl... what are they waiting for ? and as far as me saying that Ron thinks its ridiculous to release old songs by people not in the band? well i do believe this is not the first time Ron has said the band needs to create new stuff as a group Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: Jay Tea on December 06, 2013, 03:54:58 AM I've been dying to see Bumblefoot play a solo show.
But, having just gone through a similar situation (canceling solo tour dates to play with the way bigger band that i'm not the frontman of, only to have the band show cancelled.....sigh) I feel that the bigger band has to come first no matter what. You can say "I've got all this other material" and "I was doing this long before I became a side man" but at the end of the day the promoters on your solo gigs are going to put "of GUNS N ROSES" on the poster and you are going to play GNR songs in the show. It's a catch 22. You can't book the solo gigs because you might have band stuff. But the only reason you are getting offered good solo gigs is because you are in that band. I hope they offer Ron a definite solid block of time off to do this. But if they don't I still think he should stick it out w/ GNR. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 06, 2013, 09:49:22 AM Maybe it's only here CD is considered a success. Maybe because the members here cares more for art than business? Or quality over quantity? Well, I always thought CD was mediocre. Expected more voice-acrobatics and varied musicstyles based on new technology. I didn't expect it to lean so heavily into traditional, classic rock and it had too much soft songs imo. /flameshield on :nervous: Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 06, 2013, 03:24:10 PM If Bumble looses faith in GNR I will loose it too. A band is not a band until it releases music together. I have loved this band for decades. But if he?s out, I?m out too. Because if that should happen, there?s nothing left to hope for. Take your "we don?t owe you anything" and shove it up your ass. :P simple as that....
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 06, 2013, 03:31:27 PM If Bumble looses faith in GNR I will loose it too. A band is not a band until it releases music together. I have loved this band for decades. But if he?s out, I?m out too. Because it that should happen, there?s nothing left to hope for. Take your "we don?t owe you anything" and shove it up your ass. :P Well, just to play devil's advocate here, how are they a band now? I guess I'm asking what's your distinction? Ron has already told us they have yet to write a note together in the 7 years he's been in the fold. By your definition, they aren't much of a band right now, right? Even if Ron sticks around, are they really going to do anything in 2014 on the recording or releasing new music front? There is no evidence to support that premise. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 06, 2013, 03:33:00 PM There?s "Going Down".
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 06, 2013, 03:34:08 PM And there?s the little HOPE I have - cause I just love that band - been loving them for sooooooo long. Don?t know..... :rant:
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 06, 2013, 03:36:41 PM If Bumble looses faith in GNR I will loose it too. A band is not a band until it releases music together. I have loved this band for decades. But if he?s out, I?m out too. Because it that should happen, there?s nothing left to hope for. Take your "we don?t owe you anything" and shove it up your ass. :P Well, just to play devil's advocate here, how are they a band now? I guess I'm asking what's your distinction? Ron has already told us they have yet to write a note together in the 7 years he's been in the fold. By your definition, they aren't much of a band right now, right? Even if Ron sticks around, are they really going to do anything in 2014 on the recording or releasing new music front? There is no evidence to support that premise. They are constantly touring - which makes Axl more money than releasing music. But to be honest, they are NOT a REAL band by my definition...true ;) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 06, 2013, 03:42:29 PM If Bumble looses faith in GNR I will loose it too. A band is not a band until it releases music together. I have loved this band for decades. But if he?s out, I?m out too. Because it that should happen, there?s nothing left to hope for. Take your "we don?t owe you anything" and shove it up your ass. :P Well, just to play devil's advocate here, how are they a band now? I guess I'm asking what's your distinction? Ron has already told us they have yet to write a note together in the 7 years he's been in the fold. By your definition, they aren't much of a band right now, right? Even if Ron sticks around, are they really going to do anything in 2014 on the recording or releasing new music front? There is no evidence to support that premise. They are constantly touring - which makes Axl more money than releasing music. But to be honest, they are NOT a REAL band by my definition...true ;) Oh yeah, I was hardly disagreeing with your assessment. I think its spot on. Its funny to the point of being downright sad this band has done nothing on the creation front for at least 7 years. And that's just what we know of from Ron. Its probably longer. Unless we are to believe they were frantically writing and creating up until 5 minutes before Ron joined. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 06, 2013, 03:51:58 PM If Bumble looses faith in GNR I will loose it too. A band is not a band until it releases music together. I have loved this band for decades. But if he?s out, I?m out too. Because it that should happen, there?s nothing left to hope for. Take your "we don?t owe you anything" and shove it up your ass. :P Well, just to play devil's advocate here, how are they a band now? I guess I'm asking what's your distinction? Ron has already told us they have yet to write a note together in the 7 years he's been in the fold. By your definition, they aren't much of a band right now, right? Even if Ron sticks around, are they really going to do anything in 2014 on the recording or releasing new music front? There is no evidence to support that premise. They are constantly touring - which makes Axl more money than releasing music. But to be honest, they are NOT a REAL band by my definition...true ;) Oh yeah, I was hardly disagreeing with your assessment. I think its spot on. Its funny to the point of being downright sad this band has done nothing on the creation front for at least 7 years. And that's just what we know of from Ron. Its probably longer. Unless we are to believe they were frantically writing and creating up until 5 minutes before Ron joined. THIS. It?s just SAD. I just feel sad about it....Axl wanted people to stick with him through all the shit? We did. What is HE doing? Well I forgot, he is NOT owing us anything.....sure...what about owing something to his band-mates at least? WAKE UP AXL - or it will be just...all gone... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 06, 2013, 04:02:53 PM I'm not in a band nor do I write songs. But, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, there's two ways you can write "as a band".
You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Does anybody believe the original songs on the Use Your Illusions were all written in a room by the whole band? /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 06, 2013, 04:05:09 PM well Dizzy, Tommy and Chris dont seem to care ha....
but their old drummer and guitar players...(no im not talking about slash izzy and matt) all left because they got fed up with the inactivity and uncertainty ...because even tho they might have written the CD songs as a band they didnt make any band decisions as a band .. that was all axls call.. eventually im sure Ron and one or two others will do the same.... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 06, 2013, 04:07:21 PM I'm not in a band nor do I write songs. But, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, there's two ways you can write "as a band". You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Does anybody believe the original songs on the Use Your Illusions were all written in a room by the whole band? /jarmo i agree... they dont need to be in the same room to do so...whatever configuration of the band isnt gunna have that romantic thing of creating songs in a basement somewhere but have they done anything with the ideas they have created seperately or in small groups as you said? Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 06, 2013, 04:08:58 PM You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Dunno. But the complete lack of results suggest something is. And besides, the scant bits of info we do hear about are working on old ass tracks from 10 years ago now. There are no Rose/Ashba/Thal compositions, which is the whole damn point. Sending Ron a master track of a song they put together in 2003 and telling him to cut and paste some riffs over top of it is not exactly the stuff of Lennon/McCartney here. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 06, 2013, 04:12:53 PM I'm not in a band nor do I write songs. But, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, there's two ways you can write "as a band". You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Does anybody believe the original songs on the Use Your Illusions were all written in a room by the whole band? It?s not about "being in one room" or "being in 5 different studios" Jarmo. It?s about NOTHING happening at all. It?s about "respect the current line up" while we prefer constant touring with "old songs" to taking the risk of releasing new music. They are your family - I know that and respect that. Respect my HONEST opinion. Somebody needs to kicks Axl?s ass or get him going again or it will end. Ron will leave. Dj - nobody knows...maybe touring will pay his bills. But this is NOT A BAND. I love the band, I want it to LIVE. If you want to support a dead horse - no matter what - go on Jarmo . Ban me. Give me bad carma. But I love that fucking band, and NO ONE will ever ban me from speaking my mind. I?m a GNR fan after all. Shove it up your ass! ;= /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 06, 2013, 04:30:09 PM Funny.
"All we want is the album", album comes out. "All we want is a tour", tour starts. "We don't want shows! We want an album, it's not a band". And now there's a definition of what a band is. That's amusing. Are you saying guys recording a song together is more of a band than the same guys playing 200+ shows together? Where do you draw the line? Is one recorded song worth more than one show? What's the equation like? I'm curious. And besides, the scant bits of info we do hear about are working on old ass tracks from 10 years ago now. What's the problem? November Rain was "too old" when it was released? Do you enjoy those Hollywood Rose tracks that appear on GN'R albums? Tracks written by a band that existed before GN'R... Oh no! The horror! But, anyway. It's impossible for GN'R to write as a band since it's been "decided" that they're not a band to begin with. :hihi: Amusing. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 06, 2013, 04:51:03 PM Relevant rockmusic has always evolved around creative usage of new technology and many got a renewed intrest in gnr after Oh My God and Buckethead joined. So, many of us have diferent music-intrests here and I wonder how the next record gonna be. To me, adding Axl's voice on VR-songs would just be mediocre rockmusic with an exceptional voice. Axl voices on Buckethead's gems on the other hand...that sounds godlike to me. I honestly that classic hardrock in general is 'over' as far as mainstream success is concerned. Quote There are no Rose/Ashba/Thal compositions Yeah, would be cool with stuff from the curent line-up. Expected more voice-acrobatics and varied musicstyles based on new technology. PS Having said this I put Axl on a very high standard tho! ;) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: ITARocker on December 06, 2013, 05:24:24 PM I'm not in a band nor do I write songs. But, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, there's two ways you can write "as a band". You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Does anybody believe the original songs on the Use Your Illusions were all written in a room by the whole band? /jarmo I've already tried to explain to you sometimes ago...You can and you have to do both things, if you don't want to have an album which has good songs on it but wich mainly sucks because it sounds still like a demo...But it's not all about the songwriting itself... It's all about working togheter, DISCUSSING ABOUT THINGS, and not only putting here and there riffs, solos, vocals etc... The illusions were written in different times and places but people had the same background and a lot of the songs were written in the 80's. They were a kind of (disfunctional) family...the actual incarnation of gnr is different.. But different doesn't mean that everything has to be different. There's always a discipline at work that people should follow. You can't put togheter songs just like a fuckin' puzzle, it just doesn't work... Wasn't buckethead who said that some of his solos played on CD are pieces of different solos put all togheter by axl himself in the mixing work (and obviously he did'nt like it, because he wasn't even asked and well...he left) ? This is not a good work ethic.. It's just my hopinion, obviously. But BF interview shows that things haven't changed...I just hope they haven't get from bad to worse... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: draguns on December 06, 2013, 08:45:47 PM I'm not in a band nor do I write songs. But, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, there's two ways you can write "as a band". You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Does anybody believe the original songs on the Use Your Illusions were all written in a room by the whole band? /jarmo To answer that last question, one of the greatest albums of ALL-TIME was written as a group working together in the same place. That album is also why most people are GNR fans. Just saying. ;) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: GNR2014 on December 06, 2013, 11:42:37 PM I'm not in a band nor do I write songs. But, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, there's two ways you can write "as a band". You either get the whole band in a room together and try to create something that everybody's excited about and record it. Or you get together in smaller groups, let's say two or three band members, you write songs/come up with ideas that you then present to the rest... What's stopping the band members from employing tactic number two, if getting all eight band members in the same place at the same time to write, is too complicated? Does anybody believe the original songs on the Use Your Illusions were all written in a room by the whole band? /jarmo To answer that last question, one of the greatest albums of ALL-TIME was written as a group working together in the same place. That album is also why most people are GNR fans. Just saying. ;) Quote Describe the writing process for Chinese Democracy Tommy Sinson:"I came in around ?98, when the band was still writing the record. It was Paul Tobias and Robin Finck on guitar, Dizzy Reed and Chris Pitman on keys, Josh on drums, and me. Everybody was just slowly starting to bring in ideas. We were set up at Rumbo Records, a big studio out in the middle of nowhere. A funny thing ? Captain & Tennille own it. The whole thing looks like a boat. Anyway, we all just started hammering ideas out. Essentially, it was eight guys collaborating. To be thrown into that kind of environment ? eight guys from very different walks of life ? was very crazy. I?d never worked in that way, but it was cool. There were guys who?d never ever made a record putting out their ideas. At first, those of us who?d actually made records thought their ideas sucked, but there were also some good ones." Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: One.In.A.Million on December 07, 2013, 04:14:53 AM Of course an album can be made without any of the players being in the same room, or even knowing each other. Is it ideal?, absolutely not... and that's the whole point. Why should Guns have to record in that way?, fact is that it doesn't need to be like this with simple planning and preparation... but we all know that rarely happens in GN'R world.
Why can't it be made possible, to book a few weeks out where the band can all get together and collaborate as a group?. We all know this could be made possible if it was considered an absolute priority by Axl or management. And that's another reason why I think it's obvious that the next album will be almost all CD era pre recorded and written tracks, achieved by Finck, Bucket and Brain. For whatever reason, you can't deny that it at least seems like Axl is in no hurry at all to get this current band all together to write as a collective. :o Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: rebelhipi on December 07, 2013, 08:51:39 AM im throwing my 3 cents.
i have enjoyed greatly every guns album so far, i have no doubts that they will do it again. so let them do their thing and probably they will blow us away again. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 07, 2013, 11:34:35 AM You can't put togheter songs just like a fuckin' puzzle, it just doesn't work... Did you ever listen to anything besides rock music? Anything featuring samples? :hihi: Even Chinese Democracy was written with the group working together in the same place. Sure, people working together in a room. But some of those guys had left the band when the album came out. Which is the thing some people object to now! Using songs written by previous line ups, or songs written years ago, has been ok in the past, but not now. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: norway on December 07, 2013, 11:59:02 AM one of the greatest albums of ALL-TIME was written as a group working together in the same place. Many AFD-songs were created before the official line-up worked together. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: sofine11 on December 07, 2013, 04:05:37 PM You can't put togheter songs just like a fuckin' puzzle, it just doesn't work... Did you ever listen to anything besides rock music? Anything featuring samples? :hihi: Even Chinese Democracy was written with the group working together in the same place. Sure, people working together in a room. But some of those guys had left the band when the album came out. Which is the thing some people object to now! Using songs written by previous line ups, or songs written years ago, has been ok in the past, but not now. /jarmo I gotta say, regarding this issue, I agree with Jarmo completely. You would think anyone who was into Chinese Democracy would be completely psyched about the prospect of the other half of the tracks written during that time seeing the light of day. Regarding these tracks being referred to as "leftovers" or tracks that "didn't make the cut", I've said it before, Axl's a bit nutty, but he ain't stupid. We know the initial plan was to release multiple albums within a reasonable timeframe from eachother. Why would Axl blow his wad and put all of the very best tracks on the first album? For example, when Baz was blown away by "The General" Axl informed him that it was meant for a subsequent album, not Chinese. Also, during interviews around Chinese's release, Axl cited "Soul Monster/Leave Me Alone" as his favorite track, Chris said "Beta's Barn" was his favorite, and Richard simply said his favorite as "One you haven't heard yet!". So yeah, I think there's some amazing music that has yet to be released, and we really shouldn't care one iota who wrote it, or is featured on it, only that it sees a release. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: GnR-NOW on December 07, 2013, 04:12:57 PM I personally want to hear more Bucket and Finck era songs. Picture Axl singing over Nottingham Lace :beer:
Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: BOILER GUNZ on December 08, 2013, 12:34:24 AM My general IQ and my GNR IQ must be no where near as close to that of others round here who seem to literally know every fucking thing about the band, the entire history of everything and everyone ever associated with Guns from day one or even pre-day one.
I think those of us normal fans just want all the music that we can possibly get into our ears per Axl, per the label, per the occasional leaker...I fucking love you leakers out there...you are the essence of some rebel cause that guns has exuded at least for me, as a die hard fan for twenty-five years now and running. I want to hear it all. Everything that Ron, bucket, robin, paul, Richard, Darren, billy, josh and everyone else who ever recorded as GNR should be heard. The whole world may not care to hear it but I sure as fuck do. And to me that is all that matters... You release a GnR album I'm going to buy it. If you release new song on itunes I'm going to buy it. If you fucking leak it I'm going to listen to it...a hundred and fifty fucking times in a row. If you think you found a million dollars that someone else forgot...then good for you motherfucker, and share some of that shit with you buddies. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: westcoast_junkie on December 08, 2013, 01:57:18 AM Relevant rockmusic has always evolved around creative usage of new technology and many got a renewed intrest in gnr after Oh My God and Buckethead joined. So, many of us have diferent music-intrests here and I wonder how the next record gonna be. To me, adding Axl's voice on VR-songs would just be mediocre rockmusic with an exceptional voice. Axl voices on Buckethead's gems on the other hand...that sounds godlike to me. Good point. And I totally agree. Soothsayer + Axl = :drool: This whole what's a band discussion is just lame. Just go to a concert and see for yourself. In my band carrier we never got so far that we released anything. The guitarist and singer wrote the most of the music. Very little was invented from scratch with everyone gathered together. We still were a band... Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: lostdream on December 08, 2013, 05:45:49 AM But, anyway. It's impossible for GN'R to write as a band since it's been "decided" that they're not a band to begin with. :hihi: Amusing. /jarmo It?s NOT been "decided" that they are not a band. I just said they are only a touring band. To be a 100 % band it would help a LOT if the current line up released new music. I just don?t believe in "no critisism" when it comes to love or friendship. Even if the love is "only" about a band ;-) I expect my TRUE friends to tell me straight in my face when they think I behave like shit or to kick my ass when it?s needed. Because as I KNOW they are real friends, I know they want my best and don?t do it to bring me down. I have NEVER bashed that band - not in ANY line-up - I was always supportive. But that doesn?t mean I support each and every decision or behaviour. :) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 09, 2013, 09:18:05 AM What's the problem? November Rain was "too old" when it was released? Do you enjoy those Hollywood Rose tracks that appear on GN'R albums? Tracks written by a band that existed before GN'R... Oh no! The horror! Are you kidding me with this? 'November Rain' was a song the band had worked on for a few years. That band. The actual guys involved in the song. How the hell is that analogous to what's going on now? You might have a case if Axl showed up with a 'Shadow Of Your Love' with Tracii Guns and Rob Gardner and told the current band at the time it would be going on the album. But hey, if you have a riff you wanted to shoehorn over top of it, feel free. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 09, 2013, 10:16:15 AM What's the problem? November Rain was "too old" when it was released? Do you enjoy those Hollywood Rose tracks that appear on GN'R albums? Tracks written by a band that existed before GN'R... Oh no! The horror! Are you kidding me with this? 'November Rain' was a song the band had worked on for a few years. That band. The actual guys involved in the song. How the hell is that analogous to what's going on now? That band? Matt Sorum joined in 1990, the song was written way before that. So between the song being written, recorded for a demo and actual recording, the band's line up changed. Isn't that what the issue some of you have with GN'R is these days? Songs being written by people who aren't in the band anymore? You might have a case if Axl showed up with a 'Shadow Of Your Love' with Tracii Guns and Rob Gardner and told the current band at the time it would be going on the album. But hey, if you have a riff you wanted to shoehorn over top of it, feel free. Two different "issues". Songs written by people who aren't in the band instead of the current band, and songs written (and recorded) by people who aren't int he band. Do you object to Steven Adler playing drums on Civil War? ;) /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 09, 2013, 11:14:19 AM Jarmo, you have already told me, point blank, you don't see any problems or anything amiss about the fact the current band have yet to write anything together in almost a decade.
We likely aren't going to agree on much on this topic, given that "nothing to see here" mindset you constantly adapt to avoid having to say anything critical. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 09, 2013, 11:26:12 AM Jarmo, you have already told me, point blank, you don't see any problems or anything amiss about the fact the current band have yet to write anything together in almost a decade. We likely aren't going to agree on much on this topic, given that "nothing to see here" mindset you constantly adapt to avoid having to say anything critical. I would try not to debate anything with jarmo....I have bitten my tounge several time and not posted because ... well you gotta realize he may have started as a fan of GNR...but hes no longer a fan like the rest of us... he spends time with Axl Rose...he travels the world with him... what do you expect? for him to knock him or some of the practices by management ? I wouldnt either deep down he must find it maddening like the rest of us do that they cant seem to get anything out in a timely fashion....... but when hes rocking out backstage at the show.... he gets over that frustration real quick :) Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: JAEBALL on December 09, 2013, 11:28:32 AM Hopefully the "mygnr exclusive" has some legs...and kind of puts Ron's concerns to rest a little bit
and hopefully new songs are introduced as promised and hopefully the reception is all good and will hopefully lead Axl to explore new ideas for new stuff with the current guys Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 09, 2013, 11:30:48 AM Jarmo, you have already told me, point blank, you don't see any problems or anything amiss about the fact the current band have yet to write anything together in almost a decade. We likely aren't going to agree on much on this topic, given that "nothing to see here" mindset you constantly adapt to avoid having to say anything critical. I would try not to debate anything with jarmo....I have bitten my tounge several time and not posted because ... well you gotta realize he may have started as a fan of GNR...but hes no longer a fan like the rest of us... he spends time with Axl Rose...he travels the world with him... what do you expect? for him to knock him or some of the practices by management ? I wouldnt either Oh no, I agree with every word of that. He clearly knows where his bread is buttered, as we are not blind to that. But I will say that the long established picture of him at other boards as a guy that bounces anyone that does not tow the line is unfair. I don't think I'm a troll or disruptive for its own sake, but I'm hardly a team player and he lets me speak my mind. I got no quarrel with the guy. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 09, 2013, 11:37:16 AM Jarmo, you have already told me, point blank, you don't see any problems or anything amiss about the fact the current band have yet to write anything together in almost a decade. You're right. It's not a "problem". They don't need to write or record anything for me. If they do it for themselves, awesome! But I don't sit and complain about it on the Internet. Doesn't do anything for me. Sorry. /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 09, 2013, 11:43:10 AM Jarmo, you have already told me, point blank, you don't see any problems or anything amiss about the fact the current band have yet to write anything together in almost a decade. You're right. It's not a "problem". They don't need to write or record anything for me. If they do it for themselves, awesome! But I don't sit and complain about it on the Internet. Doesn't do anything for me. Sorry. Than why ever comment on anything that happens in any phase of life, ever? You constantly want to attach all these nefarious motives to people simply having a conversation about the state of affairs. To you, one fan telling another fan you wish they were more accessible or were quicker with a new album is not just a conversation between fellow fans. It is one "complainer" talking to another "complainer" about "what they feel they are owed" and they "obviously are never going to be happy". What a dim view of humankind. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 09, 2013, 11:58:40 AM I never stated anything like that. That's your assumption. Somewhat insulting, but what's new? As soon as people run out of answers, they go the personal route "oh but you're this and that"....
If you honestly believe that, maybe you see everything in black and white? Which would be unfortunate. Do you seriously claim that there aren't certain fans who will complain no matter what? Some people are like that, nothing I can do about it. They live among us. But I'm not gonna sit and let them think they are a "right". Right, isn't the word. What I mean is, there's a different point of view that people sometimes forget exists if they are constantly bombarded with the same negative opinions day after day. I don't like to be surrounded by people who are only negative and offer nothing constructive. Do you? I'm sorry. Yeah, on a sunny day, they might be the most supportive fans on the planet (when they get what they demand), but once the novelty wears off, they're back to their old habits. I don't necessarily understand that. Oh, and I get wanting new things. It's human. But it doesn't have to be this negative thing.... :) /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 09, 2013, 01:00:20 PM Do you seriously claim that there aren't certain fans who will complain no matter what? As you and Team Brazil define the term? I don't see that as complaining. Quick example. Fernando's last announcement that there might someday be an announcement. Many people had some fun with that, due to both its vauge tone and their track record. But I would not call it complaining, more like breaking balls. Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 09, 2013, 01:18:33 PM As you and Team Brazil define the term? I don't see that as complaining. Only speaking for myself, but my definition of complaining is what I learned in school. Hasn't changed over the years. :) Quick example. Fernando's last announcement that there might someday be an announcement. Many people had some fun with that, due to both its vauge tone and their track record. But I would not call it complaining, more like breaking balls. Is that what it is? Just a way to have fun and pass time? /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 09, 2013, 01:26:44 PM Is that what it is? Just a way to have fun and pass time? Mostly, yeah. Not everything is an evil plot by "the haters". Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: jarmo on December 09, 2013, 01:35:34 PM Is that what it is? Just a way to have fun and pass time? Mostly, yeah. Not everything is an evil plot by "the haters". Sure. But what's the purpose? To amuse the original poster? What good comes out of it? To me, most of it is just disruptive and not constructive in any way.... /jarmo Title: Re: Bumbelfoot Interview (Talks GN?R) Post by: D-GenerationX on December 13, 2013, 02:02:58 AM Is that what it is? Just a way to have fun and pass time? Mostly, yeah. Not everything is an evil plot by "the haters". Sure. But what's the purpose? To amuse the original poster? What good comes out of it? To me, most of it is just disruptive and not constructive in any way.... All it is, is talking about the goings on of our common interest. Just conversation about what goes on. If we didn't really and truly care, we wouldn't talk about it as much as we do. And we all want to see good things, ultimately. |