Title: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: D on January 31, 2010, 09:32:42 PM Note the "Official" so no one steal it please
Grammy's suck music industry blame downloading but just take a look at the "best" of music and that is why your sales are down fuckers. The shit sucks Pink was great but the rest has been shit Only watching to see what Bon Jovi perform Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: faldor on January 31, 2010, 11:42:13 PM Bon Jovi should've dropped "Who Says You Can't Go Home" and played all of "Living On A Prayer". That was lame, they had America vote for a song and they played ONE verse. The show was about as awful as I expected. Not sure why I keep coming back each year.
Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: FunkyMonkey on January 31, 2010, 11:48:29 PM From Trent Reznor:
The Grammys = the old guard / old media propping up their puppets trying to convince the outside world (and each other) they're relevant. 7:56 PM Jan 30th from Tweetie Note the "Official" so no one steal it please :D Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: GypsySoul on January 31, 2010, 11:54:07 PM I thought that Eminem and Lil' Wayne and the other gentleman (sorry, I don't know who that was) performance was excellent!!! By far the best (if not only good) performance of the night. : ok:
Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: faldor on January 31, 2010, 11:56:29 PM I thought that Eminem and Lil' Wayne and the other gentleman (sorry, I don't know who that was) performance was excellent!!! By far the best (if not only good) performance of the night. : ok: Were they swearing every other word during that performance or was there just a problem with my feed? There were lots of muted parts during that song.Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: GypsySoul on February 01, 2010, 12:04:35 AM Yeah. It must have been on time-delay so CBS could censor the curses out. FAA regulations. :-\
I wonder if the iTunes/Target version is censored also? Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: faldor on February 01, 2010, 12:06:52 AM I figured that was the case. If they knew they were going to be censored, couldn't they have picked a more appropriate song so you could understand what they're rapping about?
Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: D on February 01, 2010, 12:31:52 AM oh yeah the Eminem,Lil Wayne Drake performance was AMAZING
Bon Jovi did really well and put on what I consider the third best performance of the night behind only 1.Lil Wayne,Em and Drake 2. Pink 3. Bon Jovi Jeff Beck is phenomenal Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: GypsySoul on February 01, 2010, 12:37:48 AM Roberta Flack's voice is as beautiful as ever, too. :)
Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: Naupis on February 01, 2010, 01:00:39 AM Quote Jeff Beck is phenomenal These were Slash's Tweet's during the show: Les Paul. 93 years on planet earth, most of it dedicated to making music & all he gets is a 2 minute tribute. Not to mention I would have liked to have heard/seen Jeff play a little longer. Slash apparently agreed with you about Jeff Beck being awesome. Wish Bon Jovi would have played Always. I knew they would end up playing LOAP, but Always is probably my favorite Bon Jovi song, and one of my favorite songs period. I also think it is much better live than in the studio. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: Genesis on February 01, 2010, 03:57:41 AM Interesting. A R Rahman won two grammys. Not that any of you care, of course.
Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: D on February 01, 2010, 04:30:29 PM Yeah me and other BJ fans were voting the shit out of "Always"
really didn't want to hear LOAP for the 9 millionth time. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: LunsJail on February 01, 2010, 05:18:27 PM Yeah me and other BJ fans were voting the shit out of "Always" really didn't want to hear LOAP for the 9 millionth time. That thing was so set up for LOAP to win. I wonder if they even bothered rehearsing the other songs. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: faldor on February 01, 2010, 11:48:42 PM Yeah me and other BJ fans were voting the shit out of "Always" really didn't want to hear LOAP for the 9 millionth time. That thing was so set up for LOAP to win. I wonder if they even bothered rehearsing the other songs. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: cotis on February 03, 2010, 12:42:22 AM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq4UUdLGXTs
great performance and I don't like rap. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on February 03, 2010, 05:10:11 AM I would like for someone to explain to me what made that performance so great, because I did not see any redeeming qualities in that performance.
K thanks. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: faldor on February 03, 2010, 08:50:24 AM I would like for someone to explain to me what made that performance so great, because I did not see any redeeming qualities in that performance. I agree. I can't see how anyone could possibly think that was great. They bleeped out ten second blocks every 30 seconds, you couldn't understand a thing they were rapping about. I don't understand, the performers knew they were gonna be censored. The grammy's knew they were going to have to censor them. You'd think they could've come to an agreement on a more suitable song with less curse words.K thanks. I mean, I'm sure it was a great performance. But it would've been nice to HEAR it. Visually it was good, I guess. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: cotis on February 03, 2010, 09:07:40 AM IF you watch the video there is no bleeping :)
Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: faldor on February 03, 2010, 09:10:10 AM IF you watch the video there is no bleeping :) Yeah I thought about that after I posted, the video might actually be uncensored. Alright, so maybe that one is a good performance. I don't have the urge to watch it. But the censored version that made it to air. That one, I don't get.Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: CheapJon on February 03, 2010, 09:47:50 AM can really something involving lil wayne be viewed as a great performance? and i like rap
lady gaga and elton john though, gets the thumbs up : ok: haven't seen pink yet Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: GypsySoul on February 03, 2010, 12:09:40 PM lady gaga and elton john though, gets the thumbs up : ok: When Elton did that with GNR, it was GREAT!!! When Elton did that with Eminem, it was really good. Even though Elton n' Lady GaGa did a nice job with that, I think this whole "Elton and the latest controversial performer" bit is getting old already. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: CheapJon on February 03, 2010, 12:18:45 PM lady gaga and elton john though, gets the thumbs up : ok: When Elton did that with GNR, it was GREAT!!! When Elton did that with Eminem, it was really good. Even though Elton n' Lady GaGa did a nice job with that, I think this whole "Elton and the latest controversial performer" bit is getting old already. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: GypsySoul on February 03, 2010, 12:28:41 PM yes they are all controversial i guess, but they are all very talented too, and that's the way i see it.. I used to think that lady gaga was just another product from record companys to make money but I looked into it and i was wrong, she's a real talent as well Yeah. I completely agree.My point was more about how they really need to find another (new) way to showcase Elton John. I mean he's currently involved with so many other great projects like broadway shows and movie scores/soundtracks that you'd think they'd focus more on that instead of having him do this same old bit over and over. The performance itself was very good. I just think the whole concept is overdone now. Title: Re: OFFICIAL 2010 Grammy's Post by: maynard on February 04, 2010, 12:13:07 AM I just saw slash playing the last NR solo with great artists T-Pain and Jamie Fox. I felt sorry for Slash but hey, he's making money, maybe it's what he really cares. At least, Axl has integrity. Pathetic.
|