|
Title: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Rhino on August 26, 2009, 10:14:37 AM This post is in reaction to the recent rumor resurgence of an Appetite Era guns reunion.
First, off I love new guns, ChiDem is right uop there with Guns best work ever and alot of it is, its unreal. That being said Id love to see the original guns get back together (axl, Slash, Duff, Izzy, Steven) and live happily ever after. But c'mon , it sounds great in theory but its self destructive in reality. a lot of fans act like little kids who want their divorced parents to get back together. Appetite for destruction was not just an album title it was a true story. Guys, one thing is obvious even if there was a reunion i think its almost certain it wouldn't last long, personality wise, these guys have been doomed since 1987 or even before. It's cruel irony at its best...Cant be the best band ever because they are apart but cant stay together to be the best band ever. If it happened alot of you would end up more pissed off then ever and there would be no more guns n roses at all in any form ever again. Would you be willing to end guns for ever for what would probably be a 12 month tour that wound most likely end up with 5 guys hating each other more than ever and maybe even end up killing some of them. Guns was what it was "the best Fuckin rock n roll band to ever hit a stage". Let that rest in peace. Guns is now a Kick ass rock n roll band. It will never be the same again but it's sure as hell better than anything else out there now. As long as Axl and the boys keep rockin I'll be happy. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: MeanBone on August 26, 2009, 10:21:27 AM dead horse anyone? :yes:
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: horsey on August 26, 2009, 11:05:38 AM i can see it happening being as they have grow up alot.people change with age and less partying going on.slash is sober and i think duff is too.the only one i would worry about would be steven still fucked up on something.i think a possible reuinion would be great.one can still have hope and i still think it could happen.only time will tell.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Albert S Miller on August 26, 2009, 11:08:34 AM dead horse anyone? :yes: Absolutely Dead Horse :yes: Jarmo's turn ;).Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: ppbebe on August 26, 2009, 11:11:18 AM i believe they've grown up so that re-thing wouldn't work.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: russtcb on August 26, 2009, 11:15:25 AM This post is in reaction to the recent rumor resurgence of an Appetite Era guns reunion. Oh sweet, I was dying for your reaction to a rumor you're making up. :hihi: Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Rhino on August 26, 2009, 11:27:48 AM Yah sure I made that up???, dude this talk has obviously been going on for years, but just recently ive heard it making the rounds quite a bit. Im just saying I seriously don't think there is any truth to this round or rumors at all and that's why.
I havn't seen an interesting post about Guns N Roses in this section in months just wanted to spark some conversation on the recent rumors. I appoligise maybe you rather talk about illegal downloading or Bumbelfoot commenting on things he cant comment on. Or maby we can talk about old axl pictures! Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: ppbebe on August 26, 2009, 11:30:56 AM whatever. sorry reunioinsts it will never happen or work.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: horsey on August 26, 2009, 11:35:03 AM you know it's been a rumor but now seems closer then ever.if you were a fan from back then ,you would understand.it would be great to see that and have a great band back.so no negativaty please it just makes you look like you weren't a fan from the begining.sorta bandwagoner such.but i was there i know what it was like,maybe the bad will out do the old stuff.and good can come from it,ever think it could be.then let a person speak then don't crush dreams please.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: DeN on August 26, 2009, 11:43:15 AM ?There?s zero possibility of me having anything to do with Slash other than by ambush, and that wouldn?t be pretty,?
?Slash either should not have been in Guns to begin with or should have left after Lies. In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided?and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better.? Axl Rose 2009 that was pretty clear to me. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: ppbebe on August 26, 2009, 12:55:27 PM clear to us. Unfortunately it appears that no word is 'harsh' enough to bring these reunionists to their senses.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: russtcb on August 26, 2009, 02:39:12 PM Yah sure I made that up???, dude this talk has obviously been going on for years, but just recently ive heard it making the rounds quite a bit. Im just saying I seriously don't think there is any truth to this round or rumors at all and that's why. I havn't seen an interesting post about Guns N Roses in this section in months just wanted to spark some conversation on the recent rumors. I appoligise maybe you rather talk about illegal downloading or Bumbelfoot commenting on things he cant comment on. Or maby we can talk about old axl pictures! Talks been going on for years with no facts to base it on whatsoever so yes, I'm sure you made it up. : ok: Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 26, 2009, 09:03:51 PM i believe they've grown up so that re-thing wouldn't work. Agreed there all doing their own thing now you honestly believed that rumor when Axl is getting ready for a tour, Slash is trying to finish up Slash And Friends, Steven is most likely working on his recording for his new album with Adler's Appetite, Duff is touring with Loaded I think, and I have no clue what Izzy is up to but I bet its a new album or something like that but one day when they all realize they all wont live forever and miss what they did with Appetite (when there like 60 or perhaps older) they just might do a reunion tour and be cool with each other but that's only a theory Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 26, 2009, 09:05:00 PM ?There?s zero possibility of me having anything to do with Slash other than by ambush, and that wouldn?t be pretty,? I don't remember him saying that in 2009 i thought that was from a while back?Slash either should not have been in Guns to begin with or should have left after Lies. In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided?and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better.? Axl Rose 2009 that was pretty clear to me. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 26, 2009, 09:06:34 PM you know it's been a rumor but now seems closer then ever.if you were a fan from back then ,you would understand.it would be great to see that and have a great band back.so no negativaty please it just makes you look like you weren't a fan from the begining.sorta bandwagoner such.but i was there i know what it was like,maybe the bad will out do the old stuff.and good can come from it,ever think it could be.then let a person speak then don't crush dreams please. true so true if they don't like it then don't come to the Dead Horse Section!!!!!!Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: ppbebe on August 27, 2009, 05:04:03 PM you know it's been a rumor but now seems closer then ever.if you were a fan from back then ,you would understand.it would be great to see that and have a great band back.so no negativaty please it just makes you look like you weren't a fan from the begining.sorta bandwagoner such.but i was there i know what it was like,maybe the bad will out do the old stuff.and good can come from it,ever think it could be.then let a person speak then don't crush dreams please. so you're saying the diehards since 2003/4 ish are band wagonners? bs. who cares if you got into the band early or late. Whether or not you are for the band right now matters. and wishing reunion now is not really supporting the band. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: gilld1 on August 27, 2009, 10:37:18 PM you know it's been a rumor but now seems closer then ever.if you were a fan from back then ,you would understand.it would be great to see that and have a great band back.so no negativaty please it just makes you look like you weren't a fan from the begining.sorta bandwagoner such.but i was there i know what it was like,maybe the bad will out do the old stuff.and good can come from it,ever think it could be.then let a person speak then don't crush dreams please. so you're saying the diehards since 2003/4 ish are band wagonners? bs. who cares if you got into the band early or late. Whether or not you are for the band right now matters. and wishing reunion now is not really supporting the band. Depends on which band you're talking about. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 27, 2009, 10:38:58 PM you know it's been a rumor but now seems closer then ever.if you were a fan from back then ,you would understand.it would be great to see that and have a great band back.so no negativaty please it just makes you look like you weren't a fan from the begining.sorta bandwagoner such.but i was there i know what it was like,maybe the bad will out do the old stuff.and good can come from it,ever think it could be.then let a person speak then don't crush dreams please. so you're saying the diehards since 2003/4 ish are band wagonners? bs. who cares if you got into the band early or late. Whether or not you are for the band right now matters. and wishing reunion now is not really supporting the band. Depends on which band you're talking about. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: icpillusions on August 27, 2009, 11:15:14 PM I would love to see the "originals" together for one show. Since I missed out on it because I was too young to go to a show. I know it's selfish but it would be like an orgasim seeing them playing together live.
I would also like to see the lineup with Buckethead. My show was cancelled during that era. I would love to hear him playing his parts live off of CD. I'm a fan of all the members past and present and would just love to see all the lineups at least once. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 27, 2009, 11:43:50 PM I would love to see the "originals" together for one show. Since I missed out on it because I was too young to go to a show. I know it's selfish but it would be like an orgasim seeing them playing together live. I know all to well how you feel I have never seen GN'R live at all if they reunited I would crap my pants no joke but that wont happen :( so best to go on with the New GN'RI would also like to see the lineup with Buckethead. My show was cancelled during that era. I would love to hear him playing his parts live off of CD. I'm a fan of all the members past and present and would just love to see all the lineups at least once. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: horsey on August 29, 2009, 12:03:14 AM lemme clear things up.when i was at hammersteins in ny.this guy didn't even know slash was isn't in the band anymore or even the break up.you call that possible ?
i found more kids growing into g n ' r fans thats kool but there are many who don't have a clue.and that my fan friends is what im talking about bandwagoners really.it was upsetting how the guy at the concert was making it to the point i was going to say something to him.not to ruin it for others who know new g n ' r music.to give it a chance. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jim Bob on August 29, 2009, 02:19:14 AM a lot of fans act like little kids who want their divorced parents to get back together. Thats a good analogy. Do you know anyone who still dwells on their parents divorce 15 years after the fact? :P Mine were divorced back in 1994 and I accepted it then and there. My parents have both moved on and married other people. Certain fans should do the same! Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Albert S Miller on August 29, 2009, 01:11:29 PM a lot of fans act like little kids who want their divorced parents to get back together. Thats a good analogy. Do you know anyone who still dwells on their parents divorce 15 years after the fact? :P Mine were divorced back in 1994 and I accepted it then and there. My parents have both moved on and married other people. Certain fans should do the same! Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: ppbebe on August 29, 2009, 01:32:46 PM lemme clear things up.when i was at hammersteins in ny.this guy didn't even know slash was isn't in the band anymore or even the break up.you call that possible ? i found more kids growing into g n ' r fans thats kool but there are many who don't have a clue.and that my fan friends is what im talking about bandwagoners really.it was upsetting how the guy at the concert was making it to the point i was going to say something to him. and do those 'bandwagoners' have their say about this topic or have anything to do with it? :confused: hammerstein was more than 3 years ago. i think it's just great that GNR keeps winning new fans. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 29, 2009, 03:37:53 PM lemme clear things up.when i was at hammersteins in ny.this guy didn't even know slash was isn't in the band anymore or even the break up.you call that possible ? Agreed the kids today dont know shit about GN'R but a small minority of us do and are gonna have the Patience to let things happen as they go with GN'Ri found more kids growing into g n ' r fans thats kool but there are many who don't have a clue.and that my fan friends is what im talking about bandwagoners really.it was upsetting how the guy at the concert was making it to the point i was going to say something to him.not to ruin it for others who know new g n ' r music.to give it a chance. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: horsey on August 30, 2009, 12:22:23 PM don't get me wrong but what i said is not really the whole thing.i think the internet fans rock more then the ones who have no clue.and wear the shirts and you say ''hey you r a g n r fan,an they say no i just like the shirt''.that is my very point and happens alot.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on August 30, 2009, 12:34:30 PM don't get me wrong but what i said is not really the whole thing.i think the internet fans rock more then the ones who have no clue.and wear the shirts and you say ''hey you r a g n r fan,an they say no i just like the shirt''.that is my very point and happens alot. I see yeah those people piss me off to if you are gonna wear a shirt of a band the least they could do is look into the band even a littleTitle: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: estebanf on August 31, 2009, 07:20:24 PM mmhhh... I dont want a reunion... this lineup sounds 10x better than any of the 1986-1993 ones and they got a much more wide and opened musical range.
not to mention I dont want to see Axl Rose along with the people who ''did everything they could [RIRIII]'' to destroy the band we all care and love. To me, reunion means Robin. Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: HBK on August 31, 2009, 10:13:52 PM Reunion, Who ?
:rofl: Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: ppbebe on September 06, 2009, 12:25:28 PM the sooner you realize there will never be a sorry ass reunion the better.
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Albert S Miller on September 10, 2009, 11:11:04 AM ^Well said ppbebe :yes:. It gets ridiculous doesn't it?
Title: Re: Its better to have Rocked then to have never Rocked at all Post by: Jdog0830 on September 10, 2009, 07:21:42 PM ^Well said ppbebe :yes:. It gets ridiculous doesn't it? Wow I thought you were a person that at least wanted this to happen well not now but like 10 or 15 years later kinda like me |