Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Guns N' Roses => Guns N' Roses => Topic started by: FunkyMonkey on February 27, 2009, 10:09:23 AM



Title: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: FunkyMonkey on February 27, 2009, 10:09:23 AM
Axl Rose Insists Original Guns N' Roses Lineup Is Dead and Buried

Since releasing the long-awaited Guns N' Roses album 'Chinese Democracy' this past November, Axl Rose has said very little about it, taking to message boards and e-mails for the few comments he has made. But if there's one person who could get him to break his silence it's Del James, Rose's longtime friend, road manager and the man whose short story, 'Without You,' inspired the epic clip for 'November Rain.'

James, a music journalist who has covered G N' R for years, dating back to his days at metal mag Rip, as well as in several Rolling Stone articles, spoke with Rose and is sharing the results of that one-on-one exclusively with Spinner. Yes, here he is, W. Axl Rose, letting loose on Slash, answering whether he was trying to make the best album ever and waxing philosophically on when the original G N' R lineup really died.

Del James: As reported, were you, either in your mind or otherwise, trying to create the "best album ever made"?

Axl Rose: No. That's f---ing ridiculous and more negative media nonsense. We were all just trying to do our best for the fans and ourselves.

At any point did you feel or say either you or the band had to make a "masterpiece"?

Of course not -- more unaccountable nonsense. Obviously, media, elements of the public, fans and our detractors had all kinds of things going on such as high hopes, expectations, pressure, naysayers, etc. I don't think anyone would mind discovering a diamond mine and I don't think anyone in any competitive field would get very far if they didn't have dreams, aspirations or simply hope to do well. That said, these types of comments are more from our detractors, pulled out of their ass if not thin air.

Do you feel that your alleged sense of perfectionism has delayed the release of the album?

No. Guns in any lineup wasn't going to release anything all that great any sooner. And no matter how any of us tried, that didn't happen, and often while any number of us were pushing to try and do so with whatever we had going at the time. In regard to so-called perfectionism, I feel that has a lot to do with your goals or requirements with whatever one's doing or creating. Different levels may be required for different objectives. If you're making brakes for a vehicle, what's required? It's all relative, right? You try to make the best calls you can at any given moment and go from there. Generally, when this term is used by others in regard to me or how I work, it's said in a negative way or as an excuse for their shortcomings -- and again by my detractors. Whether they are open about such or not, some people love putting others in a negative light; helps them feel better about themselves. Too many ears and too many stupid comments have proven that.

Did you break up the old Guns?

It is my belief that the commitment to end old Guns came long before the band started in the heart and soul of one man. After that, it became more visible sometime before/during [the 'Use Your Illusion' albums], when the others opted for personal reasons to change our approach, styles and methods of working together. At the time, I unwittingly chose as a means of what I felt was both my own and Guns' survival to adapt, and threw myself into whatever I could get out of that to support and promote our efforts.

The group shot of the band in front of the piece 'Dead' was not a coincidence but not something I felt could be talked about openly, and something I hoped would change. I couldn't reach Izzy [Stradlin] and couldn't manage or curtail Slash and his personal objectives to take over Guns anymore than I did at the time, and I'm lucky to have survived, got what we did out of it and some still enjoyed the results. But for all intents and purposes, the 'Appetite [for Destruction]' lineup and approach was already dead, and with the addition of Matt [Sorum], the end of the then-lineup and what Guns was really about was only a matter of time. Only heartfelt choices by the others could or would change that. Unfortunately, nothing did.

I'm generally blamed for the time it took to release 'Illusions,' but again the reality of my fault would be in not finding a way to manage Slash complete with his addictions and bring both him and Izzy together either similar to 'Appetite' or in some other progression more conducive to Guns than how 'Illusions' was accomplished. Unfortunately, that never truly happened, and both Guns and the public suffered for it. I'll take the responsibility in the sense that had I known how to achieve those goals we would have made what I feel would've been a more effective and powerful album at the time.

See? There's the catch, right? All this time, most thought I changed the direction with 'Illusions.' A lot of nonsense theories, speculation and complete nonrealities put together by others, based on Slash and others' crap and off one interview taken out of context I did with Kurt Loder where I said I hated 'Appetite.' That sentence has been used and twisted in every conceivable way since to vilify me and purports to prove my guilt and responsibility, when I wasn't speaking to the music itself but the overwhelming and at that time seemingly drowning success of our record.

My statement was in specific response to the feelings I had listening to DJs at the L.A. hard rock station KNAC at the time complaining about having to play the entire record for the umpteenth time for fans. I simply wanted to make another record and have it be as good or better. If you don't think I would've liked to have five 'Appetites' and been living like the Stones at the time, you're high. With that, any other avenue I hoped to pursue musically would more than likely been available as well. This was something I could never get through to the others with. Personal need to dominate in Guns was very important to them. Izzy has to be in charge or he's not comfortable, same with Slash. Duff [McKagan] tries convincing himself he's equal partners with Slash. Each to their own.

Why didn't you write 'Appetite'-style songs yourself then?

Part of what destroyed Guns was the battle between those guitars that works so well for 'Appetite.' I have no concept how to duplicate that with either the old guys or anyone else. I liked it then but can't say I truly understood their nature as I feel I do now. Make no mistake: That was a war and the efforts of one man to "successfully" remove another in his path between him and I. Neither player wants to deal with each other in those ways again. Those battles have already been fought, both sides went their prospective ways. Regardless of if they were to work together or not, the true dynamics of back then aren't something Izzy has an interest in or would allow himself to actually be in to such a degree other than for appearances, if that. Also, anything I had written I felt was in similar directions then, during and after the 'Illusions' tour was more than rejected by both Slash and Duff at a time, which greatly helped destroy whatever confidence I may have had at the time.

Why so many guitars on 'Chinese Democracy'?

Why not?

Seriously, past Guns records have only two. Why did you feel the need for more on this endeavor?

I understand it's for whatever reason a bit of a challenge for most people to feel comfortable in their minds with any band having more than two guitarists, but technically, as far as our recording goes, we're a bit more alike with the older recordings than one might think. On the older records, though, it's very distinct that there are generally two guitar parts -- each part is actually performed and recorded twice, giving a fuller sound, so in effect you have four guitars. Leads and fills are another pass, and often songs were originally written and demos were done with other guitarists as well.

On 'Chinese,' instead of having the same player double his part, we chose to add another voice and either each player's own take on the part or their take of another's, then there's leads and fills which vary from one person or a few on a track. Also on this record, though, you may have one player playing more than one part in a section; they generally tend to be two distinct parts and not overdubs or harmonizing with their own leads or fills. No way is better than another; it's just whatever works for what you're trying to do, what you personally want or for whatever reason you feel you either need, choose or like.

For this record, I wanted a blend of different-style sounds and approaches; some at least a bit unique to the individual players and their takes on these songs. I feel the different personalities and techniques give the material its own sense of originality. Live, I prefer the more solid approach of the three guitars now, especially as the performances with the rhythm are more energetic, consistent and reliable. It was fun having Izzy on board a bit adding yet another voice to the mix and seemed to work better for the songs this way, as opposed to having him by himself.

Continue reading here:

http://www.spinner.com/2009/02/27/axl-rose-insists-original-guns-n-roses-lineup-is-dead-and-burie/



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 10:24:21 AM
Thanks for posting! :D


/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: +Rocker+ on February 27, 2009, 10:27:19 AM
Woau!!
Axl really is speaking....


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: seely on February 27, 2009, 10:35:18 AM
Awesome, ggreat stuff!

No news on a new album or tour yet though  :'(


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LIGuns on February 27, 2009, 10:41:08 AM
Wow that was......interesting.....
Bent Brother 2night on Long Island, anyone going?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Nytunz on February 27, 2009, 10:47:05 AM
Now this was interesting read!

Cool interview... Cleared up a bit around the Robin situation also... Brain also working on guns stuff  :D


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 10:49:36 AM
Some more fascinating stuff there.  Is this issue out now?  Next week?  Will he be/is he on the cover?  Or is this just for the web?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 10:57:25 AM
I wouldn't even hate to see 2 drum sets on stage. :P

Thanks funky I'm reading it now.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: falungong69 on February 27, 2009, 10:58:22 AM
fuck yes.  that's why i love axl.  he cuts straight through the bullshit and lays it right out there...  slash is a cancer.  he is a media whore.  he tried to take over guns n' roses.  and worst of all, he hasn't made any good music.

i'm also glad axl decided to speak truthfully about robert john too.  i think a lot of fans were wondering what the situation was there.  what a shame that he gave up gnr to be a junkie loser meth addict.  i wish axl could work with people who truly appreciated what a gift it is to be part of the gnr family, instead of all these junkies and losers of the past.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GnR-NOW on February 27, 2009, 11:02:48 AM
It's so awesome Axl is opening up. It's ashame that the press basically placed all the blame on him not knowing the facts. I'm sure we all have been a part of something that was percieved great, but behind the scenes we couldn't stand being there.

I would love to hear more new material, but Axl's right, if you don't like CD then you won't like where they take it from there. If you love CD and know the current players, I think you could really love the material, and in its own way is just as good as anything from the past..

If people can stop expecting AFD, and appreciate the guitar playing and effort put into CD, then they will like it.

Heres to hopefully touring this year  :beer:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AC on February 27, 2009, 11:03:10 AM
"If you don't think I would've liked to have five 'Appetites' and been living like the Stones at the time, you're high."

One word: Awesome!

AA.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 11:05:21 AM
I know I'm going to get jumped on for this but here goes.  To me, this was another interesting read that did absolutely nothing to promote Chinese Democracy.  More "Slash is a cancer" crap that has nothing to do with the new album. This time he even went so far as to suggest that Slash wasn't a good guitar player, even on Appetite.

For example, it would have been cool to hear about how a song like Better was constructed.  Instead, we get a paragraph about how Robert John is a drug addict.  Am I the only one who didn't really care what Robert John was up to these days?

But in Axl's own words, this is GNR and not Burger King.  You can't always get what you want.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 11:06:19 AM
Thanks, FunkyMonkey.

Even though 99% of whatever Axl is talking about went waaaay over my head.  :-[


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Thorazine Shuffle on February 27, 2009, 11:10:38 AM
My firewall at the office won't allow me to access the link.

Can someone copy and paste the entire article here?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 11:12:16 AM
My firewall at the office won't allow me to access the link.

Can someone copy and paste the entire article here?

Admin posted it here:

http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=56089.0


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 11:14:30 AM
I love this quote
"In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided -- and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better."


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Thorazine Shuffle on February 27, 2009, 11:21:04 AM
My firewall at the office won't allow me to access the link.

Can someone copy and paste the entire article here?

Admin posted it here:

http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=56089.0

Awesome.  Thank you.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on February 27, 2009, 11:23:37 AM
I love this quote
"In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided -- and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better."
same here man! i'll save that one ;D

but I do hate the man, i mean come one, he can't tell me there's probably meaner and darker things coming, and that there's an awesome solo, he should have just said nothing  ;) :rofl:

who's pod?

also laughing about his comment on how much baz think he has heard :hihi:

coolio 'bout brain too


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 11:25:11 AM
who's pod?


My guess is Chris Vrenna....




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 11:26:48 AM
I know I'm going to get jumped on for this but here goes.  To me, this was another interesting read that did absolutely nothing to promote Chinese Democracy.  More "Slash is a cancer" crap that has nothing to do with the new album. This time he even went so far as to suggest that Slash wasn't a good guitar player, even on Appetite.

For example, it would have been cool to hear about how a song like Better was constructed.  Instead, we get a paragraph about how Robert John is a drug addict.  Am I the only one who didn't really care what Robert John was up to these days?

But in Axl's own words, this is GNR and not Burger King.  You can't always get what you want.
I don't think he was saying Slash wasn't a good guitar player, just that he prefers guitarists that challenge themselves.  I get your point about the Slash bashing vs. talking about CD.  But maybe he feels he needs to clear the air first.  Get all that stuff off his chest and then he'll talk about the music.  We'll see.  He talked about the music in the online forums.  These are a little more condensed and you know the media cares more about the relationship with Slash then how they came up with "Better", unfortunately.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: daviebuckethead on February 27, 2009, 11:27:35 AM
I know I'm going to get jumped on for this but here goes.  To me, this was another interesting read that did absolutely nothing to promote Chinese Democracy.  More "Slash is a cancer" crap that has nothing to do with the new album. This time he even went so far as to suggest that Slash wasn't a good guitar player, even on Appetite.

For example, it would have been cool to hear about how a song like Better was constructed.  Instead, we get a paragraph about how Robert John is a drug addict.  Am I the only one who didn't really care what Robert John was up to these days?

But in Axl's own words, this is GNR and not Burger King.  You can't always get what you want.

Amen.........more bitter rhetoric.......I like Axl, he's my favourite singer, but bloody hell lets use the brain already. Bashing individuals (regardless if you believe they deserve it), isn't going to win over the public or promote your new album, it just backs up mass opinion that he's a bitter, twisted, has been. (which pains me to say).

Also, via axl's statements recently, i think we know why the process of writing and recording an album took as long as it did. I think he needs to take a step back in regard to the legalities, politics, and business part of guns n roses, he seems to get so immersed in it that he has no time for anything else, and ultimately gets massively frustrated.

I think its great that an artist want to be invovled in every facet of what goes on, but there has to be a point where he lets "his people" do their job (because it sounds like they sit around doing nothing while axl does all the running), and he ends up re-running the same convoluted process over and over wondering why!?

Even though 99% of whatever Axl is talking about went waaaay over my head.  :-[

i agree, what the fuck was all that pish about robert john, and how is it relevant or even remotely interesting to anybody, besides Axls lawyer and accountant! talking in riddles to try and sound intelligent, and avoid litigation most of the time i think. Which again highlights his obsession with the law.

i will be bashed all over for this, and like axl, "i dont care". GNR are my favourite band, past and present, i like both Axl and Slash in equal measure as they are both tremondous singer AND guitarists respectively. i just wish axl would foucs on the music, the promotion and being a rock star, opposed to being a suit.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 11:27:48 AM
Del is such a great writer. This article is epic.I will always be happy that I met him in front of the JOINT in Las Vegas. I'll never forget meeting this really nice lady IN LA. Her name was Avery and she called herself the Malibu psychic. I asked her if she knew Axl , and she said that Axl was a very nice man and that the media had totally misrepresented him. I also met Robert John at my first GNR concert in Las Vegas. He was so mean to me that I almost burst into tears. The good thing is that when I saw him the next day I ran the other way and that is how I ended up meeting Buckethead. Is this article going to be published in ROLLING STONE?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Aussie_Axe on February 27, 2009, 11:30:17 AM
good to hear from axl again, some interesting things were said, maybe alittle harsh on slash  :no:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 11:31:00 AM
Amen.........more bitter rhetoric......

So predictable.

I knew this was gonna happen once Axl decided to speak out.

For years we've heard the other side of the argument. Axl kept quiet.

Now when he comments on it, he's bitter?  ::)

I guess Slash has been openly bitter since 1996 then? That's how long he's been talking about Axl and GN'R for!






/jarmo



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: daviebuckethead on February 27, 2009, 11:31:21 AM
Del is such a great writer. This article is epic.I will always be happy that i met him in fron of the JOINT in Las Vegas. I'll never forget meeting this really nice lady IN LA. Her name was Avery and she called herself the Malibu psychic. I asked her if she knew Axl , and she said that Axl was a very nice man and that the media had totally misprepresented him. I also met Robert John at my first GNR concert in Las Vegas. He was so mean to me that I almost burst into tears. The good thing is that when I saw him the next day I ran the other way and that is how I ended up meeting Buckethead. Is this article going to be published in ROLLING STONE?

gotta love the sarcasm


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 11:31:48 AM
I know I'm going to get jumped on for this but here goes.  To me, this was another interesting read that did absolutely nothing to promote Chinese Democracy.  More "Slash is a cancer" crap that has nothing to do with the new album. This time he even went so far as to suggest that Slash wasn't a good guitar player, even on Appetite.

For example, it would have been cool to hear about how a song like Better was constructed.  Instead, we get a paragraph about how Robert John is a drug addict.  Am I the only one who didn't really care what Robert John was up to these days?

But in Axl's own words, this is GNR and not Burger King.  You can't always get what you want.
I don't think he was saying Slash wasn't a good guitar player, just that he prefers guitarists that challenge themselves.  I get your point about the Slash bashing vs. talking about CD.  But maybe he feels he needs to clear the air first.  Get all that stuff off his chest and then he'll talk about the music.  We'll see.  He talked about the music in the online forums.  These are a little more condensed and you know the media cares more about the relationship with Slash then how they came up with "Better", unfortunately.

After reading what he said again, I see what you're saying about his guitar playing.  But.....the media?  When the tour manager conducts your interview we're not talking about hardcore journalism here.  These questions were surely pre-arranged.  He could have talked about anything he wanted.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 11:32:06 AM
Del is such a great writer. This article is epic.I will always be happy that i met him in fron of the JOINT in Las Vegas. I'll never forget meeting this really nice lady IN LA. Her name was Avery and she called herself the Malibu psychic. I asked her if she knew Axl , and she said that Axl was a very nice man and that the media had totally misprepresented him. I also met Robert John at my first GNR concert in Las Vegas. He was so mean to me that I almost burst into tears. The good thing is that when I saw him the next day I ran the other way and that is how I ended up meeting Buckethead. Is this article going to be published in ROLLING STONE?

gotta love the sarcasm
This is not sarcastic in any way.I am a true blue hardcore diehard AXLITE!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 11:34:06 AM
I know I'm going to get jumped on for this but here goes.  To me, this was another interesting read that did absolutely nothing to promote Chinese Democracy.  More "Slash is a cancer" crap that has nothing to do with the new album. This time he even went so far as to suggest that Slash wasn't a good guitar player, even on Appetite.

For example, it would have been cool to hear about how a song like Better was constructed.  Instead, we get a paragraph about how Robert John is a drug addict.  Am I the only one who didn't really care what Robert John was up to these days?

But in Axl's own words, this is GNR and not Burger King.  You can't always get what you want.
I don't think he was saying Slash wasn't a good guitar player, just that he prefers guitarists that challenge themselves.  I get your point about the Slash bashing vs. talking about CD.  But maybe he feels he needs to clear the air first.  Get all that stuff off his chest and then he'll talk about the music.  We'll see.  He talked about the music in the online forums.  These are a little more condensed and you know the media cares more about the relationship with Slash then how they came up with "Better", unfortunately.

After reading what he said again, I see what you're saying about his guitar playing.  But.....the media?  When the tour manager conducts your interview we're not talking about hardcore journalism here.  These questions were surely pre-arranged.  He could have talked about anything he wanted.
Yeah, I wasn't talking about the journalist asking the questions, after all I'm sure Del James could've asked any question Axl wanted him to.  I was more referring to the radio stations and other media that will pick up on this interview.  If 80% of the interview was about CD and just 20% was about the old band, guess what they'd report on?  I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't be CD.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 11:36:18 AM
who's pod?


My guess is Chris Vrenna....




/jarmo

okay, I'll bite .... who's Chris Vrenna?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: daviebuckethead on February 27, 2009, 11:36:34 AM
Amen.........more bitter rhetoric......

So predictable.

I knew this was gonna happen once Axl decided to speak out.

For years we've heard the other side of the argument. Axl kept quiet.

Now when he comments on it, he's bitter?  ::)

I guess Slash has been openly bitter since 1996 then? That's how long he's been talking about Axl and GN'R for!






/jarmo



so i assume this the only part of my post you disagree with?

Ok, Slash has said things about the break up of GnR, and on most occasions his sentiments or comments have been backed up by those who where there at the time who have no love for slash anymore either..............so everyone else is wrong?

Lets get one thing straight, i like my rock stars egotistical, and thats what axl is, i wouldn't have it any other way.

And, yes, the questions would be pre-arranged.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 11:37:54 AM
When the tour manager conducts your interview we're not talking about hardcore journalism here.  These questions were surely pre-arranged.  He could have talked about anything he wanted.

I don't know. I think it's more a matter of trusting the person interviewing you.

Instead of sitting down with somebody who you don't know at all and don't know what will happen with the interview once it's done (being misquoted, things twisted around etc.), Del has a history with Axl.

So it's possible the interview actually turns out better when you know you can trust the interviewer.


okay, I'll bite .... who's Chris Vrenna?


Drummer, programmer...

Lately he's been working with Marilyn Manson.






/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 11:38:05 AM

Yeah, I wasn't talking about the journalist asking the questions, after all I'm sure Del James could've asked any question Axl wanted him to.  I was more referring to the radio stations and other media that will pick up on this interview.  If 80% of the interview was about CD and just 20% was about the old band, guess what they'd report on?  I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't be CD.

But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: daviebuckethead on February 27, 2009, 11:39:45 AM

But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

exactly, so why even mention him. he's not in Gnr anymore!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 11:40:32 AM
When the tour manager conducts your interview we're not talking about hardcore journalism here.  These questions were surely pre-arranged.  He could have talked about anything he wanted.

I don't know. I think it's more a matter of trusting the person interviewing you.

Instead of sitting down with somebody who you don't know at all and don't know what will happen with the interview once it's done (being misquoted, things twisted around etc.), Del has a history with Axl.

So it's possible the interview actually turns out better when you know you can trust the interviewer.


I can see what you're saying.  I'll give Del credit.  He did dig a little deeper when Axl seemed reluctant to elaborate on certain things.  Having more than 2 guitars for example.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 11:42:31 AM
But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

That's true.

Doesn't that prove the fact that Axl doesn't play the same game everybody else does?

Which is what makes him so great.


On the other hand, those headlines should stop all the morons in the media writing headlines about a GN'R reunion based on quotes such as "never say never" (or whatever he said) from Duff etc.

So, you see, things aren't always that simple...

If you can get the reunion bullshit to disappear, then you can get down to the real thing and focus on just the present.





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 11:42:46 AM

Yeah, I wasn't talking about the journalist asking the questions, after all I'm sure Del James could've asked any question Axl wanted him to.  I was more referring to the radio stations and other media that will pick up on this interview.  If 80% of the interview was about CD and just 20% was about the old band, guess what they'd report on?  I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't be CD.

But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  
You know what they say, any press is good press.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AxlReznor on February 27, 2009, 11:42:59 AM
Amen.........more bitter rhetoric......

So predictable.

I knew this was gonna happen once Axl decided to speak out.

For years we've heard the other side of the argument. Axl kept quiet.

Now when he comments on it, he's bitter?  ::)

I guess Slash has been openly bitter since 1996 then? That's how long he's been talking about Axl and GN'R for!






/jarmo



To be fair, he has said his piece on Slash numerous times now.  It's annoying when Slash talks shit about Axl, but it's just as annoying that whenever you read anything from Axl nowadays, he's reiterating everything he said the last time.  The first couple of times I can understand and was actually defending his right to say it from people because there were years of pent-up feelings that he needed to get out.  But he got it out now, and to repeat himself over and over again, isn't that one of the things Axl criticised Slash for doing in the Billboard interview?

Personally, I'm interested in what the band is doing now, the new members, the new music, the new tours.  I'd like to read an interview with Axl with more information about that and not just complaining about Slash/management/record label, etc.  In short, promoting what he's doing now should take priority over prolonging a feud with someone he hasn't seen for 13 years.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 11:45:22 AM
But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

That's true.

Doesn't that prove the fact that Axl doesn't play the same game everybody else does?

Which is what makes him so great.


On the other hand, those headlines should stop all the morons in the media writing headlines about a GN'R reunion based on quotes such as "never say never" (or whatever he said) from Duff etc.

So, you see, things aren't always that simple...

If you can get the reunion bullshit to disappear, then you can get down to the real thing and focus on just the present.





/jarmo
Good point.  I remember a few weeks after CD was released people were predicting a reunion was on the horizon.  I couldn't believe people were actually buying into that but then the media actually bought into it.  Maybe this will help squash those rumors once and for all.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 11:46:37 AM
that was a head scratcher for sure


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 11:48:18 AM
But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

That's true.

Doesn't that prove the fact that Axl doesn't play the same game everybody else does?

Which is what makes him so great.


On the other hand, those headlines should stop all the morons in the media writing headlines about a GN'R reunion based on quotes such as "never say never" (or whatever he said) from Duff etc.

So, you see, things aren't always that simple...

If you can get the reunion bullshit to disappear, then you can get down to the real thing and focus on just the present.





/jarmo

I just wish he'd gotten the reunion bullshit to disappear long before CD came out.  Then we could be focusing on the present now.  I think the new album is great, people should hear it, and just hate to see it get overshadowed by all this old lineup soap opera shit.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 11:48:23 AM
Amen.........more bitter rhetoric......

So predictable.

I knew this was gonna happen once Axl decided to speak out.

For years we've heard the other side of the argument. Axl kept quiet.

Now when he comments on it, he's bitter?  ::)

I guess Slash has been openly bitter since 1996 then? That's how long he's been talking about Axl and GN'R for!






/jarmo



To be fair, he has said his piece on Slash numerous times now.  It's annoying when Slash talks shit about Axl, but it's just as annoying that whenever you read anything from Axl nowadays, he's reiterating everything he said the last time.  The first couple of times I can understand and was actually defending his right to say it from people because there were years of pent-up feelings that he needed to get out.  But he got it out now, and to repeat himself over and over again, isn't that one of the things Axl criticised Slash for doing in the Billboard interview?

Personally, I'm interested in what the band is doing now, the new members, the new music, the new tours.  I'd like to read an interview with Axl with more information about that and not just complaining about Slash/management/record label, etc.  In short, promoting what he's doing now should take priority over prolonging a feud with someone he hasn't seen for 13 years.
Again, I see where you're coming from and I too would love to hear more about the music and less about Slash.  But you and I are in the minority.  The vast majority would much rather hear about the Slash/Axl relationship and Axl certainly has every right to get his side of the story out there until he feels vindicated.  It's just like when people complain about the setlists at shows they don't attend.  Just because YOU want to hear "Dead Horse" doesn't mean the 10,000 other people at the show do.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: The Glow Inc. on February 27, 2009, 11:48:35 AM
Quote
In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided -- and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better.

Fine ! I don't care about Slash either...Now that the cancer is removed, that nobody gives a damn about the old line-up anymore, could we focus on Chinese Democracy and the ACTUAL BAND ? I mean, seriously ? Last time, Axl said that Chinese Democracy isn't a solo project ( which I agree with ) and now he comes with that kind of answers ?

Quote
Who's in the band?

I think we'll go with a combo of who's around and who's on the album for now and worry about that when we get ready to tour.

Quote
Is Robin [Finck] in the band?

Last I was aware, he had some interest in touring, though I can't say what that means until then.

Quote
So you have two drummers? Will they both tour?

Yes, and who knows?

 ???


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 11:49:10 AM
Personally, I'm interested in what the band is doing now, the new members, the new music, the new tours.  I'd like to read an interview with Axl with more information about that ...
But Del did ask those questions and Axl did answer them.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Ulises on February 27, 2009, 11:53:51 AM
Axl is THE man. Definitely


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 11:54:27 AM
I hope this is the last Interview that Axl focuses on the old era. This "interview", along with his recent comments, have given a clear indication to all that are concerned on where he stands with Slash and the old lineup.

Patiently waiting for the new era of gnr to begin


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Spirit on February 27, 2009, 11:55:10 AM

Quote
So you have two drummers? Will they both tour?

Yes, and who knows?

 ???


I guess it hasn't been decided if both Frank and Brain will be on the same tour.

If they do, they'll probably do one leg/week/night each?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 11:57:07 AM
I hope this is the last Interview that Axl focuses on the old era. The world should know where he satnds by now.

Patiently waiting for the new era of gnr to begin
I would think, though obviously don't know for sure, once the band gets out on the road the focus will be on the present.  At this moment there's no official tour news for the band so Axl seems to be clearing the air in the meantime.  Nothing wrong with that.  Slash has had his say for years.  I know some people would've liked Axl to stay silent about the matters, but it's well within his rights.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Nytunz on February 27, 2009, 11:57:26 AM

Quote
So you have two drummers? Will they both tour?

Yes, and who knows?

 ???


I guess it hasn't been decided if both Frank and Brain will be on the same tour.

If they do, they'll probably do one leg/week/night each?

And it would be awsome with two drumkits on stage!

But i guess thats against "rock n roll rules"

I think it would be awsome..


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 11:58:36 AM
I understand Axl saying whats on his mind about Slash.   its like Jarmo said, the reunion bullshit needs to STOP seriously.

You go on mygnr and its been overrun by this small but very loud group of posters who hijack every single discussion to talk about fairy-tale reunions and make baseless unfair attacks on current members of Guns N' Roses.    Its not only allowed, but condoned by the moderators.    No respect for the present day GnR whatsoever.

its frustrating as a GnR fan to see that bullshit, so I can imagine Axl is even more tired of it.

I too am very much looking forward to putting the past behind us.  

Theres a small group of Slash fans who want to ruin everything for those of us who still care for GnR without Slash.   Bitter fucks, and cancer is a good word for it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:00:18 PM
Quote
I would think, though obviously don't know for sure, once the band gets out on the road the focus will be on the present.  At this moment there's no official tour news for the band so Axl seems to be clearing the air in the meantime.  Nothing wrong with that.  Slash has had his say for years.  I know some people would've liked Axl to stay silent about the matters, but it's well within his rights.
Axl has every right to say what he wants. He chose to hold off over the years so hes just letting it all out now. I personally think he missed the boat on that(in terms of public perception) but he still has the right.

I just want to focus on the new era. But his comments in this interview are a little troubling in regards to that.

I am beginning to think twice about the people who Axl has surrounded himself with over the years.

Quote
I understand Axl saying whats on his mind about Slash.   its like Jarmo said, the reunion bullshit needs to STOP seriously.

You go on mygnr and its been overrun by this small but very loud group of posters who hijack every single discussion to talk about fairy-tale reunions and make baseless unfair attacks on current members of Guns N' Roses.    Its not only allowed, but condoned by the moderators.    No respect for the present day GnR whatsoever.

its frustrating as a GnR fan to see that bullshit, so I can imagine Axl is even more tired of it.

I too am very much looking forward to putting the past behind us.   

Theres a small group of Slash fans who want to ruin everything for those of us who still care for GnR without Slash.   Bitter fucks, and cancer is a good word for it.
until they go out there and do stuff people are going to talk about the past. People will always talk about the past. That is what happens when you keep the name... but if you are out there doing your own thing then you will give people something to talk about other than the past.

The "interview" overall was a head scratcher.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 12:09:09 PM

until they go out there and do stuff people are going to talk about the past. People will always talk about the past. That is what happens when you keep the name... but if you are out there doing your own thing then you will give people something to talk about other than the past.



Two tours and an album?

Stop acting like the band hasn't done anything.   Your constant need to find something negative is annoying as fuck.

 My point was some gnR sites need to do a little better job of moderating their site.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 12:12:13 PM

 My point was some gnR sites need to do a little better job of moderating their site.

Personally I think each individual GNR site owner should moderate it however they see fit.  That's what Jarmo does.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: faldor on February 27, 2009, 12:12:28 PM
So no Nick Sterling?  Just kidding.  I wonder what would happen if GNR plays the rumored summer dates?  Robin will undoutebly still be with NIN, what if Bucket doesn't want to return?  Do they go with just Richard/Ron or do they try to find someone else?  I doubt Paul would want to tour, but he WAS a big part of the album.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 12:14:01 PM
Told u guys when Axl started doing interviews he would talk a bout the old band etc.


So much for the "No Comment" stuff right?



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:14:35 PM
Quote
Two tours and an album?
I must have missed the tours that supported Chin Dem. Amazing how they did two tours since November. I must be living under a rock


Quote
Stop acting like the band hasn't done anything.   Your constant need to find something negative is annoying as fuck.
other than releasing an album what has the band done? In comparison to what 99% of the music industry does after releasing an album, gnr has done nada....

Im not going out of my way to find anything negative. I read what Axl had to say in this "interview" and for the first time after reading an Axl interview, I found myself scratching my head....

 
Quote
My point was some gnR sites need to do a little better job of moderating their site.
Overall, I agree with you on that

But you have to realize that if Axl is going to focus on the old band then so will the fans. Especially the people who still havnt bought into the whole moving on thing. It comes with the territory. That is hy Axl should just say fuck it and promote the new stuff and be positive.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 12:15:57 PM
I must have missed the tours that supported Chin Dem. Amazing how they did two tours since November. I must be living under a rock

I think he meant the tours they did. Including the one you remember so fondly...




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:16:59 PM
Quote
I think he meant the tours they did. Including the one you remember so fondly...
The tours they did were not for the album


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 12:19:19 PM
Quote
I think he meant the tours they did. Including the one you remember so fondly...
The tours they did were not for the album


But they kinda promoted the new band didn't they?

I mean, how else could you have fallen in love with Buckethead and GN'R?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on February 27, 2009, 12:19:35 PM
Told u guys when Axl started doing interviews he would talk a bout the old band etc.


So much for the "No Comment" stuff right?



of course, but he hasn't spoken about it for 12 years like some other might have done

I bet it'll take less 12 years for axl to stop talk about it

I think he deserves to tell his side of every story slash has made up ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 12:19:43 PM

Overall, I agree with you on that

But you have to realize that if Axl is going to focus on the old band then so will the fans. Especially the people who still havnt bought into the whole moving on thing. It comes with the territory. That is hy Axl should just say fuck it and promote the new stuff and be positive.

Axl is only focusing on it because of the loud ass detractors who keep spreading reunion rumors and refusing to allow GnR fans to discuss their fav band on these forums without hijacking it to be about the old band.   My opinion at least.

If people would stop the reunion bullshit, this interview might have went differently.     This is what is needed to wake people up.

Axl is blunt, and he says he means.   People dont' have to like or agree with it, but at least he's genuine in his words.    Slash is more a media whore who maintains a fake public persona and lies his ass off for the sake of self-promotion and financial gain.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 12:21:07 PM
Absolutely but people would jump on the old dudes for answering a question asked to them as "Promoting themselves through talking about Axl etc"

I argued till I was blue in the face that it was ok to answer questions asked and u wait and see, Axl will do the same.

People said they should just say "No Comment"


I think he went a little far in his bashing.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 12:21:46 PM
Told u guys when Axl started doing interviews he would talk a bout the old band etc.


So much for the "No Comment" stuff right?



to be fair,when you have guys like adler in the media who hype up reunions constantly and fake media whores like slash who says whatever he thinks will be popular opinion, things need to be addressed.

Believe me, I'm hoping the next Axl interview is a song-by-song disection of the album with his thoughts on each track where he doesnt' even have to mention the word slash.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 12:23:06 PM
Quote
I think he meant the tours they did. Including the one you remember so fondly...
The tours they did were not for the album

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

The tours were to get out there and promote themselves and play for the fans.   It wasn't that long ago.   And I think more is coming.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:23:14 PM
Quote
But they kinda promoted the new band didn't they?


fair point. I have always said the 02 tour was just to get out of the studio and introduce the band to the public. But by no means was it the tour that would define the album or new gnr.

That tour comes after the release.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 12:24:56 PM
Absolutely but people would jump on the old dudes for answering a question asked to them as "Promoting themselves through talking about Axl etc"

Look at the number of interviews and the time spent on talking about it... You might see the difference then.


That tour comes after the release.

So the Use Your Illusion tour legs before the release didn't count? Damn....  ;)





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on February 27, 2009, 12:26:16 PM
fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Nytunz on February 27, 2009, 12:26:43 PM
Told u guys when Axl started doing interviews he would talk a bout the old band etc.


So much for the "No Comment" stuff right?



to be fair,when you have guys like adler in the media who hype up reunions constantly and fake media whores like slash who says whatever he thinks will be popular opinion, things need to be addressed.

Believe me, I'm hoping the next Axl interview is a song-by-song disection of the album with his thoughts on each track where he doesnt' even have to mention the word slash.

Axl answer what he wants, to what questions he get.

If he gets the question about Slash, and a reunion, he may want to give an answer that dont create speculations..
What if Axl had answerd "no comment" to a question about reunion.. then the speculations would be out there right away..

I think its nice to see that Axl says what he what he have on his heart...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:29:31 PM
Quote
Axl is only focusing on it because of the loud ass detractors who keep spreading reunion rumors and refusing to allow GnR fans to discuss their fav band on these forums without hijacking it to be about the old band.   My opinion at least.

so in reality Axl is doing what you say I and other always do?
focus on the negative.


Quote
If people would stop the reunion bullshit, this interview might have went differently.     This is what is needed to wake people up.

Wake who up exactley?? Do you think people care? Imo, Axl missed that boat a long time ago. He still has the right to get his side out but in terms of changing peoples minds, he has no shot. Instead, hes going to come across as bitter etc.

Whos holding you back from talking about GNR? You make it seem like this board is like mygnr? If you dont like MYGNR then whey do you go their and let it effect your gnr spirit? You have a home right here where its totally opposite of my gnr.


  
Quote
Slash is more a media whore who maintains a fake public persona and lies his ass off for the sake of self-promotion and financial gain.
Whether he is or isnt how the hell would you know? Were you ever his friend or something?

Axl is telling his side of the story....just like Slash has told his. The truth is somewhere in the middle.

Quote
So the Use Your Illusion tour legs before the release didn't count? Damn.... 
Being that GNR didnt tour anytime before CD's release it didnt have to be brought up....

So now your going to compare the massive UYI tour with the 2002 and 06 "CD" tour? What planet do you live on?



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 12:31:49 PM
Another thing.

"Why doesn't Axl do interviews? He needs to talk!  :crying: " is now "He shouldn't talk about that!  :crying: "




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 12:33:18 PM
fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore

ok let me rephrase that

slash is a fraud and a media whore


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Howard2k on February 27, 2009, 12:34:11 PM
Wow, great interview.

Strong words about Slash!  My interpretation is not that he's saying "Slash is a shit guitarist" but perhaps "Look at where Slash was in the late 80s with his playing on appetite and look at where he is now.  He's not challenging himself and not growing as a player".  

And as much as I do love some of Slash's work (a lot of it in fact), maybe he's right.

And he also points the same light on himself too, saying that he was in the same position.  It seems like a very easy trap to fall into.  Slash played for hours and hours and hours a day in his youth, working on his technique and his style.  Does he have the same commitment today?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on February 27, 2009, 12:36:55 PM
fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore

wanna bet ! Slash is only in it for Slash himself.  It's really obvious, Axl's right ! Slash never challenged himself to play something diffrent.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on February 27, 2009, 12:38:46 PM
fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore

ok let me rephrase that

slash is a fraud and a media whore
better :)

fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore

wanna bet ! Slash is only in it for Slash himself.  It's really obvious, Axl's right ! Slash never challenged himself to play something diffrent.

I was saying that slash wasn't faking his mediawhoreness : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Nytunz on February 27, 2009, 12:39:04 PM
fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore

wanna bet ! Slash is only in it for Slash himself.  It's really obvious, Axl's right ! Slash never challenged himself to play something diffrent.

i think he ment a REAL media whore, not a FAKE one..  :hihi:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 12:40:08 PM
^yes

 ;D

So how about the rest of that interview?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:47:21 PM
We can go on forever about Axl and Slash.

His comments about Izzy were strange as well.

But  Axls comments about new material was the low point of the interview for me. They contradict what he has said in the past numerous times and also what he said about the whole masterpiece angle.

That is why this is just another press release and not a real interview


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rockin' Rose on February 27, 2009, 12:48:54 PM
Nice reading, I hope Del and Axl do a follow up about the music of CD and the working process of it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 12:53:52 PM
fake media whores like slash

dude, you can't call slash a fake media whore

ok let me rephrase that

slash is a fraud and a media whore
So true! There is a quote from the stage version of MEDEA GOES TO JAIL by Tyler Perry where Medea talks about people in our lives being like trees; that some fall off like leaves in a season,while others are roots that keep us grounded in a storm. "When you get some roots, hold onto them," Medea says, "The rest of 'em? Just let them go. Let folks go."  For those of us in the GNR community Axl is our roots and the former members of GNR are leaves that fell away. We just need to let them go and SLASH needs to move on himself. Axl would have been a success with or without those guys, it may have been very different, but AXL would have made it. My own mother said, "none of those guys would have been anything without Axl."


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 12:56:43 PM
Quote
Axl would have been a success with or without those guys, it may have been very different, but AXL would have made it. My own mother said, "none of those guys would have been anything without Axl."
if your going to make statements like that, or be allowed to make them here, then I hope your not going to be the same person complaining when people start challenging those statements


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 12:58:13 PM
Quote
Axl would have been a success with or without those guys, it may have been very different, but AXL would have made it. My own mother said, "none of those guys would have been anything without Axl."
if your going to make statements like that, or be allowed to make them here, then I hope your not going to be the same person complaining when people start challenging those statements
I'm all about people expressing their opinions. That is mine.  And Jarmo is free to delete my posts if he sees fit. He has done it before! :hihi:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 01:01:04 PM
Quote
Axl would have been a success with or without those guys, it may have been very different, but AXL would have made it. My own mother said, "none of those guys would have been anything without Axl."
if your going to make statements like that, or be allowed to make them here, then I hope your not going to be the same person complaining when people start challenging those statements
I'm all about people expressing their opinions. That is mine.
agreed.
My point is that we can have a 100+ page bonanza on those few lines alone. But the people who have different opinions than you would be deamed as negative, bitter, etc


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 01:03:39 PM
Quote
Axl would have been a success with or without those guys, it may have been very different, but AXL would have made it. My own mother said, "none of those guys would have been anything without Axl."
if your going to make statements like that, or be allowed to make them here, then I hope your not going to be the same person complaining when people start challenging those statements
I'm all about people expressing their opinions. That is mine.
agreed.
My point is that we can have a 100+ page bonanza on those few lines alone. But the people who have different opinions than you would be deamed as negative, bitter, etc
I would see them as passionate about their beliefs, however misguided. :hihi:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on February 27, 2009, 01:08:36 PM
See all that worry for nothing ! Robin's intrested in touring ! believe me Robin will be there when the time comes.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on February 27, 2009, 01:15:04 PM
Although I am obviously a Slash fan and the original Guns are my favourite band ever (I've long given up care or hope of a reunion), new Guns are my favorite  band and Axl is my idea of the ideal frontman. The thing I don't get is if you don't care for something and have a new album that you've spent much of your life just come out, why the hell dedicate all interviews towards people you hate rather than the music itself?! Only people dwelling on "Appetite" want to hear about the old line-up, the real fans want to hear about Chinese Democracy that is the most relevant and newsworthy thing to all of us.

Axl lately really has came across as bitter and untrusting (Don't even try to call me a hater, I stand up for him whenever someone slags him off) in all his recent interviews, fair enough just say "I really can't stand *whomever*" then just move on yet he chooses to continually bring up irrelevant things. Even as far as to bad mouth and praise Izzy in the same paragraph. According to Axl everyone was trying to take over the band and he had to "defend" himself which led him in charge, it just sounds like paranoia to me. A whole host of people have stated it was all just in Axl's mind and Alan Niven said "Slash could barely even run a bath let alone take over a band". I just hate how a large majority of people on GNR boards take Axl's words as if it were the bible and blame attatched to him is immediately false, remember there is 3 sides to every story not just 1!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 01:21:26 PM
because some people doesn't know that Freedom of speech is not liberty to lie.

and keep trying to convince others that the bridge wasn't burned.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 01:29:09 PM
I meant 'don't' :-[

See all that worry for nothing ! Robin's intrested in touring ! believe me Robin will be there when the time comes.

yeah
as axl thinks they'll go with a combo of who's around and who's on the album for now and worry about that when they get ready to tour,
we better relax too.

It's not like the old band situation at all.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: victor08 on February 27, 2009, 01:33:36 PM
Although I am obviously a Slash fan and the original Guns are my favourite band ever (I've long given up care or hope of a reunion), new Guns are my favorite  band and Axl is my idea of the ideal frontman. The thing I don't get is if you don't care for something and have a new album that you've spent much of your life just come out, why the hell dedicate all interviews towards people you hate rather than the music itself?! Only people dwelling on "Appetite" want to hear about the old line-up, the real fans want to hear about Chinese Democracy that is the most relevant and newsworthy thing to all of us.

Axl lately really has came across as bitter and untrusting (Don't even try to call me a hater, I stand up for him whenever someone slags him off) in all his recent interviews, fair enough just say "I really can't stand *whomever*" then just move on yet he chooses to continually bring up irrelevant things. Even as far as to bad mouth and praise Izzy in the same paragraph. According to Axl everyone was trying to take over the band and he had to "defend" himself which led him in charge, it just sounds like paranoia to me. A whole host of people have stated it was all just in Axl's mind and Alan Niven said "Slash could barely even run a bath let alone take over a band". I just hate how a large majority of people on GNR boards take Axl's words as if it were the bible and blame attatched to him is immediately false, remember there is 3 sides to every story not just 1!

i don't think axl comes off as bitter. and he wasn't bad mouthing izzy. he was just stating facts.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 01:34:09 PM
Told u guys when Axl started doing interviews he would talk a bout the old band etc.


So much for the "No Comment" stuff right?



to be fair,when you have guys like adler in the media who hype up reunions constantly and fake media whores like slash who says whatever he thinks will be popular opinion, things need to be addressed.

Believe me, I'm hoping the next Axl interview is a song-by-song disection of the album with his thoughts on each track where he doesnt' even have to mention the word slash.

Axl answer what he wants, to what questions he get.

If he gets the question about Slash, and a reunion, he may want to give an answer that dont create speculations..
What if Axl had answerd "no comment" to a question about reunion.. then the speculations would be out there right away..

I think its nice to see that Axl says what he what he have on his heart...

Exactly and that was my point when the old members were asked questions about Axl. Its best to just give an answer and move on then say "no comment"



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 01:36:14 PM
Its best to just give an answer and move on then say "no comment"

Maybe it's better to say "no comment" because your stories keep changing....




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 01:38:09 PM
I think axl has given the best answers. decisive and honest


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Howard2k on February 27, 2009, 01:38:12 PM
Although I am obviously a Slash fan and the original Guns are my favourite band ever (I've long given up care or hope of a reunion), new Guns are my favorite  band and Axl is my idea of the ideal frontman. The thing I don't get is if you don't care for something and have a new album that you've spent much of your life just come out, why the hell dedicate all interviews towards people you hate rather than the music itself?! Only people dwelling on "Appetite" want to hear about the old line-up, the real fans want to hear about Chinese Democracy that is the most relevant and newsworthy thing to all of us.

Axl lately really has came across as bitter and untrusting (Don't even try to call me a hater, I stand up for him whenever someone slags him off) in all his recent interviews, fair enough just say "I really can't stand *whomever*" then just move on yet he chooses to continually bring up irrelevant things. Even as far as to bad mouth and praise Izzy in the same paragraph. According to Axl everyone was trying to take over the band and he had to "defend" himself which led him in charge, it just sounds like paranoia to me. A whole host of people have stated it was all just in Axl's mind and Alan Niven said "Slash could barely even run a bath let alone take over a band". I just hate how a large majority of people on GNR boards take Axl's words as if it were the bible and blame attatched to him is immediately false, remember there is 3 sides to every story not just 1!


He's human.  

It seems that somehow a lot of us feel that celebrities are more than human and don't (or shouldn't) react to situations the same way that we do.  If you had a band and your buddy pissed all over it, you'd probably be a bit pissed off too right?

I certainly don't want to see 12 months of interviews of Axl bashing Slash, but I say let's let Axl throw in his 2 cents too.  He's been silent for so long on these issues when others haven't been.




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 01:42:11 PM
Still though, if u are doing a 10 minute radio interview, and the guy asks a question, saying no comment will only fuel the thirst and u will then get bombarded with thousands of questions a different way.

when u say "No Comment" I for one interpret that negatively.


I have no problem with Axl giving his side of the story. I just hope that every interview isn't about this. He has made his point about the reunion, I think it takes away from the new stuff by constantly bashing the old.

I agree with Axl on the UYI drums but I think he is way off on the AFD drumming. I think that drumming really gives those songs life and an energy/attitude that most rock songs lack.



Also, what about the Chicago UYI sessions where everyone talked about how Axl never showed up for them? I'd like to see which side of that story is true.



Agree with Axl and I've been saying it for years how difficult it must have been working with a drugged up Slash and Izzy and getting everyone to work together.

I've always been in his corner on that one.


How about the Kurt Loder interview where he complimented Slash's playing and talked how no one can recreate old Guns but Slash or something like that. He then goes on to diss him and his playing which makes no sense at all.


If people think GNR would be what they are today without the 5 guys collectively, i think u are wrong.


If Axl was singing over LA Gun or Poison riffs, he wouldn't be the legend he is today.


This forum and even Axl in my opinion underestimate just how great the MUSIC on those albums are and how just not anybody can write that kind of stuff.

without the old guys, u wouldn't have anything on Appetite but Anything Goes, Back off Bitch and November Rain without the epic solos


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: izzbo on February 27, 2009, 01:45:13 PM
i agree, what the fuck was all that pish about robert john, and how is it relevant or even remotely interesting to anybody, besides Axls lawyer and accountant! talking in riddles to try and sound intelligent, and avoid litigation most of the time i think. Which again highlights his obsession with the law.

Actually I've been wondering what the deal was w/Robert for a while so this was actually the most interesting part of the interview for me (along w/the Robin being interested in touring part).

 -= iZzBo =-


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 01:52:11 PM
If you go back and look at some of the interviews Axl did in the 90s, you might notice how they're not exactly focusing on promoting the album at the time.

Were you disappointed when that 1992 Rolling Stone interview (http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/articles/showarticle.php?articleid=56) was published and he didn't just talk about the Use Your Illusion albums?

when u say "No Comment" I for one interpret that negatively.

I wouldn't be surprised if some are afraid of pissing off the journalists so they just play along and answer.

Axl on the other hand doesn't seem to be afraid of saying what he thinks, even if it pissed people off.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: falungong69 on February 27, 2009, 01:53:47 PM
Although I am obviously a Slash fan and the original Guns are my favourite band ever (I've long given up care or hope of a reunion), new Guns are my favorite  band and Axl is my idea of the ideal frontman. The thing I don't get is if you don't care for something and have a new album that you've spent much of your life just come out, why the hell dedicate all interviews towards people you hate rather than the music itself?! Only people dwelling on "Appetite" want to hear about the old line-up, the real fans want to hear about Chinese Democracy that is the most relevant and newsworthy thing to all of us.

Axl lately really has came across as bitter and untrusting (Don't even try to call me a hater, I stand up for him whenever someone slags him off) in all his recent interviews, fair enough just say "I really can't stand *whomever*" then just move on yet he chooses to continually bring up irrelevant things. Even as far as to bad mouth and praise Izzy in the same paragraph. According to Axl everyone was trying to take over the band and he had to "defend" himself which led him in charge, it just sounds like paranoia to me. A whole host of people have stated it was all just in Axl's mind and Alan Niven said "Slash could barely even run a bath let alone take over a band". I just hate how a large majority of people on GNR boards take Axl's words as if it were the bible and blame attatched to him is immediately false, remember there is 3 sides to every story not just 1!

i'll be the first to say it then... you're a hater.  for so long, everyone has bitched that axl hasn't given interviews.  so he decides to finally give them, and you're mad because he isn't saying what you want him to say.  well t.s.  he's answering the questions posed by the interviewer.  i'm sorry he didn't have time to run everything by you personally so you would be happy.  

for too long, slash has been a cancer in gnr and the music world at large.  FACT:  he is a media whore.  you try and make fun of anyone who happens to believe axl is honest by saying that axl's word isn't the bible.  well no, it's not and nobody's saying that.  but when we're talking about GUNS N' ROSES, the band that axl rose legally owns and is the front man of, then his word is the closest thing you can get to the bible.  so accept it.  or be a hater, and diss axl for not thinking and feeling and saying exactly what you want him to say.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 01:55:05 PM
What does Slash do exactly that makes him a media whore??

I just want to know what constitutes that

no arguing, just curious as to your opinion.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rhino on February 27, 2009, 01:59:42 PM
cool interview I like the attitude and straight shooting. I just wish he would talk about the new band and band members more. I think everyone is over the old days, especially since the casual gnr fan now sees how good the band/ album is, where as before they would be like ...wheres slash?.  lets focus on the present.

PS

I wonder what happened with that better video, i guess we can put that one to rest now as well.

Cant wait to see the band live again soon.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:00:31 PM
I thought it was interesting how he talked about how he'd let Duff play guitar on a song?? I know Duff was a guitar player before joining GNR, maybe he join them for Patience or something?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rhino on February 27, 2009, 02:01:03 PM
What does Slash do exactly that makes him a media whore??

I just want to know what constitutes that

no arguing, just curious as to your opinion.

Jam with fergie,?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 02:01:40 PM
What does Slash do exactly that makes him a media whore??

Really?

You can't figure it out why some would think he's one?

All those photo opportunities at award shows/galas and whatnot doesn't give a clue?

I'm just guessing, but a lot of that stuff has very little to do with his music.... Which is what made him famous in the first place. It's more about being seen and getting publicity.





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 02:01:57 PM
Quote
Is Brain in the band?
Last I checked. Brain works on several things with Guns either from his home or in the studio.

Wonder what those "several things with Guns" Brain is working on are??!!!  :D


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Axlspants on February 27, 2009, 02:04:14 PM
Great interview and I appreciate Axl talking about Slash and wanting to get shit off his chest but I'd loved to have more info about the songs on CD, who they're about and what the inspiration behind them are, also when are they touring. I guess all will be revealed. Great to hear from the main man though.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 02:04:33 PM
Axl is an artist with integrity.

Axl could have sold his story just the same as slash sold his.. but instead he chose to come talk to his fans directly and give a few select interviews with journalists that he trusts.  

Slash is a fake public persona, he's all about his image and his brand.    He is also a manipulator and a very shrewd media opportunist.

Funny thing is, these days he's become a cariculture of himself and has been reduced to performing with fergie and appearing on ellen.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: victor08 on February 27, 2009, 02:06:31 PM
Axl is an artist with integrity.

Axl could have sold his story just the same as slash sold his.. but instead he chose to come talk to his fans directly and give a few select interviews with journalists that he trusts.  

Slash is a fake public persona, he's all about his image and his brand.    He is also a manipulator and a very shrewd media opportunist.

Funny thing is, these days he's become a cariculture of himself and has been reduced to performing with fergie and appearing on ellen.



i agree with all of this. :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rhino on February 27, 2009, 02:07:43 PM
What does Slash do exactly that makes him a media whore??

Really?

You can't figure it out why some would think he's one?

All those photo opportunities at award shows/galas and whatnot doesn't give a clue?

I'm just guessing, but a lot of that stuff has very little to do with his music.... Which is what made him famous in the first place. It's more about being seen and getting publicity.





/jarmo


There are a few reasons why. Although I don't agree on this one. Publicizing/marketing yourself inst doing something wrong at all. Its just a personality just as being a recluse ist a bad thing although that dosnt automatuically make you "cool" either . Its just different personalities.

Maybe its the way some people go about publicizing them selfs thats behind the scenes that wrong or is what he was maybe refuring to.

Just for the record IMO Jamming with fergie is a joke(whoring) ...imagine axl jamming with hanna montana for a cover of Sweet Child......some might call that a sellout.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:08:07 PM
Axl is an artist with integrity.

Axl could have sold his story just the same as slash sold his.. but instead he chose to come talk to his fans directly and give a few select interviews with journalists that he trusts.  

Slash is a fake public persona, he's all about his image and his brand.    He is also a manipulator and a very shrewd media opportunist.

Funny thing is, these days he's become a cariculture of himself and has been reduced to performing with fergie and appearing on ellen.



Come on now Jim Bob. Let's don't be ridiculous.

Reduced?

U are acting like he is on some lame VH1 reality show.

Last I checked 4 years ago or so they did have 2 number 1 singles and a grammy and a double platinum CD....

Not bad for some washed up loser, caricature guitar player.


I am with u on the Fergie shit.  That i absolutely hate.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rhino on February 27, 2009, 02:10:34 PM
Axl is an artist with integrity.

Axl could have sold his story just the same as slash sold his.. but instead he chose to come talk to his fans directly and give a few select interviews with journalists that he trusts.   

Slash is a fake public persona, he's all about his image and his brand.    He is also a manipulator and a very shrewd media opportunist.

Funny thing is, these days he's become a cariculture of himself and has been reduced to performing with fergie and appearing on ellen.




All for Axl, but what is so bad about promoting your image? Just cause you hide away dosn't make you James Dean cool. I bet Slash fans love seeing slash everywhere. If Axl shiowed up on Conan, would you call him a sellout?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 02:14:08 PM
Publicizing/marketing yourself inst doing something wrong at all.

I know. Everybody has their opinion.

I'm just saying, maybe all the appearances on award shows, red carpets, selling your house on Ellen, VW commercial etc etc. makes some people see him as a publicity whore and attention seeker.

Obviously others just think of it as cool or a necessity to further a musician's career. Or pay the bills.



If Axl shiowed up on Conan, would you call him a sellout?

Everybody does the late night TV shows when they're promoting something.

It's part of the promotion game.







/jarmo



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:14:08 PM
I think people get themselves into trouble making statements like Jim Bob just did.

Cause this summer, when the Best Buy deal expires and Axl re releases CD, who the fuck knows what kind of media shit he will do.

Then, I am gonna pull back up this thread and once again people will be eating a lot of crow.



How many video games and movies has GNR songs appeared in?

U can buy GNR baby clothes at Spencers.


So let's don't act like Axl is some indie coffee shop dude, selling Cds out of a car either.

He hasn't been a media whore since GNR split BUT this is the same guy who had a limo meet him at the police station with an MTV crew inside.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SOLGER on February 27, 2009, 02:14:55 PM
Conan is no more! :rofl:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 02:15:31 PM
I agree with Slash being a media whore. He should learn to say no to some things. But how does he have a fake public persona? In most interviews these days, he talks about guitars, being in rock bands, and how fucked up he used to get. That seems to be what he's always been about.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 02:15:47 PM
the less anyone heard of slash or his supporters, the better.  :-*


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 02:17:15 PM
He hasn't been a media whore since GNR split BUT this is the same guy who had a limo meet him at the police station with an MTV crew inside.

 ::)

Once again, you're missing the point.

What better way to get your side out to your fans than to talk to MTV's Kurt Loder?

How many Axl interviews did you see during that period? Would you say the market was over saturated with Axl interviews in the early 90s?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rhino on February 27, 2009, 02:20:45 PM
Publicizing/marketing yourself inst doing something wrong at all.

I know. Everybody has their opinion.

I'm just saying, maybe all the appearances on award shows, red carpets, selling your house on Ellen, VW commercial etc etc. makes some people see him as a publicity whore and attention seeker.

Obviously others just think of it as cool or a necessity to further a musician's career. Or pay the bills.



If Axl shiowed up on Conan, would you call him a sellout?

Everybody does the late night TV shows when they're promoting something.

It's part of the promotion game.







/jarmo




Then where is ol' Axl Id love to see him on Conan, where is that elusive Video ...Its almost time for the next single?

I would agree Slash has taken it to the max almost sellout stage of the promo game, but the zero lack of promotion from the Guns camp is almost as frustrating. I respected Pearl Jam for there stance against mass media promotion for years but they were always "out there" on late night TV or Rolling Stone./ Touring ect.
Im so proud of Guns and for Being a fan all these years with the New Album Kicking ass Id love to see them get out there and kick some ass!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: 14 Yrs Of Silence on February 27, 2009, 02:20:56 PM
Axl was blunt and direct at times in this interview, and I appreciate that candor, but to be quite honest, there are portions of this interview that I really am having trouble understanding what he's saying.  I don't have time to get into it now, but tonight I'm going to post some quotes and hopefully get a productive discussion going to analyze some of Axls ramblings.  I just start with one for now.

Did you break up the old Guns?

It is my belief that the commitment to end old Guns came long before the band started in the heart and soul of one man.

So is he implying that Slash intended to breakup the band before they even started?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: DeN on February 27, 2009, 02:23:33 PM
okay, with this one, I hope noone will question again the reunion thing. good point, time to move on.
it was more interesting than the first interview to read I admit, and some answers made me laugh.
thx to Del and Axl for that.

ah, I'm curious to know the story about Izzy's contract for touring, but I suppose noone knows on this board...



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Howard2k on February 27, 2009, 02:24:43 PM
What does Slash do exactly that makes him a media whore??

I just want to know what constitutes that

no arguing, just curious as to your opinion.

Jam with fergie,?


I'd jam with Fergie!!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 02:25:00 PM
Then where is ol' Axl Id love to see him on Conan, where is that elusive Video ...Its almost time for the next single?

I said it's part of the promotional game, I didn't say Axl plays the same game everybody else does....  :P

To say appearing on late night shows is selling out is a bit of a generalization.

Let's say you appear on like Letterman, Kimmel and Fallon because you got a new album out. Is that selling out? No...

What if you appear on one/some of them because you want to be seen on TV, and you're not promoting anything. Wouldn't that be a bit different?



Axl was blunt and direct at times in this interview, and I appreciate that candor, but to be quite honest, there are portions of this interview that I really am having trouble understanding what he's saying.  I don't have time to get into it now, but tonight I'm going to post some quotes and hopefully get a productive discussion going to analyze some of Axls ramblings.  I just start with one for now.

Did you break up the old Guns?

It is my belief that the commitment to end old Guns came long before the band started in the heart and soul of one man.

So is he implying that Slash intended to breakup the band before they even started?


It might mean that the person in question has the kind of destructive personality that would make it impossible to keep the band together for a long period of time?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:25:32 PM
That isn't even the point though Jarmo

U are famous, u are an entertainer, so normally, that is what entertainer's do. they go to parties, they give interviews, they do shit.


As someone else said, if Axl doesn't want to do those things, All power to him and that is great for him. I don't think people who are into that, should be insulted and treated a certain way cause they enjoy going out and interacting.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 02:28:39 PM
I think people get themselves into trouble making statements like Jim Bob just did.


if you think i'm getting myself into trouble, i think you need to work on your reading comprehension skills.

If Axl wants to go on Conan, that would be cool.   There is nothing wrong with promoting your product.   I'd love to see CD get more promo.

If Axl wants to make a commerical for toyota or appear on stage with miley cyrus, I would call him a media whore too.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 02:30:35 PM
That isn't even the point though Jarmo

U are famous, u are an entertainer, so normally, that is what entertainer's do. they go to parties, they give interviews, they do shit.


Haven't you noticed that a lot of entertainers aren't seen when they don't have anything to sell while others will cling onto the spotlight no matter what?

Some do it because it's part of their work. They have to promote their new movie on talk shows, they have to talk to the press etc. Then you have others who do it because they want to be seen.

You know the kind of people who will alert the paparazzi of where they'll be so they can get their picture in the magazines? People who attend events knowing that the photographers will be there.

That's the difference.

At the end of the day, it's about integrity.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:30:40 PM
Fair enough : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:32:39 PM
That isn't even the point though Jarmo

U are famous, u are an entertainer, so normally, that is what entertainer's do. they go to parties, they give interviews, they do shit.


Haven't you noticed that a lot of entertainers aren't seen when they don't have anything to sell while others will cling onto the spotlight no matter what?

Some do it because it's part of their work. They have to promote their new movie on talk shows, they have to talk to the press etc. Then you have others who do it because they want to be seen.

You know the kind of people who will alert the paparazzi of where they'll be so they can get their picture in the magazines? People who attend events knowing that the photographers will be there.

That's the difference.

At the end of the day, it's about integrity.




/jarmo


I just don't think Slash fits that description. Slash was at the Oscars right? Well, he did play the original music for the movie "The Wrestler" so he was invited by those people I am sure.

If he does some charity benefit, that is great doing stuff for charity

if he is promoting Guitar Hero III, that is great and nothing wrong with it.

I've never heard of him alerting paparazzi and doing stuff just to be "Seen" they did turn down the Rockstar TV show on CBS which would've gave them a shit ton of exposure etc.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: PolarBearWitchHead on February 27, 2009, 02:32:50 PM
why do ppl hate on Fergie, she is pretty high on the food chain in what she does.  she is A list


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 02:33:14 PM
Axl has said numerous times, he doesn't go around drawing attention to himself unless he has something to promote.

Thats why we didn't really see or hear from him between 2002 and 2006.   Then just months before the shows in 06 were announced, Axl starts to make appearances.

Now he is promoting himself again, and the album is out.   Hopefully they are working on a tour too.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:33:29 PM
why do ppl hate on Fergie, she is pretty high on the food chain in what she does.  she is A list

Have u heard her music?

Nuff Said


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: PolarBearWitchHead on February 27, 2009, 02:36:15 PM
why do ppl hate on Fergie, she is pretty high on the food chain in what she does.  she is A list

Have u heard her music?

Nuff Said
yeah and i've seen her live, she was excellent.  u don't have to fall asleep every nite staring at her poster and listening to her album to acknowledge she is in the top tier


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 02:38:35 PM
Did anyone fully understand that part about being in a reunion in an "ambush" situation? Did Axl really think Slash was going to run out on stage at the Hard Rock unannounced and just start playing with the band? That seems wildly paranoid to me.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 02:40:02 PM
Axl was blunt and direct at times in this interview, and I appreciate that candor, but to be quite honest, there are portions of this interview that I really am having trouble understanding what he's saying.  I don't have time to get into it now, but tonight I'm going to post some quotes and hopefully get a productive discussion going to analyze some of Axls ramblings.  I just start with one for now.

Did you break up the old Guns?

It is my belief that the commitment to end old Guns came long before the band started in the heart and soul of one man.

So is he implying that Slash intended to breakup the band before they even started?

I read it as it was fated that they shouldn't stay in a band even before they met.
the band was started in the heart and soul of the leader.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 02:44:09 PM
I just don't think Slash fits that description.

Ok.

I think your opinion has been pretty clear for a long time.

Which is why you asked in the first place.


It's not that you didn't know why people think he was an attention seeking media whore, it's just that you don't agree.


Did anyone fully understand that part about being in a reunion in an "ambush" situation? Did Axl really think Slash was going to run out on stage at the Hard Rock unannounced and just start playing with the band? That seems wildly paranoid to me.

Could be more like "Slash showed up with a guitar ready to play so why would Axl say no" kinda thing....



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 02:48:47 PM
Slash may be creating a brand name for himself the way Snoop Dogg did since he's no longer in GNR and even VR seems to have run its course.

Remember when Snoop first came out with Dre and he was this cool, laid back, gangster rapping about real life shit. Then he turned into this ridiculous cartoon character drinking out of pimp cups and saying "fo shizzle my nizzle" for any ad that paid him a buck to do it. I'm sure Slash may have a bit more integrity than that but he needs to watch his step.

And I know this was a bit off topic.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:55:10 PM
Did anyone fully understand that part about being in a reunion in an "ambush" situation? Did Axl really think Slash was going to run out on stage at the Hard Rock unannounced and just start playing with the band? That seems wildly paranoid to me.

that part is very interesting though.

Jarmo, I see where u guys are coming from and I can see how some of the stuff he does can be considered media whoring. I just don't think he does stuff just to be seen or whatever. Most of the time, he has something going on that validates being out and about.


The Fergie thing............... She does seem like a genuine friend of Slash's............. I personally cringe everytime I hear the woman.

Slash isn't anywhere on that Snoop level yet.  Snoop was at the CMA awards for Christ's sake.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: PolarBearWitchHead on February 27, 2009, 02:56:01 PM
on topic about having the right to say what they want..

tbh, outside of the concerts/ records they release, i could care less about slash and axl on a personal level.  Imo, they are both kinda flakes

but to label either as a media whore or a hermit is a little extreme.  axl has a right not to make appearances any more, he has a right to say Yes or No.  same with slash, he is a guitar player, if he wants to get up and do appearances on a country record or a perform on stage with beyonce or go to a movie premiere on a thursday night, i think both guys kinda earned the right to say yes or no to w/e they want or dont want to do


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SirTed on February 27, 2009, 02:57:24 PM
Here's what's kind of pissing me off right now. I feel like if Axl had not addressed his side of the story from the old days people would be saying he was dodging the questions (probably because he's guilty right?) So instead the man stands by what he says and people say he needs to move on?

These are the questions and answers that we've been waiting for for 10 years people.

That doesn't mean that I wouldn't want to hear more about the new band and new music though. But hell, I could've used a longer interview. I'm a fanboy though, I'm both really easy to please and impossible to please at the same time.  

Thanks to Axl and Del for taking the time.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 02:59:23 PM
^

I just don't like the bashing on either end

If Slash bashes Axl, I don't like it and vice versa.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: wadey on February 27, 2009, 03:00:33 PM
Thanks for the interview Axl

..............its a shame people have to rip it to bits and disect it to fit different meanings though, But i guess that will never change.....its gives all the whiners something to swing their handbags at !!!!

 :peace:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 03:02:27 PM
Jarmo, I see where u guys are coming from and I can see how some of the stuff he does can be considered media whoring. I just don't think he does stuff just to be seen or whatever. Most of the time, he has something going on that validates being out and about.

Then he has succeeded. He can keep doing it and his image of being this cool character is intact.


Here's what's kind of pissing me off right now. I feel like if Axl had not addressed his side of the story from the old days people would be saying he was dodging the questions (probably because he's guilty right?) So instead the man stands by what he says and people say he needs to move on?


Exactly. He can never win with some fans.






/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 27, 2009, 03:02:40 PM
^

I just don't like the bashing on either end

If Slash bashes Axl, I don't like it and vice versa.

I think the point needs to be made LOUD and CLEAR.    There will be no reunion of the AFD or UYI lineups.      If this is what Axl has to do to get it thru some people's thick fucking skulls, so be it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 03:05:26 PM
The thing is though Jim Bob. I don't think anything he says will matter.  People are still gonna fantasize and believe what they want cause things do change over time.

U look at how many times Van Halen swore they'd never reform and how much they hated each other, same with The Eagles etc.

Axl, should say no, it isn't happening, take the high road like he did on Eddie Trunk and then push this version of GNR and the CD.

All this bashing etc doesn't help. it makes him look worse IMO.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 03:07:41 PM
no it doesn't. Some people are so into Old Guns promotion.

well said SirTed.

Robin in the style of Stevie Ray Vaughan must be sick.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on February 27, 2009, 03:12:46 PM
I honestly think alot of people here just have a vendetta against certain people just because they don't see eye-to-eye with Axl. For instance, it's all high & mighty saying "Slash is a media-whore" and that he is doing all this to higher his profile. Ever think maybe he was obligated to attend those events or that some might have been due to Perla having something to do with the certain thing.

Your all saying oh I would never do such and such he is just doing it for the money. Well even if it were financially motivated, its all fine saying that you would reject on a bloody forum but faced with the choice why not help sercure your family finances, everyone would do it in a heartbeat.

I just think certain people are just hell bent on defending Axl to be correct 100%, everybody lies he & Slash are certainly no exception. Whatever anybody does in their lives are their own choices and who are we to critizise them, they don't have to answer to us.

I gotta say D has it spot on here and is actually the voice of reason. Jarmo no offence to you I think your a great guy but I feel you can sometimes add fuel to the fire if someone makes a certain remark about Axl.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 03:18:45 PM
I just don't like how Axl defenders think everything he says and his versions are 100 percent truth and it can be said for Slash defenders as well.


Neither of these guys are angels.

I've read too many interviews from former band members, managers, etc and unless the entire world has some vendetta and hatred against Axl, he is not without fault in this situation.





Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SlashRock on February 27, 2009, 03:56:53 PM
Not a bad publicity stunt Ax. This is certainly a way to drum up some attention for the new record.

Not sure its the right way to go about promoting it though.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 03:57:44 PM
Despite what all of our opinions are, it's always interesting to get a new interview and something to discuss.

It becomes more and more clear that Axl really isn't proud of the UYI material at all. Sure, they were no Appetite but I think those albums really stand up even today. I think most of the public would agree too. I thought some of Axl's best lyrics were there also on songs like Locomotive, Coma, and Don't Damn Me. Could it be he was just never happy with the process in which they were made and where the band was at?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LeftToDecay on February 27, 2009, 04:16:44 PM
Geez.. can't seem to be able to throw a stone these days without it landing on an Axl Rose Interview.
He is such a MEDIA WHORE.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: MeanBone on February 27, 2009, 04:29:09 PM
Well, for me, i don't really get it how neither Axl nor Slash seem to take responsibility for their actions. Slash is too busy trying to be portrayed as the victim and nice guy, while axl just loves to give hell to everyone and say how he never did anything wrong and everyone was just out to get him, which may be true regarding some aspects, but in others he just sounds like a mad man ranting in the rain. and i'm just calling it as i see it.

I don't really trust one or another. first of all because everyone lies to save their ass, and it amuses me to see how some people in here just takes sides based on what either slash or axl recollects from the breaking of the band or their continued battles. it's just non sense. To put aside rational thinking and trusting someone else's version of events is just silly and makes me laugh or think you guys are "cucu" and are taking this a little too far.

the way i see it, axl came off harsh, because, if i read correctly he tried to bring slash down on his playing, and slash may be a lot of things, but he's a damn guitar legend for sure. you can't take anything from him, even if you don't appreciate his last projects. because, all things considered, the same thing could be told about axl, a lot of people hate him for his change in musical style, however i still see him for what he is, a great performer, even with all his faults.

i find it ridiculous that many can't really see the difference between liking the music and liking the musician himself. i love gn'r, old and current version, but i don't really know them, the only three people that seem, from interview,s i could be friends with are duff, bumble and Robin, and that's just based on how they come off, but that's just a big assumption on my part and i take it for what it is. All the others i can't really tell. but i don't make an effort to try to take sides or like someone else's view on the world or people. We are music fans, we like the music. these things are the ugly part of music.

i loved reading Axl's take on all of it, and it's his side and it's a valid point of view. but at the end of the day, i couldn't care less. i like the current gn'r and i like the music and that's all that matters.

if  i could or should make a remark about his interview, i'd only ask him to spend more time talking about his current band members, the process of recording, how they get along, how it's like to share the studio with them and letting them do interviews as well, because the past is buried and it's gonna be that way, but the current incarnation of GN'R needs more press and attention. they don't even have a video for god's sake.

But i do get why this is so important for axl, he did keep himself quite for so many years, it's his turn to speak.

but let's not forget, for anyone to try to really say what happened between Axl and Slash and who's wrong or Right, is just crazy. it strictly depends on who you believe, but given the fact that they're both trying to save their asses in the press, i 'm not gonna take any sides cuz none of this is objective, nor relevant.


the cool part of the interview for me was Robin has an interest to tour with them and he has a solo that sounds like SRV, now that's something i like to hear.

hopefully we'll see them tour this summer and many of us htgth members will meet again and enjoy the great time it was back in 2006 in europe.

Cheers


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: FunkyMonkey on February 27, 2009, 04:34:36 PM
From Rolling Stone...

Axl Rose?s second official post-Chinese Democracy interview hit the internet today as the Guns n? Roses frontman talked with Spinner about his new album, why the group?s original lineup dissolved and why he?ll never reunite with Slash. Even though the interview was conducted by Rose?s good friend and Guns road manager Del James, the questions definitely aren?t softball and, as usual, Axl doesn?t hold anything back.

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/02/27/axl-rose-calls-slash-a-cancer-in-new-chinese-democracy-interview/


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LordRazZ on February 27, 2009, 04:37:23 PM
I think he finally bit that Slash question right in the ass, killed it, buried it, and hopefully, it'll never see the light of day again.

Slash who? Exactly...

Thanks for another great read Axl.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Ali on February 27, 2009, 04:38:27 PM
From Rolling Stone...

Axl Rose?s second official post-Chinese Democracy interview hit the internet today as the Guns n? Roses frontman talked with Spinner about his new album, why the group?s original lineup dissolved and why he?ll never reunite with Slash. Even though the interview was conducted by Rose?s good friend and Guns road manager Del James, the questions definitely aren?t softball and, as usual, Axl doesn?t hold anything back.

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/02/27/axl-rose-calls-slash-a-cancer-in-new-chinese-democracy-interview/

I agree, the questions weren't softball at all.  People just would like to say that because Del conducted the interview.

Ali


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 04:42:09 PM
I find it funny how Axl can knock Izzy for being unpredictable when Axls whole career is built on being unpredictable.

And most importanly...I find it troubling that Axl is downplaying how much material they have after CD. He has boasted numerous times how they have been working on a lot of material. In London, he said that there were 3 albums worth of material.

Now all of a sudden there isnt that much there? While Del didnt give a softball interview, I would have liked to see him press a lil more with some of the responses..., the next question should have been, what the hell have you been working on all of these years?
I was under the impression that they spent years and 12+mil on CD and other albums. I always said that when the media reported that CD cost all that time and money they werent painting the full picture because there was 1-2 other albums, atleast 1 more, in the can ready after CD....which justifies the cost and time

The interview opens up with them talking about how Axl didnt intend on creating a masterpiece or dwelling on the fact that he had or wanted to make this masterpiece. Well if thats the case, then why did you spend 14mil and all of that time on 1 album?

That part about the material with Baz really bothered me. I dont understand the downplaying when all of these years he has said that atleast 1 other album would be ready after CD. The media and fans are only going to care about what he said about Slash and the old band but as a fan of the new band and Axl himself...this bothered me the most



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 04:43:01 PM
Definitely gotta give props to Del. There were some really good questions in there.

I always said how I'd never want to meet my heroes out of fear of them not being cool or whatever.


same goes with this. I find all the bashing to be depressing.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 04:44:08 PM

Yeah, I wasn't talking about the journalist asking the questions, after all I'm sure Del James could've asked any question Axl wanted him to.  I was more referring to the radio stations and other media that will pick up on this interview.  If 80% of the interview was about CD and just 20% was about the old band, guess what they'd report on?  I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't be CD.

But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

Ha....check out the title of the Rolling Stone article


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 04:47:01 PM
damn you've guessed it.

"Guns N' Roses' Axl Rose says Slash is "a cancer"--http://uk.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUKTRE51Q2WA20090227
"Axl Rose Calls Slash a ?Cancer? in New ?Chinese Democracy? Interview" ---RS

I just don't like how Axl defenders think everything he says and his versions are 100 percent truth and it can be said for Slash defenders as well.

I just love how we aren't counted among the entire world.

What axl comment in the interview is a lie? enlighten us as we're out of the world.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layflats on February 27, 2009, 04:48:19 PM
More rock , less talk.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: BurningHills on February 27, 2009, 04:49:12 PM
Awesome interview!  : ok:

It's always good to see Axl lay down the law and tell it like it is.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 04:51:28 PM
I find it funny how Axl can knock Izzy for being unpredictable when Axls whole career is built on being unpredictable.

And most importanly...I find it troubling that Axl is downplaying how much material they have after CD. He has boasted numerous times how they have been working on a lot of material. In London, he said that there were 3 albums worth of material.

Now all of a sudden there isnt that much there? While Del didnt give a softball interview, I would have liked to see him press a lil more with some of the responses..., the next question should have been, what the hell have you been working on all of these years?
I was under the impression that they spent years and 12+mil on CD and other albums. I always said that when the media reported that CD cost all that time and money they werent painting the full picture because there was 1-2 other albums, atleast 1 more, in the can ready after CD....which justifies the cost and time

The interview opens up with them talking about how Axl didnt intend on creating a masterpiece or dwelling on the fact that he had or wanted to make this masterpiece. Well if thats the case, then why did you spend 14mil and all of that time on 1 album?

That part about the material with Baz really bothered me. I dont understand the downplaying when all of these years he has said that atleast 1 other album would be ready after CD. The media and fans are only going to care about what he said about Slash and the old band but as a fan of the new band and Axl himself...this bothered me the most




Good point there YG. Axl has himself talked about 3 albums worth of material.

As someone on another forum stated, it didn't help having so many people call it AFD on steroids, Physical Graffitti mixed by Beck and Reznor. Best of Pink Floyd mixed with Zep.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 04:54:28 PM
damn you've guessed it.

"Guns N' Roses' Axl Rose says Slash is "a cancer"--http://uk.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUKTRE51Q2WA20090227
"Axl Rose Calls Slash a ?Cancer? in New ?Chinese Democracy? Interview" ---RS

I just don't like how Axl defenders think everything he says and his versions are 100 percent truth and it can be said for Slash defenders as well.

I just love how we aren't counted among the entire world.

What axl comment in the interview is a lie? enlighten us as we're out of the world.



Your question is hard to follow but lets see if I can interpret this:


Slash followers do nothing but blame Axl. I don't think Axl deserves all the blame as it must have been extremely difficult to deal with a heroin addict and a band full of junkies.


Axl followers and Axl himself takes no fault whatsoever but u just have so many versions from so many different people and I just find it hard to believe that every single person in the world is lying. Jesus, Even Bucket left, Robin has left twice......

Izzy even said in a Classic Rock article how the last straws were Axl wanting him to sign a paper and take a smaller percentage etc etc.


In any breakup, never is it only one person's fault.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 04:58:04 PM
I'm still lost on all that shit about Robert John and the guy's personal finances. Why that was necessary for anyone to know is beyond me.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: MeanBone on February 27, 2009, 05:01:51 PM
well i'm just curious who's to blame for philly, since Axl never has any fault of his own...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 05:05:02 PM
well i'm just curious who's to blame for philly, since Axl never has any fault of his own...

The Promoters of course


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 05:06:32 PM
well i'm just curious who's to blame for philly, since Axl never has any fault of his own...

The Promoters of course

Lakers game  ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 27, 2009, 05:09:47 PM
From Rolling Stone...

Even though the interview was conducted by Rose?s good friend and Guns road manager Del James, the questions definitely aren?t softball and, as usual, Axl doesn?t hold anything back.

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/02/27/axl-rose-calls-slash-a-cancer-in-new-chinese-democracy-interview/


axl: No. I said "loved," as in past tense. It was a misquote by a writer I mistook as a fan.

del is a much abler interviewer than that writer it seems.

I just find it hard to believe that every single person in the world is lying. Jesus, Even Bucket left, Robin has left twice......


No but slash lies.
Robin and bucket don't like the label very much and they don't say much.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 27, 2009, 05:25:15 PM
Last time it was "not before either of us dies" and now its "slash is cancer", oh what a crappy way to get headline news spot.
Whats next? "Slash planned mass genocide"?

Don't really know if it's intentional, but it definitely doesn't "clear it up" any more than being "polite" about it.
I'd understand this interview completely if it was made by some other media asking the same old questions, but I consider Del as a part of the "family" and them using their old friends to benefit for themselves is not cool (same goes for Slash & co really)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: BlowUpYourVideo on February 27, 2009, 05:39:10 PM
i find it ridiculous that many can't really see the difference between liking the music and liking the musician himself. i love gn'r, old and current version, but i don't really know them

Agreed. Rest of the post too. : ok:

We're all here because we're fans of a band's music. I think there's too much attention given to arguments and feuds and shit.

Though it's cool that we've heard from Axl a few times now recently. :yes:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LeftToDecay on February 27, 2009, 05:46:37 PM

Don't really know if it's intentional, but it definitely doesn't "clear it up" any more than being "polite" about it.
I'd understand this interview completely if it was made by some other media asking the same old questions, but I consider Del as a part of the "family" and them using their old friends to benefit for themselves is not cool (same goes for Slash & co really)

It's interesting that in a situation where Axl has total control of what gets talked about ( Interview with Del, Axl asking fans to ask about specific topic are both closer to  essays  written by Axl, rather than interviews)vast, vast VAST majority of things he chooses to speak of revolve around old guns.
Find an interview with Slash where some 75% of what he speaks about had been old guns.

Slash dares to mention Guns n' Roses in an interview and its "OMG WHORE WHOREING HIS ASS WTF???"
Axl gives an interview that is essentially all about old guns and its " Axl clearing things up" ;D



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on February 27, 2009, 05:49:19 PM
I just find it hard to believe that every single person in the world is lying. Jesus, Even Bucket left, Robin has left twice......


No but slash lies.
Robin and bucket don't like the label very much and they don't say much.

That's perhaps the most redundant post I've seen. Talk about living up to the stereotypes D was talking about.

Anyway, I think MeanBone has said it best. Very insightful.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 06:02:38 PM
I'm still lost on all that shit about Robert John and the guy's personal finances. Why that was necessary for anyone to know is beyond me.

Just another example of Axl "being the bad guy".

When it happened, it made headlines. Obviously.

But, as usual, the story behind it all wasn't important. The most important thing was that Axl ripped his friend off because he's the Antichrist!


Find an interview with Slash where some 75% of what he speaks about had been old guns.

Well the guy made a fucking book to "set the record straight" about GN'R....

So yeah, maybe his interviews aren't mostly about GN'R, but he made some money on it instead. I guess you prefer that.




And most importanly...I find it troubling that Axl is downplaying how much material they have after CD. He has boasted numerous times how they have been working on a lot of material. In London, he said that there were 3 albums worth of material.

Now all of a sudden there isnt that much there?

Maybe it's because certain people, no names mention/forgotten, like to take things out of proportion?

If he had said they have X albums worth of material, there'd be people saying "OMG! OMG! Can't wait for the next album!".

Thus, starting "the wait" all over again. Which is kinda stupid since the new album was released three months ago and the band hasn't toured behind it yet.....


So maybe he wishes to focus on Chinese Democracy right now.

Isn't that what you want?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 27, 2009, 06:25:56 PM
I'm still lost on all that shit about Robert John and the guy's personal finances. Why that was necessary for anyone to know is beyond me.

Just another example of Axl "being the bad guy".

When it happened, it made headlines. Obviously.

But, as usual, the story behind it all wasn't important. The most important thing was that Axl ripped his friend off because he's the Antichrist!



Ok, I must have completely missed whatever headline that was.  Will go look it up....


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Howard2k on February 27, 2009, 06:32:50 PM
That isn't even the point though Jarmo

U are famous, u are an entertainer, so normally, that is what entertainer's do. they go to parties, they give interviews, they do shit.


Haven't you noticed that a lot of entertainers aren't seen when they don't have anything to sell while others will cling onto the spotlight no matter what?

Some do it because it's part of their work. They have to promote their new movie on talk shows, they have to talk to the press etc. Then you have others who do it because they want to be seen.

You know the kind of people who will alert the paparazzi of where they'll be so they can get their picture in the magazines? People who attend events knowing that the photographers will be there.

That's the difference.

At the end of the day, it's about integrity.




/jarmo


I don't buy a word of that.  I don't believe for a second that even Axl would have released Chi Dem for free.   It's about money.  Maybe it's more important to some than others.  But it's about money. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: chineseblues on February 27, 2009, 06:38:48 PM
I'm still lost on all that shit about Robert John and the guy's personal finances. Why that was necessary for anyone to know is beyond me.

Just another example of Axl "being the bad guy".

When it happened, it made headlines. Obviously.

But, as usual, the story behind it all wasn't important. The most important thing was that Axl ripped his friend off because he's the Antichrist!



Ok, I must have completely missed whatever headline that was.  Will go look it up....

It happened back around 2002. Robert went to all the guys in the old band to see if they wanted to buy the pictures because he was having money problems. All the other guys said they didn't want them. Axl bought them and when Robert didn't get the money  ASAP he sued Axl saying he stole them or something.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 06:45:28 PM
I don't buy a word of that.  I don't believe for a second that even Axl would have released Chi Dem for free.   It's about money.  Maybe it's more important to some than others.  But it's about money. 

You don't?

I think the record company would've been more pissed...  :hihi:




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 07:00:26 PM
Quote
Maybe it's because certain people, no names mention/forgotten, like to take things out of proportion?

If he had said they have X albums worth of material, there'd be people saying "OMG! OMG! Can't wait for the next album!".

Thus, starting "the wait" all over again. Which is kinda stupid since the new album was released three months ago and the band hasn't toured behind it yet.....


So maybe he wishes to focus on Chinese Democracy right now.

Isn't that what you want?

"Now, there's been some concern... that if we play 5 or 6 new songs, then there can't that many more on the album. Au contraire mon fr?re! We're just playin' the songs we're not considering putting out as singles or anything. So you'll get 18 songs and about 10 extra tracks. And when that... when the record company feels that has run [it's] source, then you'll get it all over again. And by that time, I should be done with the 3rd album! So we'll see if all goes well boys and girls!"

No one took anything out of proportion. Axl and the band have said countless times that they were working on multiple albums not just CD.

Now its a problem if people wonder about follow up material? Geeezzzz.

To blame anything on Baz' big mouth is absurd. It came straight from Axl.

I have always thought it was unfair for the media and fans to say that Axl was spending all this time and money on just CD. I would say, well if you put your agenda aside you would realize that they have made 2-3 total albums counting CD. Which certainly justifies the time and cost. But if that is not the case then that is troubling and contradicts the first few questions of the newest interview.

You are right, I want Axl to start focusing on CD. He still hasnt done that. When the videos are made and released, and they hit the road is when the CD era will begin. When I hear interviews from Axl and the band about the making of CD, the present, and the FUTURE then Ill be totally happy.

Axl has told his story about the old band, now we can move on. And I think everyone here wants that and is looking foward to that.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: IKnowWhereIAM on February 27, 2009, 07:15:10 PM
You know, I am starting to get almost as tired of the world vs. Axl stories, as I am of the reunion stuff.   I get his point, and I don't blame Axl for having an obvious complex about it, but being the selfish fan that I am - I want tour dates, or at least discussion about the album.  Slash sucks, everyone but me is to blame for CD delay/release, I hate all my old music, and one by one, everyone who enters Axl's life lets him down or stabs him in the back - save for the loyal few...I would save that for the 'tell all' book (guarranteed bestseller) - or let sleeping dogs lie...it may be too late to convince most non-fans that he is not the bad guy anyway.

More music, tour dates, talk about the music!  Thats my advice (1 of 1 Billion I am sure).  : ok: 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 07:28:50 PM
Quote
may be too late to convince most non-fans that he is not the bad guy anyway.
that ship has sailed. He has no shot of winnning any substantial public support. Mainly because no one cares either way. He shouldnt even care. Its cool for him to tell his side once. Thats fine. But hopefully this wont be a theme with every interview/press release.

but its going to be hard to avoid because
1) people will always ask
2) his first major interviews or comments after all of these years are about the old band...so this will open the floodgates to even more future questions


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 07:29:28 PM
No one took anything out of proportion. Axl and the band have said countless times that they were working on multiple albums not just CD.

I know what he said in 2002.

So what's the problem with focusing on the CURRENT album instead of starting all the talk about future releases now?

Isn't that what you wanted? Less talk about anything non-CD related?

And now you're upset because he doesn't wanna talk about the follow-up?



Wait, are you gonna say you've waited for the Chinese Democracy follow-up album since 2002? Because in 2002 he said [insert quote about multiple albums here]?  :hihi:



But if that is not the case then that is troubling and contradicts the first few questions of the newest interview.

You're looking for contradictions that aren't there.




Axl has told his story about the old band, now we can move on. And I think everyone here wants that and is looking foward to that.

Well you don't make that decision for "us".

If Axl wants to talk about the weather, he can.  :)




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Robman? on February 27, 2009, 07:35:25 PM
well i'm just curious who's to blame for philly, since Axl never has any fault of his own...

The Promoters of course

Lakers game  ;)

I'm pretty sure the 76ers were playing the Spurs that night.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 07:37:56 PM
Quote
I know what he said in 2002.
Hes said similar stuff along the way...

I dont care how long ago it was. he said it.

Just like he holds Slash accountable for what he has said/did in the past(like really in the past), we as fans can expect some accountability as well....yes or no?

Quote
So what's the problem with focusing on the CURRENT album instead of starting all the talk about future releases now?

Isn't that what you wanted? Less talk about anything non-CD related?

And now you're upset because he doesn't wanna talk about the follow-up?
Stop with the semantics. Im not asking Axl to talk about new material every second. I was surprised he down played the idea of there being more material in the can for a follow up.

And Jarmo, for the record, I want Axl to DO not Talk.....When Axl is out there doing stuff is when hes at his best.

Quote
You're looking for contradictions that aren't there.
Well if your not wrapped up in creating a masterpiece then why spend all that time and money on one album?

Quote
If Axl wants to talk about the weather, he can.  
And you would proceed to tell me how its a positive :hihi:



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 07:45:32 PM
Yeah, i just don't like how it is now Baz' fault the 3 to 4 album thing got started cause yeah, Axl was saying it WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY before Baz and I am sure Sebastian can count how many new songs he hears while listening.

That is my point. no responsibility for anything. Now to blame Baz for starting a "rumor" is just absurd.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: willow on February 27, 2009, 07:47:44 PM
As always I love what Axl has to say. The guy speaks the truth and thats what ends up pissing people off.
Most of the time the truth hurts so people tend to ignore it. You can ignore it but that doesn't make it go away. As a gnr fan we look high and low for any info. We probably go to the wrong places but its nice to see in the end Axl is here to set it straight.
Thanks man.
peace out
By the way I posted this at another board but I'll post it here too. As a woman may I just say I wish more men had Ball's like Axls!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 27, 2009, 07:54:02 PM
Yeah, i just don't like how it is now Baz' fault the 3 to 4 album thing got started cause yeah, Axl was saying it WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY before Baz and I am sure Sebastian can count how many new songs he hears while listening.

That is my point. no responsibility for anything. Now to blame Baz for starting a "rumor" is just absurd.

I honestly think Axl lied a tad bit there, probably to ease off with the anticipation and pressure for future releases.

You know, he probably learnt that lesson pretty well during the making of CD. Imagine what would've happen if he told theres two more albums waiting to be released on his backpack. It would just create unbearable pressure from everyone.  
And 'cause it's harder to believe why he would've lied back in 2002.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 27, 2009, 07:58:13 PM
As always I love what Axl has to say. The guy speaks the truth and thats what ends up pissing people off.
Most of the time the truth hurts so people tend to ignore it. You can ignore it but that doesn't make it go away. As a gnr fan we look high and low for any info. We probably go to the wrong places but its nice to see in the end Axl is here to set it straight.
Thanks man.
peace out
By the way I posted this at another board but I'll post it here too. As a woman may I just say I wish more men had Ball's like Axls!
Everyone thinks he speaks the absolute truth (atleast here) and that pisses people off.

Yeah, the truth hurts, on both sides.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 07:59:27 PM
Quote
You know, he probably learnt that lesson pretty well during the making of CD. Imagine what would've happen if he told theres two more albums waiting to be released on his backpack. It would just create unbearable pressure from everyone.  
And 'cause it's harder to believe why he would've lied back in 2002.

Wouldnt expectations be reduced and assumptions changed if he came out early and said that his plans are to make a few albums in the studio over the years not just one?

He could have said that and also said he wants to just hang in the studio and create at this point in his career.

Instead people have thought hes just some crazed out singer trying to make a perfect album all of these years....and its taken years and millions to do so.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 08:02:25 PM
Point is, I don't care who it is, no one ever tells the 100 percent verbatim truth.

I think u take a little of this side with a little of Axl's side, with a little bit of a neutral observes thrown in and its a culmination of many different things.


to say its all one side or the other's fault is just hard to believe and I really can't understand how anybody can do so.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 27, 2009, 08:05:10 PM
Quote
You know, he probably learnt that lesson pretty well during the making of CD. Imagine what would've happen if he told theres two more albums waiting to be released on his backpack. It would just create unbearable pressure from everyone.  
And 'cause it's harder to believe why he would've lied back in 2002.

Wouldnt expectations be reduced and assumptions changes if he came out early and said that his plans are to make a few albums in the studio over the years not just one?

He could have said that and also said he wants to just hang in the studio and create at this point in his career.

Instead people have thought hes just some crazed out singer trying to make a perfect album all of these years....and its taken years and millions to do so.



Good point.

Who knows how much it took out of him to release CD really. Maybe he hasn't decided if the wants to go through that again?
But you need to keep in mind if he says "I've got a few songs ready" it will probably be taken out of context to something like "I've got an album ready". And if he decides not to do it, it would be a shitstorm.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 08:05:43 PM
Hes said similar stuff along the way...

I dont care how long ago it was. he said it.

Yeah, and did he deny saying it?

To me it seems more like he just doesn't wanna think about it right now. Or say too much because some Younggunner might take what he said out of context.



Im not asking Axl to talk about new material every second. I was surprised he down played the idea of there being more material in the can for a follow up.

And I think I explained to you why it makes sense to me personally to downplay the follow-up record at this point.

I guess it just makes no sense to you. Which isn't surprising. Nothing I explain to you seem to make any sense (or you just ignore it).  :hihi:

It seems like you did get at least part of the point, but just refuse to let it go:

You are right, I want Axl to start focusing on CD. He still hasnt done that.

He got the album out didn't he? What was he focusing on then?  ???

So according to you focusing on an album means putting out videos and touring. Usually that comes after you've focused on making and releasing the album. Are you saying the actual making of an album and its release doesn't require any kind of focus from the artist? That the artist only starts focusing on the album once he/she goes on tour?

You seem to confuse focusing on promotion of an album with focusing on working on the album.

Two different things.

Axl's been focused on Chinese Democracy for a while now and he intends to keep that focus. So, maybe you want to save the next album talk until Axl and GN'R puts their focus on it?


I think I used the f-word enough there.....


And you would proceed to tell me how its a positive :hihi:

I would tell you that it's his choice and not much you can do about no matter how much you complain and wish for Buckethead's return.  :hihi:



Yeah, i just don't like how it is now Baz' fault the 3 to 4 album thing got started cause yeah, Axl was saying it WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY before Baz and I am sure Sebastian can count how many new songs he hears while listening.

You still don't get it.

Baz might've heard X amount of songs. Doesn't mean they have X amount of songs ready for release. Which is what was implied.


Remember when people thought Chinese Democracy would be a box set? This was like in October.... Surely you must remember.

Why do you think they would think that?



Everyone thinks he speaks the absolute truth (atleast here) and that pisses people off.

People think he lies because it contradicts what their idol(s) have been telling them.

Does it make it a lie? No.....

It's easier to say "Axl lies" than to deal with the fact that you've been lied to for years by your idol(s).



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Howard2k on February 27, 2009, 08:09:22 PM
I don't buy a word of that.  I don't believe for a second that even Axl would have released Chi Dem for free.   It's about money.  Maybe it's more important to some than others.  But it's about money. 

You don't?

I think the record company would've been more pissed...  :hihi:




/jarmo

Very true.  And I was probably a little harsh.  I'm not implying that Axl doesn't have integrity, not at all.   But to clarify - money makes the world go around.  Kids don't grow up wanting to be rock stars just because they want to contribute to the world's music collection.  They grow up wanting to be rock stars because they want to contribute to the world's music collection, and they want the sex, drugs, parties and other fame entanglements that go with it.   :)

Gene Simmons is a man of honesty in this regard.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 08:10:46 PM
Thats fine Jarmo but he should come out and say that I mis spoke back in 2000 whatever it was and I am focusing on CD and we will worry about other albums later instead of trying to make it out like Sebastian listened to some music one night and then went around shouting how Axl had 4 albums when it was Axl and others said that WAY before.

so I dont think its cool blaming that on Baz.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 08:12:04 PM
I don't buy a word of that.  I don't believe for a second that even Axl would have released Chi Dem for free.   It's about money.  Maybe it's more important to some than others.  But it's about money. 

You don't?

I think the record company would've been more pissed...  :hihi:




/jarmo

Very true.  And I was probably a little harsh.  I'm not implying that Axl doesn't have integrity, not at all.   But to clarify - money makes the world go around.  Kids don't grow up wanting to be rock stars just because they want to contribute to the world's music collection.  They grow up wanting to be rock stars because they want to contribute to the world's music collection, and they want the sex, drugs, parties and other fame entanglements that go with it.   :)

Gene Simmons is a man of honesty in this regard.


Isn't that what Axl meant by the 5 or 4 or however many appetite comments? I am sure Axl is in this to be successful. It is about the music but I don't think he wants to be a failure at it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Regibold on February 27, 2009, 08:14:17 PM
Sure enough, there's the article on Comcast.net

Axl: Slash is 'a cancer'

Nothing like not reading into what the interview's about.  ::)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 08:15:16 PM
Thats fine Jarmo but he should come out and say that I mis spoke back in 2000 whatever it was and I am focusing on CD and we will worry about other albums later instead of trying to make it out like Sebastian listened to some music one night and then went around shouting how Axl had 4 albums when it was Axl and others said that WAY before.

so I dont think its cool blaming that on Baz.

Oh man.

I think he even told Baz to stop saying that.

He's just making sure people are being realistic about it and explaining that what Baz said might've been a bit exaggerated.

That's all.


And now we got people attacking Axl for allegedly attacking Baz. It's just not there!





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 08:19:33 PM
Quote
So according to you focusing on an album means putting out videos and touring. Usually that comes after you've focused on making and releasing the album. Are you saying the actual making of an album and its release doesn't require any kind of focus from the artist? That the artist only starts focusing on the album once he/she goes on tour?

You seem to confuse focusing on promotion of an album with focusing on working on the album.

Two different things.

Axl's been focused on Chinese Democracy for a while now and he intends to keep that focus. So, maybe you want to save the next album talk until Axl and GN'R puts their focus on it?
Focusing on an album means making it,puting it out, and promoting it. So we are now just waiting for the last 3rd to kickoff so we can start the CD era.


Quote
He's just making sure people are being realistic about it and explaining that what Baz said might've been a bit exaggerated.
Make up your mind. Is Axl down playing future material because he wants to focus on CD or is Baz wrong and there really isnt any substantial follow up material?

Baz hasnt said anything that should be classified as exaggerated.

Quote
Baz might've heard X amount of songs. Doesn't mean they have X amount of songs ready for release. Which is what was implied.
In 2002 Axl said what I posted. His comments clearly indicate he has 1 if not 2 albums after cd that are ready to be released.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 27, 2009, 08:22:51 PM




Everyone thinks he speaks the absolute truth (atleast here) and that pisses people off.

People think he lies because it contradicts what their idol(s) have been telling them.

Does it make it a lie? No.....


It's easier to say "Axl lies" than to deal with the fact that you've been lied to for years by your idol(s).



/jarmo
People say "Slash lies" all the time (again, in here at least).

What pisses me of is, be it Slash's or Axl's corner, that what their idol claims is the absolute and only truth there ever was, even if it is with no more, or even less truth than what the other guy has said. All this just 'cause people have "chosen" a side to be, no matter what.
There is a bunch of people here who've done that(people who troll either the VR section or this section), they'd never agree with "the others", even if straight facts are under their noses, 'cause the other one just has to be an asshole.

I think it's cool to lean on the other side, but to just blindly agreeing with everything, like if there was a price for ruining shit is fucking retarded.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: cfcsfc on February 27, 2009, 08:32:03 PM
Christ, what a negitive interview.
It was exciting to see a new interview, but this is one I'd actually rather do without. It made Axl seem negitive, grumpy and somewhat of an ass in dodging questions and pretty much bitching about the media, 'fans', Slash etc. etc for the whole thing.
Also I would have thought that an interview between Del and Axl would be a bit more interesting and revealing than this. Del pretty much just asks stock-standard GnR questions- about the old band, the break up, new album etc. Not very interesting questions on Del's part.
Why not focus more on promoting the album in a positive way rather than go on about all the negitives.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 08:33:43 PM
Focusing on an album means making it,puting it out, and promoting it. So we are now just waiting for the last 3rd to kickoff so we can start the CD era.

But you just said he hadn't focused on the album and how you want him to:

I want Axl to start focusing on CD. He still hasnt done that.

And now you say focusing is also about making it and releasing it. Which he obviously has done.

So what is it? Has he focused on the album or not?

You're saying two contradiction things.

Which is what you're accusing Axl of. Ironic....

It's not easy discussing with somebody who says one thing only to say the opposite a few minutes later.




Make up your mind. Is Axl down playing future material because he wants to focus on CD or is Baz wrong and there really isnt any substantial follow up material?

Baz hasnt said anything that should be classified as exaggerated.


Make up my mind? Oh wow. This from the flip flop guy. See above.


Axl said he saw this project as a double album, that's two albums. Baz has mentioned there being more than two albums of material.

Some people thought the November 23rd release would be a box set with like three albums because Best Buy listed three versions at first.


One doesn't exclude the other.

Axl saying there's not as much material as Baz has said doesn't mean there's no songs recorded for a possible follow-up album.

Axl wanting to focus on Chinese Democracy does not mean there's no recorded songs either.


See, one doesn't have to exclude the other.


I'm starting to suspect some of these posts were made under the influence of something....





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GnR-NOW on February 27, 2009, 08:36:41 PM
For years Axl was silent, and everyone wanted him to talk. Now he's talking and people don't like what he's saying.


Chinese Democracy is out, and Axl is talking. The only thing important next is they tour in support of Chinese Democracy. No need to worry about another album right now.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 27, 2009, 08:41:28 PM
Quote
But you just said he hadn't focused on the album and how you want him to:


Quote from: younggunner on Today at 07:00:26 PM
I want Axl to start focusing on CD. He still hasnt done that.

And now you say focusing is also about making it and releasing it. Which he obviously has done.

So what is it? Has he focused on the album or not?

You're saying two contradiction things.

Which is what you're accusing Axl of. Ironic....

It's not easy discussing with somebody who says one thing only to say the opposite a few minutes later.
Until they promote the album the new era has not begun. Stop with the word games

Quote
Axl said he saw this project as a double album, that's two albums. Baz has mentioned there being more than two albums of material.
When has Baz mentioned there being more than 3 albums?

Quote
Some people thought the November 23rd release would be a box set with like three albums because Best Buy listed three versions at first.
Some people thought Slash was wearing a Bucket on his head at Rio
Some people have thought hundreds of things over the years in regards to this band

Nobody took those rumors seriously. Plus the media never picked up on it.

Quote
One doesn't exclude the other.

Axl saying there's not as much material as Baz has said doesn't mean there's no songs recorded for a possible follow-up album.

Axl wanting to focus on Chinese Democracy does not mean there's no recorded songs either.


See, one doesn't have to exclude the other.
If Axl doesnt want to talk about the follow up because he wants to focus on CD...ok fine...

but if there isnt any substantial material ready to be released for the next album than that is a major problem.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 08:42:19 PM
Yeah, I guess we should be happy with Axl interviews, but I like the laid back, funny, engaging Axl that was on Eddie Trunk

He just seems so bitter and angry in all these interviews and it bums me out to hear him seem so mad.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on February 27, 2009, 08:52:45 PM
D you are right, Axl seems bitter and angry. 

Jarmo, you are right, things do get taken out of context.

I find the interview positive in that we learn how he feels and negative in that it was a pretty shitty interview done by one of his best friends. 

I find his story contradicts Izzy's, Duff's, Matt's, Gilby's, Slash's, and sometimes Bucket's to be taken too seriously.  I do know they are all out of the band, doesn't mean they are all wrong.  I am sure Robin's name will soon be added to the list. 

I too wonder how you focus on an album that was released and not toured behind or played much.  He says he wants to focus on CD, but when asked about CD, he jumps back into Slash, or not being happy with UYI.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 08:54:32 PM
Until they promote the album the new era has not begun. Stop with the word games

Word games?

I just showed you how you contradict yourself and it's a word game? Sorry, it's not. Just trying to have a discussion with somebody who seems to confuse himself.

You say something that's the opposite of what I say, then when I ask you about it, you say something that's basically identical to what I said, when I point it out, I'm playing word games.

That's so classy.  :P


I know, just do the usual. Ignore it and act like it never happened.

 :)


When has Baz mentioned there being more than 3 albums?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFOL0izAGM4

He says "he's got four albums worth of material".

Now, that can obviously be twisted into meaning those albums are done and ready.




If Axl doesnt want to talk about the follow up because he wants to focus on CD...ok fine...

but if there isnt any substantial material ready to be released for the next album than that is a major problem.

If that was the case, it still wouldn't be a problem until they start focusing on that album.  :P




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Shoeboy517 on February 27, 2009, 09:12:43 PM
Putting aside all the Axl vs Slash drama, I thought his take on the drum sound on Illusions was dead-on.  I always thought those albums sounded somehow muffled and dead.  Great to hear him say that.  I'm not a Adler enthusiast, but Sorum was never right for the band.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Dead N' Bloated on February 27, 2009, 09:18:22 PM
I liked how he got into the tech side of the guitars and drums. Very interesting. I'd like to hear Chris talk about that stuff a bit more. He has a great musical mind and with Axl, make a great team.
I hope the next interview with Axl focuses a bit more on that side of things. Love reading about it.


 :peace:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: draguns on February 27, 2009, 09:31:09 PM
BOTH Axl and Slash have been and always will be an influence in my life. I was disappointed in reading this interview. I think Axl bashed Slash too much. I would like to see him focus more on CD, touring, the band, marketing the album, and putting out another album. I agree with D and youngergunner regarding this interview. I think Axl has the right to express his side of the story. However, I think there are always three sides to EVERYONE's story. Furthermore, there comes a time when you have to accept responsibility and accountability. Axl is  a 46 years old man and it just seems like he has not done so after reading this interview. I was surprised by his comments on Izzy and Duff as well.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on February 27, 2009, 10:26:06 PM
Damn, some people take this Guns N' Roses crap way too seriously!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Classic Case on February 27, 2009, 10:40:58 PM
maybe Axl was having a bad day


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 10:58:33 PM
maybe Axl was having a bad day

maybe Axl is just sick and tired of all those GNR "fans" that won't accept that there will NEVER be a reunion

maybe Axl hopes that if he says straight out, plain and simple, that "one will die before a reunion would happen" and "he's a cancer" that people will FINALLY STOP spinning that into somehow he's leaving the door open


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 11:03:17 PM
They are now showing this interview on AOL.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 11:10:15 PM
They are now showing this interview on AOL.

By "showing" you mean it's just posted there like it is here, right?  There's no video of it or anything like that, right?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 11:11:02 PM
They are now showing this interview on AOL.

By "showing" you mean it's just posted there like it is here, right?  There's no video of it or anything like that, right?
Right, I meant posted.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: cineater on February 27, 2009, 11:11:22 PM
Really sounded like Axl was having a bad day.  Doesn't sound like a man who has a passion for what he is doing which is so unlike the way Axl has sounded in the past.

Baz needs to call Axl and take him away some where.  Seems like the only time in that interview he perked up.

AOL has the same story, better picture.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 27, 2009, 11:23:15 PM
Really sounded like Axl was having a bad day.  Doesn't sound like a man who has a passion for what he is doing which is so unlike the way Axl has sounded in the past.

OY FUCKIN VEY!!!  HE'S TRYING TO TELL YOU TO GET OVER THE PAST!!!

"the people keep talking about it as if it's the end of the earth ... it's only a rock group that split up ... it's nothing important .. you know ... you have all the old records there if you wanna reminisce"   - John Lennon


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on February 27, 2009, 11:32:44 PM
Really sounded like Axl was having a bad day.  Doesn't sound like a man who has a passion for what he is doing which is so unlike the way Axl has sounded in the past.

OY FUCKIN VEY!!!  HE'S TRYING TO TELL YOU TO GET OVER THE PAST!!!

"the people keep talking about it as if it's the end of the earth ... it's only a rock group that split up ... it's nothing important .. you know ... you have all the old records there if you wanna reminisce"   - John Lennon
Thankyou for posting that, I was thinking the same thing this morning and I couldn't remember the exact quote.  : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 27, 2009, 11:33:35 PM
The more I read the past couple of interviews, I just don't think it is healthy for Axl to have this kind of animosity on his chest. He needs to find a way to get over the past cause he seems consumed by it in a lot of ways.

If he wants to repair whatever damage has been done to his reputation, there are a whole lot better ways than these tirade interviews.

I still would love to know exactly what it was Slash did cause from interviews I've read, Izzy and everybody else has been just as negative.

What bothers me is, Slash in 2009 isn't necessarily the Slash from 1996 or even 2004.

He has apologized many times in the press and has taken fault for a lot of his mistakes.

Axl doesn't have to reunite with him, but forgive and move on.

If he thinks it was SLash's "Lies" that damaged his rep... I'd say his rep was damaged WAY before that.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Classic Case on February 27, 2009, 11:34:04 PM
maybe Axl was having a bad day

maybe Axl is just sick and tired of all those GNR "fans" that won't accept that there will NEVER be a reunion

maybe Axl hopes that if he says straight out, plain and simple, that "one will die before a reunion would happen" and "he's a cancer" that people will FINALLY STOP spinning that into somehow he's leaving the door open
yeah and maybe some of the people that interview him should stop gettin into the same shit over and over, I just dont know why Del James came up with the same question, couldnt he think in something better?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Bodhi on February 27, 2009, 11:38:43 PM
I feel bad that Axl Rose has had to go through all this shit...People just judge him and call him an "asshole who destroyed GNR" and shit like that, but you can clearly see this shit has not been easy on him.  I couldnt even begin to fathom how difficult the past 15 years have been and apparently 20 years since it seems that these problems with Slash have always been there...I think a lot of people are really only interested in their own entertainment, thus the reason some people keep pushing for a reunion...All I can say is I have been following GNR since the early 90's and "Chinese Democracy" has been worth every second of the wait...Axl has put together a great, inventive, innovative album..whereas Slash keeps throwing out recycled riffs and posing for photographs with Fergie....I am glad that my loyalty has been on the right side all of these years... : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: western_chaos on February 27, 2009, 11:48:02 PM
Thanks for posting. Good read as always.

It's good axl set bach straight lol.  : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 27, 2009, 11:53:41 PM
The more I read the past couple of interviews, I just don't think it is healthy for Axl to have this kind of animosity on his chest. He needs to find a way to get over the past cause he seems consumed by it in a lot of ways.

If he wants to repair whatever damage has been done to his reputation, there are a whole lot better ways than these tirade interviews.

I still would love to know exactly what it was Slash did cause from interviews I've read, Izzy and everybody else has been just as negative.

What bothers me is, Slash in 2009 isn't necessarily the Slash from 1996 or even 2004.

He has apologized many times in the press and has taken fault for a lot of his mistakes.

Axl doesn't have to reunite with him, but forgive and move on.

If he thinks it was SLash's "Lies" that damaged his rep... I'd say his rep was damaged WAY before that.



What makes you think you have any idea what he has had to deal with?

If you don't have any idea about it, what makes you think you have the "solution"?


Maybe it's just not as simple as reading a few interviews with lies?

Maybe something a person said in 1996 comes back to haunt you in 2006? How would you feel if you had shit thrown at you for years?

Maybe you have a bunch of so called fans against you because of all the shit that has been said about you for years?





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SterileEyes on February 27, 2009, 11:58:26 PM
What a completely unnecessary interview.

I'm on Axl's side with the whole Slash thing and I agree with everything he says - but he lets Slash win by talking like this and he just sounds bitter.

Sad. I thought there was a reason he stayed silent - it's called "having class and being the bigger man".

Also, the longwinded legalese answers have gotta go. He's not a lawyer or a politician. He's not even a high school graduate.

Stick to creating music and touring, buddy!  :beer:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:02:23 AM
There comes a time u have to just sweep the shit under the rug and move on with your life. Life is too short to be consumed with bitterness and hatred.

If Axl is 100 percent right, he is still letting those people win by allowing them to get under his skin like that. His last two interviews, he has sounded very upset etc and no person should carry that much around on their chest.


what's done is done, he can give 2 thousand more interviews, it won't change a thing. It also isn't like whatever Slash said is the reason he gets hated on etc so much.

That is most of my problem with this. no accountability whatsoever.

Like it was the people in Vancouver's fault, the guy in ST Louis' fault, the sound system in Montreal's fault, Philly's fault

It was bucket's fault a tour got canceled, its Baz' fault people think there are more albums, it's Slash's fault the old band broke up, its always somebody else.

When Izzy leaves and calls u Hitler in an interview, when Slash quits, Duff Quits.... U know, u may need to look in the mirror and ask yourself why?

Its like we are suppose to believe the entire world has a personal vendetta against the guy and he is just an innocent victim in all of this and I just don't buy that.



I mean can we get a little accountability here? Surely no one believes he is 100 percent blame free in anything right?

if so, I am gonna have to re examine how I think of some of u seriously.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: journey on February 28, 2009, 12:09:35 AM

Also, the longwinded legalese answers have gotta go. He's not a lawyer or a politician. He's not even a high school graduate.

Stick to creating music and touring, buddy!  :beer:

He's intelligent and successful and doesn't need pointers or direction from anyone on here.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:14:32 AM
Its like we are suppose to believe the entire world has a personal vendetta against the guy and he is just an innocent victim in all of this and I just don't buy that.

No, of course you're supposed to think that he's to blame for everything!

You know, stick to the the general idea that everything is his fault...  ::)



By your logic, if three people leave a group, it has to be the fourth guy's fault.

That's exactly what the problem is. Just because three people repeat the same story doesn't make it the truth.

You should know that.



That is most of my problem with this. no accountability whatsoever.

English, do you speak it?  :P

Quote
I'm generally blamed for the time it took to release 'Illusions,' but again the reality of my fault would be in not finding a way to manage Slash complete with his addictions and bring both him and Izzy together either similar to 'Appetite' or in some other progression more conducive to Guns than how 'Illusions' was accomplished. Unfortunately, that never truly happened, and both Guns and the public suffered for it. I'll take the responsibility in the sense that had I known how to achieve those goals we would have made what I feel would've been a more effective and powerful album at the time.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 12:15:25 AM
The more I read the past couple of interviews, I just don't think it is healthy for Axl to have this kind of animosity on his chest. He needs to find a way to get over the past cause he seems consumed by it in a lot of ways.

If he wants to repair whatever damage has been done to his reputation, there are a whole lot better ways than these tirade interviews.

I still would love to know exactly what it was Slash did cause from interviews I've read, Izzy and everybody else has been just as negative.

What bothers me is, Slash in 2009 isn't necessarily the Slash from 1996 or even 2004.

He has apologized many times in the press and has taken fault for a lot of his mistakes.

Axl doesn't have to reunite with him, but forgive and move on.

If he thinks it was SLash's "Lies" that damaged his rep... I'd say his rep was damaged WAY before that.



What makes you think you have any idea what he has had to deal with?

If you don't have any idea about it, what makes you think you have the "solution"?


Maybe it's just not as simple as reading a few interviews with lies?

Maybe something a person said in 1996 comes back to haunt you in 2006? How would you feel if you had shit thrown at you for years?

Maybe you have a bunch of so called fans against you because of all the shit that has been said about you for years?





/jarmo


No, we don't know what he's gone through or is going through.  But to refer to someone as "a cancer" is sad.  I also think it's sad that anyone would continue to hold grudges for 20 yrs and not seek some type of peace and forgiveness.    


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:16:13 AM
I have never said it is all his fault, I have been on his side about a lot of stuff but I definitely know he isn't innocent and some great amazing angel of a person who everyone tries to bring down and destroy.

He took responsibility for not being able to make a better UYI album. He didn't take any when it comes to fractured relationships and all that stuff. Riots etc etc etc


the point isn't who is right or wrong.

what I am saying is, he needs to let go of all that hostility.  Cause in the end, he is only hurting himself.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jazjme on February 28, 2009, 12:16:37 AM
 ::) Man it wasn't so long ago people missed Axl rants...  :hihi: Guess so long as it doesn't rub them the wrong way :drool:,,,, oh well get over it.  :beer:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:19:38 AM
::) Man it wasn't so long ago people missed Axl rants...  :hihi: Guess so long as it doesn't rub them the wrong way :drool:,,,, oh well get over it.  :beer:

no no, I love his rants, but I don't like this one in particular.  Demeaning a guy's playing which is ridiculous and then seemingly talking shit about his own previous works that are amazing whether or not he thinks so.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 12:19:56 AM
There comes a time u have to just sweep the shit under the rug and move on with your life. Life is too short to be consumed with bitterness and hatred.

If Axl is 100 percent right, he is still letting those people win by allowing them to get under his skin like that. His last two interviews, he has sounded very upset etc and no person should carry that much around on their chest.


what's done is done, he can give 2 thousand more interviews, it won't change a thing. It also isn't like whatever Slash said is the reason he gets hated on etc so much.

That is most of my problem with this. no accountability whatsoever.

Like it was the people in Vancouver's fault, the guy in ST Louis' fault, the sound system in Montreal's fault, Philly's fault

It was bucket's fault a tour got canceled, its Baz' fault people think there are more albums, it's Slash's fault the old band broke up, its always somebody else.

When Izzy leaves and calls u Hitler in an interview, when Slash quits, Duff Quits.... U know, u may need to look in the mirror and ask yourself why?

Its like we are suppose to believe the entire world has a personal vendetta against the guy and he is just an innocent victim in all of this and I just don't buy that.



I mean can we get a little accountability here? Surely no one believes he is 100 percent blame free in anything right?

if so, I am gonna have to re examine how I think of some of u seriously.


I think D makes a very good point. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 12:24:04 AM
some of you really need to get over slash.   all these years later, really its ok to move on.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:28:00 AM
No, we don't know what he's gone through or is going through.  But to refer to someone as "a cancer" is sad.  I also think it's sad that anyone would continue to hold grudges for 20 yrs and not seek some type of peace and forgiveness.    

Interesting how you know nothing about it but you're quick to point out what's sad.....

 ::)


I definitely know he isn't innocent and some great amazing angel of a person who everyone tries to bring down and destroy.

Once again, generalizations.

Nobody said anything about an angel. You just have to take everything to the extreme to prove your "point".


Open your eyes.

If you have never seen any bullshit about GN'R, then congratulations.



He took responsibility for not being able to make a better UYI album. He didn't take any when it comes to fractured relationships and all that stuff. Riots etc etc etc


Did he talk about riots etc etc etc. in this interview?

Which question was about the riots?


Talking of relationships, I seem to recall this other band featuring a guy in a top hat losing their singer. Must be Axl's fault!



what I am saying is, he needs to let go of all that hostility.  Cause in the end, he is only hurting himself.

Well maybe letting some steam out is the best thing...


But it's the usual. "Axl should shut up". "How dare he!"


I think D makes a very good point. 

Of course you do. The two of you who know nothing about what Axl has had to deal with are giving hm advice on how to live his life.

 :hihi:





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 12:29:27 AM
they're disgruntled slash fans.    thats really all it is.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on February 28, 2009, 12:31:22 AM
Slash isn't the only cancer, 'namsayin?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 12:32:04 AM
some of you really need to get over slash.   all these years later, really its ok to move on.

Well said.  Then again, the Slash topic keeps coming up in recent interviews.  I would agree, it's time to get over Slash and some of the things he may or may not have done.  It's time to move on.  I figure if the topics keep coming up in interviews then it's still ok to talk about it.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 12:32:39 AM
they're disgruntled slash fans.    thats really all it is.

Read my post. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:33:24 AM
some of you really need to get over slash.   all these years later, really its ok to move on.

Well said.  Then again, the Slash topic keeps coming up in recent interviews.  I would agree, it's time to get over Slash and some of the things he may or may not have done.  It's time to move on.  I figure if the topics keep coming up in interviews then it's still ok to talk about it.  

Yeah, like you ever stopped and only started due to the interviews!  

Oh wait, it's Axl's fault!  :rofl:


/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:37:46 AM
There was a poster on here from Utah that told me something once, and even though we aren't friends at the moment, I'll never forget it.


this is paraphrased cause I don't remember it verbatim

I was very negative and just mad at the world, hated everybody and everything and he made a lot of sense with something like "YOU control how you feel, how you act and how you let things affect you"

If someone wrongs u, u can hold it in and let it further ruin your life and your happiness, or you can let it go cause ultimately it is your decision.


I fuck that up all the time but u get the idea.

Axl is choosing to let all that still consume and affect him. He has a great new CD, a great new band, So rebuild the rep by going out and kicking ass in concert, do some shit to help somebody else out publicly like habitat for humanity or something and the stuff that happened would be an after thought.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 12:38:26 AM
No, we don't know what he's gone through or is going through.  But to refer to someone as "a cancer" is sad.  I also think it's sad that anyone would continue to hold grudges for 20 yrs and not seek some type of peace and forgiveness.    

Interesting how you know nothing about it but you're quick to point out what's sad.....

 ::)


I definitely know he isn't innocent and some great amazing angel of a person who everyone tries to bring down and destroy.

Once again, generalizations.

Nobody said anything about an angel. You just have to take everything to the extreme to prove your "point".


Open your eyes.

If you have never seen any bullshit about GN'R, then congratulations.



He took responsibility for not being able to make a better UYI album. He didn't take any when it comes to fractured relationships and all that stuff. Riots etc etc etc


Did he talk about riots etc etc etc. in this interview?

Which question was about the riots?


Talking of relationships, I seem to recall this other band featuring a guy in a top hat losing their singer. Must be Axl's fault!



what I am saying is, he needs to let go of all that hostility.  Cause in the end, he is only hurting himself.

Well maybe letting some steam out is the best thing...


But it's the usual. "Axl should shut up". "How dare he!"


I think D makes a very good point. 

Of course you do. The two of you who know nothing about what Axl has had to deal with are giving hm advice on how to live his life.

 :hihi:





/jarmo

You're right, I don't know anything about it, but I said it's sad, and it is.  For whatever reason it happens, holding bitter feelings enough to call someone a cancer has got to hurt inside.  For anyone.   It's not good to hold such negative feelings inside for so long.  

I don't know about Axl and his life and I'm not giving advice on how to live his life.  He can live it the way he wants.  All I sad is it's sad to feel that way for so long.

He can say whatever the fuck he wants.  I can respond like I want, as can you.    


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:40:18 AM
some of you really need to get over slash.   all these years later, really its ok to move on.

Don't tell Axl what to do. : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:43:01 AM
Ok now Axl is the only person in the world who has ever had somebody lie on him and treat him bad or wrong.

Jarmo, feelings are feelings. Axl's hurt and pain are no different than hurt and pain felt by millions of other people who have went through shit. Heartbreak, betrayal, those are emotions we all feel and I know from great experience that you can move on and better yourself, or u can let those things eat u alive.


I honestly no longer care about the whole he said, he said shit. cause we are never gonna know the real truth.

The more he stays consumed with Slash, the harder its gonna be for not only him but everyone else to move forward with what they are now.

There is nothing he can say that will change public perception. bashing and doing shit like this certainly won't help.


we know nothing about axl but u guys are the experts right? how does that work?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 28, 2009, 12:43:40 AM
yeah and maybe some of the people that interview him should stop gettin into the same shit over and over, I just dont know why Del James came up with the same question, couldnt he think in something better?
Even the usually Axl-bashing RollingStone disagrees with you on that point  ::)

From Rolling Stone...

Axl Rose?s second official post-Chinese Democracy interview hit the internet today as the Guns n? Roses frontman talked with Spinner about his new album, why the group?s original lineup dissolved and why he?ll never reunite with Slash. Even though the interview was conducted by Rose?s good friend and Guns road manager Del James, the questions definitely aren?t softball and, as usual, Axl doesn?t hold anything back.

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/02/27/axl-rose-calls-slash-a-cancer-in-new-chinese-democracy-interview/


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:44:09 AM
I give Del credit. he asked some good questions.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 12:45:27 AM
some of you really need to get over slash.   all these years later, really its ok to move on.

Well said.  Then again, the Slash topic keeps coming up in recent interviews.  I would agree, it's time to get over Slash and some of the things he may or may not have done.  It's time to move on.  I figure if the topics keep coming up in interviews then it's still ok to talk about it.  

Yeah, like you ever stopped and only started due to the interviews!  



Oh wait, it's Axl's fault!  :rofl:


/jarmo

I never said it was Axl's fault in regard to this particular interview or in anything I said up above.  I've said before that no one particular and sole person could be at fault.  Please don't put words in my mouth.

Yes I do defend Slash. So what?  You defend Axl.  So what?  We're told to "move on" and it's about GnR today.  That's a very good point because GnR is about the band today, right?  However, since former members who are interviewed keep talking about the past, then I'd say it's fair game for us to talk about it as well.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on February 28, 2009, 12:48:34 AM
I give Del credit.
I'm sure Del will sleep better tonight knowing you approve.  ::)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:49:42 AM
There was a poster on here from Utah that told me something once, and even though we aren't friends at the moment, I'll never forget it.

So you're the asshole! Can't be his fault....  :P

 :hihi:


You're right, I don't know anything about it, but I said it's sad, and it is.  For whatever reason it happens, holding bitter feelings enough to call someone a cancer has got to hurt inside.  For anyone.   It's not good to hold such negative feelings inside for so long.  

But he's not keeping them inside when he talks about them in an interview that's published is he?


That's the thing. He does not hold back.

Do you think he's stupid and doesn't realize that some of you won't like what he has to say and probably will feel offended and/or hurt?

Still he speaks his mind.

Like he always has.


Ok now Axl is the only person in the world who has ever had somebody lie on him and treat him bad or wrong.

Once again you start with the ridiculous generalizations!


Jarmo, feelings are feelings. Axl's hurt and pain are no different than hurt and pain felt by millions of other people who have went through shit.

Thank you Dr D!




we know nothing about axl but u guys are the experts right? how does that work?


Never claimed to be an expert. But I don't judge somebody who's shoes I have never walked in or had to deal with the kind of shit he has had to deal with.

I happen to think that since I don't understand everything, maybe I shouldn't be the one pointing fingers.



Yes I do defend Slash.

I don't think you need to be a member of Mensa to figure that out!





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 12:50:42 AM
Axl is getting this shit off his chest for the first time in years.

Let him say what he wants, no need to bitch that he doesn't like slash.   When I say move on, thats what I mean.   Theres no reunion in the works.  Slash hasn't been in the band for 13 years.  His fans who aren't interested in the present should find a VR board.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:55:32 AM
If this is what it takes for him to move on, then ok. but are we gonna get the same venom spewed stuff in every interview?

It isn't about being a doctor but everyone knows that if you let your enemy turn you bitter and angry,they continue to win. He shouldn't let them have that kind of power over him to make him feel that way anymore.

U have a great album, I wish he wouldn't let a small percentage of people upset him. If he reads the internet he should stop, cause the net is a cesspool for cynicism and negativity.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:57:39 AM
cause the net is a cesspool for cynicism and negativity.

Feeling guilty?  :hihi:



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jazjme on February 28, 2009, 12:58:25 AM
Perhaps he is over it, I mean damn if people didn't get it from the Billboard interview, and many obviously didn't. that reunion isn't gonna happen, and if being blunt and speaking harsh finally puts that aside great, sure I know its upsetting for many to hear, and you all feel like you know better, and that things can be done different, well , I dunno, live in his shoes. and then say what is right or not.

I don't think Axl is not to have some blame, but I don't think the intention was about that but more about people constantly creating BS and old band members talking reunion. And so sorry if he hurt your feelings by being as blunt as I can see how he feels about that .


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 01:01:36 AM
Axl is getting this shit off his chest for the first time in years.

Let him say what he wants, no need to bitch that he doesn't like slash.   When I say move on, thats what I mean.   Theres no reunion in the works.  Slash hasn't been in the band for 13 years.  His fans who aren't interested in the present should find a VR board.

That's not my point.  He can say what he wants.  That's fine.  I'm glad to hear him talk and hear his side for the first time in years.  I'm not bitching about that.  I just find it sad that there is so much bitterness after all these years.  That's not good for anyone.  

I know what you mean about move on.  There's no reunion in the works.  Yada yada.  I'll say again - and listen to me - I'm supposed to move on because I'm not interested in the present and find a VR board.  Whatever.  I try pretty hard not to get involved with the arguments over all this bullshit, here.  However, you can't tell me or anyone else to "get over it", when obviously some of the members of that almighty golden original line up have not gotten over it.  If they can still talk about it, then so can I.    


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:01:38 AM
cause the net is a cesspool for cynicism and negativity.

Feeling guilty?  :hihi:



/jarmo


 :hihi: :hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Shit I am tame compared to most people I've seen

Hell I was looking on yahoo at Summer movies and I saw a shit load of posts from people wishing Miley Cyrus would die!

I mean come on now, wishing death on a kid is pathetic.


I have a feeling a summer tour could be very interesting with some pretty damn good rants.

Shit we are a Slash response away from Biggie vs 2pac part deux


So is this why we don't get many UYI songs on tour cause Axl seems to hate how that album came out?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 01:05:26 AM
If they can still talk about it, then so can I.    

If it makes those people sad, doesn't it make you sad as well?  :P  ;)


The problem isn't liking the old albums. The problem is people who keep talking about the old band reuniting.

Who obviously haven't gotten the message...



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:08:58 AM
There was a poster on here from Utah that told me something once, and even though we aren't friends at the moment, I'll never forget it.

So you're the asshole! Can't be his fault....  :P

 :hihi:


HAHA shit, he and i are like the Two Coreys


same shit though, there are two sides and the truth is somewhere in the middle kind of like this IMO.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:10:04 AM
If they can still talk about it, then so can I.    

If it makes those people sad, doesn't it make you sad as well?  :P  ;)


The problem isn't liking the old albums. The problem is people who keep talking about the old band reuniting.

Who obviously haven't gotten the message...



/jarmo


I just wish we knew who he was addressing. I haven't heard anybody mention that since CD came out.......Granted I frequent here and GNRevolution only

so unless other places have that sort of shit........... Who has mentioned a reunion?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 01:12:43 AM
You're right, I don't know anything about it, but I said it's sad, and it is.  For whatever reason it happens, holding bitter feelings enough to call someone a cancer has got to hurt inside.  For anyone.   It's not good to hold such negative feelings inside for so long.  

But he's not keeping them inside when he talks about them in an interview that's published is he?


That's the thing. He does not hold back.

Do you think he's stupid and doesn't realize that some of you won't like what he has to say and probably will feel offended and/or hurt?

Still he speaks his mind.

Like he always has.

Yes I do defend Slash.

I don't think you need to be a member of Mensa to figure that out!





/jarmo

Come on, we all know Axl's never held back (well, except for a few years without interviews).  

No, I don't think he's stupid, at all.   Never said that.  I think he's held a grudge for too long.  I think he needs to move forward in life.  That's not advice - just what my feelings are, that's all.  

Am I offended or hurt?  No.  No more so than you or anyone else when I speak up on behalf of other members.

And the Mensa comment - funny.   And you defend Axl.  Again, so what?  It doesn't take someone being a member of Mensa to figure that out, either.  



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: PJ on February 28, 2009, 01:15:50 AM
everybody knows here im not into slash and the shits he have talked
but i really think that axl sounds bitter.. this interview (and the billboard one).. must have been perfect in 2004-2005 when the VR-boys were talking shit.. to clarify and  let the people decide what to believe... i really think axl had to clarify and tell his side of the history but now is too late!

i really enjoy axl and CD.. and that should be the focus.. not slash not past.. is too late to worry about the past.. it is time to see the future
to promote CD and tour a lot...  it is time to prove wrong the haters
  
axl is not perfect
axl is human being with defects.. you shouldnt take his words literally


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 01:20:03 AM
If they can still talk about it, then so can I.    

If it makes those people sad, doesn't it make you sad as well?  :P  ;)


The problem isn't liking the old albums. The problem is people who keep talking about the old band reuniting.

Who obviously haven't gotten the message...



/jarmo

I've heard and gotten the message.  I admit it's a thing I'd like to see one day - can't help it.  Whether it happens or not is not for me to say.  But talk of reunion is not even close to any point I was ever trying to make here.

And yes the whole situation does make me feel kind of sad.    


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 01:21:14 AM
I just wish we knew who he was addressing. I haven't heard anybody mention that since CD came out.......Granted I frequent here and GNRevolution only

so unless other places have that sort of shit........... Who has mentioned a reunion?

It's not only fans, it's the media as well:  Duff McKagan: 'Guns reunion could happen' (http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/a147117/duff-mckagan-guns-reunion-could-happen.html)

Just one example.

Notice how this is dated AFTER Axl's Billboard Q&A...




And the Mensa comment - funny.   And you defend Axl.  Again, so what?  It doesn't take someone being a member of Mensa to figure that out, either.  

You're right. Most sensible people who come here and see that this is a GN'R fan site should assume we support Axl and GN'R.

 :)



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 01:37:54 AM
I just wish we knew who he was addressing. I haven't heard anybody mention that since CD came out.......Granted I frequent here and GNRevolution only

so unless other places have that sort of shit........... Who has mentioned a reunion?

It's not only fans, it's the media as well:  Duff McKagan: 'Guns reunion could happen' (http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/a147117/duff-mckagan-guns-reunion-could-happen.html)

Just one example.

Notice how this is dated AFTER Axl's Billboard Q&A...




And the Mensa comment - funny.   And you defend Axl.  Again, so what?  It doesn't take someone being a member of Mensa to figure that out, either.  

You're right. Most sensible people who come here and see that this is a GN'R fan site should assume we support Axl and GN'R.

 :)



/jarmo

That's just it - the media helps promote the idea.  The media (even Del James-go figure about his questions) also continues to ask questions of any member of the original line up, whenever they are interviewed, about this whole topic.  Reunion, how you feel, etc.  It's a given.  So no one here can say that "he always talks about GnR - he can't get over it ".  It doesn't matter who was in that "original lineup" - any one of them gets the questions and that's why they end up talking about it. 

As for that last statement, there...well, yeah - obviously.  That's a given.  But it is a GnR fan site, right?  GnR.  That word, right there, encompasses a lot.  Right?     


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on February 28, 2009, 01:40:45 AM
Guess some think that to be a Gn'r Fan U have to only like members on the current line up what ever that is.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 01:52:02 AM
Guess some think that to be a Gn'r Fan U have to only like members on the current line up what ever that is.

no, nothing wrong with liking former members too.   but if you don't like the current band, you can't exactly call yourself a GnR fan in 2009.  You can say you were a fan of what GnR was.  And those people are better off not on a site like this meant to support GNR.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: The Dog on February 28, 2009, 01:58:22 AM
I've always been a HUGE Axl supporter.  I dig Slash, but Axl to me has always been the heart of GNR.  I always thought Axl could pull of a Guns album without Slash.  Some tracks on CD prove me right, but others are missing his sound/feel big time.

i think some comments in this interview are a few years too late though. Can't blame axl for being angry or not liking Slash.  Slash has said a lot of shit about axl.  but why now... why when CD is viewed as a flop, people want a reunion so bad and the non-die hard doesn't really hate slash, the average fan/person just wants the old band together.  As a big fan I GET why that won't happen, but it's not helping axl to talk so much shit.  take the high road.  i love the honesty and part of me likes the rock feud, but at the same time Guns and Axl aren't viewed so highly to the average person right now.

glad to hear axl talk about that stupid "bury appetite" comment.  always felt people took it waaaaaaay out of context. i also agree with him that something is missing from Slash's guitar playing.  I feel like SLITHER is the only good VR track guitar wise, the rest seems so uninspiring.  Slash Gun's work is MUCH better.

i think guns fans are just going to have to realize that what made the original band sooooo good was also what destroyed them.  these guys have serious issues and are some weird dudes.  put all those guys together and you have amazing music, but a crazy dysfunctional family.  I'm glad we got the music we got and the stuff that has come out post Illusions from both axl and slash.

weird and confusing how axl doesn't seem to know 100% if members of the band will be touring or are still considered to be "in the band".

lastly, i only read the interview once and kinda fast, but Axl is insane if he can't understand the amazingly high expectations for CD.  whether we as fans made them in our own head, or the stories of the millions it cost to make blah blah blah.  CD SHOULD have been the most amazing record ever.  it's good, but it could never live up to the expectations behind it and that is simply a matter of the amount of time it took to release it.

anyways, always great to get a good axl interview.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 02:18:00 AM
Guess some think that to be a Gn'r Fan U have to only like members on the current line up what ever that is.

no, nothing wrong with liking former members too.   but if you don't like the current band, you can't exactly call yourself a GnR fan in 2009.  You can say you were a fan of what GnR was.  And those people are better off not on a site like this meant to support GNR.

No. I disagree with that.  Totally and completely.  To say that if you don't like the current band you can't exactly call yourself a GnR fan in 2009 is not right.  GnR encompasses and is a lot of things through many years.  That includes a lot of fans on a lot of different levels.  To say that one is a fan of GnR just because of what they are today is wrong. 

One thing about GnR is that it has evolved and changed and included fans on many different levels.  If this site wants to be about GnR today then it should become that.  If and when it becomes totally and all about just today, then I'm gone.  I thought this site was about anyone and everyone who was ever in GnR.  Why have we now become only about today?  If it is, then I call it bullshit. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 02:26:10 AM
if you don't like guns n roses in its current form but like it in its past form, then you are a fan of what Guns N' Roses was.. not what it is.   Its pretty simple.   Its just calling it what it is.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: gilee7 on February 28, 2009, 02:40:55 AM
Damn. Just reading the interview and this thread has already stressed me out.

I think Axl and Slash just need to hug it out. Put them in a room together with some cameras and you have the most dramatic reality show of all time. (I'm sure Slash would be up for it! LOL.)

This is definitely the harshest I've seen Axl toward Slash. I was a bit surprised at his comments, but I think a lot of it has to do with Axl wanting to bury the reunion rumor once and for all. I'm also sad to say that I agree with what Axl says about Slash.

I mean, I love Slash. I always will just because of the great guitarwork he gave us in GNR. And as for this whole "media whore" thing, I got no problem with Slash making appearances and selling books and doing commercials and video games and all that. And as for him performing with so many artists, especially people like Fergie, well, if he likes her music, cool, perform with her . . . But I just have a hard time imagining Slash digging tracks like "My Humps" and "Fergalicious." The thing that pisses me off about Slash is that he doesn't seem to care about the music anymore. If he was doing all the "media" stuff and still coming up with kickass guitar solos, it'd be fine. But he's out there doing countdown shows on VH1 while putting out lazy, uninspired albums like Libertad. That's why a lot of us are angry at Slash.

Yeah, Axl takes a long ass time to make an album, but he puts his heart and his soul into it. I can understand if people don't like Chinese Democracy (actually, I can't, but everyone has different taste), but there's no way you can deny that Axl cares about his craft. He looks at music as art, not as a paycheck. He wants to maintain his integrity and release music he's proud of. I don't get that feeling from Slash. I listen to the VR albums and I can't believe that he's the same guy that played on "SCOM" and "November Rain" and "Estranged." As Axl said, where did it go?

Slash is uber-talented, but since leaving GNR he seems to be more about making money than about creating great art.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 02:43:32 AM
Listening to Chinese Democracy right now.   Smoking a fat joint.

I really want to hear that Robin solo Axl was hyping up  ;D


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jazjme on February 28, 2009, 02:59:56 AM
One thing that irks me is that people say move on, now for AXl cause they aren't happy with what he says recently.. and I think to myself.. growing up always sucking up the shit from people , taking abuse and blowing it off cause I know that if I keep moving on and doing what I feel right for myself , that despite that I should just stay silent . I just don't subscribe to that , its not as like I didn't get past it, and succeeded, its the fact that when people decide NO you cant say that you should just bury it never speak.. fuck that, these things come in degrees, and the higher profile you are looked at in a public forum the harsher the critics are to say shut up. WHY?  Its a bit liberating to say the things you held inside , when you feel its right for you to do so. And I know me I take shit, stay silent move on, and sometimes I feel ok now is the time to speak up and squash whatever people thought before cause , the games are over ..and there is nothing wrong with doing so. Friendships end , partnerships end. and some go on the offense , very early , and in turn really destroy any shred of repair.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on February 28, 2009, 03:32:47 AM
if you don't like guns n roses in its current form but like it in its past form, then you are a fan of what Guns N' Roses was.. not what it is.   Its pretty simple.   Its just calling it what it is.

What does it matter?  One can't be a fan unless they like GnR in it's current form?  Even Axl couldn't give an answer to what the current form is.  I'm not talking trash by saying that, I'm just saying that I'm tired of the sentiment around here that you can't be a fan unless you like the band for what it is now.  It doesn't matter.  Like I said, GnR encompasses a lot of things through the years, and to say that one can't be here unless they like the band in it's current form and totally support Axl (or Slash for that matter) in all he says, is a bunch of BS.  It is what it is.     


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Lourenco on February 28, 2009, 04:05:38 AM
Couldn't agree more about everything you wrote. Took the words right out of my mouth!  : ok:

Well, for me, i don't really get it how neither Axl nor Slash seem to take responsibility for their actions. Slash is too busy trying to be portrayed as the victim and nice guy, while axl just loves to give hell to everyone and say how he never did anything wrong and everyone was just out to get him, which may be true regarding some aspects, but in others he just sounds like a mad man ranting in the rain. and i'm just calling it as i see it.

I don't really trust one or another. first of all because everyone lies to save their ass, and it amuses me to see how some people in here just takes sides based on what either slash or axl recollects from the breaking of the band or their continued battles. it's just non sense. To put aside rational thinking and trusting someone else's version of events is just silly and makes me laugh or think you guys are "cucu" and are taking this a little too far.

the way i see it, axl came off harsh, because, if i read correctly he tried to bring slash down on his playing, and slash may be a lot of things, but he's a damn guitar legend for sure. you can't take anything from him, even if you don't appreciate his last projects. because, all things considered, the same thing could be told about axl, a lot of people hate him for his change in musical style, however i still see him for what he is, a great performer, even with all his faults.

i find it ridiculous that many can't really see the difference between liking the music and liking the musician himself. i love gn'r, old and current version, but i don't really know them, the only three people that seem, from interview,s i could be friends with are duff, bumble and Robin, and that's just based on how they come off, but that's just a big assumption on my part and i take it for what it is. All the others i can't really tell. but i don't make an effort to try to take sides or like someone else's view on the world or people. We are music fans, we like the music. these things are the ugly part of music.

i loved reading Axl's take on all of it, and it's his side and it's a valid point of view. but at the end of the day, i couldn't care less. i like the current gn'r and i like the music and that's all that matters.

if  i could or should make a remark about his interview, i'd only ask him to spend more time talking about his current band members, the process of recording, how they get along, how it's like to share the studio with them and letting them do interviews as well, because the past is buried and it's gonna be that way, but the current incarnation of GN'R needs more press and attention. they don't even have a video for god's sake.

But i do get why this is so important for axl, he did keep himself quite for so many years, it's his turn to speak.

but let's not forget, for anyone to try to really say what happened between Axl and Slash and who's wrong or Right, is just crazy. it strictly depends on who you believe, but given the fact that they're both trying to save their asses in the press, i 'm not gonna take any sides cuz none of this is objective, nor relevant.


the cool part of the interview for me was Robin has an interest to tour with them and he has a solo that sounds like SRV, now that's something i like to hear.

hopefully we'll see them tour this summer and many of us htgth members will meet again and enjoy the great time it was back in 2006 in europe.

Cheers


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: badobsession_r21 on February 28, 2009, 04:36:54 AM
i love that Axl doesnt hold back anymore. its been 14 years of silence and verbal abuse by Slash, Duff and even Matt Sorum for Christ's sake. it was about time he exploded.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sworrm on February 28, 2009, 04:44:58 AM
i totally agree that Slash is a media whore ive been saying it for years. People take the piss out of Axl for being the big rockstar but he aint been seen hardly for years. I remember watching Slash on Letterman doing cmon cmon do the locomotion with Carole King ha ha , i dont think you would catch Axl doing that, i fucking hope not


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: willow on February 28, 2009, 05:29:24 AM
As always I love what Axl has to say. The guy speaks the truth and thats what ends up pissing people off.
Most of the time the truth hurts so people tend to ignore it. You can ignore it but that doesn't make it go away. As a gnr fan we look high and low for any info. We probably go to the wrong places but its nice to see in the end Axl is here to set it straight.
Thanks man.
peace out
By the way I posted this at another board but I'll post it here too. As a woman may I just say I wish more men had Ball's like Axls!
Everyone thinks he speaks the absolute truth (atleast here) and that pisses people off.

Yeah, the truth hurts, on both sides.



I am not saying I believe everything Axl says but even people that no longer speak to him say he is very honest. I'll take their word for it. At least Axl can speak with half a brain. Not sure others can.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: willow on February 28, 2009, 05:32:00 AM
maybe Axl was having a bad day

maybe Axl is just sick and tired of all those GNR "fans" that won't accept that there will NEVER be a reunion

maybe Axl hopes that if he says straight out, plain and simple, that "one will die before a reunion would happen" and "he's a cancer" that people will FINALLY STOP spinning that into somehow he's leaving the door open

Amen. Sorry for the double post. I missed this.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: waxlrick on February 28, 2009, 06:32:47 AM
After all these years, Axl speaks........and deflects all blame to everybody else.

The more I read of his RARE interviews, the more respect I lose for him. Up til recently I was pro Axl all-the-way (as you can see from my sign on name). But the more he speaks, the more I struggle with his persistance in calling this project GNR. I have finally woken up! And I am embarrassed that it's taken me this long.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: gonella on February 28, 2009, 06:37:52 AM
I really don't understand why Axl is beating so much in Slash. Slash stopped to speak bad thing about him in end of 90'.  It seens some kind of revenge..

Its too much easy Axl speak good things about the NEW members, saying that they have a good relationship. But It's so easy to understand the reason, the new members do not have a personality, they rarely express themseff in public, there is few interviews of them.. or talking about the chinese democracy, when they talked, they talked about abstract things of the album just to avoid conflict with Axl.

In this way eveybody is friendly. :)):):)  

 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: waxlrick on February 28, 2009, 07:04:44 AM
I really don't understand why Axl is beating so much in Slash. Slash stopped to speak bad thing about him in end of 90'.  It seens some kind of revenge..

Its too much easy Axl speak good things about the NEW members, saying that they have a good relationship. But It's so easy to understand the reason, the new members do not have a personality, they rarely express themseff in public, there is few interviews of them.. or talking about the chinese democracy, when they talked, they talked about abstract things of the album just to avoid conflict with Axl.

In this way eveybody is friendly. :)):):)  

 

Exactly! If the new GNR members are such an improvement, then why the fuck can't Axl confidently state who is, infact, in the band at this time????? What a fuckin joke!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: cfcsfc on February 28, 2009, 07:18:37 AM
I just find it a bit funny that Slash has moved on in the press, answers questions about Axl tactfully and respectfully, and now Axl appears in the press again throwing shit. So much for being 'the stronger'.
I mean, he wants to move away from the old band- why bring them up at all, much less make statements like calling Slash a cancer. Now all the news is about 'Axl calls Slash a cancer' instead of anything about the new album or band. Kind of shooting himself in the foot, and with all the negitivity he spewed it's just makeing him look like the 'grumpy old recluse' the general public think of him.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: gonella on February 28, 2009, 07:28:51 AM
I really don't understand why Axl is beating so much in Slash. Slash stopped to speak bad thing about him in end of 90'.  It seens some kind of revenge..

Its too much easy Axl speak good things about the NEW members, saying that they have a good relationship. But It's so easy to understand the reason, the new members do not have a personality, they rarely express themseff in public, there is few interviews of them.. or talking about the chinese democracy, when they talked, they talked about abstract things of the album just to avoid conflict with Axl.

In this way eveybody is friendly. :)):):)  

 

Exactly! If the new GNR members are such an improvement, then why the fuck can't Axl confidently state who is, infact, in the band at this time????? What a fuckin joke!



The Axl' problem is accecpt the differences between the members. Someone should ask him about "how part you are responsible for the break?", because in his mind the problems are from the old members.

Del James if you are reading this enjoy it to ask. :):)




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on February 28, 2009, 07:43:45 AM
^ Ha! Slash wasn't so "tactfully and respectfully" when he said in 2006 how the new album only had a couple of vocals recorded - and he knew it by fact! Neither when he lies about not being at Axl's house bitching about VR people. Neither when he's always trying to be this "nice guy" but always spitting some venon here and there. So, when Axl is honest about his feelings (and not trying to be this "nice guy" saying nice things about something his dislikes), he's "throwing shit".

Wonder if you have to be always this fake and two faces asshole in the media for people to take you as a nice guy. Maybe that's why Axl is always getting shit for those so called fans... He's not trying to please you - unlike Slash. So sorry.

if you don't like guns n roses in its current form but like it in its past form, then you are a fan of what Guns N' Roses was.. not what it is.   Its pretty simple.   Its just calling it what it is.

What does it matter?  One can't be a fan unless they like GnR in it's current form?  Even Axl couldn't give an answer to what the current form is.  I'm not talking trash by saying that, I'm just saying that I'm tired of the sentiment around here that you can't be a fan unless you like the band for what it is now.  It doesn't matter.
Funny, because there is this section called Dead Horse and the one dedicated to the old band. Still, you're on the NEWS section, dedicated to talk about CURRENT stuff. How can someone who tends foward to the old guys insist to post the same shit here?

See, that's what Jim Bob was trying to say IMO. It's fine if you like the old guys (more), but don't expect to not having it back when people post here over and over how Axl is the bad guy and bla bla bla.

I'm not into what Slash is doing right now (or even in the VR). Do you see me spamming angry shit in a VR board?

I just don't subscribe to that , its not as like I didn't get past it, and succeeded, its the fact that when people decide NO you cant say that you should just bury it never speak.. fuck that, these things come in degrees, and the higher profile you are looked at in a public forum the harsher the critics are to say shut up. WHY?  Its a bit liberating to say the things you held inside , when you feel its right for you to do so. And I know me I take shit, stay silent move on, and sometimes I feel ok now is the time to speak up and squash whatever people thought before cause , the games are over ..and there is nothing wrong with doing so. Friendships end , partnerships end. and some go on the offense , very early , and in turn really destroy any shred of repair.
For sure, my friend. I have the same feeling. I knew a guy who wanted to stalk me and kille me (for real). I found out he commited suicide last year and friends in common were all "oh, he was a nice guy, we should respect this moment" and I said "FUCK THAT, he tried everything as possible to make my life a nightmare, he deserved it and I hope he's burning right now". And you know what? People got offended by my words.

I guess it's cool as long it's not with you. That's why I tottally respect any angry or bitterness Axl may have - nobody knows what he had to go through and still are blaming him for finally being able to talk about that without having to answer that old question "when the album is coming out?".

I really don't understand why Axl is beating so much in Slash. Slash stopped to speak bad thing about him in end of 90'.  It seens some kind of revenge..

Its too much easy Axl speak good things about the NEW members, saying that they have a good relationship. But It's so easy to understand the reason, the new members do not have a personality, they rarely express themseff in public, there is few interviews of them.. or talking about the chinese democracy, when they talked, they talked about abstract things of the album just to avoid conflict with Axl.

In this way eveybody is friendly. :)):):)  

 
You're so full of shit you don't even know what you're talking about. Is it "personality" to have a band, wish to get back to your old one and talking shit about everyone?

Obviously he wouldn't talk shit about the CURRENT members - if they are still in the loop, it's why they don't problems with him. Still, Axl didn't seem too happy about Robin's choices, did he?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: waxlrick on February 28, 2009, 07:45:24 AM
But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

That's true.

Doesn't that prove the fact that Axl doesn't play the same game everybody else does?

Which is what makes him so great.


On the other hand, those headlines should stop all the morons in the media writing headlines about a GN'R reunion based on quotes such as "never say never" (or whatever he said) from Duff etc.

So, you see, things aren't always that simple...

If you can get the reunion bullshit to disappear, then you can get down to the real thing and focus on just the present.


/jarmo


It's time for you and others to take off your blinkers!

Axl is a great and completely unique singer/song writer and performer. But please allow yourself and others to be objective. It may be possible that all the rumours are true and the Axl Rose may just be, a complete and utter nutbag!

Just clarify for us, what is the focus at present? Because I can't see any evidence of activity in the New GNR camp since the album was released? With the wrong insert booklet and one incorrect song version which, again, was somebody else's fault.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Irish gunner II on February 28, 2009, 07:49:28 AM
My problem with a few people on this and other message boards is that before Axl spook they respected Slash and in some cases idolised him. But not he is the son of satan and they never liked. That kind of behaviour annoys me both in the real world and on the INTERNET.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Classic Case on February 28, 2009, 07:53:12 AM
I give Del credit. he asked some good questions.

Credit for asking the same questions that some1 asked hundred times bfore?



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on February 28, 2009, 08:07:48 AM
But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

That's true.

Doesn't that prove the fact that Axl doesn't play the same game everybody else does?

Which is what makes him so great.


On the other hand, those headlines should stop all the morons in the media writing headlines about a GN'R reunion based on quotes such as "never say never" (or whatever he said) from Duff etc.

So, you see, things aren't always that simple...

If you can get the reunion bullshit to disappear, then you can get down to the real thing and focus on just the present.


/jarmo


It's time for you and others to take off your blinkers!

Axl is a great and completely unique singer/song writer and performer. But please allow yourself and others to be objective. It may be possible that all the rumours are true and the Axl Rose may just be, a complete and utter nutbag!

Just clarify for us, what is the focus at present? Because I can't see any evidence of activity in the New GNR camp since the album was released? With the wrong insert booklet and one incorrect song version which, again, was somebody else's fault.

whixh song was it that was the incorrect version???


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: waxlrick on February 28, 2009, 08:17:09 AM
But they still won't report on CD.  The headlines will be "Axl calls Slash a cancer."  

That's true.

Doesn't that prove the fact that Axl doesn't play the same game everybody else does?

Which is what makes him so great.


On the other hand, those headlines should stop all the morons in the media writing headlines about a GN'R reunion based on quotes such as "never say never" (or whatever he said) from Duff etc.

So, you see, things aren't always that simple...

If you can get the reunion bullshit to disappear, then you can get down to the real thing and focus on just the present.


/jarmo


It's time for you and others to take off your blinkers!

Axl is a great and completely unique singer/song writer and performer. But please allow yourself and others to be objective. It may be possible that all the rumours are true and the Axl Rose may just be, a complete and utter nutbag!

Just clarify for us, what is the focus at present? Because I can't see any evidence of activity in the New GNR camp since the album was released? With the wrong insert booklet and one incorrect song version which, again, was somebody else's fault.

whixh song was it that was the incorrect version???

You'll have to ask Axl that. I am pretty sure he mentioned this issue in either the Billboard interview or the post on the fan blog.  Without naming the exact track there. I couldn't be fucked searching for it myself but it was in the paragraph where he say's "business as usual" in regard to the music industry pressing CD's e.t.c


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: gonella on February 28, 2009, 08:26:05 AM
^ Ha! Slash wasn't so "tactfully and respectfully" when he said in 2006 how the new album only had a couple of vocals recorded - and he knew it by fact! Neither when he lies about not being at Axl's house bitching about VR people. Neither when he's always trying to be this "nice guy" but always spitting some venon here and there. So, when Axl is honest about his feelings (and not trying to be this "nice guy" saying nice things about something his dislikes), he's "throwing shit".

Wonder if you have to be always this fake and two faces asshole in the media for people to take you as a nice guy. Maybe that's why Axl is always getting shit for those so called fans... He's not trying to please you - unlike Slash. So sorry.

if you don't like guns n roses in its current form but like it in its past form, then you are a fan of what Guns N' Roses was.. not what it is.   Its pretty simple.   Its just calling it what it is.

What does it matter?  One can't be a fan unless they like GnR in it's current form?  Even Axl couldn't give an answer to what the current form is.  I'm not talking trash by saying that, I'm just saying that I'm tired of the sentiment around here that you can't be a fan unless you like the band for what it is now.  It doesn't matter.
Funny, because there is this section called Dead Horse and the one dedicated to the old band. Still, you're on the NEWS section, dedicated to talk about CURRENT stuff. How can someone who tends foward to the old guys insist to post the same shit here?

See, that's what Jim Bob was trying to say IMO. It's fine if you like the old guys (more), but don't expect to not having it back when people post here over and over how Axl is the bad guy and bla bla bla.

I'm not into what Slash is doing right now (or even in the VR). Do you see me spamming angry shit in a VR board?

I just don't subscribe to that , its not as like I didn't get past it, and succeeded, its the fact that when people decide NO you cant say that you should just bury it never speak.. fuck that, these things come in degrees, and the higher profile you are looked at in a public forum the harsher the critics are to say shut up. WHY?  Its a bit liberating to say the things you held inside , when you feel its right for you to do so. And I know me I take shit, stay silent move on, and sometimes I feel ok now is the time to speak up and squash whatever people thought before cause , the games are over ..and there is nothing wrong with doing so. Friendships end , partnerships end. and some go on the offense , very early , and in turn really destroy any shred of repair.
For sure, my friend. I have the same feeling. I knew a guy who wanted to stalk me and kille me (for real). I found out he commited suicide last year and friends in common were all "oh, he was a nice guy, we should respect this moment" and I said "FUCK THAT, he tried everything as possible to make my life a nightmare, he deserved it and I hope he's burning right now". And you know what? People got offended by my words.

I guess it's cool as long it's not with you. That's why I tottally respect any angry or bitterness Axl may have - nobody knows what he had to go through and still are blaming him for finally being able to talk about that without having to answer that old question "when the album is coming out?".

I really don't understand why Axl is beating so much in Slash. Slash stopped to speak bad thing about him in end of 90'.  It seens some kind of revenge..

Its too much easy Axl speak good things about the NEW members, saying that they have a good relationship. But It's so easy to understand the reason, the new members do not have a personality, they rarely express themseff in public, there is few interviews of them.. or talking about the chinese democracy, when they talked, they talked about abstract things of the album just to avoid conflict with Axl.

In this way eveybody is friendly. :)):):)  

 
You're so full of shit you don't even know what you're talking about. Is it "personality" to have a band, wish to get back to your old one and talking shit about everyone?

Obviously he wouldn't talk shit about the CURRENT members - if they are still in the loop, it's why they don't problems with him. Still, Axl didn't seem too happy about Robin's choices, did he?


Little Voodoo,


When I said  'personality', i did a comparation with the old band. The new members are more 'passive', i never saw they saying anything against  Axl' ideas. In another hand, the old band are always expressing the ideas, doing interview about new paths to follow. This kind of attitude shows strong 'personality' they know how to defend them ideas.  

See the difference, the new band are 'almost' more time in the street(1999 - 2008) as Guns N' Roses than old line(1985-1994).  And compare the number of interview of each other. And if you look the interview content is totally useless, abstract, nothing concrete about the chinese demoracry, sure there are good interviews explaing many things, but a few of them. I think who did a lot of contribuition was Bumblefoot when he entered, but it was a modern time(2006 - 2009)(replying email from fans).

So looking for the Axl' Side is more easier to 'handle' the new guys.

Accept the truth :)



 




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on February 28, 2009, 08:36:40 AM
You know, you don't have to use bold in every single word. And you're still full of it, accept the truth. ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: gonella on February 28, 2009, 08:42:15 AM
You know, you don't have to use bold in every single word. And you're still full of it, accept the truth. ;)

I thought that you was myopic, for the reason I used a lot of bold.. :):):) :hihi:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 28, 2009, 09:19:55 AM
I just find it hard to believe that every single person in the world is lying. Jesus, Even Bucket left, Robin has left twice......


No but slash lies.
Robin and bucket don't like the label very much and they don't say much.

That's perhaps the most redundant post I've seen. Talk about living up to the stereotypes D was talking about.

Anyway, I think MeanBone has said it best. Very insightful.

what part of the meanbone post are you agreeing to?

you must be able to answer my question instead of d. point out where axl lied.

Plus axl isn't saying the entire world is against him and it's not.
Maybe Slash and his supporters which I understand you are one of, are, but don't exaggerate, they aren't the entire world.

Read carefully Axl isn't even saying he was faultless at that time.

The break up was unavoidable and not necessarily a bad thing. An Ending is a beginning.

I said this before and I'll say it again thank you Slash for leaving the band. : : ok:

But somewhat people who obviously weren't there still blame it and solely on axl, when in your and your friends theory everyone involved was responsible, right?
Who is their source?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: maynard on February 28, 2009, 10:15:14 AM
I love the "passive agressive" attitude from Robin. He just said "Fuck it" and went touring and having fun with NIN.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: King Axl on February 28, 2009, 10:26:14 AM
It's a good article, though I feel Axl would be better served interviewing with Rolling Stone or Entertainment Weekly. That way, he can reach the largest potential audience and not have to answer the same questions in every interview with the smaller media publications.

100% in agreement about Slash. There's no question he's done nothing good since the Illusion albums, and Axl managed to get the very best out of him for those recordings.

While fifteen years was an obviously long time, in the end it's better to have put out something very good like Chinese Democracy, instead of putting out garbage every two to three years as Slash has since 1993.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on February 28, 2009, 10:37:20 AM
I love the "passive agressive" attitude from Robin. He just said "Fuck it" and went touring and having fun with NIN.

riiiiiiiiiiiight


I love that he pushed axl to put TIL on the record


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 28, 2009, 11:03:24 AM
I love the "passive agressive" attitude from Robin. He just said "Fuck it" and went touring and having fun with NIN.

riiiiiiiiiiiight


I love that he pushed axl to put TIL on the record

snap. and his stevie ray vaughn kind solo axl advertises.

I love as how axl's cool about Robin, bh josh and everyone except liars and slashers :hihi:




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: TomFriend on February 28, 2009, 11:29:56 AM
Trying to promote the new album by slagging off (rightfully or otherwise) the old band seems like a strange tactic.

It's a shame more time can't be spent establishing and discussing the new band than trying to bury the old. All this is going to do is stir up the same old Axl Vs. Slash bullshit and take the focus further off C.D.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SlashRock on February 28, 2009, 11:47:27 AM
Trying to promote the new album by slagging off (rightfully or otherwise) the old band seems like a strange tactic.

It's a shame more time can't be spent establishing and discussing the new band than trying to bury the old. All this is going to do is stir up the same old Axl Vs. Slash bullshit and take the focus further off C.D.

And you don't think that's the whole point behind this?

If he was serious about promoting the record he would be keeping the music in the public eye. The lack of a music video for 'Better' pretty much says it all.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 11:54:25 AM
I just find it a bit funny that Slash has moved on in the press, answers questions about Axl tactfully and respectfully, and now Axl appears in the press again throwing shit.

He wrote a fucking book that was mostly about GN'R and was supposed to "set the record straight".

 ::)



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: falungong69 on February 28, 2009, 11:58:34 AM
slash wrote nothing but lies and slander about axl in his stupid book.  he went out of his way to make axl look bad, and now he's getting his just desserts.  fuck slash.  fuck him in his lying, black heart.  he is nothing, and the only people who support him any more are only doing so to try and tear down axl and the amazing new music he's made.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SlashRock on February 28, 2009, 12:01:48 PM
slash wrote nothing but lies and slander about axl in his stupid book.  he went out of his way to make axl look bad, and now he's getting his just desserts.  fuck slash.  fuck him in his lying, black heart.  he is nothing, and the only people who support him any more are only doing so to try and tear down axl and the amazing new music he's made.

OTT much?

Amazingly people can support both Axl and Slash!  :o


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: falungong69 on February 28, 2009, 12:11:38 PM
i for one don't support cancer.  it's eye-openning to see that you do.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: SlashRock on February 28, 2009, 12:14:00 PM
i for one don't support cancer.  it's eye-openning to see that you do.

To compare a human being to cancer is disgusting in my opinion. You are obviously very ignorant on the tragedy that cancer brings to peoples lives.

Idiot.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:18:03 PM
Idiot.

-1

Read our rules.


/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:23:21 PM
I love the "passive agressive" attitude from Robin. He just said "Fuck it" and went touring and having fun with NIN.

riiiiiiiiiiiight


I love that he pushed axl to put TIL on the record

snap. and his stevie ray vaughn kind solo axl advertises.

I love as how axl's cool about Robin, bh josh and everyone except liars and slashers :hihi:




See, I find this hilarious right here.

Axl talking about Detractors and media and fans Building up HYPE. Here he is promising a SRV type solo from Robin.

I have heard Robin do live solos and on CD and I don't see how he possibly could pull something like that off. People have heard the great SRV play right? So when we do hear this solo and if it doesn't quite meet expectation, I guess it will be our faults again for hyping it up.


Jim Bob did make a good point earlier about being a fan of GNR in 2009. Problem with that is, People on this message forum think u have to worship 2009 GNR and think they are better than old GNR to be a fan.

I am a fan of CD and 2009 GNR but I am a bigger fan of the AFD/UYI lineup. So based on me liking the old band better, I am labeled as not a fan which is just ridiculous.

Its hard to be a die hard fan of a band that changes its lineup more than Garry changes usernames.

I think GNR are more of a NIN type band where its Axl and whoever is available to tour. How many bands do u know that aren't able to do anything even if they wanted due to most of the members having other commitments?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 12:27:59 PM
Here he is promising a SRV type solo from Robin.

I have heard Robin do live solos and on CD and I don't see how he possibly could pull something like that off. People have heard the great SRV play right? So when we do hear this solo and if it doesn't quite meet expectation, I guess it will be our faults again for hyping it up.


And that's the problem.

You're already saying he can't.

You're the one who's bashed the musicianship on CD.

No wonder they'll never be good enough.



How many bands do u know that aren't able to do anything even if they wanted due to most of the members having other commitments?

Please explain. Who are these "most of the members" with other commitments that are stopping GN'R?



Quote
Who's in the band?

I think we'll go with a combo of who's around and who's on the album for now and worry about that when we get ready to tour.


Which is how it's been since they played their first show in Las Vegas in 2000.

Some of the people who are on the album won't be available for touring. Obviously they can't bring everybody who's on the album on tour either.



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 28, 2009, 12:37:52 PM
slash wrote nothing but lies and slander about axl in his stupid book.  he went out of his way to make axl look bad, and now he's getting his just desserts.  fuck slash.  fuck him in his lying, black heart.  he is nothing, and the only people who support him any more are only doing so to try and tear down axl and the amazing new music he's made.

Dude, he's only half black. And that's not very nice


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Silverchair on February 28, 2009, 12:50:16 PM
this isn't the best interview... but it isn't that bad. Axl put up with like 10 years of people talking shit about him... give the guy 10 fucking minutes.

people won't be happy until Axl says "it was all my fault... i miss slash, i love him like a brother... i wish i wasn't so stupid... i can't write without Slash/Izzy... I am a failure. I apologize to everyone... I am a piece of shit, I need the old guns".

It pisses me off that no matter what Axl says... he's always seen as the asshole. ALWAYS. He can never do anything right.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 12:50:17 PM
Jarmo
Stevie Ray Vaughn is one of probably the 4 or 5 greatest blues guitarist who ever lived.

Putting that kind of pressure on a solo is gonna make it damn near impossible once again to live up to, just like how he talked about having "Big Guns"  and how these songs are only demos but yet the final versions weren't very different.

Could Axl play a gig tomorrow if he wanted to? NO he couldn't and that is the point cause since this band started every member has had so many side bands, I can't keep track.

Richard is out with Rihanna, Robin has been gone with NIN, Tommy has been doing the Soul Asylum thing.

you had 2 members, correct me if I am wrong releasing or working on solo albums while this album is released.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 28, 2009, 12:51:11 PM
slash wrote nothing but lies and slander about axl in his stupid book.  he went out of his way to make axl look bad, and now he's getting his just desserts.  fuck slash.  fuck him in his lying, black heart.  he is nothing, and the only people who support him any more are only doing so to try and tear down axl and the amazing new music he's made.

Dude, he's only half black. And that's not very nice
I don't think he meant that as a racial slap.

Though he is either super high or needs to get out more (isn't this the guy who wanted to abandon his friends for not liking n-gnr?)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on February 28, 2009, 12:53:34 PM
this isn't the best interview... but it isn't that bad. Axl put up with like 10 years of people talking shit about him... give the guy 10 fucking minutes.

people won't be happy until Axl says "it was all my fault... i miss slash, i love him like a brother... i wish i wasn't so stupid... i can't write without Slash/Izzy... I am a failure. I apologize to everyone... I am a piece of shit, I need the old guns".

It pisses me off that no matter what Axl says... he's always seen as the asshole. ALWAYS. He can never do anything right.


/u can easily replace Axl's name with other former members and that is the way some see.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 12:55:15 PM
The truth is somewhere in the middle people. If you believe otherwise you are a fool.


This thread(and the one on my gnr 67+pgs) demonstrates why its in Axls best interest not to talk about the old band....assuming of course  he wants to move on.....



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: makane on February 28, 2009, 01:01:48 PM
The truth is somewhere in the middle people. If you believe otherwise you are a fool.


Yeap.

Unfortunately some people have some underlying personal bias (ie. backstage passes) or some sort of need for approval.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:02:45 PM
I have no problems with Axl sharing his side of the story

The problem is, he doesn't come off very articulate and it just doesn't help him.

If he would simply give his side of the breakup, calmly, reserved like he was talking on Eddie Trunk minus the bashes and insults and the slagging off on some of the greatest rock material ever recorded, people would be more open to accepting it.
Some minor bashing on Slash is fine. Calling him a drug addict, a liar etc. Fine, that is cool but when you start insulting a man's talent, that is just crossing the line. No matter what Slash ever said about Axl, he never tried to deny his talent and how amazing he is. Axl comes off like anyone could've been the guitarist for Guns and it wouldn't have mattered and that simply is not true.

He has a right to his opinion but I am here to tell you, Contraband IS a kick ass fucking rock N Roll record and the accolades it received backs that up. It is still one of my fave albums ever and I think the guitar playing kicks ass on it.


I guess the reason people believe Slash is cause there have been various other people with similar stories throughout the years. now is that a conspiracy?  Is everybody lying and only Axl telling the truth?  It also helps when you admit certain faults that you did have which he doesn't do except for saying he takes responsibility for not making UYI better. 

All I know is, Duff, Matt, Steven and Izzy all had no problems playing and collaborating with Slash whereas they all no longer wanted to work with Axl.  Now that is a perception that can't be explained by saying Slash is a liar.  There has to be something to that.

does that mean the breakup was ALL his fault. Absolutely not. I have said from day one I think everyone had an equal share in a lot of it. Problem is, everyone else has admitted to their faults except Axl.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 01:07:21 PM
Quote
I have no problems with Axl sharing his side of the story

The problem is, he doesn't come off very articulate and it just doesn't help him.

If he would simply give his side of the breakup, calmly, reserved like he was talking on Eddie Trunk minus the bashes and insults and the slagging off on some of the greatest rock material ever recorded, people would be more open to accepting it.
Some minor bashing on Slash is fine. Calling him a drug addict, a liar etc. Fine, that is cool but when you start insulting a man's talent, that is just crossing the line. No matter what Slash ever said about Axl, he never tried to deny his talent and how amazing he is. Axl comes off like anyone could've been the guitarist for Guns and it wouldn't have mattered and that simply is not true.

He has a right to his opinion but I am here to tell you, Contraband IS a kick ass fucking rock N Roll record and the accolades it received backs that up. It is still one of my fave albums ever and I think the guitar playing kicks ass on it.


I guess the reason people believe Slash is cause there have been various other people with similar stories throughout the years. now is that a conspiracy?  Is everybody lying and only Axl telling the truth?  It also helps when you admit certain faults that you did have which he doesn't do except for saying he takes responsibility for not making UYI better. 

All I know is, Duff, Matt, Steven and Izzy all had no problems playing and collaborating with Slash whereas they all no longer wanted to work with Axl.  Now that is a perception that can't be explained by saying Slash is a liar.  There has to be something to that.

does that mean the breakup was ALL his fault. Absolutely not. I have said from day one I think everyone had an equal share in a lot of it. Problem is, everyone else has admitted to their faults except Axl.

excellent post...


Like I said yesterday....you have throw Axls circle of "friends" into the mix as well...what kind of advice is Axl getting over the past few years? A guy like Del should step up and start giving Axl some concrete advice. This isnt fukin rocket science.

Btw can we have Axl 2000-2006 back?
During that time Axl hinted about how he felt about the old band. Bt he never really dissed their talents and he certainly never attempted to divide the fan base. His message at that time was more along the lines of the past  is the past, lets move on. Ive been saying this for a few yrs now....when Axl came back in 06 he changed...just my observation


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:14:02 PM
Another thing, About the guitar and the Hard Rock

Slash is a guitar player, And I know most guitar players, TAKE their guitars with them on road trips cause hotel rooms get lonely and boring and when you get in your hotel room, u play around on your guitar.

So maybe they saw Slash with a guitar case headed up to his hotel room and for whatever reasons they got freaked out when he probably takes a guitar EVERYWHERE he goes.

what was the guy going to do? run past security with a guitar, jump on stage and start acoustically jamming on his electric?

Please


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 01:18:10 PM
Jarmo
Stevie Ray Vaughn is one of probably the 4 or 5 greatest blues guitarist who ever lived.

Putting that kind of pressure on a solo is gonna make it damn near impossible once again to live up to, just like how he talked about having "Big Guns"  and how these songs are only demos but yet the final versions weren't very different.

Seriously.

You're just using the quote to put the band down.

"Robin does a really great Stevie Ray Vaughan-type solo "

Does it say it's as great as SRV?

It says type!




Could Axl play a gig tomorrow if he wanted to? NO he couldn't and that is the point cause since this band started every member has had so many side bands, I can't keep track.

Richard is out with Rihanna, Robin has been gone with NIN, Tommy has been doing the Soul Asylum thing.


How do you know he couldn't?

First off, you're info is dated. You keep repeating it like it's always the case.

Like GN'R is just Richard's side project.

To quote Depeche Mode "Wrong!".

In case you've been in complete isolation lately, Rihanna isn't touring. She's got other things to deal with.


Stop repeating this bullshit that everybody in GN'R is busy elsewhere.

The only one who is scheduled to play with another band through the summer is Robin. That situation has been addressed by Axl already.


Btw can we have Axl 2000-2006 back?

Can we have Younggunner 2001 back?


As soon as I point out the stupidity in your posts, you get defensive and start telling me to make up my mind and stop with the word games.

Well, haven't you noticed that people change?

Axl in 2006 wasn't necessarily the same person he was six years earlier.

Neither were you. Or I.

You want the old Axl back? Well, too bad Slash decided to put out a book in... Let's see.. 2007! Can you build a time machine and make sure it's never published?



By the way, if you want to compare, the 2006 Axl seemed to have a lot more fun than the 2002 Axl. Sorry.....



During that time Axl hinted about how he felt about the old band. Bt he never really dissed their talents and he certainly never attempted to divide the fan base. His message at that time was more along the lines of the past  is the past, lets move on.

Yeah, selective memory.

Remember when he told a crowd about how hard he had to work to get those guys to record certain songs?

Remember when he said Slash was in his ass?




Some minor bashing on Slash is fine. Calling him a drug addict, a liar etc. Fine, that is cool but when you start insulting a man's talent, that is just crossing the line. No matter what Slash ever said about Axl, he never tried to deny his talent and how amazing he is. Axl comes off like anyone could've been the guitarist for Guns and it wouldn't have mattered and that simply is not true.

He has a right to his opinion but I am here to tell you, Contraband IS a kick ass fucking rock N Roll record and the accolades it received backs that up. It is still one of my fave albums ever and I think the guitar playing kicks ass on it.


Funny how even Slash seems to think the guitar playing on that album is lacking....




D, nice of you to try to make this into a VR fan thread. What the fuck does Contraband have to do with anything?

GN'R never won a Grammy. I guess it means Appetite For Destruction can't be as great as Contraband!

 ::)


All this time you try to fool us into thinking you're a GN'R fan.

You're a fan of the old band, I get that. But to try to act like you're a fan of the current band, please.

It seems like you're a VR fan who enjoys some new GN'R songs.



Another thing, About the guitar and the Hard Rock

Nice.



Slash showing up with a guitar is like an ambush.

"He just wanted to play and Axl said no!" Who does that make seem like the asshole?

That's right, the same guy you're attacking: Axl!




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:22:19 PM
No, It isn't comparing CB to Appetite, but it just proves that he isn't some dude living off his past, wasting away his talents and not doing anything. You don't have that success by mailing it in and living off past glories.


I am a huge VR fan, that doesn't get in the way of how much I like Chinese Democracy cause I view them as separate albums. I don't feel I have to love one more than the other to be a fan of either.

I'd like some more info on that.

Did Slash have a guitar going into a hotel? Or did he have it around his neck at the door trying to get into the club?

Cause one thing signals another.

If he had it trying to get into the show. Yeah, that is fucked up

If people saw him with a guitar case in a hotel lobby, that is just being paranoid.

Rihanna's tour is ON HOLD. Once she recovers, she will be back out and guess who will be playing guitar?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 01:27:02 PM
No, It isn't comparing CB to Appetite, but it just proves that he isn't some dude living off his past, wasting away his talents and not doing anything. You don't have that success by mailing it in and living off past glories.


Well you managed to mention all the accolades that album got. A Grammy Award is one I think?

Just saying, GN'R didn't win one. It's not a seal of quality...




I am a huge VR fan, that doesn't get in the way of how much I like Chinese Democracy cause I view them as separate albums. I don't feel I have to love one more than the other to be a fan of either.

I'd like some more info on that.


Info on trying to act like a huge GN'R supporter when a lot of people see through you?


Did Slash have a guitar going into a hotel? Or did he have it around his neck at the door trying to get into the club?

Cause one thing signals another.

If he had it trying to get into the show. Yeah, that is fucked up

If people saw him with a guitar case in a hotel lobby, that is just being paranoid.


Paranoid or not, you didn't address what I said.

Answer this: Slash shows up in Las Vegas with a guitar when GN'R are about to play their first show without him, he gets denied to enter the premises. Who does it make seem like the evil asshole?




Rihanna's tour is ON HOLD. Once she recovers, she will be back out and guess who will be playing guitar?

Please tell me.

Since Richard only had the February dates on his web site.



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 01:30:24 PM
Quote
Remember when he told a crowd about how hard he had to work to get those guys to record certain songs?

Remember when he said Slash was in his ass?
nothing wrong with that comment at all.

Quote
Well, haven't you noticed that people change?
unfortunately if this is the theme that we are going to get in every interview then hes changed for the worse



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 01:33:20 PM
unfortunately if this is the theme that we are going to get in every interview then hes changed for the worse

Well if that's your opinion, I think you haven't paid attention.

Axl has always spoken his mind.

There's even a few lines about it on an album that was released in 1991.  : ok:




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 28, 2009, 01:35:49 PM
slash wrote nothing but lies and slander about axl in his stupid book.  he went out of his way to make axl look bad, and now he's getting his just desserts.  fuck slash.  fuck him in his lying, black heart.  he is nothing, and the only people who support him any more are only doing so to try and tear down axl and the amazing new music he's made.

Dude, he's only half black. And that's not very nice
I don't think he meant that as a racial slap.

Though he is either super high or needs to get out more (isn't this the guy who wanted to abandon his friends for not liking n-gnr?)

Yeah, I was joking. And I'm continually amazed at how pissed off people get over this.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 01:40:52 PM
Axl is generating the wrong headlines. All the focus is on old gnr and Axl and not the album and the new band.

Maybe that is his strategy but if he wants people to focus on the new era than hes doing a horrific job....and thats where his friends need to step up


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:41:58 PM
There you go again Jarmo. Acting like the official Fan Club spokesman for GNR and like it is your God Given right to proclaim who is a fan and who isn't.

I am an Axl Rose fan. The guys in his band? I don't know them well enough yet to say that I am a hardcore fan. Just look at you guys on the site. A guy comes in, u guys act like they are the greatest whatever. They leave, new guy comes in, it turns into fuck the old guy and this new guy is the greatest thing ever.


I don't work that way. I build admiration for artists over time and by learning about them and their personalities as well as their music and how i relate to them. Seeing as we haven't been exposed alot to the newer members, I haven't developed that kind of bond with any of them.  I think Ron is a very talented, very awesome guy and the more time goes by and the more band stuff GNR do, I feel I could get into him, I like Tommy, I have always said pittman would be the MVP of the new members.

Buckethead was awesome.

I don't have much for Robin or Richard only because I don't like Robin's style and Richard just hasn't done enough to make me turn into a fan yet. he has some decent stage presence but that alone doesn't make me a die hard fan.


I just love the attitude that because I love VR and Slash and Duff etc etc, I can't also love CD and Axl.

I don't agree with everything my favorite band or artist does, doesn't make me less of a fan because I have my own opinions about things.





Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 01:48:00 PM
There you go again Jarmo. Acting like the official Fan Club spokesman for GNR and like it is your God Given right to proclaim who is a fan and who isn't.


That's right, try to insult me when you got nothing better to say.

It's my opinion. Get it?


Just like it's your twisted opinion that SRV-type means it's gonna sound as great as SRV himself would've played it.

And Robin could not do that since he's not Slash (your idol).




I don't have much for Robin or Richard only because I don't like Robin's style and Richard just hasn't done enough to make me turn into a fan yet. he has some decent stage presence but that alone doesn't make me a die hard fan.


And yet you act like you can judge Robin's still unreleased solos already by twisting Axl's words around...





I just love the attitude that because I love VR and Slash and Duff etc etc, I can't also love CD and Axl.

No, that's not the attitude.

It comes from reading what you say. And what you don't say.

You don't want to spend any time on trying to understand Axl, while you have a great deal of understanding for Slash.



By the way, still waiting for the answers to my questions.





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 01:50:03 PM
I am an Axl Rose fan. The guys in his band? I don't know them well enough yet to say that I am a hardcore fan. Just look at you guys on the site. A guy comes in, u guys act like they are the greatest whatever. They leave, new guy comes in, it turns into fuck the old guy and this new guy is the greatest thing ever.
no, its new guys come in and we accept and embrace them as fans.   people like you would rather be a detractor because they are replacing your precious $lash.

Robin is my favorite guitar player to ever be in GnR.. that will not change even if he never plays on stage with GnR again.     And if he doesnt' come back, you aren't going to see me trashing his replacement because I happen to prefer Robin.  And I will have an open mind and go see them.   When did you go see the band D?


I just love the attitude that because I love VR and Slash and Duff etc etc, I can't also love CD and Axl.


you can like whatever you like, but when you start bashing the guys in the band now and constantly bringing up ways to mention slash/vr in this section you come across like a troll.    This is about current GnR in the year 2009.. not that fucking top hatted asshole.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:54:13 PM
What questions? The guitar thing?

Slash shows up at a hotel with a guitar case, a guy Axl later bashes is one of the witnesses?

I don't get it

Did Slash come TO the venue with a guitar? If so, that was stupid and wrong of Slash and he is the dick for doing that.


If he just had a guitar case in a hotel lobby in Vegas and people got paranoid and freaked out, that is just paranoia.

How did I insult u by saying u trying to say who can and who can't be a GNR fan?

I don't have to prove my fandom of any band to anybody. I know how I feel about things.

If being a fan means I have to believe 100 percent of what Axl says, then I guess I am not a fan.

When he talks shit about Slash supporters without realizing that 95 percent of GNR fans still support and love Slash, that is just a bad statement to make and it only  makes him look worse in the public eye.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 01:57:46 PM
I am an Axl Rose fan. The guys in his band? I don't know them well enough yet to say that I am a hardcore fan. Just look at you guys on the site. A guy comes in, u guys act like they are the greatest whatever. They leave, new guy comes in, it turns into fuck the old guy and this new guy is the greatest thing ever.
no, its new guys come in and we accept and embrace them as fans.   people like you would rather be a detractor because they are replacing your precious $lash.

Robin is my favorite guitar player to ever be in GnR.. that will not change even if he never plays on stage with GnR again.     And if he doesnt' come back, you aren't going to see me trashing his replacement because I happen to prefer Robin.  And I will have an open mind and go see them.   When did you go see the band D?


I just love the attitude that because I love VR and Slash and Duff etc etc, I can't also love CD and Axl.


you can like whatever you like, but when you start bashing the guys in the band now and constantly bringing up ways to mention slash/vr in this section you come across like a troll.    This is about current GnR in the year 2009.. not that fucking top hatted asshole.

Says the king troll of the VR section.

Axl blamed EVERYBODY for having high expectations for CD. Blamed everyone else, blamed Baz for the 4 album comment when he himself made it WAYYYYY before Baz

now he comes on and makes a comment comparing a Robin Finck solo to Stevie Ray Vaughn. I am just saying, if that solo DOESN'T live up to that sort of hype, he only has himself to blame for making that statement.

It isn't bashing Robin it is being honest. To compare a guy's playing to SRV is setting the bar amazingly high and from what I have heard of Robin, I don't think he is anywhere near a SRV level.

That isn't necessarily a slight because there are very few people to ever pick up a guitar on that level.

So when that song hits, if the solo isn't great, it will be the fan's fault for having great expectations.  that is my point.


Yeah, its my fault that GNR canceled their Nashville show that I was going to go to

It is my fault they didn't play in Atlanta.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 01:59:23 PM
I'm sorry, is this a VR site?  Am I supposd to be a VR fan to be a member here?    Am I supposed to support GnR if I'm a member here?   There it is.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 02:00:39 PM
I'm sorry, is this a VR site?  Am I supposd to be a VR fan to be a member here?    Am I supposed to support GnR if I'm a member here?   There it is.

Considering u have more posts in VR than almost anywhere else............. just saying


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 28, 2009, 02:03:05 PM

When he talks shit about Slash supporters without realizing that 95 percent of GNR fans still support and love Slash, that is just a bad statement to make and it only  makes him look worse in the public eye.



I'll agree with this statement 100%.  I was a bit disappointed with how much time was devoted to Slash in this last interview. I think calling someone who was such a big part of your band's legacy a "cancer" is a bit of a slap in the face to your fanbase.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 02:06:22 PM
What questions? The guitar thing?

For example.

So you don't understand how it would make Axl seem like the asshole for refusing Slash onstage?

Poor guy just wanted to jam and evil Axl denied his request.

Who's made the victim and who's the villain?

Why can't you understand that?



How did I insult u by saying u trying to say who can and who can't be a GNR fan?

You didn't, you tried.

By making up some kind of mocking titles when all I'm doing is telling you my own opinion.





I don't have to prove my fandom of any band to anybody. I know how I feel about things.

I know how you feel about things too.

That's the problem.


When he talks shit about Slash supporters without realizing that 95 percent of GNR fans still support and love Slash, that is just a bad statement to make and it only  makes him look worse in the public eye.


And that number, which I don't know where you got, might not be what it is if it wasn't for all the bullshit.

Another reason, which you don't get, that might explain Axl's feelings.


He's been judged by people who believed all the bullshit.




Could you get back to me on the source you have on Rihanna's upcoming tour and Richard's involvement in it? Thanks.

You seem certain that Richard is dedicated to touring with her for a long period of time. Just curious on your source on that because I'm convinced Richard only tours with other acts when it doesn't collide with GN'R activity.


Axl blamed EVERYBODY for having high expectations for CD. Blamed everyone else, blamed Baz for the 4 album comment when he himself made it WAYYYYY before Baz

Again? Didn't we go through this already?

Why do you keep ignoring everything that's posted and keep repeating your lines?


Baz said they have four albums worth of material. Axl made comment that they don't have that much finished.

Axl saying in 2002 that they're gonna release an album, follow it up with another one and then hopefully a third one doesn't really mean that they have three albums done and ready for release!


You just like to take what Axl said and twist it around so you can point out how wrong he is.


now he comes on and makes a comment comparing a Robin Finck solo to Stevie Ray Vaughn. I am just saying, if that solo DOESN'T live up to that sort of hype, he only has himself to blame for making that statement.

Again!

Didn't I explain to you what "type" could mean?

What is it with you?

Why do you keep ignoring things?

You don't want to read my posts? Stop posting then.




If I say you use "Prince type" spelling doesn't mean I think you're Prince!




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 28, 2009, 02:13:44 PM
Quote
It isn't bashing Robin it is being honest.

and when axl is honest he's bashing slash?

Is hard rock a hotel?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 02:14:14 PM
I'm sorry, is this a VR site?  Am I supposd to be a VR fan to be a member here?    Am I supposed to support GnR if I'm a member here?   There it is.

Considering u have more posts in VR than almost anywhere else............. just saying

no i don't (http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?action=profile;u=5506;sa=statPanel)

stop making stupid shit up.  

even if i did, this isn't a VR site.   VR have their own forums and I don't go to those trying to talk about GnR in every VR related thread.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: axl2 on February 28, 2009, 02:14:31 PM
I am an Axl Rose fan. The guys in his band? I don't know them well enough yet to say that I am a hardcore fan. Just look at you guys on the site. A guy comes in, u guys act like they are the greatest whatever. They leave, new guy comes in, it turns into fuck the old guy and this new guy is the greatest thing ever.
no, its new guys come in and we accept and embrace them as fans.   people like you would rather be a detractor because they are replacing your precious $lash.

Robin is my favorite guitar player to ever be in GnR.. that will not change even if he never plays on stage with GnR again.     And if he doesnt' come back, you aren't going to see me trashing his replacement because I happen to prefer Robin.  And I will have an open mind and go see them.   When did you go see the band D?


I just love the attitude that because I love VR and Slash and Duff etc etc, I can't also love CD and Axl.


you can like whatever you like, but when you start bashing the guys in the band now and constantly bringing up ways to mention slash/vr in this section you come across like a troll.    This is about current GnR in the year 2009.. not that fucking top hatted asshole.

Says the king troll of the VR section.

Axl blamed EVERYBODY for having high expectations for CD. Blamed everyone else, blamed Baz for the 4 album comment when he himself made it WAYYYYY before Baz

now he comes on and makes a comment comparing a Robin Finck solo to Stevie Ray Vaughn. I am just saying, if that solo DOESN'T live up to that sort of hype, he only has himself to blame for making that statement.

It isn't bashing Robin it is being honest. To compare a guy's playing to SRV is setting the bar amazingly high and from what I have heard of Robin, I don't think he is anywhere near a SRV level.

That isn't necessarily a slight because there are very few people to ever pick up a guitar on that level.

So when that song hits, if the solo isn't great, it will be the fan's fault for having great expectations.  that is my point.


Yeah, its my fault that GNR canceled their Nashville show that I was going to go to

It is my fault they didn't play in Atlanta.



I agree with everything you are saying. Expect the Finck future solo. Axl is saying it's in a Stevie Ray Vaughn style. Hell one of us could do a solo of any style, shouldn't be compared because Stevie Ray Vaughn stold his style from Robert Johnson and Jimmy Hendrix and they stole there's from elsewheres.

But as far as everything else you are saying. Yes Axl was wrong for dissing on Slash this way. I mean he hasn't talked to Slash since what 1996? I'm sure Slash is a different character. If anything it seems like Slash grew up the last few years and hasn't taken the time to take shots at Axl like the past. Only thing is, Axl is taking the opportunity of doing it X10. It's really childish.

Make your opinion, fine, and use your side of the story but there is NO reason to run the other side down and discredit him and disrespect him musically. As a musician spitting on other peoples skills is a HUGE no no.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 02:14:38 PM
so a SRV type solo means what then? When I hear someone say "Such and Such song has a Hendrix like solo" U know what, My expectations are going to be pretty fucking huge. That is my point. Axl is building huge expectations for this now and I just hope it can live up to that, cause if we hear it and people are disappointed by it, it won't be our fault for building it up.


Your whole guitar argument though is based on a hypothetical situation

Slash didn't come into the venue with a guitar, Axl didn't refuse to let him play, so I don't understand what the point of that is?

Did Slash have a guitar trying to get into the venue? Or did he just have a guitar in a hotel lobby he was staying at?

U make it sound like Slash flew to Vegas for the sole purpose of ruining the concert when he was already there on other business.


If Richard isn't committed to the rest of RIhanna's tour, then Ok, i was wrong about that. Is Robin committed to the next NIN tour?

I just found it interesting that Axl really couldn't even answer questions about his own band. 2 drummers?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 02:16:42 PM
I'm sorry, is this a VR site?  Am I supposd to be a VR fan to be a member here?    Am I supposed to support GnR if I'm a member here?   There it is.

Considering u have more posts in VR than almost anywhere else............. just saying

no i don't (http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?action=profile;u=5506;sa=statPanel)

stop making stupid shit up.  

even if i did, this isn't a VR site.   VR have their own forums and I don't go to those trying to talk about GnR in every VR related thread.


Jim Bob, I am honestly not trying to fight with you, but let me say it like this. I hate Van Halen and I hate U2 ok.

In Bad Obsession, i think i have maybe a post or two in each section

U have over 750 posts in the VR section

Im just sayin, I sure as hell wouldn't post 750 times about a band i fucking hate.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on February 28, 2009, 02:19:24 PM


I just found it interesting that Axl really couldn't even answer questions about his own band. 2 drummers?

Theres been 2 drummers since summer 2006.   It could be either Frank or Brain.    Brain obviously has senority and played on a lot more of the album so if he wants to be a part of the band on the road, he will probably have that option.  



U have over 750 posts in the VR section

Im just sayin, I sure as hell wouldn't post 750 times about a band i fucking hate.

I don't hate them.   Not a fan really, but hate is a strong word.    What can I say?   Its a VR section on a GnR board and sometimes its best to argue with VR fans in their own section cuz I don't want to read about $lash when I read GnR threads.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on February 28, 2009, 02:20:07 PM
Jim Bob, I am honestly not trying to fight with you, but let me say it like this. I hate Van Halen and I hate U2 ok.

In Bad Obsession, i think i have maybe a post or two in each section

U have over 750 posts in the VR section

Im just sayin, I sure as hell wouldn't post 750 times about a band i fucking hate.

Yeah, but what if Eddie or Bono had come to your house, shit on the floor, and killed your dog like Slash apparently did to some of these people?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 02:23:34 PM
Quote
It isn't bashing Robin it is being honest.

and when axl is honest he's bashing slash?


Yeah, funny how that works.

People saying how much they dislike Robin's playing is just "their honest opinion" when Axl speaks out, he should shut up.

Hypocrites.


so a SRV type solo means what then? When I hear someone say "Such and Such song has a Hendrix like solo" U know what, My expectations are going to be pretty fucking huge. That is my point. Axl is building huge expectations for this now and I just hope it can live up to that, cause if we hear it and people are disappointed by it, it won't be our fault for building it up.


Well for me it could mean many things, anything from the emotion of the solo, the tone, the style, the technical aspect etc etc.

You just want to have another reason to be able to bash Robin and Axl.

"He said it was gonna be the greatest!"

We both know, you don't need Axl's help to bash Robin.

You don't like him. Period.

So instead of saying "I don't like this solo because I hate Robin", you want to say "Axl said it was gonna be SRV great and it's not, Axl hyped it up too much!".


Your whole guitar argument though is based on a hypothetical situation

And yours isn't?

Answer the question.

Who gets the bad press when your former guitar player shows up in the same venue where the gig is with a guitar and is denied entrance?

If you can answer that question, maybe you can understand the reasons behind the so called paranoia.

So far you've managed not to answer it.




If Richard isn't committed to the rest of RIhanna's tour, then Ok, i was wrong about that. Is Robin committed to the next NIN tour?

You said he was!

And now you're saying you're not so sure.

So in other words, you're guessing and basing your "honest opinion" on nothing more than guesses.  : ok:


NIN is gonna tour with Jane's Addiction, since they haven't announced any line up changes, it seems reasonable to assume that Robin will do that tour.



I just found it interesting that Axl really couldn't even answer questions about his own band. 2 drummers?

Couldn't or didn't want to?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 02:25:16 PM
Jim Bob, I am honestly not trying to fight with you, but let me say it like this. I hate Van Halen and I hate U2 ok.

In Bad Obsession, i think i have maybe a post or two in each section

U have over 750 posts in the VR section

Im just sayin, I sure as hell wouldn't post 750 times about a band i fucking hate.

Yeah, but what if Eddie or Bono had come to your house, shit on the floor, and killed your dog like Slash apparently did to some of these people?

Killing my dog is where I cross the line.

I'll be back in a few hours to further discuss this.

so don't think I am running from the argument, I just have some stuff to do.


I just don't like seeing all these headlines "Axl Rose calls Slash a Cancer"

I just think that is going to  cause even more harm to Axl then it will to Slash.

Axl is brutally honest though which is a part of why we all are huge fans of the guy.

Just because I don't always agree with him, doesn't mean I am not an enormous fan

think of anyone u like or admire: do u really agree 100 percent of the time?  Think of your best friend, family, other friends, I don't think u have to agree with them about everything to love and respect them.

that is just what I am getting at.

I would love to see a stickied thread with all the lies Slash has said over the years about Axl. Just to refresh and get some perspective.

I didn't join this forum till 2003 and to be honest, I haven't seen a whole lot of interviews before that year. So if he really spewed some hate filled shit, I'd like to read it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 03:00:54 PM
I would love to see a stickied thread with all the lies Slash has said over the years about Axl. Just to refresh and get some perspective.

I didn't join this forum till 2003 and to be honest, I haven't seen a whole lot of interviews before that year. So if he really spewed some hate filled shit, I'd like to read it.

Why does it have to be hate filled?

You don't think he knows what he's doing?

He just keeps repeating the history as he wants us to remember it. No matter that it's not true.

That went on for years. In addition, stories kept changing.



And you still wonder why Axl isn't happy about the things said about him?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 03:02:04 PM
Quote
I just don't like seeing all these headlines "Axl Rose calls Slash a Cancer"

I just think that is going to  cause even more harm to Axl then it will to Slash.
Axl is making the wrong headlines. The focus is on Slash and the old lineup and keeping the new band and album in the backseat.

That is just the wrong way to go if he wants to move on.

But he may not care because maybe these negative headlines will get people to possibly buy CD out of curiosity from all this drama. Id be interested to see how sales do in the next 2 weeks. Not that they will jump but they might bump up a little bit.

Its time for him and the band to start promoting this band and album....but I guess he cant because he doesnt have a lead guitarist to do so. Bucket and Finck have put him in a bad position


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 03:07:45 PM
Is he lying in his book when he talks about the UYI sessions and how Axl wouldn't show up to them in Chicago or wherever it was?

What about hiring Paul Huge without getting the rest of the band's input?

I think Slash has his share of blame for the breakup and I get where u are coming from how he does make it sound like its all Axl's fault in some of those interviews.

So yeah,Axl does have a right to be mad.

I think he should've came out with his side of the story in 1997 though and shouldn't wait till 12 years later. that is my only thing. I've never blamed Axl entirely for the breakup, I do think he has some blame just like everyone else though, but I just think he'd get further addressing it in a better, less rage filled manner.

That isn't his style though, but this isn't going to help him or change people's minds.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AdZ on February 28, 2009, 03:14:17 PM
Is he lying in his book when he talks about the UYI sessions and how Axl wouldn't show up to them in Chicago or wherever it was?



Slash?

Lie?


Never.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 03:16:44 PM
Axl is making the wrong headlines. The focus is on Slash and the old lineup and keeping the new band and album in the backseat.

Umm, do you think the opposite would've been better? "Axl says GN'R reunion might happen!"..


Last year I remember getting some shit from people because I removed a thread about "Axl meeting Slash in New York".

According to them, it really happened!

Maybe you don't like the headline, but hopefully it'll make that kind of bullshit stories and rumors go away once and for all.




Is he lying in his book when he talks about the UYI sessions and how Axl wouldn't show up to them in Chicago or wherever it was?

As far as I remember, Axl did show up.



What about hiring Paul Huge without getting the rest of the band's input?

That's how you can look at it if you want to make Slash into the poor victim.

What options did Slash offer to the situation? Did he suggest any guitarists?

So Axl made a decision, turns out Paul wrote a bunch of material on Chinese Democracy.


It always easy to just say "didn't he tell the truth?" when you don't have to take anything into consideration.

Did you ever think that maybe Slash was comfortable with a band that had an unhappy lead singer?

Meaning, maybe he didn't care to try to fix any problems because he was hoping Axl would be the one leaving?

When that didn't happen, he left hoping Axl wouldn't be able to do anything without him. And would be forced to ask him to return.

This is the same guy who wanted GN'R to record his 12 Snakepit songs and when it didn't happen took off to do it on his own.



I think Slash has his share of blame for the breakup and I get where u are coming from how he does make it sound like its all Axl's fault in some of those interviews.

They had issues with their singer in their current band as well.



I think he should've came out with his side of the story in 1997 though and shouldn't wait till 12 years later. that is my only thing.

Well, to be honest, the others have been telling their stories since 1996....

Just because they did so in 1996 hasn't stopped them from continuing.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on February 28, 2009, 03:18:42 PM

"He wrote that whole bit about not having his guitar in Vegas, I'd assume, to save face. "

What story is Axl refering to here? The two NY shows?


Patiently waiting for the new era of gnr to begin

You're waiting for Jesus, like always :P

Just enjoy the band and Axl performing whenever it happens :peace:

Quote from: Jarmo
Thank you Dr D!

Hahaha, always the best quotes at HTGTH :hihi:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on February 28, 2009, 03:26:16 PM
 "There is the distinct possibility that having his intentions in regard to me so deeply ingrained and his personal though guarded distaste for much of 'Appetite' other than his or Duff's playing, Slash either should not have been in Guns to begin with or should have left after 'Lies.' In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided -- and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better."

Now that the conclusion axl's reached thus far is told,

I think it's time you decided which side you're on.

Surely you can like any band any artist but your liking their music doesn't mean you have to love them in person, right?
So you can like slash's guitar and not support his deeds.

Yeah no point in taking sides blah blah but if you are commenting on non musical aspects then there's no middle viewpoint between GN'R and the slashers.

Is he lying in his book when he talks about the UYI sessions and how Axl wouldn't show up to them in Chicago or wherever it was?



Slash?

Lie?


Never.

unfortunate Tod crew, for example.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on February 28, 2009, 03:45:07 PM

I think it's time you decided which side you're on.

Surely you can like any band any artist but your liking their music doesn't mean you have to love them in person, right?



I never gotten into that whole argument thing.
Why I am here is because I love hearing Axl sing and watching him perform.

And of course because of the board. :beer:

Whats got me back into Axl was the attempt to explore and make new music, while keeping his own touch on it.

Do we really need a million bands playing the same music?
Isn't it enough with one oldguns, one Gorgoroth, one Buckethead, one Motley Crue, one The Prodigy?

Mindless entertainment and copycatting can be good too,-
But, I never had a real passion for a band unless it's something genuine the artist try express.


Sure, listening to Slash can feel good-
-but I'm not gonna comment much on him and his relationship unless they ask me :P

It's still great to see diferent sides of a story :peace:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 04:00:35 PM
Quote
Umm, do you think the opposite would've been better? "Axl says GN'R reunion might happen!"..

Umm, did I suggest he say the reverse ???

How about his first come back interview he discusses his feelings of the old lineup, lays out his side, answers some follow ups  and then says from here on out that issue is off topic from his end? And then talks about the new band and the making of CD, the future, his goals, his views,the weather, etc,etc  in that same interview as well as any future interviews,,,

again, not that hard...especially for someone who knows how to remain silent on certain issues


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 04:10:21 PM
Quote
Umm, do you think the opposite would've been better? "Axl says GN'R reunion might happen!"..

Umm, did I suggest he say the reverse ???

How about his first come back interview he discusses his feelings of the old lineup, lays out his side, answers some follow ups  and then says from here on out that issue is off topic from his end? And then talks about the new band and the making of CD, the future, his goals, his views,the weather, etc,etc  in that same interview as well as any future interviews,,,

again, not that hard...especially for someone who knows how to remain silent on certain issues


He doesn't have to say the opposite for the headlines!

I thought you could see that.



Did you ever read any old Axl interviews?

Did you get the impression that he talks about what he feels like? Even if it means he won't spend the whole interview talking about his current album?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 04:17:17 PM
Quote
He doesn't have to say the opposite for the headlines!

I thought you could see that.
Yea but the interview would be a one time deal in regards to headlines. Axl has spoken 3 different times and each have produced these negative headlines. Plus he has never said hes done talking about it. In fact, hes always implying that there is more that will come out. Not good.

A one time, lay it all out, type interview would have been the best way to handle the past and then move on.

Quote
Did you get the impression that he talks about what he feels like? Even if it means he won't spend the whole interview talking about his current album?
Can you stop telling me that Axl can do and say whatever he wants? Guess what...I already know that!

No one is disputing that. But with that comes consequences. We are trying to help Axl avoid some of those consequences


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AdZ on February 28, 2009, 04:20:21 PM
We are trying to help Axl avoid some of those consequences


What are you, his advisor?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 04:22:00 PM
Quote
What are you, his advisor?
If I was lucky enough to have that oppurtunity we probably wouldnt be having this convo right now about all this negativity : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 04:28:10 PM
Axl has spoken 3 different times and each have produced these negative headlines. Plus he has never said hes done talking about it. In fact, hes always implying that there is more that will come out. Not good.

Not good? In the sense that since you don't want to hear about it, it's not good?


A one time, lay it all out, type interview would have been the best way to handle the past and then move on.

Can you stop telling Axl how to conduct himself?



We are trying to help Axl avoid some of those consequences

How noble of you.

Can you stop acting like some kind of career guidance counselor?

Always with the career advice. What he should do instead of what he's done/doing.

What makes you suitable for the job?



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on February 28, 2009, 04:29:48 PM
Another thing, About the guitar and the Hard Rock

Slash is a guitar player, And I know most guitar players, TAKE their guitars with them on road trips cause hotel rooms get lonely and boring and when you get in your hotel room, u play around on your guitar.

So maybe they saw Slash with a guitar case headed up to his hotel room and for whatever reasons they got freaked out when he probably takes a guitar EVERYWHERE he goes.

what was the guy going to do? run past security with a guitar, jump on stage and start acoustically jamming on his electric?

Please

Yeah.... and I bet a famous musician gets bored in a hotel room let alone its Vegas  :rofl:  gimme a break Slash wanted to play, Axl said no and Slash looks stupid.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 04:31:02 PM
Quote
Not good? In the sense that since you don't want to hear about it, it's not good?
Who wants to hear about it besides hard core gnr fans? Will the avg grn or rock fan change their feeling about how they feel about the breakup of the old band?

Jarmo....NO ONE CARES...that ship has sailed.

Quote
Can you stop telling Axl how to conduct himself?
naaaaaaaaaa



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 04:32:54 PM
Jarmo....NO ONE CARES...that ship has sailed.

But but but... Since no one cares, why are there headlines on all major music web sites?  ???



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on February 28, 2009, 04:37:48 PM
Funny how people come here to defend Slash ! honest to god, the guy is a manipulator, liar, and is stuck in the 80's.  I prefer Robin's playing ! especially since he challenges himself to play diffrent.  Unlike Slash's recycled guitar riffs.  I believe everything Axl say's he wouldn't wait this long and just starting lying about this stuff.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 04:39:00 PM
Quote
But but but... Since no one cares, why are there headlines on all major music web sites?
Im talking about the fans. The majority of people think Axl broke up the old band and is a control freak. He unfortunately cannot change that. He is coming across as being a bitter person.

Hes better off just doing his own thing with the band and if people want to enjoy it, great, if not, fuk em

and Ill stop "telling" Axl what to do when you stop telling people what kind of fan they are, etc


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 04:47:04 PM
Quote
But but but... Since no one cares, why are there headlines on all major music web sites?
Im talking about the fans. The majority of people think Axl broke up the old band and is a control freak. He unfortunately cannot change that.

Nobody cares. Right.

Here you are posting away... Obviously you don't care.


Stop fooling yourself. When Axl speaks, people listen.

Even if it means they'll whine about what he said, what he didn't say, what they think he meant when he said something or what he should've said.



He is coming across as being a bitter person.


And when I said similar things about you, you said I was insulting you.




and Ill stop "telling" Axl what to do when you stop telling people what kind of fan they are, etc

A bit different.

I have my definition of the word "fan", you have yours.

Now, we both know you have no qualifications whatsoever to be managing Axl Rose's career from your computer desk. :)





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on February 28, 2009, 04:53:11 PM
Quote
Here you are posting away... Obviously you don't care
Did I say I didnt care?



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on February 28, 2009, 05:21:01 PM

"He wrote that whole bit about not having his guitar in Vegas, I'd assume, to save face. "

What story is Axl refering to here? The two NY shows?



*Ahem*


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: freddiebrph on February 28, 2009, 05:41:11 PM
Funny how people come here to defend Slash ! honest to god, the guy is a manipulator, liar, and is stuck in the 80's.  I prefer Robin's playing ! especially since he challenges himself to play diffrent.  Unlike Slash's recycled guitar riffs.  I believe everything Axl say's he wouldn't wait this long and just starting lying about this stuff.

God, I cant beleive this shit is back again.  The album comes out, and we are back to Axl vs slash for the 1000000000000000000th time.  How do you know slash is all that? I dont know either way.  Like Axl is perfect?  You dont know either one of them. I am happy you prefer robin over slash.  Doesnt change the fact that anyone even knows robin is because of the gnr name which SLASH was a MAJOR part of the success.  Like who ever you want.  I still dont know why we have to be on a certain side?  All I know is Axl is/was my favorite front man of all time.  When I hear all the classics, Slash was standing by his side.  He leaves, and all of a sudden his contributions dont exist?  Like which version you like.  You will NEVER change my mind, and I will NEVER change yours.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Death Cube K on February 28, 2009, 05:46:24 PM
So what was the point in this interview?

Clearly it wasn't talking about Chinese Democracy, so what was the deal?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: horsey on February 28, 2009, 05:51:54 PM
you know whats funny right now.that people bitch no matter what.when axl was silent they bitch no news ever.but now he opens up and gives a little more of himself to others.then you say he blew it with this interview and stuff negative.there was no real hope for a reunion ever i think.axl still needs to share his side still.if that is the case then so be it.at least axl is opening up.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Nytunz on February 28, 2009, 06:16:23 PM
Over thinking, over analyzing REALLY separates the body from the mind.

Axl has choose to communicate with Music.. he has given several inteviews, he has loged on this forum to chat with fans, and people had the chanse to ask him anything.. And now, after another interview made public, people are acting like this is his last, and critizise his way of doing it.. overanalyzing everything, and jugde his way of expressing imself... GnR fans may have patience and love for the band, but some are really troubled also...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Montrealrocks on February 28, 2009, 06:38:56 PM
ALways the same stuff.


When the album wasn't out, you guys were complaining about it.

When the album came out, you guys were asking when a dvd would come out, and when Chinese Democracy 2 was coming out.

When Axl doesn't give interviews you guys are begging him to do so.

When Axl DOES give an interview (and every time he does) you guys are whining about the fact that you don't like what he says!



One sentence is right for you.

GET ON BOARD OR FUCK OFF!

Jarmo, don't waste your time...;)



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 06:44:27 PM
So what was the point in this interview?

Clearly it wasn't talking about Chinese Democracy, so what was the deal?


Maybe he just felt like getting some things off his chest? :)



Talking of headlines: Guns N' Roses reunion? Axl Rose says heck no. (http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/02/guns-n-roses-re.html)  :D



Quote
Here you are posting away... Obviously you don't care
Did I say I didnt care?

Discussing with you is like talking to a rock.


Jarmo....NO ONE CARES...that ship has sailed.

At least the rock (not the "actor") is consistent in its beliefs instead of flip flopping every hour.

Wanna talk about how Axl's not focusing on Chinese Democracy again? Oh wait, then you agreed that recording the album and actually releasing it requires the artist to focus on said album. But you said he wasn't....

 :rofl:




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on February 28, 2009, 06:53:00 PM
When U look at this whole thing . Well it's nice to see Axl fucking Rose doing interviews. U don't have to like or agree with everything he says , but as a fan It's nice to see the man doing these thing.

Hopefully he does more , then maybe some touring With the boys for CD( Which is a kick ass album)!!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on February 28, 2009, 06:58:25 PM


Jarmo, don't waste your time...;)



Unfortunately, he has to.  Otherwise, the idiots would overrun this place and we would lose the one good place to post about Guns N' Roses.

Yours truly,
A-Fraud's Dirty Steroid Syringe, HTGTH personal adviser. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Death Cube K on February 28, 2009, 07:02:24 PM
Quote
Maybe he just felt like getting some things off his chest?

And that was smart?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on February 28, 2009, 07:07:56 PM
Gotta love people who knows how to run other peoples lives here...

ALways the same stuff.


When the album wasn't out, you guys were complaining about it.

When the album came out, you guys were asking when a dvd would come out, and when Chinese Democracy 2 was coming out.

When Axl doesn't give interviews you guys are begging him to do so.

When Axl DOES give an interview (and every time he does) you guys are whining about the fact that you don't like what he says!



One sentence is right for you.

GET ON BOARD OR FUCK OFF!

Jarmo, don't waste your time...;)


That's exactly my feelings.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 07:08:57 PM
Quote
Maybe he just felt like getting some things off his chest?

And that was smart?

Smart for who?


Axl's always said what's on his mind.

There's not many other artists like that around.

Everybody is too concerned about their images and scared to offend a possible record buyer to do that.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Death Cube K on February 28, 2009, 07:12:57 PM
Quote
Axl's always said what's on his mind.

Oh yes, he sure did.


Quote
There's not many other artists like that around.

Nope. Usually calling other people for "cancer" won't get you very far, professionally or otherwise.

He should learn from Duff and speak wisely and with care.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 07:17:14 PM
He should learn from Duff and speak wisely and with care.

Well people are different. If Duff was in Axl's shoes, who knows how he'd react?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 07:22:46 PM
Funny how people come here to defend Slash ! honest to god, the guy is a manipulator, liar, and is stuck in the 80's.  I prefer Robin's playing ! especially since he challenges himself to play diffrent.  Unlike Slash's recycled guitar riffs.  I believe everything Axl say's he wouldn't wait this long and just starting lying about this stuff.

I am sorry d ude but this shit is just ridiculous

Robin wrote one fucking song on CD

ONE fucking song in his entire life doesn't make him better than Slash. U do realize Robin makes his living in GNR mostly playing guitar riffs written by Slash right?

THat is the kind of nonsense that drives me crazy on GNR forums

Even if Slash is a liar and a piece of shit and all that, it still doesn't change the amazing stuff he wrote and did in GNR.

Shit, Robin has left Axl TWICE now, so why the hell does this guy who like I said, wrote one song on CD get a free pass?

Axl himself said that they were able to take the music further once Robin quit which basically is saying Robin isn't very good.



VR did have problems with Scott, but in Scott's last interview he said that he and Slash got a long great.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GunnerOne 84 on February 28, 2009, 07:25:15 PM
Quote
Axl's always said what's on his mind.

Oh yes, he sure did.


Quote
There's not many other artists like that around.

Nope. Usually calling other people for "cancer" won't get you very far, professionally or otherwise.

He should learn from Duff and speak wisely and with care.


I've had my fair share of criticisms of Axl, but I will say this in his defense (not that he really needs my help, but whatever):

Axl has never spoken on this. Whatever his side is, it's a side that hasn't been told in 14 years. Maybe he feels now that his album is out, he can get these things off his chest. He's entitled to this.

As far as "getting somewhere professionally", well he has accomplished more than most artists ever will, so I really doubt he cares. He doesn't play that game. Whether you agree or disagree, he does what he wants, when he wants, doesn't mince words, etc. I respect that even if sometimes as a fan it frustrates the hell out of me.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on February 28, 2009, 07:36:46 PM
Quote
Axl's always said what's on his mind.

Oh yes, he sure did.


Quote
There's not many other artists like that around.

Nope. Usually calling other people for "cancer" won't get you very far, professionally or otherwise.

He should learn from Duff and speak wisely and with care.


I've had my fair share of criticisms of Axl, but I will say this in his defense (not that he really needs my help, but whatever):

Axl has never spoken on this. Whatever his side is, it's a side that hasn't been told in 14 years. Maybe he feels now that his album is out, he can get these things off his chest. He's entitled to this.

As far as "getting somewhere professionally", well he has accomplished more than most artists ever will, so I really doubt he cares. He doesn't play that game. Whether you agree or disagree, he does what he wants, when he wants, doesn't mince words, etc. I respect that even if sometimes as a fan it frustrates the hell out of me.

He has given many interviews.... A long interview in 1999 to Kurt Loader.  One to David Frike.  David Wild went to his house and heard some songs.  Interviews during 04 and 06.  Bill Board, Message Board Rants, and Del James.. That is more than "being silent for 14 years".


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 07:38:58 PM
I wish Axl would tell us specifics of what Slash is lying about. He just says very cryptic stuff

I'd like for him to say

Slash said this, this, this

Here is what really happened.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 07:45:48 PM
ONE fucking song in his entire life doesn't make him better than Slash.

Maybe to somebody else it does?

I don't care how many hits Jon Bon Jovi has written, I still think Mark Lanegan is a far better singer and song writer.





Even if Slash is a liar and a piece of shit and all that, it still doesn't change the amazing stuff he wrote and did in GNR.

Even Axl acknowledged that.



VR did have problems with Scott, but in Scott's last interview he said that he and Slash got a long great.

Yeah, they sure seemed to get along great when they weren't even talking to each other.  : ok:



I wish Axl would tell us specifics of what Slash is lying about. He just says very cryptic stuff

Every time I've done that, your friends in the VR section started posting about me.  :hihi:



He has given many interviews.... A long interview in 1999 to Kurt Loader.  One to David Frike.  David Wild went to his house and heard some songs.  Interviews during 04 and 06.  Bill Board, Message Board Rants, and Del James.. That is more than "being silent for 14 years".


Oooh, so now he's given "many interviews" Yet people like to point out how silent he is?

Could you explain that? Which one is it?






/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 08:10:11 PM
Thats different Jarmo

Mark Lanegan is a talented singer/songwriter so if u want to say he is better. that is valid.

we are talking about essentially a career touring guitar player with one writing credit to his name.

I am sorry but that is just ridiculous.


Did u delete VR interviews that were negative about Axl back in the day? Cause to be honest, I haven't read a whole lot of VR interviews cause I don't remember nothing extremely over the top horrible. Certainly nothing on the "cancer" scale or insulting his talent.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 08:28:16 PM
Thats different Jarmo

Mark Lanegan is a talented singer/songwriter so if u want to say he is better. that is valid.

we are talking about essentially a career touring guitar player with one writing credit to his name.

I am sorry but that is just ridiculous.


It's about personal preference.

Not everybody rates a musician on how many songs he writes.






Certainly nothing on the "cancer" scale or insulting his talent.


Why do you keep repeating things that have been explained to you?

Did you ever think that it's probably not a matter of what words were used?

Wait, that makes no sense to you since I've kept repeating it over and over again. Just forget about it and go look for the cancer quotes from Slash.  ::)





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sandman on February 28, 2009, 08:31:56 PM
i feel bad for Axl. he does care probably more than anybody. and he's living in the shadow of the old GnR. a shadow that includes a man he despises. a man who has had significantly more success than Axl since they've gone their seperate ways. it's gotta be tough for him to have to deal with that.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 08:34:39 PM
i feel bad for Axl. he does care probably more than anybody. and he's living in the shadow of the old GnR. a shadow that includes a man he despises. a man who has had significantly more success than Axl since they've gone their seperate ways. it's gotta be tough for him to have to deal with that.

Not everybody is ready to prostitute themselves for some fame.


If Axl is living in this so called shadow, so are the others. Haven't seen them produce anything that has had the effect GN'R had.



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sandman on February 28, 2009, 08:39:24 PM
i feel bad for Axl. he does care probably more than anybody. and he's living in the shadow of the old GnR. a shadow that includes a man he despises. a man who has had significantly more success than Axl since they've gone their seperate ways. it's gotta be tough for him to have to deal with that.

Not everybody is ready to prostitute themselves for some fame.


If Axl is living in this so called shadow, so are the others. Haven't seen them produce anything that has had the effect GN'R had.



/jarmo

absolutely true. and i have alot of respect for Axl in that regard. but remember, to ALOT of bands, exclusive deals with Best Buy is a total whore move.

my point is, it's easy to accuse anyone famous of "prostituting themselves."


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 08:43:50 PM
absolutely true. and i have alot of respect for Axl in that regard. but remember, to ALOT of bands, exclusive deals with Best Buy is a total whore move.

my point is, it's easy to accuse anyone famous of "prostituting themselves."


Oh yes, releasing music makes you the biggest publicity whore and sell-out ever!

Why didn't I think of that?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sandman on February 28, 2009, 08:56:22 PM
absolutely true. and i have alot of respect for Axl in that regard. but remember, to ALOT of bands, exclusive deals with Best Buy is a total whore move.

my point is, it's easy to accuse anyone famous of "prostituting themselves."


Oh yes, releasing music makes you the biggest publicity whore and sell-out ever!

Why didn't I think of that?




/jarmo


jarmo, you can put words in people's mouths but it just hurts your argument. i'm not sure why my initial comment set you off since i was saying something really positive about axl caring more than most.

(just noticed you added a second comment to your previous reply, which i'll reply to here...)

of course the other members are living in that shadow. but they seem ok with that. they seem to embrace it. they recognize that something magical happened during that 6 or 7 year period that really connected with millions of people around the globe.

Axl didn't like living in the "shadow" of appetite in 1991! and now he's under a shadow far bigger than that one. and like i said, that shadow includes a man he despises.

and of course the other members haven't matched that success, but in the public's eye, they have done FAR more and FAR better than axl.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 09:04:59 PM
jarmo, you can put words in people's mouths but it just hurts your argument. i'm not sure why my initial comment set you off since i was saying something really positive about axl caring more than most.


Nothing set me off.

I just think it's amusing how you say one is living in the shadow and act like the others have managed to get out.

If you want to make a statement like that, make sure you include everybody in it.



Axl didn't like living in the "shadow" of appetite in 1991! and now he's under a shadow far bigger than that one. and like i said, that shadow includes a man he despises.

Well the same goes for the others. They all know that Axl was part of that band.

They'll also have to live with the fact that they quit. They chose to leave the band but still manage to milk that time they spent in the band for everything it's worth.


and of course the other members haven't matched that success, but in the public's eye, they have done FAR more and FAR better than axl.

They'll always be "former GN'R members".


I don't know how you come to the conclusion that to release an album is whoring one out.

Here you are being positive and everything....




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Deb Rose on February 28, 2009, 09:14:22 PM
Gotta love people who knows how to run other peoples lives here...

ALways the same stuff.


When the album wasn't out, you guys were complaining about it.

When the album came out, you guys were asking when a dvd would come out, and when Chinese Democracy 2 was coming out.

When Axl doesn't give interviews you guys are begging him to do so.

When Axl DOES give an interview (and every time he does) you guys are whining about the fact that you don't like what he says!



One sentence is right for you.

GET ON BOARD OR FUCK OFF!

Jarmo, don't waste your time...;)


That's exactly my feelings.

+1


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 09:18:48 PM
I think what Sandman is saying is, they kind of sold the album to the highest bidder. That could be seen in some circles as whoring your album to the highest bidder.

Maybe that was strictly the record labels doing, I have no idea.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sandman on February 28, 2009, 09:32:11 PM
jarmo, you can put words in people's mouths but it just hurts your argument. i'm not sure why my initial comment set you off since i was saying something really positive about axl caring more than most.


Nothing set me off.

I just think it's amusing how you say one is living in the shadow and act like the others have managed to get out.

If you want to make a statement like that, make sure you include everybody in it.



Axl didn't like living in the "shadow" of appetite in 1991! and now he's under a shadow far bigger than that one. and like i said, that shadow includes a man he despises.

Well the same goes for the others. They all know that Axl was part of that band.

They'll also have to live with the fact that they quit. They chose to leave the band but still manage to milk that time they spent in the band for everything it's worth.


and of course the other members haven't matched that success, but in the public's eye, they have done FAR more and FAR better than axl.

They'll always be "former GN'R members".


I don't know how you come to the conclusion that to release an album is whoring one out.

Here you are being positive and everything....




/jarmo

again, putting words in my mouth. i never acted "like the others have managed to get out." NOR did i ever come to the conlusion that "to release an album is whoring one out."

why so much focus on VR. i thought there was a section for that?

i agree...they do have to live with their decisions. it just doesn't seem to bother them much. i think they are happy to remember the good times with Axl as their frontman. they've all said nice things recently.

i feel bad for Axl cause for years i wrongly assumed that he was above all the bickering. i took his silence to mean it didn't bother him, he didn't care what was said, and he was taking the high road. turns out he DID care. big time. and now he's trying to make up for lost time and he's really put himself in a tough position. cause now he's criticizing the talents of a man that helped make Axl the person he is today.    


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 09:40:24 PM
I think what Sandman is saying is, they kind of sold the album to the highest bidder. That could be seen in some circles as whoring your album to the highest bidder.

Maybe that was strictly the record labels doing, I have no idea.

So if the alternative is no release at all, it would be better because you're not whoring yourself out?  ::)

All this time, it's one complaint after another from some of you.



again, putting words in my mouth. i never acted "like the others have managed to get out." NOR did i ever come to the conlusion that "to release an album is whoring one out."

No, you just liked to point out how Axl is the one living in the shadow and how successful the others have been.

You singled him out to make your point.

The fact is, the same goes for all of them. But you didn't care enough to make that observation since it was all about how Axl is living in the shadow...  ::)




cause now he's criticizing the talents of a man that helped make Axl the person he is today.    

The funny thing is that even Slash himself has admitted to some of the things Axl pointed out.

For example, his guitar work on the Contraband album. Apparently Slash was not happy with the end result....

Which is basically what Axl was saying, Slash isn't an artist that has kept growing. He doesn't seem inspired/motivated enough.

That's what he said.

You disagree and think all his guitar work after leaving GN'R has been mind blowing? Fine, your opinion.

You have your opinion, Axl has his. Pretty simple.


It's also worth noting that Axl said: "I'm not taking anything away from the man that are his to claim for his past efforts".


/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 09:47:47 PM
No No Jarmo, I was saying how the industry etc could perceive that as whoring.

I don't care about stuff like that. Personally I think whoring is when u do something non related to music just to try and stay in the limelight or revive your career. like reality show and shit like that.


if Axl does 2 million interviews, releases 1o videos and makes hundreds of appearances, that is fine cause that is what musicians and entertainers do. especially  mainstream huge artists.

I think people use the whoring thing too much to be honest. If u are famous and a mainstream band, u are technically selling yourself.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 10:01:04 PM
No No Jarmo, I was saying how the industry etc could perceive that as whoring.

I was commenting on sandman's claim that it could be seen as a "whore move".




I think people use the whoring thing too much to be honest.


Yeah. The thing is, if Axl went on one talk show, he would be labeled a media whore by some. Their logic is that if Slash is labeled one, the same goes for Axl.

The fact that it's not even in the same ballpark does not matter at all.


These are the same people who say things like "Axl should talk more and do more interviews". Well until he says something they don't like.  :hihi:




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on February 28, 2009, 10:22:05 PM
For me, it isn't what Axl says, it is how he says it.

I think he was a bit harsh but if that is what he wants to say, that is fine. I have accepted the fact that Axl will never win in the court of public opinion. So really, nothing he says or does is gonna affect him.

I just think there is a better way of going about addressing this stuff. A more focused, calm effort where he doesn't come off as angry and bitter about it.

Now Slash just has to come out and take the high road and he will come out and look  even more sympathetic.


I feel like Axl has sort of won this. He has the name, he has his freedom to do what he wants, everyone acknowledges what a talented and genius  guy he is.

Slash telling lies isn't the only reason he has a bad public persona. I think the riots, late starts, one in a million etc etc have a bit to do with that also. Certainly stories the old band members said about him don't help.

I just don't get why he is so pissed at only Slash. I mean Izzy called him fucking Hitler in an interview and he still loves izzy.

He also didn't do himself any favors saying he'd still work with Izzy and Duff.

I mean if u are going from no reunion, to now working with Izzy and Duff............ next step is Slash and there u go.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on February 28, 2009, 10:30:07 PM
cause now he's criticizing the talents of a man that helped make Axl the person he is today.    

The funny thing is that even Slash himself has admitted to some of the things Axl pointed out.

For example, his guitar work on the Contraband album. Apparently Slash was not happy with the end result....

Which is basically what Axl was saying, Slash isn't an artist that has kept growing. He doesn't seem inspired/motivated enough.

That's what he said.

You disagree and think all his guitar work after leaving GN'R has been mind blowing? Fine, your opinion.

You have your opinion, Axl has his. Pretty simple.


It's also worth noting that Axl said: "I'm not taking anything away from the man that are his to claim for his past efforts".


/jarmo
[/quote]

Jarmo, Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc....  I think the playing on You Got No Right, Fall To Pieces, Slither, and Alien is all top notch, it was Josh Abraham and the way he had to record in a booth that he wasn't fond of and felt held back at times.  Doesn't mean Slash wasn't motivated or wasn't trying.  It means he didn't like the way the producer did things. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 11:02:43 PM
Jarmo, Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc....  I think the playing on You Got No Right, Fall To Pieces, Slither, and Alien is all top notch, it was Josh Abraham and the way he had to record in a booth that he wasn't fond of and felt held back at times.  Doesn't mean Slash wasn't motivated or wasn't trying.  It means he didn't like the way the producer did things. 


"All in all, my playing is very reserved on that record, which is why there aren't as many solos as there could have been. I felt too restricted to improvise the way I usually do." - page 441

All this because he wanted to save some money by changing the studio where he did his parts.

Art doesn't come first for everybody....


/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on February 28, 2009, 11:31:27 PM
Jarmo, Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc....  I think the playing on You Got No Right, Fall To Pieces, Slither, and Alien is all top notch, it was Josh Abraham and the way he had to record in a booth that he wasn't fond of and felt held back at times.  Doesn't mean Slash wasn't motivated or wasn't trying.  It means he didn't like the way the producer did things. 


"All in all, my playing is very reserved on that record, which is why there aren't as many solos as there could have been. I felt too restricted to improvise the way I usually do." - page 441

All this because he wanted to save some money by changing the studio where he did his parts.

Art doesn't come first for everybody....


/jarmo

Isn't that the same thing I said?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on February 28, 2009, 11:49:59 PM
Jarmo, Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc....  I think the playing on You Got No Right, Fall To Pieces, Slither, and Alien is all top notch, it was Josh Abraham and the way he had to record in a booth that he wasn't fond of and felt held back at times.  Doesn't mean Slash wasn't motivated or wasn't trying.  It means he didn't like the way the producer did things. 


"All in all, my playing is very reserved on that record, which is why there aren't as many solos as there could have been. I felt too restricted to improvise the way I usually do." - page 441

All this because he wanted to save some money by changing the studio where he did his parts.

Art doesn't come first for everybody....


/jarmo

Isn't that the same thing I said?


I thought you were talking about how it was recorded, not how his playing is.

Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc.... 


While Slash mentions his playing being reserved, not the sound quality of the recording of his playing.

He even mentions the lack of solos.



"Very reserved" doesn't sound like a guy who's trying to push the envelope.

Sure, the experience is blamed on the equipment and producer, but Slash put himself in that studio due to him wanting to save some money.



If Axl thinks Slash's output hasn't been anything special, it's his opinion. Even Slash himself admits to having recording experiences that weren't to his liking (even though he has himself to blame).

So what's the problem if Axl  thinks Slash's material hasn't been to his liking? Is he not allowed to have an opinion?

So it's ok for you to say you don't like the guitars on Chinese Democracy, but when Axl says he doesn't like listening to Slash, he's the Antichrist?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 01, 2009, 12:23:26 AM
Jarmo, Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc....  I think the playing on You Got No Right, Fall To Pieces, Slither, and Alien is all top notch, it was Josh Abraham and the way he had to record in a booth that he wasn't fond of and felt held back at times.  Doesn't mean Slash wasn't motivated or wasn't trying.  It means he didn't like the way the producer did things. 


"All in all, my playing is very reserved on that record, which is why there aren't as many solos as there could have been. I felt too restricted to improvise the way I usually do." - page 441

All this because he wanted to save some money by changing the studio where he did his parts.

Art doesn't come first for everybody....


/jarmo

Isn't that the same thing I said?


I thought you were talking about how it was recorded, not how his playing is.

Slash wasn't happy with the "RECORDING" of his Guitar parts and the mix, etc.... 


While Slash mentions his playing being reserved, not the sound quality of the recording of his playing.

He even mentions the lack of solos.



"Very reserved" doesn't sound like a guy who's trying to push the envelope.

Sure, the experience is blamed on the equipment and producer, but Slash put himself in that studio due to him wanting to save some money.



If Axl thinks Slash's output hasn't been anything special, it's his opinion. Even Slash himself admits to having recording experiences that weren't to his liking (even though he has himself to blame).

So what's the problem if Axl  thinks Slash's material hasn't been to his liking? Is he not allowed to have an opinion?

So it's ok for you to say you don't like the guitars on Chinese Democracy, but when Axl says he doesn't like listening to Slash, he's the Antichrist?




/jarmo


I think it actually burns Axl inside when Slash doesn't live up to potential because he knows that a guy like Finck alone could never fill the shoes of Slash and he may feel Slash pisses he talent away and could still be in GNR, but in his mind took the easy way out.  I think Slash at the Jimi Hendrix Tribute playing Hey Joe, and his new song Vocalise are two songs where he was on his A game.  On Vocalise Slash does push the envelope.  Many of Slash's solos on Contraband I find better than those on CD. 

Axl is entitled to an opinion, and he does know Slash was/is a special player.. Weather he wants to say that anymore is another story.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 12:31:55 AM
i for one am shocked and stunned that Smoking Guns is on the Slash side of this argument.  :o


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: axlrosegnr on March 01, 2009, 12:54:45 AM
You know what? "D" is a cancer...and needs to be removed. He's the one stupid asshole that just never stops. Fuck him, cut him out like the tumor that he is and throw him in the trash.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: adman2374 on March 01, 2009, 01:05:31 AM
I do not like VR at all and would never buy their cd's or go to their shows. I read what you wrote, but please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't you support and attend several VR concerts? I remember seeing you in several pics with big smiles at VR shows.....ps. this is referring to big guy jarmos posts...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: gilee7 on March 01, 2009, 01:10:20 AM
God, this is ridiculous. Seriously, what the fuck is the big deal here? Axl called Slash a "cancer." So what? It isn't a secret that Axl and Slash aren't the best of friends. Love him or hate him for it, Axl has always been the kind of guy who speaks his mind and tells it like it is, regardless of who he may offend in the process.

I can't believe all the bickering back and forth that's going on in this thread. Aren't we all members of the same team? We're fans of Guns N' Roses--- past, present, and future.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: kmorgan on March 01, 2009, 01:20:37 AM
God, this is ridiculous. Seriously, what the fuck is the big deal here? Axl called Slash a "cancer." So what? It isn't a secret that Axl and Slash aren't the best of friends. Love him or hate him for it, Axl has always been the kind of guy who speaks his mind and tells it like it is, regardless of who he may offend in the process.

I can't believe all the bickering back and forth that's going on in this thread. Aren't we all members of the same team? We're fans of Guns N' Roses--- past, present, and future.


Someone finally said it!  This is exactly how I feel.  Slash and Axl don't have to like eachother, but that doesn't mean we can't like both.  I like Slash simply because he was a part of a band that I love, and I love Axl because I just do, and don't feel any explanation is needed.  Like it or not, without Axl's voice, there is no GnR, and I'm just glad to finally hear it again, so worrying about what was or what could have been just seems pointless.  Who cares about what they say about eachother... let's just enjoy the music.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: kmorgan on March 01, 2009, 01:27:23 AM
For me, it isn't what Axl says, it is how he says it.

I think he was a bit harsh but if that is what he wants to say, that is fine. I have accepted the fact that Axl will never win in the court of public opinion. So really, nothing he says or does is gonna affect him.

I just think there is a better way of going about addressing this stuff. A more focused, calm effort where he doesn't come off as angry and bitter about it.

Now Slash just has to come out and take the high road and he will come out and look  even more sympathetic.


I feel like Axl has sort of won this. He has the name, he has his freedom to do what he wants, everyone acknowledges what a talented and genius  guy he is.

Slash telling lies isn't the only reason he has a bad public persona. I think the riots, late starts, one in a million etc etc have a bit to do with that also. Certainly stories the old band members said about him don't help.

I just don't get why he is so pissed at only Slash. I mean Izzy called him fucking Hitler in an interview and he still loves izzy.

He also didn't do himself any favors saying he'd still work with Izzy and Duff.

I mean if u are going from no reunion, to now working with Izzy and Duff............ next step is Slash and there u go.



We all fell in love with this band partially because of the way Axl says what he says.  He's never been known for being mild, and that's one of the many things I love about him, and a big part of what made and makes GnR so incredible.  I get what you're saying, but again, that's the attitude that makes him who he is, and I love it!!!!!!!!!  Could we really expect anything less?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sworrm on March 01, 2009, 08:48:49 AM
At the end of the day i personally dont care whos fault anything is im just into the music. I dont have to like the musician or his views to love there music. I think Axl is more talented than Slash but cant take ote away from Slash"s playing on Appetite and illusions. Hopefully now Axl has gotten that off his chest he will start talking more about the present and future and less about the past


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Neemo on March 01, 2009, 09:00:10 AM
some peopel are too quick to point fingers and label someone as choosing "sides" ... some poepel are jsut calling a spade a spade, we've been told for years to stop living in past and slash isnt in the band anymore...yet all axl talks about is Slash and the old band....

in anycase, there are those who love both sides of this bitter personal battle and just as I appreciate Slash taking the high road as of late where Axl is concerned i'd like to see the same in return, cuz they dont get along with each other doesnt make me stop liking one of them, i enjoy music form both

that being said, one could deduce that the album is about peopel that have screwed over Axl over the years, the old band being some of them, so in that instance Axl is promoting his album, kinda

Also we have the Izzy and Duff thing that Axl keeps mentioning as possibly workign with them in some capacity at some point..well the unreleased track "Down By The Ocean" is from a writing session between Izzy and Duff in abouts 1995 (Which Axl confirmed as a real GnR working track in December 08) ... so there is a bit info as to where thats coming from, and by putting down the old band he sets up possible promo for the current band

anyway, I for one like seeing Ax talkin, i just hope one day that is swings to straight up promotion of the album he is apparently "concentrating on" maybe when the Better vid or the 3rd Single hits the airwaves huh?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Drew on March 01, 2009, 09:04:40 AM
Good points made Neemo.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 01, 2009, 09:06:02 AM
I think it actually burns Axl inside when Slash doesn't live up to potential because he knows that a guy like Finck alone could never fill the shoes of Slash
Says the guy who always hated Robin. Wonder why Axl don't just replace Robin, if that's the case, instead of waiting to see how it comes out.

Also, it's not just a matter of skills, I'm pretty sure. I think it's pretty selfish to want two people who had several personal issues to get back togheter just because you think so. I'm sure you wouldn't want to get back at your old girlfriend just because your friends want you to do so.

I can't believe all the bickering back and forth that's going on in this thread. Aren't we all members of the same team? We're fans of Guns N' Roses--- past, present, and future.
I actually agree with you in some parts, but no, we're not members of the same team. It's very clear there are people who are not fan of the present and future here. Still, they all take the same rote: Axl is wrong and should do this and that, and Slash is never to blame. It's about time to recognize those people can't get along without being harmful.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: 14 Yrs Of Silence on March 01, 2009, 10:46:48 AM
Now that that I've finally had enough time to re-read the interview, a few bits that stand out for me.

Regarding Izzy:
He called, asked to come out and negotiated a deal with management that it's probably best that none of us knew about or the fun would've seemed a bit more like being used or taken advantage of spoiling the moment. As it was, we had a great time.

I'm very curious about this "deal" he negotiated.  I get the impression that Axl feels Izzys participation in the '06 shows was more about Izzy promoting his own thing rather than him doing it out of love and respect for Axl.

Steven [Adler] brings assorted ambulance-chasing attorneys and the nightmare of his mother.

This quote is funny...especially after seeing Steven's mom on the Celebrity Rehab, I totally get it!

There is the distinct possibility that having his intentions in regard to me so deeply ingrained and his personal though guarded distaste for much of 'Appetite' other than his or Duff's playing, Slash either should not have been in Guns to begin with or should have left after 'Lies.' In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided -- and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better.

Interesting that Axl feels that Slash does not like Appetite other than his and Duff's parts.  What could Slash possibly have issue with?

I prefer listening to others in general, especially those who both push their talents and infuse them with a level of energy that I've seldom heard in his efforts over the years. I'm not taking anything away from the man that are his to claim for his past efforts; it's just that for whatever reason for me, whether the approach, style or basic hands-on technique is there, the passion and true dedication to the art of guitar in his chosen area other than being, in my opinion, a whore for the limelight has generally seemed absent or lacking with most efforts for a long time. To me, it's sad. I don't get it. Where does it go? Is it a choice? Sometimes it's there on covers; I think Clive [Davis, legendary record executive] fell for that.

I have a couple thoughts here.  First, Axl sure does pay a lot of attention to what Slash is up to at any given time.  Second, I can appreciate the fact that Axl believes that Slash's passion is not there in the way it was in the early days.  However, I wonder what would have been possible had Slash continued to work with Axl in a manner than was productive...I am sure he would have created more inspired work than he has with Snakepit and VR.

One other comment.  Axl does not think the Illusion albums were good enough...however in my opinion, they are great!  While perhaps the sound was acheived differently than Appetite, I love those albums and Gn'R would not have been my favorite band had they not released those.  I think Illusions was a great progression from Appetite, and think they still hold up really well today.  Don't be so hard on those albums Axl!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: sandman on March 01, 2009, 11:07:25 AM
I think what Sandman is saying is, they kind of sold the album to the highest bidder. That could be seen in some circles as whoring your album to the highest bidder.

Maybe that was strictly the record labels doing, I have no idea.

So if the alternative is no release at all, it would be better because you're not whoring yourself out?  ::)

All this time, it's one complaint after another from some of you.



again, putting words in my mouth. i never acted "like the others have managed to get out." NOR did i ever come to the conlusion that "to release an album is whoring one out."

No, you just liked to point out how Axl is the one living in the shadow and how successful the others have been.

You singled him out to make your point.

The fact is, the same goes for all of them. But you didn't care enough to make that observation since it was all about how Axl is living in the shadow...  ::)




cause now he's criticizing the talents of a man that helped make Axl the person he is today.    

The funny thing is that even Slash himself has admitted to some of the things Axl pointed out.

For example, his guitar work on the Contraband album. Apparently Slash was not happy with the end result....

Which is basically what Axl was saying, Slash isn't an artist that has kept growing. He doesn't seem inspired/motivated enough.

That's what he said.

You disagree and think all his guitar work after leaving GN'R has been mind blowing? Fine, your opinion.

You have your opinion, Axl has his. Pretty simple.


It's also worth noting that Axl said: "I'm not taking anything away from the man that are his to claim for his past efforts".


/jarmo

i highlighted the bullshit and the lies you made about my comments above. i clearly have not said those things and already pointed it out once. it weakens YOUR points when you have to resort to that.

i know it's your job to defend Axl at all costs, so i'm not gonna waste time discussing this stuff with someone that will never look at it objectively.

i'll just say what i said before....i feel bad for him. i feel bad that this stuff bothers him so much. i feel bad that he waited so long to address these issues. and i feel bad that the public has seen and heard more of Slash's material in recent years. and that the public views CD as a joke, and believe Slash has been far more successful.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: victor08 on March 01, 2009, 11:14:18 AM
Now that that I've finally had enough time to re-read the interview, a few bits that stand out for me.

Regarding Izzy:
He called, asked to come out and negotiated a deal with management that it's probably best that none of us knew about or the fun would've seemed a bit more like being used or taken advantage of spoiling the moment. As it was, we had a great time.

I'm very curious about this "deal" he negotiated.  I get the impression that Axl feels Izzys participation in the '06 shows was more about Izzy promoting his own thing rather than him doing it out of love and respect for Axl.

Steven [Adler] brings assorted ambulance-chasing attorneys and the nightmare of his mother.

This quote is funny...especially after seeing Steven's mom on the Celebrity Rehab, I totally get it!

There is the distinct possibility that having his intentions in regard to me so deeply ingrained and his personal though guarded distaste for much of 'Appetite' other than his or Duff's playing, Slash either should not have been in Guns to begin with or should have left after 'Lies.' In a nutshell, personally I consider him a cancer and better removed, avoided -- and the less anyone heard of him or his supporters, the better.

Interesting that Axl feels that Slash does not like Appetite other than his and Duff's parts.  What could Slash possibly have issue with?

I prefer listening to others in general, especially those who both push their talents and infuse them with a level of energy that I've seldom heard in his efforts over the years. I'm not taking anything away from the man that are his to claim for his past efforts; it's just that for whatever reason for me, whether the approach, style or basic hands-on technique is there, the passion and true dedication to the art of guitar in his chosen area other than being, in my opinion, a whore for the limelight has generally seemed absent or lacking with most efforts for a long time. To me, it's sad. I don't get it. Where does it go? Is it a choice? Sometimes it's there on covers; I think Clive [Davis, legendary record executive] fell for that.

I have a couple thoughts here.  First, Axl sure does pay a lot of attention to what Slash is up to at any given time.  Second, I can appreciate the fact that Axl believes that Slash's passion is not there in the way it was in the early days.  However, I wonder what would have been possible had Slash continued to work with Axl in a manner than was productive...I am sure he would have created more inspired work than he has with Snakepit and VR.

One other comment.  Axl does not think the Illusion albums were good enough...however in my opinion, they are great!  While perhaps the sound was acheived differently than Appetite, I love those albums and Gn'R would not have been my favorite band had they not released those.  I think Illusions was a great progression from Appetite, and think they still hold up really well today.  Don't be so hard on those albums Axl!

i agree. i love the illusions albums and the spaghetti incident. they picked great songs to cover, and some are even better than the originals, like human being. they did an amazing job on that song, and i'm a HUGE new york dolls fan, so that says something!  : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok: : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 11:38:02 AM
You know what? "D" is a cancer...and needs to be removed. He's the one stupid asshole that just never stops. Fuck him, cut him out like the tumor that he is and throw him in the trash.
add younggunner to that too.    both of these guys do nothing but complain about shit.   with "fans" like them, who needs detractors.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 11:44:04 AM
i highlighted the bullshit and the lies you made about my comments above.

Sorry, but some of the so called bullshit was aimed at D and some were general comments.

Some of you get upset because Axl doesn't like Slash's recent playing. It's his opinion and he should be able to have one. As I said, if you disagree and think Slash's playing has been great, that's your opinion.

I didn't mean to offend you by implying that you like Slash's recent playing.  :hihi:


You can twist it anyway you want, I saw your post and how you made it all about how sad it is for Axl to live in the shadow of the old band. When the fact is, if one is there, so are the others.  That's the point. : ok:



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on March 01, 2009, 11:45:32 AM
You know what? "D" is a cancer...and needs to be removed. He's the one stupid asshole that just never stops. Fuck him, cut him out like the tumor that he is and throw him in the trash.

I think that's going pretty low.  Nobody deserves to be talked about like that.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: H76 on March 01, 2009, 11:56:20 AM
God, this is ridiculous. Seriously, what the fuck is the big deal here? Axl called Slash a "cancer." So what? It isn't a secret that Axl and Slash aren't the best of friends. Love him or hate him for it, Axl has always been the kind of guy who speaks his mind and tells it like it is, regardless of who he may offend in the process.

I can't believe all the bickering back and forth that's going on in this thread. Aren't we all members of the same team? We're fans of Guns N' Roses--- past, present, and future.


Someone finally said it!  This is exactly how I feel.  Slash and Axl don't have to like eachother, but that doesn't mean we can't like both.  I like Slash simply because he was a part of a band that I love, and I love Axl because I just do, and don't feel any explanation is needed.  Like it or not, without Axl's voice, there is no GnR, and I'm just glad to finally hear it again, so worrying about what was or what could have been just seems pointless.  Who cares about what they say about eachother... let's just enjoy the music.

Exactly. We have much more to look forward to than in years. Lets just enjoy it, OK ?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 12:09:12 PM
God, this is ridiculous. Seriously, what the fuck is the big deal here? Axl called Slash a "cancer." So what? It isn't a secret that Axl and Slash aren't the best of friends. Love him or hate him for it, Axl has always been the kind of guy who speaks his mind and tells it like it is, regardless of who he may offend in the process.

Exactly what I've been trying to tell people. For some reason it hasn't registered with some.

If you go back and read some older Axl interviews, for example the Rolling Stone one from 1992, you'll see that he's always been the kind of guy who talks about what he feels like talking about.

He didn't spend that whole interview promoting the Use Your Illusion albums. Same thing with Del James' 1992 Axl interview in RIP.




I can't believe all the bickering back and forth that's going on in this thread. Aren't we all members of the same team? We're fans of Guns N' Roses--- past, present, and future.

Interesting point.

This is why some of the people who think they're on the team get upset.

Just because I have a different opinion on what it means to be in the team.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 12:17:52 PM
Quote
You know what? "D" is a cancer...and needs to be removed. He's the one stupid asshole that just never stops. Fuck him, cut him out like the tumor that he is and throw him in the trash.
Quote
add younggunner to that too.    both of these guys do nothing but complain about shit.   with "fans" like them, who needs detractors.
:rofl: :rofl:

imagine if I made or supported those comments. Isnt that grounds for removal Jarmo? Isnt that a "horrific" insult? Or can I throw around similar statements...just change the names to the people who I feel belong in that statement?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 12:23:58 PM
Quote
You know what? "D" is a cancer...and needs to be removed. He's the one stupid asshole that just never stops. Fuck him, cut him out like the tumor that he is and throw him in the trash.
Quote
add younggunner to that too.    both of these guys do nothing but complain about shit.   with "fans" like them, who needs detractors.
:rofl: :rofl:

imagine if I made or supported those comments. Isnt that grounds for removal Jarmo? Isnt that a "horrific" insult? Or can I throw around similar statements...just change the names to the people who I feel belong in that statement?

i dont come here day after day for the sake of complaining about axl rose and causing arguments with GnR fans.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: darthdios on March 01, 2009, 12:25:19 PM
this is really sad, so much  hate inside Axl?s heart it?s no good for him, and for his life, Axl must forgive Slash for anything, the real cancer is Axl?s hate, i?m feel so bad and sad for him, he was my idol, but with this , no more.
I hope Axl know how to forgive, and when that happens, he will have peace inside of him, so many of us love GN?R,Axl and Slash at  the same time.

 :'(


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 12:26:03 PM
imagine if I made or supported those comments. Isnt that grounds for removal Jarmo? Isnt that a "horrific" insult? Or can I throw around similar statements...just change the names to the people who I feel belong in that statement?

Poor you.

Remember when you told me I could just ban you with no protest from you the next time you broke the rules? Then when I pointed out the insult in your post, you just said it's no big deal and I should be able to take it.

Now you're upset?

So, are you gonna acknowledge your promise (and get banned for good) and have me yell at Jim Bob?

You can't have one without the other.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on March 01, 2009, 12:31:52 PM
Quote
You know what? "D" is a cancer...and needs to be removed. He's the one stupid asshole that just never stops. Fuck him, cut him out like the tumor that he is and throw him in the trash.
Quote
add younggunner to that too.    both of these guys do nothing but complain about shit.   with "fans" like them, who needs detractors.
:rofl: :rofl:

imagine if I made or supported those comments. Isnt that grounds for removal Jarmo? Isnt that a "horrific" insult? Or can I throw around similar statements...just change the names to the people who I feel belong in that statement?

 ::) How "horrific" an insult can it be since your reply when it was said about you was :rofl: :rofl:  ??


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 12:34:48 PM
Quote
Remember when you told me I could just ban you with no protest from you the next time you broke the rules? Then when I pointed out the insult in your post, you just said it's no big deal and I should be able to take it.

Now you're upset?

So, are you gonna acknowledge your promise (and get banned for good) and have me yell at Jim Bob?

You can't have one without the other.
i guess you didnt notice the  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:  it means I can take it : ok:

Comments on here cannot not upset me. Only if I stoop down to the sensitivity levels that exist here.

Quote
So, are you gonna acknowledge your promise (and get banned for good) and have me yell at Jim Bob?

You can't have one without the other.
I never knew I made this sort of deal with you. I said if you had to ban someone or whatever because of comments that I have pointed out would mean I get banned as well? Interesting

For the record I dont care if Jimbo and the other get banned or not. Im just pointing out the fact that if other people around here, including myself, made those comments, then that post would have been removed and or they would have been banned.

Quote
Poor you.
Jarmo, to quote the great Axl Rose...
"Im sorry for you, not sorry for me"  ;D

Quote
i dont come here day after day for the sake of complaining about axl rose and causing arguments with GnR fans.
nor do I....I come here read the news,etc and discuss it. Some of it I agree with, some I dont. If you cant handle people with opposing views than that sucks for you. My day isnt ruined because Jimbo, Jarmo, and others dont see things the way I or others see them. I can only voice my interpretation and stance....if people have similar or the same viewpoints, cool...if not...not a big deal....follow that and you wont come across as a  :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X


Quote
How "horrific" an insult can it be since your reply when it was said about you was    ??
lol thanks for making my point : ok:

and the best part is you werent trying to help me :hihi:




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on March 01, 2009, 12:37:18 PM
Argue away the way you want, but I still say the original comments up above were pretty low and shouldn't have been said.  People can have differing opinions and that's fine, but I think namecalling like that is out of line. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 12:42:56 PM
I never knew I made this sort of deal with you.

Of course you don't, it was a few months ago.

Do you want me to quote the PM?

It's from one of those multiple messages you sent me asking me to let you back in. Which is something you kinda deny doing.

For some reason your tone isn't as "tough" in those messages.  :o





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 01, 2009, 12:43:01 PM
Jarmo, in your life, has Axl Rose ever "rubbed" you the wrong way?  And I don't want to hear, "I love Axl for Axl", or "he just speaks his mind", yada, yada, yada... Have you ever been objective and said, "hmmm, not sure what Axl is trying to say there", or "That doesn't really make sense, I call BS".  I am not challenging your fanhood, just curious if all that Axl does is justifiable because he is "AXL FUCKING ROSE", or do you too find some of his actions questionable.  I know everyone makes mistakes, everyone has bad days.. What mistakes or bad days do you think Axl may have had in YOUR eyes.  Is there a single moment you can mention?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 12:58:29 PM
Jarmo, in your life, has Axl Rose ever "rubbed" you the wrong way?  And I don't want to hear, "I love Axl for Axl", or "he just speaks his mind", yada, yada, yada... Have you ever been objective and said, "hmmm, not sure what Axl is trying to say there", or "That doesn't really make sense, I call BS".  I am not challenging your fanhood, just curious if all that Axl does is justifiable because he is "AXL FUCKING ROSE", or do you too find some of his actions questionable.  I know everyone makes mistakes, everyone has bad days.. What mistakes or bad days do you think Axl may have had in YOUR eyes.  Is there a single moment you can mention?

It always comes to this with the Slash fans.... You want me to list Axl's mistakes to prove to yourselves that I'm such a big ass kisser because I won't play your game!

Go ahead, see if I fucking care!


The difference is that, yes he's Axl Rose, but I know that he's a human being just like the rest of us. He happens to be very talented, but still a human being.

That kinda helps one understand things.


If something doesn't make sense to me, I either try to understand it or I know for a fact that it makes no sense to me because I'm not Axl Rose!

Each one of us makes decisions based on what we know, think and how we feel etc. I bet the same goes for Axl.

The only difference is that none of us live the life he lives, so understanding how he makes his decisions isn't as easy. How many of us can relate to the life he lives?

Do you often stand in front of thousands of people while putting everything you got into it? Do you put personal things out there for everybody to analyze and judge? Are you pretty much in charge of an international brand?



In my opinion, pointing fingers and "calling bs" when you don't know the reason(s) makes one look like an ignorant fool.

Some are happy to be that ignorant fool. I try not to be.





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 12:59:51 PM
Quote
Of course you don't, it was a few months ago.

Do you want me to quote the PM?

It's from one of those multiple messages you sent me asking me to let you back in. Which is something you kinda deny doing.

For some reason your tone isn't as "tough" in those messages.  

When have I denied writing you multiple messages? Since you always bring nonsense like this into these threads Ill tell all that care(nobody)...

ladies and gents....from time to time Jarmo bans me because I would talk about leaks, make "insulting" comments, or because of some other god knows what "anti" gnr statements I have made. Im not sure how many times Ive been banned but I believe its <5. Being that I ultimately rather post here than anywhere else, I do what anyone who wants to be considered for reinstatement would do.....pm the king....So I discuss with the king the commenst that were made. Ask for his forgiveness and to his credit he lets me back(maybe because in reality my comments arent that absurd?) ....and to my credit I havnt broken any of his rules since he let me back..which was I believe the summer

what Yarmo always fails to mention is the countless Aim arguments we would have in which I would have the same tone on there as I do on here.
So yes Yarmo, I came to you and asked for forgiveness.

Being that Yarmo always hangs this over my head in almost every thread I am assuming you all care about it. So if your pissed Im still posting here....blame Canada Yarmo

Quote
It always comes to this with the Slash fans.... You want me to list Axl's mistakes to prove to yourselves that I'm such a big ass kisser because I won't play your game!

Go ahead, see if I fucking care!


The difference is that, yes he's Axl Rose, but I know that he's a human being just like the rest of us. He happens to be very talented, but still a human being.

That kinda helps one understand things.


If something doesn't make sense to me, I either try to understand it or I know for a fact that it makes no sense to me because I'm not Axl Rose!

Each one of us makes decisions based on what we know, think and how we feel etc. I bet the same goes for Axl.

The only difference is that none of us live the life he lives, so understanding how he makes his decisions isn't as easy. How many of us can relate to the life he lives?

Do you often stand in front of thousands of people while putting everything you got into it? Do you put personal things out there for everybody to analyze and judge? Are you pretty much in charge of an international brand?



In my opinion, pointing fingers and "calling bs" when you don't know the reason(s) makes one look like an ignorant fool.

Some are happy to be that ignorant fool. I try not to be.

your "answer" to smoking guns million dollar question would be legit f you applied that same post to Slash and the others when analyzing their comemnts and actions. Your answer only applies to when your talking about Axl.

Quote
n my opinion, pointing fingers and "calling bs" when you don't know the reason(s) makes one look like an ignorant fool.

:rofl: :rofl:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 01:08:01 PM
ladies and gents....from time to time Jarmo bans me because I would talk about leaks, make "insulting" comments, or because of some other god knows what "anti" gnr statements I have made.

Breaking the rules.

Trying to be a smart ass is another....

Knowing damn well what you did was wrong, but still doing it.



what Yarmo always fails to mention is the countless Aim arguments we would have in which I would have the same tone on there as I do on here.

You also fail to mention how you didn't like when I stopped wasting my time with you. :)


Being that Yarmo always hangs this over my head in almost every thread I am assuming you all care about it. So if your pissed Im still posting here....blame Canada Yarmo

You're so two-faced it's actually funny.

Even in this thread your opinion has changed within a few hours.

When it's pointed out to you, you ignore it and try to act like nothing happened.


Keep it up with the condescending tone. It really suits you.

The same people who keep posting shit like "what makes you think you can decide who's a fan" or "you're not in the band". Seems they have some kind of bug up their asses because I never claimed to speak on behalf of anybody else than myself.



This is the same guy who seems to be upset because he can't get to decide how I run my site.




It makes you look classy when you can't even spell my first name right. It's five letters. Even the Swedes can get it right.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 01:11:53 PM
Quote
t makes you look classy when you can't even spell my first name right. It's five letters. Even the Swedes can get it right.
Im typing it the way its pronounced or atleast the way I heard Axl pronounce it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 01:15:24 PM
Quote
t makes you look classy when you can't even spell my first name right. It's five letters. Even the Swedes can get it right.
Im typing it the way its pronounced or atleast the way I heard Axl pronounce it.


So if Jim Bob pronounces your name as miserable, it's ok for me to call you that?

 ???  :hihi:






/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 01:17:34 PM
Quote
So if Jim Bob pronounces your name as miserable, it's ok for me to call you that?

 
Yes!!! When will you realize that I am not offended by insults on a forum? I only point them out because its a double standard.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 01:21:31 PM
Quote
So if Jim Bob pronounces your name as miserable, it's ok for me to call you that?

 
Yes!!! When will you realize that I am not offended by insults on a forum? I only point them out because its a double standard.

I think you need to be a bit more consistent before I believe that.


Since when do you spell out things like they're pronounced anyway?  ???





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on March 01, 2009, 01:22:35 PM
Even the Swedes can get it right.

only because of the way J is prounouced in Sweden, we wouldn't have any idea otherwise :hihi:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 01:23:20 PM
I just don't see why younggunner feels the need to be a naysayer in every thread that goes past 5 pages.  

Nothing wrong with different opinions or opposing views, but I think some people come here to stir shit just for shits and giggles.    Its like he wants to be the odd man out.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: adman2374 on March 01, 2009, 01:23:37 PM
this yarmo character is pretty brave via the web. i would like to see how he would act in the real fucking world , talking to people face to face! you are not the be it all, end all of gnr fans...not even close.....but you preach and rule this site like you do. well, let me tell you, you are not, big fella. you are a nerd with a computer, nothing more and if someone says something you dont like or agree with, you ban them, harass the, or do not directly respond to their comments/questions. that my friend sounds like a coward to me....


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 01:24:30 PM
Even the Swedes can get it right.

only because of the way J is prounouced in Sweden, we wouldn't have any idea otherwise :hihi:

That's true!  :hihi:


/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on March 01, 2009, 01:33:09 PM
this yarmo character is pretty brave via the web. i would like to see how he would act in the real fucking world , talking to people face to face! you are not the be it all, end all of gnr fans...not even close.....but you preach and rule this site like you do. well, let me tell you, you are not, big fella. you are a nerd with a computer, nothing more and if someone says something you dont like or agree with, you ban them, harass the, or do not directly respond to their comments/questions. that my friend sounds like a coward to me....

Well, no matter what, he probably is more informed than many of us and, afterall, he does run this site so I guess that means he does make the rules. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 01:34:08 PM
Quote
I just don't see why younggunner feels the need to be a naysayer in every thread that goes past 5 pages.  

Nothing wrong with different opinions or opposing views, but I think some people come here to stir shit just for shits and giggles.    Its like he wants to be the odd man out.
If there is nothing wrong with different opinions or opposing views then what is the problem?

I do not come here to start shit for the heck of it. Do I act or conduct myself like some of the "haters" do on mygnr? Do I attack Axl personally(his looks, etc) Do I attack Beta, etc?

I come here as a huge Axl and GNR fan. I come here to talk about that. Its no different than me supporting or ragging on my sports teams. I agree, I disagree....but regardless....I love them :love: :love: johan :nervous:



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 01:37:07 PM
Quote
I just don't see why younggunner feels the need to be a naysayer in every thread that goes past 5 pages.  

Nothing wrong with different opinions or opposing views, but I think some people come here to stir shit just for shits and giggles.    Its like he wants to be the odd man out.
If there is nothing wrong with different opinions or opposing views then what is the problem?

I do not come here to start shit for the heck of it. Do I act or conduct myself like some of the "haters" do on mygnr? Do I attack Axl personally(his looks, etc) Do I attack Beta, etc?



you dwell on the negative.    if you disagree with something, you don't jus say it and move on.. you will spend pages assuming the worst and telling Axl what he needs to do, pointing out everything he does wrong in your eyes.  And he can't win with you, no matter what he says or does.

no you aren't on the level that you see typical on mygnr.    but you seem to like focusing on the stuff that divides us rather than unites us all as GnR fans.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 01:41:16 PM
Quote
you dwell on the negative.    if you disagree with something, you don't jus say it and move on.. you will spend pages assuming the worst and telling Axl what he needs to do.

no you aren't on the level that you see typical on mygnr.    but you seem to like focusing on the stuff that divides us rather than unites us all as GnR fans.
Because in this format when we all say something, others use the quote function and challenge what you just said. Isnt this how this works? I do it, you do it, we all do it.....as a result it turns into a discussion

What are we discussing? the topic.....who brought up the topic? generally Axl

case in point this thread.

Axl gave an interview. He has decided to continue to tell his story about Slash and the old band....As a result people are going to discuss what he said....being that it is such a heated topic its going to get lengthy discussion....

how can you expect fans to unite when Axl is discussing a topic that has the potential and is dividing the fan base?


This is going to sound crazy but I can make the argument that Axl is better off coming here than consulting with the people he consults with. Assuming of course there is no internal debate. Atleast here he can see many different viewpoints before making a decision. If hes only hearing one viewpoint that isnt always the best either....


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 01:43:49 PM
this yarmo character is pretty brave via the web. i would like to see how he would act in the real fucking world , talking to people face to face! you are not the be it all, end all of gnr fans...not even close.....but you preach and rule this site like you do. well, let me tell you, you are not, big fella. you are a nerd with a computer, nothing more and if someone says something you dont like or agree with, you ban them, harass the, or do not directly respond to their comments/questions. that my friend sounds like a coward to me....

Enough with the lies.

People get banned because they insult other posters, start shit, come here with personal agendas etc.

You pretty much qualify for all of the above.

Your obsession with me is special. Some would say creepy.

Steven, how many times did you get banned because of your obsession with me? You can say you don't care about me, but your posts say otherwise.

How many posts of yours in this thread are about the subject and how many are about me? How many of your total posts are aimed at me? How often do you post in a thread, only quoting my post to say that I'm wrong and not really adding anything else to the discussion?

You stalk me around on here replying to as many of my posts as you can pointing out how I know nothing, how I don't speak on behalf of the band, how I don't decide who's a fan etc.

All this from a person who says he doesn't care about me.

I'm glad you care so little about me that you had to run to Younggunner's defense in order to once again attack me.



Yes, it's true, I don't reply to your messages anymore. I admit that.




I'm the coward? Who's the one hiding behind a new user name posting insult after another aimed at me for instant self-gratification?


With that said, I'm not gonna replay to any more of your posts. I hope you get the fucking clue already.

Obviously the fact that I've ignored all your previous messages didn't get the message through.




Now, you can tell yourself that the next time you get yourself banned from here is because I don't agree with you.





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 01:51:43 PM
how can you expect fans to unite when Axl is discussing a topic that has the potential and is dividing the fan base?
most the folks who side with slash have already given up on GNR a long time ago.  Theres no reason that Axl speaking on this now should be causing us to divide.

This is going to sound crazy but I can make the argument that Axl is better off coming here than consulting with the people he consults with. Assuming of course there is no internal debate. Atleast here he can see many different viewpoints before making a decision. If hes only hearing one viewpoint that isnt always the best either....
Thats the thing.. maybe Axl doesn't care what others think?   Especailly if they get all offended that he isn't Slash's biggest fan.  And thats exactly what this is about to the people who are upset by this interview. 

You keep assuming you know whats best for him but you don't know him personally nor do we know his intentions.  Who is he consulting with anyways?  I have no idea how Axl Rose makes his decisions.   All we can say is he's been silent on this issue for the most part while others ran their mouths.   In the last couple months he has been talking more about his side of things.   


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: adman2374 on March 01, 2009, 01:56:23 PM
its just about the facts, man. not about personal agendas, ego trips, etc. but with you, responding the way you do, it seems to many that for you that is all that it is about. if you were a man, you would allow others to disagree with your views. its really that simple. you bring up non sense and circular arguments that go nowhere except to your head. let people speak their minds, even if they do not agree with the high holy one...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 01:58:34 PM
let people speak their minds, even if they do not agree with the high holy one...

i dont think its about not letting people speak their minds.

Its about the reason we are here - suppoting the band as fans.  When you allow 100% unrestricted anything goes, thats when the haters find their way here and then every single thread becomes slash/vr/reunion/blame axl bullshit.   Go look at any other GnR board and you'll see what I'm saying.

Who wants the same tired shit in every thread.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Padmasana on March 01, 2009, 01:59:44 PM
Aside from all the assorted weirdness on this board and in the interview, I guess I just felt sad, more than anything.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 02:03:42 PM
Quote
most the folks who side with slash have already given up on GNR a long time ago.  Theres no reason that Axl speaking on this now should be causing us to divide.
your making my point

Why should Axl dwell on this when he cant win back any substantial public support in the first place?

Quote
Thats the thing.. maybe Axl doesn't care what others think?   Especailly if they get all offended that he isn't Slash's biggest fan.  And thats exactly what this is about to the people who are upset by this interview.  

You keep assuming you know whats best for him but you don't know him personally nor do we know his intentions.  Who is he consulting with anyways?  I have no idea how Axl Rose makes his decisions.   All we can say is he's been silent on this issue for the most part while others ran their mouths.   In the last couple months he has been talking more about his side of things.    

Who is asking Axl to be a Slash fan? Who is asking Axl not to tell his side of the story?  Imo, a lenghty, tell all, comeback interview would have allowed Axl to say what he had to say and then move on. Instead we have 3 interviews in a row that have generated the same headlines.....with more to come

Im not expecting Axl to do anything he doesnt want to do. But that doesnt mean what he does is right either.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 02:08:02 PM
i dont think its about not letting people speak their minds.

Its about the reason we are here - suppoting the band as fans.  When you allow 100% unrestricted anything goes, thats when the haters find their way here and then every single thread becomes slash/vr/reunion/blame axl bullshit.   Go look at any other GnR board and you'll see what I'm saying.

Who wants the same tired shit in every thread.


Explaining that to these people is a lose-lose situation. They just don't want to get it.

It all comes down to "he banned me because I don't agree with him".

No matter how many rules they broke.


They like to point out how Axl takes no responsibility, and when they get banned themselves for breaking our rules, it's all because I don't agree with them.

No matter how many links to copyrighted material they posted, no matter what they called me or any other poster. What happened to taking responsibility?



The concept that they're basically guests in my house does not register.

It seems to piss them off a lot that I can actually tell them that what they're doing won't go here.

I don't know why.

I guess it hurts their ego when a nerd behind a computer tells them to shut the fuck up or they'll get kicked out.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 02:09:38 PM

Im not expecting Axl to do anything he doesnt want to do. But that doesnt mean what he does is right either.


whose to say what is wrong or right?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 02:14:11 PM

Im not expecting Axl to do anything he doesnt want to do. But that doesnt mean what he does is right either.


whose to say what is wrong or right?


Exactly.

What seems right to you, might be wrong for me.



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 02:15:54 PM
Quote
whose to say what is wrong or right?

no one. Its an opinion


Quote
What seems right to you, might be wrong for me.
bingo.




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 02:22:04 PM
Quote
What seems right to you, might be wrong for me.
bingo.


So now you see why I disagree with you.

But still you seem to get "upset" that I reply.

No matter if it's about your complaints regarding GN'R or your definition of the word fan.



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: younggunner on March 01, 2009, 02:29:15 PM
I know why you disagree with me. We have differing opinions on many topics. You reply because you disagree with me. And thats fine. I certainly dont get upset


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 01, 2009, 02:34:09 PM
I hope Axl know how to forgive,

I hope not!
Forgivnes is the drivel of Jesus, having someone die for my deeds isn't something anyone should accept.


Justice and honesty is what matters, it's great to see Axl speaks up and being real at that.

Dark feelings also seems to be a creative force for art.

Aside from all the assorted weirdness on this board and in the interview, I guess I just felt sad, more than anything.

I loved it, haven't had such a rant since...92? :P

The negativety of some people here is damn annoying, I admit it too.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 02:34:29 PM
Quote
whose to say what is wrong or right?

no one. Its an opinion


you seem to think you know whats right for Axl, when you haven't the slightest idea.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: mECHsLAVE on March 01, 2009, 02:42:02 PM
Personally, I think if Axl wants to speak about this stuff, he needs to do a real sit-down, video or phone interview.  Not this email interview stuff, where he clearly thinks his answers out over the course of hours, and edits, etc.   That's horseshit.   If you don't care or don't want to be interviewed, cool.   Then don't.   But I must say the way he's doing these cake interviews and email interviews makes him look a little like he's lost it, is scared of being asked tough questions, scared of answering them, or some other kind of paranoia.   That's never been Guns attitude, and never been Axl's way before.   He's never been one to give a lot of interviews, but he's always sat down and been open and honest before.   The vibe he's sending out with these recent interviews is like he has something to hide, or is scared of how it'll come out.   The flip side is Slash will run and leap in front of any operational camera and spill his guts, which can get old and is why he's seen as a media whore, but I'll take it any day over these take home assignment interviews Axl is doing.  I love Axl, but I don't care for that.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 01, 2009, 02:45:57 PM

They would spin it, not sure Axl wanna promote Slash's name so much publicly :hihi:

And why are some so stuck up the notion that Axl is supposed to be so much better, like above stuff that relates to him?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: DemocracyRose on March 01, 2009, 02:47:06 PM
Personally, I think if Axl wants to speak about this stuff, he needs to do a real sit-down, video or phone interview.  Not this email interview stuff, where he clearly thinks his answers out over the course of hours, and edits, etc.   That's horseshit.   If you don't care or don't want to be interviewed, cool.   Then don't.   But I must say the way he's doing these cake interviews and email interviews makes him look a little like he's lost it, is scared of being asked tough questions, scared of answering them, or some other kind of paranoia.   That's never been Guns attitude, and never been Axl's way before.   He's never been one to give a lot of interviews, but he's always sat down and been open and honest before.   The vibe he's sending out with these recent interviews is like he has something to hide, or is scared of how it'll come out.   The flip side is Slash will run and leap in front of any operational camera and spill his guts, which can get old and is why he's seen as a media whore, but I'll take it any day over these take home assignment interviews Axl is doing.  I love Axl, but I don't care for that.  

Sure he should do a video interview. But this is way better than nothing. :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 01, 2009, 02:57:13 PM
Jarmo, in your life, has Axl Rose ever "rubbed" you the wrong way?  And I don't want to hear, "I love Axl for Axl", or "he just speaks his mind", yada, yada, yada... Have you ever been objective and said, "hmmm, not sure what Axl is trying to say there", or "That doesn't really make sense, I call BS".  I am not challenging your fanhood, just curious if all that Axl does is justifiable because he is "AXL FUCKING ROSE", or do you too find some of his actions questionable.  I know everyone makes mistakes, everyone has bad days.. What mistakes or bad days do you think Axl may have had in YOUR eyes.  Is there a single moment you can mention?

It always comes to this with the Slash fans.... You want me to list Axl's mistakes to prove to yourselves that I'm such a big ass kisser because I won't play your game!

Go ahead, see if I fucking care!


The difference is that, yes he's Axl Rose, but I know that he's a human being just like the rest of us. He happens to be very talented, but still a human being.

That kinda helps one understand things.


If something doesn't make sense to me, I either try to understand it or I know for a fact that it makes no sense to me because I'm not Axl Rose!

Each one of us makes decisions based on what we know, think and how we feel etc. I bet the same goes for Axl.

The only difference is that none of us live the life he lives, so understanding how he makes his decisions isn't as easy. How many of us can relate to the life he lives?

Do you often stand in front of thousands of people while putting everything you got into it? Do you put personal things out there for everybody to analyze and judge? Are you pretty much in charge of an international brand?



In my opinion, pointing fingers and "calling bs" when you don't know the reason(s) makes one look like an ignorant fool.

Some are happy to be that ignorant fool. I try not to be.





/jarmo

In America people love America, but many disliked Geoge Bush, or said he made a mistake here and there.

Why were the American's not all on the same team?  They were.  They want what is best for America, regardless of what George Bush thought.  Many George Bush supports acknowledge he made major blunders. 

Lets look at football.  This year the head coach of my favorite team was fired.  I supported this coach every single day he was there because he was my coach, but he made several mistakes. His biggest mistake was going to a radical offense which lead us to a terrible season.  I still respect that coach and he did a lot of great things for my team, but it was time for him to move on.  I now support the new coach, but I know he too will make mistakes. 

I don't know what Slash has to do with this, but since you brought him up, ya, he makes a lot of mistakes too.  He is sorry for how he acted to Axl when VR first started and had said so and has spoken highly of him lately.  He admitted he was wrong. 

Nice work dancing around the question.  I do agree, you need to know why the person does certain things, but doing this interview did nothing good for Axl, so I don't see how its a positive. 

Axl is still my favorite singer ever and he is a brilliant singer, this is just one interview what he said some classless things.  He has the right, and he is Axl Rose, there is nothing for me to understand, they were rude comments.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 01, 2009, 03:13:43 PM
Personally, I think if Axl wants to speak about this stuff, he needs to do a real sit-down, video or phone interview.  Not this email interview stuff, where he clearly thinks his answers out over the course of hours, and edits, etc.   That's horseshit.   If you don't care or don't want to be interviewed, cool.   Then don't.   But I must say the way he's doing these cake interviews and email interviews makes him look a little like he's lost it, is scared of being asked tough questions, scared of answering them, or some other kind of paranoia.   That's never been Guns attitude, and never been Axl's way before.   He's never been one to give a lot of interviews, but he's always sat down and been open and honest before.   The vibe he's sending out with these recent interviews is like he has something to hide, or is scared of how it'll come out.   The flip side is Slash will run and leap in front of any operational camera and spill his guts, which can get old and is why he's seen as a media whore, but I'll take it any day over these take home assignment interviews Axl is doing.  I love Axl, but I don't care for that.  




Wow another fan who's telling Axl what to do ! man oh man.  What's wrong with a website interview ?  NOTHING ! what would be a the diffrence if it was on TV  ?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 03:18:40 PM
Personally, I think if Axl wants to speak about this stuff, he needs to do a real sit-down, video or phone interview.  Not this email interview stuff, where he clearly thinks his answers out over the course of hours, and edits, etc.   That's horseshit.   If you don't care or don't want to be interviewed, cool.   Then don't.   But I must say the way he's doing these cake interviews and email interviews makes him look a little like he's lost it, is scared of being asked tough questions, scared of answering them, or some other kind of paranoia.   That's never been Guns attitude, and never been Axl's way before.   He's never been one to give a lot of interviews, but he's always sat down and been open and honest before.   The vibe he's sending out with these recent interviews is like he has something to hide, or is scared of how it'll come out.   The flip side is Slash will run and leap in front of any operational camera and spill his guts, which can get old and is why he's seen as a media whore, but I'll take it any day over these take home assignment interviews Axl is doing.  I love Axl, but I don't care for that.  

Sure he should do a video interview. But this is way better than nothing. :)

thats the problem with some of these poeple.    things dont go exactly the way they want it to so they just complain and say Axl is doing things "wrong"

i dont get it

What GnR fan wouldn't love to see a video interview?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: wells on March 01, 2009, 03:20:41 PM
it was a great read and almost everything in this thread after first post with interview is 'cancer' and should be removed...







-velimir


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on March 01, 2009, 03:21:46 PM
I'm getting a kick out of all these grown men crying about stuff that doesn't even relate to them.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 01, 2009, 03:22:15 PM
but doing this interview did nothing good for Axl, so I don't see how its a positive. 

No? A lot of fans here are happy for him sharing. Is he some public whore for you?

It's like right and wrong?
There is really no absolutes, it's great to see Axl speaks up, many here long wanted in his pov in this. ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: mECHsLAVE on March 01, 2009, 03:25:00 PM
Personally, I think if Axl wants to speak about this stuff, he needs to do a real sit-down, video or phone interview.  Not this email interview stuff, where he clearly thinks his answers out over the course of hours, and edits, etc.   That's horseshit.   If you don't care or don't want to be interviewed, cool.   Then don't.   But I must say the way he's doing these cake interviews and email interviews makes him look a little like he's lost it, is scared of being asked tough questions, scared of answering them, or some other kind of paranoia.   That's never been Guns attitude, and never been Axl's way before.   He's never been one to give a lot of interviews, but he's always sat down and been open and honest before.   The vibe he's sending out with these recent interviews is like he has something to hide, or is scared of how it'll come out.   The flip side is Slash will run and leap in front of any operational camera and spill his guts, which can get old and is why he's seen as a media whore, but I'll take it any day over these take home assignment interviews Axl is doing.  I love Axl, but I don't care for that.  




Wow another fan who's telling Axl what to do ! man oh man.  What's wrong with a website interview ?  NOTHING ! what would be a the diffrence if it was on TV  ?

Heh.  Are you being serious?   It's like a live test, or a take home test.  One you have to answer on the spot, just being honest, what comes out of your mouth first.   The other, well you can think about it, write it out, have the last word, edit, go back and think about it again, change your mind, etc.   It's night and day.   You like the polished, edited responses, fine.  I don't, that's all I'm saying.   I'd like to see him sit down and answer things live, either over the phone or on video.   It's just a more personal, honest, spontaneous way to be interviewed.    

But then again, now that I'm thinking about it, that just may not be in Axl anymore, sadly.   I mean, we're talking about a guy who edited a "live" album to the point it sounded ridiculous in parts.  Layered, double track vocals, singing lead and background at the same time, on a "live" album.   Some probably think that's cool, too.   I don't.  Sounded pulled-apart and lame as hell, to me.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 01, 2009, 03:27:20 PM
I'm getting a kick out of all these grown men crying about stuff that doesn't even relate to them.

No kidding, It's like life or death to them, Axl said this... OH NO !!! I don't like it.  Then I hear it cause I say " Axl is right and Slash is wrong" then im labeled as a Axl ass kisser.  Sure its ok for Slash fan's to say whatever, once someone says something good about Axl it's just BS to them.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 03:32:29 PM
Nice work dancing around the question. 

As I said, I won't play your blame game.

Everything you think is a mistake has a reason or reasons.




but doing this interview did nothing good for Axl, so I don't see how its a positive. 

Well I disagree.

Let's assume nothing good came out of it.

But if Axl wanted to get some shit off his chest, and he did, then that alone is a good thing.





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: King Axl on March 01, 2009, 03:51:22 PM
slash wrote nothing but lies and slander about axl in his stupid book.  he went out of his way to make axl look bad, and now he's getting his just desserts.  fuck slash.  fuck him in his lying, black heart.  he is nothing, and the only people who support him any more are only doing so to try and tear down axl and the amazing new music he's made.

I read Slash's book. I don't think he went out of his way to make Axl look bad at all. By comparison, I read an article in Metal Hammer magazine yesterday written by Mick Wall (remember him?). The article was supposed to be about the long making of Chinese Democracy, but half of it made references to Axl's "bizarre" behavior--psychics who told him who in the band was out to stab him in the back, and the so-called "dictatorship" Axl was running that forced out all the remaining members of old GN'R.

Slash has certainly underachieved since leaving Guns, but I don't think he's as vengeful a person as Axl's made him out to be. Just an opinion.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 01, 2009, 03:54:50 PM
I feel bad for Axl can never please anyone.  People were complaining about no promotion or interviews, well he's gone on this message board and others and talked with the fans, plus two internet interviews Q&A and that's still not good enough.  Here he put's out Chinese Democracy and people complain that's its not new material cause half it leaked !  Axl can say all he wants about Slash ! I agree when Axl say's he's a cancer ! most interviews i've seen or read have him hating SCOM, or November Rain.  Those songs made Slash famous ! seems like things didn't go his way, he cry to the public about it.  Anyway's I don't wanna hear anymore negative Axl comments just because he opened up his personal opinion toward Saul Hudson.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GunnerOne 84 on March 01, 2009, 04:00:34 PM
I feel bad for Axl can never please anyone.  People were complaining about no promotion or interviews, well he's gone on this message board and others and talked with the fans, plus two internet interviews Q&A and that's still not good enough.  Here he put's out Chinese Democracy and people complain that's its not new material cause half it leaked !  Axl can say all he wants about Slash ! I agree when Axl say's he's a cancer ! most interviews i've seen or read have him hating SCOM, or November Rain.  Those songs made Slash famous ! seems like things didn't go his way, he cry to the public about it.  Anyway's I don't wanna hear anymore negative Axl comments just because he opened up his personal opinion toward Saul Hudson.

You what the problem is? Everyone wanted Axl to really spill about this stuff, I've read so many things over the years about Axl won't talk, blah blah. Then he sits down, and let's us all know exactly how he feels about Slash. But because what he said isn't what everyone wants to hear, they cry and bitch about it. They thought the heavens would part and Axl would profess his undying respect for Slash and the door to a reunion would be opened. Well guess what? It won't happen. You wanted Axl to speak, and he did. Just because he didn't give people what they wanted, everyone's all pissy now.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Buddha_Master on March 01, 2009, 04:05:54 PM
I feel bad for Axl can never please anyone.  People were complaining about no promotion or interviews, well he's gone on this message board and others and talked with the fans, plus two internet interviews Q&A and that's still not good enough.  Here he put's out Chinese Democracy and people complain that's its not new material cause half it leaked !  Axl can say all he wants about Slash ! I agree when Axl say's he's a cancer ! most interviews i've seen or read have him hating SCOM, or November Rain.  Those songs made Slash famous ! seems like things didn't go his way, he cry to the public about it.  Anyway's I don't wanna hear anymore negative Axl comments just because he opened up his personal opinion toward Saul Hudson.

You what the problem is? Everyone wanted Axl to really spill about this stuff, I've read so many things over the years about Axl won't talk, blah blah. Then he sits down, and let's us all know exactly how he feels about Slash. But because what he said isn't what everyone wants to hear, they cry and bitch about it. They thought the heavens would part and Axl would profess his undying respect for Slash and the door to a reunion would be opened. Well guess what? It won't happen. You wanted Axl to speak, and he did. Just because he didn't give people what they wanted, everyone's all pissy now.



Very true. I guess they had to find out for themselves.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 01, 2009, 05:57:47 PM
Wouldn't you make more money?

If the music was there, meaning new music, I can't say for sure right now -- and there have been market surveys, and various promoters have put together different projections and analysis that in areas where there could be more, it's not enough to sell your soul and live in hell the rest of your life for, that's definitely certain. But that's the catch, right, the music? If I believed in that as a reality which, no offense meant to anyone, I haven't seen anything in all these years to convince me or we'd be doing this interview under different circumstances of some sort, to say the least.

It's not some place I want to be or have any interest in being. If I believed in it in regard to the music, not in direction so much but in how it feels and to what degree, then maybe it'd be another story.
I'm in no way trying to be offensive to anyone here, and I'm allowed to have my own feelings in regard to what inspires me, not someone else. Other than a one-off or something, I don't really do songs because someone else likes them.


I want to discuss what is in bold here that Axl said as regards to a reunion tour sort of thing.

I can't really understand exactly what he is saying but it sounds to me like, if the music was great, he'd consider it or am I totally reading this wrong?

It is almost cryptic in parts so if someone can help me interpret this, please do so


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 01, 2009, 06:02:40 PM
Wouldn't you make more money?

If the music was there, meaning new music, I can't say for sure right now -- and there have been market surveys, and various promoters have put together different projections and analysis that in areas where there could be more, it's not enough to sell your soul and live in hell the rest of your life for, that's definitely certain. But that's the catch, right, the music? If I believed in that as a reality which, no offense meant to anyone, I haven't seen anything in all these years to convince me or we'd be doing this interview under different circumstances of some sort, to say the least.

It's not some place I want to be or have any interest in being. If I believed in it in regard to the music, not in direction so much but in how it feels and to what degree, then maybe it'd be another story.
I'm in no way trying to be offensive to anyone here, and I'm allowed to have my own feelings in regard to what inspires me, not someone else. Other than a one-off or something, I don't really do songs because someone else likes them.


I want to discuss what is in bold here that Axl said as regards to a reunion tour sort of thing.

I can't really understand exactly what he is saying but it sounds to me like, if the music was great, he'd consider it or am I totally reading this wrong?

It is almost cryptic in parts so if someone can help me interpret this, please do so


What I got from it is that he would consider it if he really felt the music was right. But for nothing else,


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 06:05:26 PM
he is saying its not something he ever wants to do and that he is less than anxious considering the material released by some of the former alumni.

he says slash is a cancer, and that he has no desire to do anything with more than one of any of the other former members at a time.   

there is nothing about a reunion tour in that D, nothing at all.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 01, 2009, 06:08:13 PM
he is saying its not something he ever wants to do and that he is less than anxious considering the material released by some of the former alumni.

he says slash is a cancer, and that he has no desire to do anything with more than one of any of the other former members at a time.   

there is nothing about a reunion tour in that D, nothing at all.


Yeah but this is in the section of the interview where Del is asking about a reunion and wouldn't he make more money. That last part just totally throws me as I can't quite comprehend what it is he is saying.

The whole, we would be having this interview under different circumstances thing.

its like he doesn't want to, but if the music was right and he felt it, he possibly would.

Maybe I am completely misinterpreting that


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 01, 2009, 06:11:00 PM
Yeah but this is in the section of the interview where Del is asking about a reunion and wouldn't he make more money. That last part just totally throws me as I can't quite comprehend what it is he is saying.

The whole, we would be having this interview under different circumstances thing.

its like he doesn't want to, but if the music was right and he felt it, he possibly would.

Maybe I am completely misinterpreting that


Maybe it's that IF he had seen some music that he could actually get into during all these years, he wouldn't be in the position he is today?

But since he hasn't seen anything in all those years, his position is a firm no.



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 01, 2009, 06:51:24 PM
Yeah but this is in the section of the interview where Del is asking about a reunion and wouldn't he make more money. That last part just totally throws me as I can't quite comprehend what it is he is saying.

The whole, we would be having this interview under different circumstances thing.

its like he doesn't want to, but if the music was right and he felt it, he possibly would.

Maybe I am completely misinterpreting that


Maybe it's that IF he had seen some music that he could actually get into during all these years, he wouldn't be in the position he is today?

But since he hasn't seen anything in all those years, his position is a firm no.



/jarmo

I think he left the door open here.  "If" Slash and Duff, Izzy, etc, had some music that was worth the bullshit in Axl's eye, he would reunite for the MUSIC and the MUSIC only, weather or not he likes Slash and Duff.  So if Slash turned in a song like Coma to Axl today, and he was blown away like he was then, I think he would work on it. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 01, 2009, 07:24:36 PM
I feel bad for Axl can never please anyone.  People were complaining about no promotion or interviews, well he's gone on this message board and others and talked with the fans, plus two internet interviews Q&A and that's still not good enough.  Here he put's out Chinese Democracy and people complain that's its not new material cause half it leaked !  Axl can say all he wants about Slash ! I agree when Axl say's he's a cancer ! most interviews i've seen or read have him hating SCOM, or November Rain.  Those songs made Slash famous ! seems like things didn't go his way, he cry to the public about it.  Anyway's I don't wanna hear anymore negative Axl comments just because he opened up his personal opinion toward Saul Hudson.

You what the problem is? Everyone wanted Axl to really spill about this stuff, I've read so many things over the years about Axl won't talk, blah blah. Then he sits down, and let's us all know exactly how he feels about Slash. But because what he said isn't what everyone wants to hear, they cry and bitch about it. They thought the heavens would part and Axl would profess his undying respect for Slash and the door to a reunion would be opened. Well guess what? It won't happen. You wanted Axl to speak, and he did. Just because he didn't give people what they wanted, everyone's all pissy now.



Very true. I guess they had to find out for themselves.
I agree and I am proud to be on Team Axl!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on March 01, 2009, 07:32:48 PM
I think he left the door open here.  "If" Slash and Duff, Izzy, etc, had some music that was worth the bullshit in Axl's eye, he would reunite for the MUSIC and the MUSIC only, weather or not he likes Slash and Duff.  So if Slash turned in a song like Coma to Axl today, and he was blown away like he was then, I think he would work on it. 

OY FUCKIN VEY!!!  GO READ THE BILLBOARD Q&A!!!  Axl said one of them will die before there's a reunion!!!

maybe Axl was having a bad day

maybe Axl is just sick and tired of all those GNR "fans" that won't accept that there will NEVER be a reunion

maybe Axl hopes that if he says straight out, plain and simple, that "one will die before a reunion would happen" and "he's a cancer" that people will FINALLY STOP spinning that into somehow he's leaving the door open


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: draguns on March 01, 2009, 07:40:40 PM
I do want to bring one thing up in this fiasco. I just hope that when Guns are inducted into the Rock N' Roll Hall of Fame in 2012, it doesn't become a Van Halan or Clearance Clearwater type  of drama. It would be extremely disappointing. Hopefully, these issues will be resolved by that time.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 01, 2009, 07:45:32 PM
I would imagine Axl probably wouldn't show up cause you know Duff,Slash and Adler will definitely show up. Izzy is anybody's guess.

Would be possible i guess for Slash,Duff,Steven to do a song with maybe Chester Bennington or something and maybe Axl perform but I can't really see Axl going for that.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 08:09:41 PM
I think he left the door open here.  "If" Slash and Duff, Izzy, etc, had some music that was worth the bullshit in Axl's eye, he would reunite for the MUSIC and the MUSIC only, weather or not he likes Slash and Duff.  So if Slash turned in a song like Coma to Axl today, and he was blown away like he was then, I think he would work on it. 

OY FUCKIN VEY!!!  GO READ THE BILLBOARD Q&A!!!  Axl said one of them will die before there's a reunion!!!


I can't believe how naive these slash fans are.   Looking for that one glimour of hope when reality is right there hitting them in the face.

I do want to bring one thing up in this fiasco. I just hope that when Guns are inducted into the Rock N' Roll Hall of Fame in 2012, it doesn't become a Van Halan or Clearance Clearwater type  of drama. It would be extremely disappointing. Hopefully, these issues will be resolved by that time.
Axl can bring Guns N' Roses to the hall of fame.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 01, 2009, 08:18:26 PM
what glimmer of hope?

I am just pointing out what he said

one minute he is saying one of them would die first, then he is saying if the music was great enough and now he is saying Slash is a cancer and better removed.................. SO what is he talking about?

A reunion with everybody but Slash? no reunion at all?

They way he writes is very confusing in parts.

Also Jim Bob, Axl isn't the one that determines who makes the hall of fame. They go by who in their opinion made the band what it is and I guarantee the old lineup will be in the Hall of fame. to debate that is just laughable.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 01, 2009, 08:22:40 PM
what glimmer of hope?

I am just pointing out what he said

one minute he is saying one of them would die first, then he is saying if the music was great enough and now he is saying Slash is a cancer and better removed.................. SO what is he talking about?

A reunion with everybody but Slash? no reunion at all?
was, as in past tense.  no reunion at all

no more than one alumni involved in a project at a time.   Izzy might show up at a show.   he'd be open to having Duff make an appearance.  Thats it.   Its pretty clear



Also Jim Bob, Axl isn't the one that determines who makes the hall of fame. They go by who in their opinion made the band what it is and I guarantee the old lineup will be in the Hall of fame. to debate that is just laughable.

i'm not debating who gets inducted.  but theres no reason he can't bring GnR on the day GnR is inducted.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 01, 2009, 08:25:24 PM
what glimmer of hope?

I am just pointing out what he said

one minute he is saying one of them would die first, then he is saying if the music was great enough and now he is saying Slash is a cancer and better removed.................. SO what is he talking about?

A reunion with everybody but Slash? no reunion at all?

They way he writes is very confusing in parts.

Also Jim Bob, Axl isn't the one that determines who makes the hall of fame. They go by who in their opinion made the band what it is and I guarantee the old lineup will be in the Hall of fame. to debate that is just laughable.

Axl owns the name to GnR !  so how can the former members show up ?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 01, 2009, 08:37:59 PM
It isn't about who owns a name. Its about which artists created the music.

Axl is of course definite
Slash of course
Izzy of course
Duff  of course

Steven  maybe..... that will be one of those questionable ones although he does get co writing credits on all of Appetite.
Dizzy  maybe
Matt...... Doubtful as he had no songwriting credits

The new guys are debatable also because it depends on how they view their contributions.

Paul Huge is possible since he had some writing credits on the early stuff and CD



I say Slash,Duff,Steven do a song with a singer

Then Axl and his band do a song

but, would axl go for the other guys doing a song on the same night?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Neemo on March 01, 2009, 08:49:45 PM
I say Slash,Duff,Steven do a song with a singer

Then Axl and his band do a song

but, would axl go for the other guys doing a song on the same night?

I think its more about who the ROFHOF invites to perform  ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on March 01, 2009, 08:55:23 PM
Quote from: Axl?s Billboard Q&A
In regards to Slash, I read a desperate fan's message about, what if one of us were to die and looking back I had the possibility of a reunion now, blah blah blah. And my thoughts are, "Yeah, and while you're at the show your baby accidentally kicks a candle and burns your house down, killing himself and the rest of your family."

Give me a fucking break. What's clear is that one of the two of us will die before a reunion and however sad, ugly or unfortunate anyone views it, it is how it is. Those decisions were made a long time ago and reiterated year after year by one man.

I think that pretty much says Axl isn?t interested in performing with Slash at the RnR HOF or anywhere else for that matter.  ::)



This thread was starting to read like Del interviewed Jarmo. :hihi:

Your obsession with me is special. Some would say creepy.

Steven, how many times did you get banned because of your obsession with me? You can say you don't care about me, but your posts say otherwise.

How many posts of yours in this thread are about the subject and how many are about me? How many of your total posts are aimed at me? How often do you post in a thread, only quoting my post to say that I'm wrong and not really adding anything else to the discussion?


Yes, it's true, I don't reply to your messages anymore. I admit that.

With that said, I'm not gonna replay to any more of your posts. I hope you get the fucking clue already.

Obviously the fact that I've ignored all your previous messages didn't get the message through.


/jarmo

its just about the facts, man. not about personal agendas, ego trips, etc. but with you, responding the way you do, it seems to many that for you that is all that it is about. if you were a man, you would allow others to disagree with your views. its really that simple. you bring up non sense and circular arguments that go nowhere except to your head. let people speak their minds, even if they do not agree with the high holy one...

Yeah, Jarmo.  It?s NOT about personal agendas, ego trips, etc.  I think maybe you?re just paranoid. :no:
adman2374 ONLY quoted and attacked you personally in 73 of his 179* posts.  (I couldn?t tell how many of the other 106 of his posts replied to something you posted because he didn?t quote you in those.)


*179 posts for this username only, not the others he?s used in the past


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 01, 2009, 08:58:41 PM
A lot can happen in 3 years though.

So we will see once the HOF gets here.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 01, 2009, 09:01:57 PM
what glimmer of hope?

I am just pointing out what he said

one minute he is saying one of them would die first, then he is saying if the music was great enough and now he is saying Slash is a cancer and better removed.................. SO what is he talking about?

A reunion with everybody but Slash? no reunion at all?

They way he writes is very confusing in parts.

Also Jim Bob, Axl isn't the one that determines who makes the hall of fame. They go by who in their opinion made the band what it is and I guarantee the old lineup will be in the Hall of fame. to debate that is just laughable.

Axl owns the name to GnR !  so how can the former members show up ?

That makes no difference at all! Requirements for the Hall of Fame are that you are not eligible till 25 years after their first release and the induct is for the people involved in that album and whoever they choose to invite (If approved by the commitee). It would make no sense if Axl was there just with the new lineup and lets face it he would get yet more critics for it. The others will turn up, Axl has already said he doesn't care much for it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GypsySoul on March 01, 2009, 09:03:53 PM
A lot can happen in 3 years though.

So we will see once the HOF gets here.

Apparently Axl's felt this way for the past 13 years.

I kinda doubt he's gonna feel differently in the next 3.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AdZ on March 01, 2009, 09:20:03 PM
Who really gives a fuck about the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame anyway?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 01, 2009, 09:38:04 PM
Who really gives a fuck about the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame anyway?

Majority of artist don't really think its much of a milestone so they don't go.  I bet Axl doesn't even show up when the times comes, won't bring me to tears as some other people.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: The Dog on March 01, 2009, 11:42:23 PM
Who really gives a fuck about the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame anyway?

Seriously.  It's such a joke.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on March 02, 2009, 12:14:29 AM
Who really gives a fuck about the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame anyway?

Madonna fans?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 02, 2009, 12:20:11 AM
Quote from: Axl?s Billboard Q&A
In regards to Slash, I read a desperate fan's message about, what if one of us were to die and looking back I had the possibility of a reunion now, blah blah blah. And my thoughts are, "Yeah, and while you're at the show your baby accidentally kicks a candle and burns your house down, killing himself and the rest of your family."

Give me a fucking break. What's clear is that one of the two of us will die before a reunion and however sad, ugly or unfortunate anyone views it, it is how it is. Those decisions were made a long time ago and reiterated year after year by one man.

I think that pretty much says Axl isn?t interested in performing with Slash at the RnR HOF or anywhere else for that matter.  ::)



This thread was starting to read like Del interviewed Jarmo. :hihi:

Your obsession with me is special. Some would say creepy.

Steven, how many times did you get banned because of your obsession with me? You can say you don't care about me, but your posts say otherwise.

How many posts of yours in this thread are about the subject and how many are about me? How many of your total posts are aimed at me? How often do you post in a thread, only quoting my post to say that I'm wrong and not really adding anything else to the discussion?


Yes, it's true, I don't reply to your messages anymore. I admit that.

With that said, I'm not gonna replay to any more of your posts. I hope you get the fucking clue already.

Obviously the fact that I've ignored all your previous messages didn't get the message through.


/jarmo

its just about the facts, man. not about personal agendas, ego trips, etc. but with you, responding the way you do, it seems to many that for you that is all that it is about. if you were a man, you would allow others to disagree with your views. its really that simple. you bring up non sense and circular arguments that go nowhere except to your head. let people speak their minds, even if they do not agree with the high holy one...

Yeah, Jarmo.  It?s NOT about personal agendas, ego trips, etc.  I think maybe you?re just paranoid. :no:
adman2374 ONLY quoted and attacked you personally in 73 of his 179* posts.  (I couldn?t tell how many of the other 106 of his posts replied to something you posted because he didn?t quote you in those.)


*179 posts for this username only, not the others he?s used in the past


I am the one that posed the question about one of them dying and I kind of feel honored it got to him to atleast think about it, eventhough it wasn't the answer I expected from a 46 year old, at least it was an answer.  I think he was clear about Slash, but, if the music WAS that good, I think he would change his mind. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 12:28:44 AM
^ slash fans are so naive.  :rofl:

  • slash or I will die before theres a reunion
  • slash is a cancer and the less we hear from him or his supporters the better
  • no collaboration with more than one ex-member at a time

lets go back to 2002, Axl wasn't lying when he said this.
"For the fans to attempt to condemn me to relationships even only professional with any of these men is a prison sentence and something I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. I'd say my parole is nearly over. I'm practically a free man and if you don't like it you'll have plenty of time to get used to the idea."

And yet here is Smoking Guns still coming to GnR boards saying a reunion of the classic lineup is possible.  :rofl:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 02, 2009, 12:31:23 AM
^ slash fans are so naive.  :rofl:

  • slash or I will die before theres a reunion
  • slash is a cancer and the less we hear from him or his supporters the better
  • no collaboration with more than one ex-member at a time

lets go back to 2002, Axl wasn't lying when he said this.
"For the fans to attempt to condemn me to relationships even only professional with any of these men is a prison sentence and something I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. I'd say my parole is nearly over. I'm practically a free man and if you don't like it you'll have plenty of time to get used to the idea."

And yet here is Smoking Guns still coming to GnR boards saying a reunion of the classic lineup is possible.  :rofl:

I would say 99% of never happening..... But, until one dies, its not 100%.  I don't want one anyway, its obvious Axl hates Slash and just because the other exmembers love Slash, its not 100% and if you can't make your singer happy, the band is always doomed. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 12:34:38 AM


I would say 99% of never happening..... But, until one dies, its not 100%.  I don't want one anyway, its obvious Axl hates Slash and just because the other exmembers love Slash, its not 100% and if you can't make your singer happy, the band is always doomed

especially when the singer owns the name of said band and holds the keys. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: NicoRourke on March 02, 2009, 02:18:42 AM
A lot can happen in 3 years though.

So we will see once the HOF gets here.

You should stop fueling some people's hopes (delusions) with all your shit ...

Don't you understand the words of Axl ? Isn't what he said 100% crystal clear ?

 ::)

Long live GN'R !


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GunnerOne 84 on March 02, 2009, 02:37:02 AM
A lot can happen in 3 years though.

So we will see once the HOF gets here.

You should stop fueling some people's hopes (delusions) with all your shit ...

Don't you understand the words of Axl ? Isn't what he said 100% crystal clear ?

 ::)

Long live GN'R !

People will believe what they want to believe, despite all evidence to the contrary.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 02:37:23 AM
A lot can happen in 3 years though.

So we will see once the HOF gets here.

You should stop fueling some people's hopes (delusions) with all your shit ...

Don't you understand the words of Axl ? Isn't what he said 100% crystal clear ?

 ::)

Long live GN'R !

well if nothing else, hopefully these kinds of delusions will become less and less.

I believed Axl the first time he said it in 2002..  and have always considered these reunion guys to be living in some sort of fantasy land.       Its now been made very very clear, and most of these reunion types will either have to accept the facts or move on.

then we can look forward to seeing some more interviews about the current guys and the current songs.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on March 02, 2009, 02:43:18 AM
He even said some of those things in his famous Serpico speech.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Genesis on March 02, 2009, 03:30:33 AM
Nice Interview. This is one interview where I thought the interviewer asked exactly the right questions, especially regarding Finck and Brain.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: greekmule on March 02, 2009, 04:31:50 AM
Well, for me, i don't really get it how neither Axl nor Slash seem to take responsibility for their actions. Slash is too busy trying to be portrayed as the victim and nice guy, while axl just loves to give hell to everyone and say how he never did anything wrong and everyone was just out to get him, which may be true regarding some aspects, but in others he just sounds like a mad man ranting in the rain. and i'm just calling it as i see it.

I don't really trust one or another. first of all because everyone lies to save their ass, and it amuses me to see how some people in here just takes sides based on what either slash or axl recollects from the breaking of the band or their continued battles. it's just non sense. To put aside rational thinking and trusting someone else's version of events is just silly and makes me laugh or think you guys are "cucu" and are taking this a little too far.

the way i see it, axl came off harsh, because, if i read correctly he tried to bring slash down on his playing, and slash may be a lot of things, but he's a damn guitar legend for sure. you can't take anything from him, even if you don't appreciate his last projects. because, all things considered, the same thing could be told about axl, a lot of people hate him for his change in musical style, however i still see him for what he is, a great performer, even with all his faults.

i find it ridiculous that many can't really see the difference between liking the music and liking the musician himself. i love gn'r, old and current version, but i don't really know them, the only three people that seem, from interview,s i could be friends with are duff, bumble and Robin, and that's just based on how they come off, but that's just a big assumption on my part and i take it for what it is. All the others i can't really tell. but i don't make an effort to try to take sides or like someone else's view on the world or people. We are music fans, we like the music. these things are the ugly part of music.

i loved reading Axl's take on all of it, and it's his side and it's a valid point of view. but at the end of the day, i couldn't care less. i like the current gn'r and i like the music and that's all that matters.

if  i could or should make a remark about his interview, i'd only ask him to spend more time talking about his current band members, the process of recording, how they get along, how it's like to share the studio with them and letting them do interviews as well, because the past is buried and it's gonna be that way, but the current incarnation of GN'R needs more press and attention. they don't even have a video for god's sake.

But i do get why this is so important for axl, he did keep himself quite for so many years, it's his turn to speak.

but let's not forget, for anyone to try to really say what happened between Axl and Slash and who's wrong or Right, is just crazy. it strictly depends on who you believe, but given the fact that they're both trying to save their asses in the press, i 'm not gonna take any sides cuz none of this is objective, nor relevant.


the cool part of the interview for me was Robin has an interest to tour with them and he has a solo that sounds like SRV, now that's something i like to hear.

hopefully we'll see them tour this summer and many of us htgth members will meet again and enjoy the great time it was back in 2006 in europe.

Cheers

best post of this thread, I agree with the vast majority of what you say. : ok:



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 02, 2009, 04:45:30 AM
That last part just totally throws me as I can't quite comprehend what it is he is saying.

He is asked about money, so obviously it would be limitation to his freedom of talking due to contracts.

Once someone put their money into you, partnerships, you got obligations and diverse intrests.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: MeanBone on March 02, 2009, 05:14:35 AM
Well, for me, i don't really get it how neither Axl nor Slash seem to take responsibility for their actions. Slash is too busy trying to be portrayed as the victim and nice guy, while axl just loves to give hell to everyone and say how he never did anything wrong and everyone was just out to get him, which may be true regarding some aspects, but in others he just sounds like a mad man ranting in the rain. and i'm just calling it as i see it.

I don't really trust one or another. first of all because everyone lies to save their ass, and it amuses me to see how some people in here just takes sides based on what either slash or axl recollects from the breaking of the band or their continued battles. it's just non sense. To put aside rational thinking and trusting someone else's version of events is just silly and makes me laugh or think you guys are "cucu" and are taking this a little too far.

the way i see it, axl came off harsh, because, if i read correctly he tried to bring slash down on his playing, and slash may be a lot of things, but he's a damn guitar legend for sure. you can't take anything from him, even if you don't appreciate his last projects. because, all things considered, the same thing could be told about axl, a lot of people hate him for his change in musical style, however i still see him for what he is, a great performer, even with all his faults.

i find it ridiculous that many can't really see the difference between liking the music and liking the musician himself. i love gn'r, old and current version, but i don't really know them, the only three people that seem, from interview,s i could be friends with are duff, bumble and Robin, and that's just based on how they come off, but that's just a big assumption on my part and i take it for what it is. All the others i can't really tell. but i don't make an effort to try to take sides or like someone else's view on the world or people. We are music fans, we like the music. these things are the ugly part of music.

i loved reading Axl's take on all of it, and it's his side and it's a valid point of view. but at the end of the day, i couldn't care less. i like the current gn'r and i like the music and that's all that matters.

if  i could or should make a remark about his interview, i'd only ask him to spend more time talking about his current band members, the process of recording, how they get along, how it's like to share the studio with them and letting them do interviews as well, because the past is buried and it's gonna be that way, but the current incarnation of GN'R needs more press and attention. they don't even have a video for god's sake.

But i do get why this is so important for axl, he did keep himself quite for so many years, it's his turn to speak.

but let's not forget, for anyone to try to really say what happened between Axl and Slash and who's wrong or Right, is just crazy. it strictly depends on who you believe, but given the fact that they're both trying to save their asses in the press, i 'm not gonna take any sides cuz none of this is objective, nor relevant.


the cool part of the interview for me was Robin has an interest to tour with them and he has a solo that sounds like SRV, now that's something i like to hear.

hopefully we'll see them tour this summer and many of us htgth members will meet again and enjoy the great time it was back in 2006 in europe.

Cheers

best post of this thread, I agree with the vast majority of what you say. : ok:



thanks  : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: coolman78SLASH on March 02, 2009, 05:59:15 AM
So let me get this straight:
If Axl dont like the drums of Matt, why did he release ithe albums? Maybe he changed his mind later, but still...?? You should stand by your decisions regardless.

If he dident like Slash as a guitarist why did he work with him for 11 years? And why thank him for killer guitar work?
And I am kind of dissapointed that he have used almost every interview to bash on Slash, and a little bit on mostly all former members insted of promoting the new band more, and the new music.

Its a bit funny that a LOT of people in here have jumped on Slash/former members when they mentions Axls name, (even if it is mostly the reporters asking questions, and I can understand that reporters also will ask Axl about Slash, just like they ask Slash about Axl, but here he choose his long time friend to do the interview, maybe because he trusts Del but also to try controling the questions in the directions Axl wanted, right? So this time Axl himself wanted to talk mostly about Slash.. I dont mind it so much, but both Axl and Slash kind of scamed the whole fanbase during all the years they played together, selling themselves as a team, a band, a group of friends like a gang, when they for the most part hated and fucked eachothers all the time...

Also: The only one in the whole fucking industry saying a lot of nagative stuff consistantly over and over againg about Slash is Axl, but a bunch of people from the industry, former partners, friends, wives, girlfriends, bandmates, producers, managers, tour staff and so on have said shit about Axl, so maybe it is something wrong with him? I dont know anything more than what I read and hear, but the general picture is as I described.

For me, Im slowly loosing more and more respect for the whole GnR shit right now, because its a soap opera, and as far as I have comprehended, They all talk shit, just with different wrapings.

I love 90% of everything released under the GnR name, I love 60-70% of anything released by Slash,Duff,Izzy, Gilby after GnR, and 50-60% of Velvet Revolver, so I have to hand them this: They have given me a lot of wonderfull music, and I will still enjoy that, but as a fan of them as induvidals, Im struggeling to keep the respect.

Many of us grew up with this band, and supported them anyway possible during a lot of years, but I guess it was based on a illusion (no pun intended).


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 06:04:12 AM
Smoking Guns, would be nice to see you replying to my post regarding Robin, but anyways... Your (and D's) nonsense about a hope for a reunion despite what Axl already said IMHO is just to stir shit up. You guys can't be serious when saying all this shit. If you want to push people into this kind of bullshit just for fun (as I think you're trying to do), I think you're both in serious trouble.

So let me get this straight:
If Axl dont like the drums of Matt, why did he release ithe albums? Maybe he changed his mind later, but still...?? You should stand by your decisions regardless.

If he dident like Slash as a guitarist why did he work with him for 11 years? And why thank him for killer guitar work?
Talk about twisting things up.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 10:35:04 AM
Quote
The 'negative' media has portrayed CD as a flop - despite 2.6 mil sold, almost unpromoted - besides 'fuck you' what do you have to say to them? 


Ok, i know this is slightly off topic but isnt the name "Guns N Roses" enough promotion!  what else does he need!  Its also his own fault if he chooses not to promote his own album.  Its always the same with Axl!  Ranting about how slash and Izzy were trying to take over the band, ranting about record labels etc etc etc.  Guns n Roses nowadays, is Axl, cos thats how Axl always wanted it!  And now that he has it, he isn't exactly setting the world on fire.  What could have possibly taking 15 years to make an average album?  Why no video or tour?  Who is even in the band!? 

I for one have totally lost interest in this mess while I sat back and watched VR form, release 2 albums, tour the world and break up.  They'll probably have a new singer, album and world tour before Axl starts touring.

peace out! :)

It's far from an average album.
yeah it must be axl's fault that cd was the third best selling rock album worldwide in 2008.

so by saying you've totally lost interest, you admit that you post here only to bash them.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 10:50:29 AM
Quote
It's far from an average album.
yeah it must be axl's fault that cd was the third best selling rock album worldwide in 2008.

so by saying you've totally lost interest, you admit that you post here only to bash them.


I have every right to post my opinions.  Im a classic GNR line up fan and Im a fan of Slash.  Axl bashing Slash was outta line so I thought id put the facts out there.  CD is an average album in my opinion and im allowed to have that opinion.  How many good rock albums was there in 2008?  not many.  The old GNR were the biggest band in the world when there were  many other big bands around.  Now, they are 3rd despite a pathetic metallica still going on.

Also, my last comment was removed from this thread, censored if you will.  This thread is being edited in favour of Axl fan's.  simple as!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 10:58:46 AM
in favour of gnr fans. this is a gnr fan board, I'm afraid.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:05:35 AM
And Slash is a huge part of GNR!  And I love Guns n Roses too (Old line up).  But whats the fun in having a discussion if everyone agrees with everyone???  I have my own opinions that i can see have clearly being edited.  Jim Bob can say what he wants about anything and get away with it.  It doesn't make sense!  Somebody also made a comment about Jim Bobs extreme views and that also got deleted. 

Why bother debating?  Axl is God and 100% right and CD is a masterpiece! 

PS: thats what you call sarcasm!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 11:09:03 AM
^ Slash WAS a huge part. Get over it.

IMO, the fun is to have a discussion where I can find another GNR fan, not some people stucked in the past who tries way too hard to bring down the current band.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:12:27 AM
well, he hasn't exactly being replaced has he.  unless its by mediocrity.   Any GNR fan is allowed to discuss issue's here.  We're all entitled to our own opinions, even if that doesn't suit you. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 11:13:36 AM
Talk about being mediocre. You call it opinion, I call it spreading shit all over the thread.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 11:14:16 AM
well, he hasn't exactly being replaced has he.  unless its by mediocrity.   Any GNR fan is allowed to discuss issue's here.  We're all entitled to our own opinions, even if that doesn't suit you. 

You aren't a GnR fan.    You are a fan of what it used to be and a slash fan :nervous: Perhaps you should fuck off and find another site.  I don't wish to read any more of your garbage.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:15:27 AM
well, if you've read the entire thread, i wouldn't be the only one spreading shit, if thats what you call it.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:19:14 AM
Quote
You aren't a GnR fan.    You are a fan of what it used to be and a slash fan  Perhaps you should fuck off and find another site.  I don't wish to read any more of your garbage.


And your an Axl fan posting constant garbage about Slash! 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: loretian on March 02, 2009, 11:20:45 AM
The only reason anyone should be spending any time on a forum posting about a rock band is because they actually like the rock band.  If you don't like what it is, don't post on a freaking forum about it!  It's actually quite possible to live your life without being involved with the minute details of a band.  If the band currently consists of someone you don't like, or attitudes you don't approve of, then get the hell over it and find something else to waste your life on!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 11:21:43 AM
yeah!!! like wasting your time tell other what to do.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 11:22:34 AM
and I'm presently a fan of GNR that are on cd.

well, if you've read the entire thread, i wouldn't be the only one spreading shit, if thats what you call it.
you mean people like smoking guns, d and so forth?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: loretian on March 02, 2009, 11:22:52 AM
yeah!!! like wasting your time tell other what to do.

.....and?  Anything else?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layflats on March 02, 2009, 11:26:36 AM
I wonder what the respective IQs of Slash and Axl are?  Who has the longer penis?  Who could win in arm wrestling?

As far as pure guitar talent, Slash isn't a hack, but certainly not groundbreaking.  In trying to put out something more unique, I think Axl found two of the unsung heroes in modern day guitar with Bucket and Finck and brought them even more to light.  Fincks contributions with NIN stands alone, and Bucket has a ton of material that the majority of music listeners have not heard.

Slash was a throwback to the ol' gunslingers ie. Joe Perry and Jimmy Page, but he never rose to that level of talent, esp. as a songwriter. You can only ride the pentatonic scale for so long. He flamed out with UYI. TOO MUCH HEROIN.  Had a cool look though.





Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:36:07 AM
Quote
you mean people like smoking guns, d and so forth?


D and smoking guns had valid points.

Errr, try Jim Bob.

If I tried to post this thread in the VR section, it would get removed as its already posted here.  So i have to post here.  The fact that my opinion doesn't suit you guys, isn't my issue.  I wouldnt have posted in the first place only for the thread was full of slash bashing.  So i gave my opinion straight out.

deal with it!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Uber-Tech on March 02, 2009, 11:38:02 AM
it seems some fans have found wiggle room - once again (surprise!) - with the "if the music was right" comment.

Given some peoples' point of view on reunions, they'd find room to wiggle in a sardine tin.

^ Slash WAS a huge part. Get over it.

IMO, the fun is to have a discussion where I can find another GNR fan, not some people stucked in the past who tries way too hard to bring down the current band.

Absolutely.  Slash WAS a huge part of the original line-up, Appetite WAS a great album, November Rain WAS a great video.  Now it's time to move on.  Yes, some people don't like the new album, or think it's average.  Yes, some people will never be fans of anything but the old line-up, and that is all fine.  They are entitled to their opinion.  However, G N' R is what it is. 

Should you wish to discuss what G N' R isn't, or what it was, there is an area of this forum devoted to fans of the previous line-up.  There are also many forums around exclusively dedicated to the old line-up.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:43:08 AM
Quote
Absolutely.  Slash WAS a huge part of the original line-up, Appetite WAS a great album, November Rain WAS a great video.  Now it's time to move on.  Yes, some people don't like the new album, or think it's average.  Yes, some people will never be fans of anything but the old line-up, and that is all fine.  They are entitled to their opinion.  However, G N' R is what it is. 

Should you wish to discuss what G N' R isn't, or what it was, there is an area of this forum devoted to fans of the previous line-up.  There are also many forums around exclusively dedicated to the old line-up.


Your absolutely right Uber!  I generally do keep to my own sections.  I appreciate that you have some positive things to say about everything.  What i couldn't stand was seeing a whole thread were people were putting slash down.  I felt the need to jump in and try to say something to defend the man.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 11:46:25 AM
Quote
Absolutely.  Slash WAS a huge part of the original line-up, Appetite WAS a great album, November Rain WAS a great video.  Now it's time to move on.  Yes, some people don't like the new album, or think it's average.  Yes, some people will never be fans of anything but the old line-up, and that is all fine.  They are entitled to their opinion.  However, G N' R is what it is. 

Should you wish to discuss what G N' R isn't, or what it was, there is an area of this forum devoted to fans of the previous line-up.  There are also many forums around exclusively dedicated to the old line-up.


Your absolutely right Uber!  I generally do keep to my own sections.  I appreciate that you have some positive things to say about everything.  What i couldn't stand was seeing a whole thread were people were putting slash down.  I felt the need to jump in and try to say something to defend the man.

go find a slash board

you don't support the band, you have no reason to be here.   you are just a slash troll looking to stir shit.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 02, 2009, 11:53:20 AM
Quote
go find a slash board

you don't support the band, you have no reason to be here.   you are just a slash troll looking to stir shit.

Well, you'll be happy to know that my shift here is finished and ill be heading home.  Im glad ive wound you up SO much Jim Bob.  Ill keep my eyes open for your pathetic trolling of the VR section.  Ill let you go back to discussing your average album.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 11:54:19 AM
Mind you there are new generation of fans who couldn't get into GNR for the 20 century sounding and found cd mind blowing.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 11:54:54 AM
Quote
go find a slash board

you don't support the band, you have no reason to be here.   you are just a slash troll looking to stir shit.

Well, you'll be happy to know that my shift here is finished and ill be heading home.  Im glad ive wound you up SO much Jim Bob.  Ill keep my eyes open for your pathetic trolling of the VR section.  Ill let you go back to discussing your average album.
why don't you just try a completely different site.

maybe slashtards.com ?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 11:56:07 AM
Ill let you go back to discussing your average album.

Well below average music is discussed here: http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?board=15.0

Stay there and enjoy! :)



By the way, next time you want to use the report to moderator feature, you might wanna take a look at your own posts before doing so.

You just act like an upset Slash fan trolling the GN'R section, and then report those who tell you to get lost.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Ali on March 02, 2009, 11:56:14 AM
Quote
go find a slash board

you don't support the band, you have no reason to be here.   you are just a slash troll looking to stir shit.

Well, you'll be happy to know that my shift here is finished and ill be heading home.  Im glad ive wound you up SO much Jim Bob.  Ill keep my eyes open for your pathetic trolling of the VR section.  Ill let you go back to discussing your average album.

Please go away.

You are contributing nothing to this discussion.  It's gone from being about the interview to being Slash vs. Axl.  Like we haven't had dozens of those threads already over the years.  ::)

Ali


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Uber-Tech on March 02, 2009, 11:58:41 AM
I generally do keep to my own sections.

Well, in that case, could you kindly bugger off back there and stop trying to wind people up?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 11:59:12 AM
Ok, enough already...




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: CheapJon on March 02, 2009, 12:00:22 PM
What i couldn't stand was seeing a whole thread were people were putting slash down.  I felt the need to jump in and try to say something to defend the man.

i'm not sure but i think this whole slash-bash-fest as you'd call it started with slashers crying about axl revealing his feelings about slash

most Axl and current GNRfans focused on the other things axl said  :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 12:01:14 PM
What i couldn't stand was seeing a whole thread were people were putting slash down.  I felt the need to jump in and try to say something to defend the man.

i'm not sure but i think this whole slash-bash-fest as you'd call it started with slashers crying about axl revealing his feelings about slash

most Axl and current GNRfans focused on the other things axl said  :)
true.. i mean it is a pretty long interview.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 12:08:39 PM
But somewhat those slashers managed to read just the parts regarding to the old line-up and claim the interview to be only about slash.

I doubt if they read further than the headlines.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 12:14:32 PM
Exactly.


Anybody who still has trouble understanding why GN'R has three guitar players:

Seriously, past Guns records have only two. Why did you feel the need for more on this endeavor?

I understand it's for whatever reason a bit of a challenge for most people to feel comfortable in their minds with any band having more than two guitarists, but technically, as far as our recording goes, we're a bit more alike with the older recordings than one might think. On the older records, though, it's very distinct that there are generally two guitar parts -- each part is actually performed and recorded twice, giving a fuller sound, so in effect you have four guitars. Leads and fills are another pass, and often songs were originally written and demos were done with other guitarists as well.

On 'Chinese,' instead of having the same player double his part, we chose to add another voice and either each player's own take on the part or their take of another's, then there's leads and fills which vary from one person or a few on a track. Also on this record, though, you may have one player playing more than one part in a section; they generally tend to be two distinct parts and not overdubs or harmonizing with their own leads or fills. No way is better than another; it's just whatever works for what you're trying to do, what you personally want or for whatever reason you feel you either need, choose or like.

For this record, I wanted a blend of different-style sounds and approaches; some at least a bit unique to the individual players and their takes on these songs. I feel the different personalities and techniques give the material its own sense of originality. Live, I prefer the more solid approach of the three guitars now, especially as the performances with the rhythm are more energetic, consistent and reliable. It was fun having Izzy on board a bit adding yet another voice to the mix and seemed to work better for the songs this way, as opposed to having him by himself.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 12:18:10 PM
I like the three guitarist assault. .

It works great live and on the album.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LeftToDecay on March 02, 2009, 12:24:26 PM
The interview isn't only about Slash in same way hard core porn isn't only about sex.
There are plot structures, credits.. lots of stuff.




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 12:32:54 PM
IMHO, the interview was about what's going on with Axl. To me, the answer about Robin did a lot, as I'm hoping to have him back on Guns. Also, there is some interesting stuff there too:

Exactly.


Anybody who still has trouble understanding why GN'R has three guitar players:

Seriously, past Guns records have only two. Why did you feel the need for more on this endeavor?

I understand it's for whatever reason a bit of a challenge for most people to feel comfortable in their minds with any band having more than two guitarists, but technically, as far as our recording goes, we're a bit more alike with the older recordings than one might think. On the older records, though, it's very distinct that there are generally two guitar parts -- each part is actually performed and recorded twice, giving a fuller sound, so in effect you have four guitars. Leads and fills are another pass, and often songs were originally written and demos were done with other guitarists as well.

On 'Chinese,' instead of having the same player double his part, we chose to add another voice and either each player's own take on the part or their take of another's, then there's leads and fills which vary from one person or a few on a track. Also on this record, though, you may have one player playing more than one part in a section; they generally tend to be two distinct parts and not overdubs or harmonizing with their own leads or fills. No way is better than another; it's just whatever works for what you're trying to do, what you personally want or for whatever reason you feel you either need, choose or like.

For this record, I wanted a blend of different-style sounds and approaches; some at least a bit unique to the individual players and their takes on these songs. I feel the different personalities and techniques give the material its own sense of originality. Live, I prefer the more solid approach of the three guitars now, especially as the performances with the rhythm are more energetic, consistent and reliable. It was fun having Izzy on board a bit adding yet another voice to the mix and seemed to work better for the songs this way, as opposed to having him by himself.




/jarmo
That should end some shit about the "no Robin and just Richard and Ron" stuff too.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 01:36:51 PM
Ron robin, bh, richard, paul and don't forget axl. :P


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: babydolls on March 02, 2009, 01:42:19 PM
I love this ques/answer:

Why so many guitars on 'Chinese Democracy'?
Why not?

damn right! why not indeed.  It worked well and in a live setting certainly throws the punches!

cheers del and Axl for this - i was interested in what he said of the Illusions drums too as nowadays as i listen to them, the drums seem to be the least energetic instrument on there, just seem flat in comparison to everything else, maybe its the production too.  







Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: falungong69 on March 02, 2009, 02:03:46 PM
I love this ques/answer:

Why so many guitars on 'Chinese Democracy'?
Why not?

damn right! why not indeed.  It worked well and in a live setting certainly throws the punches!

cheers del and Axl for this - i was interested in what he said of the Illusions drums too as nowadays as i listen to them, the drums seem to be the least energetic instrument on there, just seem flat in comparison to everything else, maybe its the production too.  







when you have a sub-par band, you get sub-par performances. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: dimitrisaxl on March 02, 2009, 02:08:03 PM
I love this ques/answer:

Why so many guitars on 'Chinese Democracy'?
Why not?

damn right! why not indeed.  It worked well and in a live setting certainly throws the punches!

cheers del and Axl for this - i was interested in what he said of the Illusions drums too as nowadays as i listen to them, the drums seem to be the least energetic instrument on there, just seem flat in comparison to everything else, maybe its the production too.  







when you have a sub-par band, you get sub-par performances. 
Old GNR was a great band.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 02:10:48 PM
GNR is a great band.  :-*

and I always prefer the present.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 02:14:31 PM
Guns past and present rock!!!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: dimitrisaxl on March 02, 2009, 02:23:29 PM
Guns past and present rock!!!
Totally agree.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 02:23:30 PM
Wow this alone is Here Today Gone To Hell

Jesus, I go to bed, go to school and come home and damn there are some fireworks in here


Let me clear up some shit:

1. I never said I wanted a reunion. I was pointing out something Axl said in his interview, so don't blame me, I'm not the one who worded shit weird.

2. Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is very very valid. It is the breaking point where something will give one way or the other. I'm not saying there will be a reunion, but shit will be very very interesting come 2012.

3. Think about this: If u had to lay down everything u own that there will never be a reunion, would u? would u bet your life on it?  I think there is a 99 percent chance that a reunion will never take place but damn it, don't sit there and act like crazier shit hasn't happened. Ask Van Halen fans or Eagles Fans.

All I know is, At RIR III, Axl was against EVERYBODY, now he is just against Slash........... just saying, the grudges are fading a bit. I think Axl finally getting to speak his peace will in turn help in the forgiveness and healing process.



Also, I think its BS how Jim Bob gets a way with Insulting members who are just posting. That is really uncalled for and should be reprimanded regardless of how much he is on the Axl side of the issue.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 02:29:05 PM
I try to avoid anything that might be cancerous. I wouldn't call it a grudge.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 02:33:02 PM
I try to avoid anything that might be cancerous. I wouldn't call it a grudge.

Yeah, I mean that is very very harsh but who would've thought 6 years ago he'd want something to do with Duff?

If it never happened, I am fine with that, I can be happy with this lineup of GNR, I think though u should never say never cause like i said, who knows 5 years from now.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 02:47:41 PM
I try to avoid anything that might be cancerous. I wouldn't call it a grudge.

Yeah, I mean that is very very harsh but who would've thought 6 years ago he'd want something to do with Duff?

If it never happened, I am fine with that, I can be happy with this lineup of GNR, I think though u should never say never cause like i said, who knows 5 years from now.

cor blimey axl nor slash shouldn't die so early.I betcha.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 02:49:39 PM
I try to avoid anything that might be cancerous. I wouldn't call it a grudge.

Yeah, I mean that is very very harsh but who would've thought 6 years ago he'd want something to do with Duff?

If it never happened, I am fine with that, I can be happy with this lineup of GNR, I think though u should never say never cause like i said, who knows 5 years from now.


Learned a long time ago to never say never.... Just asking to have to eat those words along with shit later.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 02, 2009, 03:00:58 PM
Wow this alone is Here Today Gone To Hell

Jesus, I go to bed, go to school and come home and damn there are some fireworks in here


Let me clear up some shit:

1. I never said I wanted a reunion. I was pointing out something Axl said in his interview, so don't blame me, I'm not the one who worded shit weird.

2. Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is very very valid. It is the breaking point where something will give one way or the other. I'm not saying there will be a reunion, but shit will be very very interesting come 2012.

3. Think about this: If u had to lay down everything u own that there will never be a reunion, would u? would u bet your life on it?  I think there is a 99 percent chance that a reunion will never take place but damn it, don't sit there and act like crazier shit hasn't happened. Ask Van Halen fans or Eagles Fans.

All I know is, At RIR III, Axl was against EVERYBODY, now he is just against Slash........... just saying, the grudges are fading a bit. I think Axl finally getting to speak his peace will in turn help in the forgiveness and healing process.



Also, I think its BS how Jim Bob gets a way with Insulting members who are just posting. That is really uncalled for and should be reprimanded regardless of how much he is on the Axl side of the issue.


Jim Bob isn't coming on the boards and making a scene like you D.  Who cares what will happen at RNRHOF, quit bringing up this reunion crap.  Jim Bob wouldn't be posting the stuff he is, if fans like you wouldn't come here and try to make everything about Slash.   Hate to break the news but the Slash ship has sailed along time ago and it sunk.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 02, 2009, 03:14:12 PM
Regarding the whole 'whoring' debate, surely if Slash is a sell-out for doing GH3 then Aerosmith & Metallica are also whores? Hmm those being 2 of the biggest bands in the world lets see how it has damaged there stock....hmm look at that it hasn't. And I find it VERY hypocritical people complaining especially since Chinese Democracy is coming out for Rock Band....seems we've gone full circle.

Ill let you go back to discussing your average album.

Well below average music is discussed here: http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?board=15.0

Stay there and enjoy! :)



By the way, next time you want to use the report to moderator feature, you might wanna take a look at your own posts before doing so.

You just act like an upset Slash fan trolling the GN'R section, and then report those who tell you to get lost.




/jarmo

Aren't Admins & Mods meant to be mature and understanding? You just seem to try and make everything personal when people try to either make a point or give there opinions in a controlled post.

Gotta say you calling VR below average music didn't stop you going to see them live did it? I'm just saying.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 03:20:05 PM
I am making a scene?

How? By trying to lend some unbiased viewpoints and by debating possible down the road scenarios?

I know that unlike Jim Bob, I don't go around insulting people.

I just want to know the difference.

Slash talks about Axl on the radio and he is a whore living off old GNR and trying to sell records using Axl for publicity


Axl does the exact same thing and all of a sudden it is him "Telling his side of the story"


Maybe Slash was just telling his side right? What is the difference?

Slash wrote a book, Axl wrote a song...... kind of the same thing right?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 03:20:27 PM
Gotta say VR being below average music stopped many people going to see them live including jarmo. I'm just saying. :P


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 02, 2009, 03:30:02 PM
well, he hasn't exactly being replaced has he.  unless its by mediocrity.

He were, by Buckethead. Slash's time is long over baby, like Rolling Stones.

Great times, great era's and great musicians.

and I always prefer the present.

Yeah, me too. New music-approaches by talented musicians, and a killer singer.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 03:31:58 PM
Gotta say VR being below average music stopped many people going to see them live including jarmo. I'm just saying. :P


I could of swore I remember Jarmo going to some VR shows.


Never got the whole you can like one but not the other thing some of you have going on!!!




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 03:41:16 PM
Gotta say VR being below average music stopped many people going to see them live including jarmo. I'm just saying. :P


I could of swore I remember Jarmo going to some VR shows.


Never got the whole you can like one but not the other thing some of you have going on!!!




yes you can like the music and you don't have to support the musicians every deed.

but I doubt jarmo went and saw VR after the some shows?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on March 02, 2009, 03:46:55 PM
 Hate to break the news but the Slash ship has sailed along time ago and it sunk.

Then why does so much time get devoted to him in interviews still? I realize Slash isn't coming back and don't see why all the negativity needs to get rehashed.  That's like saying you're over an ex-girlfriend and then all you want to talk about is how much you hate her.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 03:48:08 PM
Aren't Admins & Mods meant to be mature and understanding? You just seem to try and make everything personal when people try to either make a point or give there opinions in a controlled post.

Yes, I can be understanding. But not when a hypocritical troll tries to act like he's a victim.


Gotta say you calling VR below average music didn't stop you going to see them live did it? I'm just saying.

No, it didn't.

Seeing them live just proved it even more how great Axl truly is.  :)


Maybe if you're lucky, Del will interview me next time so we can talk more about what bands I've seen live etc.? You know, since you Slash fans seem so hell bent on talking about me. If it's not in your own little section then it's here in the GN'R section.


* fingers crossed *



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 02, 2009, 03:55:27 PM
Aren't Admins & Mods meant to be mature and understanding? You just seem to try and make everything personal when people try to either make a point or give there opinions in a controlled post.

Yes, I can be understanding. But not when a hypocritical troll tries to act like he's a victim.


Gotta say you calling VR below average music didn't stop you going to see them live did it? I'm just saying.

No, it didn't.

Seeing them live just proved it even more how great Axl truly is.  :)


Maybe if you're lucky, Del will interview me next time so we can talk more about what bands I've seen live etc.? You know, since you Slash fans seem so hell bent on talking about me. If it's not in your own little section then it's here in the GN'R section.


* fingers crossed *



/jarmo

Wow, thanks for proving my point of how egotistical and self-satisfying you have to act like in order to keep face.....God forbid somebody disagrees with you!  :nervous:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 04:10:14 PM
So you're obsessed with jarmo like younggunner? :nervous:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 02, 2009, 04:21:15 PM
I saw VR live and they stunk, I saw GnR live and it was the best concert i've seen.  Its quite simple ! GnR fans post here, VR fans post in the other little section about former members ugggh Slash who still has been talking about Axl for the past decade.  In this thread I would like to state that its great that both Robin and Brain r not going anywhere.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 02, 2009, 04:22:50 PM
Aren't Admins & Mods meant to be mature and understanding? You just seem to try and make everything personal when people try to either make a point or give there opinions in a controlled post.

Yes, I can be understanding. But not when a hypocritical troll tries to act like he's a victim.


Gotta say you calling VR below average music didn't stop you going to see them live did it? I'm just saying.

No, it didn't.

Seeing them live just proved it even more how great Axl truly is.  :)


Maybe if you're lucky, Del will interview me next time so we can talk more about what bands I've seen live etc.? You know, since you Slash fans seem so hell bent on talking about me. If it's not in your own little section then it's here in the GN'R section.


* fingers crossed *



/jarmo
Jarmo I think that you should ask him to do just that.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 04:32:03 PM
Wow, thanks for proving my point of how egotistical and self-satisfying you have to act like in order to keep face.....God forbid somebody disagrees with you!  :nervous:

You're the one who started talking about me, not me.  : ok:

Me answering your bullshit makes me egoistical? All right. Weird definition of the word, but whatever.

Maybe if you didn't reply to my post with the VR bullshit, I wouldn't have made that post in the first place?


If somebody disagrees with me why can't I tell them I disagree? Why does it upset you? Why is it that I'm not allowed to disagree with any posters, especially those who are fans of Slash? Could you please explain that, and try not to point out all my faults because really it's not the topic of the discussion?


If you believe in your opinion, shouldn't you be able to stand for it instead of trying to insult me and post all this off topic nonsense about what shows I've gone to?

You post on a message board and get upset because I reply to your posts saying I don't agree with you? What the fuck do you expect? A cookie?





/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 02, 2009, 04:35:55 PM
I want a cookie. :D


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: greekmule on March 02, 2009, 04:40:10 PM
Quote
If you don't think I would've liked to have five 'Appetites' and been living like the Stones at the time, you're high. With that, any other avenue I hoped to pursue musically would more than likely been available as well.

can someone explain this to me? I am not sure what Axl is trying to say here...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 04:42:26 PM
I saw VR live and they stunk, I saw GnR live and it was the best concert i've seen.  Its quite simple !
Same here. I didn't even bother to come close to the stage, as it was really a downer to watch them playing Its So Easy (and many were saying "it's how it was meant to be played").

In this thread I would like to state that its great that both Robin and Brain r not going anywhere.
+2

I am making a scene?

How? By trying to lend some unbiased viewpoints
Stopped reading there.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 02, 2009, 05:03:08 PM
Wow, thanks for proving my point of how egotistical and self-satisfying you have to act like in order to keep face.....God forbid somebody disagrees with you!  :nervous:

You're the one who started talking about me, not me.  : ok:

Me answering your bullshit makes me egoistical? All right. Weird definition of the word, but whatever.

Maybe if you didn't reply to my post with the VR bullshit, I wouldn't have made that post in the first place?


If somebody disagrees with me why can't I tell them I disagree? Why does it upset you? Why is it that I'm not allowed to disagree with any posters, especially those who are fans of Slash? Could you please explain that, and try not to point out all my faults because really it's not the topic of the discussion?


If you believe in your opinion, shouldn't you be able to stand for it instead of trying to insult me and post all this off topic nonsense about what shows I've gone to?

You post on a message board and get upset because I reply to your posts saying I don't agree with you? What the fuck do you expect? A cookie?





/jarmo


To disagree is fine and is the basis of all forums survival, but you just seem to have an alteria motive towards certain people with no explanation.

Fair enough our opinions differ but it was you who made it personal, as you have done with everyone else who thought Axl saying "Cancer" was too far. You bring up irrelevant nonsense that is void of the subject matter (much like your making me do here) and end up trying to be a victor on a forum which is equivelent to winning scrabble against a dyslexic person aka it means nothing. Your just determined to get a personal victory and if your that insecure that you have to do that then fine battle away all you want if thats what it takes to keep you "happy", it's the least of my worries.

By egotistical, I was referring to how you try to build yourself up while bringing anyone you don't like down with childish mind games knowing everyone will follow your lead cause your in charge. If you think this upsets me then I personally feel sorry for you and your view of life.

Bashing on people such as younggunner & D just shows off how uncontrolled this forum can be. Whether or not you disagree with D or younggunner, you've gotta agree JimBob and others were way out of line with there posts and on any other matter would result in negative karma which to be honest is making you look bad for allowing things like that to accure yet punishing others with different views.

Yes I am a fan of Slash and that is the reason I started playing guitar but I'm also a huge BBF fan aswell as BH so you do realise it is possible to be a fan of VR, GN'R (Old & New)? I have saw VR live & new GN'R live and have loved both, I make a point not to compare both and not pick a favourite or jump on the bandwagon of whatever the majority like.

The music is all that matters and I think thats were alot of people have missed the point and defended people they don't even know (Axl, Slash) just because they love the music. See your saying Axl can get away with it cause he's Axl, take the music away and he sounds bitter and slightly cold-hearted. We (You, Me & everyone else) don't know how they live there lives or what they do and why should we, just try to be more balanced with your replies instead of stating things you have no thought of knowing for certain.

Now I hope everyone can just get on with this without insulting or giving unwarrented posts such as wishing harm upon a persons life which is just dispicable.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 05:08:46 PM
I saw VR live and they stunk, I saw GnR live and it was the best concert i've seen.  Its quite simple !
Same here. I didn't even bother to come close to the stage, as it was really a downer to watch them playing Its So Easy (and many were saying "it's how it was meant to be played").

In this thread I would like to state that its great that both Robin and Brain r not going anywhere.
+2

I am making a scene?

How? By trying to lend some unbiased viewpoints
Stopped reading there.



WOW, that is really hysterical

I am biased?

Are u the pot or the kettle? Jesus

This whole fucking thread is biased one way or the other

I think I am one of the few that has had ANY objectivity and that is really scary.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 05:11:52 PM
so whose side are you on? don't be sissy.


Bashing on people such as younggunner & D just shows off how uncontrolled this forum can be. Whether or not you disagree with D or younggunner, you've gotta agree JimBob and others were way out of line with there posts and on any other matter would result in negative karma which to be honest is making you look bad for allowing things like that to accure yet punishing others with different views.

somewhat jim bob, others and myself manage to have more negative karmas than you.  :P


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 05:14:13 PM
why does one have to be on one side or they other???


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: LunsJail on March 02, 2009, 05:15:06 PM
Quote
If you don't think I would've liked to have five 'Appetites' and been living like the Stones at the time, you're high. With that, any other avenue I hoped to pursue musically would more than likely been available as well.

can someone explain this to me? I am not sure what Axl is trying to say here...

I think he's saying that he could have done five albums like Appetite (had the old Guns songwriting process not broken down) and then had the success and money to do anything he wanted in a different direction. To me, he had that option anyway and that's pretty much what he did. So I'm still lost too.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 02, 2009, 05:16:22 PM
why does one have to be on one side or they other???

Exactly my point. Some just feel obligated to defend at any given time.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 05:19:46 PM
why does one have to be on one side or they other???

nope you don't have to. but if you weren't on either side, why should you comment on the axl vs slash issue?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 05:21:04 PM
Just cause you don't choose a side doesn't mean you can't have an opinion on things both have said / done.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 02, 2009, 05:24:19 PM
Quote
If you don't think I would've liked to have five 'Appetites' and been living like the Stones at the time, you're high. With that, any other avenue I hoped to pursue musically would more than likely been available as well.

can someone explain this to me? I am not sure what Axl is trying to say here...
I think he means that he would have liked to continue being part of the biggest rock band on the planet . If they had continued with as much commercial success he would have more freedom to pursue other avenues.  The other members of the band were just too dysfunctional to continue. I have said this before, AXL ROSE is the heart and soul of GNR! And i will always be proud to be on TEAM AXL. Now give me my cookie!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 05:27:26 PM
I think I am one of the few that has had ANY objectivity and that is really scary.
Scary is how you think you're being objectivity when say things like that:

Axl talking about Detractors and media and fans Building up HYPE. Here he is promising a SRV type solo from Robin.

I have heard Robin do live solos and on CD and I don't see how he possibly could pull something like that off. People have heard the great SRV play right? So when we do hear this solo and if it doesn't quite meet expectation, I guess it will be our faults again for hyping it up.

So, let's talk about objectivity.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 02, 2009, 05:29:19 PM
why does one have to be on one side or they other???
Why not?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 02, 2009, 05:30:54 PM
why does one have to be on one side or they other???
Why not?
Just because we are too passionate to stay neutral.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 02, 2009, 05:36:26 PM
Just cause you don't choose a side doesn't mean you can't have an opinion on things both have said / done.

Yes and the opinion sides.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 02, 2009, 05:38:07 PM
Just cause you don't choose a side doesn't mean you can't have an opinion on things both have said / done.

Yes and the opinion sides.
Great observation! :beer:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: *Timothy* on March 02, 2009, 05:42:50 PM
Just cause you don't choose a side doesn't mean you can't have an opinion on things both have said / done.

Yes and the opinion sides.


No not really cause it goes form the topic at hand not as a whole .


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 05:54:47 PM
To disagree is fine and is the basis of all forums survival, but you just seem to have an alteria motive towards certain people with no explanation.

No explanation?

The guy you jumped in to defend starts posting about how mediocre the GN'R album is (hello?) and then reports posts telling him to go to a Slash forum.

What did he expect would happen?

You play with fire and so on...

Sorry if you think I'm here to defend Slash fans who don't like GN'R. Maybe I haven't been clear enough what this site is about and whose fans it's for.



Fair enough our opinions differ but it was you who made it personal, as you have done with everyone else who thought Axl saying "Cancer" was too far. You bring up irrelevant nonsense that is void of the subject matter (much like your making me do here) and end up trying to be a victor on a forum which is equivelent to winning scrabble against a dyslexic person aka it means nothing. Your just determined to get a personal victory and if your that insecure that you have to do that then fine battle away all you want if thats what it takes to keep you "happy", it's the least of my worries.


I don't care about victories.

If I see something I don't agree with, I say so.

I don't sugar coat shit to make you feel better. I say what I think.

Maybe it hurts your feelings because you spent 15 minutes typing a post that you think is awesome and then I jump in to tell you you're wrong.

Sorry about that, but that's how I am. I try get to the point as quickly as possible.

So I might skip the congratulations on making an excellent post and so on.



By egotistical, I was referring to how you try to build yourself up while bringing anyone you don't like down with childish mind games knowing everyone will follow your lead cause your in charge. If you think this upsets me then I personally feel sorry for you and your view of life.

Obviously your view on what I do isn't based in reality.

The so called mind games are my opinions.



Bashing on people such as younggunner & D just shows off how uncontrolled this forum can be. Whether or not you disagree with D or younggunner, you've gotta agree JimBob and others were way out of line with there posts and on any other matter would result in negative karma which to be honest is making you look bad for allowing things like that to accure yet punishing others with different views.

It's funny you bring up all these personal attacks and haven't even mentioned all the shit I've been called.


See your saying Axl can get away with it cause he's Axl, take the music away and he sounds bitter and slightly cold-hearted.


We (You, Me & everyone else) don't know how they live there lives or what they do and why should we, just try to be more balanced with your replies instead of stating things you have no thought of knowing for certain.

Great that you just showed me an example of what I've been saying all along.

We don't know anything about Axl's life. We don't have to deal with the things he has to since none of us sing in a huge band.

So instead of just pointing fingers and saying "he shouldn't have done that!", I keep an open mind. I know that it's not easy for me to relate because I don't know the full story or have all the facts.


But do you? You just label him "bitter".  When I point out that maybe if you lived his life, you'd say worse things, you get upset that I disagree....


Does that make you balanced?

I don't pretend to be objective, balanced and whatever else you want to call it.

I don't know when it became such a must for a fan to be objective. If you're a fan of something, where is the rule that you have to be objective? I don't get it. I guess it all comes down to the fact that in order to be "cool" and "respected" on the Internet, you have to be objective and bash your "favorite" band so nobody figures out you're one of those lame fan boys!!1!!111!!!!!



In my opinion, it's ok to be biased. It's kinda expected.

Nobody expects a Yankees fan to have a 100% objective view on the Red Sox! And they probably love their own team more than those who are outsiders.


Why would you start listening to your favorite band's new album with the attitude that "let's see what sucks on this one?" or go to a show thinking "let's see what I can find to complain about?"?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 06:32:34 PM
That is BS Jarmo. When have I ever Insulted you?

A Rod gets his ass booed out of the stadium by Yankee Fans. Cause 99 percent of fans are objective and aren't afraid to voice their opinion when they feel it is necessary.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 06:33:55 PM
That is BS Jarmo. When have I ever Insulted you?

What I meant was, he was upset that you were insulted.

But has he been defending me or posting about how wrong it is to insult me?




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 02, 2009, 06:35:31 PM
To be honest I'm getting bored arguing with you cause it's getting neither of us anywhere and is pretty pathetic really.

One thing I would just like point out:

Gotta say you calling VR below average music didn't stop you going to see them live did it? I'm just saying.

No, it didn't.

Seeing them live just proved it even more how great Axl truly is.  :)

/jarmo

Now thats not what you say here:

VR did a great show and added "Bodies" as the last song which was a nice surprise. Duff and Slash seemed to be having a great time, both were smiling a lot.

VR came on and played a great show with a nice surprise at the end. A cover of The Doors' "Five To One".

/jarmo


Aren't Admins & Mods meant to be mature and understanding? You just seem to try and make everything personal when people try to either make a point or give there opinions in a controlled post.

Yes, I can be understanding. But not when a hypocritical troll tries to act like he's a victim.



Ah never has this been more fitting.

I'm interested to see what your excuse is this time?  ::)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 06:41:11 PM
That is BS Jarmo. When have I ever Insulted you?

What I meant was, he was upset that you were insulted.

But has he been defending me or posting about how wrong it is to insult me?




/jarmo

Gotcha : ok:

Here is my thing and I hope people read this. I, of course, Don't enjoy being insulted and called names. Now if I was some blatant Axl hater who just came on here and said Axl Sucks, Slash is the best, he needs to shut up, CD sucks etc. Sure, I deserve to be smacked.

I don't feel I do that. I have agreed with Axl when I feel he is right, but I don't think I have to agree with him if I honestly don't agree with him.

I am just maybe too objective. Maybe it is my personality, I don't know, but I assure u, I am that way with everything. I am objective when I feel Axl is wrong, I am the first to say how shitty I think it is when Slash plays with Fergie or does something else. I am the first to say How embarrassed I am when Bon Jovi did American Idol, country album etc etc When my favorite NBA team traded a great young up and coming guy for a Hall Of Famer on his last legs and our team goes to shit, I don't say make excuses for that, I am honest and say u know what? that was a bad trade.


For me, that isn't trying to  be a detractor or hate on what I like, I just don't always love and agree with everything. Doesn't mean I am any less of a fan, I am just a different type with a different outlook and I am not sure one way is better than the other.


If I disagree with my best friend over something we don't stop being friends so I don't know why everyone jumps people's ass on here, when they question a thing or two Axl does.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 06:44:41 PM
To be honest I'm getting bored arguing with you cause it's getting neither of us anywhere and is pretty pathetic really.

Exactly. When you don't have the answers, it's pathetic and the best thing to do is to pretend nothing has happened!





Now thats not what you say here:

VR did a great show and added "Bodies" as the last song which was a nice surprise. Duff and Slash seemed to be having a great time, both were smiling a lot.

VR came on and played a great show with a nice surprise at the end. A cover of The Doors' "Five To One".



So?

What's your point?

I'll spell it out for you. At the time, that's what I though.

Then I happened to see GN'R in 2006 and the reference system kinda changed.

I realized what I had been missing all those years and all the hyped substitutes didn't matter anymore!


As I said, more of the usual personal shit from you.

The wrestling fans stick together!  :yes:



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 06:50:54 PM
To be honest I'm getting bored arguing with you cause it's getting neither of us anywhere and is pretty pathetic really.

Exactly. When you don't have the answers, it's pathetic and the best thing to do is to pretend nothing has happened!





Now thats not what you say here:

VR did a great show and added "Bodies" as the last song which was a nice surprise. Duff and Slash seemed to be having a great time, both were smiling a lot.

VR came on and played a great show with a nice surprise at the end. A cover of The Doors' "Five To One".



So?

What's your point?

I'll spell it out for you. At the time, that's what I though.

Then I happened to see GN'R in 2006 and the reference system kinda changed.

I realized what I had been missing all those years and all the hyped substitutes didn't matter anymore!


As I said, more of the usual personal shit from you.

The wrestling fans stick together!  :yes:



/jarmo


No No, actually the wrestling fans hate me more than the Axl fans. :P


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: chineseblues on March 02, 2009, 06:53:13 PM
Now if I was some blatant Axl hater who just came on here and said Axl Sucks, Slash is the best, he needs to shut up, CD sucks etc. Sure, I deserve to be smacked.

Maybe not a total Axl hater but most defiantly a Robin hater. I don't think I have ever seen you say any nice things about him, and whenever someone does or say they prefer Robin to slash, you always put Robin down. So you can't say you are always objective.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 02, 2009, 06:55:02 PM
It's so ridiculous how these people choose to focus on me when they don't have anything to say. It seems like it's the Slash fans, which makes sense since the same thing happens in the VR section.

Predictable.  : ok:


What the fuck does that fact that I saw VR live in London four years ago have to do with this interview?

Oooh, it proves my undying love for Slash. I got it!

 ::)



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 06:57:49 PM
Now if I was some blatant Axl hater who just came on here and said Axl Sucks, Slash is the best, he needs to shut up, CD sucks etc. Sure, I deserve to be smacked.

Maybe not a total Axl hater but most defiantly a Robin hater. I don't think I have ever seen you say any nice things about him, and whenever someone does or say they prefer Robin to slash, you always put Robin down. So you can't say you are always objective.

Absolutely and it has nothing at all to do with Slash I promise. There are people in music that you just don't click with. It has nothing to do with Robin Personally, I like his stage presence and think he is a very cool guy. I just honest to God hate his guitar style. There are tons of guitar players that I don't like their style. I mean I absolutely would rather watch Paint Dry than listen to any of Joe Perry's Guitar Solos from the 90's and I love Aerosmith.

It is just a personal taste thing.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 07:01:50 PM
It's so ridiculous how these people choose to focus on me when they don't have anything to say. It seems like it's the Slash fans, which makes sense since the same thing happens in the VR section.

Predictable.  : ok:


What the fuck does that fact that I saw VR live in London four years ago have to do with this interview?

Oooh, it proves my undying love for Slash. I got it!

 ::)



/jarmo

no, it proves that you can change right? so why aren't other people allowed to change their opinions? Maybe Slash hated Axl in 1997 but doesn't in 2009?

I got called two faced and all sorts of shit because I didn't really like the guitar playing 2 months ago, but a month later I make a post saying I now like most of it and all of a sudden I am this two faced hypocrite whatever.


U have your right to change your mind on VR or whatever, but I think other people should be allowed the same without consequence.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: chineseblues on March 02, 2009, 07:04:30 PM
Now if I was some blatant Axl hater who just came on here and said Axl Sucks, Slash is the best, he needs to shut up, CD sucks etc. Sure, I deserve to be smacked.

Maybe not a total Axl hater but most defiantly a Robin hater. I don't think I have ever seen you say any nice things about him, and whenever someone does or say they prefer Robin to slash, you always put Robin down. So you can't say you are always objective.

Absolutely and it has nothing at all to do with Slash I promise. There are people in music that you just don't click with. It has nothing to do with Robin Personally, I like his stage presence and think he is a very cool guy. I just honest to God hate his guitar style. There are tons of guitar players that I don't like their style. I mean I absolutely would rather watch Paint Dry than listen to any of Joe Perry's Guitar Solos from the 90's and I love Aerosmith.

It is just a personal taste thing.

No it's a you think your better then him thing which doesn't make you objective at all.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash666 on March 02, 2009, 07:15:39 PM
It's so ridiculous how these people choose to focus on me when they don't have anything to say. It seems like it's the Slash fans, which makes sense since the same thing happens in the VR section.

Predictable.  : ok:


What the fuck does that fact that I saw VR live in London four years ago have to do with this interview?

Oooh, it proves my undying love for Slash. I got it!

 ::)



/jarmo

no, it proves that you can change right? so why aren't other people allowed to change their opinions? Maybe Slash hated Axl in 1997 but doesn't in 2009?

I got called two faced and all sorts of shit because I didn't really like the guitar playing 2 months ago, but a month later I make a post saying I now like most of it and all of a sudden I am this two faced hypocrite whatever.


U have your right to change your mind on VR or whatever, but I think other people should be allowed the same without consequence.

Couldn't have said it better!

Ok Jarmo, lets just end this debating. Lets just act like grown men and just agree to disagree, agreed?

Now if I was some blatant Axl hater who just came on here and said Axl Sucks, Slash is the best, he needs to shut up, CD sucks etc. Sure, I deserve to be smacked.

Maybe not a total Axl hater but most defiantly a Robin hater. I don't think I have ever seen you say any nice things about him, and whenever someone does or say they prefer Robin to slash, you always put Robin down. So you can't say you are always objective.

Absolutely and it has nothing at all to do with Slash I promise. There are people in music that you just don't click with. It has nothing to do with Robin Personally, I like his stage presence and think he is a very cool guy. I just honest to God hate his guitar style. There are tons of guitar players that I don't like their style. I mean I absolutely would rather watch Paint Dry than listen to any of Joe Perry's Guitar Solos from the 90's and I love Aerosmith.

It is just a personal taste thing.

No it's a you think your better then him thing which doesn't make you objective at all.

I'm sorry that is just ridiculous, he just said he didn't like his style of playing just like I really don't like Joe Satriani's playing style but I still have alot of respect for him, it really IS down to your own personal taste. Your just looking for arguments with that statement.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 07:16:24 PM
That is a whole nother can of worms that I'd rather not get back into. Someone insulted me and something I take seriously, so it turned into a giant pissing contest.


Music is one of the most subjective things in the world. Look at how many people don't like GNR for Christ's sake. I mean music doesn't always appeal to ones ear as it does to another.

Robin has his moments here and there. His Better Solo is great but Im not a fan of how he plays the old stuff and I'm not a fan of some of his other solos on the album. He has a herky/jerky kind of thing where its like he tries to be Too fancy where it isn't required. I just don't feel that emotional connection, Bucket I feel unbelievably well and Ron on most songs not named Catcher.
Once again, I don't hate Robin. I think he is fucking awesome when I see him play live with NIN.

I mean shit, I fucking hate U2 with a passion also. I mean it is just different strokes for different folks.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AdZ on March 02, 2009, 07:44:50 PM
no, it proves that you can change right? so why aren't other people allowed to change their opinions? Maybe Slash hated Axl in 1997 but doesn't in 2009?


Oh sure, that makes the constant law suits make total sense.

"Hey Bro! I don't hate you anymore! Here, have a lawsuit! : ok:"



 ::)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Ali on March 02, 2009, 07:48:39 PM
no, it proves that you can change right? so why aren't other people allowed to change their opinions? Maybe Slash hated Axl in 1997 but doesn't in 2009?


Oh sure, that makes the constant law suits make total sense.

"Hey Bro! I don't hate you anymore! Here, have a lawsuit! : ok:"



 ::)

Even if those lawsuits don't represent Slash's sense of animosity towards Axl, they will, at the very least, not help dissipate any lingering feelings of hostility between the two.  It's like having a wound and continually picking at the scab instead of letting it go and allowing it to heal.

Ali


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 07:51:03 PM
To be fair, u nor I know anything about what was behind those lawsuits.

One can say though, Since they don't have a relationship to pick up the phone and discuss stuff with one another, lawsuits may be the only way to get certain information right?

If I am owed X amount of dollars, and I don't receive X amount of dollars that I have received on time for the last however many years, U are damned right I am gonna sue and find out what is going on.

Doesn't mean anything malicious happened. What are they suppose to do? Ok, never mind our Royalty checks, u keep them, we don't want to offend you by suing. Come on, who the hell would do that?

What also is forgotten is, they share equal partnerships I assume in all the old Appetite material. So if Axl is turning down Film offers without consulting the other former publishing holders, that also is grounds to sue.


So unless they sued him for some frivolous shit I don't know about, if they did and u know about it, let me know, I think those were pretty justified.

Might I add, they dropped them also once they got the answers they were looking for right?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AxlsMainMan on March 02, 2009, 08:00:59 PM
If I am owed X amount of dollars, and I don't receive X amount of dollars that I have received on time for the last however many years, U are damned right I am gonna sue and find out what is going on.

Or you could just pick up the phone and call the agency responsible for allocating those funds.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 08:03:23 PM
Maybe they tried and found out their royalty company got switched without their knowledge?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AxlsMainMan on March 02, 2009, 08:07:15 PM
So suing Axl helps the situation how?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 08:14:09 PM
Because he is the one that transferred the publishing over t Sanctuary without the other guy's knowledge.

So when they don't get their checks, and they see he has transferred the publishing, they sue to get clarification

A lot of times, people only sue to get clarification and not to be malicious or to try and do something evil.

Just like the logo. Maybe that is on Merck, but since Slash apparently owns the copyright, he has a right to sue if someone is using it without his permission or without paying him his cut.

This isn't about integrity or right or wrong, we are talking strictly business here.

Personally, I am very very very happy Axl has never whored out the GNR catalog to Car Commercials etc. The movies are getting a little ridiculous and I blame that more on Slash and Duff than I do Axl.

But, those guys do have a stake in those songs. If they want to make money selling SCOM to Last House on The Left that is their right and they should all have a say, not just one person no matter if we agree or not, that is business.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AxlsMainMan on March 02, 2009, 08:22:36 PM
Because he is the one that transferred the publishing over t Sanctuary without the other guy's knowledge.

So when they don't get their checks, and they see he has transferred the publishing, they sue to get clarification

A lot of times, people only sue to get clarification and not to be malicious or to try and do something evil.

Just like the logo. Maybe that is on Merck, but since Slash apparently owns the copyright, he has a right to sue if someone is using it without his permission or without paying him his cut.

This isn't about integrity or right or wrong, we are talking strictly business here.

Personally, I am very very very happy Axl has never whored out the GNR catalog to Car Commercials etc. The movies are getting a little ridiculous and I blame that more on Slash and Duff than I do Axl.

But, those guys do have a stake in those songs. If they want to make money selling SCOM to Last House on The Left that is their right and they should all have a say, not just one person no matter if we agree or not, that is business.

So they think Axl hid their $20,000 under his matress and hoped no one would find out?

To a multi-millionaire like Axl, that's milk money. What does he gain from keeping their money from them?

No lawsuit is required.

All that needed to be done was for Slash and Duff to call their attorney(s), accountant(s), or both; and see why the paper trail of cash ran cold.

Jumping to baseless accusations and pulling the trigger on a frivolous lawsuit appears to have been much easier though.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 08:26:18 PM
Like i said though, we don't know all the facts so really I don't know enough to give hardcore evidence.

I am just saying, people, especially when they are unable to have personal contact, talk through lawyers. Sometimes suing is the only/fastest way to get clarity of a situation.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: chineseblues on March 02, 2009, 09:01:39 PM
Because he is the one that transferred the publishing over t Sanctuary without the other guy's knowledge.

When he changed it over it was all over the press. There is no way you can say they didn't know when even WE knew.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 02, 2009, 09:26:24 PM

Also, I think its BS how Jim Bob gets a way with Insulting members who are just posting. That is really uncalled for and should be reprimanded regardless of how much he is on the Axl side of the issue.

I'm not sure who I insulted, but I know I can be a dick sometimes.

This isn't the board people usually go to when they want to have an axl v slash debate.   There are sites on the internet dedicated to that very debate.   I'm past the past and want to live in the now.  I don't really give a shit about what slash is doing or vr all that much.     So when I notice posters here who have an apparent loathing for all thing GnR post-1996, I ask them what the fuck they are doing here.

This is pretty much the only GnR board I post on these days.. why?  Because I am tired of the same tired arguments from slash fans.   I have no desire to read their opinions or thoughts, they are irrelevant now to what is going on in GnR land.   So when some Axl hater/Slash troll is posting here, I'm going to be an asshole right back and make that person feel unwelcome.  I'm not calling you an Axl hater or a troll, I don't see you like that.  But I do conflict with you because you tend to hate on the guys in the band as a way to defend the former members.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 02, 2009, 09:52:20 PM
Jim Bob, believe it or not, I have nothing against u at all and I guarantee we'd get a long fine in person. I don't care if u insult me either. That often happens in heated passionate debates. I don't do it because I am on the wrong side of the debate and really don't want banned or what have you.

But that one poster, I have no idea how old they are, but they just seemed to get a little attacked. younggunner and I have been on this forum a long time and can take being called cancers etc. but that one dude, I just thought it was a bit harsh.

The whole lawsuit thing, Like I said. Maybe Slash and Duff were just assholes trying to stick it to Axl. U know what, I don't know. I am just trying to throw out different scenarios as to why it may have been for an entirely different reason other than just doing it to be dicks.

Thats what I try to do on forums. I just try to lend a differing perspective to things. Just to give people a different possible way of looking at stuff. Certainly I don't feel that is being a cancer or trolling.

I think for the most part, over 30 pages or whatever, this has been heated but the mud slinging and bashing has come from your side of the fence and the Pro Axl people. *shit this sounds like one of those political threads   :hihi:



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 02, 2009, 11:33:45 PM
Because he is the one that transferred the publishing over t Sanctuary without the other guy's knowledge.

When he changed it over it was all over the press. There is no way you can say they didn't know when even WE knew.

Axl was forced to back pay them.  The checks started coming again.  They claimed it as a clerical error. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Smoking Guns on March 02, 2009, 11:35:39 PM

Also, I think its BS how Jim Bob gets a way with Insulting members who are just posting. That is really uncalled for and should be reprimanded regardless of how much he is on the Axl side of the issue.

I'm not sure who I insulted, but I know I can be a dick sometimes.

This isn't the board people usually go to when they want to have an axl v slash debate.   There are sites on the internet dedicated to that very debate.   I'm past the past and want to live in the now.  I don't really give a shit about what slash is doing or vr all that much.     So when I notice posters here who have an apparent loathing for all thing GnR post-1996, I ask them what the fuck they are doing here.

This is pretty much the only GnR board I post on these days.. why?  Because I am tired of the same tired arguments from slash fans.   I have no desire to read their opinions or thoughts, they are irrelevant now to what is going on in GnR land.   So when some Axl hater/Slash troll is posting here, I'm going to be an asshole right back and make that person feel unwelcome.  I'm not calling you an Axl hater or a troll, I don't see you like that.  But I do conflict with you because you tend to hate on the guys in the band as a way to defend the former members.

Jim Bob, you worship Finck who isn't even in the band, out side of Robin, you agree with 95% of the other people  with the exception of Slash, because Robin replaced Slash.  I have never seen such a big man crush.... :love: :rofl:  kidding.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Naltav on March 03, 2009, 12:52:15 AM
To be honest I'm getting bored arguing with you cause it's getting neither of us anywhere and is pretty pathetic really.

Exactly. When you don't have the answers, it's pathetic and the best thing to do is to pretend nothing has happened!





Now thats not what you say here:

VR did a great show and added "Bodies" as the last song which was a nice surprise. Duff and Slash seemed to be having a great time, both were smiling a lot.

VR came on and played a great show with a nice surprise at the end. A cover of The Doors' "Five To One".



So?

What's your point?

I'll spell it out for you. At the time, that's what I though.

Then I happened to see GN'R in 2006 and the reference system kinda changed.

I realized what I had been missing all those years and all the hyped substitutes didn't matter anymore!


As I said, more of the usual personal shit from you.

The wrestling fans stick together!  :yes:



/jarmo

Huh? Did I miss something? What's wrong with wrestling?   :-\

Hey Jarmo, I may have asked you before...but don't you ever get tired of the one-on-one battles with these whining babies??!

Give a whining/crying baby any attention and they will keep at it....   :crying:    :crying:    :crying:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 03, 2009, 01:10:47 AM


Jim Bob, you worship Finck who isn't even in the band, out side of Robin, you agree with 95% of the other people  with the exception of Slash, because Robin replaced Slash.  I have never seen such a big man crush.... :love: :rofl:  kidding.

just cuz robin is touring with NIN doesn't mean he's done with GnR forever.   

lets say robin for certain left the band and it was announced on his website that he was done with GnR forever, you wont see me trolling the gnr section trying to talk about him.   doesn't make me any less a fan of either him or GnR..


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slash411 on March 03, 2009, 02:20:38 AM
I know I'm going to catch hell for this but....

Why does everyone just take axl's side about it?  None of you actually know what happened and, in my opinion, they're both being HUGE babies about it.  Slash did this, Axl did that... how old are these guys?  Obviously my screen name lets you know I'm a huge slash supporter but I still respect Axl a great deal.  But to discredit Slash for his work as a guitar player?  Ouch.  I hate to do it but without him its possible Axl wouldn't be where he is today.  I guess what I really want to say is it sucks that there will never be an official reunion.  And don't get angry at me for wanting to see it, there's a reason you all started coming to the Guns N' Roses website!  And its not Robin Finck and his legendary contribution to the world of rock music...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 04:01:27 AM
Quote
I know I'm going to catch hell for this but....

Why does everyone just take axl's side about it?  None of you actually know what happened and, in my opinion, they're both being HUGE babies about it.  Slash did this, Axl did that... how old are these guys?  Obviously my screen name lets you know I'm a huge slash supporter but I still respect Axl a great deal.  But to discredit Slash for his work as a guitar player?  Ouch.  I hate to do it but without him its possible Axl wouldn't be where he is today.  I guess what I really want to say is it sucks that there will never be an official reunion.  And don't get angry at me for wanting to see it, there's a reason you all started coming to the Guns N' Roses website!  And its not Robin Finck and his legendary contribution to the world of rock music...

Nice post.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: babydolls on March 03, 2009, 04:47:01 AM
I love this ques/answer:

Why so many guitars on 'Chinese Democracy'?
Why not?

damn right! why not indeed.  It worked well and in a live setting certainly throws the punches!

cheers del and Axl for this - i was interested in what he said of the Illusions drums too as nowadays as i listen to them, the drums seem to be the least energetic instrument on there, just seem flat in comparison to everything else, maybe its the production too.  







when you have a sub-par band, you get sub-par performances. 

not saying the band or the performances were sub-par. I fkn love the illusions and I dont think any instrument or player sounds sub-par in the slightest apart from the drums.  They just don't have the same ooomph or swing as the songs deserve - but as I said before that could be how they were mixed.  I found it interesting that Axl pointed that out the drums on those albums as well.  I'd love to hear Brain or Frank tackle Locomotive for example!

His comments on Slash's recent guitar playing are fair enough - it's his opinion.  Whilst I have enjoyed seeing VR live and liked contraband - there are only a couple of tracks that I think Slash is stand-out on, and apart from the Hey Joe cover he played live a few years back - his playing hasnt been as memorable in recent years.  sad but true.

Must be sad for Axl and indeed all of them to see Steven in such a state and on a reality show - it is amazing they have all survived what they came from/went through - but steven is still a mess who doesnt mind/care about living it out in public.

Again though - cool to read a Del interview with Axl  :beer:








Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: The Glow Inc. on March 03, 2009, 05:27:33 AM
there's a reason you all started coming to the Guns N' Roses website!  And its not Robin Finck and his legendary contribution to the world of rock music...

Well, for me, that's more or less the reason...I didn't have any interest in GnR before the 06 tour and before listening to the new material. I'm probably not the only one who started listening to GnR because of Chinese Democracy ( not that I didn't know the classic songs before, I just didn't care about them ).


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 05:43:56 AM
i think he was referring to the majority though...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 03, 2009, 07:39:04 AM
as you have done with everyone else who thought Axl saying "Cancer" was too far.

Makes me wonder what these people think about One in a million, Back of Bitch, Shotgun Blues etc... :hihi:

Double standard here?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 07:55:53 AM
I guess cancer is just a touchy subject for some.  :P


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: pilferk on March 03, 2009, 08:00:38 AM
Like i said though, we don't know all the facts so really I don't know enough to give hardcore evidence.

I am just saying, people, especially when they are unable to have personal contact, talk through lawyers. Sometimes suing is the only/fastest way to get clarity of a situation.

Here's what we know:

Axl changed who administered HIS piece of the publishing rights.  FYI, he's under absolutely NO onus to officially notify anyone in the old partnership when he does that...it has nothing to do with them.  In this case, it lit off a clerical fuck up on the part of tASCAP, but.....that's not Axl's fault, nor is it his responsibility to correct it.  All he (or his representation) is required to do is make good and alert  ASCAP of the mistake.

ASCAP screwed up and sent the royalties for the other members to Sanctuary.

Who immediately noticed the fuck up and sent the checks back and notified the RIAA about what had happened.

ASCAP sat on the money and did nothing.

We KNOW that because that's what the court documents associated with the lawsuit say.  There's a TON of more than adequate documentation to that effect.

So, in other words, had the attorney's for Slash and Duff simply contacted Sanctuary's legal firm and asked the question, rather than immediately filing suit, they would have had their answer in a much less litigious, much less contentious, and probably far faster, manner.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Uber-Tech on March 03, 2009, 08:06:35 AM
His comments on Slash's recent guitar playing are fair enough - it's his opinion.  Whilst I have enjoyed seeing VR live and liked contraband - there are only a couple of tracks that I think Slash is stand-out on, and apart from the Hey Joe cover he played live a few years back - his playing hasnt been as memorable in recent years.  sad but true.

I agree.  I have nothing against the VR albums, but I also agree that his work on both Contraband and Libertad is not of the same calibre as that of his earlier work.  It must also be pointed out that, while Slash appears in many of the countdowns of various rock legends and guitar hero type charts etc, it is always a Guns song they use to illustrate the fact. 

 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: pilferk on March 03, 2009, 08:14:12 AM


Axl was forced to back pay them.  The checks started coming again.  They claimed it as a clerical error. 

Actually, it was the RIAA who was forced to back pay them....not Axl.

They just divied up the royalties correctly and sent checks.

At least, that's how I remember the ending of the case....can someone point me in the direction showing otherwise?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 08:20:21 AM
Quote
I agree.  I have nothing against the VR albums, but I also agree that his work on both Contraband and Libertad is not of the same calibre as that of his earlier work.  It must also be pointed out that, while Slash appears in many of the countdowns of various rock legends and guitar hero type charts etc, it is always a Guns song they use to illustrate the fact.


I agree, but VR were less about solo's and more of a tight knit band.  Before Scott joined VR there was footage on you tube of slash, duff and matt jamming and whatever they were playing rocked and had an awesome solo!  Hopefully it will be turned into a song one day.  But the same can be said of Axl, if there was a countdown of top singers, they would most likely use Jungle or paradise city than better or madagascar.   : ok:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: pilferk on March 03, 2009, 08:29:16 AM
I know I'm going to catch hell for this but....

Why does everyone just take axl's side about it?  None of you actually know what happened and, in my opinion, they're both being HUGE babies about it.  Slash did this, Axl did that... how old are these guys?  Obviously my screen name lets you know I'm a huge slash supporter but I still respect Axl a great deal.  But to discredit Slash for his work as a guitar player?  Ouch.  I hate to do it but without him its possible Axl wouldn't be where he is today.  I guess what I really want to say is it sucks that there will never be an official reunion.  And don't get angry at me for wanting to see it, there's a reason you all started coming to the Guns N' Roses website!  And its not Robin Finck and his legendary contribution to the world of rock music...

See, I agree with some of what Axl says...maybe not in as harsh a way as he said it, but at least the basic point.

Slash is at his absolute best when someone is challenging him.  When he's resting on his laurels....his work is good, but nowhere near as good as he's capable of.  He gets, IMHO, sort of lazy and complacent without another strong personality (the caveat being it has to also be someone he respects) pushing him/challenging him.

That's not to take away from his ability...he's an AMAZING guitar player.   And I like a LOT of his work. I mean, a LOT of people are like that....they need a bit of "stress" to be at their best, and most creative.  I don't think that makes him "bad".  MY issue is that he seems to seek out situations where he's NOT challenged...either he's too passive or the other party in the creative process is.  It's a fine line to have to walk, I know...and it's one I don't think he's walked all that consistently since leaving GnR.  There have certainly been moments that have been brilliant, but there has also been a good chunk of mediocrity...and for Slash, someone I think is as gifted a player as there is on this planet, mediocre is disappointing.

And yes, I know not everything can be stellar.  No one hits it out of the park 100% of the time.  That's not what I expect, either.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: pilferk on March 03, 2009, 08:36:48 AM


not saying the band or the performances were sub-par. I fkn love the illusions and I dont think any instrument or player sounds sub-par in the slightest apart from the drums.  They just don't have the same ooomph or swing as the songs deserve - but as I said before that could be how they were mixed.  I found it interesting that Axl pointed that out the drums on those albums as well.  I'd love to hear Brain or Frank tackle Locomotive for example!

I think you're right in assuming that's how they're mixed.  MOST of the tracks were, I think, Steven...right?  And they sound very little like the Appetite drums....so either he was so fucked up that his playing style REALLY was drastically effected, the mixing was radically different, or both.  I suspect it might be a little bit of both, but I, like you, blame the mix for most of it.  When listening to the illusions, I agree with Axl:  If ANYTHING makes the albums sound "dated", it's the style the drums are in.

Quote
His comments on Slash's recent guitar playing are fair enough - it's his opinion.  Whilst I have enjoyed seeing VR live and liked contraband - there are only a couple of tracks that I think Slash is stand-out on, and apart from the Hey Joe cover he played live a few years back - his playing hasnt been as memorable in recent years.  sad but true.

Pretty much agree.  He has moments where he really shines, so you know it's not ABILITY holding him back.  But by hook or by crook, he hasn't been consistent since leaving Guns.

Quote
Must be sad for Axl and indeed all of them to see Steven in such a state and on a reality show - it is amazing they have all survived what they came from/went through - but steven is still a mess who doesnt mind/care about living it out in public.

Again though - cool to read a Del interview with Axl  :beer:

Yeah, I get sad when I see Steven.  And then I get angry when I hear him talk or read an interview.  He's still into blaming everyone else for his problems.  Classic addict syndrome.  It's too bad, really.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 08:39:24 AM
Quote
See, I agree with some of what Axl says...maybe not in as harsh a way as he said it, but at least the basic point.

Slash is at his absolute best when someone is challenging him.  When he's resting on his laurels....his work is good, but nowhere near as good as he's capable of.  He gets, IMHO, sort of lazy and complacent without another strong personality pushing him/challenging him.

That's not to take away from his ability...he's an AMAZING guitar player.   And I like a LOT of his work. I mean, a LOT of people are like that....they need a bit of "stress" to be at their best, and most creative.  I don't think that makes him "bad".  MY issue is that he seems to seek out situations where he's NOT challenged...either he's too passive or the other party in the creative process is.  It's a fine line to have to walk, I know...and it's one I don't think he's walked all that consistently since leaving GnR.  There have certainly been moments that have been brilliant, but there has also been a good chunk of mediocrity...and for Slash, someone I think is as gifted a player as there is on this planet, mediocre is disappointing.

And yes, I know not everything can be stellar.  No one hits it out of the park 100% of the time.  That's not what I expect, either.


Spot on, everyone does need a challenege and a kick up the *ss!  Thats harder when you've already been in such a huge band though cos you have more control over what you can release etc without record companies and so on challenging you.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 08:42:44 AM
Quote
I think you're right in assuming that's how they're mixed.  MOST of the tracks were, I think, Steven...right?  And they sound very little like the Appetite drums....so either he was so fucked up that his playing style REALLY was drastically effected, the mixing was radically different, or both.  I suspect it might be a little bit of both, but I, like you, blame the mix for most of it.  When listening to the illusions, I agree with Axl:  If ANYTHING makes the albums sound "dated", it's the style the drums are in.


i think Steven only played on Civil War, and struggled to even pull it off cos he was messed up.  matt played the rest i think


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: pilferk on March 03, 2009, 08:47:30 AM
Quote
I think you're right in assuming that's how they're mixed.  MOST of the tracks were, I think, Steven...right?  And they sound very little like the Appetite drums....so either he was so fucked up that his playing style REALLY was drastically effected, the mixing was radically different, or both.  I suspect it might be a little bit of both, but I, like you, blame the mix for most of it.  When listening to the illusions, I agree with Axl:  If ANYTHING makes the albums sound "dated", it's the style the drums are in.


i think Steven only played on Civil War, and struggled to even pull it off cos he was messed up.  matt played the rest i think

You're right. Steven WROTE many of the drum tracks on illusions...not played on them.

It hit me after I posted....


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 08:51:03 AM
:)

Unfortunately i don't know enough about drumming to comment.  I will listen more carefully next time I listen to the album though and see if I can notice anything.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: pilferk on March 03, 2009, 08:56:52 AM


Spot on, everyone does need a challenege and a kick up the *ss!  Thats harder when you've already been in such a huge band though cos you have more control over what you can release etc without record companies and so on challenging you.

And the thing is...Duff and Matt are never going to be "those guys".  They're just not up to it.

Scott was never going to be "that guy".  First off, because I don't think Slash really respected him all that much.  Second, because Scott wasn't going to challenge Slash's "Alpha Wolf" status in VR...not really.  And if you don't have respect, or "leverage", you don't bring much to the "fight".

IMHO, Slash needs a guy who is going to honestly tell Slash when "the guy" thinks the shit is shit, when "the guy" thinks the gold is gold, and when "the guy" thinks the stuff Slash THINKS is shit is actually gold.  Not that Slash needs "direction" or "guidance".  That's not really it.  He just needs that challenge.  Because it makes him work harder on the stuff the other guy thinks is shit, to prove it's not, which makes it MUCH better, and it helps catch that nugget that Slash just doesn't have enough confidence in to flesh out, and motivates him to work it out.  He needs a guy who's not going to back down, and who isn't afraid to go 2 or 3 rounds of a fight over something.  Who isn't afraid to say "Fuck you" to Slash when he needs it...and who can take a "Fuck you" from Slash when it's warrented.

And, for the record, I don't think that's Axl, either.  Not any more, at least.  I think Axl played that role for awhile, to great effect.  I don't think he has it in him to do it again.  I think, ultimately, that's Axl's sort of "unspoken" reasoning behind his feelings about a reunion.  


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: suntorytime on March 03, 2009, 09:00:30 AM
Point blank words from Axl.  great read!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 09:05:45 AM
Quote
And the thing is...Duff and Matt are never going to be "those guys".  They're just not up to it.

Scott was never going to be "that guy".  First off, because I don't think Slash really respected him all that much.  Second, because Scott wasn't going to challenge Slash's "Alpha Wolf" status in VR...not really.

IMHO, Slash needs a guy who is going to honestly tell him when the shit is shit, when the gold is gold, and when the stuff Slash THINKS is shit is actually gold.  Not that Slash needs "direction" or "guidance".  He just needs that challenge.  Because it makes him work harder on the stuff the other guy thinks is shit, and it helps catch that nugget that Slash just doesn't have enough confidence in to flesh out.  He needs a guy who's not going to back down, and who isn't afraid to go 2 or 3 rounds of a fight over something.  Who isn't afraid to say "Fuck you" to Slash when he needs it...and who can take a "Fuck you" from Slash when it's warrented.

And, for the record, I don't think that's Axl, either.  Not any more, at least.  I think Axl played that role for awhile, to great effect.  I don't think he has it in him to do it again.  I think, ultimately, that's Axl's sort of "unspoken" reasoning behind his feelings about a reunion


Great points again!  I think maybe they both had this affect on each other without ever realising it.  Also, you can see how this may have caused tension and led to what we're discussing today.  I mean, i love slash but i agree that Duff, matt and perla etc, might not push him to his limits.  Maybe, his 2 young kids take them up these days! lol   :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 03, 2009, 09:17:35 AM
there's a reason you all started coming to the Guns N' Roses website!  And its not Robin Finck and his legendary contribution to the world of rock music...

Well, for me, that's more or less the reason...I didn't have any interest in GnR before the 06 tour and before listening to the new material. I'm probably not the only one who started listening to GnR because of Chinese Democracy ( not that I didn't know the classic songs before, I just didn't care about them ).

nope my friend, you aren't the only one.  :beer:

It's the current band. I wouldn't frequent a website dedicated to a dead band.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: loretian on March 03, 2009, 09:30:24 AM
Well, for me, that's more or less the reason...I didn't have any interest in GnR before the 06 tour and before listening to the new material. I'm probably not the only one who started listening to GnR because of Chinese Democracy ( not that I didn't know the classic songs before, I just didn't care about them ).

nope my friend, you aren't the only one.  :beer:

It's the current band. I wouldn't frequent a website dedicated to a dead band.

Ditto!  I tried visiting the Pink Floyd website back in '99 for a couple of months, but it got boring fast. :)  I would go so far as to say the only reason I'm a fan of Guns N' Roses is because of the song Madagascar.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AxlReznor on March 03, 2009, 10:42:15 AM


Spot on, everyone does need a challenege and a kick up the *ss!  Thats harder when you've already been in such a huge band though cos you have more control over what you can release etc without record companies and so on challenging you.

And the thing is...Duff and Matt are never going to be "those guys".  They're just not up to it.

Scott was never going to be "that guy".  First off, because I don't think Slash really respected him all that much.  Second, because Scott wasn't going to challenge Slash's "Alpha Wolf" status in VR...not really.  And if you don't have respect, or "leverage", you don't bring much to the "fight".

IMHO, Slash needs a guy who is going to honestly tell Slash when "the guy" thinks the shit is shit, when "the guy" thinks the gold is gold, and when "the guy" thinks the stuff Slash THINKS is shit is actually gold.  Not that Slash needs "direction" or "guidance".  That's not really it.  He just needs that challenge.  Because it makes him work harder on the stuff the other guy thinks is shit, to prove it's not, which makes it MUCH better, and it helps catch that nugget that Slash just doesn't have enough confidence in to flesh out, and motivates him to work it out.  He needs a guy who's not going to back down, and who isn't afraid to go 2 or 3 rounds of a fight over something.  Who isn't afraid to say "Fuck you" to Slash when he needs it...and who can take a "Fuck you" from Slash when it's warrented.

And, for the record, I don't think that's Axl, either.  Not any more, at least.  I think Axl played that role for awhile, to great effect.  I don't think he has it in him to do it again.  I think, ultimately, that's Axl's sort of "unspoken" reasoning behind his feelings about a reunion.  


I think he had "that guy" in Contraband.  And it wasn't anybody in the band, but rather the fans.  When Slash, Duff and Matt first started working together again a lot of the fans just saw it as a lame attempt at three washed-up 80's musicians to recapture some of their former glory.  When they got Scott Weiland, they were criticised by many for choosing such a loose cannon.  The criticism only heightened every time Scott was picked up by the police.  For Velvet Revolver to really be taken seriously, they absolutely had to deliver.  And I think Slash actually did push himself to come up with something fresh on that album.  It wasn't what we all expected from him... it was more modern sounding, and for the first time in years it seemed like he was actually going to different places in his playing.  The result was a huge success both critically and commercially (though obviously not as successful as GN'R, but I don't think anyone was expecting that).

Unfortunately, when it came to Libertad, he didn't have anything to prove any more.  It wasn't as vital that he did something different, so he reverted to just whatever was necessary to get the record out.  And whereas in Snakepit when he rested on his laurels, it didn't matter because he was still the best thing on the record, on Libertad you could hear some progression in Duff's playing, and even Matt did something different on the drums (a first for him).  It was this that I believe made Libertad a mediocre album, because the lead guitar just wasn't anywhere near the quality of the rest of the musicianship.  A fact that some bands can get away with, but not a band in which the lead guitar is a central part of the music.

I'm hoping that fan and critical reaction to Libertad will push Slash to realise that he can't get away with doing the bare minimum any more, and that he has to work to keep his status as one of the world's greatest guitarists.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 03, 2009, 10:44:55 AM
Ditto!  I tried visiting the Pink Floyd website back in '99 for a couple of months, but it got boring fast. :)  I would go so far as to say the only reason I'm a fan of Guns N' Roses is because of the song Madagascar.

the song is grand.
yes sometimes it takes just one song for a music lover to seriously get into a band. like falling in love at first sight.
in my case it was the title track.  I love the whole album. and I know you do too.




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 10:49:08 AM
Quote
I think he had "that guy" in Contraband.  And it wasn't anybody in the band, but rather the fans.  When Slash, Duff and Matt first started working together again a lot of the fans just saw it as a lame attempt at three washed-up 80's musicians to recapture some of their former glory.  When they got Scott Weiland, they were criticised by many for choosing such a loose cannon.  The criticism only heightened every time Scott was picked up by the police.  For Velvet Revolver to really be taken seriously, they absolutely had to deliver.  And I think Slash actually did push himself to come up with something fresh on that album.  It wasn't what we all expected from him... it was more modern sounding, and for the first time in years it seemed like he was actually going to different places in his playing.  The result was a huge success both critically and commercially (though obviously not as successful as GN'R, but I don't think anyone was expecting that).

Unfortunately, when it came to Libertad, he didn't have anything to prove any more.  It wasn't as vital that he did something different, so he reverted to just whatever was necessary to get the record out.  And whereas in Snakepit when he rested on his laurels, it didn't matter because he was still the best thing on the record, on Libertad you could hear some progression in Duff's playing, and even Matt did something different on the drums (a first for him).  It was this that I believe made Libertad a mediocre album, because the lead guitar just wasn't anywhere near the quality of the rest of the musicianship.  A fact that some bands can get away with, but not a band in which the lead guitar is a central part of the music.

I'm hoping that fan and critical reaction to Libertad will push Slash to realise that he can't get away with doing the bare minimum any more, and that he has to work to keep his status as one of the world's greatest guitarists.


Good points, although i wouldn't put it all down to Slash's playing that Libertad flopped.  I think the band kinda fell out a bit and settled for something that they knew wasn't brilliant.  Apparently, on contraband, scott was happy to do the heavier stuff like Slither but eventually he wanted to do more stuff like on Libertad.  It became more "easy listening".  Let it roll rocks though!!! 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 03, 2009, 11:08:38 AM
Quote
I think he had "that guy" in Contraband.  And it wasn't anybody in the band, but rather the fans.  When Slash, Duff and Matt first started working together again a lot of the fans just saw it as a lame attempt at three washed-up 80's musicians to recapture some of their former glory.  When they got Scott Weiland, they were criticised by many for choosing such a loose cannon.  The criticism only heightened every time Scott was picked up by the police.  For Velvet Revolver to really be taken seriously, they absolutely had to deliver.  And I think Slash actually did push himself to come up with something fresh on that album.  It wasn't what we all expected from him... it was more modern sounding, and for the first time in years it seemed like he was actually going to different places in his playing.  The result was a huge success both critically and commercially (though obviously not as successful as GN'R, but I don't think anyone was expecting that).

Unfortunately, when it came to Libertad, he didn't have anything to prove any more.  It wasn't as vital that he did something different, so he reverted to just whatever was necessary to get the record out.  And whereas in Snakepit when he rested on his laurels, it didn't matter because he was still the best thing on the record, on Libertad you could hear some progression in Duff's playing, and even Matt did something different on the drums (a first for him).  It was this that I believe made Libertad a mediocre album, because the lead guitar just wasn't anywhere near the quality of the rest of the musicianship.  A fact that some bands can get away with, but not a band in which the lead guitar is a central part of the music.

I'm hoping that fan and critical reaction to Libertad will push Slash to realise that he can't get away with doing the bare minimum any more, and that he has to work to keep his status as one of the world's greatest guitarists.


Good points, although i wouldn't put it all down to Slash's playing that Libertad flopped.  I think the band kinda fell out a bit and settled for something that they knew wasn't brilliant.  Apparently, on contraband, scott was happy to do the heavier stuff like Slither but eventually he wanted to do more stuff like on Libertad.  It became more "easy listening".  Let it roll rocks though!!! 

maybe you should find a VR board to have this discussion.

wtf?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 03, 2009, 11:11:57 AM
the thread got hijacked.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: AxlReznor on March 03, 2009, 11:16:56 AM
Quote
I think he had "that guy" in Contraband.  And it wasn't anybody in the band, but rather the fans.  When Slash, Duff and Matt first started working together again a lot of the fans just saw it as a lame attempt at three washed-up 80's musicians to recapture some of their former glory.  When they got Scott Weiland, they were criticised by many for choosing such a loose cannon.  The criticism only heightened every time Scott was picked up by the police.  For Velvet Revolver to really be taken seriously, they absolutely had to deliver.  And I think Slash actually did push himself to come up with something fresh on that album.  It wasn't what we all expected from him... it was more modern sounding, and for the first time in years it seemed like he was actually going to different places in his playing.  The result was a huge success both critically and commercially (though obviously not as successful as GN'R, but I don't think anyone was expecting that).

Unfortunately, when it came to Libertad, he didn't have anything to prove any more.  It wasn't as vital that he did something different, so he reverted to just whatever was necessary to get the record out.  And whereas in Snakepit when he rested on his laurels, it didn't matter because he was still the best thing on the record, on Libertad you could hear some progression in Duff's playing, and even Matt did something different on the drums (a first for him).  It was this that I believe made Libertad a mediocre album, because the lead guitar just wasn't anywhere near the quality of the rest of the musicianship.  A fact that some bands can get away with, but not a band in which the lead guitar is a central part of the music.

I'm hoping that fan and critical reaction to Libertad will push Slash to realise that he can't get away with doing the bare minimum any more, and that he has to work to keep his status as one of the world's greatest guitarists.


Good points, although i wouldn't put it all down to Slash's playing that Libertad flopped.  I think the band kinda fell out a bit and settled for something that they knew wasn't brilliant.  Apparently, on contraband, scott was happy to do the heavier stuff like Slither but eventually he wanted to do more stuff like on Libertad.  It became more "easy listening".  Let it roll rocks though!!! 

maybe you should find a VR board to have this discussion.

wtf?

Sorry.  Saw a series of posts that interested me and put in my own thoughts.  Shutting up now...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 11:21:46 AM
Sorry guys, the conversation just happened to turn this way without giving it much thought. :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: slashsbaconpit on March 03, 2009, 11:28:44 AM
Here's my thoughts.

First, I agree with whoever said they are both babies about it. But it's the fans' fault to. We're the ones, well not me or Jarmo particularly, but it's the fans who keep asking about Slash, and a reunion with old Guns and what happened. Shit, that was like 15 years ago or so that the old band fell apart. Does it even matter? I mean, anytime someone is asked about it, they're going to sound like a baby whining about the past. It's inherent in the questions. They probably wouldn't address it if not for us bugging them about it, and we've heard all this before. The past is the past, let it rest. These guys are never going to work together again, so let's just drop it already.

Second, I liked both VR albums, but as I listen to them, its Scott's work that stands out to me the most. Not Slash's, which is kinda ironic, because he was supposed to be the big draw on the album. Duff and Matt both did fine jobs as well, but yeah, Slash's hooks just weren't what they could have been overall. I mean, people bitch about the new line-up because there's no Slash, but even Slash doesn't play like Slash anymore.

Third, I thought it was funny when he said people are already pestering him about a release date for the next album. I think it's pretty clear they're won't be a next album ... not for a while anyway.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 03, 2009, 11:36:59 AM
I thought it was Scott that most people didnt like?  He doesn't really have the pipes which also has a huge affect on what a lead guitarist can do.

Anyways, lets keep this GNR based!


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Uber-Tech on March 03, 2009, 12:04:16 PM
people are already pestering him about a release date for the next album.

Some people are just never satisfied, no matter what the man does.  They can't seem to appreciate how hard this band have worked to get Chinese out.  Personally, given all the shit that both Axl and the band went through in making the album, I don't think they'll be running into any recording studios in the near future.

I hope they'll go on tour, I hope they'll release another album, but at the end of the day, I have the album I waited half my life for.  It's an amazing album, and has made me very happy. If Guns don't want to give anything more than they already have done, then so be it. 



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 03, 2009, 02:03:35 PM
Even though I think Contraband fucking rocks like a motherfucker, I absolutely 100 percent agree that Slash is at his best when someone is pushing him. I have said that for years.

now, to say his VR work is subpar, I don't agree with. His Libertad work, Ok, I give u that, but CB fucking Rocks like hell so I don't agree with that assessment 100 percent.


This is where shit is going to get touchy and if u are not mature enough to handle, stop reading now ok cause I don't want  a fucking net war over what I am about to say:


I feel Axl is not challenged on Chinese Democracy guitar wise.


The ballads are fucking AWESOME on Chinese Democracy, I mean just amazing amazing stuff, I don't have enough Adjectives to properly heap praise on how great the ballads are.

The rock stuff however.............. That is where CD fails in my opinion. Scraped is kick ass, but honestly, none of the other rockers give me any sort of adrenaline rush.

So basically, when I am running at the gym or hitting the weights, I prefer Contraband.

When I just want to be taking on a musical journey or am feeling down etc, Chinese is one of the greatest albums ever.




Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: damnthehaters on March 03, 2009, 02:23:45 PM
Even though I think Contraband fucking rocks like a motherfucker, I absolutely 100 percent agree that Slash is at his best when someone is pushing him. I have said that for years.

now, to say his VR work is subpar, I don't agree with. His Libertad work, Ok, I give u that, but CB fucking Rocks like hell so I don't agree with that assessment 100 percent.


This is where shit is going to get touchy and if u are not mature enough to handle, stop reading now ok cause I don't want  a fucking net war over what I am about to say:


I feel Axl is not challenged on Chinese Democracy guitar wise.


The ballads are fucking AWESOME on Chinese Democracy, I mean just amazing amazing stuff, I don't have enough Adjectives to properly heap praise on how great the ballads are.

The rock stuff however.............. That is where CD fails in my opinion. Scraped is kick ass, but honestly, none of the other rockers give me any sort of adrenaline rush.

So basically, when I am running at the gym or hitting the weights, I prefer Contraband.

When I just want to be taking on a musical journey or am feeling down etc, Chinese is one of the greatest albums ever.




I agree to some extent, but I think Shacklers Revenge is one of GNR's hardest, heaviest, and blood pumping songs to date. 


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: norway on March 03, 2009, 02:36:06 PM
I agree to some extent, but I think Shacklers Revenge is one of GNR's hardest, heaviest, and blood pumping songs to date. 

Thats my favorite too.

I guess when it comes to the "being pushed" thing, that can go both ways, but art is so subjective. :peace:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 03, 2009, 02:38:33 PM
contraband is a fucking terd and why is it still a topic of discussion here?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: D on March 03, 2009, 02:45:12 PM
OOPS my omission and I really apologize cause I do fucking love Shackler's Revenge. Thanks for the correction.


Jim Bob

All of this convo is relevant because it falls under Axl's interview where he talks about Slash's playing since GNR.



Also let me preface what I said above by saying, I don't hate the rockers, I mean they are good, but they don't, outside of Scraped and Shackler's, give me that push on the gas pedal, kick my speed into high gear while running adrenaline boost.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 03, 2009, 03:05:20 PM
Better, Riad and Scraped alone shits all over any VR rocker IMHO.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Limulus on March 03, 2009, 03:19:04 PM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 03, 2009, 03:45:08 PM
Better, Riad and Scraped alone shits all over any VR rocker IMHO.

I agree 100 percent !


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Skunk on March 03, 2009, 03:45:13 PM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

Axl would improve those songs, but they still wouldn't stand up to the material on CD. Slither is probably the standard for contraband, and Better for CD... Better wins i think. Slither has a great groove, and like most VR i think it stands a lot on Weiland's vocal melody, which is great, but for a similar and better melody look no further than Shacklers.

EDIT: also, i don't think it's fair to expect Axl to move on when the public has not. He has to answer these questions, because anyone interviewing him has to ask them. They'd be a crap journalist if they didn't. It may be that Axl is very much at peace with it, having just released the album he wanted with musicians he respects. But having moved on doesn't mean he has to change his opinion. He doesn't like the guy, and he has his reasons. There are people i didn't like a long time ago, don't think of much now, but if you asked me my opinion, it wouldn't suddenly be higher. In short, just because some people love Slash, doesn't mean Axl has to be one of them.


I feel Axl is not challenged on Chinese Democracy guitar wise.


The ballads are fucking AWESOME on Chinese Democracy, I mean just amazing amazing stuff, I don't have enough Adjectives to properly heap praise on how great the ballads are.

The rock stuff however.............. That is where CD fails in my opinion. Scraped is kick ass, but honestly, none of the other rockers give me any sort of adrenaline rush.

So basically, when I am running at the gym or hitting the weights, I prefer Contraband.

When I just want to be taking on a musical journey or am feeling down etc, Chinese is one of the greatest albums ever.



If you get more of an adrenaline rush from VR style songs that's cool, but CD fails on the rock stuff??  ::)
The CD to Shacklers combo and then the Scraped to Riad combo on the same album is amazing. Maybe you're just looking for something more up-tempo. I get your point about the different styles of music, and about CD being a journey... and i think that's something that doesn't get talked about enough. Chinese Democracy is an incredible accomplishment in that it is a complete and coherent album where each song is totally unique and yet the sum is still greater than the parts. In that sense it's more like Appetite than any other.

I also think it's pretty silly to say Axl isn't challenged on CD guitar-wise. I don't even know where to begin. There are a lot of exceptional guitars on the album, rockers and ballads.



To bring it back to Axl's interview... I think what he was largely saying was that Slash hasn't done much post-GNR that strikes him as inspired. The "passion and dedication to the art" and that certain "energy." Regardless of what songs anyone likes or dislikes, i think that's a totally fair criticism. I also think what Axl was describing is something you can find in the work of the guitarists on CD. In many ways it's an intangible thing, a feeling or a freshness to something. A life in it, the same way that a vocalist can sing a song at one time in their career and it really hits, and then later it can feel stale or unmoving. Axl was even clear to say he didn't want to take away from the past, and that he wasn't talking about style or technique. So if we want to talk about Slash, let's talk about that... do we really think his post-GNR work sounds as inspired and alive, as passionate and energetic, as it used to? And do we think it stands in that same way with the work on CD? IMHO Axl is spot on.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Naltav on March 03, 2009, 04:31:46 PM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

My first reaction was like that. That it was harsh and bitter. But after thinking about it, I think it's more like Axl is going; "Ok, it's time to KILL this subject once and for all..."'

It's like he's shooting down the subject in these first interviews. So that, down the line, people/journalists/fans will start to finally understand that; 'well, no need to go there....'    ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 03, 2009, 04:35:46 PM
Even though he said those things, some still refuse to give the idea a rest.

So imagine if he had used words that weren't that "strong"...




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 03, 2009, 04:46:13 PM
People are indeed refusing, but it's kinda obvious why... How else they could acuse Axl of offending their holy old material?


ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

Axl would improve those songs, but they still wouldn't stand up to the material on CD. Slither is probably the standard for contraband, and Better for CD... Better wins i think. Slither has a great groove, and like most VR i think it stands a lot on Weiland's vocal melody, which is great, but for a similar and better melody look no further than Shacklers.

EDIT: also, i don't think it's fair to expect Axl to move on when the public has not. He has to answer these questions, because anyone interviewing him has to ask them. They'd be a crap journalist if they didn't. It may be that Axl is very much at peace with it, having just released the album he wanted with musicians he respects. But having moved on doesn't mean he has to change his opinion. He doesn't like the guy, and he has his reasons. There are people i didn't like a long time ago, don't think of much now, but if you asked me my opinion, it wouldn't suddenly be higher. In short, just because some people love Slash, doesn't mean Axl has to be one of them.


I feel Axl is not challenged on Chinese Democracy guitar wise.


The ballads are fucking AWESOME on Chinese Democracy, I mean just amazing amazing stuff, I don't have enough Adjectives to properly heap praise on how great the ballads are.

The rock stuff however.............. That is where CD fails in my opinion. Scraped is kick ass, but honestly, none of the other rockers give me any sort of adrenaline rush.

So basically, when I am running at the gym or hitting the weights, I prefer Contraband.

When I just want to be taking on a musical journey or am feeling down etc, Chinese is one of the greatest albums ever.



If you get more of an adrenaline rush from VR style songs that's cool, but CD fails on the rock stuff??  ::)
The CD to Shacklers combo and then the Scraped to Riad combo on the same album is amazing. Maybe you're just looking for something more up-tempo. I get your point about the different styles of music, and about CD being a journey... and i think that's something that doesn't get talked about enough. Chinese Democracy is an incredible accomplishment in that it is a complete and coherent album where each song is totally unique and yet the sum is still greater than the parts. In that sense it's more like Appetite than any other.

I also think it's pretty silly to say Axl isn't challenged on CD guitar-wise. I don't even know where to begin. There are a lot of exceptional guitars on the album, rockers and ballads.



To bring it back to Axl's interview... I think what he was largely saying was that Slash hasn't done much post-GNR that strikes him as inspired. The "passion and dedication to the art" and that certain "energy." Regardless of what songs anyone likes or dislikes, i think that's a totally fair criticism. I also think what Axl was describing is something you can find in the work of the guitarists on CD. In many ways it's an intangible thing, a feeling or a freshness to something. A life in it, the same way that a vocalist can sing a song at one time in their career and it really hits, and then later it can feel stale or unmoving. Axl was even clear to say he didn't want to take away from the past, and that he wasn't talking about style or technique. So if we want to talk about Slash, let's talk about that... do we really think his post-GNR work sounds as inspired and alive, as passionate and energetic, as it used to? And do we think it stands in that same way with the work on CD? IMHO Axl is spot on.
You couldn't have said it better. It's exactly my feelings.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Rose Democracy on March 03, 2009, 04:51:21 PM
Even though he said those things, some still refuse to give the idea a rest.

So imagine if he had used words that weren't that "strong"...




/jarmo

Totally agree. There are some words that are necesary to say to make visible what you want.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Naltav on March 03, 2009, 05:07:47 PM
Even though he said those things, some still refuse to give the idea a rest.

So imagine if he had used words that weren't that "strong"...




/jarmo

Well if this doesn't kill their hopes.... What will?   :-\


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 03, 2009, 05:28:40 PM
Even though he said those things, some still refuse to give the idea a rest.

So imagine if he had used words that weren't that "strong"...




/jarmo



Well if this doesn't kill their hopes.... What will?   :-\

When the new band keeps playing and playing and playing.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Limulus on March 03, 2009, 05:50:06 PM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

Axl would improve those songs, but they still wouldn't stand up to the material on CD. Slither is probably the standard for contraband, and Better for CD... Better wins i think. Slither has a great groove, and like most VR i think it stands a lot on Weiland's vocal melody, which is great, but for a similar and better melody look no further than Shacklers.

EDIT: also, i don't think it's fair to expect Axl to move on when the public has not. He has to answer these questions, because anyone interviewing him has to ask them. They'd be a crap journalist if they didn't. It may be that Axl is very much at peace with it, having just released the album he wanted with musicians he respects. But having moved on doesn't mean he has to change his opinion. He doesn't like the guy, and he has his reasons. There are people i didn't like a long time ago, don't think of much now, but if you asked me my opinion, it wouldn't suddenly be higher. In short, just because some people love Slash, doesn't mean Axl has to be one of them.


if you read my words exactly i've used the words "i hope he can move on now....". unlike some posters here trying to command others "to move on" on a daily basis on this board the word hope -in the sense i am using it- includes some positive message like finding a way out of the dark. actually thats what i honestly wish him for feeling better in all his nightmares he seems to have still.
now all the old Guns talking (instead of much more focussing on the shortly released album) by the main man is trying to be excused with some kind of statement he had to do as if it never appears again but fans arent allowed to do so but should "move on".....tricky, huh? you can also just take it for what it is: Axl mostly talking about the old band as part of his version in this interview.
nevertheless whatever the real intentions are to openly talk that bitter about that classic guitar player doesnt mean we arent allowed to say it sounds bitter....which it simply does.
what even bothers me some more that this board rarely does allow the postings of some of Axl's targets....lately Alan Niven and Robert John. they have their versions aswell and all the right to defend themselves.

and your answer on the VR songs is very subjective, exspecially with comparing to cd. when staying that subjective my point would be those 3 songs could have been killer songs IF they would have worked together on them and would be better than most if not all the cd songs, thats my subjective view.
but trying to stay more objective i think many would agree that Axl working and singing on them would improve those songs, probably even a lot.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 03, 2009, 05:55:59 PM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

Axl would improve those songs, but they still wouldn't stand up to the material on CD. Slither is probably the standard for contraband, and Better for CD... Better wins i think. Slither has a great groove, and like most VR i think it stands a lot on Weiland's vocal melody, which is great, but for a similar and better melody look no further than Shacklers.

EDIT: also, i don't think it's fair to expect Axl to move on when the public has not. He has to answer these questions, because anyone interviewing him has to ask them. They'd be a crap journalist if they didn't. It may be that Axl is very much at peace with it, having just released the album he wanted with musicians he respects. But having moved on doesn't mean he has to change his opinion. He doesn't like the guy, and he has his reasons. There are people i didn't like a long time ago, don't think of much now, but if you asked me my opinion, it wouldn't suddenly be higher. In short, just because some people love Slash, doesn't mean Axl has to be one of them.


if you read my words exactly i've used the words "i hope he can move on now....". unlike some posters here trying to command others "to move on" on a daily basis on this board the word hope -in the sense i am using it- includes some positive message like finding a way out of the dark. actually thats what i honestly wish him for feeling better in all his nightmares he seems to have still.
now all the old Guns talking (instead of much more focussing on the shortly released album) by the main man is trying to be excused with some kind of statement he had to do as if it never appears again but fans arent allowed to do so but should "move on".....tricky, huh? you can also just take it for what it is: Axl mostly talking about the old band as part of his version in this interview.
nevertheless whatever the real intentions are to openly talk that bitter about that classic guitar player doesnt mean we arent allowed to say it sounds bitter....which it simply does.
what even bothers me some more that this board rarely does allow the postings of some of Axl's targets....lately Alan Niven and Robert John. they have their versions aswell and all the right to defend themselves.

and your answer on the VR songs is very subjective, exspecially with comparing to cd. when staying that subjective my point would be those 3 songs could have been killer songs IF they would have worked together on them and would be better than most if not all the cd songs, thats my subjective view.
but trying to stay more objective i think many would agree that Axl working and singing on them would improve those songs, probably even a lot.



The fact is those are VR songs not GnR songs.  It dumb to say well if Axl sang on Slither and Fall to pieces they would be killer, that's all hearsay ! too much wishing going on this topic.  Be happy Axl and the band put out a CD that is ten times better than CB and liberturd put together.  If all you Slash fans disagree with me ! PM me don't waste your time, clustering up this topic about how you wish your top hat hero was still in the band.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Limulus on March 03, 2009, 06:11:51 PM
my basic talking was about Axl's latest interview(s) which is what this topic should be about. but nice subjective reply and interpretation in the post from "GNR4L" above.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Naltav on March 03, 2009, 06:33:57 PM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

My first reaction was like that. That it was harsh and bitter. But after thinking about it, I think it's more like Axl is going; "Ok, it's time to KILL this subject once and for all..."'

It's like he's shooting down the subject in these first interviews. So that, down the line, people/journalists/fans will start to finally understand that; 'well, no need to go there....'    ;)

Hmmm, looking at the new main headline on gunsnroses.com, I gues that's the message he's trying to get across...

Hope some of you people get it.... you know who you are....   ;)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: dyd on March 03, 2009, 07:06:07 PM
Quote
The rehearsals with [Dave] Abruzzesse and Pod as a duo were really cool


who is Pod  ???


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNRFAN20 on March 03, 2009, 07:23:47 PM
I think Axl will be doing more interviews this year to get out his thoughts.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 03, 2009, 07:40:46 PM
Quote
The rehearsals with [Dave] Abruzzesse and Pod as a duo were really cool


who is Pod  ???


who's pod?


My guess is Chris Vrenna....

 :)



/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: MeanBone on March 03, 2009, 07:48:48 PM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jarmo on March 03, 2009, 07:53:40 PM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...

After they got rid off that ham handed drummer.

1996-1997 I believe.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: KIKO2K6 on March 03, 2009, 09:48:48 PM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...

After they got rid off that ham handed drummer.

1996-1997 I believe.




/jarmo

You mean the Jack ass   A.K.A Matt Sorum ?! :hihi:



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 03, 2009, 11:27:06 PM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...

After they got rid off that ham handed drummer.

1996-1997 I believe.




/jarmo

You mean the Jack ass   A.K.A Matt Sorum ?! :hihi:



matt scrotum?


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 03, 2009, 11:31:17 PM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...

After they got rid off that ham handed drummer.

1996-1997 I believe.




/jarmo

You mean the Jack ass   A.K.A Matt Sorum ?! :hihi:



matt scrotum?
I never liked that guy.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Jim Bob on March 03, 2009, 11:36:03 PM
Brain and Frank are both far superior.  That is for sure.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 03, 2009, 11:39:17 PM
Brain and Frank are both far superior.  That is for sure.
I totally agree and they are not so sleazy.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: lynn1961 on March 04, 2009, 12:39:09 AM
ever imagined Axl working and singing on "Suckertrain Blues", "Slither" or "Falling To Pieces"?

his interview -again- sounds bitter and harsh in many ways, exspecially the hatred regarding to Slash. this surely must have been something he finally needed to get out of his chest, hope he feels better now and can move on.

My first reaction was like that. That it was harsh and bitter. But after thinking about it, I think it's more like Axl is going; "Ok, it's time to KILL this subject once and for all..."'

It's like he's shooting down the subject in these first interviews. So that, down the line, people/journalists/fans will start to finally understand that; 'well, no need to go there....'    ;)

Could be.  I think it's unlikely to happen, though.  People/journalists/fans will still go there.   It's a subject that will probably come up in interviews for a long time to come.  I think it will take a long time to kill the subject once and for all.   


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layne Staley's Sunglasses on March 04, 2009, 01:34:51 AM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...

After they got rid off that ham handed drummer.

1996-1997 I believe.




/jarmo

You mean the Jack ass   A.K.A Matt Sorum ?! :hihi:



matt scrotum?

One more, one more!  ;D

Matt Bore 'em Sorum!

 :beer:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: GNR4L on March 04, 2009, 01:53:13 AM
when were they in gnr? i never heard of that before the interview... footage of those rehearsals or recordings should be priceless...

After they got rid off that ham handed drummer.

1996-1997 I believe.




/jarmo

You mean the Jack ass   A.K.A Matt Sorum ?! :hihi:



matt scrotum?

One more, one more!  ;D

Matt Bore 'em Sorum!

 :beer:

He's a Dillweed.  :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: jacdaniel on March 04, 2009, 03:21:24 AM
Quote
don't waste your time, clustering up this topic about how you wish your top hat hero was still in the band.


Don't think anybody really wants this. :)


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layflats on March 04, 2009, 08:47:36 AM
Quote
Outside of the impossible bucket/bumble solos though, the rock riffs are pretty basic is what I am getting at.

I think this is an oversimplification and I'll challenge it from a musical standpoint.

Take a song like Better. Though the single chords and riffs are pretty basic, I dare you to analyze the rhythm and syncopation.  Riads is another prime example of this.  You could learn the chords and riffs if you single them out, but try and work out the timing of them within a band structure; it would take a long while.  This is what happens when you work with really great drummers.  When I first learned that Brain was on this album, I wanted it even more, because I had some knowledge of his playing with Primus and other projects with Bucket.  He is not only studied, but has the flair and attitude needed to be a Gunner.

Axl's genius moves on this album were finding a level headed, solid bassist, drummers with full knowledge of syncopation and that could also hit hard, and of course recruiting some of the most inventive guitarists in the biz today.  Pitman is the icing on the cake sonically.  Reed is just flat out a good keyboard player and the use of piano is the real difference maker between AFD leading up to CD.

This is why the touring end is going to be a huge challenge, because these musicians have and had a lot going for them outside of Gn'R.  You just have to hope the stars align where the majority of the players on the album can commit 100%.  You really want these guys because they had stake in writing the material, and that in itself raises your performance level.  There is no feeling like getting a crowd off on something you create.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Voodoochild on March 04, 2009, 09:21:56 AM
^ I agree with you, but there's some just small tidbits..

Take a song like Better. Though the single chords and riffs are pretty basic, I dare you to analyze the rhythm and syncopation. 
True but, again, I don't think the riff and chords are pretty basic. A lot of people misheard it as simple, but in fact they are some cool and intricated stuff which uses a lot of the dynamics of dissonation (sp?) and the harmonics of the distortion. Not quite simple as many put it on almost all the TABs and YouTube recordings.

Riads is another prime example of this.  You could learn the chords and riffs if you single them out, but try and work out the timing of them within a band structure; it would take a long while. 
Very true. Also, Riad's riffs in the first part are kinda different from the second part (which has wicked funky wha guitar in the background). And the chorus has some really nice chords along with Robin's riffs (and also some licks by Bumblefoot).

This is what happens when you work with really great drummers.  When I first learned that Brain was on this album, I wanted it even more, because I had some knowledge of his playing with Primus and other projects with Bucket.  He is not only studied, but has the flair and attitude needed to be a Gunner.
True too, but let's not forget Josh Freese - who arranged the best drumming on the album in Riad and TWAT.



Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Layflats on March 04, 2009, 09:46:49 AM
Quote
in fact they are some cool and intricated stuff which uses a lot of the dynamics of dissonation (sp?) and the harmonics of the distortion.
Quote
True too, but let's not forget Josh Freese - who arranged the best drumming on the album in Riad and TWAT.

Hell Yeah!  Nice to know someone on the board thinks about this type of stuff.  I really appreciate your take on this.

Josh Freese is in the same boat as Ron Thal for me prior to picking up the album, someone I knew nothing about.  I'll take some time to check out his history.  The stuff I'm learning about Ron has up'd my respect for his playing immensely.

Thanks Voodoo!

*** BTW, just did my Freese homework and *gulp*.  The Vandals, A Perfect Circle, NIN, fucking DEVO!!!  This guy is off the chain!  He reminds me of Steven Perkins from Jane's Addiction.  SLAMMIN!***


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 04, 2009, 10:04:28 AM
Quote
He is not only studied, but has the flair and attitude needed to be a Gunner.

In addition, brain's got a sick sense of humour and fun.  :-*

about those who try to put down the album, don't waste your words on them.  

like axl says if you don't like cd, then you probably won't like the succeeding ones.





Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Skunk on March 05, 2009, 02:34:59 AM
Layflats and Voodoo -- great posts!


I always thought the songwriting and musicianship on CD walks a brilliantly fine line. There's so much talent on display and yet there's a seeminly conscious effort to channel that into a straight rock record, pop sensibility and all. The songs are so unique, and there's so much in them, and yet there also tight as hell. Almost every song suits a passive listener just as well as an active listener, and i think that comes from the incredible talent of the band coupled with the effort we all know went into making it right. CD is a statement in so many ways.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: audjon on March 14, 2009, 12:29:11 PM
This part of the interview still puzzles me.


Del James: As reported, were you, either in your mind or otherwise, trying to create the "best album ever made"?

Axl Rose: No. That's f---ing ridiculous and more negative media nonsense. We were all just trying to do our best for the fans and ourselves.

At any point did you feel or say either you or the band had to make a "masterpiece"?

Of course not -- more unaccountable nonsense. Obviously, media, elements of the public, fans and our detractors had all kinds of things going on such as high hopes, expectations, pressure, naysayers, etc. I don't think anyone would mind discovering a diamond mine and I don't think anyone in any competitive field would get very far if they didn't have dreams, aspirations or simply hope to do well. That said, these types of comments are more from our detractors, pulled out of their ass if not thin air.

Why this lack of ambition? I just can't understand it. All those years, why didn't he try to make each song great, add a little guitar fill here or there, maybe even add an orchestra, a choir or even a harp to various songs, maybe double the guitar sound by having more than two guitar players.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: Annie on March 14, 2009, 01:24:59 PM
This part of the interview still puzzles me.


Del James: As reported, were you, either in your mind or otherwise, trying to create the "best album ever made"?

Axl Rose: No. That's f---ing ridiculous and more negative media nonsense. We were all just trying to do our best for the fans and ourselves.

At any point did you feel or say either you or the band had to make a "masterpiece"?

Of course not -- more unaccountable nonsense. Obviously, media, elements of the public, fans and our detractors had all kinds of things going on such as high hopes, expectations, pressure, naysayers, etc. I don't think anyone would mind discovering a diamond mine and I don't think anyone in any competitive field would get very far if they didn't have dreams, aspirations or simply hope to do well. That said, these types of comments are more from our detractors, pulled out of their ass if not thin air.

Why this lack of ambition? I just can't understand it. All those years, why didn't he try to make each song great, add a little guitar fill here or there, maybe even add an orchestra, a choir or even a harp to various songs, maybe double the guitar sound by having more than two guitar players.
Each song is great. Uncle Axl is just showing a little humility.


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: greekmule on March 14, 2009, 01:30:36 PM
This part of the interview still puzzles me.


Del James: As reported, were you, either in your mind or otherwise, trying to create the "best album ever made"?

Axl Rose: No. That's f---ing ridiculous and more negative media nonsense. We were all just trying to do our best for the fans and ourselves.

At any point did you feel or say either you or the band had to make a "masterpiece"?

Of course not -- more unaccountable nonsense. Obviously, media, elements of the public, fans and our detractors had all kinds of things going on such as high hopes, expectations, pressure, naysayers, etc. I don't think anyone would mind discovering a diamond mine and I don't think anyone in any competitive field would get very far if they didn't have dreams, aspirations or simply hope to do well. That said, these types of comments are more from our detractors, pulled out of their ass if not thin air.

Why this lack of ambition? I just can't understand it. All those years, why didn't he try to make each song great, add a little guitar fill here or there, maybe even add an orchestra, a choir or even a harp to various songs, maybe double the guitar sound by having more than two guitar players.

audjon, is this comment tongue in cheek? cause obviously he tried to do all to do all of these...

anyway for me this one was one of Axl's best answers in the interview; mature, real and humble. :peace:


Title: Re: Axl Rose Interview With Del James
Post by: ppbebe on March 14, 2009, 01:44:36 PM
All those years, why didn't he try to make each song great, add a little guitar fill here or there, maybe even add an orchestra, a choir or even a harp to various songs, maybe double the guitar sound by having more than two guitar players.

audjon, is this comment tongue in cheek? cause obviously he tried to do all to do all of these...

obviously it is.  :hihi:

I like this bit.
"We were all just trying to do our best for the fans and ourselves."

Why thank you.  :peace: whatever axl says, for me cd is a masterpiece and the best album so far.