Here Today... Gone To Hell!

 :peace:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e07_1207211047

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=76d_1207190801

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=569_1207165887

 :peace:

I saw him on Larry King last, he as awesome.

I like his style and opinions.. not so sure about his haircut though :peace:

haha, I almost typed that. That hair was something else... :hihi:

Hah...haven't seen Jesse is years. He was a helluva a character though as gov out here.

The best WWE/WWF color man ever.    :yes:

He's a 'truther' too.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=76d_1207190801

 :peace:

*sigh*....  The buildings did NOT fall at the speed of gravity...  The steel girders did NOT have to melt.... 

This guy might have some good points, but he should at least do some very basic homework and not get caught up in the whole "out there" conspiracy thing.

"No wreckage outside the pentagon", "engines completely disappeared". 

Whatever....   

I think the more time goes by, the more people will begin to believe the conspiracy theories. I don't 100% believe either side of it. I think it's very possible that the government was in cahoots with the terrorists. I don't believe the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. And I do believe that it was actual Saudi terrorists flying the planes rather than the conspiracy theorist claim that it was some kind of expert U.S. military people doing it. But why in bloody hell was NORAD running terrorist drills on the same day that a terrorist attack happens? And why in the hell was George W. Bush's brother head of security for the twin towers up until the morning of 9/11? We were conveniently vulnerable during those NORAD drills. The Bush administration gained more from 9/11 than anyone else other than the weapons manufacturers that made a shitload of cash on our policies in response to it (including Iraq). There's a quote from Cheney long before 9/11 in which he admitted that they needed another Pearl Harbor in order to create support for their neo-conservative agenda particularly overseas. I think the more time goes by and the more people actually think about it, the more likely that some of the conspiracy theories will become part of the general public's opinion. There's already quite a few people overseas that don't believe the government's official story, and as I said, the more time goes by, the more Americans will stop believing the junk that's been spoon-fed to us about it.

I agree with pretty much everything you said.   I just don't believe that having "celebrities" espousing these theories using information that is easy to disprove is the right way.  It doesn't build credibility. 

There are loads of unanswered questions.  Nobody should focus on the lame theories like "there was no wreckage" or "the buildings fell at freefall speed" or "the fire wasn't hot enough" etc. 

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Maddox has released a lot of interesting research about 9/11 too.

He has some great points. Especially about overthrowing Saddam.

(http://blogs.trb.com/news/politics/blog/aP1010036-thumb.JPG)

Here Blutarsky, for you :peace:


(http://kaganof.com/kagablog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/sheep_tv.jpg)

The 9/11 conspiracy theory ( extreme paranoia)  is bullshit and a bit tired.

I do like a lot about Ventura, but some of his views I don't agree with at all....