Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Off Topic => Bad Obsession => Topic started by: CheapJon on April 30, 2007, 06:44:45 AM



Title: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: CheapJon on April 30, 2007, 06:44:45 AM
maybe the 2 most hated genres in RnR (at least among metalheads and shit, if u want u can throw in grunge too :hihi:)

if u have to chose one of 'em wich would u take and why? do u hate them? everything about em.. best bands in both genres?


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: Skeletor on April 30, 2007, 06:49:16 AM
Well, Korn is a fairly good band for a nu-metal act. Especially their debut album still rocks to this day. As for emo, can't say I've heard much of that stuff... Maybe it's because I don't listen to the radio :)


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: mrlee on April 30, 2007, 07:02:42 AM
nu metal over emo anyday, at least people didnt dress like manufactured turds when they were into nu-metal.

plus, if it wasnt for nu metal i wouldnt have gotten into any forms of metal or rock...hell knows where i would be!


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: PJ on April 30, 2007, 10:11:26 AM
at least there were some nu metal credible bands


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: GeraldFord on April 30, 2007, 10:16:20 AM
Not really a fan of either, but KORN's later work was okay, and I like the first two Biskit albums.


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: Mysteron on April 30, 2007, 03:28:17 PM
I like Weezer

I know Slipknot and Korn well, but I have never been overly impressed with their output




Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: Axlfreek on April 30, 2007, 03:34:02 PM
I hate both of them, but if i had to choose i would pick nu-metal over emo.


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: GNRreunioneventually on April 30, 2007, 05:54:04 PM
i choose neither they both suck and everyone who like them should die or be taken to a concentration camp :rant:


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: SLCPUNK on May 01, 2007, 02:11:06 AM
Not crazy about either one..... :P


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: freedom78 on May 02, 2007, 02:08:58 AM
Hmm...untalented jackasses, hopping around, ruining the name of metal and trying to act tougher than they really are.

OR

Untalented jackasses, two-toning their hair, ruining the name of rock n' roll and trying to be emotional and sensitive.

I honestly can't decide.


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: GNR_Green on May 06, 2007, 02:10:50 PM
Horse shit or donkey shit?


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: Lara on May 06, 2007, 02:13:37 PM
What do you consider nu-metal? If it's Korn, NIN, Tool then hell YEAH!


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: freedom78 on May 06, 2007, 05:02:20 PM
What do you consider nu-metal? If it's Korn, NIN, Tool then hell YEAH!

NIN isn't nu-metal, by my estimation, and neither is Tool. 


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: Lara on May 06, 2007, 05:12:02 PM
What do you consider nu-metal? If it's Korn, NIN, Tool then hell YEAH!

NIN isn't nu-metal, by my estimation, and neither is Tool. 

What are they?


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: CheapJon on May 06, 2007, 05:20:45 PM
What do you consider nu-metal? If it's Korn, NIN, Tool then hell YEAH!

NIN isn't nu-metal, by my estimation, and neither is Tool.?

What are they?

IMO more industrial-progressive rock


Title: Re: Nu-Metal VS. EMO
Post by: mrlee on May 06, 2007, 07:05:04 PM
What do you consider nu-metal? If it's Korn, NIN, Tool then hell YEAH!

NIN isn't nu-metal, by my estimation, and neither is Tool. 

What are they?

NIN is industrial

Tool are just crap (in the boring sense)