Here Today... Gone To Hell!

the other thread is already a dead horse, why close it down? ;D

chill out man, as I said before, you're only puncturing your own liver  : ok:

Dead Horse is for GN'R, this section is for VR.

If you don't wanna talk about VR and feel the need to bring GN'R into this section, that's fine with me.


Funny how you're so concerned all of a sudden.

Just look up who mentioned GN'R first.....  : ok:




/jarmo

I just want to say one thing:


Now that's the spirit! ;D

Now if we can only get acceptance for the idea that we don't need VR threads on a GN'R board, now THAT'S the idea! :beer:

Loved the way you locked the other thread so you could ensure you had the last word, Jarmo. Didn't strike me as pathetic at all!

Just wondering, what did you mean by your "something will probably change soon" comment in this thread?:
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=44237.msg900745#msg900745

So far the only "change" I've seen is this websites administrator make a concerted effort to join the ranks of Jim 'Beaver' Bob, Mad-at-Nascar and NicoRourke in a rather paltry and transparent effort to knock VR down a peg or two.

If Velvet Revolver's imminent release of their second album stirs up this much bitterness and frustration, maybe it'd be better if you just shut this section down all together?

 :beer:

The only bitterness around here comes from the ones who cannot accept the new band.
The rest of us are looking to the future. Being stuck in the past must feel bitter, yeah. :no:

Jarmo, many of us have been her for a long ass time and appreciate your forum.?
But lately you seem so pissed off lately.? Why the fuck do you care soo freaking much to get in petty ass arguments over stupid shit.? You never used to.? Falcon does a great job of keeping things under control over here on this portion of the board.? For a long time, the only news that came out was in this section.? Its great that you have a VR thread because so many of us are fans of members of GNR that are no longer in GNR. So we like to keep tabs of what they are doing.? You are the founder and moderator, but lately, you have become more of the type that needs moderated.? I agree, comparing an album to Exile on Main St. is pretty ballsy, but, no much worse to comparing Chinese Democracy to Physical Graffeti and The Wall.? This is the most dysfunctional board for the most dysfunctional band in the world.?

Good luck.?


Also Jarmo, why the hell do you care about what people say about you on other boards?  No need to be so insecure.  You have a great site!  Don't worry about what others say.

Axl never compared CD to those (even though I'm sure it will surpass them both), whereas Scott ran his big, talentless mouth again and did.
If you don't like it here, leave.

Mad at Nascar, he may not have, but every motherfucker that listened to it did.   All Axl said was "Round 1".  That sounded pretty stupid.  When is "Round 2"?

Him and Weiland both say stupid shit all the time. 

Look at Rose's sudden image change, probably caused from this board bitching about that gay ass hip hop shit he wore.  So he changed it.  So he changes his look, cause some fans don't like it.  Every singer says and does stupid things.  So what the fuck is your point?

I love it here.  I have been here a long time.  How long you been here?  1 month? 

Or possibly from the religously devout 'new gnr' fans who come to the vr section for the sole intention to bash vr and bring them down as much as they can since they seem to be resentfull of the fact that they can actually release music and provide their fans with as many updates and respect as possible.


Looking to the future? like living off of lack luster demos and bootleg live performances form 6 years ago? And the people who continually support a ?band that formed only 4 years ago and are about to release their second album are living off of the past? uhhmmm ok....

great post man!  : ok:

No, since '99, the new board since 2002.
What the hell do you know about Axl's change in style?
Why did you cut your hair? Insecure about net people not liking it long? Makes sense... :nervous:

Ok, first of all, why would I give a shit about VR releasing music or not? Most artists release  rushed shit albums all the time, I couldn't be more happy Axl is taking his time with his.
Second, what makes you think you VR fans are the only ones entitled to opinions on the band? Stop getting your feelings hurt online and stop making assumptions about people you know fuck all about.

PM's kids, use 'em.

Do you honestly think I give a flying fuck if you find my posts pathetic or not?

For the record: It was your pals who weren't interested in discussing the things said in the Q article, not me.



Less PR for VR on this board.




Pissed off?

Wrong......


Am I being less of a nice guy to certain kinds of posters? Sure.

Being nice to jerks didn't work out..... I learned that.


Once again, I'll tell you what happened.

In 2004 VR was fun, the album was ok, the live shows were fun.

In 2006, GN'R was back. I realized, VR was just a substitute.

I tried to listen to Contraband again recently, and I just found out boring and not that great.....



When I see people coming to a Guns N' Roses message board to talk shit about Guns N' Roses, I might have problems with that because I can't relate to what the fuck they're doing.

Now, you might say I'm doing the same thing.

But you're wrong, I didn't go to a VR forum, I'm still posting on a GN'R forum. Everything here is supposed to be from the perspective of a GN'R fan.

I don't mean a GN'R fan who thinks the band died and loves VR because it's got "the real Gunners" in it.

If you have a problem with the fact that some people here might not enjoy Scott Weiland's solo album or think Gilby's solo albums are classics, then you might need to look for a Weiland forum and a Gilby forum.....


We're here for GN'R. This section was created for those who are curious of what the former members are doing. That doesn't mean this is supposed to be a place of Weiland worship.

He wasn't even in GN'R!

By that logic, everybody should worship people who played in Adler's Appetite too.





Is that sarcasm? I hope so, because I haven't paid attention to what other sites do or say about me for the past 10.5 years.

I find most of the comments made about me amusing since they're so fucking wrong and lame. Says a lot about the person posting in my opinion.


/jarmo

Jarmo, you commented on the other thead that you were aware of the people talking shit about you on other boards.

Jarmo, two wrongs don't make a right.? Lets talk bad about someone (VR) cause I can, cause its a "GNR" board, but don't talk bad about GNR... Hmmmm.....?

I mean, you don't come after me at all.? So I don't have a beef, but, I just am not used to seeing you post with such little substance or class.? You are the fucking founder and Moderator.? NO NEED TO GO TO THE LEVEL OF PEOPLE YOU DON'T LIKE.? Do you get my fucking point??

If you want everyone to hate you, which seems to be what is happening, than don't be a fucking asshole.? Or, you will see a lot of old posters leaving from this lame ass shit.? Now, I am not one of those people, but where have Dave, James, Mike, Younggunner, and everyone else gone too?? Your forum is only as good as your posters.? Like a talk radio show is only as good as the callers.?

You have now become the topic, not VR, or GNR, but now Jarmo is the topic of discussion on a GNR board.? Interesting.? I thought we were here to talk about GNR and more specifically, VR in this part of the board.?

Am I the only objective fucker here that sees this??

Again Jarmo, "I LOVE YOUR SITE", but sometimes you can be wrong and out of line.

Falcon, sorry, I forgot about the pm.

i wish jarmo would just close this section down and the few trouble makers who only care about VR can go to

http://www.velvetrevolverforum.com


since then ther would be nothing here for them.

Agreed.
This board is for GN'R. Leave.

Great Idea!  The convienence of this site is hard to beat cause you can get updated on your two favorite bands at one time!

But it doesn't have anything to do with GN'R so why keep it here?
If you want to stay updated on VR, go find a fucking VR site already.

ditto..
VR talk will be better in a place totally focused to VR..

why we should have a section focused in band where most of his bandmembers doesnt stop bashing GNR/Axl, the REAL reason why this forum exists and most of us are here...

Ha ! you see Jarmo?  Im not the only one who thinks like this.

I was going to add to this comment but I realize it has everything I wanted to say.
Good post. : ok:

What's that old saying about measuring a man by the company he keeps?

Jim 'Beaver' Bob, Mad-at-Nascar, NicoRourke, Warchild ... hmmmm ...  :-\

Still, I guess they tow the company line when it comes to NuGnR.

AGAIN...That would be useless because you would also have to shutdown the ex-gunner section since talk about VR would simply move from one section to another...


Some people are just making a problem out of something that wasn't even a problem to begin with...


*Edit: why was this thread posted in the VR section in the first place?

there is no such thing as "NuGnR".  Get the fuck over it already.   Why don't you take your NuGnR back to MyGnR where that shit is condoned.    We actually support the band here.   People like you are nothing but pests, a fucking annoyance.    You clearly have no interest here other than to criticize the way the board is run, so go!  its very simple.

 :hihi: you don't make things easyer

exactly, he's a fucking troll.  he is the root of the problem at hand.   not just him, BUT since he singled me out I'll go ahead and make him the posterboy    he's nothing but a Slash loving troll who is bitter than he left GNR and that Axl kept it going and 10 years later still trolls Guns N' Roses sites with his lame one line cracks and his "NuGnR" bullshit.    I've seen plenty of his stuff to know this, he doesn't post here much because he knows he wouldn't last because he doesn't belong.

Hehehehe...

I got into a pretty decent discussion with Jarmo about this, not so long ago. I think some of you might remember.
During my posts and rebuttals, I mainly used quotes and analogies to try and convince our good founder that he was basically using double standards and being the pot who calls the kettle black. I used the usual arsenal of standard Jarmo quotes (like the "what's with the piano" thing he keeps on bringing up), along with some things specific to the thread he was posting in at the time. I mentioned the Merk letter being censored for no reason whatsoever, I mentioned that in censoring that kind of shit he accomplishes nothing but breeding a crop of "yes-men", who aren't allowed to think for themselves. I mentioned that removing public information just because it's someone else's point of view deprives people the ability to read both sides of the story and make their minds up for themselves.

I posted all that and more, in a polite, understanding and respecting manner.

My post was removed.

Just like that...

Not even a private message explaining why...

I call that bullshit, to be honest. And I don't care about being banned anymore. I come here for all the sections, not just the nuGNR section. I mainly love the VR, Ex-Gunners, Nice Boys Don't Play Rock And Roll, Appetite For Collection and Guns N' Roses sections, but I appreciate all of them. If the focus shifts even more toward nuGNR news only ('cause you can't call a thread of people posting how great something is a discussion, can you?), this site will become next to worthless. Not a threat, more like a prediction.

So in the end, I gather Jarmo is that guy in high school that changed the rules in every game he played when he wasn't winning. He is that guy who threw a fit when things didn't go his way; and now that he runs a pretty successful site, he enjoys his moment of glory an wallows in his own self indulgence, abusing what little power he has over his community. I used to respect him, but since Guns' resurrection he started losing it, little by little... and now I can finally say there is none left.

So, my question to you guys is: what is the best alternative for this forum? A place where Guns and VR are treated with equal respect, everyones point of view is appreciated, nothing is censored (except copyrighted material, of course), where guys like tomass74, Grouse, Wooody, FunkyMonkey, estebanf, RichardNixon, mikegiuliana, and the many others I like to read on this forum are left free to comment and speak their mind? Is Roses of Velvet a reasonable place? What about gnrsource, I recently got a pm invite to join them, based on my posts here, that's a good sign, isn't it?

See y'all, and keep respecting all GNR members, previous or current.

I believe the "based on your posts" thing was just a standard message that was sent to everyone. I'm thinking that because I got one too :hihi:

And me too :hihi:

Did it say "I've noticed you've made alot of good posts here, I want to invite you to a board called gnrsource.com"? God, you are so special :rofl:

Go join either of those tiny communities, if you want activity and solid news and facts then HTGTH is the place, but I guess since you signed up for a site where you obviously have a big problem with the rules, so long sucker! :beer:

Great post! People who refer to Guns N' Roses as "nuGNR" aren't even worth spending time on.


Don't let the door hit ya on your way out! :peace:

Being aware and letting it affect me is two different things.



Well, get used to it.

If their lead singer wants to talk shit about GN'R, he and his fans shouldn't expect GN'R to treat him as a Golden God.




Dave wanted to be a martyr.

He was posting about being banned here and not visiting months ago. What happene? He came back to post something he shouldn't have and I banned him. Just like he claimed had happened months ago.

His dream came true. Now he can keep posting his "GN'R could make a video for Better using live footage from 2006 because I told them so" posts elsewhere.


Some of the other posters aren't even interested in GN'R anymore, so why would they come to a GN'R board?

I don't feel like I wanna read "I'm not gonna support this band until the album is out" over and over again. Or reading posts by these people whining about things because they so fucking "objective". Objective? More like frustrated and not being honest to admit it.

So you start blaming the band you're supposed to support.




/jarmo

this should be in the section down the bottom really....

any mods gonna move it, its just another silly "im gonna start a revolution against the mods" thread.

Whatever.. Jarmo clearly instigated the demise of that last thread whether he brought up Gn'R or not.. And to reply to one of your posts on the last thread that was locked..

Yes the official VR forum does have a Gn'R section....

Where everyone bashes Axl, who would have guessed.  :o

That's fucking unbelievable. Being singled out for being a GN'R fan on a GN'R board.

It's just fucking unbelievable.

What's even funnier is the fact that I never insulted VR or wrote shit about them. What is true is that I don't like Weiland's music, I don't like the band's music, IMO there's nothing creative. They are sucking what they've done in previous bands.

And It's true, I have a problem with the acts & talks of Sorum and Weiland. But hey, It's my fucking right !

Like what happens here with Slash in the VR section, big surprise.

I was talking about Scott Weiland and apparently I'm not allowed to have an opinion on the guy because I happen to be an administrator.

I asked a very simple question, and some of the VR fans brought GN'R into the thread, only Grouse answered the question I asked. Go and read it before you keep whining.

 ::)


/jarmo

What the fuck are you talking about? I was referring to chineseblues post that Axl gets slagged on the VR board. Pardon me, for quoting the whole thing. I've edited the post happy?  ::)

This thread is talking in general about the VR section, and you mentioned Slash.

I mentioned that even questioning Scott Weiland will get the VR fans to start talking about GN'R/Axl....




/jarmo

Slash / Duff whatever. The point I was trying to make was that it shouldn't be surprising that Axl / GN'R would get bashed in the GN'R section of a VR board in the same way that there are similar posts about Slash / Duff in the VR section of this board.


Well that's their problem then. Did I reply to your post? I understood perfectly what you were trying to say. I indulge in such conversations only when a certain set of people
make a habit out of posting crap in every VR related thread. After a while it's annoying to read, whatever the fuck their opinion of VR might be.

'I was talking about Scott Weiland' ?:hihi: you put it very innocently, c'mon , one thing is to say once that you don't like him, another is to become a hater, so you don't like Weiland, we get it, but there's no need to be picking every little detail about what you don't like about him or VR, and yes that is what you have been doing lately- as mentioned with the 'what's with the piano' comments and you posting Duff's video.. why even waste your time on VR at all if you don't like them?

I bought contraband and was let down; the only reason I come to the VR section ?is to see if they come up with a way to surprise me, but to see you (as someone else said) lower yourself to the level of gnr haters is just as annoying as they are. And don't limit yourself to this ONE thread, view everything as a whole, posters remember what you said in other threads last week; last month or whatever; and it comes a time when it all builds up and bites you in the ass; and ?it doesnt matter if you said it in one thread or the other cause it's the same VR section and its basically the same subjects all the time, so dont expect people to forget what you said and don't pretend to be all that innocent.

 and Im not whinning, if anything Im the only one who doesnt have a personal vendetta against you just because you said VR was tha sucky :P (cause Im an axlite and I don't like VR) :P

I saw something funny, and commented on it.

I think their image is funny.

It reminds me of GN'R back in the day, but then it was easy to believe it because it was 20 years ago.



Hater? WTF? I never called Scott a skinny junkie or anything like that.

Unlike all the "GN'R fans" who make personal attacks on Axl and the band.





You still don't understand, I'm commenting on a guy who I think is overrated. He's never been involved in creating the music that made us GN'R fans.

I have no respect for him the way I respect the former GN'R members.

You need to understand that the VR section is for opinions on the band from the GN'R fan point of view.

I'm a GN'R fan..... Are you?  :P




/jarmo

hmmm I think you can be a hater without making personal attacks; the haters making personal attacks are only the cream of the cream? :hihi:
For example; lets take Madagascar; if you have a poster saying how musically the structure of madagascar is weak ; the arrangements are this and that; Axl's voice sounds bad ;? fortus guitar work is laughable.. etc etc..... well if I see a post like that I can see where he is coming from, it is not an opinion that I share but he has a right to mention such things so I let it go.... however ...if I see such poster invading all threads with the same remarks over and over and over again... something else comes to light besides his criticism.....HIS HATE !

which leads me to the way you feel about weiland...yet again on your post you talk about how he sucks......ok.... fine.... but why insist on it all the time? doesnt it strike you as weird to waste your time talking about something you don't like... I don't go around all the time talking about tofu..... :hihi: because if you insist on it..... chances are you are going to bump into someone who loves tofu to death, who eats tofu with eggs morning day and night? all the fuckin time and it's going to take offense in you telling everybody how tofu tastes like your grandma's undies... ;D and even if you don't understand and don't agree with the tofu eating freak you have to realize that that is what he likes..and you have to let it be :P and let him wallow in tofu along with his tofu loving friends.



as for this: "You need to understand that the VR section is for opinions on the band from the GN'R fan point of view."

you may wanna put that in writting next to the title of the section.

Exactly. As long as everyone was clear on that, there were no problems were there? Then came the trolls.

Ha!  This is nuts!  From a GNR fan's view, that may be a fan of VR as well.  90% of GNR fans like VR on some level.  This is nuts. 

Jarmo, so you feel it necessary to kill Weiland because he may have said something about your God Axl?  Let Axl fight his own fights.  Guess what, Kurt Cobain didn't like Axl either.  What else is new.  "Get used to it", are we in 5th grade again?  Like we should feel threatened by your opinion on VR?  Like anyone gives a fuck now that your credibility is thrown out of the window? 

Some people are jealous that VR has a fanbase and is putting out albums.  Why be jealous when you already know the new lineup of GNR is the greatest band to never release an album?

I think having an opinion is fine. I myself think that Scott doesn't come close to Axl in talent. But to bash someone for no reason saying that he's so mediocre that he mustn't be confident about his record... Well, that's called hatred.

That should about sum it up for everyone.  I'll be the first one to admit that shit has been crazy on here the past few days.  Hell I was PISSED at Jarmo for the whole madagascar fiasco.  But then I really thought about it and I realized that he was between a rock and a hard place, he had to choose between two extremes.  1.  Let a totally open discussion ensue with everyone and their brother asking about getting a link to the leak ect or 2.  Just nipping it in the bud before all the bullshit could even start.  I'm still not sure what he should have done, and I am totally glad that I wasnt the one that had to make that decision.  Jarmo is doing the best that he can given the circumstances.  Everyone that is giving Jarmo a hard time needs to just relax, I mean jesus if he wanted to be a total prick he could just pull the plug on the board.  I may not agree with everything he does, but I respect the decisions he makes. : ok:

This is ridiculous. Please, point out where I said it's not ok for him to be confident.

Pleeeeeeease!


You seem to read what you want to read.

I clearly stated I found his whole "this  is gonna be as great as Exile On Main Street" comment ridiculous.


Maybe you need to be careful about what kind of accusations you throw around, especially since you were the one who brought GN'R into the thread in the first place.







I like them on one level too. They're amusing.





For fuck's sake.

I'm saying Weiland isn't the most popular singer besides Axl among GN'R fans. Live with it.

Especially after everything he says about Axl/GN'R.

We don't need to be the biggest Weiland fans, we're GN'R fans.




That can't be aimed at me so I can't answer your question.





/jarmo

Since I wrote it down in the thread I don't feel the need to repeat it again and again just because you don't wanna (or can't) understand it. And don't act like I would have been made that thread into a VR vs. GN'R fight. I only pointed out that you are biased and you didn't find the other band's comments about their forthcoming album this 'ridiculous'.  BTW Exile is not among the best Stones album IMO.  :P

No, seriously, please point out where I said it's not ok for Scott to be confident about his new material.

I only pointed out the part where he basically said this new album will be a classic rock album (like Exile...).

I also pointed out differences between what Brain said and what Scott said.

You chose to ignore all that and instead repeat your lies. So, please, go find the quote where I claimed it's not ok for artists to be happy about their new songs.

I will apologize for you if you can find the quote.  : ok:




/jarmo

My lies?  :o  Hilarious!  :rofl:  Is it allowed to insult others on this board?  :-*

I still can't find how you pointed out the difference between the comments (Led Zeppelin II vs. Exile). I only see a sad attempt as your trying to denial your double standards.

Saying that it will be a classic means that Scott's confident about the record. You know, like he'd have said it will be 'Earth-shattering' and 'groundbreaking' etc.  ;)  I don't know if he's right or not. I will have an opinion after I listened the album a few times. Like I do it with every other band's record.

You can think that VR sucks. You can think that Contraband sucked. But judging an album before it got released... well, I'm not smart enough to do that. After it comes out you can criticize the shit out of it. For valid or invalid reasons. Your choose. 'From a GN'R fans point of view', like it'd mean anything. We are all GN'R fans here and like different kinds of music and different band. You use this as it'd be an objective position.

Critizing his comment before the album's out... you haven't heard a song off the album. Not even a demo or a live version. But Mr. Objective comes and says that Scott is mediocre so he can't write good music and shouldn't be talking shit like it'll be a classic. Guess you already know that Libertad will suck or will be mediocre at best. There is no chance that it will be a classic.  ::)  I don't say it will be... we will hear it and then judge it. To each its on.

That's your lie right there. I never said that he can't be confident.


I pointed out how saying "this will be a classic album like Exile On Main Street" is different from "this will be GN'R's Led Zeppelin II".

So, instead of repeating how I "hate" VR or how I judged the album before hearing it (which I never did because I never commented on the music), please find the quote where I said it's not ok for Scotty boy to be confident or happy about his new songs.

I said I wasn't expecting him to write anything as good as Jagger/Richards. Only because I don't think he's got the talent.


Maybe you expect a guy working at McDonald's to be able to cook you a nice three course meal.... I mean, he's in the restaurant business so he must be a master chef.....


But, as I've said, please point out where I said it's not ok for him to be happy about the material.  : ok:




/jarmo

It's my last try to make you understand that saying it will be a classic means that you are confident about your record. Every musician say that their next album 'will be good', so it's like saying 'it'll come out and it's our next album'. Doesn't mean anything. But when you're saying it will be a classic record like Exile or you say it will be 'Earth-shattering' the it means you a re confident.
When you question what he's saying without hearing the album is denying he has the right to be confident.


Yeah, you said:


Maybe you haven't heard those albums but the first 4 Led Zep albums went to about the same direction. BTW LZ I and LZII came out in the same year. So I don't see any paralel here, but I'm glad you do.



Maybe you should take some time to read your own posts. You repeated again that he has no talent to write quality music. It's judging the album before it got released since you 'stated' that it cannot be that good.



Alright? ::)

Keep trying. You put words in my mouth.

You clearly fucking stated that I said he shouldn't be confident.

Confident: This is the best music I've ever created, I think this album is way better than the previous one, I think my band mates have created some amazing songs

Ridiculous: We've written this is the best album of all times (said by somebody who's never been close to even writing the best album of the decade),   ;)




Read his quote. He didn't just seem confident, he seemed certain he has created a classic rock album that people will talk about in 30-40 years.

I thought that was ridiculous.





No, you really need to stop taking my posts out of context.

I said I don't think he can write music that'll be remembered years from now like the stuff Jagger/Richards write years and years ago.


Quality is something that's hard to measure. You love Snakepit, most of us think it's crap.

But we can pretty much say that "It's Five O'Clock Somewhere" hardly falls under the "classic rock albums" category. It's not "Led Zeppelin's "IV" or even Appetite For Destruction.


You might think it's A+ quality, and nobody can say you're wrong, but if you say it's a classic rock album, we can say you're wrong.


Since you failed to show me the quote where I stated Scott can't be confident, you're talking out of your ass. You keep twisting my words, but your quote says it all.




/jarmo

Sorry to bring GnR into this again, but will all due respect, Scott Weiland has had more success in his career than each of the 6 guys who joined GnR in the last ten years combined. Yet, I think everyone on this site believes they have the talent to pull of something big, so why not Scott. Ok, in your subjective opinion, Scott sucks and is untalented, but many other people love his music. Contraband wasn't the most consistent album, but Slither, You Got No Right and Loving The Alien are great songs. Even Axl said he would love to have made Contraband, or so Slash said and we have no reason not to believe him. Personally, I prefer the stuff Slash Duff and Matt have done in their career to anything the Stones have done, and I definately think that they and Weiland and Kushner have the potential to make an album as good as Exile On Main St. You don't agree, obviously, but lots of people do, so insulting Weiland for holding an opinion that a lot of people agree with is kinda crazy.

As for modesty, loadsa artists say stuff like "Our music will blow people away", etc. It's not their job to be modest.

Do I need to answer that?

The answer is: The guy who's the singer in the band this site is dedicated to.

You can have a bunch of talented people, but if you don't have somebody to street the ship, you won't use the group's full potential.




Slither is the best track on that album, then most the rest is filler.



We don't?




Good for you, I disagree.




Right, but I have pointed out why I think this comment was ridiculous.

This guy said Fall To Pieces was some kind of classic rock track that everybody would love too.....




/jarmo

i actually though fall to peices did have that classic rock vibe. :peace:

the difference is that not everybody loves it...

I do hope however that with all I and other posters have said that jarmo will gain some perspective and finally let it go a few days or weeks from now :P

nothing is loved by everyone.

I think that Contraband is a solid record, but far away from being a classic rock album. It's not bad at all. Some songs have some sort of identical tune in it; and some people have to get used to it, just like I did.
"Spectacle" is the best song in my opinion, but everybody prefers something different. And it is cool that way.

But the major point is, this is a "Guns N' Roses" board. 99% of the visitors come here to read news about GN'R in the first place. The other sections have been created by GN'R fans who share the love for other things too. So it will always have a different point of view on VR for example than on a "normal" VR board. A lot of people I have talked to on the net or personally are disappointed by Contraband, they expected something better. Especially when you look at the members of the band. The potential is bigger than the stuff they have done so far.
I dislike Scott for several reasons. I don't like his voice on some songs, I don't like his stage presence and other stuff, but that didn't stop me from buying Contraband the day it was released. I wanted to hear their music so that I could be able to either change my mind or to get my thoughts and fears confirmed. It was a little mix of both things, but the disappointment was slightly bigger.
Judging from this first album (I have nothing else to judge from) and judging from his and the other members other works I really doubt that there will be some "ground-breaking" songs on Libertad. I hope I am wrong, but I will know when I have the album here. At THIS time I can only assume things by looking on the past stuff.

As far as song writing skills are concerned only some of Izzy's solo work had some major rock riffs that "touched" me, but that's again only from a personal point of view.

Everything on this board is in fact from a "GN'R fan's point of view", so people should get used to it.
People who started with Contraband may think of it being a great album, but I don't, because I know what great stuff Slash kicked out of his amps in the past.
And on their debut album Contraband there was nothing great in my opinion. But to make it clear again, I enjoy listening to Contraband, it's a solid rock album, but it brings tears in my eyes to hear that there is so much "quality" left that has not been used on it.

Hey Jarmo

Can you please find out why I got my 2nd demerit? Noone is telling me.


 :peace:

Like someone else stated, maybe just because of this.
 :peace:
 :peace:
 :peace:
 :peace:


???

I've been doing it for like 3 years or something. Why would it be a problem now?


 :peace:

I don't know. But that's all I could see. ???

So true, but lyrically it just repeats itself, with the exception of You Got No Right the rest is filler or horse shit as i like to call it.

Than that's some damn fine horse shit!? :hihi:

I hate to see some shitty horse shit then  :hihi: