Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Administrative => Administrative, Feedback & Help => Topic started by: Donington2007 on February 15, 2007, 01:02:54 PM



Title: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Donington2007 on February 15, 2007, 01:02:54 PM
hey Jarmo is it possible to tell us what percentage of the members are 36 or older? at least for the members who put their date of birth in their info? thanx


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Skeba on February 15, 2007, 01:06:30 PM
I'd say about 7,6%. Or a bit more or less... There are error limits to these kinds of things you know (in this case about 1,19%).

This is based on: http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=14131.0


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Neemo on February 15, 2007, 01:11:49 PM
a poll from march 2005 :peace:

Quote
What's your age?
 
0-14  228 votes 6.1%     
15-19  1120 votes 29.8%     
20-24  1037 votes 27.6%     
25-29  824 votes 21.9%     
30-34  363 votes 9.7%     
35-39  104 votes 2.8%     
40-44  36 votes 1%     
45-  43 votes 1.1%     
 
 
Total votes: 3755
The poll started on March 14th, 2005 and ended on March 20th, 2005 


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Donington2007 on February 15, 2007, 01:17:01 PM
a poll from march 2005 :peace:

Quote
What's your age?
 
0-14  228 votes 6.1%     
15-19  1120 votes 29.8%     
20-24  1037 votes 27.6%     
25-29  824 votes 21.9%     
30-34  363 votes 9.7%     
35-39  104 votes 2.8%     
40-44  36 votes 1%     
45-  43 votes 1.1%     
 
 
Total votes: 3755
The poll started on March 14th, 2005 and ended on March 20th, 2005 

thanks. this will do unless Jarmo can find that its different.


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: polluxlm on February 15, 2007, 02:43:09 PM
So about 50% of the people here probably became fans after the heydays.

Axl still got some pull it seems.


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Jim on February 15, 2007, 02:54:34 PM
... No. Wait, I mean, yeah. But that's not the reason, really. Good music, as in real good music, is always gonna be good music. Innit?


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Robman? on February 15, 2007, 10:21:34 PM
... No. Wait, I mean, yeah. But that's not the reason, really. Good music, as in real good music, is always gonna be good music. Innit?

fo sho - if its good, anyone can like it.



Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Krispy Kreme on February 16, 2007, 01:50:52 AM
The correct question to ask is not the average age, but the median age (one-half above,  one-half below, the cut off point). Average age in this context makes no sense. If you have a significant percentage who are 45, let's say, and another significant percentage  who are 15, the "average" may be 30, but that really tells you nothing. So you really want to know the median age. If more statistics are forthcoming we  can do some really interesting statistical  analyses! ;D


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: wadey on February 17, 2007, 08:35:07 AM
So about 50% of the people here probably became fans after the heydays.

Axl still got some pull it seems.

and about 50% before  :rofl:


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: WARose on February 19, 2007, 11:01:08 AM
The correct question to ask is not the average age, but the median age (one-half above,  one-half below, the cut off point). Average age in this context makes no sense. If you have a significant percentage who are 45, let's say, and another significant percentage  who are 15, the "average" may be 30, but that really tells you nothing. So you really want to know the median age. If more statistics are forthcoming we  can do some really interesting statistical  analyses! ;D

if you look at the statistics it?s pretty easy to find that out...


should be 20-24....


Title: Re: Average age of htgth members (Jarmo)
Post by: Krispy Kreme on February 22, 2007, 11:13:52 PM
The correct question to ask is not the average age, but the median age (one-half above,? one-half below, the cut off point). Average age in this context makes no sense. If you have a significant percentage who are 45, let's say, and another significant percentage? who are 15, the "average" may be 30, but that really tells you nothing. So you really want to know the median age. If more statistics are forthcoming we? can do some really interesting statistical? analyses! ;D

if you look at the statistics it?s pretty easy to find that out...


should be 20-24....



No that is not correct. Median is one-half? above, one? half? below.

If? you used the 20-24 category, that would include all categories? below? it, which comes to 64 percent of the sample, so that is overweighted. Thus, that cannot be the median. To get the median, you need? to have the number? of people in each age, not each age category. Then you can calculate the median.

Trust me, I use? statistics a lot in my work, so I know what? I am talking about.? ?