Here Today... Gone To Hell!

I got my copy today its done by Masterplan and Licensed by Plata Music

The quality is not that great in my opinion and it also has a big MP in a circle in the Left hand corner here are some pics of the DVD casing Click for bigger pictures

(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/7395/image731vi8.th.jpg) (http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image731vi8.jpg)

(http://img107.imageshack.us/img107/7619/image729kb1.th.jpg) (http://img107.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image729kb1.jpg)

(http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/5735/image730bo1.th.jpg) (http://img507.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image730bo1.jpg)


Tracklist

Nightrain
Mr Brownstone
Live and let Die
Attitude
Its So Easy
Wild Horses
Patience
Double Talking Jive
Civil War
Welcome To The Jungle
November Rain
You Could Be Mine
Band Intros
Godfather theme
Coma


Edit by Will: I modified the title because it was misleading for people for whom English is not their native language.

I have to add the only guy that was confused was a native speaker of English  :rofl:

That's official? You sure? ???

Shit man, I thought you meant the 2006 show.? ?:crying:

No its not official but everyone was saying it was this is the one HMV has had listed for sale for ever and a day

I pretty sure its not official.

I've heard lots of things about this. Odd copies floating around hmv stores etc.

According to other people, the quality is no better than the boots that we've already got.

ha ha thanks man

Anyway...  Wear do I buy it?

Totally not official, they are using a photo from 1987 on the cover that should be the 1st clue.

How does the quality measure against the boot though?

Well im no expert but to me its the same quality as the boot but with a MP in a circle in the corner

Sorry, I meant the sound.  The sound is really bad on my boot and switches back and forth from hifi to mono or something like that.  I assume they cleaned that up for this release?

Is there a specific song it does it on

Actually scrub that on nightrain it does it you get the little white Hi Fi sign come up from the original VHS recording so no they have not cleaned it up either

Edit Fuck it does it a lot what a pissing rip off. I wonder where this stands with HMV could i report it

as far as i know, this ISNT an official release.....

Dude, that's not an official release. Just because it's in stores, doesn't mean it's officially licensed by Guns N' Roses.

Several have stated that the DVD is sourced from the bootleg, and plus that's not even the full show. The bootleg has the full show (Paradise City is cut), and is also pro-shot.

Get the bootleg...

For fucks sake dude do you think im stupid or something i know the Dvd is not official i never mentioned anywhere that is was official ,the idea of the topic was to inform people of the quality of the dvd which i have. I always knew is was unofficial even when i placed the order 3 months or so ago with hmv.com my hope was that a better source had been found not them using the stuff we had already downloaded.   

It's not offical. Why would Axl release a DVD of the old band it's horrible business if they release a DVD it should be Norway 06 or Rock AM Ring.

i think they should release a dvd of 91 inglewood forum proshot official  ;)

Title of thread:

The Chicago 9th April 1992 Rosemont Horizon DVD is now Officially released

Yes "Officialally released" is different to "The Official Chicago DVD is Released" if like me you had been following this DVD you will know that it has been stalled and put off for many months so no i was not calling this DVD official   

How stupid are these people? Look at the pic then watch the DVD. See how many of the dudes from that photo are in the DVD.


 :peace:

Yes I do think you're stupid. At least with this statement, I do.

The title of your thread was Chicago 1992 Officially released. Officially released & officially licensed means the same thing. The band is backing the 'official' release of this product.

Either you can't accept you were misled, or screwed up the title, either way, it's on you.

Fuck you dont hide behind your computer calling me stupid, i was in no way way mislead by this Dvd and no i never screwed up the title, like i said i have had this dvd on order for 3-4 months it has had numerous release dates that were cancelled and now its released, the thread was to tell people about the quality of this product. If you or anyone misread the title or the thread thats your problem thats how half the bullshit rumours start round here people not reading things properly jumping to conclusions etc 

No, it is not the same thing. By saying something has been officially released you are just saying that it has definately been released. It's like me saying something like, "tomorrow I will officially release my pictures". That's saying that the date and actual time of the release is definate (hence official). Now, if he had said that "The Official Chicago 9th April 1992 Rosemont Horizon DVD...." has been released, then it would've been a different story.? In this case, semantics makes a difference.

When I read the title of the thread, I knew instantly what he meant. You just misunderstood it (as shown by your 1st post). The dude obviously posted the thread to compare the DVD with the bootleg and show it to people who might've bought it if the video and sound quality had been better (sadly, it's the same). That was the purpose. So, don't point fingers at him.

so im guessing the dvd is an unnoficial dvd?

Dude...

Yes.

The thread title is misleading. The Rosemont DVD will be OFFICIALLY released in February. The one in this thread was UNOFFICIALLY released.

The one in February won't be an official release. Trust me :)

No, that will be the same as this, same cut tracklisting.

Get off anythinggoes back, he is just trying to show you all something he got, not trying to mislead anyone. ?Sheesh!

Huh?

Dude, give it up. He fucked up the title of the thread.

It's no big deal. He's the one that lost his mind over someone even saying it. Jeezus...

Official doesn't mean officially, and... WTF?

I suggest you go back to school and learn YOUR English again. (http://www.fuckyou.com/images/smilies/fuck-you.gif)

Sorry if this has already been posted but...

http://www.play.com/Music/MusicDVD/4-/3256082/Guns_N_Roses_Live_In_Chicago/Product.html

I think this is such a sh*t choice of concert to release, and I also think that Axl will probably stop it from being released anyway...

Why do they have to release a concert that has been floating around the GN'R network for such a long time in pro-shot, and the verison we all have is almost the full setlist, official is not...

I would love to see somethin from the 'Skin N' Bones' era... anyone got any ideas why they choose this to release?

http://inthejungle.9.forumer.com/index.php?showtopic=12316

In my forum i post the notice yet, the question is: This is the official?

cuz its unofficial and they probably didn't even know "tokyo" was released.. in my eyes i think all the 92 concerts were the same


what rosemont dvd? what is rosemont?

Hi guys,

Apologies if I'm blind, but I couldn't find reference to this.

I've seen a DVD on play.com due for release on 5th Feb - I take it this is the old line up?

Anyone shed some light or point me in the right direction?

Reply or pm me,

Bob

yeah its the old line up from the '91 show i think

Old Lineup, from 1992, inofficial DVD pro shot.

yeah '82 my mistake

no.... 92'  ;)