|
Title: The "other" banned article Post by: pasnow on November 30, 2006, 03:32:15 PM OK, so MTV posts an article about GnR & how, it seems CD may not come out this year. Now that's banned too? How is that "bad" towards Axl?
Geeez this place is really getting on my nerves. I think I'm out. Quit babying this 44 year old man & start being real. We got 4 Tuesdays left, Dec 4th IS NOT HAPPENING. Dec 26th is highly doubtful as well. So we are left with 2 Tuesdays. Jarmo, I know you're thinking is "They told us 2006 so 2006 it is until we hear otherwise", but that is a bit absurd way to believe. That's like rooting for the worst team in Baseball team to make the World Series up until the World Series is over.? Face reality, and let's start allowing things that question the reality of a 2006 release. Honestly, I don't think it's happening. My biggest beef is that the article was supportive of Axl & even had a few positive quote's from people (Tom Morello of Audioslave). Everyone of them was looking forward to it & hearing it. Yet because it states it's 'doubtful' (but not impossible) to be released in 2006 it's banned. This is ridiculous, Axl's baby ass can take that CD & Tommy's bass guitar & stick it where the sun don't shine.? :rant: Oh, and uhh BTW, Sebastian Bach sucks too!! ;) For those of you who don't seem to know that. I'm out. Late Title: Re: The "other" banned article Post by: Hysteron on November 30, 2006, 03:40:03 PM How is that "bad" towards Axl? A bunch of people from bands who have no relevance whatsoever expect (Avenged), claiming that the album isn't worth it, that the music won't be relevant and other Axl bashing. Title: Re: The "other" banned article Post by: Lucky on November 30, 2006, 03:45:19 PM its not deleted.
its been moved to the CD release date rumour thread Title: Re: The "other" banned article Post by: Eazy E on November 30, 2006, 05:34:02 PM How is that "bad" towards Axl? A bunch of people from bands who have no relevance whatsoever expect (Avenged), claiming that the album isn't worth it, that the music won't be relevant and other Axl bashing. Way to defend a thread being deleted when it really wasn't. : ok: Title: Re: The "other" banned article Post by: Hysteron on November 30, 2006, 05:37:12 PM How is that "bad" towards Axl? A bunch of people from bands who have no relevance whatsoever expect (Avenged), claiming that the album isn't worth it, that the music won't be relevant and other Axl bashing. Way to defend a thread being deleted when it really wasn't.? ?: ok: Will if it was, or will be in the future, my argument stands. Title: Re: The "other" banned article Post by: Eazy E on November 30, 2006, 05:38:47 PM Will if it was, or will be in the future, my argument stands. Until then you just look like a big cheeseball who will back anything that gets deleted! :hihi: Title: Re: The "other" banned article Post by: Hysteron on November 30, 2006, 05:40:11 PM Will if it was, or will be in the future, my argument stands. Until then you just look like a big cheeseball who will back anything that gets deleted!? :hihi: I don't recall backing the Rolling Stonne article getting deleted. |