Here Today... Gone To Hell!

I ripped the audio from the video at www.gunsnroses.com, into a high quality MP3...

Here is the direct download link. Right click, Save Target As to download it...

http://www.gnr2k.com/downloads/nightrain.mp3

Feel free to spread the link around...
 :D

The whole audio bootleg is already released so I shouldn't think there's any need for this :)

This is the soundboard. The other bootleg was Axl's monitor mix, so you can barely hear the guitars, and theres a big hiss.

Think before ya post! : ok:

no reason for mp3 it needs to be flac

The original file is wmv, so the audio is lossy. No reason for a big FLAC file when the original is lossy. And why are you such a troll in every "mp3" thread? Get a life. Or why dont u just make a new forum, called GNR FLACs. You can have only FLAC's. Then you wont have to bother with this mp3 stuff : ok: : ok:

Oh I see. I had no idea the audio source was different :P
Thanks for pointing that out :)

now it is going to be low quality no one wants to put the good quality up only compressed bad mp3. thanjs fish but put flac up as well

Axl voice is incredible in this file!

Dude shut up, your so annoying. First of all, why even bother posting in this thread, TWICE. Second, if you read my post above you would understand why it isn't in FLAC.

i do not care because i do not will not never believe that it is lossy unless the original file was mp3 if it is not mp3 to start then it is not lossy no matter what u anyone says

It is a .wmv file....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wmv

WMA is an even worser audio quality than MP3.

Now, I'm done with you...

Enjoy all :peace:

you are right on that i correct myself i was wrong i can not help the way i feel i like flac i am sorry fish

Its ok, I just wanted to explain to you that the stream was wmv, so no need for lossless. If it was in a higher quality, lossless type of video/audio.. than I would post the FLAC of it.

Enjoy

i am getting this cd set soon
it will be put here if it is lossy i can not help it

GUNS N' ROSES / INLAND INVASION = Live at Hyundai Pavilion, Devore, California, USA September 23, 2006 + Live at Wembley Arena, London, UK July 29, 2006 C060928 LOST AND FOUND 2CDR)

If they caught the Cali show from the stream, which I'm sure they did... it will be lossy...
excited to hear the wembley show! :)

no u will not be

Disc 1: 1.WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE 2.IT'S SO EASY 3.MR.BROWNSTONE 4.LIVE AND LET DIE 5.ROBIN GUITAR SOLO 6.SWEET CHILD O'MINE 7.KNOCKIN' ON HEAVEN'S DOOR 8.YOU COULD BE MINE 9.JAM 10.DIZZY PIANO SOLO 11.THE BLUES 12.BAND INTRO 13.RICHARD GUITAR SOLO (BEAUTIFUL) 14.OUT TA GET ME 15.JAM 16.NOVEMBER RAIN Disc 2: 1.BETTER 2.MY MICHELLE 3.RON GUITAR SOLO (DON'T CRY) 4.I.R.S. 5.PATIENCE 6.NIGHTRAIN 7.ROCKET QUEEN 8.MADAGASCAR 9.PARADISE CITY "Live at Hyundai Pavilion, Devore, California, USA September 23, 2006" 10.SWAY 11.SAILING 12.BACK IN THE U.S.S.R. "Live at Wembley Arena, London, UK July 29, 2006"

Whats the difference between flac n mp3? is it really that huge?


 :peace:

No its not. FLAC is usually atleast 3 to 5 times the size of an MP3 and to the human ear, it is BARELY noticable. But collecters just prefer the FLAC's, which is fine.. but timebomb here is a little over the line, and will threaten you if you are "an mp3 lover"  :rofl: :rofl:

Great job Efish. This top quality shit! Who cares if it's FLAC? It F@#king Rocks! You should do some more for us. It Kicks Ass!  :peace:

you cant hear ron at ALL. it kinda sucks

thanks for the file

but you're wrong in your statements about FLAC files. They are not ''huge files identical to mp3 but freaky collectors want them because they are complicated people''

Differences between a FLAC file, from a real lossless source, and mp3 are VERY noticeable. Maybe not in a 10 bucks PC stereo speaker set, but in a decent audio system, the differences are more than noticeable.

In my opinion, when someone records audio from a stream, its recomendable to encode it in a 320 kbps mp3 file. It would still be a small file, and the loss of quality will be reduced at the minimum. If we are talking of just one file, like in this case, I would encode it to flac ''just in case'', but I know that its completely senseless to convert a shitty 32kbps stream to FLAC if we are talking about a 2 hours set

Yeah, i was just talking about the everyday person who just wants to download a random song. Does he pick FLAC or MP3. The obvious choice should be MP3. And the way you came off as I was reffering to collectors is wrong, because I myself do collect shows in FLAC, just for the sake of.. If Im going to collect, they might as well be in the best quality. For the sake of just getting a song and downloading, and playing it on your PC, mp3 is the right way to go. BTW, I almost always have my MP3's at 320 by the way.

I thnik the quality sounds pretty damn good to me, I wish Ron's guitar could be hear. Maybe theyll fix it tomorrow, like with Paradise City. :peace:

of course dude, forgive me if I sounded a little rude, I perfectly understand what you're saying

mp3 is light, it can be played everywhere, and in the relation size/quality, they are an INCREDIBLE format

thanks a lot dude  : ok: