|
Title: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: undercovergunner on June 26, 2006, 08:28:53 PM AFD could have been called welcome to the jungle
lie's could be called patience because you need that with axl ill 1 could be november rain ill 2 could be MY WORLD (j/k) or estranged So why do we have a title track for this album? Why not just title it guns n roses since it is a new begining? This all seems very different then when axl didn't have as much pull with the band,singles got released, axl still nailed bitches in the ass, slash was the mouthpeice of the band and now we have almost no info for ten+ years. My point is that gnr is a new thing now so I think it should be self titled (opinions please) Maybe they are touring under the band name for this reason I mean it's possible and it would shock everyone Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: DunkinDave on June 26, 2006, 08:38:43 PM My head hurts from reading that.
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: ShotgunBlues1978 on June 26, 2006, 08:39:41 PM The title was inspired by the song. Axl wrote the song Chinese Democracy and thought it would be a cool name for the album, no need to overthink it
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: CheapJon on June 26, 2006, 08:43:24 PM i read somewhere that he was gonna call the album chinese theocracy.. but then he changed his mind to democracy instead of theocracy..
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: WAxlRose on June 26, 2006, 08:43:54 PM hes axl he can do what he wants, this topic is dumb and stupid
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Steel_Angel on June 26, 2006, 08:45:58 PM i heard in a radio station the new album would be called "chinese conspiracy"
??? Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: undercovergunner on June 26, 2006, 08:49:05 PM Well the topic may be stupid but I would still like opinions so I may entertain myself at the internets expense
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: axlsalinger on June 26, 2006, 08:55:51 PM I really, REALLY hate it when bands don't name their albums. It's annoying when they do it with the debut, and I especially hate it when an established band does this. If you don't even have enough creativity to come up with a name for the record, what does that say about the rest of the album? Yeah, I know, I know. New beginnings, this time we are really going to kick ass, blah blah blah. To me, it's just lame.
One exception: The White Album Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: dave-gnfnr2k on June 26, 2006, 08:56:04 PM It was going to be called 2000 intentions
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: DunkinDave on June 26, 2006, 08:57:21 PM Well the topic may be stupid but I would still like opinions so I may entertain myself at the internets expense Your run-on sentences are much more entertaining than we could possibly be. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: EFISH on June 26, 2006, 09:02:20 PM This all seems very different then when axl didn't have as much pull with the band,singles got released, axl still nailed bitches in the ass, slash was the what makes u think thats not happening? Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: axlsalinger on June 26, 2006, 09:08:51 PM Quote It was going to be called 2000 intentions That was back in 1999, when Axl appeared ready to put some music out there (Oh My God did get released on the soundtrack), and at that point the 'intention' was to release CD in 2000.Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: EccoTides on June 26, 2006, 09:10:29 PM Self-Titled records are just boring titles, and it would be really confusing just calling the album "Guns N' Roses" at this point.
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: undercovergunner on June 26, 2006, 09:34:38 PM Well the topic may be stupid but I would still like opinions so I may entertain myself at the internets expense Your run-on sentences are much more entertaining than we could possibly be. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: undercovergunner on June 26, 2006, 09:37:40 PM Self-Titled records are just boring titles, and it would be really confusing just calling the album "Guns N' Roses" at this point. But the tour is labeled as gnr and not cd so they are already confusing people.Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: tHeElEcTrIcSiNtAr on June 26, 2006, 09:39:58 PM Actually Appetite was gonna be called Welcome To The Jungle until Axl saw the painting then he wanted it to be called Appetite, and the rest of the band agreed.
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: undercovergunner on June 26, 2006, 09:41:33 PM This all seems very different then when axl didn't have as much pull with the band,singles got released, axl still nailed bitches in the ass, slash was the what makes u think thats not happening? Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: nycangel on June 26, 2006, 09:44:30 PM reading this topic exhausted me lol
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Dragoon77 on June 26, 2006, 11:12:57 PM Some things are different in the NewGNR world... in the past the only song in which the title wasnt on the lyrics was Estranged, now we have.... all the 2002 new songs minus The Blues
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: DunkinDave on June 26, 2006, 11:18:05 PM Well the topic may be stupid but I would still like opinions so I may entertain myself at the internets expense Your run-on sentences are much more entertaining than we could possibly be. gb2school Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Tomorrows on June 27, 2006, 03:03:43 AM Who fucking cares?
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: estrangedpaul on June 27, 2006, 03:16:42 PM How would calling the album after the original old band's name represent a new beginning? Old does not equal new, obviously!
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: gin hotel on June 27, 2006, 03:49:44 PM it was called SHAG before axl changed his mind to chinese democracy
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Timmy on June 27, 2006, 04:04:48 PM I hear he's hired Ted Nugent and Sebastian Bach and is calling this album "Chinese Damnocracy"
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: CheapJon on June 27, 2006, 04:18:41 PM Some things are different in the NewGNR world... in the past the only song in which the title wasnt on the lyrics was Estranged, now we have.... all the 2002 new songs minus The Blues in 2002 rhiad and the bedouins has the song title in the lyrics as well not only the blues.. "Rhiad and the Bedouins Had a plan and thought they'd win" see there you have it.. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Origen on June 27, 2006, 04:20:32 PM Some things are different in the NewGNR world... in the past the only song in which the title wasnt on the lyrics was Estranged, now we have.... all the 2002 new songs minus The Blues ha never noticed that before, interesting. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Tomorrows on June 27, 2006, 07:42:37 PM Some things are different in the NewGNR world... in the past the only song in which the title wasnt on the lyrics was Estranged, now we have.... all the 2002 new songs minus The Blues ha never noticed that before, interesting. Are you saying that none of the new songs have the title in the lyrics? Hello? Better IRS There was a Time Rhiad (as someone mentioned) Catcher in the Rye The only ones that dont have the title are Chinese Democracy, Madagascar and Silkworms. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: CheapJon on June 27, 2006, 07:58:39 PM Some things are different in the NewGNR world... in the past the only song in which the title wasnt on the lyrics was Estranged, now we have.... all the 2002 new songs minus The Blues ha never noticed that before, interesting. Are you saying that none of the new songs have the title in the lyrics? Hello? Better IRS There was a Time Rhiad (as someone mentioned) Catcher in the Rye The only ones that dont have the title are Chinese Democracy, Madagascar and Silkworms. No he aint saying that.. the guy was talking about the songs they played live 2002, Chinese Democracy, Madagascar, Silkworms and the blues.. he wasn't talking about the leaks.. and out of those 4 madagascar and silkworms don't have the title in the lyrics but the blues and rhiad does.. read it all before trying to be a smartass : ok: Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: HoldenCaulfield on June 27, 2006, 08:28:14 PM Enough people are whining about the band using the GNR name as of now, a self-titled album wouldn't go over well...
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Lowrlder54 on June 27, 2006, 08:39:56 PM Maybe he likes the title "Chinese Democracy"
Yes thats probably it, hes like its and thats why he is using it. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: BLS-Pride on June 27, 2006, 08:57:20 PM Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: The Estranged MrFlashbax on June 27, 2006, 11:15:19 PM if he can go around biting people in the leg, he can name his album whatever he wants.. he can name it "smurf's revenge" or sometihng and itll still sell :hihi:
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: McDuff on June 28, 2006, 12:14:19 AM if he can go around biting people in the leg, he can name his album whatever he wants.. he can name it "smurf's revenge" or sometihng and itll still sell :hihi: :hihi: now that was a good post :beer: Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: phi_kai_phi on June 28, 2006, 12:16:42 AM calling it "Guns N Roses" would make me think that the band is trying to convince the world that they are "guns n roses", kinda like one of those iffy girls that wear "Im too hottt to handle" type of shirts.
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: AxlsMainMan on June 28, 2006, 10:19:34 AM calling it "Guns N Roses" would make me think that the band is trying to convince the world that they are "guns n roses", kinda like one of those iffy girls that wear "Im too hottt to handle" type of shirts. Keeping the name has always been in Axl's best interest, both sales and marketing wise.. : ok: Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: AxlFink on June 28, 2006, 10:34:29 AM is this the same person that wondered if there would be outros? I think Ive made like one new topic in the past year. I always stop myself and ask myself is it really important enough to post? and the answer for myself has been no every time.
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: alternativemonkey on June 28, 2006, 11:41:33 AM I would prefer to think about it this way: Before, GNR had an album without a title track Now, GNR has a title track without an album I would prefer the former over the later. ;D Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: mikegiuliana on June 28, 2006, 11:43:01 AM Which one was going to be 2000 intentions?
I hate albums named after bands more Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: AXL 20 on June 28, 2006, 12:00:31 PM i personally hate most albums named after songs because its kind of stupid. unless the name is really cool like Slave to the Grind.
its not gonna change now, so this is kinda useless. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: deanaxlrose on June 28, 2006, 12:13:44 PM i personally hate most albums named after songs because its kind of stupid. unless the name is really cool like Slave to the Grind. who knows? but Chinesse Democracy is better than Axl and the JU JU Hounds.its not gonna change now, so this is kinda useless. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Catt on June 28, 2006, 12:17:37 PM hes axl he can do what he wants, this topic is dumb and stupid Resuming everything like this is dumb and stupid ::) Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Krispy Kreme on June 28, 2006, 12:42:21 PM if he can go around biting people in the leg, he can name his album whatever he wants.. he can name it "smurf's revenge" or sometihng and itll still sell? :hihi: How about 'Swedes taste better'? :rofl: Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Lowrlder54 on June 28, 2006, 02:23:46 PM I think there should be a purely instrumental tracks as well.
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: ryan_of_lax on June 28, 2006, 03:06:21 PM Maybe Chinese Democracy, the song, won't be on the Chinese Democracy album?
Foo Fighters have a song called The Colour And The Shape, but it wasn't on the CD of the same name. Same goes for Blind Melon and "Soup." I think that would be pretty cool, in a strange way. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: chinesedemocracy05 on June 28, 2006, 03:52:55 PM Some things are different in the NewGNR world... in the past the only song in which the title wasnt on the lyrics was Estranged, now we have.... all the 2002 new songs minus The Blues Uh riyadh, better, twat, irs, Oh my god, Catcher in the rye all have the title in the lyrics. Chinese Democracy, Silkworms, and Madagascar are the only new songs that don't mention the title in the lyrics. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: WARose on June 28, 2006, 04:00:32 PM chinese democracy has to be the coolest album title ever imo : ok:
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Catt on June 28, 2006, 06:44:24 PM chinese democracy has to be the coolest album title ever imo : ok: libertad is a great title :hihi: really Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Tomorrows on June 28, 2006, 07:27:26 PM I think there should be a purely instrumental tracks as well. I dunno. The reason most people will buy this album is to hear Axl. ... Hell, thats why Ill get it (much as I love the other guys). Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: axl_rose_700 on June 28, 2006, 07:30:46 PM self titled albums are annoyin as fuck in my opinion
Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: dizzy68 on June 28, 2006, 07:42:58 PM Should have just named the damn thing "INVISIBLE" :hihi: Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Martina on June 28, 2006, 07:44:44 PM Should have just named the damn thing "INVISIBLE"? ?:hihi: yeah,just like your brain. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: AxlFink on June 28, 2006, 11:18:03 PM Maybe Chinese Democracy, the song, won't be on the Chinese Democracy album? and led zep did the same as well. Foo Fighters have a song called The Colour And The Shape, but it wasn't on the CD of the same name. Same goes for Blind Melon and "Soup." I think that would be pretty cool, in a strange way. Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: Tomorrows on June 28, 2006, 11:46:22 PM Maybe Chinese Democracy, the song, won't be on the Chinese Democracy album? and led zep did the same as well. Foo Fighters have a song called The Colour And The Shape, but it wasn't on the CD of the same name. Same goes for Blind Melon and "Soup." I think that would be pretty cool, in a strange way. And Queen. It confuses the fuck out of a lot of people. Houses of the Holy was a killer song too, should have made the (also killer) album : ok: Title: Re: I dont understand why we have a title track now Post by: chinesedemocracy05 on June 28, 2006, 11:49:42 PM I dont understand why someone is playing that guitar with 2 strings missing from it.
|