Title: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Yesterdaze on June 25, 2006, 11:32:17 PM I know there has to be one person out there who agrees with me.
For those of you who continually refer to the GN'R Live record as" Live Era", please consider this: GUNS N' ROSES LIVE ERA '87 - '93 Say the above with the colors representing pauses like they were intended on the packaging. The above is to accurately show you that "LIVE" and "ERA" do not go together. I've heard over and over, "What band doesn't have a live era?" That's not the point. The people who keep saying "Live Era" are the ones that do the confusing. The two disc set has nothing to do with seperating GN'R's time from the studio to the stage. It's a "Live" record, with the 1987-1993 era of the band playing. Live Era suggests that GN'R had a studio only era. That's not the intention. As you can clearly see, the colors seperate the words that go together. The record should simply called "Live" for those who like to shorten it. By calling it "Live Era", it would be similar to calling Guns N' Roses Live At The Hammerstein, "Live At" The record was obviously made to allow any post 1999 recordings to be on a follow-up "Live" record, perhaps called GUNS N' ROSES LIVE ERA '01 - '07 It's the same as Van Halen Greatest Hits Volume One, which indicates there will be a Volume Two. There is no A without a B. Some people would be going "Live Era 2?" No, read again. Anyways, this has always been a pet peeve of mine. I don't mean to offend anyone, although no doubt people will be pissed off. Someone has to agree, no? "Live Era" is totally out of context. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Mr_Brownface on June 25, 2006, 11:51:02 PM Are you some kinda idiot?
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Tomorrows on June 26, 2006, 01:32:55 AM Err ...
... ... *backs slowly away* Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: TrueRock&Roll on June 26, 2006, 01:47:51 AM Err ... that's the funniest shit. Love how you put that... ... *backs slowly away* Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Niko on June 26, 2006, 02:29:43 AM Err ... ... ... *backs slowly away* i wanted to write something like this but i cant top this :hihi: :hihi: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Mama Kin on June 26, 2006, 02:36:57 AM These pretzels are making me thirsty!
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: EccoTides on June 26, 2006, 02:37:37 AM Sheer genius. : ok:
*golf clap* ... *didn't understand a word* Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: ClintroN on June 26, 2006, 03:01:25 AM I know there has to be one person out there who agrees with me. For those of you who continually refer to the GN'R Live record as" Live Era", please consider this: GUNS N' ROSES LIVE ERA '87 - '93 Say the above with the colors representing pauses like they were intended on the packaging. The above is to accurately show you that "LIVE" and "ERA" do not go together. I've heard over and over, "What band doesn't have a live era?" That's not the point. The people who keep saying "Live Era" are the ones that do the confusing. The two disc set has nothing to do with seperating GN'R's time from the studio to the stage. It's a "Live" record, with the 1987-1993 version of the band playing. Live Era suggests that GN'R had a studio only era. That's not the intention. As you can clearly see, the colors seperate the words that go together. The record should simply called "Live" for those who like to shorten it. By calling it "Live Era", it would be similar to calling Guns N' Roses Live At The Hammerstein, "Live At" The record was obviously made to allow any post 1999 recordings to be on a follow-up "Live" record, perhaps GUNS N' ROSES LIVE ERA '01 - '07 Some people would be going "Live Era 2?" No, read again. Anyways, this has always been a pet peeve of mine. I don't mean to offend anyone, although no doubt people will be pissed off. Someone has to agree, no? "Live Era" is totally out of context. your off tap, mate!! ......:o :o Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: SkinnyPuppy on June 26, 2006, 03:12:31 AM Nah dude...thats a good point u have there....I never thought of it that way..
its Gnr Live... maybe those design fuckers should have used brackets (Era 87-93) or some shit like that....its IS really a mistake that weve made! Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Yesterdaze on June 26, 2006, 03:28:08 AM I'm just saying, that's why the color of wording of the title is different. People that say "Live Era" give the wrong context of what the title of the album is all about. I wasn't bashing anyone, I'm just sure that most are accustomed to saying "Live Era" and never knew the wiser. It's indeed Guns N' Roses... Live... Era '87 - '93. "Era" belongs with " '87 - '93", not "Live". It's pretty simple. I just wanted to point that out and all I got was flamed for it.
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Solidius on June 26, 2006, 03:47:02 AM So in a nutshell, what you're saying is that its:
Guns N' Roses Live: Era '87-'93, Not Guns N' Roses: Live Era '87-'93? Pretty smart, never saw it that way! Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Shirell on June 26, 2006, 03:49:34 AM Doh!
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Yesterdaze on June 26, 2006, 03:59:32 AM Yes. Everyone, go grab your cd case and take a look for yourself. The title was colored differently for a reason. Saying "Live Era" is totally out of context. Here is what my case says:
Guns N' Roses Live Era '87 - '93 "Live" and "Era" are two totally different colors because they don't go together. (http://www.hardrockin80s.com/pictures/az_2807_Live%20Era%20'87-'93_Guns%20N'%20Roses.jpg) Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: mlewis on June 26, 2006, 05:55:55 AM It actually would have been clearer if they had called it Guns n' Roses Live 87-93, and ditched 'era' entirely. A problem like that should have been picked up in the cover design period.
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: artfromtex on June 26, 2006, 07:22:02 AM Yes. Everyone, go grab your cd case and take a look for yourself. The title was colored differently for a reason. Saying "Live Era" is totally out of context. Here is what my case says: Guns N' Roses Live Era '87 - '93 "Live" and "Era" are two totally different colors because they don't go together. (http://www.hardrockin80s.com/pictures/az_2807_Live%20Era%20'87-'93_Guns%20N'%20Roses.jpg) sorry you got flamed. what you said made perfect sense and it was an "oh yeah" moment for me. i always thought that "Live Era" sounded stupid. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: tomass74 on June 26, 2006, 07:58:55 AM Guns N' Roses 87 - 93 Are Evil
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Miggy on June 26, 2006, 08:10:29 AM :rofl: This is too funny reading material.
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: MeanBone on June 26, 2006, 08:16:54 AM he might me on to something, even if it wishful thinking, that's a good point.
era 87 -93, and hopefully something else now. live era doesn't even make a whole lotta sense together, cuz then u'd think that's the only period the band played live. there were lot's of live performances after. that was just one period. hopefully we'll see more "live" albums from gn'r, from different eras! Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: deanaxlrose on June 26, 2006, 11:50:47 AM Guns N' Roses 87 - 93 Are Evil featuring :Oral Sex in leads vocals.Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Ines_rocks! on June 26, 2006, 01:23:49 PM god I wasted almost 10 min of my time to try to figure out what the hell u were trying to say.... :confused:
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: sesor on June 26, 2006, 01:35:12 PM hehe this is so funny, everyones all like "ohh but the colours!"
teehee ^.^ it made me giggle. but seriously, yeah there is a point. not thought of that before tbh. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: AmyRose on June 26, 2006, 01:35:42 PM Is this guy serious?.....Amazing. ?What the hell is he saying? What a waste.
Anyway... that "Live Era" album is great. ?:hihi: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: oldgunsfan on June 26, 2006, 02:01:57 PM Some people have way too much time on their hands to think about GnR live album titles and coloring on them....but of course, I read the thread so i shouldn't talk :hihi: :-X
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Tomorrows on June 26, 2006, 07:46:01 PM Is this guy serious?.....Amazing. What the hell is he saying? What a waste. Anyway... that "Live Era" album is great. :hihi: What hes saying could be said in under two sentences. Basically the use of the word "era" in the album title gets people mistakenly thinking that Guns only had one live era. Very profound :confused: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Bill 213 on June 26, 2006, 07:50:15 PM I know there has to be one person out there who agrees with me. For those of you who continually refer to the GN'R Live record as" Live Era", please consider this: GUNS N' ROSES LIVE ERA '87 - '93 Say the above with the colors representing pauses like they were intended on the packaging. The above is to accurately show you that "LIVE" and "ERA" do not go together. I've heard over and over, "What band doesn't have a live era?" That's not the point. The people who keep saying "Live Era" are the ones that do the confusing. The two disc set has nothing to do with seperating GN'R's time from the studio to the stage. It's a "Live" record, with the 1987-1993 era of the band playing. Live Era suggests that GN'R had a studio only era. That's not the intention. As you can clearly see, the colors seperate the words that go together. The record should simply called "Live" for those who like to shorten it. By calling it "Live Era", it would be similar to calling Guns N' Roses Live At The Hammerstein, "Live At" The record was obviously made to allow any post 1999 recordings to be on a follow-up "Live" record, perhaps called GUNS N' ROSES LIVE ERA '01 - '07 It's the same as Van Halen Greatest Hits Volume One, which indicates there will be a Volume Two. There is no A without a B. Some people would be going "Live Era 2?" No, read again. Anyways, this has always been a pet peeve of mine. I don't mean to offend anyone, although no doubt people will be pissed off. Someone has to agree, no? "Live Era" is totally out of context. This is by far the most pointless post in HTGTH history. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Saul on June 26, 2006, 07:52:15 PM Appetite For Destruction!
Use Your Illusion! Color Coded thought provoking album names Starts now! Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Better on June 26, 2006, 08:14:52 PM colors are so cool guys
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: sesor on June 26, 2006, 08:15:56 PM wow....look at the pretty colours dude.... :smoking:
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Verse Chorus Verse on June 27, 2006, 12:33:05 AM Appetite For Destruction! Try this:Use Your Illusion! Color Coded thought provoking album names Starts now! Guns N' Roses Use Your Illusion I Guns N' Roses Use Your Illusion II Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Filipe_Guns on June 27, 2006, 01:13:45 AM whats the fuckin difference?
we're gonna always call it "Live Era", if you wanna do diferrent ok, its up to you, if the other people can understand what I meaning I dont care for what the fuck is right or wrong. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: ClintroN on June 27, 2006, 04:25:14 AM live ERA 87- 93, which means between those years....easy :o
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: tomass74 on June 27, 2006, 08:00:20 AM Guns N' Roses 87 - 93 Are Evil featuring :Oral Sex in leads vocals.hahah Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Locomotive98 on June 27, 2006, 08:55:12 AM This thread is funny. I was just thinking on Sunday when listening to the cd that its not called 'Live Era' at all. Just makes no sense!
Hes right you know - but knock him anyway eh guys?! Nice one..... Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Tomorrows on June 27, 2006, 09:08:39 AM This thread is funny. I was just thinking on Sunday when listening to the cd that its not called 'Live Era' at all. Just makes no sense! Hes right you know - but knock him anyway eh guys?! Nice one..... He has a point but: a. its big time dead horse b. its lost in a sea of pointless words and colours Like if George W. Bush made a speech in a clown suit and afro no one would listen to what the fuck he had to say. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Locomotive98 on June 27, 2006, 09:12:43 AM This thread is funny. I was just thinking on Sunday when listening to the cd that its not called 'Live Era' at all. Just makes no sense! Hes right you know - but knock him anyway eh guys?! Nice one..... He has a point but: a. its big time dead horse b. its lost in a sea of pointless words and colours Like if George W. Bush made a speech in a clown suit and afro no one would listen to what the fuck he had to say. Do people listen to Bush when hes not dressed in a clown suit? A clown out of his suit is still a clown. Id rather listen to my own dying heartbeat than to what that ignorant fool garbles from his mouth. Anyways, this isnt a Bush thread, so Ill hush up..... Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: Bravefish on June 30, 2006, 07:58:41 AM I'll agree that is interesting shit...beats the Old GNR vs New GNR shit we read 24/7
Good Post Fish Title: Re: Guns N' Roses Live Era 87- '93 Post by: sesor on June 30, 2006, 08:43:27 AM Yes. Everyone, go grab your cd case and take a look for yourself. The title was colored differently for a reason. Saying "Live Era" is totally out of context. Here is what my case says: Guns N' Roses Live Era '87 - '93 "Live" and "Era" are two totally different colors because they don't go together. (http://www.hardrockin80s.com/pictures/az_2807_Live%20Era%20'87-'93_Guns%20N'%20Roses.jpg) awh you could atleats get the colours the right way round :( |