Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Guns N' Roses => Guns N' Roses => Topic started by: GnR-NOW on May 30, 2006, 10:07:12 PM



Title: What if ...
Post by: GnR-NOW on May 30, 2006, 10:07:12 PM
Sorry if this doesn't belong, but I was thinking what if GNR where to surprise everyone and do a show with just the new material except for WTTJ and PC, and the in between songs would be The Blues, CD, Madagascar, Better, IRS, CITR, TWAT, Ryhiad, and OMG.  Would they be praised for their bravery for trying out all new material in one show, or would they be criticized for not playing more classics and disappointing their fans.  I would like to see for the upcoming US tour, to see GNR play 10 classics, and 10 new songs.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: Steel_Angel on May 30, 2006, 10:09:10 PM
that would be the shit but most people would want to hear the old songs more till CD is released.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: The Dog on May 30, 2006, 10:28:31 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something  :hihi:


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 30, 2006, 10:55:31 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something? :hihi:
Performing a bunch of songs from an album thats been hyped continuously? Cant imagine any GNR fans bitching about that.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: Back Off Bitch on May 30, 2006, 11:12:19 PM
I wouldn't care if they played ALL new songs...

At Hammerstein, the whole time I was waiting for Better, Madagascar & TWAT... Oh My God never played though  :-[


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: The Dog on May 30, 2006, 11:20:51 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something  :hihi:
Performing a bunch of songs from an album thats been hyped continuously? Cant imagine any GNR fans bitching about that.

Trust me...SOMEONE would complain about SOMETHING!!!!  These are GNR fans we're talking about!  :hihi:


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 30, 2006, 11:24:40 PM
Trust me...SOMEONE would complain about SOMETHING!!!!? These are GNR fans we're talking about!? :hihi:
Yeah, his hair was out of place, or the camera wasn't on Finck long enough. :rofl:


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: Jim Bob on May 30, 2006, 11:28:10 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something  :hihi:
Performing a bunch of songs from an album thats been hyped continuously? Cant imagine any GNR fans bitching about that.
maybe us hardcore fans, but the majority of the people at the GNR gigs go to hear songs like Jungle and November Rain.   To the people who never heard the leaks or aren't on the boards all the time, thats all they know is Appetite and the Illusions.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: Mattattack on May 30, 2006, 11:30:14 PM
It's pretty simple. The hardcore fans that post on this forum would love it. The casual fans who go to the shows would be pissed off that they didn't get to hear their old favorites. The common theme to almost every thread is this. PUT OUT THE FUCKING ALBUM ALREADY!!! This will allow New GNR to either swim or sink, instead of what they're doing right now, which is floating with a life vest on.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 30, 2006, 11:32:17 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something? :hihi:
Performing a bunch of songs from an album thats been hyped continuously? Cant imagine any GNR fans bitching about that.
maybe us hardcore fans, but the majority of the people at the GNR gigs go to hear songs like Jungle and November Rain.? ?To the people who never heard the leaks or aren't on the boards all the time, thats all they know is Appetite and the Illusions.
I'm not saying people dont want to hear any of the old songs, but people who are going to buy a ticket to see GNR are interested in chinese democracy. If you dont believe that, beg Axl to guarantee he wont release CD this year and proceed with the US tour in September.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: D on May 30, 2006, 11:39:46 PM
Here is my wish list.


WTTJ,SCOM,PC *U have to play those or there would be a riot

UYI: ,NOvember Rain,Dont Cry

Bring in an acoustic portion of the show instead of doing all those boring ass solos and perform

Patience,You're Crazy,Use To Love Her

UYI 2: Civil War,You Could Be Mine


8 new songs from Chinese Democracy


and then have a 4 song rotation to fill in the set and rotate between

Its so easy,Nightrain,Brownstone,Rocket Queen,LALD,KOHD,Estranged, and some other surprises here and there.

Im just sooooooooooooo bored hearing AFD live for the 2000th time.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: HungerForChaos on May 30, 2006, 11:41:15 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something  :hihi:
Performing a bunch of songs from an album thats been hyped continuously? Cant imagine any GNR fans bitching about that.
maybe us hardcore fans, but the majority of the people at the GNR gigs go to hear songs like Jungle and November Rain.   To the people who never heard the leaks or aren't on the boards all the time, thats all they know is Appetite and the Illusions.

So? When they first started, no one heard their songs either, but that's how they get popular! You actually play them when you tour.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: RichardNixon on May 30, 2006, 11:41:26 PM
More new songs once the album is released!


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: The Dog on May 30, 2006, 11:47:18 PM
You'd still have someone bitching about something  :hihi:
Performing a bunch of songs from an album thats been hyped continuously? Cant imagine any GNR fans bitching about that.
maybe us hardcore fans, but the majority of the people at the GNR gigs go to hear songs like Jungle and November Rain.   To the people who never heard the leaks or aren't on the boards all the time, thats all they know is Appetite and the Illusions.
I'm not saying people dont want to hear any of the old songs, but people who are going to buy a ticket to see GNR are interested in chinese democracy. If you dont believe that, beg Axl to guarantee he wont release CD this year and proceed with the US tour in September.

Hmm, we'll have to agree to disagree here.....I don't see how people are going to buy tickets hoping to hear songs that they don't even know exist yet.  It is interesting to think what interest there would be though if Axl didnt' say CD in the fall.....As optimistic as I want to be, I am still only 50/50 on CD being realeased in sept/oct.  We've just had so many push backs.  Truthfully, if guns came back to NYC in Nov. and it was the same set list, I would def go, but not be anywhere as excited as I was in May - but thats b/c I've already seen them.  If I was in someone else's shoes who hasn't seen the 2006 guns I'd be crapping myself in anticipation of hearing Axl live again.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 30, 2006, 11:52:27 PM
Here is my wish list.


WTTJ,SCOM,PC *U have to play those or there would be a riot

UYI: ,NOvember Rain,Dont Cry

Bring in an acoustic portion of the show instead of doing all those boring ass solos and perform

Patience,You're Crazy,Use To Love Her

UYI 2: Civil War,You Could Be Mine


8 new songs from Chinese Democracy


and then have a 4 song rotation to fill in the set and rotate between

Its so easy,Nightrain,Brownstone,Rocket Queen,LALD,KOHD,Estranged, and some other surprises here and there.

Im just sooooooooooooo bored hearing AFD live for the 2000th time.
D, that is the most perfect setlist I have seen yet. Too bad it cant be reality. With September fast approaching, he will have to come up with a setlist resembling what you just posted.
I don't see how people are going to buy tickets hoping to hear songs that they don't even know exist yet.
Really?? Its called 15 years of curiousity. Cd is a myth that will sell tickets. If axl issued a statement tomorrow similar to the 2002 "Soon isnt the word", then all interest drops unless he tours venues the size of a sardine can. Its CD or bust.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: Tomorrows on May 31, 2006, 12:09:45 AM
The boards were be more alive than ever. Fans would rejoice. Haters would scream. Reviews would slam.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: michaelvincent on May 31, 2006, 12:29:29 PM
They can't sustain themselves on the setlist they are doing forever. At some point they need to shit or get off the pot and start getting some of their alleged three albums worth of material out of the vaults and into people's ears. Otherwise things start to become a joke. I give them through the summer to stay with the set they are doing now. After that I'm going to stop taking them so seriously.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: madagas on May 31, 2006, 12:35:11 PM
Things start to become a joke? Are you kidding? I loved the Ny shows I went to but in the end, no album in sight. It is still a "greatest hits" tour-same as 2002 except the band and Axl seem a lot better now. We need an album. :-\


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: anythinggoes on May 31, 2006, 12:36:10 PM
what if you put more thought into the title ?:rant:

until we see CD it will not be happening plus it would be too much in one go


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: kockstar999 on May 31, 2006, 12:43:39 PM
i would be better than hearing the same setlist as before.... i would love it.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: ppbebe on May 31, 2006, 01:05:06 PM
Sorry if this doesn't belong, but I was thinking what if GNR where to surprise everyone and do a show with just the new material except for WTTJ and PC, and the in between songs would be The Blues, CD, Madagascar, Better, IRS, CITR, TWAT, Ryhiad, and OMG.  Would they be praised for their bravery for trying out all new material in one show, or would they be criticized for not playing more classics and disappointing their fans. 

Some Critics might praise but the crowd would be disappointed unless they are all from the fan boards.
I understand They have to do a run with this setlist so that people will be satisfied with the classics and get appetite for the new thing.

I'll praise them when they play only new materials and just a few oldies as extras, hopefully in fall.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: MadmanDan on May 31, 2006, 01:07:33 PM


An all-new songs concert would rule, but why only songs that we know of?
 Madagascar, The Blues, CD, etc. are anything but new to hardcore GNR fans, and the new leaks are gettin old really fast. It's fuckin ridicoulous, so far not one single unheard song.

Fuck Appetite! Fuck 2001/2002 songs that they're "not considering puttin on the album".

They clame to have 30 songs ready. Fuckin prove it !


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: McDuff on May 31, 2006, 01:13:38 PM
Yeah I agree that they need to add some more new songs,but they'll never play all new songs,I mean that there are songs that  they will always have to play,like SCOM,WTTJ,PC,NR  :beer:


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: godiva on May 31, 2006, 01:24:40 PM
I would pay very good money to hear that. And I know I?m not the only one  :peace: Two of us together PP? Private concert?  :hihi:


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: pilferk on May 31, 2006, 01:28:45 PM
Sorry if this doesn't belong, but I was thinking what if GNR where to surprise everyone and do a show with just the new material except for WTTJ and PC, and the in between songs would be The Blues, CD, Madagascar, Better, IRS, CITR, TWAT, Ryhiad, and OMG.? Would they be praised for their bravery for trying out all new material in one show, or would they be criticized for not playing more classics and disappointing their fans.? I would like to see for the upcoming US tour, to see GNR play 10 classics, and 10 new songs.

The die hards would go nuts.

The other 80% of the crowd would likely riot, boo, throw shit and pan the show as the worst thing ever.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: SLCPUNK on May 31, 2006, 01:30:11 PM
Sorry if this doesn't belong, but I was thinking what if GNR where to surprise everyone and do a show with just the new material except for WTTJ and PC, and the in between songs would be The Blues, CD, Madagascar, Better, IRS, CITR, TWAT, Ryhiad, and OMG.  Would they be praised for their bravery for trying out all new material in one show, or would they be criticized for not playing more classics and disappointing their fans.  I would like to see for the upcoming US tour, to see GNR play 10 classics, and 10 new songs.

When you go to see a group, you go to hear their most popular stuff. It's the format most of the time.



Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: pilferk on May 31, 2006, 01:31:45 PM

So? When they first started, no one heard their songs either, but that's how they get popular! You actually play them when you tour.

Rather, you release them on an album.

And remember...those posters that are "bored" of hearing the same old AFD songs:  Not everyone is listening to boots of 5, 10, 15 different shows that we listen to here, as die hards.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: PhillyRiot on May 31, 2006, 01:39:40 PM
Good point.  Most of the fans at these shows are not die hards.  They've never heard the IRS or TWAT.  It would piss off the casual fan if they didn't play a lot of Appetite songs.  That is the fault of not releasing CD.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: pilferk on May 31, 2006, 01:42:52 PM
Good point.? Most of the fans at these shows are not die hards.? They've never heard the IRS or TWAT.? It would piss off the casual fan if they didn't play a lot of Appetite songs.? That is the fault of not releasing CD.

Bingo!

For those of you who want an expanded set list....what you're really routing for is CD.  Because until it hits.....I doubt the set list is going to drastically change from what we've got.  Maybe a couple more UYI tracks thrown in during the tour...maybe rotating in TWAT or CITR (Brian May at Hammersmith??)...but largely the same set list. 

Hopefully, Axl is true to his word and "fall is the word".


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: madagas on May 31, 2006, 01:50:19 PM
People also have to remember that Axl is in quite a predicament. On one hand, the promoters are trying to sell tix and will pay Gnr based on potential tickets sold. At this time, without an album, the average person going to the show will want to hear Axl sing the classics and will be disappointed if they don't. Word spreads that Axl is playing all new material that people don't know, tickets stop being sold. The band makes a lot more money by playing the classics. If the band makes alot more money, then Axl can pay good musicians to actually tour with him and put up with playing songs they didn't write. Make no bones about it, the new band is there in part to make money-they are professionals and need to be paid. Also, you have the problem with the record company. They have invested A TON of money in these new songs and I am quite sure they don't want the entire album on the internet in raw unfinished form prior to it's release. That is not a good way to promote the record as people can be very judgmental and simply not buy the record when it is released based on a shitty bootleg or bad AOL feed. Geffen (and Axl for that matter) has invested alot and will want to keep as much suprise as possible to insure larger first month sales. Thus, by using the Gnr name, Axl does make a lot more money and can keep quality players, however, he really has limited options with the new material until the record is released. He has put himself in quite a bind by taking so long to release an album. You have to take the good with the bad. :-\


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: kockstar999 on May 31, 2006, 01:52:31 PM
even if they didnt play all new songs.... if they added 3 or 4 new ones from Lies or UYI that would be better than playing the same setlist everyday... thats pretty chicken shit thing to do...


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: ppbebe on May 31, 2006, 02:21:24 PM
I would pay very good money to hear that. And I know I?m not the only one  :peace: Two of us together PP? Private concert?  :hihi:

Yay! I guess MadmanDan and a few others love to join us. Or maybe not. just the band and the 2 of us. :D :D
Quote
The band makes a lot more money by playing the classics. If the band makes alot more money, then Axl can pay good musicians to actually tour with him and put up with playing songs they didn't write. Make no bones about it, the new band is there in part to make money-

Besides the band members really enjoy playing the classics of their band. No way they'd prefer that than playing new songs. but in reality no musician can put a huge crowd into an uproar over a yet to be released song. The audience are not ready either.  A good performer trys to amuse their audience maximum.
They won't have this set list after the release so why not enjoy it till then. Meanwhile people get used to those amazing musicians.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: D on May 31, 2006, 06:36:46 PM
Axl needs to do like Prince did on his "One Nite Alone' Tour.

Prince was playing all new material from his Rainbow Children CD so he played tiny theaters that held about 2,000.

People knew in advance before buying tickets that "IF u are here to get your Purple Rain on, u are in the wrong place"

The shows still sold out, the crowds got to hear all new material and they didnt feel cheated cause they knew in advance.

Granted he still through in 5 or 6 HITS but it was almost entirely new material.


Axl could do the same.

Play WTTJ,PC,SCOM,NR,YCBM,Patience for the casual fans

and then play 8-12 new songs.



Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: A Private Eye on May 31, 2006, 07:00:22 PM
Having never seen Axl/GNR live before hearing the AFD rehash won't bother me but I can see why it does bother some fans. A good setlist imo until CD is out would be 5-6 AFD songs similar number of UYI but drop LALD put in Yesterdays or something just to mix the UYI list up a bit, a 2-3 song acoustic section and then the 6 new songs from CD. That's in no particular order either just numbers of songs I'd like played from each album.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: BD888 on May 31, 2006, 08:14:37 PM
I think in addition to PC & WTTJ, you have to have either Nightrain/It's So Easy or OTGM/Brownstone as well as NR and YCBM.

SCOM is their most well known song, so you that's has to be played.

If I was Axl, I would drop It's So Easy and Mr Brownstone from the setlist because Velvet Revolver play it at all their gigs.  I really enjoyd hearing Axl sing it at RIR5 with his renewed vigour but all & all I'd drop it to avoid any comparisons with VR.

I'm getting tired of Patience but it's a good slow song, so I'll keep that.

KOHD and LALD are defintely out.  Fuck playing covers that we've heard a hundred times and that are on the Illusion albums already.

So if I chose old songs from the current set lists, the songs that must stay would be:

AFD - WTTJ, Nightrain, Paradise City, Rocket Queen
Lies - Patience
UYI - November Rain, Don't Cry, YCBM

CD - Better, The Blues, TWAT, I.R.S.,  Madagascar

Then you could change up the other songs with songs like Chinese Democracy, Estranged, Think About You, You're Crazy (mix version-that would be very cool), Civil War, CITR, OTGM and if we have to have some covers,  then let's have something new each time!


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 31, 2006, 08:25:48 PM
If I was Axl, I would drop It's So Easy and Mr Brownstone from the setlist because Velvet Revolver play it at all their gigs.? I really enjoyd hearing Axl sing it at RIR5 with his renewed vigour but all & all I'd drop it to avoid any comparisons with VR.
Axl doesn't have to drop anything to avoid VR comparisons. He is the original singer of GNR songs. Just because Weiland sings them dont mean shit.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: jsg2295 on May 31, 2006, 08:32:13 PM
Axl needs to do like Prince did on his "One Nite Alone' Tour.

Prince was playing all new material from his Rainbow Children CD so he played tiny theaters that held about 2,000.

People knew in advance before buying tickets that "IF u are here to get your Purple Rain on, u are in the wrong place"

The shows still sold out, the crowds got to hear all new material and they didnt feel cheated cause they knew in advance.

Granted he still through in 5 or 6 HITS but it was almost entirely new material.


Axl could do the same.

Play WTTJ,PC,SCOM,NR,YCBM,Patience for the casual fans

and then play 8-12 new songs.


or He could do what Prince did and sing on American idol!!!


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: Dead N' Bloated on May 31, 2006, 08:47:07 PM
Metallica did a show like that in 98 for the Gararge Inc album. They played all covers from the album from start to finish. That went down ok but I think Guns would get a better reception concidering they would not be playin covers.


 :peace:




Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: badapple81 on May 31, 2006, 08:53:33 PM
Axl needs to do like Prince did on his "One Nite Alone' Tour.


I don't think he needs to at all, judging by the crowds and receptions GN'R are received so far  :)

Later on towards the US leg, you'll hear more new songs.


Title: Re: What if ...
Post by: GnR-NOW on May 31, 2006, 09:21:59 PM
So like mentioned before and I agree, its pretty much the same setlist as the 2002 tour plus Better, TWAT, and IRS, and the band is playing much better and look better as well,  in 2002 there was alot of negative media attention, now their getting positive media attention, why?.  So is the outcome going to be different this time around?