Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Guns N' Roses => Guns N' Roses => Topic started by: leatherebel on May 17, 2006, 12:59:16 PM



Title: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: leatherebel on May 17, 2006, 12:59:16 PM
RazZ has posted this on his web site:
http://illitpress.com/060517.htm

So, I checked with Merck about this trying to clear things up. This is what he had to say:

"Please let everyone know that with the exception of Saturday when I received an email congratulating us on the 1st show I have not had an email from Razz since the 14th of April. Both were answered so his blog is a load of bollocks."


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: gnr2006 on May 17, 2006, 01:01:49 PM
Can't you just drop this? The other topic got locked for a reason.

Stop giving this guy so much publicity. Cry me a fucking river, so he thinks he's a hero. If you shoot someone in the face once, but the second time you decide not to shoot someone, it doesn't make you a fucking hero.



Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: blaqktiger on May 17, 2006, 01:03:15 PM
A load of Bollocks.... nice one Merck  8)


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: Mr.Intensity on May 17, 2006, 01:05:26 PM
FROM RAZZ'S BLOG:
"Otherwise, how bout a "Checkmate" chant tonight at the show? Or "You fucked RazZ", with pointing at Merck.

Good? Good"



The Razz guy is a fucking idiot, a "Checkmate" chant or a "razz chant"...what a masterpiece.... I'm seriously dead over here laughing. :rofl:

He did deliver the songs though..... so he knows someone with a disc.


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: DunkinDave on May 17, 2006, 01:07:43 PM
So RazZ gets a free ticket from Merck, and yet he's telling him to fuck off.

Ok then.

The guy should get off the internet and go see a psychiatrist.


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: Axl8302 on May 17, 2006, 01:20:17 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: Mr.Intensity on May 17, 2006, 01:21:44 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.

Yeah, he played that shitball Irs and I almost had a heart attack laughing too... I say Axl should drop a Razz Radio banner for him in his honor though tonight... :hihi:


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: eraser on May 17, 2006, 02:49:03 PM
ok i know this guy is trying to get some attention and traffic for his website...

but he did put up that clip, and it seems real..

so why is everybody trashing the guy?

I don't care about his site, radio and won't click on his ads.. but he seems to be the first to have the clip.. so why not listening to what he says?

sorry i'm just trying to catch up with this story.. i never heard of him before so i don't know anything about credibility...

 ???


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: Mr.Intensity on May 17, 2006, 02:58:44 PM
I really have no clue what happened with him, but I did listen to his show and he stated before "The record label is calling me, telling me not to play these songs, sending me letters, but I'm still going too play these songs, etc.... "

He keeps trying to advertise that he is in contact with guns management and the record label, yet continues to advertise and play leaked songs.. which is really wierd. My guess is that he was talking out of his ass at first and just trying to get his site some publicity but he was finally contacted by someone and told to STOP... because he did have that new song "checkmate"... so maybe he got wasted and now wrote this elaborate story... maybe he'd rather have internet exposure than care about possible consequences for leaking songs on the internet...

the guy seems like a nutcase though.. asking for "razz" chants at the gnr shows... :hihi:


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: gnr2006 on May 17, 2006, 03:01:46 PM
yeah doesn't he realize these shows are for the real fans, and not for attention seeking whores to get there name chanted?

His site hasn't even hit 100,000 hits all time ( http://www.webstats4u.com/s?tab=1&link=1&id=2979827
) yet in around 2 years. Sorry dude, but you REALLY aren't that important.






Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: dave-gnfnr2k on May 18, 2006, 07:40:54 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.

It was not fake, its legit, i have heard the whole thing and its a different vocal track completely and it doesnt have BH on the track at all


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: Jimmy? on May 18, 2006, 07:42:11 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.

It was not fake, its legit, i have heard the whole thing and its a different vocal track completely and it doesnt have BH on the track at all

is it a newer recording or do you not know?


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: dave-gnfnr2k on May 18, 2006, 07:42:40 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.

It was not fake, its legit, i have heard the whole thing and its a different vocal track completely and it doesnt have BH on the track at all

is it a newer recording or do you not know?

I think its older. Freese is on drums and there is no bh. I like it better than the version we have not. I miss some of fincks licks but overall the backing synth is better.


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: agropolus on May 18, 2006, 07:43:06 PM
I guess it's quite old then, 1999 or 2000 when BH was still not in the band, I think...


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: Jimmy? on May 18, 2006, 07:43:41 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.

It was not fake, its legit, i have heard the whole thing and its a different vocal track completely and it doesnt have BH on the track at all

is it a newer recording or do you not know?

I think its older. Freese is on drums and there is no bh.

oh right, thats cool man. thanks for the info? :peace:


Title: Re: Merck's Answer to RazZ's blog
Post by: agropolus on May 18, 2006, 07:43:51 PM
razz is just trying to redeem himself for that fake irs he made, pathetic really.

It was not fake, its legit, i have heard the whole thing and its a different vocal track completely and it doesnt have BH on the track at all

is it a newer recording or do you not know?

I think its older. Freese is on drums and there is no bh. I like it better than the version we have not. I miss some of fincks licks but overall the backing synth is better.

How do you know it's Freese?