|
Title: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: GNRBABY on February 22, 2006, 12:50:56 PM Would some of you still say the band wasn't real GNR?
And what if only Izzy rejoined? Would you say they aren't GNR? Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: plasmabeam on February 22, 2006, 07:21:04 PM Right now GN'R doesn't involve Slash or Izzy, so it doesn't matter.
Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: Sam on February 22, 2006, 08:53:44 PM theres a few other topics to this effect...
Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: Grouse on February 22, 2006, 09:14:13 PM The only "real" gnr are :smoking::
Axl Slash Steven Izzy Duff It's as simple as that Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: Cooker on February 24, 2006, 08:39:00 PM There was a GN'R before Slash, so its still GN'R after slash.
Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: Communist China on February 25, 2006, 12:54:01 AM Real GN'R needs Axl and Slash definitely, and Izzy certainly helps a lot too.
To Grouse: Steven?! Really? So UYI isn't real Guns except for Civil War? Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: jmapelian on February 25, 2006, 02:45:02 AM There was a GN'R before Slash, so its still GN'R after slash. that may be true...........as we all know you got that from an Axl quote...............but gnR wasnt GnR until Slash came around.......... or how bout this one, if Slash never came around, would we even be talking about Axl Rose because i know nobody was talking about him b4 Slash as valid as that statement is.......because it is true...............it's also extremely flimsy Title: Re: If only Slash and Axl where in GNR... Post by: mikegiuliana on February 25, 2006, 04:08:28 AM Would some of you still say the band wasn't real GNR? And what if only Izzy rejoined? Would you say they aren't GNR? i don't know if i'd call it gnr but the two major faces of gnr that most people know woul be back |