|
Title: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: mikegiuliana on February 20, 2006, 07:38:01 AM they did bands second time around kind of thing in the most recent issue I recieved in the mail.. (march 06 kristen bell on the cover)
SHUT UP AGAIN (second time around) GNR VMA apperance 2002 -shows pic of BH next to text OK, so replacing slash at the 2002vmas with a dude wearing a kfc bucket on his head was an inspired little fuck you to slash but after watching botoxed looking axl rose emerge from his undisclosed location to shake his cornrows while his glorified cover band plodded through a medley of gnr hits, we're kind of glad Gn'R part 2 cancelled their planned world tour Sometimes it's better to burn out than fade away, reunite gouge the fans and shit all over your rock legacy.. Other two mentions were th eagles 94 hell freezes over tour and the sex pistols filthy lucre tour 96 Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: Dr. Blutarsky on February 20, 2006, 07:45:34 AM Maxim is my #1 source for music! :hihi:
Stick with the revealing pics! Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: mikegiuliana on February 20, 2006, 07:46:31 AM Maxim is my #1 source for music! :hihi: Stick with the revealing pics! I think they speak like the typical joe that just saw the vmas only that once new guns.... Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: RichardNixon on February 20, 2006, 07:47:14 AM Mike- This isn't an attack on you personally, but it almost seems to me as though you want the new band to fail.There have been plenty of positive comments and feedback from people (airplay on WAAF, enthusiastic fan reviews) yet you seem to cherry-pick and only post the negative.
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: Dont Try Me on February 20, 2006, 07:49:00 AM who cares what maxim says..... you can't take commenst like that seriously anyways
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: mikegiuliana on February 20, 2006, 07:50:10 AM Mike- This isn't an attack on you personally, but it almost seems to me as though you want the new band to fail.There have been plenty of positive comments and feedback from people (airplay on WAAF, enthusiastic fan reviews) yet you seem to cherry-pick and only post the negative. I guess you haven;t been checking all my positive reviews on the new tracks... ?? ?Me posting something gnr related that happens to be in a new mag I got doesn't mean I want anyone to fail... Everything can't be positive, butr I'll tell you one thing if maxim ssaid new gnr wave of the future it would have been posted already : ok: it's not meant to be taken seriously it's a swimsuit mag, but I'm sure if it said something positive it would be cheered upon Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: RichardNixon on February 20, 2006, 07:53:16 AM Ok, fair enough...
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: mikegiuliana on February 20, 2006, 08:00:44 AM Ok, fair enough... thanks, I am honestly on my 30th listen of better,,, I keep hoping it extends each time :hihi: Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: Dont Try Me on February 20, 2006, 08:03:57 AM Ok, fair enough... thanks, I am honestly on my 30th listen of better,,, I keep hoping it extends each time :hihi: :hihi: I wonder 'why' the leaking guys did that? There must be a reason for it....... perhaps the music after that point changes like the weather, contrast..... I'd like to think that anyways. ;D Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: jameslofton29 on February 20, 2006, 08:07:19 AM Does Maxim always take that stance? Or are they like Blender and give both positive and negative mentions? I haven't been a subscriber to Maxim in a few years.
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: mikegiuliana on February 20, 2006, 08:08:48 AM Does Maxim always take that stance? Or are they like Blender and give both positive and negative mentions? I haven't been a subscriber to Maxim in a few years. I think they tend to bash, they once had a poll called DEad or Bloated... They had axl vince neil etc and you had to guess who got heavy or who was dead Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: speed-stone on February 20, 2006, 09:05:42 AM max who? ???
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: DoubleTalkingJive on February 20, 2006, 10:14:24 AM Does Maxim always take that stance? Or are they like Blender and give both positive and negative mentions? I haven't been a subscriber to Maxim in a few years. I didn't even know Maxim had a section for Music :P Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: plasmabeam on February 20, 2006, 11:03:35 AM Maxim is a joke. I remember seeing them reviewing a rather good videogame and giving it a mediocre score. Sure... they're entitled to their opinion, but why should a magazine that focuses on women be bothering with videogames and GN'R? ???
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: mikegiuliana on February 20, 2006, 11:09:05 AM they have like an blum review music section ,movie section game section... it's just one mag's view..
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: Communist China on February 20, 2006, 11:49:47 AM If you never ever saw any other show of New GN'R or never heard a new song by New GN'R I guess I would've felt that way too. But they should do a little more research than that.
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: ppbebe on February 20, 2006, 11:52:44 AM I thought of the singer of prodigy :P
Title: Re: maxim disses gnr's second time around Post by: SLCPUNK on February 20, 2006, 01:07:11 PM "Journalism"
|