Title: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: maddog001 on January 26, 2006, 08:57:48 PM Just the media trying to put a spin on the rolling stones interview.
http://entertainment1.sympatico.msn.ca/Celebs/News/ContentPosting.aspx?contentid=7e25760b2fef420aad3f2979a54e5721&show=False&number=0&showbyline=False&subtitle=&detect=&abc=abc Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Spirit on January 26, 2006, 09:01:33 PM go to news.google.com and search for "guns n roses", you'll find millions of these. I'm really surprised that so many news-sites could misread what the rollingstone article REALLY said...
Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: the dirt on January 26, 2006, 09:03:13 PM yeah, I saw it too on the main page.
It even had a pic (http://stb.msn.com/i/95/955318278D91AC946E9D94B062758BF.jpg) Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: MR W,AXL ROSE on January 27, 2006, 07:26:06 AM from about 10 little sentances that axl spoke recently,there has become about 100 diferent stories.its amazing the effect he has on poeple
Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Sakib on January 27, 2006, 12:50:45 PM what the fuck?????he said fuck all about any reunion. just he spoke to Izzy
Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Markus Asraelius on January 27, 2006, 01:03:51 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over.
Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Walapino on January 27, 2006, 02:10:16 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over. This is a GNR board, its never going to be over and it will eventually happen. Im suprised people still think it wont. Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: avesia on January 27, 2006, 02:18:26 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over. This is a GNR board, its never going to be over and it will eventually happen. Im suprised people still think it wont. Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Dr. Blutarsky on January 27, 2006, 02:19:26 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over. Some people live in the past. Hope GNR can give us a future to look forward to. Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Markus Asraelius on January 27, 2006, 02:22:10 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over. This is a GNR board, its never going to be over and it will eventually happen. Im suprised people still think it wont. I'm suprised people still think it will. I mean it could happen, look at Pink Floyd. But you are a fool if you think there is an above a 10 percent chance of them coming back together. Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: dolphin on January 27, 2006, 04:37:27 PM yeah, I saw it too on the main page. It even had a pic (http://stb.msn.com/i/95/955318278D91AC946E9D94B062758BF.jpg) they could have used a more recent pic Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Walapino on January 27, 2006, 05:56:49 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over. This is a GNR board, its never going to be over and it will eventually happen. Im suprised people still think it wont. I'm suprised people still think it will. I mean it could happen, look at Pink Floyd. But you are a fool if you think there is an above a 10 percent chance of them coming back together. Im a GNR fan above Axl and Slash, I will always think they will (reunite), If I didnt I wouldnt waste my time on a GNR board. I still enjoy their work separated, I think your a fool to think they wont reunite at some point in the future. Im not stupid to say they will this year or next but its gonna happen at some point. The phrase "living in the past" has lost its meaning when nothing has gone in the last 4 years (and more than 10 of any kind of studio cd), GNR fans have to live in the past you silly billy.(to the user who mentioned this I cant quote all) ::) Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: ppbebe on January 27, 2006, 06:42:53 PM I'm a music fan above all and I don't see the old band ever reuniting as a band. one night stand like pink floyd did, maybe. To me, GNR is the current band. I believe GNR is not that halfassed. Otherwise it would be bloody waste of my time to visit a GNR board Now.
On topic, those writers misread info and mislead ppl. They are even worse than a certain site. Do they have piss poor reading comprehensions or they are good at making deliberate distortion? Title: Re: Small article on Axl, nothing new however Post by: Axl4Prez2004 on January 27, 2006, 06:50:27 PM There seems to be a certain number of music fans who just cannot give up that the old g'nr is over. This is a GNR board, its never going to be over and it will eventually happen. Im suprised people still think it wont. I'm suprised people still think it will. I mean it could happen, look at Pink Floyd. But you are a fool if you think there is an above a 10 percent chance of them coming back together. With all due respect, Pink Floyd got back together for one performance, that's it, as far as I know.? Personally, I can't understand how people think there would be a reunion.? The folks who hope for and think there will be a reunion are like wack-job ex-girlfriends who've been dumped and still think they have a shot at a relationship.? Or, a better analogy yet, the children of a divorce who think mommy and daddy will get back together and love each other once again.? ?:hihi:? ?I come to HTGTH for the future of Guns N' Roses, not the ancient history.? ?:beer: |