Title: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mitchejw on October 24, 2005, 08:02:23 PM After reading some of the recent threads, I had a question regarding the morphing of the 1987 version of the band and the UYI version.
I have read that some of you feel the UYI era was a WTF? section of GN'R history. What is do damn bad about growing up? A person grows up, a band grows up, their music matures... I despise the fact that some of you dislike the illusion era...not because you don't like them...but because of the reasons you site for disliking. You've got to give the band credit for breaking new ground instead of getting stale. If you ask me...bands like Metallica and AC DC made the same albums over and over again. If a band could be as versitile as Jungle to Patience to November Rain To Live and Let Die to Since I don't Have you these days, we might have real talent on our hands instead of these one dimensional gay bands that we have to endure now. Axl said something the effect of, "I will not live my life through that one album." I say cheers to that. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: nyd on October 24, 2005, 09:15:00 PM Cool thread! Every band needs to evolve otherwise the 'hype' will soon die out. Even if the new GNR album sucks Axl can be happy because this is how he wanted it to sound. Izzy evolved in 1991 and did what he wanted to, GNR fans can say his solo music sucks but at least he too is doing what he wants :D
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: greekmule on October 25, 2005, 01:12:01 PM every band needs to evolve that goes without sayin
and i hope CD is a step forwards P.S. metallica didnt make the same alboum over and over again Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Neemo on October 25, 2005, 01:33:59 PM My problem with the UYI era gnr was the evolution of the Live show. Tracy and Roberta and gimme some reggae.
But as an aside i don't think the evolution you are talking about came necessarily from the band members getting more mature, but from getting more money and fame. They went from doing what needed to be done to doing what was the biggest and most expensive thing that could be done. As albums the UYI's kicked major ass, but looking back it's obvious that things were unraveling rather rapidly TSI is my WTF evolution part of GnR history Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Lord Kayoss on October 25, 2005, 01:36:33 PM GN'R is but a memory now in pop culture - resting in several pieces.
Evolution may apply if and when CD sees light of day. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: ppbebe on October 25, 2005, 01:56:57 PM Evolution may apply if and when CD sees light of day. it's when and the when is soon, I bet. : ok: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: makemyday on October 25, 2005, 02:22:49 PM If you ask me...bands like Metallica and AC DC made the same albums over and over again. Well, you should listen Justice, then the Black album, then Load. ::) Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Evolution on October 25, 2005, 02:23:21 PM Evolution may apply if and when CD sees light of day. If Uncle Axl has jobs going then damn right i will Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Lord Kayoss on October 25, 2005, 02:57:40 PM Evolution may apply if and when CD sees light of day. it's when and the when is soon, I bet. : ok: Here's to hoping you're correct. :beer: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: 33 on October 25, 2005, 03:43:01 PM After reading some of the recent threads, I had a question regarding the morphing of the 1987 version of the band and the UYI version. I have read that some of you feel the UYI era was a WTF? section of GN'R history. What is do damn bad about growing up? A person grows up, a band grows up, their music matures... I despise the fact that some of you dislike the illusion era...not because you don't like them...but because of the reasons you site for disliking. You've got to give the band credit for breaking new ground instead of getting stale. If you ask me...bands like Metallica and AC DC made the same albums over and over again. If a band could be as versitile as Jungle to Patience to November Rain To Live and Let Die to Since I don't Have you these days, we might have real talent on our hands instead of these one dimensional gay bands that we have to endure now. Axl said something the effect of, "I will not live my life through that one album." I say cheers to that. Mate that is a great post! Fair play on you!! And the next stage of the band evolving is gonna be the new album! Yeh I like your opinion! Good one!! Mike Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: odd1 on October 25, 2005, 03:51:16 PM every band needs to evolve that goes without sayin and i hope CD is a step forwards P.S. metallica didnt make the same alboum over and over again Metallica evolved into shit, that St.anger album really sucks :rant: :drool: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Lord Kayoss on October 25, 2005, 04:00:19 PM P.S. metallica didnt make the same alboum over and over again Sadly. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: nesquick on October 25, 2005, 04:00:27 PM "Evolution" doesn't mean doing suddenly bad music and massively changing your original sound. When I hear "oh my god" or "silkworms" I don't call it an "evolution" for GN'R, I just call it very bad music.
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Neemo on October 25, 2005, 04:39:54 PM "Evolution" doesn't mean doing suddenly bad music and massively changing your original sound. When I hear "oh my god" or "silkworms" I don't call it an "evolution" for GN'R, I just call it very bad music. Here's a definition of evolution: "a process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state" Concerning UYI's there was alot of different sounds on them. So there was an evolution of sorts from AFD for GnR because They were more diversified and they explored lots of different types of songs. Now from UYI's to what we have heard from CD is the Blues a more complex song than say Breakdown, Yesterdays or Don't Cry? Not in my opinion. They are pretty close. In fact i could even see the blues having a place on UYI's Is Madagascar more complicated than Civil War? not really prolly a step back, But that's just me,the sound is more "modern" i guess, for lack of a better term. How does CD or OMG compare to the rockers from UYI's? They're pretty grungy sounding Tons of Distortion not alot of picking. Not even close to YCBM or pretty tied up in my opinion. But again they are way different from them too Every version of Rhiad is pretty crappy and IRS is impossible to hear anything. so my judgement is reserved for those tunes. Silkworms is like a Rave tune or something. Like a parody of Prodigy. Just wayyyyyy, wayyyy to different. Overall I don't think there will be a forward evolution, but more of like a sidestep. I mean the whole band has changed. Of course they are gonna sound different. The thing we should be discussing is Has Axl's lyrics and songwriting evolved from UYI's. It's just not fair to compare these guys to the orig band IMO. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mikegiuliana on October 25, 2005, 04:41:09 PM just remember to most gnr is a one album band so their best was their first
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: jmapelian on October 25, 2005, 04:46:40 PM The evolution of the Illsuion Era is more or less the inclusion of norns, 15 backing vocals, the orchestra etc.
Many of the songs were written pre or same time as AFD Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mikegiuliana on October 25, 2005, 04:49:49 PM everyone alwats loves to knock ac/dc or metallica, yet unlike gnr they had longevity,.. Metallica put out damn good albums longer then gnr did.. So it's possible thayt if gnr continued they were bound to put out some lemons too. With songs like sanitarium, whiplash, fade to black, for whom the bell tolls, master of puppets, damn the black album.. They did major epic rockers that fucking kicked ass.. Either way ac/dc or metallica can sell out any venues they play.. To me the black album shoed a different sidfe to metallica
Metallica and ac/dc have more songs on rotation these days then gnr... Not bad ror groups that never change Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: ppbebe on October 25, 2005, 05:00:42 PM "Evolution" doesn't mean doing suddenly bad music and massively changing your original sound. When I hear "oh my god" or "silkworms" I don't call it an "evolution" for GN'R, I just call it very bad music. Or rather some call your taste in music very badly limited. : ok: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mikegiuliana on October 25, 2005, 05:00:48 PM If you ask me...bands like Metallica and AC DC made the same albums over and over again. Well, you should listen Justice, then the Black album, then Load. ::) somewhere down the line it become trendy to knock metallica.. maybe it was after they cut their hair, or after load or relaod or using the orchestra.... People are far to hard on them.... having kill em all, ride the lightning, master of puppets, and justice for all and the black album they gave some diverse music and quite lengthy kick ass songs played amazingly live.. i was not a fan of st anger but their good far out weighs their bad.. Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mikegiuliana on October 25, 2005, 05:04:31 PM a setlist like
one master of puppets 'four horsemen sanitarium for whom the bell tolls whiplash fade to black eneter sandman unforgiven sad but true until it sleeps nothing else matters fuel I think alone those songs rock, some more then tohers but pure examples that metallica can flat out play so heavy and be so sensitive at the same time.. They always gave the bang for the buck... Some of those songs listed above have great instrumentals.. Kicking ass to ONE or Master of puppets :beer: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: jameslofton29 on October 25, 2005, 05:11:41 PM Mike, dont forget Metallica's "Punk Cover EP", Garage Days. It didn't sell as well as their other albums, but 'The Small Hours' is one of their best songs. 'Last Caress' is pretty cool also. They eventually had this song as their encore. I also liked how they put the price of the album on the albums title($5.98 tape, $9.98 cd). As far as i know, its the only time that has been done.
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: jarmo on October 25, 2005, 05:13:52 PM Mike, dont forget Metallica's "Punk Cover EP", Garage Days. Please do! As soon as possible! This has no place in the GN'R section. When will people understand? /jarmo Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: jameslofton29 on October 25, 2005, 05:21:30 PM Jarmo, why do you always make an example out of me when it comes to this kind of stuff? People mention other bands in this section all the time. This thread was about the evolution of GNR. Obviously, some comparisons would be made, and this time it was about the "evolution" of metallica. I just reminded everyone about that EP. I dont understand why I am always singled out when everyone else does it. Is it because I'm a "whining basher"? :hihi:
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: -Jack- on October 25, 2005, 05:43:57 PM *Drill Sargent Voice* Damnit LOFTON why cant you learn!?
:rofl: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: jarmo on October 25, 2005, 06:00:09 PM Jarmo, why do you always make an example out of me when it comes to this kind of stuff? Because your post was the last one in the thread when I looked. :P /jarmo Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mitchejw on October 26, 2005, 02:08:04 PM If you ask me...bands like Metallica and AC DC made the same albums over and over again. Well, you should listen Justice, then the Black album, then Load. ::) Whatever dude....I know all those albums...I get the same feeling from all of them... The only stuff I can appreciate is their early stuff...Enter Sandman has some nasty guitar work, but some of the worst lyrics ever written. Nothing says rock n' roll like a child's song about being scared of the boogy man...."girppin' ya pillow tieeeeeeeeght....exit light?...enter night?..." christ Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: 33 on October 26, 2005, 02:12:44 PM If you ask me...bands like Metallica and AC DC made the same albums over and over again. Well, you should listen Justice, then the Black album, then Load. ::) Whatever dude....I know all those albums...I get the same feeling from all of them... The only stuff I can appreciate is their early stuff...Enter Sandman has some nasty guitar work, but some of the worst lyrics ever written. Nothing says rock n' roll like a child's song about being scared of the boogy man...."girppin' ya pillow tieeeeeeeeght....exit light?...enter night?..." christ Oh christ why is this turning into a bloody metallica thread? They are a bloody heavy metal band!! Guns are on a completley different plain to bands like that! For any metallica fans out there I am not dissing the band I'm just saying that there is not really any comparison between the two bands! Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Neemo on October 26, 2005, 02:25:13 PM Oh christ why is this turning into a bloody metallica thread? They are a bloody heavy metal band!! Guns are on a completley different plane to bands like that! For any metallica fans out there I am not dissing the band I'm just saying that there is not really any comparison between the two bands! All I can say is, This thread has "EVOLVED" :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Pandora on October 26, 2005, 07:02:06 PM Once again, stop talking about Metallica, or this is going to get locked.
Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: mitchejw on October 27, 2005, 12:11:49 AM Once again, stop talking about Metallica, or this is going to get locked. lock it up then...cuz we have so much else to talk about...do you guys get paid to do this? cuz if u don't...why the hell do u care? it's all relevant in some way...so who cares? sure you can divide up the message board into your cute little catagories, but it all comes down to this...Gn'R...as much as I love 'em...is dead...for all intents and purposes...for whoever's fault it is....they're dead and there isn't a damn thing any of us can do about it. So what else is there to talk about? Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: 33 on October 27, 2005, 04:06:54 AM Once again, stop talking about Metallica, or this is going to get locked. but it all comes down to this...Gn'R is dead...for all intents and purposes...for whoever's fault it is....they're dead and there isn't a damn thing any of us can do about it.So why do you use this board if you beleive the band to be dead? Title: Re: Guns N' Roses-an evolution? Post by: Pandora on October 27, 2005, 05:19:04 AM Once again, stop talking about Metallica, or this is going to get locked. lock it up then...cuz we have so much else to talk about...do you guys get paid to do this? cuz if u don't...why the hell do u care? it's all relevant in some way...so who cares? sure you can divide up the message board into your cute little catagories, but it all comes down to this...Gn'R...as much as I love 'em...is dead...for all intents and purposes...for whoever's fault it is....they're dead and there isn't a damn thing any of us can do about it. So what else is there to talk about? Yeah, I get paid 10 grand a month. Bitchin' huh? Whether you agree or not with our "cute little categories" is irrelevant. Metallica is off-topic in this section and that's it. And if you have a problem with that and think that GN'R is dead and buried, do us all a favor and fuck off. Now this is definitely locked. |