|
Title: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: Luigi on August 09, 2005, 08:31:05 PM http://www.sleazeroxx.com/news05/0807gnr.shtml check this shit out
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: ClintroN on August 09, 2005, 08:34:34 PM Steven needs a new hobby man.......
Tracii Guns - co-founder of GnR......WTF Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: Luigi on August 09, 2005, 08:38:23 PM no shit, huh, I guess if Axl don't get the shit rollin somebody will. to bad they"ll sound like another cover band.
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: Ignatius on August 09, 2005, 08:53:48 PM Guns N' Roses revisited? I guess the promoters need to sell some tickets,... Anyway, I think this is "Ex-Gunners"... Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: DoubleTalkingJive on August 09, 2005, 09:01:25 PM Guns N' Roses revisited? I guess the promoters need to sell some tickets,... Anyway, I think this is "Ex-Gunners"... Exactly what I was thinking. but all in all he was a part of GNR too when they were originally signed. Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jameslofton29 on August 09, 2005, 09:06:25 PM This is very interesting. Axl will sue anything that moves but does nothing to stop this. The insanity continues..
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: DoubleTalkingJive on August 09, 2005, 09:10:35 PM This is very interesting. Axl will sue anything that moves but does nothing to stop this. The insanity continues.. That's true he does have the rights to the name...maybe he doesn't know about it yet :hihi: Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jameslofton29 on August 09, 2005, 09:16:38 PM DTJ, this is just pure insanity! If we know about it, but he doesn't, then he is not informed about what goes on in the GNR world. He owns the GNR name. He's in a court battle with ex members over publishing rights, etc. But he's gonna give these has-beens a free pass on using the GNR name? I cant hardly believe it. Its starting to look like Axl has just given up on everything.
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: DoubleTalkingJive on August 09, 2005, 09:22:23 PM DTJ, this is just pure insanity! If we know about it, but he doesn't, then he is not informed about what goes on in the GNR world. He owns the GNR name. He's in a court battle with ex members over publishing rights, etc. But he's gonna give these has-beens a free pass on using the GNR name? I cant hardly believe it. Its starting to look like Axl has just given up on everything. I guess we will hear about it if he does sue...maybe it's just being made public now..I don't know...Maybe Axl now has a soft spot for Steven. Really, maybe the "revisited" makes all the difference. There is always some legal loophole. Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jameslofton29 on August 09, 2005, 09:41:37 PM Maybe he thinks he cant win. Back in the 90's, ex members of Creedence Clearwater Revival named themselves CCR Revisited. John Fogerty sued, but he didn't win.
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: ClintroN on August 09, 2005, 09:51:54 PM Maybe he thinks he cant win. Back in the 90's, ex members of Creedence Clearwater Revival named themselves CCR Revisited. John Fogerty sued, but he didn't win. ya beat me to it, Creedence Revisited rocks man : ok: Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jimmythegent on August 09, 2005, 10:52:50 PM no more or no less disgraceful than any other sole original member using the name - who'd do such a thing aye? ooeer... :o
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: Luigi on August 09, 2005, 11:10:05 PM August 7, 2005
Steven Adler and Tracii Guns will be playing shows in Asia later this month. The band is called "Guns N' Roses Revisited" and features, in addition to Steven and Tracii, Sheldon Mandrake of Love Planet (Lead Vocals), Keri Kelli of Adler's Appetite (Rhythm Guitar) and Robbie Crane (Bass). Sheldon is recording the debut album for his solo project Love Planet later in the year after recently signing a worldwide deal with Reality Entertainment. In addition to Steven Adler also being a member of Love Planet, the album will feature some very special guest appearances. The dates are: JAKARTA, 24 August 2005 @ Tennis Indoor Senayan, Jakarta MALANG, 26 August 2005 @ Velodrome / Stadion Gajayana Malang BALI, 28 August 2005 (A Mild Live Soundrenaline) @ Pulau Serangan, Bali YOGYAKARTA, 30 August 2005 @ Stadion Mandala Krida, Yogyakarta MEDAN, 1 September 2005 @ Selecta Royal Ballroom Lt. 5, Medan SINGAPORE, 3 September 2005 @ Singapore Expo MANILA (Philippines), 5 September 2005 @ Araneta Colliseum" Guns N'Roses Revisited Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: Luigi on August 09, 2005, 11:20:29 PM What the fucken is this world coming too. Is Axl the only guy with creativity anymore, these guys have gotta have some nerve ( ya know they don't have any balls) and no class at all. I just don't understand, Axl better bring the Big Guns now otherwise the name is MUD if this shit continues!
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jameslofton29 on August 10, 2005, 12:05:04 AM Yeah, the legacy is at stake. Axl's inactivity and former members trying to cash in with the name is really fucking things up. Its sad.
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: dENIS on August 10, 2005, 01:18:45 AM This is soooo stupid...what a loser...
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: Christos AG on August 10, 2005, 02:00:06 AM Well, looks like Axl stopped them from using that name...
source: gunsnroses.us (don't go searching on the site, BP mentioned it in the forum) Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jimmythegent on August 10, 2005, 04:26:17 AM Yeah, the legacy is at stake. Axl's inactivity and former members trying to cash in with the name is really fucking things up. Its sad. But it's ok for Axl to cash in on the name? Sure, Axl had far more input than Adler in the day, but is it really that different to what Axl is doing? Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: ClintroN on August 10, 2005, 06:16:23 AM Yeah, the legacy is at stake. Axl's inactivity and former members trying to cash in with the name is really fucking things up. Its sad. But it's ok for Axl to cash in on the name? Sure, Axl had far more input than Adler in the day, but is it really that different to what Axl is doing? Yeah, Axl has moved on from the same old shit!! Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jameslofton29 on August 10, 2005, 07:17:25 AM Jimmy, there is a difference. Axl never quit GNR. He was never fired either. So in my book, he is the only member who has any rights to the name. Traci Guns has been gone 20 years, Adler about 15. There is absolutely no reason either one of those guys should get to use the GNR name.
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: cbeier78 on August 10, 2005, 12:00:16 PM and why the fuck not? its not like axl will ever put out cd or tour again so who cares. at least someone cares and talks about what they plan to do. axl is done and sometime before we hear cd we will hear that he is not going to go on under GNR. in december axl will have dissapeared for another 3 years. ITS OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: jimmythegent on August 10, 2005, 03:42:18 PM Jimmy, there is a difference. Axl never quit GNR. He was never fired either. So in my book, he is the only? member who has any rights to the name. Traci Guns has been gone 20 years, Adler about 15. There is absolutely no reason either one of those guys should get to use the GNR name. you could say the old members 'quit'. you could also say they were marginalised to the point of irrelevance, blackmailed is another word that springs to mind as well Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: michaelvincent on August 11, 2005, 10:52:27 AM They should cover 'Madagascar', 'The Blues', and 'Chinese Democracy'. :hihi:
Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES ( Revisited) Post by: kaasupoltin on August 12, 2005, 03:44:38 AM Go Adler! :peace:
|